S2E28: Chaos By Design: Decoding Current Events Through the Technocracy Playbook

Whose fingerprint is on the cold? Whose breath inside the mold? A billion dollar prayer answered in a petri dish. Tell me, is that heaven? Or just a hostage with a halo? Signed by ghosts in suits, white coats, offshore loot. Epstein Island, Santa Fe, secret pay, recruit the youth. Game decoded mantra,

chant of conscious evolution. Metamask for technocrats who harvest data like communion. Noah's fear surveillance, tell our dreams in several racks. Pearson, Teal Bank wrote a stack, AI gods on proxy tracks. They weaponize redemption, edit sins with crisper pens. Code of spirit, keep the shell, rewrite the meek to fit their ends. Ghost in the genome, code on the throne. Rule tomorrow when the sea's not our own. Pray in the data, kneel to the screen, it's free.

We'll see you next time. Lost in an NFT, traded for service labs Upload the conscience, auction the flesh Legislate death through a silicone mesh Run that test, bet your breath Who's your god when the code out? Lift your chest up!

If the future's a marketplace and the souls aren't clearance, remember, a bargain with a ghost still costs you your breath.

Click the little box, don't read the line It's all binding, buddy, sign after sign The devil's got a lawyer and he's working for free You'll rent your own shadow for a monthly fee No pen, ain't no face Just a phantom contract in a database Agree, agree, that's the key You don't own nothing but the lock and the fee Signed with a finger, blood on the screen Terms and conditions in a corporate dream They'll leash you the sunlight, the shoes on your feet They'll auction your laughter down on Market

Street A box unchecked is a door that won't open The future's foreclosed and the contrast been spoken Click-wrap chains, man, they never break Even God signed once by mistake Agree, agree, that's the key You don't know nothing but the lock and the fee Signed with a finger, blood on the screen Terms and conditions in a corporate dream Step right up, don't be shy Scroll down the page, let your freedom die No exit door, no midnight train Just a click, hear a tattoo carved into your brain Agree, agree That's the key You don't

know nothing but the lock and the fee Signed with a finger, blood on the screen Terms and conditions in a corporate dream

I woke up to silence But the war had begun They froze my account Said I'd done something wrong Wasn't no crime Just living free Now the system Got a chain on me They took my savings

My future, my land With a single cold line and a government hand Said it was safety Said it was green But all I see is tyranny behind the screen This ain't innovation It's a trap in disguise Watched all your life Genes ain't freedom Creality ain't clear It's a cage

they built While we cheered I believed in the promise But the same old swamp just changed its brand He banned the front door, opened the back Signed the bills that launched a fire

This ain't innovation It's a trap in disguise You'll own nothing Be watched all your life Genes ain't freedom It's a case they build while we chill Your gold, your guns, your voice,

your name They'll digitize it all then shift the blame Palantirizing AI chains Freedom dying slow in patriotic flames This ain't about safety It's control in disguise With your ID, your face, your tears, your time They wrapped it in stars, sold it with pride But freedom's bleeding out

From the inside DEFCON won And they call it peace But I still got breath I still believe We can break the code, escape the scheme Turn this nightmare back into a dream We don't bow, we don't break We don't give what they can take We don't bow,

we don't break We don't give what they can take Roger stood with fire in his hand We went built a haven on free land Roman wrote the code they fear the most Now they're ghosts in the machine they boast They dress it up as law and order But it chains across the border Can't hide the truth in

paper lies Freedom's got a billion eyes We are told we don't bow, we don't break. EO- fourteen-o-six-seven. Yeah, yo. A law that kills the hope we're given.

But paper crowns Roger, we will stand for you. We will fight it through. Your code will run.

We won't do what we are told We don't bow, we don't break We don't give what they can take All right, welcome back to the Aaron Day Show. This is season two, episode twenty eight. We have a pretty timely episode tonight, which is going to be current events through a technocracy lens. Also going to discuss a little bit about the new workshops that are coming up to defeat technocracy.

I was traveling all last week, which you probably noticed if you watched any of the production quality from the podcast that we did from the road. But learned quite a bit, you know, probably presented to six hundred people, seven hundred people and got a ton of feedback. Just had an opportunity to really interact with people and and hear their opinions about what's going on. But also one of the talks was a ninety minute talk specifically focused on solutions to technocratic threats. So, I mean, say, twenty minutes of it was about technocracy. The rest was a huge high level overview of the Zeno ecosystem. And so there really is a ton of interest in

people wanting to get hands-on involved and to really start figuring out how to use these technologies and so it's quite the challenge to figure out because workshops which are in person you know I can only reach a couple hundred people at a time so I'm going to be focusing on how to scale this up and I want to get as much feedback as I can as possible and I'm going to be using the freedom forge website as a way to do that so we'll talk about that as we get further into this um so with that said I want to jump through this you can you can watch this now live at theerrandayshow.com so I encourage you to check out that website there's going

to be a lot of changes probably in the next week or so to even how live streaming works directly through that site I'm actually going to begin hosting the site directly so you'll be able to see the live stream, not just a pasted channel through YouTube, but you will actually be able to see streaming directly from my server. And then actually after the live stream, it will then be uploaded to IPFS where it'll be decentralized and it will be permanently available and completely censorship resistant. So it's a little bit cumbersome to do this, but I think it's important moving forward. Because essentially, I think that the topics that we're talking about, as more people start waking

up to technocracy and more people start moving to decentralized solutions, I believe this content will become even more censored and even more shadow banned. So I encourage you to. check out theerrandayshow.com. And as I look at it, I'm just trying to get the live stream going. There might be a problem with the link, but in any event, we'll figure that out through the show as well. I wanted to talk about, I'll walk through the last few episodes and just touch on some highlights. So last week, my wife and I did a podcast and the subject was why voting doesn't matter in twenty twenty five. And we kind of shared our combined forty years of experience as activists who have really

run multiple organizations, have seen politics from the local level all the way up to the highest level of federal politics, have recruited candidates, supported candidates, basically figured out how the game works. And so often when I say voting is irrelevant, we need to exit and build. It's not it's not coming from a place where, you know, I'm just making some side comments, having never experienced or tried political activism. We were heavily involved in politics in New Hampshire, which many would argue is the most libertarian state in the country and ran some of the most effective organizations within New Hampshire. And I want to share, we did share, but we're going to redo this episode.

And in fact, it'll probably be more than a month out because we realized that Having done that episode, not only having technical issues, but there's so much to go through, so much to organize that we actually want to lay out the visuals better. And the reason that I even wanted to address this topic is that I'm very serious about the fact that we are facing this technocratic threat. And it's an existential threat from the standpoint of free will. And so I'm seeing a lot of people that are very well-intentioned, people that are very smart and very passionate, but have no political experience. They're essentially making the same mistakes that we've made. So rather than,

we don't have a lot of time. The technocrats are moving very quickly. They have substantial resources, including a lot of our money that they take through taxes. And so I think it's critical that we try to at least share knowledge so that people don't make the same mistakes. And I think we can make a compelling case that when you really do understand how voting actually works, and what is required to get elected and to maintain political power in the current system, that it is far better to exit and build and to start building alternatives. And at the very least, Even if you don't agree with that, I think that once you watch the full presentation, you'll at least start to

allocate some percentage of your time to actually building these parallel systems. Because when you watch the overview and you see what's involved in actually winning politics, you'll realize it's a very low probability event. And once you understand the low probability of winning in politics, and you combine that with the severity of the threat from technocracy, this is why I have such a sense of urgency, which is we need to begin building these parallel systems now and incredibly quickly. And there is not a sense of urgency, and we need that sense of urgency. The week prior to that was a great episode, still while we were on the road, entitled First Principles for Human Systems.

And so once again, I'm going to pop up the website, TheAaronDayShow.com. And one of the things that you can see is there is a section in this website called Principles. It's one of the tabs. And I encourage you to check this out. The whole point of this, and I've talked about this topic many times on this podcast, is which is if you want to break down what's happened with politics in the US or even what's happened with the deterioration of any systems, education, media, whatever it happens to be, when you really examine it, it's that what broke down is they abandoned first principles.

You could even say the same thing happened to I mean, in the case of the U.S., it's been two hundred and fifty years since the country was founded and we were even debating and putting forward first principles. And so the idea here is to have online. I don't want to call them debates, but discourses where we have anywhere between two and four people talking about fundamental issues from a first principle perspective. So, you know, first principle might be something like free will. or property rights and the whole long list of these things. And the idea behind this is this is something that we'll probably do once a month, but we want to get the best people on to have an actual conversation,

not a debate where it's two minutes of talking points, but to actually start having real conversations about these ideas, because this is not happening anywhere else. Doesn't happen through mainstream media. It does not happen on social media. Social media algorithms are tailored to manipulate your dopamine and for rage baiting. They are not there for long form conversations, ongoing, depthful, meaningful conversations. Academia no longer serves this purpose. It used to, but now it's even more profound indoctrination. And the higher you get in the process, the more and greater the indoctrination is. So this is going to be a long rolling process,

but it's going to be community driven. It's not going to be me being the primary participant in these discourses. I'm going to be moderating the panel, but I will likely not be a participant in the panel. I'm trying to find people that are smarter and more knowledgeable about these topics, which are going to be numerous depending upon what the topic is. However, you can go to the airandday.com show website and you can register for a free account and you can submit what topics you think are of interest, what first principles, when you think of what are fundamental ideas that we need to think about moving forward in terms of designing these human systems,

submit those ideas and also nominate speakers, nominate people to participate in these panels. So it's not gonna be driven from the top down by me, it's going to be driven by the community. And I did find that there was more interest in this topic than I thought. I had given a talk on this over a year or so ago, and there wasn't as much interest in it then. It was kind of right prior to the election. But I found talking to people afterwards that there is actually quite an appetite. I mean, when I say an appetite, this will not be a mainstream topic any more than the founders debating these ideas early on was a mainstream topic. The point of this isn't to generate maximum views,

but it's to provide a framework for people who are interested in these ideas to have a platform to have these conversations. So I really do encourage you to check out TheAaronDayShow.com. And I am going to continue on every episode to push this site because, as I said, I remember when COVID first hit. And I went online and I did a series every day. I did a video. And the whole point of the video, each video segment, it was like, thirty to sixty minutes each day, was trying to educate people on how to move to decentralized systems in advance of a crackdown in censorship from the government on COVID. So I saw in advance they were going to be cracking

down on social media. I saw in advance a whole variety of things, including financial censorship. So I would, for instance, I would say, hey, instead of using SMS, move to Signal. Instead of using YouTube, use Odyssey. Instead of using your credit card or your bank card, move to crypto. Introducing people to that. Instead of using Twitter at the time. And so on and on, I did these things. But about five days in, I was shadow banned. So in the process of trying to educate people about a coming censorship and shadow ban, I was myself shadow banned. I went from having fifty thousand followers across multiple social media channels to being rate limited at about fifty views per day.

And of course, at that point, I stopped doing the videos because the only people that could see them are the people that saw them previously. It wasn't enough to continue to move forward. I anticipate that to happen again, but I think it's going to happen in a different way this time because the algorithms are much more sneaky in the way that they can even do the shadow banning now I remember when hearing about shadow people first started banning as a concept I mean that was not a term that people had been familiar with and then it really was evil it's like you don't realize your views are being suppressed you don't realize you're posting and you're posting only to yourself there was no

transparency of course we later found out there's this whole censorship industrial complex and it got much worse it was much much worse than just uh shadow banning it was actually outright censorship so anyway I anticipate that moving forward and I actually anticipate I actually think that while I've been working on trying to talk about these ideas for a long time, I think within the next ninety days or so, the stuff that that you're listening to on this podcast is going to become not mainstream, but it's going to become people are going to start realizing, hey, this is actually the important issue. wait a minute, And when that happens, if morality starts, that's when the censorship

is likely to begin. So, again, these websites are all free and so there's no no money involved. So I encourage you to check out I'm putting a link in the comments the air and day show dot com this is one of five websites that I've either launched or am launching and at some point once they're all launched I'll do an entire episode on why I put all these things together and the overall strategy is for all of this so the week prior to that I did an episode called break the grid how the xeno ecosystem can defeat technocratic tyranny this is a much must watch episode if you are really interested in starting to get hands-on involved in moving away

from the system and You know, I'll tell you, this will be a good time to talk a little bit about our experiences on our travels last week. So my wife and I left last Monday, We drove down to first to D.C. rented a car. where we sat in on a hearing, this Senate hearing with Senator Ron Johnson. And it was about. vaccines and he had a panel that included a brownstone fellow toby rogers who's a who's a phenomenal guy great guy who's been studying this autism issue phd who's been studying this autism issue for years and has put together the most comprehensive research on not only that topic but

in the process he kind of realized how big pharma works and how research itself works and then aaron siri was there I mean I hate government and you know I don't have a huge belief in political solutions and I really don't like going to washington dc but this was the super bowl of it was truly an amazing hearing and I mean, Senate hearings. I encourage you to check it out and to share the content. I mean, especially the stuff from, you know, well, from, from Toby Rogers, Marin Siri and Ron Johnson was absolutely great. And if more people can hear the information they were trying to share, then maybe individuals will take back some of their own power and stop using the healthcare system,

which I think is our best way out. But not hoping for a political solution, but in any event, the information that was presented in that hearing was absolutely phenomenal. So that was kind of the first event. Then we went to Polyface Farms, which is Joel Salatin's farm, also in Virginia, a couple, two and a half hours away from D.C. And this was a phenomenal event. I mean, it was great to be on... his farm and the whole theme of it is about kind of independence and how we can kind of take back our power and individual freedom and start talking about solutions. And a lot of people there, Thomas Massey spoke,

a lot of people spoke on the COVID issue. Dr. Robert Malone was there. And then I spoke and I spoke at the end of the first day. And so my takeaway from this event is that I think that it's great that the truth about COVID is being exposed. And I think that there's been phenomenal work done and it's going to continue. more bombshell information And I think there's some coming out in the weeks ahead. Information that shows that, I mean, the COVID situation, this wasn't just an accident. This was outright fraud. We're going to start to learn a little bit more about the motives behind it all.

And I think it's great because exposing what happened will start to wake people up more to fundamentally how broken our institutions are, not just government, but big tech, healthcare, and so forth. The problem is that there are some people that are doing victory laps as if exposing the truth on this issue means that we won. And I see this all the time. I'm watching Alex Jones. We've defeated the globalists. And none of that is true. The technocrats are winning, and they're winning at an accelerated pace. And because of the rhetoric and because of the way that

this whole thing has been positioned, people aren't looking at technocracy people aren't realizing or aware of the fact that while a year ago people might have said look I don't like klaus schwab the wef the un agenda all this other stuff I don't want digital ids cbdcs all of that they think they've won not realizing we now have implemented all those things and in some cases they've cheered it on and now we're running out of time and the interesting thing about the brownstone audience is a lot of those people were new people that I hadn't seen at other Brownstone events. And I think they probably got introduced to the Brownstone Institute because of the COVID issue. And when I explained what

was going on with technocracy, literally I was, I was watching people in the audience, their jaws drop because I laid down information that, you know, people watch this show have heard quite a bit, but that is certainly not mainstream. It's not known Nobody's talking about this stuff in terms of what's going on with technocracy, the links with Palantir, Peter Thiel. But more importantly, starting to dig into, and this is going to be the most sensitive issue and probably the hardest nut to crack overall, which is kind of J.D. Vance and I think more importantly, Elon Musk. So many people view Musk... as a hero. They think he saved free speech by purchasing

Twitter and all these other things. None of that is actually true. But more importantly, he had a specific technocratic agenda in mind from the outset. So revealing that information, there's that Charles Tartt quote that I always talk about. When you present an idea that's one level above a person's consciousness, They are excited about it. Two levels above, they fall asleep. Three levels, they become angry. And four levels, they want to kill the presenter. And I think that's the case with technocracy in general. Most people are unaware of technocracy. And with Musk, you're going to get an even greater angry response. There are a lot of people that didn't... I've been

talking to people about... musk situation for a long time and again I don't dislike him as an entrepreneur I bought the first tesla in new hampshire I mean I still use starlink the issue is not about not liking technology it's about technocracy as a system of government that takes control out of the hands of the individual and puts it entirely in control of scientists and engineers picked by elites which is the philosophy that musk subscribes to So he can be great at technology, and that can be fine, but it's once you start moving into the realm of force, into the realm of using the state, into the realm of going after and frankly, people's free will, that's where I take an issue with it.

So it's going to be kind of a long rollout, and I've been thinking a lot about how to present that. I will probably do a Musk-centered... episode at some point not now but maybe a month and a half two months down the line I'm going to build into it because I know it's going to piss people off this is going to be one of those level two level three issues for a lot of people even people that I know I told some people early on I said look musk is a technocrat here's the background here's what he said about ubi here's what he said about energy credits look at where his stance was on the COVID vaccine and everything else. And a lot of the response I got back was, well, he's changed,

which of course is true. And by the way, everybody has free will. My point in this is not even to try to create division. It would be my hope that Elon, who also has free will, changes and adjusts and maybe puts a little bit more emphasis and focus behind freedom. importance of free will so I'm not I'm not here to like divide and make more enemies I guess in the end the idea is to maybe try to get this information to elon musk and try to present this because depending upon when he was indoctrinated with these ideas he may not have questioned or examined these things and how early these ideas were introduced to him because it seems like they've become foundational but it's going

to be very important to start noticing this and the reason I think that there's now somewhat of an opening is around one key issue I said listen doge is never going to work do you remember this people thought they were going to reduce the they were going to close the budget deficit completely that doge was actually going to completely wipe out the budget deficit people believe this people thought this was going to happen And then when it didn't happen, there was this great little psyop where it was like, well, okay, Congress in Washington, D.C., and Musk continues to repeat this, can't be saved. I'm going to go off and form my America's party. This is how we're going to beat this.

the platform for that is technocracy. Which, by the way, first talking about AI being used for the military, then AI used to make government more efficient. It's not about making government smaller in terms of what it does and the functions it performs. It's about making it more efficient. There's a big difference. But then what did they do? What did Doge do in this process? They handed over IRS information on all Americans to Palantir. And now Palantir is building a database of Americans. So the technocracy aspects were successful. And I would argue that Musk accomplished what he wanted to accomplish. But people are now looking to say, yeah, Doge wasn't successful.

And now people look at it and say, yeah, I am a little upset that my well, you know, IRS information is now going to Palantir, which will then be tied to my real ID. So there are cracks that are I'm going to lay out the full case, starting to happen. as I said, at some point, maybe six or seven weeks from now. But I expect it to piss a lot of people off and it might lead to even more shadow banning. But that was my revelation. when the Brownstone talk people Seriously, came up to me, the response from a lot of people was, wow, that was really interesting information. I'm glad I knew this. You have workshops. How can I learn more? But I had some people come up to me and say,

you scared the shit out of me. I'm going to go look at your website and look at your information, but only after I have a little bit of time to even digest what was said. And that was actually the reaction from... more than one person there were a lot of people that had that reaction they had not heard about any of these ideas and essentially what I laid out was what I've laid out here several times we already are eighty percent of the way to owning nothing because we've given away our rights and our information through online click wrap agreements and that centralized tokenization such as the genius act and the clarity act with stocks bonds and commodities will make it so that the

combination of us surrendering our rights to these contracts plus the ability for centralized actors to be able to monitor program and censor all of our assets not just our money that is the one-two punch that allows technocracy to be implemented so I'm preparing for a pretty tough road ahead based on the reactions that that I've seen not a tough road I it's it is shocking and I my point I don't want to scare people for the sake of scaring people like this isn't a I'm not monetizing clicks there's no there's no profit motive in fact the only way this is important or helpful is not if people become paralyzed when they hear

this information but they actually start taking action and from my perspective I guess part of the reason that I want to do the thing explaining the forty years of political experience is to say look yes you now know how bad this is don't go now waste your time thinking you're going to fix it politically we are on we are at this late stage part of the process it's time to start building parallel systems I'll continue to talk about how we can build private decentralized peer-to-peer alternatives So that was the second event. The third event was I went to Chris Martinson's event, Peak Prosperity, which is a great event. I went to this last year. And last year I did a workshop.

I did a full, not a full workshop, but I think I had like three hours. I had two different segments. And one thing that was interesting about it was just to see how much has happened in the last year. Because when I did that workshop, none of the stuff that I talked about in this episode twenty five existed there was no freedom dollar the xeno was only available in cake wallet and the xeno wallets there was no confidential layer there was no xano bay marketplace there was no xanos on e-commerce site there was no integration with matrix so on the one hand it was phenomenal and some of the people in the audience I had given free monero and free xeno five dollars each and they're like oh they

looked at it's like oh oh, wow, I forgot about that. And then they check the wallet. It's like, okay, the price went up, which isn't the point. But now it's good to be able to give a talk and tell people what something's going to do. And then when you come back a year later, it's done more than you said it was going to do, which I think is a great statement about the whole Zeno ecosystem and what's been built. But coming up after this, I was just surrounded by people after the event. I mean, all over the place. And people came up and they want workshops. How can I learn more? And this is where I created freedomforge.io, which I will talk about.

I'm putting the link in the comments as well, which is all about educating people about the Zeno ecosystem, which wallets to download, how to buy it, how to swap for it, but also how to use it. So the whole point is to create guides and to maximize the number of people that can be onboarded. And I wanna work on the workshops, but I wanna get some feedback on this because it's more important I just want to get as many people on board as possible. And the workshops are really expensive and time consuming. And I will do them, but I only want to do them in the context of if it matters. And I want them to be meaningful, like people that already

are committed to building, right? Not just, here's how to get a wallet. Because traveling a thousand miles or two thousand miles to teach a hundred people how to download a wallet is not a great use of time. But if we could get a bunch of people in a room and onboard merchants and get people who want to work on businesses together together and brainstorm different ideas and different ways to counter these technocratic threats, I think that would be really helpful. So that was my takeaway from that. And Martinson's group, these are people that are already kind of hardcore entrepreneurs. working on alternative solutions these are people that are you know already doing a lot of their own

regenerative farming already adopting privacy tech so I'm going to be doing more work I believe with with chris martinson more content there and hopefully more and continued involvement in these events. But again, the takeaway for me was there's now huge demand, but we have to make the tools and the information much easier, much more accessible. And I work on that. And I'll tell you that it's tough for me too. It's tough because the technology itself is evolving so fast. And so I have to stay on top of that myself and I'm developing some of the technology. But I think a lot of people in the crypto space have no idea what it's like talking to people that aren't in crypto about these solutions.

and so we really need to work on messaging and I even need to work on the messaging I try to simplify things but I you know I want to keep on simplifying and simplifying and please push back and if you have questions don't ever feel stupid about any of this understand my goal is not to show how smart I am or how much I know about this stuff my only goal in this is to help empower people to take control of their own lives using these technologies and so I can always do better at communicating and always look forward to any kind of feedback that can help me do a better job and help to get others involved to explain these technologies and get people engaged. As far as events go,

I'm hoping this is the last. Again, these events, as we learned with the podcast, I'm not going to be doing podcasts on the road. I am going to be consistent about doing this show, though, on Mondays and Thursdays. So if that means having to do prerecorded segments or whatever, I will. But doing these podcasts from the road is not as easy as I would have hoped. I even brought my computer and mixing board and everything else. And it's just then you find out you don't have decent enough Internet access. But the next event I'm going to is the Brownstone Fifth Annual Conference and Gala October thirty first through November the first. I really encourage you to check this out.

These Brownstone events are are some of my favorite events ever that I've ever been to. Jeffrey Tucker really creates a unique environment that, I don't know, it's kind of indescribable, but it's really a reflection of who he is. So I would say that it's kind of... I would say it's focused on truth, beauty, and freedom if I had to describe what it's about because that's what he's about. I mean, you see him and he's wearing his cape or whatever or one of the events and he'll bring in a string section or whatever to play beautiful music. He always picks beautiful hotels. But the people that are there are people that are

there because at least the speakers are there because they were punished for speaking the truth. And the people in the audience are people that are interested in the truth and largely just learned, many of them themselves, that they've been duped. And we've all learned this one way or another at various times based on different experiences. But these are great events. So if there are any tickets left, I encourage you to check it out. I've never spent any time in Salt Lake City, so I'm looking forward to it. And I'm looking forward to speaking as well. So with that said, I'm going to, I'll move on to start moving on to tonight's topic is just as a refresher for everyone.

The whole point of this podcast and everything that I'm doing is to highlight the fact that the war that we're in right now is actually technocracy versus freedom. Technocracy being scientists and elites making decisions for us using social credit systems, digital currencies, ultimately tied to energy credit. and what's at stake is free will itself and I believe that the big battleground now at this point in time is tokenization because as I said earlier the way they're going to take technocratic control is use the surrendering of our legal rights which we've already largely done in conjunction with programmable digital tokens that they control and censor that represent all of our assets

the reason that I'm passionate about xeno is xeno has the alternative to that the alternative to centralized transparent tokens that represent your assets are private tokens that you have in your own self-custody that you can trade with anyone anywhere in the world without third parties and so I've designed and kind of structured what I'm doing into three different areas one is trying to wake people up to technocracy the other is trying to help people understand that they have free will. Many people don't even realize they have free will. They've been programmed to the point where they're kind of on autopilot. They still have free will, but, you know, the programs are kind of

subconscious programming programs are taken over. So things that I'm doing in this area include this website, ownnothing.org, where people will be able to see what they've given up in terms of their rights through all of these online agreements. You'll be able to paste a link to a contract and we'll analyze and we'll show you. This is what you've given up in terms of privacy, ownership, eight different dimensions. That's one example. And there'll be other tools and other things to help people realize this. People realizing that they do have control over their own lives and that they can shut off these systems and exit these systems is critical. If people don't start doing that,

there isn't much hope. The good news is anyone can do this at any point. Then the third area is the revolution will be tokenized, and this is building new systems. that are private and decentralized as an alternative. And there really is a way for people to live and make money and trade. In fact, it's probably one of the biggest economic opportunities I've ever seen, but it's a little bit difficult to explain. So trying to explain it better and then also make the tools better and start connecting people is the third way. And if we do all three of these things, if people wake up, take control of their free will and build alternatives, then we actually... can stop this technocratic

tyranny so I'm not black billed at all I am black billed on any idea that reforming these existing systems that that is a foolish idea which I will document in greater detail but but I'm very optimistic that we can do these things and I'm very excited about where we are with zeno so today's topic is really about current events decoded so I wanted to because what we're seeing and I'm going to talk about charlie kirk but not not in a conspiracy theory sense I'm not going to speculate on who did it and and I will say I mean I've actually you know being gone last week because we were out on the farm and everything else I didn't

have cell phone access most of the time so didn't even see most of what was going on Which was a good thing, because then when I got back into it today and started looking at the feed, I'm like, okay, I think I'm going to spend less time on social media. But what I do think has happened is what the technocrats expect to happen, what happens every time, which is that we now have multiple civil wars going on. And every time a big event like this happens, people use it as an opportunity to say, well, this is who caused it. And then it fractures in a whole bunch of different ways. And because Charlie Kirk's ideas are polarizing, this is a great vector for that.

But I'm not going to speculate on who did it or why. It does matter. And the truth does matter as to who is behind this. But what I am going to talk about is how ultimately the technocrats are going to use it. Because the technocrats have been, since probably, using these crises to put in place more financial surveillance, more centralized control, and greater movement towards a one world government. And so again, we'll have the Q&A later. And I don't really want to spend a lot of time on speculation. But I do want to use this as illuminate how the an opportunity to technocrats are using this.

Now, today, J.D. Vance actually hosted the Charlie Kirk show. So I'm going to play a very short clip from that in case you didn't catch that. Let me see if I have this loaded here. I thought I had it. Let me see. Let me load it up real quick. It's a very short clip. It's not even a minute, I think. Maybe it's only forty-five seconds. It's basically just the introduction of the show. I did not have enough time to actually watch the whole show today,

but here's the clip. Hey, everybody. JD Vance here, live from my office in the White House complex and filling in for somebody who cannot be filled in for, but I'm going to try to do my best, my dear friend, the great Charlie Kirk. Every single person in this building, we owe something to Charlie. He was a joyful warrior for our country. He loved America. He devoted himself tirelessly to making our country a better place. He was a critical part of getting Donald Trump elected as president, getting me elected as vice president. Everyone knew him as this fearless debater, this guy who would take the conservative message into hostile places and inspire

younger generations to have courage. All right, so here we go. I'm not sure what happened to my video. Hold on a second. Let me hopefully the video will pop out. Oh, there we go. Okay, videos back. So I'm not gonna I'm not claiming that, Vance had anything to do with you know, with Charlie Kirk at all. And I'm sure you know, he is Feelings towards Kirk are sincere. So that's not the angle here.

But what I do want to talk about is, and give a little background on who J.D. Vance is relative to this technocracy movement, because this is another thing that people are widely unaware of. His entire background and his entire backstory has been constructed. He is a construction. He is a construction largely of Peter Thiel, and there are a lot of implications because of this and things that people need to realize. And so I'm going to walk through that part of it tonight. And so we're going to go timeline here with J.D. through a little bit of a Vance. The first timeline,

the first segment here is two thousand eleven to two thousand sixteen. And I'm calling this the mentor years. This is where Peter Thiel. Started mentoring J.D. Vance. So in twenty eleven, a Yale law student named J.D. Vance attended a talk that would change his life. The speaker was Peter Thiel, and his message was simple. Forget law. Come to Silicon Valley. The future belongs to tech. And what Vance didn't know is that he was being recruited into something much bigger. In twenty eleven, he was at Yale Law School, probably planning to be a corporate lawyer. And Teal gave a talk called Technological Stagnation. and was attacking elite career paths and tells students law firms and

government jobs are dead ends. Real power is in Silicon Valley building companies and disrupting systems. And Vance later called this the most significant moment in his life. A couple of years later in twenty thirteen, he graduates, joins Sydney and Austin, which is a well-known law firm. And then less than two years later, he bails. He suddenly starts working at Circuit Therapeutics, a biotech startup, which is interesting because he had absolutely no biotech experience, no science background. So how did he get the job? Well, the CEO of Circuit Therapeutics said and admitted directly it was a favor to Peter Thiel.

Thiel's VC firm had invested in Moll's previous company, Vance Pharmaceuticals. hired him as, Vance was hired as director of operations, which is a really vague title for someone learning the ropes in biotech. Again, this is a guy with no scientific background and a very brief experience as a lawyer. So Thiel is basically playing his chess pieces, getting Vance into Silicon Valley. And when you consider actually what peter I'll do a separate show on peter thiel at some point but his his whole program to get kids out of high school and and help them to start launch businesses he's been playing chess pieces and recruiting people and playing the long game for quite some while so after

circuit therapeutics he joins mithril capital and he enjoins this firm as a principal and it's named after armor and the lord of the rings which you'll find a lot of tech companies love these fantasy references, including Palantir and many others. Thiel even wrote a blurb for his book, Hillbilly Elegy, which Vance didn't even write, had a whole bunch of other people, propagandists, Mercer and others behind it. Coworkers actually claimed that Vance was rarely in the office when he was at Mithril Capital. He was spending most of his time promoting his book. One colleague said he never saw him once during an entire year.

So the transformation is beginning. At this point, Vance enters as a law school grad from Ohio. he's in Thiel's inner circle, Within three years, learning venture capital, but more importantly, Thiel's worldview. The hillbilly from Appalachia is becoming a Silicon Valley operator. So in short, by twenty sixteen, he's gone from a law student to a Teal protege. But. Teal isn't just teaching people business about business, he's teaching ideology. In fact, I think even tonight right now, as this podcast is going on, Teal is giving one of a multi part talk about the Antichrist. And again, the show on Teal,

long time to prepare for, which is going to take me a is going to be very interesting. And I think people will be, it will be eye-opening and horrifying for many. So that's phase one. Phase two is really all about building power. It's about building the machine. This is the, call it the investment phase from twenty seventeen to twenty nineteen. Peter Thiel doesn't just make investments, he builds empires. And in twenty nineteen, he helped JD Vance built his own venture capital firm with nearly one hundred million dollars. This was not about making money, it was about building a political machine. So from a timetable perspective,

Now we're in twenty seventeen. Vance lives leaves Mithril Capital after a clash with the managing partner. He then joined Steve Case's Revolution Firm, which I've actually examined that quite a bit. I didn't realize I don't even know if that's still going on. Steve Case is is a far left. Guy in this venture capital firm was out of Washington, D.C., in fact. While at Case's firm, he works on Rise of the Rest, investing in middle America. But Steve Case later said, well, Vance really wasn't working that much. I mean, kind of like his role at Mithril Capital. He was out promoting his book, not really doing anything at Mithril Capital.

Then in twenty nineteen, Vance announces his own VC firm in Cincinnati. Narya Capital. And I will tell you, I've met with, I used to be a VC for a very short period of time from called Industry Ventures, which is now a three billion dollar firm. It was like a hundred million dollar fund when I was involved in, I don't know, two thousand one, two thousand two. Venture firms, you will not find very many venture firms in Cincinnati. That is not a critical place. In fact, that has to be one of the worst places on the planet. to launch a tech-focused firm. I mean, when I say these guys are playing the long game, even Vivek running for

governor and everything else, there are a lot of pieces that have been put in place here for a long period of time. You would not start a business in Ohio. I spend a lot of time, I mean, I wouldn't even start a business in New Hampshire. You always look for the best laws, the best taxes, and everything else. And Ohio does not come to mind for this. So he raises ninety three million dollars and a lot of money for a first time fund. Who are the investors in this fund? Peter Thiel, Marc Andreessen and Eric Schmidt. Eric Schmidt was the former CEO of Google. Complete lefty, complete lefty and absolutely a technocrat. These guys don't generally just invest in random first time fund managers.

This is Thiel building Vance's independent power base. Now you have Vance in the middle with people like Andreessen, who's only recently, I mean, back in twenty nineteen, Andreessen wasn't even very political. So now Vance is being positioned right in the middle here of very powerful people, but that have kind of a full range spectrum of ideology. Then in the same year, Vance co-funds something called Rockbridge Network with a guy by the name of Chris Buskirk. And at this point, he's starting to build out his conservative donor network, but not the traditional GOP. The mission here is replace

the current Republican ecosystem. The funders of Rockbridge Network include Teal allies and other tech billionaires. So this is where they begin building the alternative power structures outside of traditional politics. This is the strategic positioning. Nara Capital gives Vance economic credibility. Rockbridge gives him a political network, both funded and influenced by Thiel and his inner circle. Vance now has money connections and an ideology. He is clearly being positioned for something bigger. It's during this time he moves back to Ohio, but stays connected to Silicon Valley. So he gets the best of both worlds.

He gets heartland credibility, but tech money. He's setting up for a political run. And even at that time, it was pretty transparent to people that something was coming. And it was reported at the time that Thiel was encouraging him to run for office. So in short, By twenty nineteen, the machine is built. Vance has the money, he has the network, he has the backing. Now all he needs is the opportunity. And in twenty twenty one, that opportunity finally arrives. In twenty twenty two, Peter Thiel did something unprecedented, he dropped fifteen million dollars on a single Senate race.

Not a presidential campaign, not a governorship, one Senate seat in Ohio. Because J.D. Why? Vance wasn't just a candidate. He was Teal's project going operational. This is a huge lot. I mean, Teal had previously invested two million dollars in a super PAC supporting Ron Paul for president back in two thousand and eight. Or was it two thousand twelve? Whatever. But, you know, he's he has been known to put big money into campaigns. But putting that amount in into a U.S. Senate campaign is absolutely unprecedented. So. At this point, they've got a bit of a problem because. you've got to understand

Vance has a Trump problem. Early Vance called Trump America's Hitler in private messages. He said Trump was cultural heroine for struggling Americans. Well, this is a big problem if you're now in an Ohio primary where Trump's endorsement is absolutely critical for winning. So how are they going to solve this? Well, it's a Mar-a-Lago solution. In twenty twenty one in February, Thiel personally brings Vance to meet Trump at Mar-a-Lago. So this is a billionaire vouching for his protege. So literally this is where Thiel introduces Vance to Trump. Trump had never met him previously.

And it was at that meeting where Trump essentially brokers peace between Vance and Trump. Right after that, Vance does an immediate and complete, one hundred and eighty degree turnaround and becomes Trump's biggest defender. the transformation is so dramatic I mean, it raises eyebrows, and you may have seen some of the clips, because there are numerous clips of Vance previously just completely bashing Trump in public. Truly was one of the biggest never-Trumpers. So it raised a lot of eyebrows, but nevertheless, Teal commits to fifteen million dollars to the Protect Ohio Values Pack, largest single donation to Senate race ever.

but it's also not just money, it's a signal to other donors. And I've seen this, I've experienced this personally. I mentioned last week that we had a super PAC that I started called Stark Three Sixty and we raised a quarter of a million dollars from a PAC called Mayday PAC, which was headed by Larry Lessig. Well, it turns out Larry Lessig had backing from Peter Thiel. And when we looked at the list of donors to Mayday, When Peter Thiel comes in, it's kind of like, you know, in the whole PayPal mafia, it's like, okay, one guy's in. I think Reid Hoffman might have been in that as well. One guy comes in and then they just play pass the hat and a whole bunch of other people come in.

And so this is kind of a normal thing. And that's exactly what happened here. Teal also steers another two hundred thousand dollars through other dark money groups. And he recruits ten other major tech donors, including David Sachs, our current crypto AI czar who invested one million dollars in J.D. Vance's Senate campaign. This campaign involves Teal's money funds, a massive ad campaign, and Vance goes from unknown to front runner. By April of, Trump endorses Vance just weeks before the primary. And so now you have the combination of Trump endorsement plus teal money,

which is unstoppable. Vance wins the primary, then he wins the general election. And again, I talked about this last week, people still believe in politics and this whole Mr. Smith goes to Washington and you know, that cartoon of this is how a bill is made. None of that has anything to do with politics. It's said that in the Southern District of New Hampshire, you can indict a ham sandwich. You can elect a ham sandwich because the voters have almost no information. We're talking zero to low information voters. Get out the vote is controlled by big data and AI. The candidates are preselected by the elites. And the whole thing is an illusion of choice.

So again, in a month or so, we'll do one on, I'll show how voting works, how elections work, really work, not textbook propaganda work. But this is a great example of it right here with J.D. Vance. So now you can see the puppet strings. Vance offers a dinner with him and Teal to top donors. Campaign explicitly marketed as Teal-backed. The opposition even starts calling him a Peter Thiel puppet. And Vance doesn't even deny it. He actually kind of leans into it in a way. It wasn't hidden influence. this is one of these things, I mean, at this point, and this is a common thing with technocrats. They actually think we're so stupid that they don't even

bother to hide this stuff. And they actually turn it into an asset. People start actually, oh, wow, he's backed by Peter Thiel. This must be great. So that's where we are. So now Vance is a U.S. senator bought and paid for. But Teal isn't done. This was always just a stepping stone because what's the value of having a single senator from the state of Ohio? Why would Peter Teal even care about a single senator from Ohio? Did Vance even do anything to really push Teal's agenda as a senator? No, this was always done. part of a bigger setup. So the next phase that we

have is twenty twenty three to twenty twenty four. This is where the coronation is essentially complete. In June twenty twenty four at a San Francisco fundraiser, tech billionaires were asked who Trump should pick for VP. David Sachs, Chamath, I can't pronounce his last name and others had the same answer. jd vance the fix was in silicon valley was about to put their man one heartbeat from the presidency so here are the key points if you actually look at vance's senate performance in he immediately became trump's most vocal defender he attacks ukraine aid which

is teal's position he promotes tech deregulation he begins questioning democracy itself which I'm going to get into that in the next part of the presentation. I'm going to introduce Curtis Yarvin. On Thursday, probably, I'm going to do a whole episode on Curtis Yarvin because he's another one that people need to understand. He's absolutely critical to understanding technocracy, the right hand path of technocracy. And so at this point, Even with Doug Burgum in the room, by the way, they all say Vance. So to go back to this whole issue.

But in any event, at this point, he's clearly not representing Ohio. He's actually representing Silicon Valley based on his performance in twenty twenty three. These are not positions. These positions questioning democracy, promoting tech deregulation, even attacking Ukraine aid. Those are not positions that are aligned. with the people of Ohio. Those are not even popular stances there. I want to go back to a little bit this. So then now the next step is there's a fundraiser in San Francisco. This is June six, twenty twenty four. David Sachs hosts it at his mansion. They raised twelve million dollars in one night. Trump asked the room who should be VP.

Sachs and other tech titans say pick Vance. Even with Doug Burgum in the room, as I just said. This is where J.D. Vance was picked by Trump as VP. twenty twenty four at a twelve June six, million dollar fundraiser at David Sachs home. In San Francisco. Further to discuss Teal's influence and all this behind the scenes. Teal was making direct calls to Trump. He was also calling through intermediaries like David Sachs. Also, Jacob Helberg, Palantir advisor, was pushing Vance. It was a full coordinated campaign by the Teal Network.

It wasn't just endorsements. It was an active lobbying campaign. So in exchange for picking Vance, Trump The Trump campaign raised a whole bunch of money. And then, as you can see, contracts to Palantir, people like David Sachs, a lot of strings being pulled and a lot of other people being put into place. So this fundraiser happens, again, timeline June sixth. The selection officially happens July twenty twenty four. Trump announces Vance at the Republican Convention. Elon Musk immediately endorses immediately. Excellent decision. We'll get back to that. This is also part of the technocracy and also part of the fact that all of

this is highly coordinated. The Teal Network celebrates, more tech money starts flowing, promises of hundreds of millions of dollars. Silicon Valley has now officially bought this position. Technocracy has officially bought the VP. November, twenty twenty four, the Trump Vance ticket wins January twenty twenty five. Vance becomes the vice president. J.D. The Teal project that started with a Yale lecture. Is now complete. So let's follow the money. Because when you track every dollar from Peter Teal to J.D. Vance, you see this is not about politics. It is a hostile takeover of American democracy by

Silicon Valley billionaires and technocrats. Let's discuss the flows of money. Teal gets Vance a job at Circuit Therapeutics, a favor to a portfolio company, an investment of Teal's. Brings Vance into Mithril Capital through direct employment. Major investor in Vance's Naira Capital. To a Senate campaign, untold millions through various PACs for VP run. total tens of millions directly traceable and there's much more that's not traceable through five oh one c fours and a whole variety of other relationships and peter

teal kind of pushing people and pushing favors behind the scenes and donations that show up as other people network effect of this is teal recruits other billionaires to support vance we already discussed david sachs one million to the senate campaign host the trump fundraiser where vance was ultimately selected by trump mark andreessen gets involved eric schmidt then gets involved even though he is a democrat the entire paypal mafia is a line behind vance then there's the dark money pipeline the rockbridge network funded by Teal Allies, Per Aspera Policy Group, which is also Teal-controlled, two hundred thousand dollars to Vance,

multiple five-oh-one C-four organizations, A five-oh-one C-four doesn't untraceable millions. have to disclose its contributors and is not limited in the size of the donation. They can't endorse candidates directly, but what they can do is they can support specific policies and there are all kinds of ways you can essentially endorse a candidate through these kind of dark money things, but not with an explicit, we endorse so-and-so. So there's a pretty big ROI on this. Vance promotes crypto deregulation, but of a very specific type. Again, as you look at the crypto policy,

I mean, I don't think anybody here, none of you actually think Trump architected any of his crypto policy, do you? I mean, obviously, he's very clearly outsourced a lot of his policy to others, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. But I mean, in his case, he has a horrible track record of picking really bad people. The fact that we have backdoor CBDCs through the Genius Act, the fact that the Clarity Act is going to tokenize and centrally control our stocks, bonds, and commodities is not an accident. These are the people pushing it. Vance pushing it. David Sachs being positioned as crypto AI czar. These are the people, Howard Lutnick, that are drafting and

designing all of this crypto legislation, which is, I've stated many times on many episodes, is not pro-liberty. It's not pro-crypto. It is pro-technocrat. It is pro-authoritarianism. It is pro-centralized control. He advocates for the breaking up of government and creating opportunities for privatization. Again, I'm not going to necessarily disagree with that. The concept of breaking up government and eliminating government functions is a good idea. But the privatizing of it

and the way that he's suggesting it is not reducing the effect of government. It's privatizing it in the hands of technocrats and a movement towards AI. Every position, in fact, benefits Thiel's business empire, all of these policies that have been drafted. So this isn't one billionaire and one politician. It is the entire Silicon Valley technocracy. It is the PayPal mafia. Thiel is the architect. Vance is just simply the vehicle, and they don't even hide it anymore. Again, there's no distancing. Thiel's talk tonight about

the Antichrist is not open to the public. It would be great if somebody actually filmed it. But I think that if people did hear this talk, and the more you dig into Peter Thiel, you would think Vance would want to distance himself. In fact, if the people knew the truth, he would distance himself. Vance is only forty years old. He has decades of potential presidency ahead and political force and pull. Thiel's building similar relationships with Blake Masters and others. He's creating a farm team of tech-funded politicians. I started my first company I'm a serial entrepreneur. in the mid-nineties. There was a period of time where I didn't know better. Had I not met with a hundred and fifty VCs,

gone through the process of going public, met with people on Wall Street, if I had this propagandized view of Silicon Valley, I might think this is a good idea. I've written other articles about this. I used to think I remember in the nineties, I mean, I would read these books about hackers and various things. I mean, there was a period of time where Bill Gates was positioned as somewhat libertarian early in his days at Microsoft. And then you dig into it and you find out how Silicon Valley works. And now, if there ever was a truly libertarian time, that ended in the nineties, by the way, if there was. Silicon Valley in the eighties was In fact, California was Republican

and the pockets of VCs that were investing at the time were actually kind of libertarian Republican-ish. But now over half of money coming from venture capital firms or invested into venture capital firms comes from public pension funds, comes from university endowments. This is why it's woke. And they're building companies now that are designed for government contracts. And you now have the Silicon Valley companies hiring thousands of lobbyists, literally having offices in DC to do this. This is not what Silicon Valley used to be, but it's kind of like when I say America,

one point O is over. We have people that think America one point O is the declaration of independence. When in reality we have social credit systems through the tax code of backdoor CBDC and a digital ID. It's a massive disconnect from our perception of who we are and what reality is. That's exactly what's happened with Silicon Valley. So when Peter Thiel said, I no longer believe in freedom and democracy are compatible, he meant it. And now his handbook candidate is vice president. So the question isn't whether Silicon Valley is trying to buy our government. They already have. The question is, what are we going to do about it? So I'm bringing this up, I mean, in the context, again,

of the Charlie Kirk situation to say this is just another element of the strategy to lock up the election. Just like vance ran in ohio trying to tie off of his roots but was really representing silicon valley he's now trying to get in front of the charlie kirk audience to try to secure that vote as well but look at what he's actually pushing behind the scenes I find it unlikely that charlie kirk would be interested in pushing a technocratic agenda but very, you know, scripted,

Vance is doing everything that he can to pull in all of these networks. he is almost guaranteed to win the I mean, election. And I will talk about Musk for a second. Remember, Musk put forward Doge and people thought, oh, he's actually going to save money. I knew he wasn't. People got pissed. I said this. He never intended to save money. He was wearing this dark MAGA t-shirt and hat. He was pushing an ideology, which I will talk about, that involves Curtis Yarvin, Peter Thiel, and J.D. Vance. So then when he said, oh, well, you know, Congress is never going to save any money. They screwed me over. That's not going to stop him

from connecting Palantir to the IRS data and allowing Doge to be the conduit between Palantir and all of the data and information on American citizens, which will be tied to Real ID. This is not about government efficiency. It is about technocratic control. And then a few weeks later, after stating he was going to form this America's Party that had a platform that said, we're going to use AI for the military, AI to make government more efficient, basically a list of technocracy things. He said, oh, I'm not going to do that. I'm going to back J.D. Vance instead. And again, I called this. I stated when he announced he was going to do this, I'm like, no, he's not. He's going to come out and

he's going to endorse J.D. Vance. They're laughing at us. I mean, like to them, the technocracy takeover is already complete politically. And I'm not telling you all of this. to encourage you to vote or to think that you're going to change. There's not a goddamn thing you can do to stop the election. Just like coming out of nowhere with no political experience after having bashed Trump as a never-Trumper in the state of Ohio, they were able to massage this to raise millions of dollars from Silicon Valley and get a Trump endorsement. Now he's already the heir apparent. with a Trump endorsement for twenty twenty eight.

And now he has the entire PayPal mafia, including Elon Musk. it wouldn't even matter who he was Again, or what his background was at this point. He's going to win the election because the voters don't know anything about any of this and they're going to control to get out the vote. But we do know. A little bit about what he will do as president. because he has been a puppet for Teal's interest, and we know a little bit about his ideology. So now I'm going to talk about Curtis Yarvin a bit, but only in the context of Teal and Vance. Probably on Thursday, I'll do a whole deep dive on this guy. Yarvin is incredibly important. He is Yuval Noah Harari of the right.

But both are promoting technocracy. So people think that there's a division. People say, again, Alex Jones, we've defeated the globalists because Klaus Schwab has resigned. We've defeated Harari. No. He's been replaced by Curtis Yarvin, who is pushing the same ideology, but he's using different propaganda, and he's convincing people from the right. So here is a short... video from a debate, and I listened to this entire debate, it's on YouTube, where it was Curtis Yarvin and this guy from Microsoft, and the point was, Curtis Yarvin is proposing that America needs a dictator or a CEO, and that that's the only

way to fix things. I'll go into more of that, but here's a small clip of what he had to say about this in his closing remarks from the debate. In our closing round, each of our debaters once again stands up and makes an argument uninterrupted by appealing directly to you. And Curtis, you're up first with your closing. And again, reminding everybody, our question is, should the U.S. be ruled by a CEO dictator? Your closing, please. Thank you. Thank you, everyone. I'm trying to sort of go through the points here that I think have been sort of that we've poorly descended into. I think the most important point is essentially, I think that when Glenn

sort of kind of comes back to his studies and his results over the last two hundred years and so forth, I would say he's not thinking very scientifically, because he's essentially looking at history through this massive fisheye lens, where he sort of wants to essentially destroy all evidence before the year or so, and he says, because they didn't have the internet and antibiotics and computers, we can sort of forget about anything they learned in this period of time. And I'm like, no, actually, because they had to run a government without the internet or computers or phones, actually we can see how impressive the results were. And there's an example of this that I like to sort of

give in terms of the fall of the Roman Republic, because I think that there's, we sort of heard this consensus idea out there that the fall of the Roman Republic was because, you know, authoritarians took over. You know, actually the fall of the Roman Republic was because the military system of the Roman Republic was much, much more effective than the civilian system. And the way Rome really found that out was that not even Caesar had appointed this guy called Pompey to basically extirpate the pirates from the Mediterranean, which was like ending the drug gangs in Mexico. And they were like, we have failed to do this with the Roman civil system. Let's do it in the military way.

top-down command, without any computers or guns or cell phones or whatever, as soon as they adopted the monarchical way of doing things, Pompey clears the Mediterranean of pirates in three months. It's very, very similar to Bukele in El Salvador. Here's a thing that basically people said couldn't be done, and it was just done, and people are like, wait a second, we need a new system of government, and that's what created the Roman Empire. And I think that if that hadn't happened, Rome would have been destroyed by the Gauls probably in about fifty B.C. Well, most of us, you know, there's a lot.

I encourage you to watch this. I'm writing an article right now for The New American about Curtis Yarvin. It'll probably be done by the end of the month. And I've been doing a ton of research, reading all of his stuff, watching. a lot of his interviews, and most people have not heard of him. I actually was talking to people this weekend. Almost no one had heard of Curtis Yarvin. And again, I was speaking to people that are very knowledgeable at these events, Brownson event, Chris Martinson event. these people are not normal people. I mean, These are people that are cutting edge with this stuff. Nobody's heard of this guy. So while most of us were on Facebook,

you know, in two thousand and seven, software engineer named Curtis Yarvin was writing a manifesto to end democracy. And while most people weren't hearing about it or reading it, Silicon Valley's most powerful people were. And so, you know, he basically started a blog called Mencius Moldbug in It was originally anonymous. two thousand and seven. And he wrote a blog called Unqualified Reservations. And that sounds like a pretty harmless name, but in reality, it was a blueprint to replace American democracy with a techno-monarchy. And he's not a random crank. He's a legitimate software engineer with a pretty significant technical background. So he introduces this

concept called the cathedral, his term for media, universities, together to maintain power, which, and government working of course, a lot of his descriptions of the problem are accurate. It's his solutions that at least I disagree with. And I think the more people learn about them, I think most people would disagree with them. But he does do a good job of laying out what some of the problems are. His idea is that democracy is weak and inefficient and corporations are a superior model. America needs a CEO, not a president, someone who can fire everyone and start over. And I thought this was interesting. He's the one who actually coined the term red pilling for politics before the

alt-right adopted it. So in two thousand and nine, a couple of years after he starts. Writing this blog, Peter Thiel publishes an essay, say the saying, I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible. Well, this isn't a coincidence. Thiel is already reading Yarvin. And again, Thiel's not just rich. He's connected to every power player in Silicon Valley. In twenty twelve, Yarvin writes the Rage Manifesto. Rage stands for retire all government employees. And a quote from this manifesto, if Americans want to change their government, get over their dictator phobia. they're going to have to

if Americans want to change their Again, government, they're going to have to get over their dictator phobia. It's not metaphorical. He's actually literally saying fire every single federal employee. Now, by the way, I wouldn't disagree with fire every government employee. I just wouldn't replace them with anything. And that is not what he is proposing. And in fact, the more you read about this, his idea is let's give complete authority to a powerful technocratic CEO. By the way, if you look at the timing here, Vance is who they've been J.D. building the path for. And then J.D. conduit to turn over Vance is essentially the

government to AI and the technocracy. So he's trying to replace the people loyal, replace the current people in government to people or AI systems, I would add. loyal to the new ceo dictator so in we know teal has already been following and amplifying yarvin's message teal invests in yarvin's company tlon through founders fund and yarvin goes from being an anonymous blogger to a silicon valley insider So by we have an anti-democracy philosopher funded by a billionaire who agrees with him,

but they're missing one thing, a political vessel to carry these ideas into power. So now we're in the next phase of this. Thiel's dual investments. So Peter Thiel doesn't just he invests in people. invest in companies, And when he invested in Curtis Yarvin, he was investing in an ideology that would eventually reach the White House. The Tilon investment, so Teal's founder fund invests in Yarvin's Urbit project through Tilon. And it's not just money, it's Teal publicly backing a known anti-democracy advocate. Urbit is pitched as a decentralized internet, but really about creating parallel systems outside of

government control. But this is one of those decentralized in order to centralize again type of scenario. So in twenty sixteen, Yarvin claims he's been coaching Thiel. They actually watched the twenty sixteen election returns together at Thiel's house. Yarvin calls Thiel fully enlightened, meaning that he gets the full anti-democracy program. This isn't just patron-client, it's an ideological partnership. So in short, Yarvin is to Thiel what Harari is to Klaus Schwab,

except that Klaus Schwab is just an academic that doesn't really have any capacity to execute. At the same time, in parallel, the Vance grooming is going on. So Thiel's been grooming JD Vance since In twenty fifteen, Vance gets a job at Circuit Therapeutics. Twenty sixteen. Teal brings Vance into Mithril Capital. Twenty nineteen backs Vance's Naira Capital. This is a ten year cultivation project. And then in twenty twenty two, Teal drops fifteen million on the Senate campaign. Also funds Blake Masters. And so now, you know, here we are. Teal's not only bought influence, he's actually at this point creating a movement.

And every Teal company becomes a recruitment ground. So PayPal, Mafia, Palantir, Founders Fund, they're all connected. And now Mark Andreessen, David Sachs, and Elon Musk are all reading Yarvin. So here's where it gets interesting. In, in twenty twenty one, JD Vance goes on a podcast and starts quoting Curtis Yarvin by name. At this point, the philosophy goes public. So now we go from Yale to rage. This is where the ideological transfer happens. How do you get a hillbilly memorist from Ohio to

embrace the ideas of a monarchist software engineer? You run him through a Silicon Valley conversion machine. So we've already talked about Vance meeting Thiel at a Thiel talk at Yale, and then later going on to say this was the most significant moment of his time at Yale. This was his red pill moment. And again, remembering that red pill was, in fact, a term coined by Yarvin. So the Silicon Valley baptism is from two thousand fifteen to two thousand and seventeen. Vance is fully immersed in Teal's world, learns the venture capital game, begins learning the Teal-Yarvin worldview.

And surrounded by people who think democracy is obsolete and again, democracy. I'm not a fan of democracy. But governments should not be corporations. The whole point of at least having a government is to protect rights so that people can create corporations. I mean, there's a whole fundamental flaw in even the purpose of government. The purpose of government is not simply to maximize profitability. There's a lot of flaws in Yarvin's thinking, but I'll do that. actually address Yarvin specifically. I'll address that when I So Hillbilly allegedly is

literally just propaganda. It wasn't even written by Vance. It was turned into a Netflix movie. this was literally part of the I mean, shaping and crafting his image for higher office. And he starts openly citing Yarvin, and he's really completed a transformation from a Romney Republican to a revolutionary. And the concepts of Yarvin that Vance adopts are the cathedral. So he takes... The Yarvin attacks on university and media as coordinated enemies. And if you look at his talks, this becomes part. it's clear that he's being directly I mean, kind of scripted by

Yarvin's ideas explicitly. And uses a lot of the same language. Our people, the idea that you need loyalists, not professionals, the strong man solution, someone who ignores courts and Congress, all of this. is being crafted by Yarvin. So Yarvin's been putting out there this idea of democracy sucks. We literally need a dictator, literally stating we need a dictator to fix the current situation. And then starts influencing Vance and Thiel. And these ideas didn't just start to get into the public consciousness. They've been out there for years and they've been percolating. people amplifying these ideas now. And there are a lot of other

So in this twenty twenty one podcast revelation where he first starts talking about Yarvin, he says, there's this guy, Curtis Yarvin, who's written about some of these things. Fire every single medieval or excuse me, every single mid-level bureaucrat, every civil servant. When the courts stop you, say the chief justice has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it. This is a mainstream candidate openly advocating, ignoring judicial review. This point, the mask is completely off. now we have a philosopher billionaire and the and the politician all aligned so how do you act how do you actually implement these ideas well this is where twenty twenty four comes in now again let me contrast

this approach to what I've been talking about maybe episodes when we talked you know a couple of about first principles this isn't really, they're not really taking a first principles approach to this. I think America one point O is over and I'm more interested in discussing, okay, what should these first principles be? Did they make a mistake in the first principles? Have we learned something in two hundred and fifty years? And whatever the outcome of those discussions, interpreted differently by which by the way will be different people, people can experiment with different things from a broad based discussion about first principles. not having a discussion about first principles they

already know what the outcome is their world view is you need a dictator to come in seize control and seize control for the purpose of implementing a technocracy they've already decided what the outcome is and that outcome is technocracy so now let's move into the next phase of this the podcast prophecy. In July, J.D. Vance went on a podcast and laid out exactly what the Trump administration should do if it returned to power. It was pure Curtis Yarvin.

This interview was with Jack Murphy. It was a small podcast, not mainstream. This is where the real plans get discussed. By the way, I mean, that is true. This is why I don't go on. I don't even try to go on mainstream podcasts, but It's niche podcasts where you can even have these kinds of conversations. So it's on this Jack Murphy interview. He thinks he's talking to friendlies, so he's candid and directly names Yarvin and lays out a specific plan for the Trump term. And again, it's the rage implementation. Fire every single mid-level bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, the entire federal workforce. Replace them with our people. Loyalty over competence.

This is Yarbon's rage concept word for word. The constitutional crisis plan. When the courts stop you, he knows it's illegal. References Andrew Jackson defying the Supreme Court. The chief justice has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it. Literally advocating for the president to ignore the judicial branch. It's the end of checks and balances. And again, I think our current system is unworkable, but the difference is that the solution should be something that we talk about from first principles. This is not what this is. This is a, we're going to take this over, and they know what comes out at the end. We know what the end solution of this is. So he uses a lot of depathification language,

which was comparing it to removing Saddam's loyalists in Iraq or denazification after World War II. But he's talking about career civil servants, EPA scientists, FDA researchers, State Department diplomats, framing normal government workers as enemy combatants. Dan, I don't disagree with that. But this is one of the problems that I have. Let's even take a look at what's going on. with Maha and let's look at what's going on with public health. On the one hand, we are firing some of these people, people from the CDC and everything else. And that on the surface looks like cause for celebration. Who did we replace? They just fired the head of the CDC. Who did they replace it with?

Somebody from Peter Thiel's operation. What is being talked about now, which was not talked about on the campaign, which was definitely not part of Maha. I have never, I know a lot of Maha people. I have never heard people talk about AI mandates and the integration of tracking wearables. I know a lot of these people, a lot of the hardcore Maha people, a lot of the people that before it was called Maha, but the people that have been in the medical world, freedom community for twenty years you will not hear them talking about wearables or ai that was not part of the conversation so here's what happened and this is going to piss a lot of people off maha was hijacked this was

an opportunity in a way to take all of the medical freedom people put them behind trump but they're implementing this strategy that vance talked about on this podcast yes they are going to wipe out a lot of these shitty people from the fda and the cdc but they're going to replace them with their people and their people are silicon valley people and their people are ai people and I've said this time and time again replacing northrop grumman with palantir is not a flex replacing big pharma with ai in silicon valley is not a flex and it's certainly not medical freedom and that's exactly what's going on I fear that everybody that's well-intentioned and spent

a lot of time and effort poured out their hearts and all of their time and money to push medical freedom are going to end up with AI and medical technocracy and complete medical tyranny. And in fact, that looks like it's already happening. So I'm sure that's going to make some people upset. Watch what's happening. Look at who the people are that are being put into these positions. So again, I cheer the concept getting rid of civil servants but I promote the idea of replacing them with nothing not ai not people that are loyal to you but nothing it's twenty twenty five why do we need these functions what are we getting out of these captured regulators we're taking captured regulators

and replacing them and capturing them with different organizations that is not in my view, the role of government. And that's certainly not something that's going to promote or defend free will. So this is being accelerated. In twenty twenty one, Vance makes these statements publicly. Twenty twenty one is when he stated these things on a podcast. Twenty twenty two wins the Senate seat with Teal's fifteen million. Twenty twenty four becomes the VP nominee at a twelve million dollar fundraiser at David Sachs's house. And in twenty twenty five, he's second in line to presidency recently coming out and saying kind of oddly, it's kind of like he went out and said, well, you know,

if something should happen to Donald Trump, I want everybody to know I'm ready to take over. Kind of an odd thing to say, so here we are, three and a half years from podcast to power, and this brings us to January twenty twenty five, where all three men converge at the inauguration philosopher, the billionaire. And now the vice president. I think I actually skipped one of the slides. Actually, that was supposed to be the slide that we covered. Anyway, nevertheless, now we're at the inauguration. So at Trump's inauguration, Curtis Yarvin was treated as a, quote, informal guest of honor. The anti-democracy philosopher who started as an anonymous blogger is now being celebrated at the

highest levels of power. Yarvin attends an inaugural gala, not hiding it anymore. Politico reports his outsized influence over the Trumpian right, although, you know, it's Politico. He's described as an informal guest of honor. So everyone knows who he is at this point in time. The Vance encounter. Yarvin claims Vance called him a reactionary fascist at a party, but Yarvin said he doesn't think he meant it in a bad way. This is how normalized these ideas have become. They're joking about fascism at inaugural parties. So the implementation began. Trump immediately starts firing federal employees,

attempts to end birthright citizenship by executive order, ignoring court challenges exactly as Vance prescribed. Doge also pursued Yarvin's efficiency ideas. Schedule F to reclassify federal workers, making them fireable. And again, those aren't even bad things, right? Again, there's, I mean, the problem that we have is this government actually can't be fixed. So I don't even take issue with some of these proposed solutions. It's just that you have to understand that they're doing it for a reason. The intention is to replace it with something. The people that are loyal to them are people that are loyal to Silicon Valley. These are people that are loyal to Palantir. These are people that are

loyal to big data and wearables. So at this point now, there's a Yarvin victory lap. He's now writing openly about the CEO dictatorship model to the point where that clip that I played of Yarvin is from a debate from nine days ago. They're literally having debate topics where the topic is him defending why the United States needs a dictator CEO. He has fifty seven thousand subscribers to his newsletter. He's been referenced by Tucker Carlson. He now appears on major podcast ideas that were fringe in two thousand seven are now mainstream on the right. Democracy itself is now openly questioned by major political parties.

But this isn't about Trump. And again, it's not about Trump at all. Trump is literally just the vehicle. Trump is a very easy vehicle for them, right? They manipulated this enough. I talked about this in another podcast. I mean, Thiel intentionally put a whole bunch of money behind people that he knew were going to lose in the midterms, but he did it just because they were loyal to Trump. and so that he could repair help repair vance's image and help tighten his relationship with trump teal had already backed trump in and actually palantir had helped trump in the campaign and so this whole thing has just been trump's not that hard to

manipulate if you have a lot of money and you stroke his ego trump is a pretty easy guy to play trump is not a visionary You can say a lot of things about Trump. He is not a visionary. He is motivated by ego and he's motivated by money. He's a great target for Silicon Valley. He's a great target for technocrats. So this is about replacing democratic government with corporate authoritarianism or technocracy. Yarvin provides the philosophy. Thiel provides the money. Vance provides the political power. This isn't even being hided. Project Twenty-Five incorporated many Yarvin ideas.

Supreme Court already weakening checks on executive power. Tech billionaires are increasingly embracing anti-democratic ideas. This is a coordinated movement to end democracy as we know it, and they're telling us exactly what they're going to do. So when someone tells you they want to end democracy and install a dictator, believe them. When they get billions in funding and reach the vice presidency, prepare to fight them. This isn't a conspiracy theory. It is their openly stated plan. And what are we going to do about it? And again, more to come on that. My solution is, my version of fighting them is exit and build decentralized systems. But if you're not starting to understand

This was never about efficiency. It is always about taking technocratic control and power. I will be documenting this more when I go deeply into Yarvin, deeply into Thiel, deeply into Musk. This isn't about entrepreneurial heroes trying to save free speech and save America. This is ideologically driven. And to not understand that it's ideologically driven, you will get rug pulled every single time. You'll be one of these people, I was shocked. I really thought Doge was going to save money. Go look at my feed. I told you Doge was never going to save any money. It wasn't intended to save money.

So with that, I mean, you know, the whole theme of this was, was supposed to be, looking at current events through a technocratic lens. So I wanted to give the backdrop so that you could understand a little bit more maybe about what JD Vance was doing hosting the Charlie Kirk show. And more importantly, let's take a look at what the response has been in the last forty eight hours to the Charlie Kirk assassination. In many ways, this is the perfect crisis This is forty eight hours to tyranny. And I'm going to say this, that, again, I don't think that these people had anything to do

with Charlie Kirk being assassinated. That's not it. This is a never let a good crisis go to waste scenario. Sometimes these people are actually involved in false flags, but but more often than not, they just opportunistically take advantage of a situation that comes up. to push policies push bills push legislation that they've already had drafted that moves us towards technocracy that moves us towards more surveillance that strips us of more of our rights so let's look at what's happened within forty eight hours of the charlie kirk assassination multiple pieces of legislation suddenly appeared they weren't written in response to the tragedy they were already sitting in drawers waiting

for the perfect crisis and now they had one Within hours, not days, coordinated legislative push. We have Senator Mike Lee announcing the Charlie Kirk Act, which is revival of the Smith-Munt Act. We have the White House requesting fifty eight million dollars in emergency security funding. We have Marco Rubio announcing a visa revocation policy within twenty four hours. We have Texas Governor Abbott creating Campus Speech Committee the same day. Too fast to be organic. It's a pre-written playbook. These bills in some form existed before the assassination. It's a classic shock doctrine. Use trauma to push forward tyranny. It is never let a crisis go to waste. Same as Patriot Act.

Same as the CARES Act. It's the same as every crisis. Let's use emotional manipulation while people are grieving. So again, I certainly want to know the truth about what happened. I doubt we'll ever find out what it was but just look at your feet on social media and you tell me this isn't complete division whatever the division is it's being fractured all over the place and the technocrats love that because everybody's pissed and everybody's afraid and now even people that are supposed to be all about freedom all about free speech all about a whole variety of things are encouraging a whole bunch of different behavior. And this is happening at the federal and state level. It's Republicans and

Democrats pushing the legislation. The media amplifying need for emergency measures. There's no time for debate. We must act now. Fifty-eight million dollars is tied to a November twentieth shutdown deadline. Creates artificial urgency. Pass it or government gets shut down. No time to read the bills. No time for public input. vote while the emotions are high and why logic is low. Let's look at the first piece of major legislation, the so-called Charlie Kirk Act. They're literally using his name to destroy the very free speech he championed. It's actually shameful. Charlie Kirk spent his life

defending free speech, and now they're using his death to destroy it. The Charlie Kirk Act is not honoring him. It's betraying everything that he stood for. So let's talk about this. The Smith-Munt Act was an act passed in nineteen forty eight. Originally to ban government propaganda domestically, it was weakened under Obama, but now it's being restored. But with massive expansions. So the idea of banning government propaganda sounds like a great idea, And they're using a piece of legislation that sounds like it's banning propaganda is a good thing. But you actually have to read the bill, just like the Genius Act and all these other things, the backdoor CBDC.

And they managed to twist the whole thing into people thinking that this is about promoting innovation and not about financial surveillance. And the Federal Reserve is the bad guy. And there will be no financial surveillance, even though it's Congress that actually pushes the financial surveillance. They're doing the same thing with this Munt Act. Under this new Charlie Kirk Act, it's the government that defines what misinformation and incitement is. So there will be fines for media outlets and platforms, but it's vague language. Anything could be deemed incitement. So today's protected speech is tomorrow's crime. And even again, if you like this idea because of this particular situation,

If you're a Republican, imagine how you'd like it if it were Obama that was pushing this. Because again, imagine this is giving more power to government with vague language over what can be controlled and what can be fined. Republicans think that it targets radical left rhetoric. Democrats think it will control right-wing extremism. Both sides are cheering their own censorship. Government doesn't care about party, just cares about control. Once the power is granted, it will be used against everyone. Trump has shared a viral video supporting it. His supporters don't realize they're next. Just like the one big beautiful bill and the hundred and fifty billion dollars that's going to AI

surveillance and the militarization of the police. Oh, yeah, we're going to crack down on the border. It's going to be used against you the next election cycle. And none of this will be taken back. Power you give Democrats today, they'll use tomorrow. There's no limiting principle once censorship starts. Kirk fought for campus free speech. He challenged mainstream narratives. He would have been censored under this act. Using dead patriots to destroy their principles. It's emotional manipulation at its worst. At its worst. Mike Lee, you're an asshole for doing this. But censorship is just the beginning. They need surveillance to enforce it. So this is where the fifty eight million dollar

security package comes in. Now, let's move to this. Fifty eight million for security, security for whom the emergency funding isn't about protecting politicians, it's surveilling everyone who might become one. Here's the money breakdown. Fifty eight million in emergency supplemental request. Executive, judicial and legislative protection. Advanced surveillance tools. AI threat assessment tools. Drone deployment systems. Personnel increases. And hey, you know what? Who wants to bet? Do you think Palantir might get some of these contracts? I mean, it's only fifty eight million. So at this point, it doesn't even matter. It's pretty small scale. But here we are.

big emergency and now we get more drones we get more ai threat assessments there's a drone mandate there is a congressman that is pushing for a mandate to have drones at every political rally now I know a lot of you may be emotional right now I actually know charlie kirk I've worked with charlie kirk going back to I'm certainly not happy about what went on, but I know, and he certainly knew, the last thing he would want is a mandate for drones at every political event with AI-assisted real-time monitoring,

not just for watching shooters, but for collecting data. Are you kidding me? I'd like to see in the comments, I'd like to see anyone who thinks this is a good idea defend why this is a good idea. Every attendee catalog filed and assessed. Your presence, a permanent record. The threat assessment expansion. AI determines who is a potential threat based on social media associations and history. This is pre-crime detection going mainstream, which, by the way, Palantir already does. with local law enforcement. Speaking out, threat score increases, guilt by algorithm. And then they're tying this into the representative Melissa Hortman who was killed.

Pattern exploitation, never just one crisis. Stacking bodies to stack law. Every incident adds urgency. No time to think, only react. And I know I've seen a lot of people are like, oh, this is different. Then they're homing and they're using, oh, this is a turning point. They're actually playing off of that. So now this is an emergency that's going to create a permanent infrastructure. This emergency funding will become a baseline budget. Every temporary measure becomes permanent. Surveillance is never dismantled. And each crisis adds a new layer. This is the ratchet effect. It only ever goes in one direction. I've talked about this with financial surveillance. Since the bank secrecy act,

every new piece of financial surveillance has been added, has never been retracted. None of this is going to go away. Do you really think any of this is going to go away? Are we going to sacrifice? Are we going to take Charlie Kirk and use him as an example to take away more freedom for security? It's disgusting. And they're not just watching for violence. They're watching for wrong think. And this is where the anti-Semitism laws come in. So we're not done. We're not done with just the Charlie Kirk Act. We're not done with just fifty eight million dollars for surveillance and drones. No, this is just the beginning.

Now we have the anti-Semitism trap. And I don't have a slide for this, but I don't know if you saw this. Marco Rubio took less than twenty four hours to announce visa revocations for glorifying violence. But if you read the fine print, it's really about controlling criticism of Israel and expanding the definition of domestic terrorism. So here's the Rubio speed run. Announces visa policy a day after the assassination. Equates glorifying violence equals questioning narratives. Explicitly ties to combating anti-Semitism. Netanyahu immediately

supports from Israel. Kirk's pro-Israel stance is used as a justification. There's no legislative process. It's just an executive action. Now, all of a sudden, we have the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act revival. S. five five eight. Suddenly back from the dead. This is Tim Scott. Tim Scott's bill. IHRA definition makes Israel criticism illegal. Title six enforcement on campuses. Federal funding tied to compliance. At least Rand Paul warned about these speech restrictions. But, of course, as usual, they've been ignored. an ongoing campus crackdown

texas committee on anti-conservative violence investing celebrations of kirk's death funding cut for non-compliant schools mandatory reporting of bias incidents every professor every student under watch academic freedom dies with thunderous applause although of course I would argue funding should be cut for all schools not compliant or non-compliant but what a weird What a weird set of things that are being rolled out in quick order. Again, this is stuff that's been sitting there. A lot of these are bills that are being revised, things they're calling it the Charlie Kirk bill. But make no mistake, that one's been in the hopper for a long time. And now is the time. People are fearful.

People are not thinking. They're not using logic. So if you criticize Israeli policy, you're an anti-Semite. If you question the narrative, you're glorifying violence. If you attend the wrong protest, your visa's revoked. You post the wrong opinion, you get a federal investigation. Oh, and I know some people that listen to this podcast have experienced that as well, and they've spoken about this. Support for Palestine equals support for terrorism. There's no escape from these expanded definitions. Republicans protect Jews and conservatives. Democrats fights hate speech. ACLU opposes but is drowned out. Both parties united in censorship. Only winners are those in power.

And this is how it becomes permanent. A select committee to investigate radical left influence, but really to investigate anyone who dissents. So where are we? Permanent emergency achieved. Problem, reaction, solution. They needed a problem. They got Charlie Kirk's assassination. They needed a reaction. They got public fear and anger. And now comes the solution they've always wanted. Permanent emergency powers in the end of the First Amendment. House Freedom Caucus creates an investigation committee, the select committee. Chip Roy is leading the charge for permanent probe. Subpoena power over all social media platforms. Command can demand any data, any time.

Radical left influence equals anyone who disagrees. New McCarthyism with text enhancement. Section two thirty repeal pushes back. Lindsey Graham ties it to the Kirk assassination. Platforms must censor or face liability. Section two thirty is there to protect platforms to allow people to protect free speech. So it doesn't treat the platform as, for instance, an editor. but actually holds the platform responsible for the opinions, well, repeal of it would hold the platforms actually responsible for the opinions expressed by the people using the platform. So the government doesn't need to censor directly. Private companies will do it to avoid lawsuits. And again, as someone who spent five and a

half years in a two hundred and seventy million dollar lawsuit for conspiracy to commit defamation, I will tell you, I guarantee you, I know what will happen as a result of this due to the insurance contracts that the platforms have. They will be required to comply with this or they will not be able to get coverage. It's literally a complete lockdown and guarantee. This is a direct path to censorship laundered through corporations. Then we have the resolution vehicle, H. Res. seven oh two honoring Kirk. Amendments adding surveillance measures. Who votes against honoring a dead patriot? It's emotional blackmail as a legislative strategy.

It's a Trojan horse for tyranny. We're talking about the permanent state. Emergency measures never end. The surveillance infrastructure will be permanent. Speech codes become normalized. The next generation will grow up with censorship. Temporary becomes, that's how we've always done it. No sunset clauses, no review periods. So the winners are government, tech companies, and surveillance contractors. In fact, the winners are the PayPal mafia. The winners are Peter Thiel's circle, represented by JD Vance. The losers, every American citizen. The left thinks they've won because they've censored the right. The rights think they've won because they've censored the left. Both lost everything,

and the technocrats laugh at all of the useful idiots on both sides. Charlie Kirk died defending free speech. Now they're using his corpse to bury it. The question isn't whether they'll succeed. They're already succeeding. The question is, will we let them? Because once these emergency powers are granted, we will never get them back. The permanent emergency isn't coming. It's here. And all this has happened within forty eight hours. So, again, I'm not going to talk about or speculate Who assassinated Charlie Kirk, but what is happening in his name is indefensible. And this is what there should be outrage about. So if you're getting all pissed off and you're divided into the right or

left category or it's this agenda or this agenda, just understand your rights, as usual, are being stripped. And your emotions are being played upon. All in the name of Charlie Kirk to do the exact opposite. what he spent his life doing and he spent all of his time doing going all across the united states having open debate and open discussion fearlessly with people on critically important topics imagine going from that to drone surveillance and ai analysis of people at these public events shameful so that's what I wanted to talk about current events through a technocratic lens.

It's getting a little late in terms of the part of me talking. Usually I would bring people on. I'm going to skip through some of this. I do want to talk about freedomforge.io. In particular, because I continue to make updates, it's still in the alpha stage, but coming off of the experiences that we had in my talks and hundreds of people that I spoke with over the last week. I want to bring back these workshops. So I'm going to focus on specifically the part of the website at freedomforge.io that is regarding the workshops.

So I will pull that up right now. So you can take a look at that. You can go to freedomforge.io and click on workshops. what I really want and I'm looking for here is is feedback so once again you can join this site and set up a free account and participate there's an area here for you to suggest additional workshop topics so here's at a high level what I'm trying to do my goal in all of this is to as quickly as possible onboard as many people as possible to using these private decentralized solutions. And that's not just getting a wallet and having a privacy coin that you can use to buy and sell things. This is building out an

entire parallel infrastructure. So again, everything that the technocrats are creating, centralizing stock markets, tokenizing all of everyone's assets, Further taking over control of health care. Further taking over the food supply. Because that is what's happening. I'm sorry. You're not getting medical freedom. You're getting J.D. Vance bringing in Peter Thiel's people to push AI through the force of the state. You will not get medical freedom. Wake up. I can't say it any differently than that. That is what is happening. And you can get mad about it, but, you know... I get I get sick of you know saying oh gee I was right and then everybody's lost that much more freedom so I

get no solace in being right this is now time to build and this site is a resource one of many resources that that can be used but I hope the most effective resource at building counters to technocratic threats. So with respect to these workshops, so again, on this site, I'm going to have online guides that will guide you through that already guide you through how to download a wallet, which wallets to download and structural videos. And I'm going to always make all of that information available for free. My goal with this is not to maximize the amount of money that I make. I don't make money on any of this.

But I want to become more effective at getting this information out there. With that said, I will tell you, and for those of you that are maybe already digital natives or who have been in crypto, you have no idea what it's like talking to somebody that's never been in crypto before in terms of the level of knowledge and understanding. We do a horrible job of onboarding people. and a lot of our tools and resources that we may think are easy to use are not user friendly and a lot of the terminology is very difficult so some workshops are needed I can only do so many workshops because there's only so much time and frankly I'm balancing trying to educate people about technocracy,

which isn't just me educating people about technocracy. It's more I want to onboard and bring in other people. I want to help amplify Patrick Wood and Courtney Turner and other people that are doing much better work than I am and have a lot more information, but they need to be amplified. So that's part of what I'm trying to do. But the technocracy thread is one part of it. And then actually building some of these things myself, in addition to trying to help others build In a couple of areas where I have specific domain expertise. So I'm trying to, within that context, balance and make these workshops effective. So these workshops can be online. And what I have found, by the way,

is the interactive live interactive part is crucial. I mean, I've written books with detailed instructions before and as many guides as I can give. And that will get some people, but there are a lot of people. I mean, I met a lot of people this weekend. that are actually incredibly wealthy, incredibly ideologically aligned. A lot of these people have been working on parallel systems at the local level, but this information is just above their head in terms of the way that it's been communicated. That's not their problem. That's our problem to solve. And so I want to do this through workshops, but I have people all over the country now, again, that want me to come out and do workshops.

But if I go out and do a workshop with twenty or thirty people, I mean, this is my wife and I going out and traveling. I mean, it's expensive. I mean, it's going to cost us a few thousand dollars actually just to travel out there. But then the opportunity cost, because as we saw last week, my ability to do podcasts, these podcasts reach thousands of people, increasingly larger numbers of people. So then I have to now balance. trade-off here so so these workshops cost money not that I'm making a huge amount of money we broke even on the workshops that we did this was not a a profitable excursion I could have charged more money but again my purpose is to maximize the number

of people that we on board so I've outlined here the subject areas for the workshop. When I did the four-hour workshop before, the first half of it was about technocracy. And again, I even may make online courses available as well in addition to webinars. There may be a combination here where it's like, take this online course, and then there's a live Q&A. So in other words, we can maybe get thousands of people to watch the online material, but they will still have questions. So then there's a live interactive thing. I mean, I'm open to many ideas, but these are the areas that I want to focus on. I don't want to spend two

hours on technocracy. I don't want to spend any more than a half an hour in a live workshop talking about technocracy because that information can be consumed That information doesn't need to be consumed live. I mean, we can play prerecorded versions of that. In fact, maybe even have as a prerequisite that you watch such and such before attending. But it is useful to have a like a thirty minute. All right, here's what's going on right now, because it happens so quickly. Again, like, you know, in the talk that I did yesterday, I mentioned the fact that Elon Musk tweeted, he's like, well, we're not going to have universal basic income. It's not going to be basic.

It's going to be much bigger than basic. The amount of stuff that's coming on in real time, I mean, again, now that you have Curtis Yarvin willing to go out and host debates about why America needs a dictator, I mean, the mask is completely off. And it's shocking. So the ability to show people, hey, here are Five things that were said by these people in power last week is helpful, and it's necessary to understand the sense of urgency. But beyond that, the workshops are about helping people achieve financial independence. This is what people are interested in. How can they build wealth in businesses that operate outside of the traditional financial system? So this is going to be

talking about here are the kinds of things that you can tokenize. Here's how you can accept Zeno, Freedom Dollar, Bridged, Bitcoin, and Ethereum and other assets for your business. But also here's how you can create completely new industries and businesses that are tokenized on Zeno. So not just accepting it as a currency, but building... I always bring up as examples, but we're probably going to incubate it ourselves to start, my wife and I, the food, global food marketplace and global healthcare marketplace. Using tokenization and ultimately escrow systems and reputation management systems. So many things and businesses that can be created. So I want that to be a part of the workshop.

I want people to come to the workshop and start learning. and come away thinking about, oh, this is how I can start building my complete life in this other system because the fear works and they trap you with these systems and they trap you with these mandates, but there's so much opportunity available. teach people how to master their privacy, which should be a big one. And it's not just about shielding your information from the government. It's about shielding your information, frankly, from other corporations, these big tech corporations, and shielding your information from other bad actors who might find out that, hey, you have a million dollars worth of Bitcoin and they

come to your house with a gun, kidnap you, force you to move your coins, and then murder you anyway, which happens. Talk about that yesterday. and then discuss how to build parallel systems. And so this site goes into some detail with the ideas that I have and the topic areas. I'm going to actually ultimately give the ability for you to kind of rate each of these individual items up or down if you're a registered user. But also, there's an area here for you, again, if you're a registered user, to suggest additional workshop topics. So all of this, everything that I do is going to be based on demand, and it's going to be based on how I can use my time

most effectively to reach the largest number of people to have the biggest impact on the ecosystem. And I spent a lot of time this summer just really examining the stuff that we've done over the last year, year and a half. what's worked, what hasn't worked, where are we with the ecosystem? And so this kind of reflects, you know, what we've come up with so far, but it is all driven by, I want feedback. I want questions. I want comments. The more critical, the better. I mean, again, all I care about is effectiveness. My metrics are effectiveness. If we look back on this and it's like we have ten new businesses or ten new categories where people are creating things on Zeno and

there's this much more adoption and more people starting to exit the banking system, those are the things that I care about. So, you know, again, I'm sure, however, this is structured, the in-person events will be structured so that, you know, at least they're break even. And if, you know, any extra money that I make, I'm going to pump into investing into incubating other projects, but this is not, this is not a, a, uh, this is not a profit center. This is, there are, this is one of the least easy ways to make money, but I'm doing this because this whole thing is about optimizing freedom. And my wife is telling me I have a very wonderful and

understanding wife. Who's in this with me, yes. So freedomforge.io. Please check it out. Please log in. Somebody says, what's the best way to send feedback, ideas, and workshop questions? So you can go to freedomforge.io and... go to the workshops tab, register your account, and then once you register an account, there's an area for you to submit your ideas. And if there's ever anything wrong with that, I'm approachable, just reach out to me on X and send me a note. Again, all of these sites I'm building myself, I work on all of them a little bit each day.

I'll do probably a separate talk on how I'm doing all of this because AI is an interesting thing. be a force for tyranny but it's also amazing in terms of how it can enhance your ability particularly with respect to coding I mean I've been able to code all these sites myself and you know I have administrative dashboards I'm like designing these it's been helpful that I've run tech companies before because even though I'm a mediocre coder I I've actually run tech organizations with developers and dbas and everything so I it that actually gives me an ability to use the ai pretty effectively. And I actually want to share that knowledge with people as well, because I think we can

actually incubate a lot of these projects very quickly. But anyway, you can do this at freedomforge.io, workshops, set up an account, submit your feedback, or just reach out to me directly if there's anything wrong there. So with that said, Gab.com lost its ability to process foreign payments. Yeah. I mean, look, um is isn't andrew torba from gab creating a parallel system I don't know he might be uh you know somebody commented bitcoin's still working for them in those counties I look you know again I I'm I'm focused on privacy bitcoin is completely transparent I mean it may

be better than being debanked in some cases but We really need privacy-based alternatives to stop this. And I don't know what the Gab guy is doing, but I will tell you this. If you're doing it as a corporation, it's dead in the water. I was actually at an event where somebody was working with Donald Trump Jr. He used the word parallel system. And then when I looked into what it is, it's like, okay, they're trying to create like a shopping club. And there are pitches that while it's not Amazon.com, you're basically buying products through us, but you're still using credit card. That's not a parallel system. Creating a competitor to Amazon is not a parallel system. Creating something that

doesn't require government and that doesn't require banks, that's building a parallel system. Those are the parallel systems I'm interested in. And by the way, on the Freedom Forge site, You can also submit ideas if you register for business ideas, projects that you would like to see built. and I will be developing this out because my whole point is not to build these projects myself but to help connect other people to connect investors to connect developers and to really start taking just the idea of tokenization and turning into into reality turn these into businesses into parallel

systems that are real counters to technocratic threats And I know it's difficult. I've actually put a couple of other ideas on that I'm going to experiment with myself, see if it's difficult to code. There's something called XMR chat, Monero chat, where when you're doing, for instance, I'm using StreamYard right now and we have a comment thread, you can actually send me a tip using Monero. If you go to XMR chat, I'm going to see how hard it's going to be to build something, a Zeno chat, where you could actually send a super chat message using Zeno or Freedom Dollar or bridged assets through confidential layer. That's one idea.

Zeno fund, a crowdfunding system, that's another idea. Potentially bridging Ravencoin into Zeno. That's another idea that I think could be useful for creating a parallel system for tokenizing equities. So Ravencoin is great as a system that allows things like voting and messaging to shareholders and everything else. It was built for securities. The only issue I have with it is that it's a fork of Bitcoin and it's all transparent. If you could bridge Ravencoin... In Tozano, you could actually get all of the useful and necessary functions of Ravencoin, but you could also get privacy. That's something that I put on the list. It's just as an idea stage. But again,

I want to compile a bunch of these ideas. And I don't care. I'm not worried about giving away ideas so that people will steal them. All of this stuff has to get built. I'm not concerned about that. I'm not concerned about trying to capture all of it. I hope there are a ton of competitors. I hope there are many people building these things. just getting these things going and showing people how it can work, that's what I want to see. It's actually a bit of a loss if I have to build some of this stuff, although in the healthcare and food freedom categories, those are areas that my wife and I have a particular passion and interest in. and knowledge about. So those are ones where if

no one else is going to do it, I absolutely will do it. But if somebody else that is even better wants to take a crack at it or wants to partner, great. Again, this is not about maximalism. I hope in any way, shape or form, I hope to see many, many projects, many collaborations as quickly as humanly possible. So with that, again, every one of these episodes, I'm going to go into and I'll be talking about each of the three areas. And so each episode will have something about either a new Zeno how-to guide or tokenization project or some kind of update. These sites will all be improved. I am accessible. I want to get the conversation going.

If you have questions, again, there are no stupid questions with this. I know sometimes a lot of people are like, wow, he knows a lot about this. And it may sound intimidating. I don't want it to sound intimidating. I want questions. I want to learn how to communicate this stuff more effectively. And I've been in front of a lot of audiences and different crowds. And for those of you that are already in crypto, I'm telling you, sit in front of one hundred and fifty or two hundred boomers that have never used a crypto wallet before. And when you see what their questions are, you realize how much work we have to do to make the stuff easier to use. We will only be successful in this.

At the end of the day, if we can build products that are as good or better than the technocrats and understand these technocrats are not government. They are Silicon Valley people. They are people like Peter Thiel. They are people like Elon Musk. They know how to use technology. And understand this, if you're sitting there saying, well, these people just, there's just no interest in adopting technology. They've already adopted technology. People are already doing twenty seven trillion dollars worth of stable coin transactions. Banking is already almost exclusively digital. That is not an excuse. When I used Bitcoin in twenty twelve, it was better than anything

that existed as an actual product. It was faster, cheaper and easier to use than traditional finance. All of that has been lost. The actual crypto product and process sucks. We lost based on not creating. So far, we've lost because we haven't built good products, because we formed niche groups that want to outdork each other on how unusable their shit is. I mean, just very candidly, we have to actually compete with technocrats. We're not competing with government. So this stuff needs to be easy. Ernie Hancock talks about this all the time, the Grandma Just button. You have to make this. That should be the goal.

There should be passion about how easy we make this, not about how hard we make it. So it's an ongoing process. And by the way, for me, the more I'm in on this, the more time I spend on it, I mean, great. Now I'm coding every day. That makes it harder in a way for me. to be able to communicate some of this stuff. It's very easy to get caught and go into the weeds. So anyway, I'm looking for your feedback and, and I'm sorry, Ben, I am encouraging a sense of urgency. This Charlie Kirk thing is being weaponized in a horrific and disgusting way, but there should be a sense of urgency, but not a sense of fear, a sense of urgency that

hopefully motivates people. building we can have a better future a lot of these events too and a lot of talking to people is a lot of people are like hunkering down like it's gonna be it's gonna be hunger games it's gonna be really bad you know what if you put your attention towards it being survival you're gonna find yourself in a position where you need to survive if you put your energy towards creation I think we can come out of this where everything's better. In fact, the more you examine how things actually work and how, you know, already eighty percent digital slaves we already are, I think we can come out of this better. And it isn't about, I've got to be honest with you, this idea,

oh, I'm going to grow my own food and sew my own clothes, that's bullshit. Voluntary trade is a good thing. We don't have to throw out the idea of voluntary trade just because trade has been captured by technocrats and the state. Voluntary trade is a phenomenal thing. But we need to take it back. And we need to make it real voluntary trade. And we need to make it something that's private. We need to make it something that we own and that we choose to do on our terms. So with that, this has been a long, I don't know, series of rants, but I'm going to open this up now to Q&A.

You know, talk about anything. Certainly would like to talk about, kick it off by talking about these topics. What you think of my assessment about Charlie Kirk being hijacked for Be curious to hear your opinions on that. Curious to hear your opinions on freedomforge.io and technocracy. Freedomforge.io is a counter to technocracy threats, what you think of the site, what you'd like to see in the workshops. In fact, by the way, Leah, in your comment, I mean, what's the best place to send feedback? You can send feedback right here now also.

or you can hop on if you want to hop on. I know a lot of people don't necessarily want to do the live chat. You don't need to show your face. If you just want to speak, that would be fine. You know, we've never, I've never booted anyone from here. I mean, so far people have been very, have kind of followed the general rules of just human rules of being considerate. And so I look for, I like the live interactive stuff better. Actually, sometimes even sending messages in a form or whatever, it's hard. And with some of this, because it's technical, I know it may be even difficult to frame a question. I know for me, sometimes it's easier to talk than it is to write or I can write,

but then I find myself endlessly editing. Whereas, you know, you can just shoot off a comment or jump in live. um and that that would be great so I'm happy to see that uh work together setting up your food supply torba was from silicon valley and been setting all this stuff up you were talking about it would be great great I you know I'll I'll take a look at it and um and we'll reach we'll reach out I I know I signed up for gab at some point it I don't want to be you know I don't want my impression of using Gab to necessarily be a reflection of the possibilities of working with this guy.

But I will say, there's a Silicon Valley... There are a lot of approaches and a lot of people want to work within the existing system. And this has been a source of, it's not frustration. I understand it. I get it. Like a lot of people, a lot of people just want to, they're actually just trying to maximize Fiat or, or they think that we've got to bridge. We do have to bridge the existing system with these new systems, but I kind of look at this the way Apple did, you know, Apple's kind of like, you know what, we're going to stop adding all of these ports. We're just going to design products that are easy to use. Whereas PCs were like, well, we're going to keep all of these ports and keep all

this stuff open because these people might want to use this or that. And I mean, I think Apple, I liked Apple's approach better on this, but, um, In any event, I don't want to spend time. Other people can spend time doing that. Somebody needs to spend time building the actual parallel systems for when the cord is cut. And that's where I want to spend time. So if I say I'm not going to work on a project, it may be for that. And I'll tell you, for that reason, it's not that your idea is bad. I just have a very specific focus. And I am acutely aware that the thing that I have the least of is time. So I will try to make that clear with the language. Because I know a lot of

people come to me with certain ideas. Understand, I'm trying to counter the threats of technocrats. And we need to build those systems. And I'm not seeing anyone building those systems. I'm seeing a lot of people build some alternatives. Frankly, in crypto, I'm seeing a lot of people build nothing and who think that holding on to a... hijacked non-fungible digital surveillance gold if they hold on to that long enough the world will change that's unfortunately a waste of energy of people that could be building things but it is what it is I'm just very focused on this thing I certainly will recommend other projects in the ecosystem and I'm happy

for people to be developing anything but I'm looking for people that want to build these parallel systems and that are that have this passion about it too And then understand we're not going to comply our way out of technocracy. For some reason, the live chat open panel is grayed out. Where is that? Where is the live channel, live chat panel grayed out? Is that on? Yeah, I don't know. Let me see. Yeah, I was having problems posting links earlier as well. This is hard for a sixty eight year old to follow. Yeah, I know. I mean, I appreciate that. I'm.

This is why I'm trying to refine this and. You not only make the explanations better, but also work with. Whoever the developers are on the various projects to make the make the UI. better and easier. And that, that's part of why I haven't done the workshops in a while. I stopped doing the workshops because, and you know, and I could actually understand, or I, I, I don't regret having stopped the workshops for a while. Cause when I, when I did this peak prosperity thing, I mean, a year ago we gave people the Zeno wallet, the cake wallet, and I gave them some Monero. gave them some xeno and most of them hadn't done anything with it but now

they're intrigued by it now that they saw now that I was able to present oh look now we have freedom dollar and confidential layer and all these other things now now everybody's even more excited now there's ex now there's much more interest from people that attended both years to go deeper and to really start using this stuff so now we're at a point where there is actually an ecosystem There's still tons to build out, which shouldn't be looked at negatively. It's actually opportunity for people. There's so much for people to build. There's so many opportunities. It's hard to even express what all can be built. I would send you the email he sends out if I could. He's solid on free speech

and is developing building the parallel system. Yeah, sure. I mean, you can sit here. I'll put my email address. Well, I'll say it. I'll say it. I don't seem to be having luck. It's ard at daylightfreedom.org. You can send that email. I mean, again, we're looking for people to build out everything. And you don't have to work with me. You can just build. But certainly I know that it's difficult with a lot of these projects. People are spread out all over the world. you know the development team and the people on the project are all over the place and so um you know sometimes it's hard to to get people people connected

and I'm hoping we can facilitate that through the site and through through the podcast I think that some of the regulars that join, I've just pinged, actually have conflicts tonight. Let me see. What I'm planning to do, so I have not yet consistently done a, I've only had one week where I actually did it on time on Monday and Thursday, this podcast. So I don't think anybody knows this time.

I've actually only had this podcast once on a Monday at six o'clock. I might start structuring these open discussions more. more where I have at least one or two dedicated people that are scheduled to come on instead of, and what I actually do is I put together the talk. Usually I work on it a few days beforehand, but often the topic is timely. So like I spent all day today working on the talk today because it was focused on the charlie kirk issue but in an interesting way in a through this technocratic lens so I'll spend all day

doing that and but we won't know what the topic is people don't know what the topic is and so um it's hard because I'm not going to be able to schedule things advanced it's kind of like I'm saying I know we're going to do another one on elections a month out or so I know we're going to have our first discourse on first principles at some point but, um, Oh, somebody said, I first saw you as a guest with David Knight. Oh, great. That's, uh, I hope he's doing well, by the way. I, I, I haven't heard the update. I understand he had a medical situation. I hope he's, uh, I hope he's recovering well and hope to see him, see him back on soon. Um, he's a great guy. I've, I enjoy his work.

I followed his work for a long time and, um, Very thoughtful guy and very knowledgeable guy, very principled. So it's been an honor. I think I've been on with him a couple of times and hope to be on again with him soon. Leah says, once people have the basics, they would be hooked. I think that's true now. And by the way, I actually think one of the things that is going to hyper-accelerate adoption just based on my trip, and I didn't mention this. So I use the ZBEC MasterCard that you can load directly with Zeno and I believe FreedomDollar as well. I haven't tried FreedomDollar yet. I use that almost entirely on this trip.

So we got the hotel. We got, I think, the rental car. We got some other things. The groceries. I think we got... Maybe we got some raw milk at Polyface Farms. I bought... Yeah. So anyway, the whole time, the whole trip was able to use it. Only one time I wasn't able to use it, which was buying gas for some reason. And it's because it requires... require it was yeah it was using tap to pay but it wanted a pin number and I actually don't know if that was on my end or if it was actually the the gas station but the but the whole rest of the trip was able to use that and I've been living on crypto since and a lot of that involves as much as possible I try

to buy directly with crypto but if I'm traveling I often have to use a crypto debit card and often the crypto debit card provider stops providing the debit card. There've been all kinds of issues. So in any event, I've ended up having four or five different crypto debit cards and this episode, sorry, this episode is barely playing in rumble on either of my browsers constantly pausing. Huh? You know, I am surprised. So I have upgraded everything. Oh, here we go. We have Craig. Hey Craig. I've upgraded everything here. I actually have a wired internet connection.

And so I should not be experiencing any delays of any kind technically. So if that is happening, I've noticed that we've had issues with links and some other issues here today. And I don't know what all that is about. So I'll see if it's on my end, although I'm not seeing anything, any technical issues or any bandwidth issues. So I will look into that. Maybe Rumble doesn't like the topic of conversation because JD Vance and his firm have an investment in it. And we have Craig on who knows about these things. Craig, are you there? I can't hear you if you're there. You don't seem to be muted. Can you hear me?

I think I think he's trying to get some issue with the audio. Or you can hear me I can't hear you. I'm glad we've got a couple thousand people on today. That's, that's great. The Monday. so I see craig craig is here hopefully dan will pop on as well is that oh there we go hear me now aaron yeah I

can oh I could hear you Let's try that one. Can you hear me? Yeah, I can hear you. That works. All right. This episode is barely playing in rumble. All right. There we go. I can hear you. You got a delay.

Might switch over to this. All right. I'm going over to rumble now to see if what I can see over there. All right, I can hear you. I can hear me through your through your speakers.

all right let's see I see uh okay there we go hold on is this better yeah can you hear me okay yeah I can hear you okay yeah I just have to go with the phone for some reason I haven't had luck with my studio stuff but I'll work on that with frankie again tomorrow um But yeah, great presentation tonight, Aaron. Heavy duty stuff. I mean, that's heavy hitting tonight. So I know we've talked about a lot of this, but that was quite the presentation tonight. I appreciate it. I'll tell you, I've been doing a lot of research. Even before the Charlie Kirk thing, I've been doing a real deep dive on Curtis Yarvin. And then I've been watching these videos. And man, I'm telling you,

if the average person knew what these people were saying, and listen to some of this stuff, they'd be shocked. Yeah. I mean, I've done a lot of the work and you know, the way you went into the legal stuff that was already stacked up tonight. And, uh, you know, before the assassination, that's very concerning because I didn't know about, and what we were saying, the Smith Munt act is, uh, what's that going to be repurposed as what's the new name for it, that they brought it back. The Charlie Kirk law or Charlie Kirk act. Yeah. Which is absolutely disgusting. I mean, again, when you think about who Charlie Kirk was and even what he was doing, the idea that you would give the government the

ability to define what is misinformation and so forth and then define companies, it's just, it's a hundred percent going to backfire. So you repurpose something that sounds like it is a good thing, stopping domestic propaganda. But then you repurpose it in a way that's the opposite of what the original thing did. And you use the name of a guy who promoted free speech, which is a typical government thing, right? It's like the Genius Act is a backdoor thing. cbdc for stable coins um and yeah the more I dig into all of this stuff and again the problem is that though we know this right we talk about it all the time we talk about problem reaction solution and yet even though we know and even

though they know we know it's still gonna work yeah that's the frustrating part and I you know i reading between the lines I mean you didn't say it but you know from the way I I understood when you went through all the laws and and all the stuff that they were rolling out you know mike lee and everyone else and I'm gonna have to go back and write some of that down because I'm gonna use it in my show as well so thanks for doing all that research on it but the point is know this I mean if I read between the lines aaron this was planned right I mean they already had this stuff ready to go I mean you can't repurpose laws off the shelf like that that quickly can you I mean that am I reading am I

reading too far between the lines or is that is that too big well I don't I I don't think they had it ready in the sense that they knew charlie kirk was going to be assassinated I think they had it ready and they knew something was going to at some point there would be an emergency that they could take advantage of so I I don't want to read into this that this was the charlie kirk thing was was created and fabricated to make this happen but I'm saying they had they had it ready to go and this was a perf this is a perfect vehicle for them to push it through. I mean, cause you look at all of this, this legislation, it's not like the cares act they, they created from scratch.

They had pieces of that, that they, uh, various aspects that they wanted to push through and then they just cobble it all together. There's no way you could put together that kind of legislation that quickly. These are things that they've wanted for a long time. Now they're going after section two thirty again. And, uh, you know, again, it's about free speech. I, even the anti-Semitism stuff, uh, Why is that coming up now? What does that have to do with this? And then you see both sides of this. You see people claiming that Kirk was assassinated because he was starting to question Israel, and then you have other people saying that it was Iran. I mean, the whole thing is just absurd,

but then they're using Kirk as the justification to pass these anti-Semitism things. And if you look at how broadly you can interpret the Rubio stuff, I guess in an extreme case, you could lose your passport if you say something that is deemed to be anti-Semitic. And why are they doing this? Well, and so quickly and so fast, right? I mean, this is... You know, without, look, I just listened to your presentation and, you know, it just strikes up all kinds of research to be done. But, you know, this reminds me of how I met Courtney is, you know, I watched these NACs go through and they did it between Christmas and New Year's when everyone was home enjoying their families, you know,

and they try to set up this situation where they can essentially, you know, I guess it's basically a precursor to tokenization is what they tried to pull off, right? Yep. I mean, is that a fair classification? I mean, that was essentially a precursor to tokenization. It's basically steel, you know, anything six inches below the soil, air above it, so forth, the water, whatever. I mean, it goes right out of imperial rights. You know, you just blow past all the laws, all the precedent that's been set. And, you know, it's just a takeover. And it was our own New York Stock Exchange, our own SEC. And... know this this just has that feeling I mean jd vance coming out and just coming

on there today on charlie kirk's show and solidifying the fact that he is you know I mean it's hard to not it's hard to break your case down what you're saying is hard to tear apart because we see it with our own eyes and I sat there today just wonder what is going on here today with jd vance on here and watching you know and boy I just hate to without doing without I hate to jump too far, you know, get over my skis on this, but it's very, very concerning. What I, what I watch today with JD Vance and who he paraded through there and, you know, Tucker and I don't know, it just, it just raised all kinds of red flags with me. And, and, you know, I, what do we watch for next?

I guess that's the thing, you know, what do I always say? Okay. We got a lot of dots and we can potentially connect. What do we watch for next? What would, what would we perceive what happened next? You know, to solidify what you're talking about, you know, I mean, so actually, when I when I started out with this, I started I started working on the presentation and I hadn't done the research on all the bills because I've been I was gone last week. I was out on a farm, didn't have internet access. So I so so I started the presentation with, well, here's what we would look for. This is what we would expect if the technocrats were using this as a way to cause more division. and to implement more

analysis and then I researched the bills and I'm like this fifty eight million dollars this idea of mandating drones for public events With AI surveillance and all of this other stuff. It's like, I think we're seeing it. Because I started out with the premise of this is what we would see. And then it's like, wait, they actually are doing this. I just didn't realize that they were doing this. Like, I wasn't up to speed on... Because these bills are all within forty-eight hours of... Forty-eight, seventy-two hours of the assassination. So, I don't know. More than... AI surveillance more than free speech laws, anti-free speech laws, where you could potentially lose your passport based on

your speech more than like, I don't know, you know, it's. I guess I'm at the point where I don't know how much worse it can get with real ideas, a digital idea, with the backdoor CBDCs, the Clarity Act. Larry Fink was talking about last week how excited he is about the tokenization of stocks and bonds. So when I spoke at the Brownstone Institute, there were four hundred people there and most of the people there were there because most of what Brownstone has been doing was talking about the lockdowns and COVID stuff. that's the majority of of it and then I'm kind of like this I'm the only guy there talking about financial stuff And so, but this is, it's a sophisticated group.

This is not a, these are not normies. None of these people are normies. And when I gave my talk, which was a forty five minute interview with Jeffrey Tupper, where there was no preparation, I had no idea what he was going to talk about that. Jeffrey, that's not how Jeffrey works. He just kind of, you know, we just, he does the Q and a cause he knows, he knows obviously where I am on, on these issues. I'm looking out at the audience and their eyes were dropped. Their jaws were dropping when they heard me. talk about, even what I just said, it hadn't occurred to them to think that real ID is a digital ID. Almost no one has heard of the Genius Act. This was true both at this

event and Chris Martinson's event. Almost no one's even heard of it. And no one, zero, have heard of the Clarity Act. So everybody's stocks and bonds are about, and by the way, Chris Martinson's group, this is a group, Chris Martinson has been ahead of the curve. I learned about a lot of the great taking stuff from him. So his audience, he has a very sophisticated audience of people that are really hands-on. So unfortunately... This information is not getting out. I mean, I've been talking about it and I've got a few thousand people listening right now, but I mean, I'm not, there aren't many other people talking about this. And when you add together the combination of what

they're doing with tokenizing assets, adding AI surveillance with the one big, beautiful bill and everything else, I don't know what else much more we could be looking for. They're executing everything and they're doing it all at once. They've got to be laughing at this. I'm not even kidding. They have got to be absolutely laughing at this. When Curtis Yarvin is now – he went from originally being an anonymous blogger operating under a pseudonym – in Silicon Valley to now doing publicized debates under his own name where the title of the debate is, you know, basically why America needs a dictator slash monarch.

And he's publicly defending the position with public buy-in and support from Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, Marc Andreessen, and others. That's how blatant it is. So I don't know what the next signal could be. I mean, I think it's all here. The problem is, how do you communicate it? And I do realize, I know I'm going to alienate people. And the single biggest point of alienation, and by the way, I realize this has been a source of friction with me and others that are somewhat like-minded, has been calling out Elon Musk. The one thing that's happened that is at least

somewhat encouraging is I think the combination of the failure of Doge, but I actually think connecting Palantir to the IRS, that caused some damage. That caused people to start thinking about it. But when he formed America's Party and then backed off of that and endorsed J.D. Vance... People are looking at that as they've really created Vance in a phenomenal way. This guy has been constructed... brilliantly and it shows the deviousness you know it's not so I'm going to do the thing about I think I'll do Yarvin on Thursday I might not do Yarvin on Thursday I'll wait and see just because I think it might even require more research I'm writing this big

article for the New American for the end of the month and I've been heavily researching it so I'll decide on Wednesday if I if I feel like I've got if I can articulate the picture well enough. But once you put the pieces together and the specifics and you connect the dots with Vance, Yarvin, Teal, and Musk. And I guess I would say David Sachs has to be another of the really big players in this. And you connect everything. It's just like, oh my God, we've been played. And we've been played over two decades. And they have absolutely been playing the long game. Again, when you look at the narrative of what it took to get Vance to where he is, that was crafted. That was not, that didn't,

that wasn't organic. And that wasn't emergent. That was planned. Yep. Well, and I think I told you, I did some investigating, right? Being here in Central Ohio, Narya Capital is Narya One and Narya Two, right? There's two rounds. Well, there's one in Columbus. There's one in Cincinnati. And I think I told you that, you know, I went to see the one here in Columbus and it's a front, you know, it's a rental space. I mean, they do weddings there. They do banquets. They do rental office space. There is no Narya Capital there. There's no lady sitting at the front desk. There's nothing, you know, you would expect for a hundred million dollar, you know, venture capital firm,

you would have someone, you know, I mean, I know today's a digital age, but you would still think you'd have someone manning the, you know, the office, right? There's nobody. It just, it feels like a total front to me, Aaron, you know, the whole thing, not only that, but, you know, let's not forget that, that Narya one was a big investor in strive capital, right? I sent you that link to strive capital. Remember that one where the guy was promoting the Bitcoin and strive capital was started by Vivek Ramaswamy and that guy. So again, I think Ohio is a big passenger for a lot of this stuff. And, you know, that goes into, you know, and I think we've talked about this too,

you know, the Erebor Bank, right? That Peter Thiel, Palmer Luckey. And here's where I want to go with this, right? Peter Thiel, Palmer Luckey, and Joe Lonsdale. Okay. So that's Palantir, right? Joe Lonsdale. And Palmer Luckey of Oculus, who sold that to what? Was it Microsoft? Made seven hundred million dollars. Facebook, I think. What's that? I think Oculus was sold to Facebook. Did it go to Meta, Facebook? Okay. Yeah. And then, of course, Peter Thiel. Well, then, you know, the thing that I think about is Palmer Luckey. I mean, he's got a target date. If you watch what he says closely, right, he's this guy that's now building the drone technology. And, you know,

what do we have going over Poland? Right. We have these drones coming through Belarus. You know, we have these drones coming out of Iran. You know, we have these drones. And so I just think, you know, in some ways, Aaron, I feel like, you know, a lot of this, too. I was wondering, what is this all about? And I thought maybe it's a big diversion. to move troops onto the Russian border, because this would not hurt the technocrats, right, to have a war. I mean, I don't know how all this stuff connects, because that's old neocon stuff, right, the war. You know, I don't know how the technocracy ties into the neocon type, you know, war machine. That's one that's, I don't know if you have

any thoughts on that at all or not. You know, is the technocracy so big that it's now controlling the neocon, you know, efforts, or is that still a separate, you know, war machine that's running on its own still? Yeah, that's a good question. Because it sure looks like it's being invaded. It sure looks like it's being invaded with Palmer Luckey and types like that. Well, it is being invaded. And there was that consortium of eight different AI tech, like Palantir, Andral. There were eight of them that were, as a group, working together to bid on defense contracts. So, yeah, no, I mean, they're overrunning the administration. And clearly... They own Trump. I didn't even realize all the ties.

I didn't realize until I was doing the research for this that it was a single twelve million dollar fundraiser that Trump was present at at David Sachs's house where that was the moment that J.D. Vance was selected as VP. I mean, look, I knew in general that the influence was there, but you can actually pinpoint specific times and dates. I mean, you look at the influence of Sachs and Thiel and J.D. Vance. In fact, not the influence. They're driving the strategy, right? Trump isn't looking at any other sources of information. This is directly the information. Trump is not, as I said, he's not a visionary strategist. or strategic at all, these are the people,

one hundred percent driving, the entirety of the strategy, so, yeah, I wouldn't be surprised, with whatever's going on, in Russia, and by the way, I haven't even had time, I have no, I actually have no idea, what's going on in Russia, because I was, traveling, and didn't have internet access, and then working for the show, I don't even know, what's going on with Russia, I'm like, my information's a week old, on that, yeah, my guess is, it's not even being reported on, at all because of the charlie kirk thing yeah well and that's the thing I was kind of hoping you know that jack posobik because if there's one thing jack posobik's done it's focused on poland all this time and

you know obviously he was close with charlie kirk so I thought maybe he would you know make a connection there but he didn't you know I mean he was definitely mourning you know when he was on charlie with with you know real america's voice and so forth last week and You know, it's hard to get intelligence. I mean, some of those guys are connected. You kind of hope that some of them can pull through and actually deliver on the intelligence of what's really going on in Poland right now, because we're at a pretty critical spot. I mean, they're sending forty thousand troops to the border and obviously it's a target point. You know, it's a false flag. It's got false flag written

all over it with these drones because you can't track these drones. These are I mean, it's not like they have numbers on the tails of the planes. Right. I mean, these things come in. Now they know because they can read, you know, whose digital signature it has, but we don't know. They can lie to us so easily with this stuff, Aaron. You know, we don't know who, right? How can we prove that this was somebody's drone or somebody else's drone? It's all what they tell us. We have no ability to determine anything. It's all technology. It's all, you know, it's all GPS based, which we control none of. It's all satellite driven, which we control none of. It's all, you know, intelligence.

It's all military. It's all we control. We see none of that. We're totally, you know, we never we never got an answer about what happened with New Jersey with all of those. Right. Like that was an unsatisfactory response. And we still don't actually know what happened. I mean, the official story, where did the official story end up? They were our own drones? I'm not even sure that's true. I don't even know. I don't know to what extent we actually have great military intelligence one way or the other. But I do think that, I mean, I look at these proposals and the fifty eight million proposed by Trump. And again, it's just another it's going to be another win for Palantir.

And I will tell you, I mean, this podcast is going on the same time that Teal's giving the first of his Antichrist talks. But the more you dig into... So I now want to look into his... What was the name of Teal's program for kids out of high school where he was trying to suggest, you know, don't go to college. I'll fund your idea. Oh, yeah, yeah. Yeah, he's funded quite a few people like that that dropped out. Which, by the way, again, so some of these on paper, I don't even disagree with these ideas. I mean, that does make sense. I mean, I think people going to college, smart people shouldn't go. well I mean nobody should go

to college at this point but but he was basically targeting the smartest people in the country and and the based on the way that it looks like what's happened with vance he's basically he invests in people not particular projects or ideas yeah teal fellowship yeah teal fellowship and um I think I got to get the site up with that maps all of these technocrat relationships because of something like this. But it's clear Teal is strategic and he is a chess player. And it's very clear that he's grooming not just J.D. Vance or not just a few people. He's playing the long game here.

And I think it'll be... On the one hand, I want to say it'll be fun to map out, but I think that the more it does get mapped out, it will... It should put more urgency on... everything that we can do to build these alternatives I guess I can't stress enough the urgency of this and I can't stress enough how I don't sense the urgency from other people I will say at this brownstone thing I had people come up to me like okay now they're they're pretty frightened yeah courtney's uh courtney's on she says um he invested in yarvan too in urbit Yeah, no, I did. I mentioned that. And yeah, it's crazy.

The timeline though, the timeline of Yarvin and his blog and when this was, when the influence happened and then when Teal came out and said, you know, he was opposed to democracy and everything else. Now we have the whole kind of timeline of the connection with Yarvin and Teal and Vance. And then I think the more you map out the whole network, The answer is the same. We've got to start building these parallel systems, but we really are in a situation where I don't know what the popularity numbers are, but my guess is that Vance probably has really high approval numbers because they've managed to... If you can manage to convince the people in Ohio that a guy from Silicon Valley...

who's representing Peter Thiel in Silicon Valley and voting for Silicon Valley interests should be elected to the U S Senate, then you can pull the rug over anyone, right? Or the wool, I should say, mixing my rug and the wool rug. But, but now, now, now they're trying to, now he's hijacking the Charlie Kirk audience and, So I don't know. I don't know if anybody's even pulling his popularity numbers, but my guess is they are through the roof. Yeah. Yeah, I agree. I think he's effectively unopposed. I don't even know if he's going to see much, if any, real primary challenge. And, you know,

it's kind of like the formula for Ohio was Teal's money plus Trump's endorsement. Well, he's going to have Trump's endorsement plus Teal's money plus Musk's money. How do you overcome that, given what I talked about last week about how elections work? And how they're driven by propaganda and get out the vote, not about the substance. It doesn't matter who the candidate is. It only matters who controls the get out the vote apparatus. And that is also Vance, which I'm sure he'll get an added bump from Palantir on the get out the vote part as well. So... So he's a lock for twenty twenty eight. And I mean,

I can't even say how much different it'll be than it is now, because I would argue he's effectively running this and running it. I say running it as a puppet for Teal and the PayPal mafia. But I mean, it's not like Trump is putting up any resistance right now. Right. I mean, can the technocracy go any faster than it is? I actually don't. This is the thing. I don't even think it could go any faster. had Harris won and they announced that they were launching a CBDC, they wouldn't have as much traction as they have having captured stable coins. If Harris had won and said, we are going to implement real ID, there would at least be opposition. So they've managed to pull this whole thing off and

people don't even know about it. Again, the Clarity Act finds, I can't find anybody who's heard of the Clarity Act. Well, we watched it. We watched it go on, you know, with who was it? Brian Steele. You know, he's the Wisconsin congressman who pushed it through Bill Hagerty, who pushed through the act. Right. Those two were big pushers on those acts. And yeah. You know, we talked about it at the time and, you know, I think it will, we have to map this thing out, Aaron. You know, we have to get together and map this thing out, this technocracy, you know, map, because it'll pay off in spades as we go through this stuff. You know, just keep adding to it and understanding it as things unfold.

Because I see things every day, you know, and it's like, where do I attach that? You know, I'd love to have an attachment point. Like, where does that belong? You know, I see stuff all the day in the financial media The problem is nobody's really fighting this on the financial front. You know, you're so swamped by, you know, Bloomberg and CNBC and you can read through the lines. I mean, you'll see people come on and they will say things that you're like, wow, like, I can't believe he just said that. The problem is, where do you attach it? There's no place to attach this stuff. You know, you know, it's like writing a book. But but it's it's you know, it's like I would love to

work with you on that. Right. Getting that the map out on the technocracy, because. I just really think it'll help make a clear picture. And people, it makes it a lot easier for people to understand it. Like you say, on board people with these different platforms, same kind of a thing. If they understand how this technocracy works and they can see the picture of it and you can lay it out and make the connections, people don't have to understand the whole picture, but certain things they've spent time with or they understand and they see the connections and they're like, okay, I get it. I'm on board. You know, I understand. Yeah, well, and again, the thing that I've learned is that

If you expose it, but you don't have an alternative, then actually you're contributing to the demoralization. And at the Brownstone thing, I had so many people that came up to me that said, wow, I'm not even kidding, jaws dropped. And they're like, wow, this is horrifying. I had no idea. And these are not normies. So that means... We've got a lot of work ahead of us. And I think, again, I think Musk is a white knight. I don't think Teal is necessarily as much perceived as a white knight, but Musk still has the white knight vibe going on, largely. Some people are starting to question him, but not really.

I mean, it's kind of brilliant in a way, right? Because he was a darling of the left until he switched. But then he went out against Trump. then probably bought back some of his dem credit and then where does he put all of it he puts it all towards vance so um so that's going to be the biggest challenge and then and then I would love to be able to show algorithmically look look I have found the social media thread to be unwatchable and I can only imagine how they're tweaking it for rage bait and in fact all you have to do is look at what elon himself is posting to see that he is directly engaging in rage baiting so

I would love to see how their algorithm is being tweaked for this and by the way I found my my traffic just stopped like right after the assassination like whatever it was I posted it was just I'm not saying it was shadow banned but it just I because I'm I don't think it was just me but my guess is unless you were talking about charlie kirk it wouldn't even get any reach that that that seemed to be the case I mean I was finding posts that would get you know, fifty views? Like, how does that happen? So it was... It's clearly... It's not that they're trying to suppress me in this instance, but the algorithm is tweaked up to absolutely go all in on rage baiting.

And so, I mean, you see a quote from Laura Loomer saying that it was Iran, and then you see a quote from somebody else saying it was Israel, and it's like, okay, they're just... know people often say who's the civil war I mean I did write a post this morning I said it's not fifty fifty red versus blue or republican versus democrat or anything else it's actually point zero zero zero zero zero one percent technocrats versus everybody else but they managed to take this issue and create ten different fifty fifty splits Are you red versus blue? Are you trans versus not trans? Are you Israel versus Iran? And so all of that is going on simultaneously. And then the amount of

people that are jumping up and saying, well, now this is a turning point. Now we have to physically remove these people from society. All of this is being algorithmically engineered. Very easy to play off of emotion in a situation like this, particularly with the video and how brutal the video was. Well, and I, you know, I was talking with someone today about this, you know, when you take away someone's, the way to take away someone's curiosity is to install an algorithm. When you install an algorithm and you can't, you know, we're pattern recognition, you know, human beings are a lot of pattern recognition. We see something happen. And we say, oh, you know, it resulted in this.

We see something happen and we say, oh, it resulted in this, you know, and you start making that connection. Pretty soon, you know, you have these synapses that fire in your brain and you're like, oh, OK, when this happens, that equals this. You know, the problem is these algorithms, you know, work. you can't figure them out. Right. So what does it do? It just strips your curiosity, you know, and you basically give up. It just strips your brain. Right. Of the ability to solve problems. And we're not far from this happening here and where they'll just start stripping people's curiosity because you can't figure out there's no pattern recognition anymore. This algorithm is running in

the background and there's nothing you can do about it. You can't fight it. You know, I mean, it is what it is and you can't change it. You know, we talked about this a little bit at Rumble, you know, I mean, Rumble, where, you know, it's like, you know, we're going to talk to a prominent a well-known attorney, you know, this week about this kind of stuff. And he's having the same problems. He gets capped at fifty thousand views so he can't go viral on X. You know, he's seeing these issues. How do you know you can't you can't fight that. Right. You get all of a sudden you have something that's a great topic. You know, people want to know about it. And then you get capped at fifty thousand.

Same thing with, you know, you pay for play. You know, if you don't have the money and you don't know they have the right contacts. And again, remember, who's a big investor in Rumble? J.D. Vance. And J.D. Vance, right? Through Naria Capital. Yep. Yeah, I mean, I think you're right mapping this. So I'm doing that. I was doing the technocracy mapping last because it's the hardest to do. And so as I'm doing these other sites, I'm becoming more efficient at development. That's why it's been delayed. So I've launched the Aaron Day site, the Freedom Forge site, the Oh Nothing site. So I am going to do it, but it'll actually end up being faster because I will be more proficient by the

time I get to focusing on that. But you're right. People don't know that. People do not know that Teal... advance or investors people don't know that true social uses rumble right like there's just so many of this that again when you see don't forget our buddy howard letnick don't forget howard letnick how he ties into the point I know. I just, it's, you know, the thing is, it was really easy for one of the things that the right or MAG or whoever you want to call it would glom onto is, oh my God, Hunter Biden was on the board of Burisma and look at Nancy Pelosi doing insider trading. I mean, that stuff is nothing compared to the blatant corruption that's going on,

whether it's the Trump family and DeFi and meme coins or Lutnik and Tether or the PayPal mafia. It's like these things are orders of magnitude worse and they get no discussion. Now, some of it is that it's more complicated. and that's a problem like when I did the interview with the daily mail it was like five hours of back and forth and they had to talk to a bunch of uh lawyers and and then somebody from the new york times financial press or whatever it's like so that's an advantage they have because these are technical topics and so the so the media can't cover it because they don't know how even if they wanted to which they don't yep

Um, I definitely, you know, sooner, sooner, I guess I could do my end and then whenever you get your part ready, we can just plug it into that. But I would love to lay that out and confirm it with Courtney and confirm it with Patrick and confirm it with anybody. We can get, you know, information on have everybody check it over, make sure that it. checks out and and then put it up for test for the public right let them pick on it you know let all let all the viewers you know all your viewers so forth pick on it and see what they can contribute I mean it's a group project right it's just the more we can involve the groups yeah Yeah, yeah. It's a group project. And the whole point of it is

to crowdsource and to even indicate what percentage confidence that we have in these connections and to have that be something that changes over time. And as you get new information, in other words, if you map this thing out, you've made ten different links, but then you find out one thing is false. then that changes the whole picture. So the idea here is that you've got a dynamic picture that's changing in real time and that your confidence changes as you get more information. And that's the best way to approach it. So it's certainly not... I'm just trying to seed it with a bunch of data and then make it... as as useful as possible for

for people to contribute to but I mean I you know in fact I'm even kind of calling it it's an open source palantir uh to to fight the technocrats right I mean they have all these tools using our money to track us um and we don't know anything about them we're sitting here in ignorance of this and it's completely inverted right I mean the government's not supposed to have this kind of information but um Anyway, we have a couple comments here. Donald says, you can only join the dots if they're visible. True. But I'll tell you, it's so complicated. We need to start. And some of it is visible. You never know, right?

Wikipedia did a pretty good job. I mean, not Wikipedia. WikiLeaks did a pretty good job of exposing stuff. I mean, there is the ability to get this information. So many people just... or acting in fear or not acting out of fear. And, you know, at some point it really doesn't take very many people to come forward to start filling out the puzzle pieces. Sarah gold says, go ahead. I was going to read a comment. No one is going to vote for another dumb shit authoritarian conservative after Trump poisoned the well so thoroughly. I think Vance has a lock on this. I wish that were true,

but I don't think that the voters don't even know that this technocracy is being rolled out under their own noses. And it's for a whole variety of different reasons. But look at what's actually going on right now. So if you look at social media, what are people talking about? Almost the entire feed is about Charlie Kirk. What is happening as a result of the discussion of Charlie Kirk? You have people making rampant speculation with no evidence about who's behind it while the government is pushing more surveillance and pushing laws to suppress free speech all under the name of a guy who was promoting free speech.

So that's what's going on today. So no one's even talking about it. the authoritarian conservative stuff. Somehow, because they're using these emotional things, the stuff's being rolled out and people are cheering it on. Again, if the groups of people that I've been speaking to aren't aware of the Genius Act or the Clarity Act and really haven't thought about the fact that real ID is a digital ID, that one gets a pretty big response. People still aren't looking at real ID. as being a digital ID, I think I'm probably going to have to do maybe an episode on that and get some people to come in and talk about this. Because when you look at how digital ID works, and then you add the

component of Palantir connecting to the IRS and then connecting to other federal... That's going to link into... the digital ID. And so no one put up any opposition to real ID this time around. People have been putting up opposition to real ID for twenty years. In the last episode, we talked about politics, which I don't know if you caught that one. It was the quality was poor because I was running off of my hotspot. We were traveling. I'm going to redo it and I'm going to expand it significantly because a couple of people did come up to me that they did hear that live in New Hampshire and they were like, oh, wow, I had no idea. of all of that. But one of the things that New Hampshire,

you know, and the Liberty people, you know, did for a long time is they opposed real ID. And then at some point they caved, but no one talks about it because they only talk about the wins here, which is something that pisses me off about politics. I was actually at the point where we were going to take my super pack and turn it into a five one C four. And I was going to start measuring the, Politicians on a score. You have all these scorecards. Heritage has a scorecard. Everybody has a scorecard. But it's always about a snapshot in time. Nobody ever maps how someone voted over time and then map that against whether their votes were substantial or not,

whether they mattered or not. Because you end up in the situation where people will do throwaway votes, but they'll negotiate a throwaway vote. exchange for voting for something where their vote did matter there's a way to capture all of that I ended up not doing it just because I realized that one of the big problems with politicians is that even if you have people that claim to be principled they all cave and so the reason I gave up on politics was you can figure out the game you could even figure out how to build an infrastructure to get out the vote and all that other stuff but what you can't do is find anybody who will remain principled on issues that actually matter.

That is the weakest link. Now, the other stuff is, by the way, hard to overcome. It's not impossible to overcome. It takes a lot of money and it takes a lot of technology, but that was the weak link. So in New Hampshire, we opposed successfully Real ID, and then we didn't, but nobody talks about it. We put up a fight against Medicaid expansion. And then when we got into power, the same people that signed a pledge to oppose it, some of those same people who got elected opposing that issue, co-sponsored legislation to make it permanent after it failed even worse than anybody could have possibly imagined in terms of expenditures and increase in size and scope and scale.

so anyway um yeah well I think there's a lot of misdirection and I think people get worn down and then at some point the real id just goes through you know what I mean it's been pushed this way that way this way that way and then all of a sudden it's just the pathway's clear for it and there it is and so I look I I don't want to you know i I've got some theories on that. I don't know if it's really worth talking about, but, but the, I think the one thing that really is important is the, um, you know, I don't want to lose my train of thought here. The, um, um, anyway, I'll just leave it. I'll, I'll, I'll, there was something else I had on mine, but I've kind of forgotten it,

but it'll come back here in a minute. Yep. Um, Yeah, I'm trying to... I'll tell you, it was an intense week. The traveling... Oh, I know what I was going to say. Yeah. Yeah, so I think the other thing too, Aaron, with doing this technocracy map, this is what I was going to say, is that I think it invites whistleblowers because... if you can map this out, people can understand where they fit in the whole picture. So all of a sudden they say, oh, you know what? I got caught between here and here and that's something I know something about. You know what I mean? And then they maybe step up and they're willing to talk about it. But if it's too hard for them to connect the whole picture,

They're afraid to step up and be a whistleblower because they just don't understand. You know, they don't understand enough to say, oh, I actually play an important role in this. I saw this and this and this go on. You know, they're willing to vouch for it and they've got facts on it. But if they don't see the picture, it just gets washed away. Right. And I think so. Whistleblowers, that's got to be huge. And the other thing, too, is I think when you lay this out. you know, being in Ohio, I think there's going to be, if you can find the right people, you know, around Vivek Ramaswamy, around this Narya Capital, you know, around this bank, right, this Erebor that's going to be coming, you know,

the one that's going to be the Peter Thiel, Palmer Luckey bank, there's going to be people who know about this stuff, right, that are going to talk, you know, and I think you just have to find them, right, and they're going to be willing to say, yeah, you know, this is just, there are moral people that, you know, but You know, it's tough to walk away from a big job, right? A lot of people have a hard time walking away from, you know, you know, unless they know that it's just morally wrong and they understand the picture and they understand where this is headed to. Like you said, people's jaws drop when they found out about the genius act, the clarity act and how it backdoors the CBDCs.

And once they figure that out and they see it, you know, the question is, do they act on it? You know, that's the next question. People understand it, but do they take any action based upon it? And that's the next hard part. That is the next hard part. And, and, you know, again, do they believe it? You know, it, I mean, I think that people believe what I was saying. I don't think they wanted to hear it, but they, but, but I did have an audience and that's one of the good things about being part of the Brownstone Institute is that people will at least listen to what I, what I have to say on this. And, but, you know, one of the things I was saying earlier, like even when tying, tying things,

somebody came up to me, I think yesterday and said, wow, Vance and Musk, they're not good guys. What about Vivek Ramaswamy? And I started to give a couple of comments. about that and they're like well aren't there aren't there any good people and I'm just kind of like look we've got to cut it with the white knight thing no one's going to save us but you certainly shouldn't count on any of these people saving us and but but one of the things when I was doing research on this I mean it did occur to me like why knowing how venture capital works why in Whatever year it was, seventeen or twenty nineteen.

Why would they why would you put an area capital in Cincinnati? That is not a place to have a venture capital firm. Right. I mean, I mean, I've done the venture. That is not where you would put a high tech. So, I mean, to what extent have they been architecting? Do you think that the plan all along was for VEC to end up governor? Well, you know. I don't know. The way I understand, you know, the election between Obama and Hillary Clinton was, you know, this people might shoot this down, but, you know, you get the Bilderberg group and they chose who they were going to who they which one was going to be, you know, the candidate that year. Right. And I mean, did they have back to back meetings?

You remember? I don't know. What are your thoughts on that? You remember that they created one in and they created the next one in the next day? And I think the decision gets made. Who's the right one? Well, I mean, look at Obama. I mean, he's head and shoulders above Hillary. You know what I mean? In terms of selling an idea, you know, I mean, he can sell ideas over her all day long. Right. So that wasn't a tough decision. And I think the same kind of a thing potentially with Vance and Rav Aswani, right? I mean, look, the guy was very opportunistic. You know, he knew that Trump is a wild card and, you know, he knew what happened in the first election when, you know,

the whole thing comes out on the, oh, what was that thing, you know, where Trump, three weeks before the election and he's like oh you just grab them by the you know right that whole thing livex sitting there probably saying look I just need a position behind this guy because I could just get lucky you know what I mean and just slip right in there you know I could be the I could be the republic candidate I think after that you know ultimately though was it ever going to work for him probably Could you have ever had a Vivek Ramaswamy as president and Dave Hansen as vice president? I mean, could that have been the deal? Peter Thiel's like, well, I'm picking the vice

president for twenty twenty eight. Here you go. Let's just attach him to Vivek. I don't I don't know. I don't know. It's sort of funny to think about. Well, Courtney actually says not Bilderberg, CFR. In my opinion, Carol Quigley said the CFR has chosen for over a century, and that was decades ago. But as to this, why Cincinnati was picked for Naria Capital, I mean, again, I'm looking at Ohio. Credibility. And workforce ranked D+, thirty-first. Education, twenty-fifth. Business-friendliest, twentieth. Quality of life, seventeenth. Economy tenth. So why, you know, again, you would have to have some advanced knowledge or

putting yourself in a position where you're trying to architect a scenario where you can change the regulatory market and change some of these things. Because otherwise, Ohio is not a competitive place to be for these types of businesses. So, again, I want to see – like, putting together the timeline – of Yarvin Vance and Teal was interesting and instructive. And the fact that there are public podcasts and public events where you actually have quotes and can prove and document that these things happened was amazing. I think that as we put together the pieces, I want to understand more about Ohio because Ohio is turning out to be pretty... You're right there, man. You are right in the...

You're right in the thick of it, and I would not have pinned that. I don't know. It wouldn't have occurred to me that Ohio might turn out to be the next Silicon Valley for technocracy. Well, it could have components. But, you know, don't forget that Wexner was here. You know, banking's always been here, right, with, you know, J.P. Morgan has big stuff here. Bank One was here before that merger acquisition. You know, we talked a little bit about Max Fisher, you know what I mean, and his connection to Ohio. So, I mean, this is a deep thread that goes back a ways. And, you know, Erebor Bank, right? E-R-E-B-O-R. That's the one that Peter Thiel and Palmer Luckey and

Joe Lonsdale are bringing to town. What are they up to? You know, they're up to something. You don't just bring a digital bank out of nowhere, you know, located in Columbus, Ohio, you know, for no reason. They're up to something. You know, they're finding something here. And it's really geared toward, you know, you know. what's the right word I'm looking for? Family offices, right? High net worth family offices, right? I mean, it's being geared toward, it's not a normal bank, you know, it's got its components and it's also a funding mechanism that they're using, you know? So there's a lot of research that needs to be done on that and a lot of legwork, you know, and remember that Palmer

Luckey's Anduril is being located in Columbus and it is a Silicon, I mean, it's a Silicon Valley, You know, it's a heavy hitter, right? This is going to be a big factory with a lot of money and a lot of technology. You know, and it's this unmanned spacecraft, which is, you know, look, that's another whole area of space. Have you seen this whole Ashton Forbes thing with this zero point energy? Have you seen it? Do you have any thoughts on that? Because I'll tell you what, you know, I mean, there's a lot of things. I don't want to go too deep on that, but there is something to this. And the dark journalist, have you ever seen him? I mean, the guy is really sharp. I mean, have you ever seen him?

Yep, I have. And I don't know what to make of it. I mean, Ashton follows me on here and on X. And I actually just saw he was on Alex Jones last week as well because essentially Trump came out and vindicated everything that he's been saying. which I find to be interesting. And I've studied a lot of that. I mean, we have the Invention Secrecy Act of, I think, where the government has been suppressing patents, over five thousand of them. And a lot of these are energy related patents. And what they're able to do because of the way that it's structured is they can shoot down a patent on the basis of national security

or economic security. And so what happens is you as the inventor, you submit a patent. And then the government can come in and the heads of the different agencies, the heads of the energy department, whatever the department is, and then come in and say, oh, well, no, this is a threat. And then as the inventor, your patent doesn't get published and you can't even talk about your invention for a certain number of years or you get an automatic ten or twenty year or something prison sentence. And a lot of these patents are in the energy world. area so the idea uh some of these things about zero point energy and a lot of these other concepts seem really plausible and you hear the guy that was

what's his name ben rich or whatever was the ceo of of skunk works and he said yeah we said years ago all of this techno you said we have technology that you couldn't even imagine and we've had it for decades I mean that's not surprising I mean where does all this money go it's like catherine austin fitz talks about the twenty one trillion dollars missing I mean, yeah, sure. Maybe, maybe they just pissed it away, but at the same time, that's a lot of money. And if, if, if the government can just steal all of the good inventions and then basically hand them over to whichever company is that the agency's captured by, then who knows what's going on, but I'm sure it's much worse than we,

that we think. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, I agree. You just don't you don't like just piss away. Twenty one trillion dollars just does that has a directed purpose. I mean, you know, like it ends up in the hands of people who are making big time decisions. I think I don't think that just gets, you know, I'm saying like that's a lot. Right. Well, I'm, you know, right before nine eleven, you know, we had what's his name come out the night before and say what they lost two point three trillion or something like that. Yeah, yeah, yeah, right. Yeah, exactly. And then nobody paid attention to it, right? It's similar to what we're talking about here with Charlie Kirk. It's like we have this

horrific event and it all gets whitewashed. They utilize it again. I mean, my belief on nine eleven, it was a totally planned event. So that's the that one was easy with everything that fell out after that, all the legal Patriot Act and so forth. But the Yeah, I just I think that that twenty one trillion has been used for a lot of these, you know, energy. Energy is a good one. I mean, all kinds of technologies that we just don't get a look at. We don't you know, and the question is, when do they unleash this stuff? You know, what what is the trigger point for them to unleash some of this and just shock people's minds? Because. And how does that get rolled out, Aaron?

Like, you know, seriously, if we have zero point energy, how do they expose that? You know, I mean, the dark journalist talks about this, how they're going to roll that out. You know, I mean, he's an interesting guy. He's done his work. He knows what he's taught. I mean, I think I think Catherine Austin Fitz would say that they're building a parallel parallel structure, underground bases and everything else. And they'll just wipe us out and they'll. keep the technology. That's one, that's kind of one view. I mean, I've heard all kinds of different things. Then you hear like on the, on the other extreme, David Wilcock, are you familiar with him? Yeah. I mean, he actually wrote a couple of good

books a long time ago, but he, he has gone. You know, it's almost like a pattern. Somebody puts out a book that puts out controversial information, but that's true. He wrote this book called, I think, The Source Field Investigations or something. And it had all kinds of true things. I mean, this is where I learned about the guy who invented the, you know, water power car. And he had a whole variety of things that were referenced. And I view the references. But then all of a sudden, at some point in time, where he gets, you know, some popularity around this, but then all of a sudden, he's starting to talk to insiders and then he's like surrounding himself with all of these people that

are completely not credible. And then I remember during COVID, he started making all of these predictions about the white hats and the intergalactic, this and intergalactic, none of it came true. It was all false. Everything he said about politics was wrong. And then every time he said something that was based on an unknown insider. So his credibility is, is just dead. And then that affects the perception of the book and the material that he did a long time ago that was actually well-researched. That seems to be a pattern I've noticed as well. But he actually had a lot of very good information in there. I mean, there's even been claims about some guy from MIT who was

talking about cold fusion and was about to do an interview where he was going to unveil something and mysteriously was murdered at his home in Connecticut under mysterious circumstances. There's a whole bunch of things. So we don't know anything. The one thing I know is we really don't know anything, but it does seem to be the more you know, the worse it gets. right like it's never the it's never some there was some noble cause behind all of this and there was some reason that they couldn't tell us and you know it was it's for our own good that isn't it yeah yeah that you're right that is not it

That is not it. But this is concerning. The Vance thing is really concerning. The more you see how scripted... And by the way, I just touched on the surface of it tonight. I mean, you could do a thing on Vance. You could do a ten-part series on Vance. I just wanted to cobble together some of the high points that might be of interest relative to what's going on. But I mean... It's crazy how sculpted this story is. And then roping the thing in. But yeah, Ohio needs to be understood. Because yes, I know Andrel's there, but looking at this, it's not an ideal place to start a bank.

If you're going to start a bank, you'd start somewhere where There's either really good regulation or in this case, they're in essence trying to fill the gap that Silicon Valley Bank played. And yeah, Andral's one company, right? But it's only one company. Why wouldn't you do this in Texas and try to work with all of Musk's companies? Why wouldn't you do it in Nevada or Wyoming if you were looking for, you know, or even New Hampshire? There's so many other places. where the regulations are better and the tax structure is better. So it does seem to me that it seems like Ohio is going to become one of the big

hubs of technocracy. Well, and especially if you can, I mean, I think Vivek Ramaswamy, unless he screws up, I mean, he's a shoe-in for governor, right? So, unless you can, you know, I don't know if tax abatement's the right word, but there's a lot of things you can do, right, if you're the governor, to sell the idea that, you know, look, you know, Ohio has a chance, right? You can imagine the sales pitch, right, Aaron? You know, Ohio, look, you know, we've fallen behind on the manufacturing, you know, we're bringing some manufacturing back, we need to put in this banking you know and to do that we need to you know this is what we need to do you know and we need to you know this is

for the benefit of ohio you know and the brain drain and right you can see how they can sell this pretty easily right aaron especially and you know columbus is a pretty metropolitan city without a lot of industry Cincinnati is similar with a little bit more industry. Cleveland is a lot of industry and pretty depressed. Toledo is pretty depressed. Dayton is pretty depressed. You know, with a little bit of they all survive. But there's, you know, all of a sudden you bring in a banking system, bring something back here and it's easy to sell the people. You know, again, especially if you're going to get rid of the Democrat, you're going to get the Republican side and you're

going to you're going to go down the middle with some. You know, like you were saying before, you've disenfranchised the Democrats, you've disenfranchised the Republicans. Now you're going to take it down the middle. I think Ohio is willing, if you give them a good sales pitch, Ohio will go. If, again, assuming that votes even matter, right? We're under the assumption that votes even matter. But I think Ramaswamy is a shoo-in. and he look at his technocratic background right I mean this guy's got technocrat written all over him you know what I mean strive capital you know roy van all these whatever you know what seven or eight different companies that were all feeding into the

pharmaceutical side of things you know all the products for you know the mrna right so I mean it's got it written all over it I mean this guy's a perfect technocrat really and I just happen to turn politician so I don't know I mean like you said if you're architecting something who knows what they can come up with, right? Ohio is an easily manipulated state that they can give a pretty good sales pitch to get change, right? To get what they want. And it's in the middle of the country, right? So it's unassuming. You know, it's got a lot of things going for it if you're trying to really manipulate things. So, you know, just trying to throw those ideas out there. Yeah. No, I mean, it's...

Clearly, there are reasons, and I think some of them are a plan and a trajectory to be able to have control that wasn't apparently obvious at the time they announced it, right? Like, in other words, they have to know they're going to be able to push a lot of this stuff through. Because, again, it rates a D-plus on workforce. But then again, I mean, you know, how long before Andrew's facilities are actually manned by robots? You know, here's what they're going to do. They're going to sell people on manufacturing jobs, and then all the jobs are going to be run by the robots. That's absolutely going to happen. You know, when you start studying what's going on in China, they have factories in

China that are already, I guess, manned is the wrong word, but operated by robots, completely by robots. So, yeah, they will probably politically sell people on economic opportunity for Ohio. I guess it will be economic Ohio opportunity. Maybe it'll be UBI. Yeah. Maybe that'll be a place to roll that out. But I don't know. It is challenging because people still don't know about technocracy. I ask people to raise their hand if they've heard of technocracy. Technocracy is not an understood concept. even amongst people that are

I and I didn't realize that uh jarvin coined the red pill phrase oh really I didn't know before the alt-right took it over I mean that's pretty big right I mean that's a pretty big influence that you once you realize that's the source of that um don't know it's crazy uh you know andreessen all of it and and then it gets confused they've done a brilliant job because again I know a lot of libertarians that confuse what they're doing with capitalism and it has nothing to do with capitalism um and then the confusion of technocracy and technology again we're not going to defeat it at the ballot box it's just it is now it's still the race to build to build these alternatives so um I'm you

know again it's trying to balance the time as a there's a struggle on this. Yeah. Well, and being in Ohio, I mean, I'd like to get knee deep into it or, you know, really neck deep, but I think once we've mapped that out, it'll help me to, you know, try to, if you're trying to anticipate what they're going to do, you know, and that's what I was asking you, you know, when you see these laws being rolled out, you know, on the back of Charlie Kirk, you know, really being pulled off the shelf pretty quickly and putting into place, you know, while the iron's hot. And, you know, the same kind of a thing here, if we're trying to anticipate what's going to happen in Ohio,

we're trying to get out front of it, you almost need to get to know people in that space, you know, before it happens because you can't. Once they're bought and paid for, they're in deep, there's no guarantee you're going to get a whistleblower, you know? So the key is to try to figure out what's going on and, and try to position in front of it, you know? So that's why I'm really interested in putting together this technocracy map and really trying to get a, get a feel for where is it going? What's the next step? And then try to be out front of it. Well, so I will say the, I mean, the end state, the end state is, you know, global digital currency based on energy credits with a complete social

credit system with UBI and everything else like that, that I, I, pretty convinced that's the end state. So everything is working towards that. But I will say that using AI, there are a lot of people that are skeptical about AI's ability to to do things. I'm not saying whether AI, whether you think AI is good or not, I will tell you that AI will replace things faster than the skeptics understand. There are people that are skeptical of it that say, well, yeah, I'm skeptical. It'll never be able to do this or never be able to do that. I'm like, well, have you ever used it? Well, no, but I'm not even going to use it. It's an evil.

I will tell you, even from my own perspective, experiences in using it and the rate at which I'm able to increase my own personal productivity and now it depends on how you use it and how you know how to use it I mean it's like a hundred x And then the actual, that multiplier is increasing because it's cumulative as to what's going on. So if that's the case for me, and I'm telling you that one thing, I'm not even sure how to present this information yet. I probably will do an episode of this where I want to show people how I'm using AI so that they can start using it as well. But once you...

consider that the technocrats have had a an advantage they've had a leg up they've had these systems longer than we have then when you're trying to predict what happens next I will say this much. That would play a... If they had a six-month, one-year, two-year head start on this AI, that would change dramatically my perception of what's going to happen next. But when you think about things like... When they talk about the projections, and I'm going to look at this, of robots, because I've looked at Andro, and I know there are a couple of others. I mean, they show the ones that can now... do dishes and everything

else and have fine motor control. And by the way, in China is even much more advanced than we are. Yeah. I see a lot of people being like, well, you know, you should go to trade school and become a plumber because they can't replace a plumber. You're, you're not studying the technology. They can in fact replace a plumber. A robot could replace a plumber. And depending upon how much of a head start they have with this stuff and how quickly that's already rolled out, that would be interesting to find out is to get a snapshot of exactly how much further ahead we are. But I think things are going to be replaced much more quickly. The implementation of robots. I mean,

I'm at the point now even where I'll start a project. I'm like, all right, here's a simulated management team where I take actual people. I'm like, all right, if I were to build a dream team, here's the dream team here's the advisory team and then you can create simulate decisions that they would make I mean and courtney talks about this she talks about you know having a digital twin but I will tell you I've I've done this I've structured this so from the standpoint of I've I've run companies and I've had management teams and advisory boards and then I'm simulating And in some ways, simulating it is better because you actually get the best parts of what their thinking process

would be like without the politics and without any kind of sabotage. But now it's to the point where you can use agents and start automating tasks. And I'm at the point where I could incubate a project and it's almost faster to automate the project than it is to train someone on how to run the project. And I say that because it's a genuine concern that I have about, like, I see there being a, there really is going to be a fracture. There are going to be people that are a hundred thousand X-ing their productivity. And then there are people that don't know how to use AI. There's the gulf in productivity is going to be,

and probably actually already is unprecedented. And the people that aren't using AI are simply, they actually don't have much to contribute economically. And I'm telling you, this has happened over like the last ninety days. And even when I'm doing something like coding, if you stay on top of what's going on with the models and then you figure out a breakthrough to connect this thing to connect this thing, you can get a ten X multiplier over thirty days just by following what's going on. I mean, and now it's to the point where it's like, oh, if you wanted, you could replace, you know, I'm like, all right, I was building the website. I'm like, I'll just build my own dashboard.

I'll build my own CRM system. I'm not even going to use Salesforce. Then you're like, all right, I'm going to simulate what a sales team would look like. And it's like, oh, I could use, you could create an avatar. They've got another thing that you could use that can actually go out. I think it's a company called Pine or something where they have bots that you can use where you basically create, use a voice or whatever, and it will call and negotiate things for it. Like if you need to dispute a medical bill or change reservations for something, you can actually program this AI to do it. And the person on the other end doesn't even know they're talking to an AI. So you take all of the phone

calls back and forth, all of everything else. It's all being done now by an AI. Then you can string all of this stuff together and basically create maps where it's like, okay, I want this email to be sent out. And then here's the logic for this. And then plug into this and plug into this. And people are creating diagrams and automated scripts that take entire workflows and automate it. Every aspect of a workflow. This is here now. Agentic AI is what it is, and it's here now. So the rate here, so there is, if people are like, well, I can't replace what humans do in this regard, these are some general statements that are not factoring in how these things work and they're not

factoring in the ability for the systems to be able to interact with each other and to begin doing some error correction I'm not saying that all of the stuff is perfect or that it's all great but what I am saying is the productivity gains and what they're going to be able to replace in terms of what humans do is not a five to ten year thing I see people saying oh well this is going to go away in five to ten years what's interesting even in the realm of coding, is it's actually the higher end developers that are getting wiped out first. It's flipped what people's expectations were. It's going after some of the higher end positions. I mean, there's one now where you can have it.

There's a prompt. It's like, all right, simulate a three hundred thousand dollar McKinsey market research report. right? And you just, you write out the prompt, you engineer the prompt properly. And it's like, yeah, like what's the use of McKinsey at all? McKinsey could be completely replaced with a prompt. So I don't know. I didn't even know if this is the right place to talk about this, but it does need to be talked about because I know a lot of people have just dismissed it and they're in for a rude awakening. And I also don't know what the implications of it are because, again, it's not necessarily a bad thing, but it depends on who controls it. like every other technology

right if we're now going to use this charlie kirk thing to get rid of the uh two thirty section two thirty repeal and we're gonna do all this other stuff um you start applying this same kind of thinking to ai and it's it's a real problem this stuff could become tyrannical right away or it could be something that does you know propel us forward yeah Well, one of the things I've noticed, and I have a couple pretty high-end programmers that work for me, and I noticed this happening with OneDrive. So Microsoft has their cloud OneDrive. So you can put Microsoft Excel on there. You can put PowerPoint.

You can put... different, you know, different software that they have on this OneDrive. And the nice thing about it is, you know, you could use it. I could use it. We can both use the same thing, you know, from different locations. And it's pretty good, right? You know, you can edit it. I can edit it. I can see where you're at. You can see where I'm at. You know, we could be in different cells right next to each other and Excel and it would be just fine. The key though, Aaron, is it's very hard now. They're getting, they've changed something in it where it's very hard to actually save Excel spreadsheets to your desktop, to your hard drive. They're pushing everything they can to the cloud.

They want everything. And I thought I was just me. I thought, oh, something changed. You know, they did an update. And I'm just, you know, like, I mean, I'm like you. I'm an okay programmer. I can get through stuff. But you have to understand it, right? I'm more of a developer mindset. And then I help the programmers put together the end product. And so that's kind of my thinking. And I understand enough SQL and so forth, different software to get through things. But the point is this. I asked some of my coders, have you noticed this? And they're like, yeah. And they were upset about it. Right. It's even hitting them. I mean, these are the kind of guys that are like bulls. You know,

like I was saying to somebody like a cornfield, it doesn't slow them down. They just blow through this stuff. But it's actually frustrating them. Right. How much of this stuff is being pushed out onto the out onto the cloud? And I think where they're at, Aaron, is, you know, we saw Mark Benioff at the World Economic Forum this year talking about agentic AI, that they had it, they were using it, they were ready to roll it out, and then they backed away from it. Somebody must have made a last minute call or they were teasing basically to extract the last little bit of information, right? Force all of us, force us to put our stuff out on the cloud and be able to absorb it,

gather it all, feed that into their AI. You know what I mean? Extract the last little bit. At some point, right, you know, They're squids, right? They're trying to suck the last little blood out of us before they basically cut us off. We don't know where that cutoff point is, but that's what I think is going on is they're forcing us to get as much stuff out there on the cloud as possible to feed their AI machine, their engines. And then at some point they will just flip the switch because Mark Benioff said it, they already have the agentic AI ready to go. And that's, that's how I sense things going right now. And I, you know, again, it's a small little control group, but when my programmers

tell me that they're having the same problem, like that's that, you know, it's not just me making a mistake, right? That's, that's a pretty collective effort. And these guys have been doing this for twenty five or thirty years. I mean, these guys are pros, you know, so. Oh, yeah. No, Microsoft is a it's a disaster. You're absolutely right. I mean, I only rarely have to use Microsoft and it is trying to save it to locally and is a chore and they've made that really complex and everything is moved to the cloud. Again, for over a long period of time, this has been going on silently for a long time. I think that they're further along. and then people um appreciate and because I

use a lot of ais on a regular basis and the rate of acceleration is dramatically picking up musk claims he's going to have agi this year with grok five And again, I think in many ways, China may already be ahead even in this category. Things claim they're not, but they're ahead in like forty seven out of fifty four categories, including robotics and everything else. And so the rate of what I couldn't even predict what things are going to be like twelve months from now. And by the way, it's been a challenge like with my kids. I mean, I look at the stuff that they're studying in school. I'm like, all of this is useless. And they'll have a thing where they, where the kids don't,

the school doesn't want to use AI and there's a, yes, you want to develop certain cognitive skills, but then there's also the stuff that you're teaching them to do. They will never do like you shouldn't even be, you should be teaching them something completely different because the thing that you're teaching them to do is will be replaced with ai you should be teaching them something that actually is is a unique thing that requires cognitive processing and they're not and so it's um my son is taking a computer programming course And it's like, you know, they're trying to teach HTML. And it's like, he's already coded a site where, you know, it's a subscription-based service where it's kind of,

it's not for hackers, but it's for being able to, you know, put in a URL and do a threat assessment of the security of the site. And he's like, he brought this in. It's like the school's not even equipped to teach him on this stuff. And my point in bringing this up is like, what do you recommend to a kid? I mean, I wouldn't even recommend STEM because those are areas that are completely... I mean, Grok four is already like at the top end of graduate level knowledge in most scientific disciplines. So my kids are fifteen and I'm like, I can't even imagine... I actually can't even imagine recommending college. But beyond that, I also couldn't... Like,

there are some... So there are differing opinions on this. There's some people that we're in a society where our identity is attached to our work, but that's just because that's how it's been. I would argue, depending on how it goes, maybe we are freed up to ask more fundamental questions about the nature of reality and explore things in different ways. So in other words, your identity doesn't have to be attached to work, but that doesn't mean that you aren't doing anything or exploring anything. You can actually be productive and not be, there's a way where it's not, you're just sitting there like Harari said, or whatever, playing video games and

having drugs interjected into yourself. one of the things that's been driven out of us is curiosity one of the things the educational system has done since inception has driven out curiosity and positioned us to become cogs in an economic machine and I think one of the things that we're not equipped for is what happens if we have free time and get our curiosity back because so many of the institutions that we have and I would argue even many of the religious institutions have been designed to suppress our inquisitiveness. Anyway, that's not a... I actually do think about that a lot because I do think that the

productivity gains of AI could create a very abundant situation. Like we might not have to work from a survival perspective. Now, of course, this all... The question then becomes, how is all of this rolled out? How is all of this distributed? And this is the problem. This is why people are talking about UBI. So when you have technocrats making those decisions, then that distribution is going to be not great because they don't value free will and they don't value life. And under that model, once you follow that all out, then we're kind of useless. Right. So they'll just get rid of us. But let's say you didn't take that viewpoint and you

were free will first and you were human centric, but you still had those productivity gains and you still had a situation where people didn't have to work. You still have a whole set of problems and discussions that, that need to be had about how society operates. Anyway, I guess this goes back to why we're doing this first principles thing. Yeah. That's exactly where you're headed with that. You know, circled right back to the first principles and it comes back to good versus evil and assessing, you know, how do you assess, uh, know a good debate how do you keep a good debate you know look I mean it's been proven that debate is like you tap into things that you didn't know right

things just flow through you you know you get into a good debate right and it's just been proven people just absorb things and they connect dots that they never connected before or you know because they're being challenged right we we human beings want to be challenged the problem is they've taken that away from us Like you said, just turn us into economic cogs, you know, cogs in the economic wheel. And, you know, these are all interesting questions that, you know, I just think that they've already proven that, you know, I mean, I was watching today one of the things Charlie Kirk said, how much is education improved since the nineteen sixties? You know, even though we've thrown four

point three trillion dollars at it or whatever it is, you know, and it hasn't. So they've already taken all that stuff for their own benefit. So we already know where they would take us. Again, this is why we're talking about these parallel systems, alternative things. It's why I like what Mike Adams is doing. I think his effort is not even a pin drop in the ocean. because he doesn't have the blackwell chips right he doesn't have these different things but he's doing a very nice job with his ai you know and that he's giving us a model by which to run from if we don't do what he's doing like we you know if good people don't do what mike adams is doing We're done. Right. I mean,

we're going to get eaten alive by these people because they will not share this. I my belief is evil. These people want to live forever. Right. They want to take everything they can get. They want to live forever. They they don't believe in, you know, God. Right. They have no very little. I mean, what's Peter talking about tonight? Right. I mean, that tells you all you need to know. Right. When you have people like that in charge of things, Aaron, and funding things, that's a bad deal. That's headed in the wrong direction. That's a guarantee. It is headed in the wrong direction. But the problem is there's nothing stopped. They do run things and they also have momentum. The accelerationism is

definitely towards technocracy and towards these technocrats. And the problem is that what's happened here is, again, even libertarians and other people think these people are heroes. They confuse this with the free market system. There's absolutely nothing that's going to stop them politically. And the question is, given that they also control most of the social media, as we've discussed, Rumble, X, and everything else, how are we even going to get the word out? I mean, we do, we have a We have a lot of challenges here. It's not that it's insurmountable, but, you know, we have to compare. A lot of times people like to say, well, you know, hey, we're making progress in this area. Like,

I think we're making progress exposing COVID, but are we making, is the progress that we're making at a faster rate than the technocrats are expanding and I would say absolutely not I would I would say that we're doing better than we were in terms of getting the word out but it is it is probably not even one-tenth the rate at which they're accelerating and that's the actual gap that has to be closed we have to compare ourselves against what's actually going on in the competitive landscape, not just benchmarked against ourselves, which is a common complaint I make against crypto, which is that people in crypto compare themselves against other cryptos, not against traditional

finance and not against CBDCs. And that mindset has put us in a position where we're taking what was a significant advantage and an opportunity to actually defeat the centralized system to one where we are now absolutely playing complete defense and completely behind. And yet most people, even within the industry, don't recognize that yet. Yep. All right. Well, do you have any other... Big topic. I'm about four hours into this one.

I want to get some sleep. Actually, I drove all night from the Brownstone event and didn't sleep. And then I had a nine a.m. talk on Sunday. So I need to get caught up on some sleep. I'm starting to feel it now. Well, you know, great job tonight. I mean, you know, very, you know, I guess the one thing is, you know, you don't know where to insert this, but I'm sure you're aware of what happened in Nepal, right, over the last week, right? Yep. So, again, I mean, that's the last stand right there. The question is, can they get so far along that, you know,

again, this is why Larry Ellison wants cameras everywhere. You know what I mean? Because then they can stop that before it ever, right? It's, you know, it's somewhere along the curve of minority report, you know, predicting these things because they can see people gathering effort, gathering, you know, momentum before it even really becomes anything. And, you know, Larry Ellison is now tied with Elon Musk for wealthiest person in the world. You know, I don't, that's a whole, we can spend an hour on that probably, you know, just that thing alone. Oh, yeah. No, you're right. He's another one. I actually put out a post today. Now that Ellison is number one, are people going to start

worshiping him like they do Elon? I mean, again, we've talked about this before. His first client for Oracle was the CIA. Oracle powers the Federal Reserve. Now they want to do Operation Stargate and do mRNA targeted vaccines. And he's a big fan of surveilling everything. I mean it's just it's it's a bad movie aaron it's a really bad movie it no it's a really bad man by the way he's eighty four but he looks like he's you know fifty yeah he's probably been getting some injections of something right you know yeah I mean it's just so it's just it's it's all out of like james bond villain central casting isn't it all of it

I mean, really, these are not the heroes that I think people were hoping for. Oh, I guess they don't even know it yet. But yeah, no, I should cover Ellison. I should cover Ellison too, but yeah, all of these guys, it's all government contracts that, that, and by the way, that was the real kicker for me. Cause I, you know, I came at this from an Ayn Rand capitalism free markets thing. And then you find out that, Oh my God, these people are the opposite of that. These people are all government contracts using the force of the state. This isn't about, you know, innovation and trying to empower people's enslaving people, but making it look like freedom. It's not, not a great look. And,

But it's hard to convince people about any of this. Yeah, no, we'll do one on Ellison, too. Yeah, we'll do a show on Ellison. I'm trying to sequence it. I'm trying to figure out which is the most important to get out. I think Yarvin is important. I don't know if it's going to have as much impact, but it's important because his ideas are the framework for this right path of technocracy. He's the most influential. I'm not saying he's the original, but he's certainly not the original person behind it, but he is the most influential person. person pushing these ideas currently today and people haven't heard of them again when I did my talks so most people or a lot of people

have heard of you've all know harari almost no one has heard of curtis harvard so I want to at least it start getting that out there but then some of these other characters yeah anyway it'll be fun working on this technocracy map together because um I I think we're going to be shocked by what we find I know every time I every time I research something I'm shocked And it's hard to challenge. I've done a lot of this on my own, laying these things out, but it's very hard to do on your own. It's definitely a fun project to do together with someone or a few people and then put it out for public consumption and take as much input as we can, challenge it, test it. Like you said, add probabilities,

let it change over time. I mean, I love the idea and I love all the stuff you're doing and I love the framework and the websites and You know, the discussion tonight and, you know, the Zeno and the Freedom Dollar and Raven, all these great things you talked about tonight that I'd like to, you know, learn more. It's just, you know, there's a learning curve. You have to learn a certain amount before you can even really ask questions. And that's the key. How do we accelerate this curve for people so that they can take what they're good at, their skill set, and start jumping on the Zeno, you know, backbone, right? How can they start taking the things that they're good at and jumping in and

And the faster we can accelerate, the better our chances are, because I'm totally if you know, when I first couple of times I, you know, interviewed you and talked with you, you know, you're like, yeah, you know, at one point I was over and I was like, dang. But, you know, you come along and you're like, you know, and I tell people now I'm like, look, you got to listen to Aaron. I think he's right on this and I'm coming around to it. And I mean, we I think we all had hope that you can save it. But it's been taken over. I mean, the technocracy's hijacked it. And I think that to try to spend our – it's a very dangerous effort to say we think we can go head-to-head with these people.

Like you said, if they have a six-month, one-year, two-year, five-year head start with us on technology, on AI, do we really think it's like spotting someone, you know, you're a decent runner, but you know, you're out running a three mile race and you spot someone a mile. I mean, you really think you're going to catch them. I don't care how fast you are. You're not going to catch them. You know what I mean? And that's kind of where we're at in this thing. And I think that's hopefully a simplified way of, you know, putting in context what you've been saying. And that's how I think about it. It's like, or we can just go run our own race over here. You know what I mean? Where we create the rules

and we just let them, would you guys win? You won nothing, right? Because we don't care. We just don't care, you know? And, um, I know it's not that easy, but, you know, I'm getting it, right? I'm getting it. And, you know, the more I get it, the more I can help spread the word and share it with people. So I thank you for all the work you're doing, Aaron and Courtney, and, you know, and the other guests you have on here. I thank you guys for all the work you're doing to help, you know, bring us around and, you know, get us ready to gear up and take the challenge on. Well, I appreciate that. I appreciate everything that you do. And yeah, I'm at the point right now, everything I'm trying to do

is to create platforms for other people to be able to do things. The best I can do is maybe try to put up a couple of examples that are not perfect, but at least show here's what you can do, but then get to try to empower other people. And I'm trying to do that as quickly as I can, because again, I don't think we have a lot of time. I would say one last comment here. Gideon is an AI preemptive platform. that was rolled out by Aaron Cohen, actor and ex Israeli special forces agent at the end of August. It's a minority report. It's minority report actualized. Have you heard of this Gideon AI? Yeah, I've heard of that. Yep. I need to dig into this because I've heard of it, but I,

I have not researched it, um, in detail. So that sounds horrifying. Um, All right. Well, that's another thing to look into. So thank you, Leah. I will look into Gideon. All right. Well, I don't know if you're around on Thursday. It should be Curtis Yarvin. But if not, I look forward to chatting with you soon. I'm sure I'll chat with you anyway. Well, we have a call this week, too. Remember, I think on Wednesday together. Oh yeah, that's right. That's right. So, all right. Looking forward to that as well. All right. Awesome. Well, thank you for, thank you for hopping on and thank you for everything you do. And I'm going to play a song on the way out. Have, have a good rest of the evening.

All right. Thanks Aaron. Good night. Thanks everyone. They said it's for safety. They said it's for peace. But they put the cage up first, then they hid the keys. We will shout their names today

Follow the law and still put them in chains. Freedom's the target, control the game. Change the face, but the hands the same. Catching the ball, while the girls show a name. Free them!

Free, free them now!