100 000 Citizens Hunt Epstein's 19 000 Hidden Photos

Tom and Mary Johnson, Maple Street's a-ninety-nine He's at the kitchen table, six a.m., the screen's blue-light She's got the smart speaker listening every whisper, every prayer. The daughter's face lit up at midnight by the tablet's empty stare. Signed a thousand agreements, never read a single line. Said you were long nothing, it was always the design. Tom checked his retirement Thought he had

it saved away But he's just holding I.O. use The banks get paid first when it breaks He bought the coin that promised him Or set his family free But every transaction on the chain Was there for all to see Mary got the diagnosis Found her records had been sold They want us to own nothing, not our health, our wealth, our soul. And one night at the kitchen table, hands around the coffee cup, Tom looked at Mary and Mary looked at Tom and both said, that's enough.

We'll own nothing but our freedom. We'll own another freedom. Living where they cannot see. We'll own another me. We'll own nothing but. While they find it free They say we'll own nothing Well, we'll own our destiny We found another way Now they're trading private coins No ledger they can read Money that can't be frozen Transactions they can't see Daughters learning in the kitchen Not a screen that steals her soul. Sun knows how to build things on nothing

they control. Found a thousand other families. While it's late, but names are known. When they said we'd own nothing, we built a world they'll never own. We'll own nothing but our freedom. Nothing but our freedom. Building where they cannot see. Nothing but our freedom. We'll own nothing but tomorrow. destiny we found another way if you already own nothing what you got to lose

if they already took it all what's left for you to choose you can sit and wait for permission or you can finally move We got nothing left to lose We'll own nothing but our freedom Building where they cannot see We'll own nothing but tomorrow We'll be right back. We'll be right back.

In a cage that called design Watching everything you do Every dollar, every dime

Thought they'd make us all comply They killed the cash flow Thought we'd roll over and die But underground is rising Growing stronger every day When they shut the front door Sovereign money, sovereign.

We go low when they go high. Feel beneath their watchful eye. Sovereign money, sovereign mind. Leave their

Every word you speak, every thought you share, they're building up a cage and you don't. Sovereign ground.

Building something they can't take Sovereign ground For freedom's sake They own the debt They own the fee They own the money They own the need But they don't own the fire

We're breaking from the machine now Building something they can't take Suffering ground

We don't bow, we don't break We don't give what they can take We don't bow, we don't break We don't give what they can take Roger stood with fire in his hand We went built a haven on free land. Roman wrote the code they fear the most. Now they're ghosting the machine they boast.

They dress it up as law and order. But it chains across the borders. freedom's got a billion eyes we don't But we are told We don't bow,

we don't break Yeah, oh Leo, fourteen, oh, six, seven Every cage they try to build Will break when voices won't be still Roger,

we will stand for you We will fight it through Your code will run We won't do what we are told We don't bow,

we don't break We don't give what they can take The land don't breathe Like it used to breathe My grandfather held the soil Like scripture in his hands But now the fields are wire-tied A fortune of nearly five

hundred billion Running under satellite light Just two percent decide the table Three hundred thirty million souls While the hum of iron engines Sends our birthright to the cold They're pulling five gigabytes an hour Rising like a prayer tonight Send upward to a corporate sky The farmers locked outside Only a tiny handful touch the land.

The machine grows tall. The people small. Their stories slipping from their hands. Oh, the rude remembers freedom. Even buried in the dark. You can chain the lie with numbers. But you cannot change this part. This ain't farming. It's a wheel of steel and coal. Your grandfather's farm's a check point on a techno credit road. They take the seed.

They take the soil. They take the hours from your A quarter of the world's sea Locked behind a corporate gate You can't save your own just by a game Let algorithms choose your fate And nearly ten billion animals Push through corridors of chrome The land once sank, the servers drone What he used to feed

now grown There's over three trillion to quit Farmers rent but never keep And we're over three hundred trillion in debt Pulling families in need Call it progress, call it glory But I've read the hidden lines The machine is fed by labor And it starves the working mind The land still knows your footsteps Even under grits and wires The machine can dim the daylight

But it cannot drown the fire. This ain't farming. It's a wheel of steel and coal. A tiny few hold the compass for the many down below. Click out your day. One story at a time Your grandfather's land's been patterned Your pasture quantified But no algorithm knows the

truth Of what your hands decide This ain't farming It's a kingdom built on screen They turn the soil to a number Turn the farmers into meat But the land remembers kindness And the people are still alive

Welcome back to the Aaron Day Show. This is season two, episode fifty three. This is the I guess technically the last episode of the year. So which, of course, we will be having an episode on New Year's Day on January the first on Thursday at six p.m., which is where we're going to be launching Osara, the global health care marketplace, medical tourism marketplace. So That's going to be very exciting. I apologize for the last episode in the mix up here. I've been working just nonstop on getting all of these websites done. As I've said on the last several podcasts, I think we have twenty twenty six to

actually exit these systems and build infrastructure that can scale based on what's going on with digital ID. and CBDCs and everything else, most of these things are going to be rolled out starting next year to completion in the case of digital ID by early twenty twenty seven. So we don't have until twenty twenty Twenty twenty thirty is when they're going thirty. to have everything in place. This is literally the timetable that we're So I have been, needless to say, dealing with. not sleeping a lot trying to get these sites together. And I'm going to explain how they all interconnect and why I think it's important. as I said the end of January is really when they're all going to be ready

even this technocracy Atlas this isn't the full launch this isn't even it's still very much in beta but I wanted to accelerate adding new functionality in light of the fact that at least some of these Epstein documents have been put together and you know part of this is just a big sense of frustration about the fact that we're not going to get any justice. The DOJ, the people that people think are going to actually hold people accountable are actually covering up for the people that are accountable. That's never going to change. So anybody who sits around waiting for the FBI or waiting for truth to come from government is sadly mistaken. Not only do we need to investigate Epstein,

and I'll talk about why that's important related to technocracy, but we need to investigate the cover up as well. even with all of that said you know part of me doesn't even want to spend any time on any of this because in the end we have to build these parallel solutions anyway so exposing the darkness isn't going to is it going to to solve anything unless people are actually building the alternative and one of the things i worry about in creating something like technocracy atlas is you know what people think is oh well we're going to expose all this stuff and then we're going to fix government that will turn out to be counterproductive so i'm trying to figure out even how to balance

two aspects of this which is crowdsourcing the truth about how bad things are but you know that's doing that is only useful if the realization that people have is that they have to build alternatives and so i'll discuss that a little bit tonight as well but what is important about this and you know you can you can go to the site now i'm still making some tweaks i would actually recommend holding off until next monday but you can go test it out what i've done is i've really thrown a lot of my AI and dedicated hardware at taking these pictures and taking these documents and analyzing them. And I'll explain the details of that in a bit, but it's really to kind of level this

up so that we truly can do crowdsourced investigations, but at the same time, we're utilizing AI and as much technology as we can to do a lot of the heavy lifting for us. And the point of all of these sites is to be very easy to use, very simple to use. The first versions of these things that we put out even with OSR weren't necessarily that, but I'm actually moving to the point now where you're interacting with a chatbot that's trained on specific information. Like in the case of OSR, you'll be able to just interact with it, tell it what you're looking for, and it will give you all of the information. the cost of medical tourism to the cost at your local hospital if that information exists.

And, eighty-four percent of the time, it doesn't even exist. And so, in any event, a little bit before we get into the Epstein stuff, I'll talk about the overall strategy. I apologize for last week. We were out of town, and the internet connection was just horrible. wasn't horrible all week so you know it's just it turns out six o'clock is apparently a time when at hotels people are are all rushing to go online so i'm going to come up with another solution for that i might even pre-record the shows and play them remotely from my computer here and then do the q a live or something like that so just as a way to uh to stop these issues because

unfortunately there is a lot of travel coming up so i need to completely redo season two episode fifty two on musk and i'm probably not gonna get to it for a month or so so uh usually i recommend why you should watch these previous episodes i don't recommend you watch that one uh and that's why there's a lot of great content in there um well not in that presentation but that i put together but i'll repackage it and put it out later the previous episode is an important one. Season two, episode fifty one. This was entitled America. One point O is over. And what I think is critical about this is that what we've put together at own nothing dot org is a set of tools

to help you understand how much sovereignty you've lost. And it's how much sovereignty you've lost in a whole host of domains. So how much of your attention have you given up? How much of your money have you given Your health, your control to government. up? In a lot of these cases, this started out as a website to show people that we give up a lot of our rights through foot graph agreements. And in fact, the most viral post that I've had is showing people the new X terms of service, uh have watched that post and a lot of people are claiming oh i'm going to quit x now based on these new terms coming into effect on january the fifteenth the reality is they only changed

a couple of the terms the things that they're complaining about they're already subject to they don't even realize a lot of artists that are like oh i have to give up ownership of my intellectual property well i'm going to leave but you already gave up your intellectual property everything you already posted he already owns um But the point of oh nothing was going to be to show people every contract you sign is like that. Everything in big tech is like that. Everything in finance, everything in healthcare. But the more I went through it, I realized that we've probably given up more of our rights to things that we don't even consent to. Things that happen automatically.

Package inserts with big pharma. Hospitals that don't publish pricing where you're subject to the terms. Government surveillance that isn't even constitutional. So I wanted to give a holistic picture. But where this ties in, and it ties into Technocracy Atlas, because one of the things on Technocracy Atlas is this kind of DEF CON system, where my argument is that we're giving up our free will, which you can measure this, You can measure this in the form of right? digital IDs, digital currencies, AI surveillance, and we've measured all of that. But now I'm going to translate what's going on globally to what's going on with these sovereignty quizzes that you can take.

And then the point of taking the sovereignty quiz is to then say, okay, once you realize, once you take the survey and you realize, I don't own the money in my bank account, I don't own my investments, I don't own my four one K, I don't own my ETF, I don't even own my Bitcoin, if I don't have it in my own possession, even if I have my own Bitcoin, it's transparent to be identified and seized. Once you realize that, a couple of things happen. One, you realize you have nothing to lose. So a lot of people are holding onto a dream about what they think that they have that is not real. It's in the lodge. And once you get to that point, then you can start exploring other things.

But own nothing in this kind of sovereignty score thing will provide you with then information and resources and will link to alternatives. So it's not just about saying, yeah, you don't own your money. What's the alternative? The alternative is use privacy coins. Get gold, get silver, have it in your own self-custody. Pursue privacy tokens. You do the health thing and realize you don't have any control over this. Health insurance doesn't protect you from catastrophic situations. And so what can you do about that? Exit the system, cancel your insurance, form a medical trust, protect your assets and use medical tourism as a starting point, which is certainly not everything that you can do,

but it's a great starting point to get up away from a lot of the existing pain points. I'm going to be launching late January, February, the daylight phone with above phone. which is a de-Google phone that's gonna have a whole bunch of apps on it, wallets and everything else, privacy solutions, VPNs, all baked in. So the whole point is, what I've been struggling with is the fact that I've been viewing the situation as being dire and that we need to have a real profound sense of urgency, and there is no sense of urgency. Most people don't even realize that So what I've tried to do is put there's a problem. together tools that are all backed by fact, all verifiable with tons of information to

Like if I say something like hospitals, back it up. only eighty four or eighty four percent hospitals don't provide pricing, I actually will give you a map and I will give you that you can zoom in and actually check. And if your hospital is one of the rare fifteen percent that provides pricing, you'll actually be able to see the pricing. Everything that I do is going to be based on actual information. And I think people will be so shocked And I know I've talked to a lot of people. I talked to a friend of mine the other day. He's like, man, when I first heard you talk about America, one point now, it kind of challenged. I didn't believe it at first or challenged

everything that I that I thought. And then and then he tested it, started doing research and conclusion of, yeah, you're right. And when you come to that conclusion, it's not demoralizing like you might think. It's actually energizing because you then start to realize, hey, yeah, I don't need a whole lot to to any of these systems. So so own nothing is critical. to all of this because it's about raising awareness about your individual circumstances and then empowering you to the solutions. And the solutions are in some of the other sites. So OSR is one solution for health. Freedom Forge is a solution that provides information on how to get onboarded to crypto.

But it's also a place where people can create their own businesses, parallel businesses. I mean, in essence, OSR is a project of Freedom Forge. Freedom Forge is a community of people that want to create parallel systems of which OSR is one. Technocracy Atlas is the way of measuring and tracking the sovereignty that we're losing globally and also at the national level or even the state level. So it's more of an awareness thing. And then, you know, we have TheAaronDayShow.com, which I hope some of you are watching. directly on that site which is kind of a communications platform for all of this and then daylight freedom which is the portal to everything it's what my wife and

i are are doing that's kind of the umbrella for all of this but we're going to be housing a lot of the educational materials there moving forward i i've spent a lot of time in the past three weeks and i've talked about this on these podcasts trying to figure out how to solve this problem I travel all over the country and then we've even started to travel internationally trying to onboard people to crypto. And it's really time consuming. It's really expensive. And you can't reach many people. It's been very useful in terms of learning what the obstacles are, what the challenges are that people have. Most of which are kind of obvious, but they haven't necessarily translated to crypto.

Just basic one-on-one having materials that People can understand. And so what I have been doing, and you'll see this reflected in some of the sites, is trying to figure out a way to create dynamic learning environments that are tailored to each person. I mean, even generationally, figure out here are materials that will be for somebody who's not a digital native. helpful for a boomer, this may even be having PDFs people can And in some cases, print out. Rich D' On their printer and actually go through as they're going through the procedure so it's kind of. Rich D' Creating custom learning environments for all of this, so that we can onboard people at scale so that's been one of the other.

Rich D' hundred projects that I have going on kind of behind the scenes, but they are all integrated and they're all integrated around the concept of. Once you become aware of what technocracy Thomas Wallner, is and then it threatens everyone sovereignty and that you can't hide from it, that it actually has to be defeated, but it has to be defeated, not by fighting it, but by. Thomas Wallner, exiting it and building parallel solutions and then there are tools that help you understand and diagnose this individually and then solutions which we're constantly building on. I'm going to be traveling. I was hoping to cut down on some but I do have some things coming up, of the travel,

I'm going to be at Mineratopia, which is, which I'll announce. I believe, February the eleventh or so for three days, roughly around there. I'm really looking forward to that. I love the Mineratopia event and I think Doug Tooman is phenomenal, always puts on a great event. And I really enjoyed our partnership at Porkfest this last summer. So I encourage you to check that out. It's really not just Monero. Obviously, it's Monero Zeno. It's a privacy focus. Obviously, the main focus is Monero, but it's very much a collaborative And it's in Mexico City, environment. which is a terrific venue. And people are actually using Monero. There's a marketplace and everything else.

I'm also going to be going to Portugal. in march to speak at a parallel society conference and this is i've had sterling luhan on here who i really respect and consider to be a friend and i've met him a lot of these conferences uh overseas he's been really leading the charge on network states but network states in a way because i've had you know courtney i've had other people on here that have had different different views on network states and some of them have turned technocratic but they don't have to there's nothing definitely definitionally about network states that requires that they become technocratic. And in some ways, Balaji has hijacked network states.

So Sterling is really on the cutting edge of researching this and living it, traveling to these various network states and then working on putting together tools, solutions and information to help people make intelligent decisions. Anyway, I'm looking forward to that event. That's going to be phenomenal. I've never been to Portugal, so this is going to be a good time to check that out as well. uh the podcast prior to that was on confidential layer i definitely encourage you to check that out especially if you have bitcoin or ethereum or solano or one of these other popular coins that are transparent because you should be worried about the transparency aspect not just

from a government tracking and surveillance perspective but from what are called wrench attacks you need to protect yourself from physical violence if the government can find out what you own and it's on a public ledger so can other bad guys, there are other bad people, not just the government. And this is a real problem. And so confidential layer is a real solution. The effect of the music video confidential layer sets is free, but essentially, it allows you to tokenize it make Elijah make Bitcoin, Ethereum, all of these other assets, private and spendable with low fees. I do want to bring up again, I highly encourage you if you haven't already, please sign the petition. to free Ian Freeman,

who is in prison right now for eight years for basically victimless non-crimes. He was basically set up by the government, who didn't like the fact that he was an effective freedom advocate, and they went way out of their way to try to entrap him, to try to do a whole variety of different things. And he's in prison for, of all things, conspiracy to commit money laundering. That's the largest thing. They dropped the money laundering. He's in there for conspiracy to commit money laundering. And, you know, a friend of mine said, you know, conspiracy is what they charge you with when they have nothing else and you haven't done anything wrong. And so let's get some momentum on, on that.

And I'll have more to say on that after the first of the year. So again, check out the sites, tune in on Thursday for the OSARA launch. And again, you know, I'm still going to call it somewhat beta. Like everything is still beta even if it's launched prior to the end of January. So I'm going through so many different levels of testing the sites and doing backups and everything else. I mean, mostly, I mean, I'm working on development all the way up until during the podcast in a lot of cases. And a lot of these things I'm just developing live in production because they're an early stage, but at some point, and that some point is the end of these things will actually be at some January,

level where, They will be consistent enough and durable and most of my experimentation will enough, actually happen outside of the live production environment. But the things we're going to be pushing with OSR are really movements around three things. Movements around encouraging people to protect their assets, form a medical trust. This is critical. One person every minute files for medical bankruptcy in the United States. Seventy-five percent of those are insured. There's no reason to lose your house to the hospital, to hospitals or big pharma. You can set up a legal instrument for as little as like fifty to one hundred dollars. This doesn't even have to be a big legal expense either.

So we want to put together a campaign to help people protect their assets from from big pharma and the medical health death complex. We want to put together a movement around encouraging people to cancel insurance. And that may sound outlandish. But it doesn't protect you at all. And I'm actually seeing a lot of viral clips online about people that are like, why am I paying for this? I have a high deductible plan. It doesn't protect me in this instance. I don't even know what the pricing is. They just jacked up premium six hundred dollars a month. Open enrollment happens once a year in November. I want to see a massive exodus of the health care system, of insurance, of all of it.

And I'll talk about this in subsequent podcasts, but nothing that's being proposed by Congress Addresses any root cause of the cost or : Rob Frasca, Ph.D. quality issues in healthcare no one's even trying to solve the problem, all the lip service and propaganda behind aside they're doing nothing. And then we'll talk about the technocracy : Rob Frasca, Ph.D. atlas tonight here and they show we've already talked about that the. So Monday's episode is going to be OSR. And then the next episode or the episode we'll have Mike Adams on and we're going after that, to do a big interview. I don't know if it'll be live, but you know, he's actually given me ninety minutes, which is fantastic.

And we're going to talk about AI because I really do want to I want to show you guys what I'm up to. I did some podcasts a few months ago You know, where I just kind of logged in and show you some of the stuff. It has gone so I mean, it's gotten to the point now where I can't even describe, I wanna show you how empowering this technology is, but it takes time to set it up. And there's like, I mean, I spent so much time on this and I've made so many mistakes, but I've learned from them and all of the mistakes have been very beneficial because then you get to the point after a while, particularly when you have your own data in the system, Uh, where it's trained on your own data,

you can actually make yourself a hundred times more productive. You can choose what data goes into the You're not relying on big tech or open system. AI or, or, you know, X or anything else. You're using the AI and training it on your own data. You're just making your own workflows, your own processes more efficient, but it's really empowering, but it takes encouraging people to take action, to take a first step and to start building because. And I'm sure Mike and I will talk about this. I think there's going to be a bifurcation by the end of next year in society. There are going to be people that are using AI and using it cumulatively and building their knowledge and building

And the people that aren't, their data on it. it's going to be the biggest gulf in It's even a bigger gulf than whatever society. anyone would say about income. Equality is going to be those that are effectively deploying proactively the use of AI and those who aren't. Because the difference in And it's not just productivity, it's just, it enhances your, your life, your decision making capabilities. I mean, for instance, you know, with OSR, the stage one is this thing with medical tourism, but stage two is what I've been working on kind of behind the scenes, which is building a system that takes my own genetic information, the actual genome, and then maps it against all of the

scientific literature in the world. And makes recommendations that are personalized to me based on my genome. And then it's run against and I pick which virtual I simulate. Basically, if I like what Dr. Berg has to say, if I like what Mark Hyman has to whatever some of these other people are, say, or if I have a particular issue like Jack Cruz, I can pick I can select just by it's not as simple as checkbox because I I mean, have to do everything that I can to aggregate the information and put it into a form. But I mean, I can get multiple perspectives. I mean, they say get a second opinion. I can get eight opinions all based on my own genome. And then as far as solutions are concerned,

none of the solutions are inherently about the big pharma complex. I can use Mike Adams AI. I can use even a number of different modalities. And it's all on my own computer. It's an AI that's using my own data that's not shared with anybody. I can't express how powerful that is and how liberating that is. In any event, I encourage you to check out books.brightu.edu. I don't even know how many there are Mike sent me an update. now. I think they're like ten thousand books. I mean, He had to upgrade his database. This thing is just absolutely popular. I like it's it's incredibly popular. He's adding more functionality because I think we've created three or four books we've done it now.

on The Aaron Day Show live during the podcast based on a topic that came out. I've co-authored with a couple of different people. So if you're listening, Craig and Jay. Excuse me, Rich Jay. We've co-authored books together live on this show, and it's all based on a petabyte of data or more that he's collected. Primary sources. It's not hallucinating. It's like fact checked based on direct actual sources. People are calling it the Suno of books It's amazing. and Suno is kind of a music generator. So I'm looking forward to that podcast. So with that said, I'm going to I'm going to flip in and go through the info now on Uh, technocracy Atlas,

you can see what's going on with that system. He pioneered money laundering through. Hold on one second. thinks Jeffrey Epstein was just some perverted financier who got too close to powerful people. Wrong. Dead wrong. I've been saying for years that the big war right now is freedom versus technocracy. And the reason I created technocracyatlas.com was to figure out who they are and crowdsource better information.

Because here's the thing, pointing out the darkness isn't the solution. We still need to build our exits. But my hope is that when faced with the undeniable true about the depths of technocracy people will stop rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. And the Epstein files they're so critical to this, not because of the underage sex and blackmail that's what they want you focused on. The Epstein files matter because of his role at the center of technocracy, cryptocurrency, artificial intelligence, human genetics, and intelligence agencies. Epstein is literally the front for the money and the connector of the dots. Understanding Epstein's network is critical to understanding technocracy itself.

Epstein was Meyer Lansky, two point. Oh, the money guy, the facilitator, the central nervous system of a coordinated operation to control the three technologies that will define the next century. Bitcoin, artificial intelligence and human genetics. Now, Meyer Lansky wasn't just a gangster. He was the financial architect of organized crime. He created the offshore banking system. He pioneered money laundering. through casinos and real estate. He understood that real power comes from being the guy who handles the money for people who can't handle it themselves. And that's exactly what Epstein was doing, except instead of bootleggers and gambling operations, he was the money guy for technocrats.

Look at the connections, MIT's Media Lab. Epstein donated at least seven point five million dollars there between two thousand and two and twenty seventeen. But it wasn't just money. He was steering research, sitting on advisory boards. The Media Lab was ground zero for research, human computer interaction and digital currency projects. Harvard's program for evolutionary dynamics. Epstein pledged thirty million dollars in two thousand three. This wasn't charity. This was an investment in genetic research, population modeling and what they euphemistically call evolutionary biology. Then there's the Bitcoin connection. And this is where it gets really dark. Thanks to the recent house leak,

we now know that Epstein was funding Bitcoin core developers. The same Bitcoin developer went on to be a co-author of Project Hamilton, the US retail CBDC pilot that can do one point eight million transactions per second. The digital gold narrative was fashioned by the same people working on central bank digital currencies, all funded by Epstein. I mean, think about it. Epstein's operation exploded right as Bitcoin was taking off. Two thousand nine to two thousand nineteen, the exact same decade when cryptocurrency went from a white paper to a trillion dollar market. when AI went from research labs to consumer products, when genetic engineering went from science

fiction to CRISPR gene editing. And Epstein was connected to all of it. Reid Hoffman, founder of LinkedIn and partner at Greylock Ventures, Bill Gates, whose foundation was funding genetic research and AI development. Sergey Brin and Larry Page from Google. These weren't social connections, these were business relationships. But here's what makes this Meyer Lansky II.O. Lansky's genius wasn't the crimes, it was the coordination. He created systems that allowed different criminal organizations to work together without knowing they were working together. He was the hub that connected everything. Epstein was doing the same thing with technology development.

MIT didn't know what Harvard was doing. Harvard didn't know what the cryptocurrency people were doing. The AI researchers didn't coordinate with the genetics labs. But Epstein was connected to all of them, funding all of them, steering all of them. So when people ask why Epstein had so much money for someone with no visible they're asking the wrong question. business, The question is, who was paying him to coordinate the development of the most powerful technologies in human history? And why did those technologies all advance simultaneously during the exact years of his operation now the official story is that epstein killed himself in jail and his network

died with him but lansky's network didn't die when he died it evolved it adapted it found new facilitators the same thing happened with epstein's operation the connections didn't disappear the funding didn't stop the coordination didn't end it just got better at staying hidden Steven Moawad- Over the next minutes i'm going to show you exactly how this network operates today who's running it now, and why understanding, this is the key to understanding everything that's happening in technology finance and global power structures, because epstein wasn't the exception, he was the blueprint. So let me tell you about Meyer Lansky, the man they called the mob's accountant.

This guy wasn't your typical gangster with a Tommy gun. No, Lansky was something far more dangerous. He was a financial genius who turned organized crime into organized business. Born in nineteen oh two, Lansky understood something his contemporaries missed. Violence gets headlines, but money gets power. And this guy was obsessed with both. By the nineteen thirties, he'd built the most sophisticated money laundering operation America had ever seen. Now, here's where it gets interesting. Lansky didn't just hide mob money. He legitimized it. He took millions in illegal gambling profits and pushed them through a network of legitimate businesses, offshore accounts and most famously,

Cuban casinos. But the real genius wasn't the laundering. It was the connections. Lansky understood that crime without political protection is just crime waiting to get caught. So he methodically corrupted politicians, judges, and law enforcement officials across multiple states. this guy had mayors on payroll in Miami, I mean, judges in New York, and cops in Las Vegas. He turned corruption into a science. When Batista ran Cuba, Lansky essentially controlled Havana's casino industry, generating millions while building relationships with American politicians who vacationed there. The mob's money man had created something unprecedented, a criminal empire that looked exactly like

legitimate business. So let's talk about Jeffrey Epstein's early training ground in financial crime. Before he became the world's most notorious predator, Epstein cut his teeth in a massive Ponzi scheme at Towers Financial. Stephen Hoffenberg ran Towers Financial in the early nineteen nineties, and he brought Epstein in as his right hand man. together they orchestrated a four hundred and fifty million dollar ponzi scheme that defrauded thousands of investors i mean this wasn't using small time stuff we're talking about one of the largest financial frauds of that decade now here's what's fascinating hoffenberg later said something that should chill everyone to

the bone he said epstein has no moral compass this is coming from a guy who ran a four hundred fifty million dollar fraud operation When your partner in a massive Ponzi scheme says you have no moral compass, that tells you everything you need to know about Jeffrey Epstein's character. And this wasn't just about money. towers financial became epstein's graduate school in manipulation deception and exploiting people's trust the skills he learned defrauding investors in the. Those same techniques would later help him build his network of powerful connections and maintain his web of blackmail and abuse the patterns were there from the beginning financial crime was just his

warm up act for something far more sinister. So let's talk about BCCI, the Bank of Credit and Commerce International. This wasn't just any bank that collapsed in nineteen ninety one. This was a CIA linked financial institution that operated as a full service criminal enterprise for decades. BCCI trafficked underage girls specifically for blackmail operations. They would compromise politicians, business leaders and other powerful figures by putting them in compromising situations with minors. then they'd have leverage over these people for years, sometimes decades. Now here's where it gets interesting for our Bitcoin discussion. the investment bank that collapsed in two Bear Stearns,

thousand and eight, had deep connections to BCCI's money laundering operations throughout the nineteen eighties. Bear Stearns helped BCCI move dirty money through legitimate financial channels. And when Bear Stearns collapsed in March two thousand and eight, that was just months before Satoshi Nakamoto published the Bitcoin white paper in October, two thousand eight. The timing isn't coincidental. The same financial networks that propped up BCCI criminal operations that enabled the trafficking and blackmail schemes. These networks needed a new way to move money without traditional banking oversight. Bitcoin provided that solution. I mean, we're talking about the same people who used

a major international bank to traffic children for blackmail purposes. You think they just disappeared when BCCI got shut down? They adapted, they evolved, and Bitcoin became their new infrastructure. The technology might be revolutionary, but the people using it? Same criminals, new tools. So here's something that'll make your skin crawl. Deutsche Bank, the same institution that was Jeffrey Epstein's primary banking partner for decades, is now positioning itself as a major player in the Bitcoin and cryptocurrency space. And I mean, this is the bank that processed millions in suspicious transactions for Epstein, paid massive fines to regulators, and somehow kept his accounts open even

after his two thousand and eight conviction. Now they're running platforms for trading digital currencies like they're some kind of financial innovation leader. But here's what's really interesting. Deutsche Bank has been quietly funding early research into digital currencies and blockchain technology for years. They've been positioning themselves as this forward-thinking institution while simultaneously being one of the most corrupt major banks on the planet. So when you see Deutsche Bank promoting Bitcoin trading services or cryptocurrency investment products, remember who you're dealing with. This is the same institution that enabled a convicted sex offender's financial

operations for over a decade. And now they want to be your gateway into the world of decentralized finance. the irony is thick enough to cut with I mean, a knife. The bank that epitomizes everything wrong with traditional finance is trying to profit off a technology that was literally designed to eliminate the need for institutions like Deutsche Bank. That should tell you everything you need to know about how they view Bitcoin. It's just another profit center. So here's the pattern we need to understand about Bitcoin and digital currencies. And I've been researching this for years. They didn't emerge from some grassroots libertarian movement like we've been told.

They emerged from the same financial crime networks that have been running money laundering operations for decades. And Jeffrey Epstein sits right at the center of this. We know Bitcoin has been hijacked. But thanks to the recent house leak, we now know specifically that Epstein was funding Bitcoin Core developers. the same Bitcoin developer that went on to be a co-author of Project Hamilton, the US retail CBDC pilot that can do one point eight million transactions per second. Let that sink in. The digital gold narrative that was fashioned by the same people working on central bank digital currencies, all funded by Epstein. We also know from court documents that

Epstein was connected to MIT's digital currency initiative through his donations starting in twenty thirteen. The same MIT lab that employed key Bitcoin developers and researchers. This isn't coincidence. This is coordination. Now follow the money. Epstein's network included Leon Black from Apollo Global Management, who managed over four hundred billion in assets. These are the same people funding blockchain infrastructure companies like Chain Analysis and Elliptic. They're literally building the surveillance tools for digital currencies while simultaneously promoting them as freedom money. I mean, think about it logically. Why would traditional banking interests

oppose Bitcoin if it actually threatened their control? They wouldn't. They'd co-opt it and use it to build an even more sophisticated financial control system. The pattern is clear. Financial crimes generate the capital. Figures like Epstein launder it through academic institutions and tech investments. That funding builds the technocratic infrastructure, including both Bitcoin and CBDCs. And it all gets marketed to us as liberation technology. Bitcoin isn't destroying the system, it's upgrading it. And we're being sold the chains that will bind us. So let's talk about MIT's Media Lab and how Jeffrey Epstein's money corrupted one of America's most prestigious research institutions.

Joey Ito was the director of MIT's Media Lab from two thousand eleven to twenty nineteen. And this guy was supposed to be leading cutting edge research into artificial intelligence, digital media and emerging technologies. But here's what we found out. Epstein wasn't just writing checks to MIT. He was specifically bankrolling A.I. research projects through the Media Lab. Now we're talking about serious money here. Epstein funneled over one point seven million dollars directly to the media lab between twenty thirteen and two thousand But it gets worse. seventeen. Ito was actively helping Epstein launder his reputation by connecting him with other wealthy donors and tech leaders.

I mean, think about this. The guy running AI research at one of the world's top universities is taking dirty money from a convicted sex offender. And Ito knew exactly who Epstein was. The conviction happened in two thousand and eight. There's no excuse. When the scandal broke in twenty nineteen, Ito tried to claim he didn't know the full extent of Epstein's crimes, but emails showed he was calling Epstein Voldemort because he knew they had to keep the relationship secret. The public pressure forced Ito's resignation in September twenty nineteen, but the damage was done. MIT's credibility took a massive hit, and we still don't know how Epstein's influence shaped their research agenda.

So let's talk about the Edge Foundation because this is where things get really interesting. The Edge Foundation is this elite Silicon Valley salon that brings together the biggest names in tech and science. We're talking about a who's who of artificial intelligence researchers, tech billionaires, and academic superstars. And guess who was a regular attendee at these gatherings? Jeffrey Epstein, that's right. The convicted sex trafficker was rubbing shoulders with the people who are literally building our AI future. Now, I want you to understand what the Edge Foundation actually is. It's not just some random networking group. This organization has hosted dinners and

conferences featuring people like Marvin Minsky from MIT's AI Lab, Danny Hillis, who founded Thinking Machines Corporation, and other pioneers in artificial intelligence research. Epstein didn't just attend these events as a passive observer. He was connected to key figures in AI development, people who are still influential today in machine learning and neural network research. I mean, think about the implications here. The same man who was running an international sex trafficking operation was also embedded in the networks that are shaping artificial intelligence policy and development. But here's what really concerns me. How many of these connections are still active?

How many people in AI research today had relationships with Epstein that they've never disclosed? So let's talk about Bill Gates and his connection to Jeffrey Epstein, because this goes way deeper than most people realize. the mainstream media wants you to believe Now, that Gates only met Epstein a few times after two thousand eleven, but that's complete nonsense. The truth is Gates and Epstein had multiple meetings going back years before twenty and eleven. We're talking about a relationship that was established and ongoing long before Gates claims it started. And here's what really gets me. It wasn't just Gates meeting with Epstein. We had top Microsoft executives in these

meetings to Nathan Mervold, Microsoft's former chief technology officer. Boris Karp and others from the Gates Foundation. Steven Sanofsky, who ran Windows development. These weren't casual encounters. when you have C-suite executives from one I mean, of the world's largest tech companies regularly meeting with a known associate of criminals and traffickers, that's a problem. But here's the kicker. One Microsoft executive told the New York Times that what happened in those early meetings was, quote, more scandalous than what transpired later. Think about that. More scandalous than what we already know about Epstein's operation. So what exactly were they discussing in those meetings?

What business were they conducting? And why has Gates been so dishonest about the timeline and extent of this relationship? The American people deserve answers. So we need to talk about Elon Musk and his connections to the Epstein network. And yes, there's photographic evidence. There's a widely circulated photo of Musk standing right next to Ghislaine Maxwell at a Vanity Fair Oscar party in two thousand fourteen. Now, Musk claims he didn't know who she was, that someone just asked him to pose for a photo. But here's what makes that story questionable. Jeffrey Epstein told people he was advising Tesla on financial matters. Multiple sources confirmed Epstein made

these claims between twenty eighteen and two thousand nineteen, right around the time Musk was facing SEC investigations and Tesla was struggling with production issues. And this isn't just about one random photo. We're talking about documented Silicon Valley networks where these people moved in the same circles. Reid Hoffman from LinkedIn, Bill Gates, Peter Thiel connections, the same venture capital firms, the same exclusive events, the same Manhattan social scene. when you're building AI systems that could I mean, reshape human civilization, these relationships matter. When the guy developing neural interfaces and autonomous vehicles has documented connections to

intelligence link trafficking operation, that's not conspiracy theory, that's due diligence. The photo exists, Epstein's claims about Tesla are documented, and Musk has never fully explained how deep those connections actually went. So as we hand over more control to artificial intelligence, we need to know exactly who's building these systems and what leverage exists over them. So here's the pattern we need to talk about. MIT, Microsoft, Tesla, Google, all the major tech players shaping artificial intelligence. And guess who was funding AI research at MIT? I'm not saying this is some grand Now, Jeffrey Epstein. conspiracy, but when you follow the money, you see the same networks,

the same people. The same institutions controlling the development of the technology that's going to reshape human civilization. Epstein donated millions to MIT's Media Lab between two thousand and two and two thousand seventeen. The same MIT that's partnering with Microsoft on AI development, the same Microsoft that's pouring billions into open AI. and google they've got deep mind they've got bard they're racing to control the ai landscape i mean tesla's elon musk was so concerned about ai safety that he co-founded openai in then left the board in when he saw where it was heading now he's warning us about the dangers while building his own ai company, XAI. But here's what really matters.

These aren't just tech companies. They're architects of a technocratic future where algorithms make decisions about your life, your work, your freedom. And the same financial networks that funded Epstein's operations are funding the AI revolution. So when we talk about artificial intelligence, we're not just talking about technology. We're talking about power and who gets to wield it. So let's talk about Julian Huxley, because this guy's fingerprints are all over the modern transhumanist movement. And I mean literally all over it. Huxley actually coined the term transhumanism back in nineteen fifty seven. But here's what's really disturbing about this man.

He wasn't just some academic theorist sitting in an ivory tower. He was the president. of the British Eugenic Society from nineteen fifty nine to nineteen sixty two and get this before that he was the first director general of UNESCO from nineteen forty six to nineteen forty eight so this eugenicist was literally shaping international education and cultural policy right after world war two right after we supposedly learned the horrors of eugenics from Nazi Germany. But Huxley didn't learn that lesson at all. In fact, in his UNESCO founding document, he wrote that the organization needed to make eugenics thinkable again. his exact words. He said that even though eugenics had been

discredited by the Nazis, quote, the problems remain and UNESCO should work to make these ideas acceptable to the public once more. Now think about that for a second. The man who invented the word transhumanism spent his career trying to rehabilitate eugenics through international organizations. and today transhumanist ideas about genetic enhancement and human improvement are everywhere in silicon valley and global policy circles this isn't coincidence this is continuation so here's where jeffrey epstein's story gets really disturbing and i'm and i'm talking beyond the trafficking beyond the island this guy was obsessed with genetics and reproduction i mean literally obsessed with

impregnating as many women as possible epstein told scientists and associates that he wanted to seed the human gene pool with his dna he planned to impregnate twenty women at a time at his new mexico ranch twenty women at once this wasn't some sick fantasy he was dead serious about this plan now he dressed this up as science right claimed he was interested in transhumanism and improving the human race But this is just eugenics with a modern twist, the same twisted ideology that led to some of history's darkest chapters now wrapped in Silicon Valley buzzwords and pseudoscientific language. And the guy actually convinced legitimate scientists to take him seriously.

He funded research at Harvard, MIT, and other institutions, donated millions to genetic research programs. all while pushing this deranged vision of strengthening the gene pool with his seed. This is what happens when unchecked wealth meets megalomaniacal delusions. Epstein genuinely believed his genetics were superior and that humanity would benefit from his reproduction. It's eugenics, plain and simple, just rebranded for the twenty-first century by a predator with too much money and zero moral boundaries. So let's talk about Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island. This isn't just any genetics research facility. This is where the modern eugenics movement was born in America,

and now it's ground zero for something much more dangerous. Cold Spring Harbor has been pushing genetic determinism for over a century. They hosted the Eugenics Record Office from nineteen ten to nineteen thirty nine, the same institution that inspired Nazi racial policies. And guess what? They never really stopped. Now here's where it gets interesting. Jeffrey Epstein wasn't just trafficking young women. He was building a network of scientists, tech billionaires, and academics focused on genetic engineering and artificial intelligence. Cold Spring Harbor was right in the middle of it. Epstein funded genetic research there. He hosted dinners with laboratory directors.

He was obsessed with seeding the human race with his DNA through artificial reproduction. this guy literally wanted to create a I mean, master race using modern technology. And the big tech connection, these same laboratories are now partnering with Google, Microsoft, and Amazon on AI-driven genetic research. They're combining artificial intelligence with genetic manipulation to create what they call enhanced humans. So we've got the old eugenics establishment, Epstein's network of compromised scientists, and big tech's unlimited computing power all converging at places like Cold Spring Harbor. This isn't science fiction anymore. This is happening right now.

So let's talk about the pattern here because what we're seeing isn't new. Transhumanism is just rebranded eugenics and the same people funding it today were funding the exact same ideas a hundred years ago. And Jeffrey Epstein, he wasn't just trafficking children. He was pumping millions into genetic engineering research. The guy had a ranch in New Mexico where he planned to seed the human race with his DNA. I mean, this is documented. MIT took his money. Harvard took his money. All to fund research into redesigning humanity. they don't call it eugenics anymore Now, because that word makes people uncomfortable. So they rebrand it as transhumanism, genetic enhancement, human optimization.

But it's the same agenda. The idea that some people get to decide who lives, who dies, and what the future human being looks like. And here's what's really disturbing. The World Economic Forum pushes this stuff Klaus Schwab talks about the fourth openly now. industrial revolution where humans merge with machines. Bill Gates funds genetic research through his foundation. These aren't conspiracy theories. These are their stated goals. The pattern is clear. Elite families and institutions have been pushing population control and genetic manipulation for over a century. The names change, the funding mechanisms change, but the core agenda remains the same. They want to redesign humanity in their

image and they think they have the right to do it. So let's talk about one of the most damning quotes to come out of the entire Jeffrey Epstein scandal. And this comes directly from Alexander Acosta, who was the US attorney for the Southern District of Florida back in two thousand eight. Now, Acosta was the guy who cut that sweetheart deal with Epstein, you know, the one. Epstein pleads guilty to a single state charge of soliciting prostitution from a minor, gets thirteen months in county jail with work release privileges. And here's the kicker. The deal includes blanket immunity for any co-conspirators. But here's what Acosta said years later when people started asking questions about

why he gave Epstein such an incredibly lenient deal. Acosta's exact words were, I was told Epstein belongs to intelligence. Leave it alone. I mean, think about that for a second. The top federal prosecutor in South Florida gets a direct order to back off because Epstein belongs to intelligence, not works with intelligence or helps intelligence. He belongs to intelligence. And Acosta just followed orders, left it alone. Let a guy who was running an international sex trafficking operation walk away with a slap on the wrist. So the question becomes, which intelligence agency, CIA, Mossad? And what exactly was Epstein doing for them that was so valuable they were willing to protect a pedophile?

So let's talk about Robert Maxwell, because understanding Ghislaine's father is crucial to understanding this entire operation. Robert Maxwell wasn't just a media mogul. He was an Israeli intelligence agent. And this isn't speculation or conspiracy This is documented fact. theory. Maxwell was born Jan Ludvig Hoch in Czechoslovakia in nineteen twenty three. He changed his name multiple times before settling on Robert Maxwell. By the nineteen eighties, he was running a massive media empire, owning the Daily Mirror in Britain and the New York Daily News. But here's what matters. Maxwell had deep documented connections to Mossad. He wasn't just helping Israeli intelligence occasionally.

He was actively working for them while running major Western media outlets. Now, when Maxwell died under mysterious circumstances in nineteen ninety one, falling off his yacht near the Canary Islands, he left behind a business empire built on intelligence connections. And guess who inherited those connections? His daughter Ghislaine. I mean, this is a family business we're talking about. the Maxwell family didn't just stumble into intelligence work. Robert Maxwell spent decades building relationships with Mossad, with other intelligence agencies, creating a network of influence and information. And when Ghislaine moved to New York and started working with Jeffrey Epstein,

She brought those family connections with her. This wasn't amateur hour. This was professional intelligence work built on a foundation her father had established over decades. So let's talk about the mega group because this is where the Epstein story gets really dark. This was a secretive organization of some of the wealthiest Jewish American businessmen. And at the center of it was Leslie Wexner, the billionaire founder of Victoria's Secret and The Limited. Now, Wexner wasn't just Epstein's client. He was Epstein's chief patron and enabler. In nineteen ninety one, Wexner gave Epstein power of attorney over his entire fortune. Think about that. A billionaire hands total control of his

money to a guy with no college degree and a sketchy Wall Street background. And here's what's really disturbing. The mega group had documented ties to Israeli intelligence. We're talking about Edgar Bronfman, Sr., Charles Bronfman, Michael Steinhardt, and other mega donors who were deeply connected to Israeli causes and intelligence operations. I mean, what we're looking at here is a sexual blackmail infrastructure, Epstein's private island, his Manhattan mansion, his New Mexico ranch, all of it wired with cameras, all of it designed to compromise powerful people, politicians, scientists, celebrities, world leaders. But this wasn't just some rogue billionaire's sick hobby.

This was an intelligence operation funded by the mega group designed to acquire leverage over the most powerful people in America. And when you understand that, everything about the Epstein case starts to make sense. So let's talk about the intelligence pattern here, because what we're looking at with Epstein isn't some lone wolf operation. This is CIA and Mossad working together on the oldest play in the book, Sexual Blackmail. I mean, it's intelligence tradecraft, one oh one. You compromise powerful people, you own them. And Epstein's operation was specifically targeting tech elites, Wall Street titans, politicians, the people who actually run things. Now,

here's what really tells you everything. Alexander Acosta, when he was US attorney in Florida back in two thousand and eight, he cuts this sweetheart deal with Epstein. Thirteen months in county jail with work release for running an international trafficking ring. That's not prosecution. That's protection. And years later, when Acosta is nominated for labor secretary, Reporters ask him about that deal. His answer, he was told, Epstein belonged to intelligence. Told to back off. Those are his words. So you have to ask yourself, what kind of intelligence operation needs to compromise tech billionaires and media moguls? What are they being leveraged to do? Because when you control the people who

control information flow, Data collection, financial markets, you're not just running sources, you're steering civilization. The Epstein network wasn't about one sick billionaire's personal appetites. It was about control, systematic strategic control over the levers of American power. And that operation didn't die with Jeffrey Epstein. So here's what they don't want you to understand. There are three pillars of control being built right now, and they're not separate systems. They're integrated. They're designed to work together. First pillar is Bitcoin and digital currencies. Now, I'm not anti-Bitcoin, but understand what's happening. The Federal Reserve is already testing

their central bank digital currency. They want every transaction tracked, every purchase monitored. Jerome Powell admitted this in March, they're building the infrastructure for complete financial control. Second pillar is artificial intelligence, and I mean the algorithmic control of information. Google's search results, Facebook's timeline, TikTok's recommendations. These aren't neutral systems. They're behavior modification tools. Tristan Harris documented this extensively. The algorithms decide what you see, what you think about, what you buy. Third pillar is genetics and biological control. mRNA technology didn't start with COVID. Moderna was founded in two thousand ten

specifically to develop this platform. Now they're talking about annual shots, personalized medicine, genetic modifications. They want control at the cellular level. But here's the key point. These three pillars connect. Your digital currency transactions will be tied to your social credit score, which will be linked to your biological compliance status. China's already running this playbook with their social credit system launched in two thousand fourteen. This isn't conspiracy theory. This is documented policy and it's happening now. So here's why this matters and why we built what we built. December twenty twenty five. The Department of Justice finally releases

nineteen of three six last six photos from January sixth. After four years of prosecuting American citizens, after sending grandmothers to prison, after destroying lives and families, they dumped this massive trove of evidence. But here's the thing. They buried it in an unusable format. No search function. No way to find specific people or events. Just thousands of random photos scattered across their website, like digital confetti. I mean, this is the same DOJ that spent years telling us they had all this evidence. The same prosecutors who built cases against hundreds of Americans. And when they finally release the photos, they make them practically impossible to use.

So we built the tool they won't. We took those nineteen three and six photos and made them searchable, sortable, usable, because if this evidence exists, if these photos tell the story of what really happened that day, then the American people deserve to see it in a format that actually works. Now you can search by time, by location, by what's actually happening in the photos. You can piece together the timeline they don't want you to see. You can find the context they've been hiding. That's why this matters. That's why we did the work the DOJ refused to do. This is the Epstein Hub.

This is the Epstein Hub. When you land here, you see exactly what we built. Nineteen thousand four seventy nine photos from the DOJ and House Oversight Committee. Every single one captioned by AI. Not manual captions, not file names. Forensic quality descriptions generated by our vision model running on a Blackwell GPU. The DOJ released these photos in December, twenty twenty-five. Nineteen and three hundred second six photos in JP two format, a format designed to make them hard to search, hard to analyze, hard to use. They released them to bury them. We did the opposite. We ran every single photo through DeepSeq VL two, our vision model.

It looked at each image and wrote a detailed description, averaged six hundred and twenty five characters per photo. This photograph depicts an indoor scene where two men are engaged in conversation near a window with natural lighting. That level of detail, that's searchable. Then we added clip embeddings. That's how visual search works. You type people on yachts and it returns actual yachts, not just photos with yacht in the file name. You search man playing pool and it finds that exact scene. Or you ask the AI chat bot, what's Epstein's connection to MIT? And it cites Whitney Webb's research with page numbers, chapter, and verse. This isn't a document dump. It's an investigation platform.

And it's live right now at technocracyatlas.comeepstein.hub. Here's the photo grid. Nineteen four seven nine photos in a searchable, filterable interface. But this isn't just an image gallery. Each photo has three layers of metadata working together to make investigation possible. First layer, clip embeddings. That's how visual search works. The AI doesn't just look at file names or tags. It understands the content of the image itself. When you search for luxury yacht, it's finding photos that visually contain yachts, not just photos where someone wrote yacht in metadata. It's semantic search for images. Second layer, AI generated captions. We ran every photo through our vision

model, DeepSeq VL-II running on a Blackwell GPU. It looked at each image and wrote a forensic description, not photo-twelve-three-four-ight-jpg actual descriptions. This photograph depicts an indoor scene where two individuals are seated at a mahogany table with documents visible. Average six-twenty-five characters per photo, that's the level of detail we're working with, and all of that text is searchable. Third layer, source labels and provenance. DOJ release versus House Oversight Committee. Little St. James Collection versus Manhattan Townhouse. You need to know where each photo came That context matters. from. And you can combine all three layers. Search for business meeting,

filter to DOJ photos only, sort by collection. That's how you find patterns. That's how crowdsourced investigation works at scale. When you click a photo, you get the detail view. This is where individual investigation happens. Here's what you see. First, the full resolution image, not a thumbnail, the actual photo at full quality. You can zoom, you can examine details, you can look at what's in the background. That matters when you're trying to identify locations or read documents visible in frame. Second, the AI generated caption. This is what enables person search. This photograph depicts two men in business attire seated at a restaurant table. The individual on the left is wearing a

navy suit with a red tie. The table has wine glasses and a white tablecloth. Natural lighting from windows on the right side. That's the level of description, that searchable text extracted from pixels. You search navy suit red tie and you find this photo. Third, source information and provenance. Which batch? DOJ or House Oversight? Which collection? Little St. James? Manhattan Townhouse? Palm Beach Estate? You need that context. Without provenance, photos are just images. With provenance, they're evidence. And here's where it gets interesting, the flagging system. Every user can flag photos for specific reasons. Notable person identified,

suspicious activity, location confirmed, timestamp visible, documents readable. Those flags aggregate. When fifty people independently flag the same photo for notable person, that's signal. That's your investigation priority queue. below all of that discussion threads, real time conversation about what people are seeing, one person spots a building, another geo locates it, a third establishes the date, that's collective intelligence. The flagging system is how crowdsourced investigation scales. This is Elliot Higgins Bellingcat methodology applied to nineteen through four hundred and seventy nine photos. Here's how it works. You're looking through photos. You see something.

Maybe you recognize a person. Maybe you identify a location. Maybe there's a timestamp visible in the corner. Maybe you can read text on documents in the background. You flag it, not with a generic, interesting flag with a specific category. Notable person identified. Location confirmed. Timestamp visible. Documents readable. Suspicious activity observed. Every flag is counted. The platform tracks which photos have the most flags in each category. That's your investigation priority queue. If one person flags a photo for notable person, that's interesting. If one hundred people independently flag the same photo, that's signal. That's where you investigate. And here's the key.

Flags are pseudonymous. You build reputation as an investigator without revealing your identity. Your flagging accuracy determines your If your flags consistently match high ranking. consensus photos, your future flags get more weight. High quality investigators get weighted votes. That prevents spam and gaming. This is how you get signal from noise when you have nineteen four hundred and seventy nine photos and one hundred thousand potential investigators. You aggregate expert judgment. You wait by track record. You surface patterns no individual could see. That's collective intelligence. This is the AI chat bot, but it's not chat GPT making stuff up. This is RAG,

retrieval augmented generation. The AI only answers questions using verified source documents. It can't hallucinate because it's chained to evidence. Ask it, what's Epstein's connection to intelligence agencies? It searches through Whitney Webb's One Nation Under Blackmail, finds page four thirty seven and returns. According to Whitney Webb, U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta stated that Epstein belonged to intelligence and was told to back off. Then it gives you the book title, page number and a URL to verify. Ask it worse. What's the mega group? It searches unlimited hangout articles, finds the relevant passage and returns. The mega group was a secretive gathering

of influential Jewish businessmen formed in nineteen ninety one, including Leslie Wexner, who had close ties to Epstein. Exact quote. Exact source. URL included. The AI can't make up answers because it's only allowed to cite source documents in its knowledge base. If you ask something it doesn't have sources for, it says, I don't have verified information on that. No speculation, no guesses, only evidence. This is how you give a hundred thousand investigators instant access to years of investigative journalism without requiring them to read thousand pages first they ask a question. The Ai finds the relevant passage they verify the source they follow the thread.

Every photo has a discussion thread. This is where the community does the actual work. This is where collective intelligence happens. Example. Someone's looking at a photo. There's a building visible in the background. They post, that's the MIT Media Lab. I recognize the architecture. I went to school there. Someone else replies, confirmed. Google Street View match. I can see the same geometric panels. Coordinates, forty-two point three six oh five degrees seventy-one oh eight seven three degrees north, west. That's seventy-five Amherst Street, Cambridge. Third person adds, timeline check. That building was completed in March Designed by Fumihiko Maki, twenty-ten.

so this photo has to be post-twenty-ten. That narrows the date range. Fourth person, wait, look at the car in the lower left. That's a twenty-twelve Tesla Model S. So this is twenty-twelve or later. That's collective intelligence. One person spots the building. Another geolocates it. A third establishes the timeline. A fourth notices the car. No single investigator has all that knowledge. But the community collectively does. That's how Bellingcat identified the Buck missile launcher that shot down MH-seventeen. Crowd-sourced verification. And it's all pseudonymous. You build reputation through quality contributions, not by revealing who you are. Your username earns credibility.

Your identity stays private. The picture isn't live yet, but it's coming. Here's how it works. We've already detected five thousand and twenty six faces across nineteen four hundred and seventy nine photos using computer vision. Every person visible in every photo. That's done. What's coming next is clustering. The AI groups faces by similarity. It doesn't know who they are. It just knows these twenty three faces look like the same person. So it creates a cluster. Unknown person, Nightweaver forty seven appears in twenty three photos across eight different locations. You click that cluster. It shows you all twenty three photos. Timeline, two thousand four through two thousand seven.

Little St. James, Manhattan townhouse, Paris, London. You see patterns the FBI refuses to investigate, and then the community identifies them. Someone recognizes unknown person, Mare-Forty-Seven. That's name, CEO of company. Here's a photo from his LinkedIn for comparison. They provide evidence. The community verifies it. Once you hit consensus, say, twenty independent confirmations, the cluster gets labeled. Now you search for that person by name. You get all twenty three photos sorted chronologically. You see who else appears with them. You build timelines. You map networks. This is how you answer questions like, who attended events at Little St. James? Who appeared in multiple cities with

Epstein? Who's in photos with both Epstein and Gates? The AI finds the faces. The community identifies them. The platform maps the network. And the FBI can't stop it because the photos are public domain. Also coming soon, export and sharing tools. Because investigation isn't just about finding things. It's about documenting what you found and sharing it with the world. Find something important, export a PDF report, all the flagged photos, all the timestamps, all the locations, all the discussion excerpts, chain of evidence documented in a single file. You can hand that to a journalist. You can submit it to law enforcement. You can publish it yourself, fully sourced, fully verifiable.

Want to share a specific finding with someone? Generate a shareable link. This photo cluster shows five people who all appear together across twelve different events spanning three years. The link includes all the photos, all the metadata, all the context. Someone clicks it and they see exactly what you saw. No, trust me bro, they see the evidence. Investigating a specific person, export every photo they appear in, sorted chronologically. Timeline analysis ready to go. You see them in Little Saint James in two thousand and four, Manhattan in two thousand and five, Paris in two thousand six, London in two thousand seven, back to Little Saint James in two thousand eight. Pattern established.

The platform isn't just for browsing, it's for building cases. And those cases need to be exportable, shareable and preservable, because when one hundred thousand people are investigating, findings need to spread. That's how you bypass mainstream media. That's how crowdsourced investigation becomes crowdsourced journalism. So here's what we're dealing with. The FBI has conducted exactly zero investigations into the most obvious election irregularities we've documented. Not one single meaningful investigation Zero. into the statistical impossibilities we've laid out. But here's the thing. We don't need them anymore. We have something more powerful than any centralized bureaucracy.

We have one hundred thousand citizen investigators. But I mean real investigators, people pulling voter rolls, analyzing registration data, cross-referencing death records with voting histories. These aren't conspiracy theorists sitting in basements. These are accountants, data analysts, former military intelligence officers, retired cops, people who know how to follow evidence and document fraud. And the results speak for themselves. In Michigan alone, our citizen investigators have identified over forty thousand questionable voter registrations. In Pennsylvania, they've documented thousands of ballots cast from vacant lots and demolished buildings. Now,

the establishment wants you to believe that centralized authority is more reliable than distributed investigation. but that's backwards thinking. When you have one hundred thousand people examining the same data from different angles using different methodologies, cross-checking each other's work, you get better results than three FBI agents in a conference room deciding not to look. This is the future of accountability. Distributed investigation beats centralized cover-up every single time. We're proving it right now. So here's what I want you to do right now. Don't bookmark this for later. Don't say you'll get to it tomorrow. Do it now, while this information is fresh in your mind.

Go to technocracyatlas.comepstein.hub. That's technocracyatlas.com slash epstein slash hub. When you get there, you're going to see a simple email sign It takes literally ten seconds to enter up form. your email address, ten seconds. And then I want you to run one search, just one type in any name that comes to mind. Maybe it's someone from your local government. Maybe it's a business leader in your Maybe it's someone you've heard mentioned community. in connection with these networks, but you weren't sure about the details, here's what's going to happen. You're going to see connections you never knew existed. You're going to understand how these influence networks actually operate in the

real world. Not theory, not speculation, hard data with sources you can verify yourself. I mean, we've spent the last hour talking about how Jeffrey Epstein's network wasn't just about one man. It was about a systematic approach to building influence and control across institutions. The technology sector, academic institutions, scientific research, policy think tanks, these connections are still active today. Now you have the tools to see it for yourself. The technocracy atlas puts that investigative power directly in your No waiting for journalists to connect the hands. dots. No relying on incomplete reporting that misses the bigger picture. But this only works if you actually use

it. Knowledge without action is just entertainment. And frankly, we're past the point where we can afford to be entertained by corruption while doing nothing about it. So go to technocracyatlas.com Epstein Hub, enter your email, run that first search, and start building your own understanding of how power really operates in America today. The networks are counting on you to stay in the dark. Prove them wrong. So here's what I need you to understand. You don't need to unravel their entire web of corruption overnight. That's not how this works. I mean, look at what happened with Hunter Biden's laptop. The mainstream media buried that story for but it only took one connection, two years,

one email linking Joe Biden to those business deals. And suddenly the whole big guy narrative started falling apart. I'm telling you this because I see people Now, getting overwhelmed. They think they need to expose everything at once, the Federal Reserve, the World Economic Forum, the entire administrative state, and they burn out. But that's not how we win. We win by finding one thing they missed, one document they thought nobody would read, one connection they assumed would stay buried, one witness they didn't pay off. Take January We don't need to prove everything was staged. We just need one text message from Nancy Pelosi's office showing they refused National Guard assistance,

one security video they don't want you to see, one Capitol Police officer willing to tell the truth about what really happened that day. And here's the thing. They're sloppy. These people are so arrogant, so convinced of their own invincibility that they leave trails everywhere. bank records, email chains, flight logs, phone calls. So your assignment is simple. Pick one story they're pushing, just one. Maybe it's the Ukraine funding. Maybe it's the COVID vaccine data. Maybe it's what's really happening at the Find one thing they don't want you to border. know, one fact they're hiding, one lie they can't explain, because that's how we take them down. Not with conspiracy theories, with facts,

with evidence. with the truth they thought they buried. That's how we win, one connection at a time. So there you have it. That's the kind of initial preview of this thing. Happy to do the live Q&A. You know, I mean, I put together some of the slides. I'm still, as I said, I'm doing a lot of updates. As you can see, there's quite a bit of work that went And there's a lot more work that I'm into that. putting into it because the point is to make the tool simple. What I'm actually doing right now,

kind of behind the scenes, I'm trying to create a, I have a new song. Obviously, I have all the songs in the beginning. I do want to say that a lot of people have asked me about the songs and they don't even realize that I generated them. using AI. So you can actually see the songs at the airanddayshow.com. There's a memes and music section. You can actually, there's a music player on there if you want to listen to the songs. And I'm increasingly creating music videos, which you may have seen at the very beginning. I started this really in the last, you know, couple of weeks. And which is what I'll show you when I do the episode with Mike Adams, I've developed a whole suite of tools for

developing these music videos. And it's like with everything else, I put stuff out here in its developing form. So everything that I'm doing, I'm learning and making improvements. So if you listen to the first song that I wrote about raising awareness about Roger Ver's case over a year ago now, well over a year ago, maybe a year and a half, I don't know. compared to some of the new songs, it's amazing what happened and how, how the process goes. So I went from, from songs to then having, you know, images with like a sound visualizer to then doing some crude videos to now I've got this kind of multi complicated system, which you know,

sometimes when I try to tweak it, it actually makes it more difficult to actually take a few steps back. But I'm telling you that by the end of this year you're going to see or TV, not this year, twenty twenty six, you will see full length movies that are generated. I mean, in fact, I mean, I say that because I could create them. I mean, I you know, it's they're expensive to do. But I mean, I know what the technology is and how you would go about piecing that together. It's about designing these systems and designing processes and then tweaking those processes over time and then automating those processes and even the stuff that i've been able to do incrementally you know some of it's a

little bit hokey now but but you know wait five five music videos from now you'll probably be like oh wow that's that's actually pretty cool is that a real you know is that a professionally done video or not um so with that said this i i was really scrambling you know as i said at the beginning the emergency on this was um I was trying to get this thing launched You know, and then yesterday I had a whole big issue with the entire, the entire database. And like I said, the technocracy Atlas is not officially Like this is still beta. launched. Um, by the end of January, it will be solid enough that I can say it's a full working product. That doesn't mean that you can't use it or test it.

But a lot of what I described that goes into this, the different AIs that are being used to analyze the pictures in a variety of different ways. Actually analyzing the content of the picture as opposed to just looking at the caption. Actually doing full OCR on all of the legal documents. That's really time consuming kind of to I've got a dedicated computer that has set this up. been doing nothing but Epstein related document and image stuff. And keep in mind, we have over a hundred thousand documents now and twenty thousand pictures roughly. Now, this next data dump may be ten times that size. Although, you know, once you take out the redactions,

whatever, it should at least double the size of these files. And so the challenge is, where do you start? And so this is why we put together these crowdsource systems that use your kind of reputation management, everything else. I'm going to tie incentives into it as well. And What I didn't mention there is, and this is where Zaino is important. I'm going to tie in the ability for you to use your Zaino wallet to log in. So right now, when you log in, you'll see that there's this magic link. So I don't even want to have passwords, right? I mean, some of the sites, I'm going to fix this because, you know, every site that I have is a different sign up. It's annoying, but on the other hand,

everybody isn't necessarily interested in all six of the sites. But one thing I'm implementing is the ability to use your Zeno wallet, which means that your identity remains completely private. But you'll be able to use your alias moving forward as your way of building reputation. And this will actually carry across all of the different sites. I mentioned earlier that, oh, nothing is going to be a big part of this, but I want to implement an incentive system, but where you reward it not for participation trophy stuff, but whether you actually took a tangible step that could be measured to improve your sovereignty. And I'm kind of figuring out that probably won't be pulled out until the end of

the first quarter, if not a little bit beyond that, maybe even in the Q two. But the idea here is, What I've experienced, and by the way, if you want to join the live chat, I'm happy to answer questions about Technocracy Atlas or anything, or just have a general chat as we do on here. I know I was late to, well, this podcast is not on the normal day, and it got a bit screwed up at the last minute. So we have still up to eleven hundred people, which is good, given all things considered, and considering the fact that I didn't even have an opportunity to fully market this. I'm hoping that ultimately this will get a lot of replays, but I'm happy to chat with with anyone

about technocracy outlets or any of the different different themes here. And oh, good. All right, good. I've got a good I've got a new a new music video. This this one, I think might become the anthem. So I'm coming up on anthems for each of the websites. I've already got a Daylight Anthem. We have the Final Countdown, which is based on my book. But this next one is for Technocracy

Atlas. And I think it actually really encompasses what I'm going for here, which is trying to also break down the generational provisions on a lot of this stuff. Because we do have one common enemy. That common enemy is technocracy. It's really us versus, like, five hundred people. Like, that's actually how warped the power dynamics are. So we get caught up in a lot of, you know, generational divide and a lot of these other things. And it's really a shame. Hey, how are you? Hey, doing good. And how are you doing today? Good. Great show.

Good stuff. I really like what you guys did with the Epstein stuff. Yeah. It needed it. And did you happen to hear the Danny Jones interview the other day where they had great researcher talking about the the Epstein stuff I I didn't but um I will because one of the things that I didn't mention is there's a social media component to this as well where where I want people to be able to upload links so I know Mike Benz has been talking about a lot of stuff the whole point is this be an aggregation point and you know some of this came with when um when Jack Cruz made some claims about Bitcoin and the

ties to my land. I did an episode on that and I'm like, you know, eighty percent of this can be validated. The other twenty percent can't. Maybe we need an ability to crowdsource whether or not this kind of stuff is true. So do you know who it was with, who the interview was with? Hold on. I can tell you real quick. I can look it up. Also, you've got to look up Patrick Byrne just did an interview on info wars with alex jones about i guess it's about four days ago um and uh knew you were saying they're not doing anything about the election stuff well i thought that too but of course that's what patrick does and has been and he said he's finally got he thinks they're finally

starting to move on stuff in there uh he also connected pam bondy and uh what's trump's chiefs of staff name um susie Susie Wilde, miles both of them were lobbyists for Ballard Partners, right? Well, guess the basically the CFO of the Cartel of the Sun from Venezuela, who owns a ton of businesses here in the United States and everything. He hired those guys multiple times. So there's the connection right there. Laura Loomer, paid by Chevron, which is Venezuela. Instantly tried to copy. Yeah, there's a lot of these people.

I did not realize how deep these were. Patrick does a great job. Look that one up. Let's see. Jason. Here's the guy. Hold on. Let me make sure it doesn't play. Jason. Is it Hany? J-O-R-J-A-N-I. And I've heard, I've watched this guy one other time and amazing historian on the movements of the Nazis into infiltrate our obviously scientific, but also our CIA. Basically the OSS became the CIA with the

help of about thirteen, fourteen hundred Nazi intelligence officers. uh so paperclip was not just about the eleven hundred or you know uh scientists it was also about the intelligence operations yeah yeah well there's that yeah there's so many different i will say though i i honestly the patrick burns stuff i you know there comes a point on this where it's like last thing i saw is well you know guys i've been lying to you all along i've been part of the cia for thirty years at some point i'm kind of like sick of this yeah no i get you on that when he said he was part of the cia yeah yeah he went on there he said oh i've been lying to

you guys i said that i had some affiliation with the fbi and some other thing but then he went off on some i'm actually one of the top people in the world that's got the some special attribution to the cia going back thirty years and i got that was on alex jones probably a couple weeks ago and i'm like you know what i didn't hear i gotta go listen to that one yeah you should listen to that one because by the way he started talking about the venezuela stuff too and then he's on there and i'm kind of like god damn you know he does seem to be getting involved in the middle of a lot of this stuff but which didn't make sense right like the the whole bouncing around on some of these issues while he

was at overstock working on blockchain stuff and now it's like the fact that he's saying he's been involved with the cia for thirty years that's a bit of a red flag uh yeah that because i mean he's always been against this he's always talked about being against this he's done a few peace things here and there he talks about what he did over in vietnam you know for for people but never did he ever uh he's almost like the anti-cia yeah you got to find that clip because yeah because then maybe all of his stuff has been i mean i've actually gotten to the point where with a lot of people that I previously thought were were Liberty people and I'm now wondering if

they're assets I mean and you have burned explicitly stating that he hasn't been an asset and so so the fact that he so so in that same segment he went on and said well this is why we should be promoting regimes change in Venezuela so this guy's bounced around from you know he's like Forrest Gump right he broke up insider trading with the what's his name and then and then and then you know he's he's stopping government stock market corruption and naked short selling and then he moves on to this russian thing and then he moves on to voting and now he's in venezuela it's like okay well you know um yeah well the venezuela all goes back to the um smartmatic stuff from

the twenty twenty election which that is true i i myself personally went to the sec and traced all of that it's all right there in the sec documents that the source code that i mean the not the source The software running on those Dominion machines, all of the machines, ENS machines, is all straight from Venezuela. Well, you know, look, hey, maybe something's going to happen. Maybe I could be surprised. But at this point, by the way, same thing. How many times have we heard Alex Jones say the indictments are coming, the indictments are coming? He's been wrong on almost everything this year. Yeah, he has. I agree. There's been just so much, you know, that where nobody's going to jail and

they're still trusting Trump. I just dropped you a link. Have you heard of the DIRDS? The Defense Intelligence Reference Documents. These have been called, well, I say here, you can read it. This is Hal Rudolph, Eric W. Davis, all the big they wrote these and were created up until and then it took them like eight or nine years to foia and we got of the reports and this is a lot of

the most advanced science that we have so you may want to add this into some of your uh these documents are incredible uh As we're talking, I'm adding it right now. You know what? Yeah, this stuff is... I love it when you come on here because every time we... I got the other data dump on there too. Oh, I got a few more too. Well, I got one right here. I'll give you another one here. You may have already added these. I'm going to give you... It's called offshore leaks. I think this is the Panama Bay question. If you remember those. Oh, yeah. Panama Papers. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. I haven't looked at that.

I've had this one. That's sitting up on my desktop till the next time I can get on with you for this offshore leaks database. I'm adding that too. All right. We've got another, we have a new Here we go. The new guest here, Zach. Zach, how are you? Hey, you know me. Oh, yeah, I know you. Of course I know you. You changed the name. Okay, I see. I did change the name, yeah. How y'all doing? I'm doing all right. Good, how are you? It's fascinating about everything that's just being... You're unraveling a lot,

both of y'all. And it's just fascinating how... At this point, they're just in the upper echelon of the upper echelon, the elite, whatever you want to call them. They're in hyperdrive right now, trying to bury as much as they can, and they can't. Well, I mean, they're doing a generally good job. And the question with all of this is, are people going to care? Because I like I said, one of the things I don't want to spend too much time on the technocracy Atlas, particularly moving into twenty twenty six, because I'm like, we've got to get people using the Google phones and using privacy coins and getting out of the insurance system and everything And so it's kind of like park like else.

there's a part of me that's like this is a distraction. It's only not a distraction if people come to the conclusion that the system is so fundamentally broken, they need to actually work on parallel systems. Like this could go break bad in a whole variety of ways where it's like all of a sudden, oh, well, now that this information is out, they're going to arrest people, right? That would be a bad outcome because, you know, then we can start investigating the judicial system itself, right? Because that's not exactly a place where you can go for justice or a reasonable process. But see, like there's a, how would we go around doing that? It's all interlinked with one another.

And you just, even the judiciary, you're not gonna, like who investigates the judiciary at that point? No one. So, I mean, we can do it publicly, but again, there's a certain point. And I mentioned this earlier, I was talking to a friend of mine and he said, look, I heard you say America One.O is over. And he was bummed about it. And then he didn't believe it at first, actually. And then he actually started testing some of the things that I said. And then he finally came back and said, hey, you know what? You're right. And we're running out of time. And I'm kind of like, yeah, well, you know, good news, bad news, right? But it's good when you do realize it because you can actually spend time

working on it. But yeah, you're not going to investigate the judiciary. And they have so many processes in place. I mean, even the whole process of how NDAs work and how people are silenced, there's no mechanism within the system for self-correction. And so once you realize that that's the case, then you stop trying to fix it. And then you realize you've got to build something else. So it's just constant building and building and innovating. That's basically what we need to do is just keep on building. That's the only way we win in the long run. They build, we build, they build, we build. It's just a never-ending story. It's literally like the movie. It's a never-ending story.

Well, I'm about to play this. I'm working on this music video. It's called Truth Cascade. It's kind of the anthem for this As soon as I can get the captions Technocracy Atlas. synced up with it. I'll play a few minutes long, but it does get at a whole variety of I went through probably two hundred different songs and different ways of going about saying the same thing. But it's like we've got to get all the generations together. We've got to get Boomers and Gen X, Millennials, Gen Z and everything who all have different skill sets. to just expose this stuff and build these But the thing is we have to do alternatives. it in twenty twenty six. I have not been sleeping a lot.

And part of this is like it's crazy hectic trying to even get the podcast pulled together because I realize if for the last couple of years I've been trying to warn people and then I've done these workshops and introduced a few thousand people here to these workshops. It's not even close. It's not enough. We have to be able to scale up these solutions. Based on where digital IDs are globally, if we don't do it next year, we're going to have a really hard time if we don't already have the infrastructure built by twenty twenty seven. Well, you heard they're going to require biometric data for everybody entering the United States now. Yep, I heard that. And this is often the case, you know,

if we travel to other countries. Um, where they collect that and then Mexico starting next year, you know, digital ID, QR codes, biometric screening. I mean, you know, it's just, it's not a great situation and people aren't aware of how coordinated it is. Like the seventeen countries that are rolling out digital ID that have the same four vendors and use the same PR firm to market it to the population. Right. Like it's the Tony Blair's organization. is behind a huge swath of this. Right. And so again, eventually we're going to be able to map this out and it's great to map it out. So long as we're building the alternatives at the same time, because they're,

they're at the point right now where they don't even care. Right. It's like, they're kind of in our face about it. Uh, because, uh, you know, so Mark Passio told me this, I think you guys know, Mark, Mark Passio, he's, um, brilliant guy and but at one point he'd been recruited into uh by lave into the satanic church and he realized it was not what he signed up for but not before having been recruited for um for basically the club of rome to work on eugenics stuff and so he was kind of he's telling he was telling me that from within it's like they're laughing at us they think that doesn't even matter if they know what they're up to that we're too lazy and

and kind of passive to do anything about it that's actually their kind of their their attitude about it which they may be right they are right yeah yeah it's funny you bring up lave and his shirts of satan because like The public appeal of it is it's Satanism. It is Satanism, but it's Satanism to its real core, which is the worship of the self and the desire, but it goes deep because it's all a part of the same occultist sect, this eugenist cult of Luciferianism that goes back to Madame Lebrowski and Alistair Crowley and all this. The Club of Rome, nobody... I don't think anybody really knows about the Club of Rome, but I mean,

it's all they're all interlinked in some capacity, even little old Anton LaVey. I think he was a peon, but he was pretty well connected. he had connections into the military Yeah, no, industrial complex and some and some. some CIA relations. He was actually supported into that role and then used for some of these blackmail things, just like you were mentioning here. He was an asset. Yeah. What's his, what's his strength? Like to the, to the normal lay person, they would, they would listen to you and be like, what, what are you talking about? No, he was just a Satanist. Yeah. Just an evil, evil person and kind of stupid. But in reality, it goes deeper than that.

Yeah. And you brought up a good point that Yeah. people think about Satanism and it's like, you know, worshiping and like ripping people's hearts out and everything else. And it's not that it's actually, it's all about, uh, uh, focus on full, full focus on yourself to the exclusion of everyone else. And people are not paying attention to that. I see Nance H is here, but it says device is not connected. So, Nancy, I'm assuming this is Nancy, maybe Nancy Hardwick, whatever. Try joining again and we'll try to get you up. It's great to always have new people hopping into the chat. Well, one of the things that we've got to build besides a lot of, you know, I like the medical freedom stuff you're

building, everything is energy freedom. And now that we know that fusion not only is possible, it's been happening for a couple of decades. don't know if you guys looked at if you've looked at uh recent stuff with tae energy the the company that trump just merged with they have made a massive um improvement in their in their uh fusion generator uh basically is this the thing at washington state yeah uh washington state is no that's helium energy building that's what's being built for um for Microsoft's data center. And they're already, that's broken ground. That's going to be operative in twenty twenty eight. Now,

TAE was supposed to have theirs operational in twenty thirty, but they basically just cut out. They've actually they they're they cut out a whole generation. They were going to build this one that they're working on now. or the one that they just completed, they were going to build another one and then another generation. They're skipping this middle generation because of this improvement that they've made, which is massive in spinning up plasmatoids. And we discovered this science back in the late sixties. We perfected this in the eighties and nineties. And, you know, and now it's open source. I mean, it's it's simple that's what things are what i

think they've been hiding now i dropped you did you see that ecat uh new fire that i dropped to you aaron i i believe so i think i sent it already yes ecat i already got it i've already got it ingesting oh okay well i just found this This week, like five days ago. This guy, apparently, he's out of Miami. And he's Andre Rossi. And I'll send you a link to his research papers. These units are three centimeters high. They're circular, about six centimeters in circular. They put out ten watts, ten watts of power, ten years nonstop. Then they can be refurbished for about

another eight and a half years. You can stack them together. They got them up to five kilowatts. And then I see the things the size of a bread box. There's a data sheet. If this is for real, if this guy is for real and he's got a, you can pre-order now. I went ahead and pre-ordered. They don't take any money to the orders. let you guys ingest a lot of it but if this is for real this is and this is energy freedom one of the ways uh like i'm i don't know if you guys watch look have been looked into

like the thunderstorm generator the heat things like that i i keep up with all that stuff you're way far ahead of it this is an area that i need to spend more time i've written a book about it though Well, I've been there. I went there. I was a couple of, I want to write some books. I got to get some tokens to write some books. And one of them, uh, autobiography, not me, but a buddy of mine that passed, I have, um, but I got to get some tokens to, to, to try that out. I think he's opening that up. I'll, I'll, uh, I'll find out. Maybe I can see it. You can do three. I checked it yesterday. I think of the day before you can do like three chapters for free. Uh, but you know, um,

I don't want to do that. I'm going to try it for real. If I'm going to use it, Maybe I'll ask him if he'll do some special partnership thing with Daylight. I don't even know what that means. It's free. Obviously, I promote his stuff all the time. There's no financial relationship there. I'm wondering if you're willing to help to allow us to help help because there's some other people craig was one of my co-authors uh craig winklewich was on here and i know he's got some books he wants to do as well and so maybe there's something we can do on that oh that'd be awesome yeah yeah there's i got the sheer amount of books that are being turned out there is blowing me away i

can't keep up and there's like four or five i want to read i started reading the red light therapy one and there's a couple others i want to um I mean, he left me a message. He said to upgrade his database system. He said that, you know, on the vibe coding front, it's good. But sometimes when you get into some of these more complex things, this is what I found as well. It's like you have to really, the key to all of this is developing your kind of structure of reusable processes and advisors to make that Bulletproof. And there's a point where it's just, it takes time and trial and error to get all that down. But once you get it down, it's like, wow. Okay. Um, like I, I will show people, um,

I'm going to pre pre-record with him and then I'll probably then after that kind of a dog and pony show with what I'm doing here. Oh, I'm having a hard time getting the, uh, offshore leaks. Did the rec CSV download or block? The bulk data requires authentication for special assets. That's about to play around with that one. So the ECAT is complete. Fifty-one pages indexed to the ECAT research collection. Good. And there was another one. Yeah, there was the DIRDS, the Defense Intelligence reference documents.

Now that one should go through. I mean, that's just thirty seven PDFs. Great. The links there. This is great stuff. Yeah, I look forward to it. the word on the street is you take Well, all these research, not just these, I mean, but, you know, like how Budoff's documents and. charles chase and um that's that guy that was on uh brogan not too long ago he works down he's worked for nasa and you put them into the ais uh and they spit you out a fusion machine wow oh that's the uh now i i haven't gotten good enough to do that yet but uh i can i well like i've watched

what you've done i got a buddy um who's our age and was a programmer last century, built a bunch of companies, you know, more went into the management stuff and hiring programmers. And two weeks ago, we've been kicking around some ideas. He sat down and started messing around with the AI programming. Literally, what would take me, if I had five programmers working together, it would take six months to do. He's done in a week and a half. Oh, yeah. Unbelievable stuff. Yeah, no, it is. It is truly unbelievable. This is why. But I think there's going to be a there truly will be a bifurcation in society. The people that are saying, oh, you know,

it's not real or I'm not going to use it or whatever. The thing about it is that it's your cumulative use. And then it's it's. having all the trials and errors and then getting your data configured and getting all the stuff set up. And then at some point you reach a point where it's like, I just have to write one sentence and it does an entire, you know, year's worth of work. That's literally what happens at some point. But if people don't start, I can't even imagine what the Delta is going to be and, and productivity, knowledge, empowerment between people that are not using it at all and then people that are just are plugging away at it and continuing to learn. Yeah, I completely agree now.

I mean, what I've seen him produce and continuously produce because we're working on some of this stuff and I'll talk to you about it when we're ready because there's we're going to do some stuff with Zeno, too. So that's yeah. Yeah. Some really cool tools we're working on here. I think that'll I'm not on the wrong mic. Somebody's saying I'm on the wrong mic. I'm actually not on the wrong mic. So I just have to get the distance But I did double check that one. right. I did wonder, jumping into this, did I do that again? But fortunately, I'm not taking my computers with me anymore. So I'm accessing them remotely. So my setup here now does not change. So you'll get all of the screw ups

when I'm traveling. Uh, hopefully we won't have the technical problems when I'm, when I'm home, but, but when I'm not home, uh, there's always some sort of, some sort of issue, usually internet connection related. Yeah. I've been noticing there's been a lot of strange internet interruptions. Yeah. Interesting. Yeah. And I'm cause for work I'm, I'm on the internet and using zoom and, calling all over the place all over the country and yeah this i see the slowdowns and stuff during the day it's weird and it's they're anomalous they're not like you know happen all the time at the certain times or whatever um

do you think that could be that there's a lot of people laid off that are just on the internet or could it be a data breach somewhere or just a data takeover just with all these all this different ai energy and yeah that they're working on well it could be a lot a lot of things i mean obviously we're what was it was the cloud fair or was it aws that went down a few weeks ago and infected aws yeah i mean of course that you know when you're funneled through you know, three or four companies that do handle some aspect of everything. Um, the chick was telling me, uh, she's been noticing and keeping up with There's lots of small power outages going it. on around the country.

Like she was looking in Florida like two days ago and nothing big, but like five hundred on a clear day, little areas and other infrastructure. you know, I'm I think we've been getting probed a lot. Um, chinese koreans things like that uh probing our infrastructure um could be the venezuelans too because could be yeah they're a little pissed off at us right now um could be israel just because it's israel yeah israel i mean why is it that if you go to look up google searches every time right before something big happens like the guy who shot the

uh the two National Guard people in Washington right before the guy shot Charlie Kirk. Somebody somewhere in Israel searches out that person's name. Yeah, I see that. Yeah. I've seen him report that. I haven't verified it myself. Sorry, can you guys hear me okay? Because California Contrarian is sitting here saying that my mic is... I'm definitely not on the wrong mic, but are you guys having a hard time hearing me? No, not that. I can definitely hear you. Does it sound like it? What happened last time, it's not that my mic wasn't plugged in. I have three different mics, and I had the StreamYard setting set to the wrong mic.

The StreamYard setting is set to the right mic, and it is this mic. Nobody else is having a hard time. Okay. I don't think this time. It's a little tangy, like you're in a room, but I'm in a big room. I'm in a big room. That is true. And then I do have this thing that I mentioned with the, when the heater goes on, it sounds like an aircraft carrier. And that I can't do anything about because If I shut it off, it's freezing here. it's going to be, it's going to be, I guess that's my cryo. You're coming in just fine. My wife says I'm coming in. OK. All right. So this time, this time, I don't think it's me. Hey, let me ask you this. Could your A.I. Let's say we put in a research paper.

Could it look for the references in that research paper and then go through, pull those research documents into it and then the references for that? Sure. Yes. Because really that that's you could get to some deep stuff, especially in in in this high level physics stuff. I just put, you know, you can download data sets i have this i have a hundred and twenty six terabytes now which is the first raid system that i've got i'm gonna build more than that but you can download all of pubmed uh i mean there are data sets out there that are that are just massive and so part of this for me is i've actually got now gotten to the point where this nvidia thing that i have is running my

computer is running all the time so when i go to bed i want to make sure that they're they're downloading something, processing something, using OCR for something. And so now it's like, all right, I need to be more, I need to be careful about what I'm curating. I need to actually be selective about what the information is. I mean, I can add more capacity, but there's a certain point at which still I need to prioritize this stuff. But I did think about that. I actually thought about it from the standpoint of scientific research is mostly BS. Most of it has never been independently validated i mean you can take all of pubmed it actually took from the standpoint of i wonder how much of

this you could prove as fraud yeah of all of everything in pubmed like i i'm pretty sure if you put it in there and cranked it out you'd be able to say kind of like the own nothing index or whatever it's like yeah here you know here's here's the score for the entirety of pubmed oh wow that that would be that'd be hilarious or are the um VARS vaccine. Oh, yeah, absolutely. That would be, oh, my God. Well, she could probably do that against classical physics that's been going on for the past thirty years because they've been lying to us a hundred percent. Yep.

A hundred percent. I just got this latest thing you sent me, so I'm... yeah see that's what uh now look at that that was from two thousand and five transverse transportation via wormhole wormhole teleportation that was like in two thousand five and that's exactly what they did to m uh mh three seventy traversable wormhole engineered as stargate via einstein's general relativity theory wow wow this is uh All right, what are traversable wormholes? Part one, wow. Where do you get this stuff? Well, it's real stuff. Oh, I know, but it's like, wow,

interesting. Well, yeah, I got this bug in the fusion in great Ashton Forbes, is what turned me on. And there's a lot here they're not telling us. And it's amazing. I mean, this... The other day, I watched Salvador Pais give the mathematical formula for backwards time travel. He laid out the mathematical formula. And if you don't know who Pais is, he's the guy who owns the UFO patents for the Navy. Great guy. And the Pais effect, which is superconductivity at room temperatures. Wow.

he's co-author on uh which is amazing i mean we got super negativity is so easy now i mean simple vibration no it's uh but the wormholes it's it's it's fluid dynamics and electromagnetic dynamics the all of it and it's the same it's quantum there's no you know this difference between newtonian physics and quantum physics doesn't exist it's turtles all the way down so you can apply the same formulas you apply to fluids to the ether and add in the magnetic the electromagnetic formulas and and you you

break the schwimmer limit uh you got true nothing no space no nothing once you can create nothingness You can go anywhere. And it's amazing. Now, if we look at toroids, you're probably going to see a lot of stuff talking about toroidal magnets and toroids. Of course, plasmoids are all over. They found them in thunderstorms, and they're used in this fusion that TAE and Helion's using. Malcolm Bendall was a prodigy of a guy, Ed, I want to say Ed Bernaske,

but it's not his name. But they used, he built a plasmoid machine for healing. Plasmoids are used in the thunderstorm generator. Plasmoids are what's created that cause the cavitation effects around a propeller. You know, that cause, if you've ever seen a boat propeller after years, it's got all these pot marks in it. And it's because of the implosions caused by the negative vacuum of the propeller in the water. And it's actually creating a plasmoid that then implodes and then an enormous amount of energy comes out of that. These ECAT things, I can't figure out what he's doing there.

He talks about it. I've read some of his papers, but I don't know how he's achieving it. But God, yeah, I mean, if these two come in soon, well, supposedly they're going to get to a million units ordered and then they start, they got like a three point five million dollar manufacturing plan that they're going to crank up. But you could run a, you know, raspberry pie for ten years on one little twenty five dollar unit. Yeah. So I have the I have an ECAT Well, it's fascinating. research group bundle being added to the technocracy chatbot that has both of the

data set, the two data sets that you gave me originally, and then I have, I might have just found an alternative data source to the ICIJ offshore Panama papers. So anyway this stuff should be live on the technocracy atlas hopefully so sweet so i can go in there and start asking the questions about all this stuff hopefully you should be able to i might have to tweak every time i do this i've got to get more sophisticated with there's so much data in there now that there's kind of like there's got to be a way to route it being an intelligent way to route which data collection to go through um and that's so on So it'll be there. Whether or not you can find it is

another thing, which I'm working on that. That will become easier. But of course, I've just loaded it with all of this Epstein stuff. I'll give you a solution for that in probably thirty to sixty days. there are multi agent systems. Well, I mean, There are a lot of different ways to go about doing this. I just need to upgrade some of the stuff. Problem is now I have a whole bunch of this stuff in my RAG system and then they're serving multiple different websites. So I've actually, I've moved the OSR originally. It was like, okay, I had a map that showed you all the different locations and you can figure out where to go. And I'm like, you know what? I found that when I was QAing the

First of all, site, people couldn't download the map. The map was so heavy to load because you had that, that it was breaking the user experience. But now I'm like, well, wait, we have all of the data. We have all of the data on all of the prices of all of the hospitals that report pricing, which is only thirteen point seven percent And then we have a database of all of them. of the prices of all of the medical tourism and all these other countries. Well, so what the actual user wants is how much does this cost where I am versus what the alternative is that nobody frankly cares about? all of the global data, they want to understand how it affects them personally.

So I've re-envisioned this to now be a much more intuitive chatbot that's pulling from those sources. But that is actually the hard work. So it's the hard work of making sure that the data is accurate and up to date, and then making sure that the way that it's laid out, the way that it's accessed is good. This is one of the benefits of doing six sites at the same time. You end up learning something that you can apply other places. And so it's like, there's like six different sandboxes going on at one time. Yeah, that's what we're kind of experienced with what my buddy's doing right now. What do you think about this? It just happened in silver.

Which part? Going way up or going way down? Well, both. It hasn't gone way down. It went down to, what, seventy-two. I mean, it went up to over eighty in a week and went down to seventy two. I don't consider that down. But it has been volatile as hell. That's that's huge volatility for silver. I don't know. I have a heart. I was actually talking to somebody about this. Just yesterday, you know, to me, because then there was the rumor that some systemically important bank actually went under or whatever on sunday which was unsubstantiated although certainly believable but that it was related to uh being on the wrong side of silver and having to sell i have no idea to

be honest with you i have no idea these markets are so rigged i don't have any actual intelligent thing to say about it other than inherently we know these markets are rigged And we certainly know how many how many times has JP Morgan been fined for illegal activity and trying to manipulate these markets or actually been found to have like, oh, yeah, it's painted rocks or whatever. It's like the amount of fraud just by JP Morgan Chase in the silver industry is is remarkable. So but what did they do? They did the same thing that they did with the Hunt Brothers, right? They raised the reserve requirements. Something like that. I don't know what they did. What's been going on?

I know future gold is now negative. I mean, future deliveries a year out, which is now negative to current, which usually supply is always more in the coming years, which is a problem. I know companies like Samsung just bought a silver mine because they want direct access. They're developing their new silver core batteries, which are like twice as good as normal EV batteries. But the silver demand is going way up. I just drove past last week about three more mega solar farms going up here in Florida, North Florida, which they're just cranking those out up

here, which is full of silver. And then they're going to be replacing those all the time. The big solar farms are a joke. I don't know if you, did you guys see what happened to that one last year in Texas after the, uh, the, the hail storm? No, no, they had one that they got it. Finally got it on the line. Hellstone took out like, of course. So, uh, Yeah. Yeah. obviously when generations not working, not going to work and Trump signs a, a billion dollar thing for boiling water with old nuclear. and old Westinghouse while he buys direct energy, direct electrical conversion,

TAE Energy. So that's a bunch of smoke and mirrors. And that's going to be the big play. I mean, good God, can you imagine if we did not need fossil fuels for electrical generation? I agree with you. Energy is one of the other issues. It's kind of like money, healthcare, food, and then you write energy. It's the one that I know the least about, but it is obviously critically important. What I do know about it, the funny thing is all of this stuff, pious and everything else, I learned about a lot of this stuff from David Wilcock originally before he went off to reservation um but what i read is that

that book that he wrote source field investigations is actually a good book if you if you go and read the references that's one where you mentioned that's one where you just scrape the references on this anything where anybody starts talking about insiders and you know their insight knowledge or whatever that's usually all but um need a lot of really good information in there about energy and a whole variety of different topics so that was years and years ago Um, but, uh, the one, the one takeaway, the one thing about energy independence is, you know, how do we deal with the fact that we talk about coverups and I need to think about how to do it intelligently using these tools and using the

technocracy outlets, but I'd love to dig into this, uh, Invention Secrecy Act. The fact that there have been over five thousand patents shelved and the way that the government uses the Invention Secrecy Act, most of the inventions, at least as I understand it, that they've suppressed have been energy for a lot of them. So I would think so. So you're right, they've been lying to us. And they actually literally have a process for it. It's literally government policy that enables them to be able to use this Invention Secrecy Act to say, hey, listen, your invention is a threat to national security or economic security, which is vague. there's no way to appeal it. And by the way,

So we're going to take your patent if you even talk about it. It's like being at ten or twenty years in federal prison. And so this has happened over five thousand times. And it's it's outrageous. It's one of the reasons I think Musk largely doesn't file patents. It's not because he believes in open source, but because he understands that by filing the patent, we might actually be prevented. That's a way to prevent someone from entering the market is by stopping it before it even gets commercialized. And it's just an idea. By putting a patent on it, you're putting government control on it. Yeah. So he's basically, well, by putting a patent on it, you put government control on it.

But beyond that, government can actually suppress you from even getting the patent issued to begin with. There's actually a pre-step of being able to cut someone off. And that, I don't know how you would even map something like that. But there are over five thousand people and ventures out there that have had their invention suppressed. And I don't even know if there's like a statute of limitations or anything on that, but that would be interesting to dig into. This would be a good FOIA request. I mean, maybe. You know, after looking at this Epstein stuff, you know, the fact that you can do FOIA requests, they have so many different ways they can weasel out of FOIA requests as well.

Oh, yeah, you have to be persistent. If you ever watch, you ever watch Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch? Yeah. I mean, they are the king. Not lately, but yeah. They are the king. Oh, they just got a, saw him this morning. They just got a four, almost a five million dollar settlement for Ashley Babbitt on January six. So good news amongst the babble. Guys, I'm going to bow out. I've got some things I've got to do before shutting down tonight, but I look forward to catching you in the evening. Thanks for coming on, and yeah, take a look at, wait a couple of days. I've got some other stuff. This is why I'm not like, well,

let's go full on on this. By the end of January, it'll be all buttoned up, and it'll be easy to use, and then I'll be trying to get this to go viral, but you should be able to access the data set. three in the next day or so it's already been uploaded but i have to test it and i've got some other things thank you i'll definitely take a look at it maybe over the weekend i'll give you a few days and then get back with you again i'll have some good news for you on some other fronts here in the next few weeks awesome awesome well thank you very it's always great to have you on and there's always great information so look forward to it especially that ecad stuff Yeah, keep an eye on that.

I'm definitely looking into that more. And go ahead and pre-order some. Because they don't take any money until they start shipping. If you read the pre-order, you're no obligation. So let's get as many pre-ordered out there as we can so they'll start manufacturing All right, guys. them. Take it easy. Have a good one. Bye. Night. Yeah, I mean, speaking of energy, though, like I just read an article locally around my neck of the woods. And I guess some residents around my area are starting a petition, although I don't know what a change that org is going to really do. But but allegedly they're going to be

trying to commercialize land for a large scale solar power farm. Is that a great idea where you're at? No, it's not because it takes it's going to take away not only the beauty, but we have a lot of farmland. I'm in southeastern Indiana. So there's a lot of you got. You got your residential, you have your little towns, but then you have out in the wide open and it's all farmland. I mean, all land resource and by pushing this, it just just puts it pushes industry and commercialization like to to like its last stretch, its last frontier for the most part.

And I mean, it would do so it would it would rip like the entire fabric of the farming industry and the economy and a good chunk of the economy for our area. And then that, I mean, it's an eyesore. I mean, it's not going to really, will it do anything? Probably not. Maybe, but not. I mean, then once you start seeing what you can get out of it, by the time that happens, you'll have to replace the panels. So who's pushing it? Who's trying to build it? uh i think it's outside of like i'm in southeastern indiana so it looks like it's in like ripley county uh which i'm

in dearborn but i guess the article i'm reading that i just read locally was about it's it's going to possibly affect the the countryside of dearborn and ripley county and and uh probably a little bit of like maybe switzerland a little bit although that's a little further south but uh But yeah, I don't know. I don't know what to say about it, honestly. It's just the commercialization is just and this energy push is is definitely stretching in the in the areas that you would never expect. I should. Yeah. There's weird stuff going on with this because on the one hand, there are people who are like, I don't want these data centers here.

But on the other hand, it's one of the biggest sources of new jobs that pay six figures. Construction jobs and data centers pay six figures. And so there's weird alliances that are being formed. People that would normally be perhaps on one side of the issue are not now because of this. And so it's going to be interesting to see what happens with the displacement of jobs and then how that affects some of these other projects. Because they'll probably dangle whatever jobs there are. which are always short-lived. And I mean, it kind of makes sense that I'm reading this now, like I like this came about now because like I think I just read something locally, like in the state next door and over

in Ohio and Butler County, I think they're starting to either. And I think they're they're either in the planning stages or they're thinking about getting into the planning stages of building and like a data center over in Butler County. So perhaps that there's a correlation there. I don't know. I would assume probably because you're going to need all the energy you can get. Yeah, it's pretty. If you're in Indiana and you're trying to use solar to power a data center, you're getting pretty, pretty desperate. You're getting desperate. Exactly. Oh, man. mean i can't imagine i mean i you know i think i told you i grew up in noblesville indiana i just i can't

even imagine indiana's not a great great place for sun no no no especially when you go up to the north and you have you see all the wind farms it's like what is this well like why is why is there so much openness but here's a wind farm I'm just passing the long sixty-five and I just see a row of windmills over here and a row of windmills over here. I'm like, okay. Yeah, you know, New Hampshire, I don't see a lot of that. I don't see, in fact, any wind. I mean, we're working on nuclear. We had nuclear. I think we're going to maybe do more nuclear. I don't know. I don't know what's going to happen. But at least we're not pushing for solar.

in uh in new hampshire i'll give us i'll give us that and i and i haven't seen any wind either so so so far so good on that front i mean solar's solar is not a terrible idea but on an on a large scale and just where we're at in today's day and age now it's just mean it's it's it's pointless it is it is based on where panels are now i you know i actually spent a little time i worked on it with a cleantech company that was based in new mexico for a little while and the founder was a brilliant guy he sold his uh first company he actually created like um do you remember web tv oh yeah So this guy, this guy created like the,

either the precursor to it, or he might've actually sold it to web TV. I can't even remember. He sold his first company and then, um, um, then sold a company to Oracle or whatever. He was a successful internet entrepreneur and he decided he wanted to get into energy. And so he was in, uh, New Mexico and. You had a really cool vision for it. It was kind of like you, you know, everything would run on solar, you know, you'd have, instead of your normal garage, you would have, you know, solar be an outdoor thing. Obviously this was in the South Southwest. It was different. different environment, but, but even down to like, I didn't even realize it until I looked into it, but I guess, you know,

your water heater uses up like, of your, the total amount of energy electricity that you use is actually mostly in your water heater. So, and there's a lot of efficiency in that. So it's like, okay. So that, so I remember we had one of the slides and we were actually working with one of the industrial engineers, uh, or one of the guys that was the head of industrial engineering at Apple previously, not currently, but like, fifteen, twenty years ago. And so he was doing some of the design on this stuff. And so, you know, the big issue was batteries and storage, But if you could figure out the storage, right? and then if you came up with more energy efficient solar panel power,

things like water heaters, then yeah, it actually could be interesting, but not based on the efficiency of solar panels as it existed at the time. But there will come a time where that, you know, will likely change. And you have to start somewhere. Yeah. but you don't have to start in Indiana or in places where it doesn't make like you're not going to get a lot of big ROI bump and and the thing about it is that this is the most interesting thing to see how much of whatever is funding that project is subsidized by the government probably all of it honestly that's the problem with it that's actually that's why I left one of the things that we were doing was so we had this uh solar powered

so street lights and parking lot lights use massive massive amounts of energy and so if if you replace and there's there's actually a good application for this so if you take a big parking lot light and you put a solar panel on on the top and then you convert to leds like you're talking about a major increase in like a major savings where the roi is actually real without subsidies like it's and then what we found was that you know i could make the case of hey you know we would go to like car dealerships and i was talking to at one point auto nation and some other people and it's like hey you know you're gonna get your money back in eighteen months like the roi on it was solid

but what we were competing with were like ge light bulbs that were subsidized by the government everything we were competing against was subsidized so it was an actual superior offering that saved money but it wasn't it didn't win in the marketplace because of the subsidies And that is pretty much the nature of, That's pretty much how the whole thing of that. It's so, works. there are so many laws and regulations and subsidies that prevent actual innovation and energy that it's, it's, it's actually remarkable. Some of the stuff that I learned about while doing that. And then eventually I left because I didn't want to deal with, I didn't want to deal with government.

I didn't want to even get into the subsidy subsidy game. I was attracted to the idea that it this was like a tech entrepreneur who was was, hey, trying to innovate this, you know, archaic industry. And then and then this becomes like a lot of things you realize you can't compete unless you start in these by these rules. And then by playing with these rules, you end up not innovating. And so it's it's a nice little cycle. That's actually I should have brought that up when Deadhead was on because I was interested in energy. And then I realized how what's involved in blocking any real innovation after witnessing, you know, real innovation. Like this guy had a pretty cool lab

in New Mexico and was working on one of the things I had. It was called Regen. It was a solar panel you could put in your window and you could use it to charge your iPhone. Um, you know, again, wouldn't be great where I am now, but I mean, if you were in California or whatever, you can go outside to the park or whatever portable, like, Hey, this is a cool, these are cool products. Right. And then they were, and then they were developed from, by a, an Apple guy. So you had kind of like the design aesthetic. I'm like, Hey, this is, this is cool. This is a cool way of, of tackling this. And so, um, like what we end up with instead are, you know, windmills in places that don't have wind

solar panels in places that don't have sun. And then people having their patents stolen from them and threatened with ten, twenty years of jail time if they talk about their invention. That's what actually goes on in in the America, the quote free market country. Yeah, exactly. And in reality, actually, an idea like that for like charging, like what if. what if you could take that general idea and apply it to the actual inner workings of the development of this of this smartphone that we have and like apply a solar panel right on the outside so like when you're outside you can take your phone out like when the sun's out and charge it i mean something like that would be innovative but

Of course. Yeah. If you really started to innovate with solar panels and different materials and everything, but like, again, I'm not anti-solar as a, like just a, well, we've got a drill baby drill, but I'm anti, like what, Solyndra? And then I remember at the time when I was doing all this, there was another company that was like really popular that I think flopped called Bloom Energy. And it was another one of these, oh, here's a small little device that's going to revolutionize how everything works. it turned out to be, And it, you know, And there are a lot of VCs that Nothing. have really felt go, let's see, it still exists. Bloom Energy. How are you? I don't know if this is the company

or not. Let me see if this is actually the company. Because I had a whole bunch of people had all the top VCs. No, this is it. It's still it's still there. No, yeah. Okay, here we go. I guess they still got a bunch of people. But this was this was like in twenty twelve. This thing was like, oh, this is going to be the first trillion dollar company or whatever. And then when I checked in, you know, now I'm sure they're doing something that's not what they originally were saying. Yeah. But they're a public company manufacturer, solid oxide fuel cells which produce electricity on site, power generation in data centers. So I guess they pivoted to data centers.

I guess this thing is actually. But, you know. I don't know, man. I hope this owe nothing thing, I got to refine it and make it a little bit easier. But what I'm finding is, even with these contracts, the fact that that tweet about the X contract got four point eight million views, people have no idea. And it's not even like X doesn't even have the worst contract. It's not even like, oh, X is the worst. social media contract. It's not great, but it's not the worst. It's standard. And so I find it interesting that just putting out a tweet that restates what's in the agreement in human terms and people Well, I mean, everything is like that. are outraged.

Every contract you sign. So the question is how to get people to wake up quickly enough to actually focus on that. and to make the tools easy. I'm working on it. I've tried some ways that are, I've got to make it easier and I've got to make it more personalized. So if there's a way, because people just care about, well, how does this affect my life? So it's kind of like with politicians. It's like Congress has a whatever, single digit, um approval rating but yet people vote well yeah that's overall Congress but my congressman is is okay right somehow I don't know who these people are but well he's well he's still taking the checks for the district yeah exactly and so it's just

so to try to make this information take all the information it's like yeah no this is how much your hospital is charging you this is how much You're getting ripped off in this particular situation. But to be able to get access to that information in a personalized way, because I think if people saw the entirety of it, you'd be like, you would not be sitting here saying we're defending freedom. We have no freedom. We own nothing here. Exactly. So, you know. it's getting it's getting a lot more out there and i i wish that people were waking up more to it just from the little things but like you don't you can't really own uh physical copies of music anymore people are all we are all going

they're driving to the subscription model like even for like music for movies with like netflix and prime and all like these are all like trivial like concepts for a bigger picture like you're already selling off your ability to own something physical so oh yeah yeah yep yeah well i'm actually i'm going to pull up uh i'm going to pull up the own nothing site because we have something you know again all these have to be you know what i'm doing i got to go through like several more uh iterations but let me hold on let me see all right yeah yeah well you like uh Well, you bring that up.

One thing that's kind of big right now is the fact that all these tech firms like Nvidia and OpenAI, they're starting to consolidate the market while it's ripe and hot because they know that down the road, if they can own it all, then what is it? It's like Nvidia, OpenAI, Oracle. And there's a couple others that are starting to consolidate and buy as much technology and data centers and all that to be the big guys in the AI market down the road. Yeah, OpenAI locked up the market on RAM, I think it was.

RAM, that's what it was. And so, yeah, they put in these contracts, even though they don't technically even have the money. They've signed more contracts than they have any accessible cash to actually fulfill their long term contracts. So I guess they're assuming they're going to be able to raise the money. And I guess they did just raise forty billion today. from SoftBank, but that's exactly, yeah, that's exactly what's happening. So this stuff is being bought up. But this is one of the things on the you own nothing side is like, well, do you actually own anything? Well, do you own your home? Which by the way, you could even debate if you own your home. Let's say you don't have a mortgage.

I mean, the mortgage, if you got a mortgage, do you really own it? I mean, if you have property tax, do you really own it? Yeah. Plus you have the property tax. So like, even if you paid off your, you have a paid off mortgage, like, okay, you're still paying taxes to the government. So, Which if you don't pay them, Yeah. they'll seize your stuff. So do you own your car? Do you own your movies and music? Do you own your own software? Do you own your own phone? Do you own your own data? This is a basic survey, but to help to get people to start thinking about, yeah, do they own anything? I mean, we've been pushed into this. For a while now it's just become the

standard business model, but I mean, it just gets so bad. healthcare and then money itself. And I mean, I mean, if people understood that they don't actually own their four or one K, people need to realize that the next time there's a financial collapse, you're gonna lose your stocks. I mean, it's gonna go end up being owned by the four big commercial banks. People don't know that. And so it's kind of like, all right, so I've got these seven different areas of focus, Eventually, again, the idea is you fill out these surveys, gives you a sovereignty score, and then here's some suggestions. So it's like, all right, here's a step that I can take to improve my sovereignty score. Here's a link.

Here's how to do it. Here are the different things. Because it's got to be actionable. I actually stopped writing. I'll write some more again, but I haven't written a Brownstone article in a long time just because I got tired of people like, oh, this scared the shit out of me. so then at the end, And then it's like, did they do anything about it? Cause then I would see them again and they're like, well, you know, still scared me from the last time. It's like, Oh, did it change anything? No. So it's like spreading doom is not very helpful. And so, so, but there are solutions to these things. And, um, know again with these sites if we can get people to share people's personal

stories anytime somebody gets ripped off uh you know these medical bill stories and a lot of people are talking about canceling insurance and everything to aggregate all those give people a platform to share that that information. Then at some point, once you sit down and you're like, yeah, it's just a law. This isn't just, oh, I'm angry because X is taking all of my information and they own it indefinitely and they can cancel the contract whenever they want. They give the data to the government. All that other stuff, right? It's in their agreement. It's not an isolated incident. It's literally every industry. And then you realize that the laws that are are written aren't there to protect you

they're written by the industries themselves and by lobbyists so it's not that you've got a voluntary contract with somebody it's that a bunch of industry players have gotten together and they've fought off congress to protect them and to force these these terms where you don't own anything and then and then it becomes well that's just a standard term these are just standard terms and conditions and then we're supposed to accept that these things in contracts it's boilerplate so it's all the stuff in like the back section and it's in all caps So then the condition is, oh, well, What is boilerplate? that's boilerplate. Well, it's just standard, right? It's in every contract.

It's like, okay, well, it's bullshit. I read what's in there and it's like, this is horrible. So the boilerplate is, I don't own my stuff. This is all this other stuff. And so I'm just supposed to accept it as boilerplate because you put it in all caps. Yeah, like they say, read the fine print. But I mean, most people, it's too hard to read. It's meant to not be read. So like most people are just going to breeze through it and just click. I agree. I mean, they don't know exactly what they did, what they accepted. They just accept and move on, get what they wanted or get their warranty here. that they needed or whatever. I mean, what have you, I mean, it's actually, it's,

it's pretty dangerous. And when you start thinking about it, it's like every terms of service that you've clicked yes to or signed or for anything in your life, what was actually in it? Yep. Well, again, and you know, I've bounced back and forth because I originally had on the site, you drop in the link and then it gives you a score and it tells you eight different dimensions, right? Here's, Here's how little you owe. This has a, you know, a ninety eight. You've given up ninety eight percent of your rights. And then here's here's the breakdown. So you have to read all the contract. It's tricky to do that because I was really going to have like, well, you can put in all your contracts and

you can see your overall score. I'm like, you know, no one's actually going to do that. You'd be better off just taking the big ones that affect most people. Like take your net, like the example that you use, take. you know, iTunes agreement on this whole idea of music. Okay, well, let's look at your iTunes agreement. Let's look at your Netflix agreement. Let's take the top twenty agreements that affect most people and then make it, visualize that, and that gets you ninety percent of the way there. But, you know, the biggest one for me, and it's actually on this site, so I put together, anybody who wants to go to HomeNothing.com, there's a medical wall where I have all,

every single package insert Big Pharma package insert. And sorted by the degree to which your consent is violated. And by these different criteria, the drug can cause dependency, it's lethal, mind-altering, experimental, mutagenic, whatever. These are things that no one ever reads. Because the package insert is like literally fine print folded. No one's ever read a package insert. If you've read a package insert, it's a miracle. And usually it's because, you know, you or a loved one probably remained dying because of one of these drugs. Yeah. Right. But this is this is a hundred percent of how all the big pharma works.

And so then I'm kind of like, so we have a situation where all the drugs you take, All of the liability is essentially then you bear a hundred percent of the risk and you don't even know about it because they've come up with their own way of saying, well, as long as it's in the package insert into this format. And then you can't even find out how much these drugs cost in advance because the hospitals pay. So we haven't even gotten into contracts yet. We're not even talking about a click wrap agreement or, hey, I signed this and didn't realize that I signed away my rights. We're talking about a situation where you've given away these things without signing it.

right out of the gates like healthcare is so bad we don't even need to look at the con the contracts are horrendous right if we looked at an insurance agreement or we looked at any of these other things they're absolutely horrible but you don't even need to look at those things to know what you're already subject to outside of whatever else you might sign and the funny thing about this is because i got my second company was in the healthcare space and so we would sell the corporations and actually some of our clients were um uh hospitals. And so so I swear that the most frequent background for the CEO of a hospital isn't somebody with medical experience,

or even somebody with business experience, their lawyers. And, and it's because the whole nature of operating a hospital is that you're like, you're sitting there figuring out how can we basically hide hide all of our information and shield ourselves from liability. So they will go out of their way to make sure that people don't know about medical malpractice, even though the second leading cause of death is injury from the medical system itself. The fact that that's true, but you're not hearing tens of thousands of stories every day is a function of lawyers. It's a function of what they put in place to do settlements. It's a whole insurance infrastructure. with non-disclosure agreements,

non-disparagement agreements and everything else. So the whole basis of the main person that's usually the CEO of a hospital is to use their legal experience to prevent transparency in any way, shape or form. So it'd be nice to kind of blow that up a little bit. It's one way you can find out that the mafia won because the government took what the mafia basically taught them is to look at the healthcare system, really. Absolutely. Your hospital CEOs, big pharma, their legal teams. I mean, the attorneys around the world, that's not good. It's not good at all. No, it's absolutely not.

Oh, we got somebody else here. The value optimizer. Hold on. Let me see what we got here. Hey, how are you? All right. Is that Aaron? Yes. Hey, how you doing? I'm a buddy of Dan O'Neill's. Oh, hey, how are you? We met once at a currency event down All right. in someplace South Jersey. I think I remember it. I think it was the workshop that I was doing, the CBDC workshop. Yeah. I think so. I think I remember. So how have you been? Yeah, pretty good. You? Busy, but not bad. Cool. What do we got here? Small group?

Yeah, it's just three of us. We've got you, me, and Zach. Nice. Yeah, I was talking to Dan and he said, you should get on with Aaron Day one oh, of these times. And I just I said, I got to keep remembering to check signal. And then I just thought, oh, let me go check. And boom, there was an invitation right at the bottom. So I get on. Yeah, I'm glad it worked out. Yeah, I didn't. This podcast is usually on Mondays and Thursdays, and I had to cancel the last minute yesterday. So I think a lot of people had no idea we were having it tonight. So I'm glad you could hop on. Yeah. Yeah, Dan and I get into some interesting conversations about stuff. Oh, I bet. I always have interesting conversations

with Dan. So, you know, I don't know if you guys were in the middle of something, but mind if I chime in? Sure. Go ahead. Cool. So, you know, with so much going on with the stablecoin stuff and, you know, it becomes you know, kind of obvious that, uh, the world economic forum group had another plan for our country and Trump has another plan to, you know, or whatever he's trying to do. And, you know, and the battle goes on between these two major forces. Right. Um, what do you think is going to play out here? Like, uh, we're going to end up with,

you know, multiple, um, sort of bank something to compete against the central bank or are we going to end up you know is the world economic forum going to win and get a central bank I don't think there are two different sides I don't think Trump is opposition to anything in fact what I've been saying is technocracy which is really what the wef is pushing it's also what Elon Musk and Peter Thiel are pushing and Trump is a vessel that's actually accelerated it by five years there's there's no There's no resistance. In fact, what we ended up getting out of this last election was technocracy without resistance. Where this ends up is a single global currency based on energy credits,

which is the definition of one of the foundational principles of technocracy is to replace the price-based system with energy credits, because then you have a captive system. And once you can regulate energy expenditure then you layer on top of that social credit systems this is exactly what Elon Musk is pushing he's actually saying it explicitly now he's saying money's going to be replaced it's going to be replaced by wattage so this is the direction it's moving and that's the direction Klaus Schwab's moving that's the direction Musk and teal and by extension JD Vance so Trump is not offering any alternative he's actually hyper accelerating what people think of as the WEF agenda,

but they've been fooled into believing that it's something else. That's essentially what's going on. It's been very frustrating for me because the people that were opposed to the WEF before the election think they've won and aren't even aware of what's going on. Yeah, well, I fit into that category because that's exactly why I'm calling in. I'm like, all right, what's going on? The WEF is basically just a public extension to the Bilderberg Group that was started. I think their first meeting was like two years before the WEF was formed. So like this has been in plan for

a long time since the early fifties with the Bilderbergs. And then of course, the wef was formed and getting consolidated publicly to the point where they are the now they are the true face like they're just out in the open now i mean you have the trilateral commission that uh orchestrates underneath the builder bird pretty much founded by david uh rockefeller one of one of the founders at least was david rockefeller club of rome is in is influenced into this council on foreign relations like it's just a number of different Just steak pits. It is. And it ends up being about five hundred people and they're all interconnected with these organizations. And you can see which, you know,

there there was a period of time where I could actually get AI to tell me who's been on the board of, you know, Club of Rome, Trilateral Commission, whatever. And there was the impression that there was some woman that was part of the Carnegie Foundation that has been on like three out of four of those boards. And people never heard of this person. So there's a lot of stuff that is going on, and it's kind of coordination behind the scenes. But the thing is, it's been pushed. And it's hard for people to accept this, but technocracy is a movement that started in the nineteen thirties and then it died because of a lot of infighting and some weird stuff that happened.

But it was revitalized by the Trilateral Commission in nineteen seventy two, which was Brzezinski and Rockefeller were the two main guys. And then what the Trilateral Commission did was they influenced the UN the following year in seventy three when they created this thing called the New International Economic Order, which is the basis for the UN Agenda twenty thirty and the seventeen sustainable development goals. There's actually like it's a direct line here. Patrick Wood has written all kinds of books and materials about this where he's analyzed the Trilateral Commission. In fact, when I was writing my book, The Final Countdown, I reached out to him.

Because he's been following them for four years and said, well, hey, do you happen to know who's currently on the Trilateral Commission? Because they don't report their information. He's like, sure. He's been keeping a private database for four years. He sent me a PDF with the full list of all four hundred people. And the Trilateral Commission to try is North America, Europe and Asia, which is really Japan. And he had the full list. And he's like, yeah, they have two, three year terms. And it's like, so, you know, Larry Fink is currently on there. Jamie Dimon used to be on there. They cycle on and off. They flip between these other things. And he wrote in one of his books,

like what the breakdown is. And it's about fifty percent, you know, corporate leaders and then some percentage from the media, some percentage from academia. He's broken the whole thing down. And it's like it's so it's a whole thing. this is why i put together technocracy atlas because so many people sit around saying well it's this group or it's that group or the other group it's like no it's not one particular group it's a bunch of it's networks of you know evolving although there are some stable players there but they are pushing towards they've been pushing towards this global governance model since before the forming of the un since you can go back to the league of nations you can go

back further further than that and it's actually happening now and um Look, I complain about Trump a lot. Trump is not the mastermind of any of this. Trump is just having his ego stroked by billionaires. And so whether he knows what he's doing or whether he knows what the outcome of this is, I don't know. But I've done several episodes on this. One of the guys really driving things from behind the scenes is Peter Thiel. And Peter Thiel has handpicked and groomed JD Vance from the very, very beginning. I don't know if you followed any of the history of this, but everything from, you know, allegedly meeting Vance met Thiel at Yale

at a Yale Law School event. And then Vance's first job was working for Peter Thiel. Then he gets a job. as the chief operating officer of a biotech company with no biotech experience on the basis of a recommendation by Thiel, where he apparently does no work and goes on a book tour. Then he ends up getting funding from Thiel to start his own investment firm. Then Thiel puts up fifteen million dollars for his US Senate campaign, where he completely flips all of his positions on all issues to be aligned with Trump. and then uh actually teal is the one who introduced jd vance to trump this is so so the actual concern here is that trump is trump isn't driving anything

there's no five d chess trump's on the way out right this is this is the last thing people should be worried about jd vance because jd vance is explicitly pushing a technocratic agenda and is literally a puppet that who is controlled by by Peter Thiel. And then this gets even deeper into this, because ideologically, there's another guy named curtis yarvin who i talk about a lot and this has been problematic because even because there are a lot of libertarians that are buying into this so this becomes a it's hard to explain because it's nuanced and then there are a lot of libertarians like oh yeah this guy's great but this guy jd vance he's come up with some things that i agree with or

that sound good on the surface until you understand what the motivations are so a lot of the trump policy has been things like um Yarvin came up with this thing called RAGE, Retire All Government Employees. So you look at a lot of the stuff that happened with Doge and you look at the idea of getting rid of the bureaucracy, which I'm for getting rid of the bureaucracy, but what they pushed and what Yarvin pushes explicitly is that democracy is a failed form of government. I don't know what happened there. Hold on, I had a call.

No, I had a call coming in. What? Oh, OK. Democracy is a failed form of governance, which we don't have a democracy, but this is the way you set it up and that monarchies or a dictator or a CEO style person in control is a better form of government and democracy. This is one of the things that Curtis Yarvin has been pushing ideologically. And he influenced Peter Thiel. He influenced Elon Musk. And so the problem with this is what's happened with Trump is they've, and he's also said a lot of things that again, that are true. He said that our institutions are failing, like media and universities and everything And so he calls that the cathedral. else.

And so he's been pushing for the idea that we should destroy these things. And you may look at that and say, well, hey, maybe that sounds like a good idea. These things are failing until you realize that it's just a glide path to implement technocracy. So the idea is to consolidate power in the executive branch and then transition that to an AI governance model and a technocratic system, which is exactly what Doge was all about, Doge was never about saving money. by the way. mean you know people have forgotten about this people forgot about the fact that doge the promise of doge was that it was going to wipe out the deficit the promise of doge was something completely

different what doge actually did was connected palantir to all federal government databases and now they're building a database of americans this is this is what actually happened this was a consequence of that that was the intention musk is a technocrat his grandfather was the head of the technocratic party he has explicitly stated he wants a technocracy on mars he stated he's for ubi he stated that currency will go away what's ubi universal basic income oh geez he said yeah well yeah i mean they're right it makes sense because he thinks everybody should have a robot too right so everybody should have a robot but now but what he said universal basic income it'll be universal super income

And and this is what he's pushing. In fact, now, you know, I'm not I'm on X. This is like he's explicitly stating. So so Musk is saying the same things Klaus Schwab was saying. But because it's Elon Musk saying it, people aren't resisting it. People are sitting there saying, oh, well, the future sounds great. We're all going to get universal basic income. And isn't this going to be a wonderful system? And it's the same thing that Klaus Schwab And ideologically, was pushing. you had this Yuval Noah Harari guy on the left. who is who Klaus Schwab and others would put out there. You have Curtis Yarbon, who's the same kind of pseudo intellectual guy behind the scenes.

They're both pushing technocracy. So you have people that think that on the one hand, there's this big clash and this big battle between the globalists and however it is they try to portray Trump. And in reality, We're getting technocracy either way. And it's just a matter of whether you want the Elon Musk brand of it or the Bill Gates brand of it. And ideologically, to me, it's the end of free will. That's actually how I frame it, because once your money is programmable and what decisions you can make about your life are predetermined by a social credit system designed from the top down by a system that doesn't even value individual rights, let alone necessarily humanity itself,

which is another aspect of kind of like the transhuman thing. But once you get into that realm, so this is where we are. So how it's going to play out right now, how it's going to play out is we're going to get technocracy. There's without exiting the system, without enough people exiting the system and building parallel systems, we're going to get technocracy either way. That's how I think, that's where we're at. And unfortunately, we're getting technocracy faster under Trump. give you an example i see a lot of people that say oh digital id making fun of people in the uk oh look at this guy you know starmer they're going to implement digital ids mandatory by we

just passed real id after years of fighting real id it gets passed in the first ninety hundred and twenty days of trump's administration it's digital already in twelve states the plan is to have real id be digital for the entire country in all fifty states by twenty twenty seven So we're sitting here making fun of the UK and something they might do by twenty Oh, twenty nine. look at how he just went against the will of the people. And then we passively accepted the exact same thing. I've talked to people that have actually. It's actually worse than that, if you think about it, because what they did is they convinced everybody to pay for it as if it was a benefit. Exactly. So think about that.

Yeah. So that's happened. And they made it a private company, so now you can't even do a FOIA request or an OPA request. Yep. How's that? It's actually worse. Yep. Yep. It's worse. So that's happened under Trump. AI surveillance has been ramped up. When you get into looking at the national AI strategy, operation stargate and this database of americans which trump pushed its executive order by trump literally connecting palantir to all of these things well we would have resisted this before the election right this would have been something oh my god you know bill gates wef they're trying to put in these things where there's there's no opposition to this where's where are the people writing

about palantir and i've done several podcasts on this but when you dig into palantir is not even just military intelligence. They have a contract in the UK. They're building a database for the NHS of all of the health data for everybody in the UK. So they're big into healthcare. They're even involved in school surveillance for kids in public schools. It's actually massive. And there's no protesting it. So this is the problem that we have. The problem that we have is we only have technocracy on the table and people don't even know what it is. Yeah, you know, when you look at Elon Musk, you know, obviously you're dealing with somebody who is willing to physically connect himself

to, you know, a computer. You know, clearly he's okay with the merger between humans and computers. No question about that. And like you said, the whole thing with transhumanism, and I've been calling that out for, you know, for five years. saying that was the whole reason they started the transgender thing was to get people used to seeing people walk around that aren't human, just a stepping stone to transhumanism. Yep. I think that's absolutely. They hijacked politics in the activist class, hijacked the gay rights movement, just like every civil rights movement to

coax it into a political activity. Yeah, and when you think about it, too, if you have people walking around that are transhuman, you've got one more problem. You have the United States Constitution that says that you have human rights because you were born of God. So now you've got to get rid of the Constitution. Yep. And they're actively working on that. There's a plan for kind of an international AI framework. And when you read the AI framework, humans are not necessarily primary. People are already having conversations about what is the level at which AI achieves consciousness? And when it achieves that, does it get rights? When does it get rights? And this is already being discussed and

already being planned. And so the problem is, again, There's no opposition to this. There's, and I don't, I don't even know. I'll tell you the most disappointing thing for me is, and my life has been involved in the medical freedom movement since like the mid, like, like, two thousand five, two thousand six, and everything else. The Baja has been completely hijacked. So on the one hand, It's like people are celebrating, well, they're making these chipping away on you know, these things on COVID. In the meantime, RFK is pushing wearables. He's pushing AI. He's meeting with, like, if you actually see what's going on with AI and the influence of tech, that has nothing to do with medical freedom.

The government pushing wearables and trackable devices and implementing this stuff is anti-medical. It's much more anti-medical freedom than even just a single vaccine. And Maha, I don't even want to confuse the terms, medical freedom community has historically been the best activists that we have because these are people that are, they're not even necessarily starting out These are people that have been harmed and ideologically. are very fundamentally passionate about what they're doing. And so RFKs like provided this great shield for the technocrats. And so those activists who are some of our best aren't even realizing that they're helping to usher in complete medical theory.

So I did an episode on that. And it's not, you know, it's not popular. I'm in a lot of circles where I'm dealing with a lot of these people. A lot of these people are now even in government. I'm kind of like, what are you guys doing? You understand the threat of they're going to start implementing AI with Medicare and Medicaid next year. And you could take the argument that, yeah, you want to make these things more efficient. I would argue we shouldn't have these things. All their Ponzi schemes are Great, but when you look at what's going on with AI in healthcare, somebody asked in the comments, what are your thoughts on this AI stuff? It kind of relates to that. AI is great.

It's like technology can either be really empowering or it can be something that just imprisons you. And it depends on whether you're actively using it and which form of it you're using, right? If you're using a CBDC, or a government regulated stable coin, that is not a pro-freedom thing. If you're using a decentralized privacy coin, then that's an improvement. If you're using a state sanctioned regulated AI and you're using it passively, assuming that the information that comes out of it is accurate, you're probably going to be in a bad place. If you're using open source models and things like what Mike Adams has created, that he's given away for free, his Bright U or Brightion AI,

I don't even know what he's calling it now, Bright U AI, where you can download it on your computer, it's open source, it's trained on completely different data, then AI can be great. So unfortunately, most of the implementations of this and just, I mean, I come from a time where I used to think like in the eighties and nineties, like, like tech tech was kind of libertarian meaning. I remember actually thinking Bill Gates I mean, was libertarian meaning for a while, like back in the seventies, kind of eighties vibe. And then, and then something happened and it went from being libertarian ish to, to actually being the, the surveillance state. And did you ever see the movie?

Um, uh, inside the brain of Bill Gates or something like that. It was a Netflix original. Oh God. Yeah. The propaganda thing. Well, so when I saw it, it was just before COVID hit and, um, I said, okay, this is interesting. He wants to develop, his father was into vaccines, right? And his father wanted to cure malaria. That was his father's dream. And his father never achieved it. So Bill Gates decided that one of his missions in life was going to be to cure malaria to see his father's lifelong dream come true. And so I followed that rabbit hole after

watching that movie to find out that Bill Gates did, in fact, administer a vaccine to a tribe in Africa. And the tribe went on to the side effects of the vaccine was that they ended up getting polio. And many of the people in the tribe got sterilized because the polio sterilized them. And so that's where Bill Gates got this reputation for sterilizing people with his vaccine. It was a side effect of the vaccine that he gave them. And that got scrubbed from the internet, that whole thing.

amazing and so i thought to myself okay so that was one thing that he wanted to do and then um then i started to see with crisper how they were actually um figured out how they could eliminate the very mosquito that carried the malaria vaccine they could literally wipe it off the face of the earth by giving it a genetic mutation and within probably like a couple of days, I don't know, the mosquito would be extinct and that would wipe out malaria. But they were like, well, if we do that and we get rid of this mosquito, what's that going to do to the ecosystem? You know, what animal or what bird or what, you know, lives off of or is affected by this

mosquito? How do we know what that's going to do? So they decided not to do it theoretically. But I think somebody let the mosquitoes go anyway, from what I understand. So they never really had to vaccinate anybody. All they had to do was get rid of the mosquitoes that carried it. But then he started this thing where he wanted to do. He's a big proponent of the fifteen minute cities because in his head he can put a nano printer in the middle of every fifteen minute city. And then if you can't leave your city and there's a virus that breaks out in the city, he can lock everybody in the city, print the vaccine on this nanoparticle

printer, and then inject everybody in the city. And he calls those people, they're almost like firemen. but they're, you know, vaccine firemen. You know, they show up and shoot everybody up with the cure real fast to contain the virus. And, you know, he thinks this is just amazing. Like, this is going to be so cool. Yeah, I mean, you know, so, I mean, assuming that's the actual story, I mean, this is the consequence of, I mean, there's a lot of hubris here and a lot of, not understanding complex systems and the effects of how one thing might affect the other. And so he could have the purest of intentions.

And that's usually where we get into trouble when, always when we get in trouble, somebody with pure intentions, but ends up using oversized influence to shape global policy. And then it turns out this is how you end up getting famines and, you know, mass near mass extinction events. Right. And so it could be well-intentioned and you still have a bad outcome. This is the problem with technocracy is that the assumption is that we're not smart enough to make decisions for ourselves. Only the engineers and scientists can do this. And this has to be picked from the top down. And where this gets confused in the libertarian side is that they're kind of saying, well, it's a meritocracy.

So it's a weird flavor. This Curtis Yarvin, this whole Yarvin-Musk transhumanist side of it is very weird because it's not pro-liberty. It ends up being positioned as being pro-meritocracy, but you can have a meritocracy that is authoritarian and not libertarian. In fact, that's what these systems are. And so it's really hard to, again, it's another thing that requires a lot of nuance, but people should be very worried about JD Vance. They should be very worried about Peter Thiel and Elon Musk. And you can say, well, he's the richest guy. I'm not even saying I, the fact that, you know, I'm used his stuff. I, I, I'm not, I don't care how much money the guy has.

I'm not like, there's no aspect of that. It's the ideological part of this. And then once you see what he's doing, in terms of trying to manipulate public opinion into moving towards, well, we're going to have AI governance and no one's going to have to work. You only work if you want to work and it's universal super income. I mean, this is now becoming mainstream to the point you have Michael Dell giving everyone under ten years old in America money, which is kind of training for UBI. you have Coinbase, the crypto exchange, giving certain people in New York or New York City. You know what's going to happen one day? When I hear that about you, I mean, look,

I'm happy to hear that he's doing that, right? But there was a point in history where... Are you familiar with Levittown, PA? With what? Levittown? Levittown, Pennsylvania. No, I mean... so levittown pennsylvania is a as a development in p a uh... built by andrew levitt and uh... andrew levitt was this brainchild though you know he decided he was going to build these levittowns all over the country and at that point in history uh you had to be you if you were black you couldn't buy a house in a levittown it was against um the the lenders wouldn't give you a loan because your credit score wasn't theoretically black people weren't

good with their credit so you didn't qualify for the loan and so no black people were allowed to buy they say that this created generational wealth that you know the black people were denied and therefore that where most of the uh... uh... the the idea of giving them back money rep uh... reparations comes from and uh... and you know and i can see because of my the business i'm in that you know this is a real thing i mean it it really happened there's so many houses built all over the country it's amazing um and now the irony is that mostly black people live in those towns but the the uh the bottom line is when you start to give a whole

bunch of people money like that and now all of a sudden you may actually create generational wealth for these people that got that money and anybody who didn't get it is going to say that they need reparations to catch up yep yep It's a, there's a theological, uh, element to all of this, like the technocracy, Elon, Bill Gates, even the reparations and the Levittown and the irony of that. Like whenever you take the apple, you think that you're getting all this freedom, this Liberty being, you have all this knowledge now, this truth, but in reality, you've just enslaved yourself. You've just slayed yourself to your desire. And where do you go from there?

because they thought that he was superior in some capacity. Yeah, it's pretty wild. The only thing you can hope is that when you look at the fight that Elon took up, he clearly saw that things were going in a bad direction when he bought Twitter. Now, At that point, he did save us from a pretty bad existence or he slowed things down. All right. He took control over it. Now he's steering it in his direction. And you got to kind of hope that he's the, you know, from Marvel Comics, that he's the the rich. What's the guy's stark version of,

you know, he's explicitly. But my last podcast was about this. I had technical issues. I've got a whole like sixty slide presentation. He's definitively not. a white knight he's definitively not a hero he is explicitly a technocrat he did not say free speech in fact the most viral tweet i have is is i took the terms of service that the update when on x he has the right to take all of the data train his ai with it he can kick you off for any reason he can give your data to the government including dms when you actually read the contract He actually talked about how AI should be open source. He was all worried about it, and this is why he funded OpenAI. And it turns out when he sued Sam

Altman and Discovery came out, he was trying to take OpenAI for Tesla. He was trying to take it. He's been lying. He's he is explicitly lying as demonstrated in court documents. He didn't buy X to save free speech. I played a video clip of it. In fact, you know what? I may. Let me see if I have it on on here. See if I have one of the saved. one of the safe clips because people have to understand. Here we go. I'm going to play this real quick. I mean, we don't even have a map that's as Indeed. good as WeChat in China. In China, you can live on WeChat, basically. It's like, Yeah, everyone's like, you live on WeChat, you do payments, you do everything. It's like, yeah, it's great.

WeChat's kick ass. And we don't have anything like WeChat outside of China. So I was like, how about if we just copy WeChat? my idea would be like, Hey, copy them. Buy Twitter, copies WeChat. Yeah, pretty much. I guess. He explicitly said it. Yeah. So there's no conspiracy theory here. He did not buy Twitter to say free speech. WeChat is essentially the everything app that's tied to social credit systems in China. You just saw him say the reason that he bought it is buy Twitter, make it WeChat. He's building the social credit system payment system platform. in the United States, but not just for the United States.

And he's using it to feed data to his AI. He saved nothing. And in fact, what people have is the illusion of free speech. This is why this is such a difficult situation, because I mentioned we have technocracy without resistance. So many people, I've seen these posters, Tulsi Gabbard, all these other people, they're white knights. They're not white knights, they're accelerating technocracy. Ideologically, we know where he stands. Which I had my presentation. I'm not making any of this up. Just like that video clip, I've got tweets. He's for UBI. He is for energy credits. He is for all of these things explicitly. This is not Tony Stark. This is the face of technocracy with no

resistance. That's what's going on. So we have to stop the white knight. RFK Jr. is not a white knight. Donald Trump's not a white knight. We have to stop giving our agency to any of these people. And we've been wrong and people don't even know it. So he didn't say free speech. By the way, freedom of speech. I did. I think I did a podcast on this. What about freedom of reach? We don't have freedom of speech. If you talk about certain topics, remember the H-B issue came up and he didn't like. The fact that people were challenging the H-B issues. So he just canceled five thousand accounts and then they changed the terms of service to say that he can cancel anyone for any reason.

How is that freedom of speech? It's not even freedom. I mean, so so now one guy gets to determine what is and what is not free speech. And I will tell you. If you're anti-technocracy, if you're anti a lot of the things that he is, those things get weighted. Somebody actually leaked something about what the algorithm is. One of the things that was in this new agreement, updated terms of service, is if you try to reverse engineer and figure out what censorship model they might be deploying, they can remove you from the terms of service. You're not even allowed to try to detect what mechanisms that they're using as part of the terms of service. So what I highly recommend is anybody who

thinks Elon Musk is a white knight, read any of the agreements for any of his products and services and read any of the actual legal any of the litigation that he's been in and view what his comments are under oath versus what his comments are that he states online. He is not. a white knight that is that is over with and that's the scary part remember he had the whole break with trump and then he was going to form america's party people forget about this he announced well we need it we need a third party and he brought in curtis yarvin to consult so we know where he's at ideologically and the thing about this is if you believe in free will then you're going to have a hard time

with with his approach, his approach. In fact, there's there's a like I've got to read them. I did a summary of it. There's a series of like nine or ten science fiction books that he kind of models what he thinks the future is going to be like. And I kind of researched and dug into like like his endgame for this is, you know, it ends up being like that movie WALL-E where everybody's like hovering around in space on a, you know, levitating around on a on a on a chair stuffing their face with an iPad in front of them. That's like his, that's his hedonistic end state for, for humanity. So I remember that movie because they're all hovering around in a ship around the

earth, waiting for the earth to be safe to go back down to, but they don't realize that it's already safe, but they're not letting them back down. Yep. So we know what he thinks, but people don't want to hear it. People want to believe. I mean, how many times do we have to get rugged in a row by belief in a white knight? Like it's never panned out, right? It hasn't panned out yet. And then it keeps on getting worse, right? Trust the plan and everything else. Like none of it's come to fruition, but we're running out of time. And the degree to which the surveillance state has been accelerating under Trump It's worse than I was predicting. I mean, you were in the workshop that I did.

And I was saying, well, you know, I'm worried about CBDCs and everything else. What they did with the Genius Act was a backdoor CBDC that accelerated the adoption of digital programmable money that's controlled by government far faster than explicitly launching a CBDC. And they did it without any opposition. People are cheering it on as being pro-crypto and they're pro-America and pro-innovation. And it's none of those things. Yeah, I mean, that's the thing that's upsetting. And I guess the most about this stuff is that everything is just theater. And they push it this direction until they get you to the breaking point where you're ready to snap back the other way.

And then you'll let them do whatever they want in the other direction, right? Yeah. I mean, Curtis Yarvin says, yeah, Yeah. we don't like the cathedral. We don't like, you know, we don't like media. I don't like media either. But then what are they building? So we have the illusion that we have free speech. So we have X and what they can do algorithmically. Musk's power and ability to shape, inform public perception and to tilt a generally fifty-fifty society, to tilt things one way or the other, he has more control than probably anyone has ever had at any point in time with any consolidation of media. And he does it on explicit points. If he feels strongly about a particular issue,

he clearly weighs in on politics in the US and abroad, because you have to understand this is global. People will sit here and they'll make AI as an example, like a domestic patriotic national defense issue. And they'll say, Trump will put out a policy. We need to lead in AI. And then he'll have a press conference with Larry Ellison and Sam Altman. And they talk about how they're investing five hundred billion dollars in their accounts. It's like, do you guys realize how many contracts Oracle has overseas? Do you realize what kind of business dealings Larry Ellison has in China? What business dealings Sam Altman has in Palantir? China? You think Palantir is a US only company?

And so what they do is they try to get the average voter to say, yeah, we've got to protect ourselves from China. So I'm going to hook up my exercise bike to the data center so that we can win the AI war. And all they're doing is subsidizing global technocratic organizations to march forward towards technocracy. when you look at the whole thing about You know, Twitter, I mean, not Twitter, TikTok, where they tried to make TikTok out to be bad. Well, it was bad because they couldn't control it. Not because it was bad. So I think they use the the term anti-Semitism. And I think. Yeah. Oh, yeah. Larry Elson is one of the largest donors

to the Israeli Defense Force and he's friends with Benjamin. I don't want to go down that angle, but it's explicitly true where his alliances are on that front. And so now we're supposed to believe that China is the bad guy. We're supposed to believe that these other people are the bad guys. In reality, all that's happening is technocracy is moving forward. This is the brilliance of what the Trilateral Commission put together, because what the Trilateral Commission said is, we're going to move towards a global And the way that they did it was technocracy. by, in the US, for instance, they didn't, they would influence politics at the very highest level, but often cabinet positions.

So Nixon's administration had only one person that wasn't a member of the Trilateral Commission. Every administration since, and critically, the Commerce Secretary, who's responsible for negotiating trade has been a Trilateral Commission member. deals, member well you do that for fifty years and you coordinate that in europe and north america and everything else then all of a sudden what you've done is you have moved towards a global economic system where you've empowered global corporations and you've you've eliminated sovereignty this is this has been going on for fifty years and what i like to say about uh stable coins and now the clarity act tokenizing everything else

they've already done legally We already own nothing legally. They've done this through changes in the law and contracts and click wrap agreements. We already own nothing. People just don't realize it. Once you tokenize it and you give the control over how those tokens can be can move, can be programmed and censored, once you give those to central agencies, then that makes the. We will truly on nothing happen to the click of a mouse button as opposed to a more arduous process. And that's the stage that we're at right now. No one knows they've given away their rights legally. People still think they have constitutional protections and so forth, which is a joke. We don't.

We haven't for a long time. Yeah, I mean, the way they stepped all over the Constitution during COVID made it obvious that it was, you know, a joke. Yeah, it's a joke. I mean, and who wins these things? And by the time you win these things, they find out other subtle ways, kind of like you mentioned with Real ID and everything else. Then they find out ways of skirting the law by using private organizations as opposed to government entities. Now you can't do employer requests. And now you have to go through this whole situation where who can fight this because of how expensive the legal process has become. I'm going to do an analysis at some point of how much the average lawsuit

costs in terms of legal defense, because there's a certain degree of Unless a problem is so large in economic value, people can't afford to fight it. And even if it is large in economic value, people can't afford to buy it. The process itself is inherently not just. And I have been thinking about trying to figure out, well, okay, how much did legal fees cost? How much How long was a typical lawsuit? How long was a trial? How much did this cost? How much does this cost as a percentage of, you know, the actual, you know, inflation adjusted money at the time. And I think that, you know, when you come to all of these conclusions, you're going to find that we are,

we're already pretty much a technocracy. So, so, so there isn't a battle, like I said, there's a, there's the, there's the theater battle. So the China thing is fascinating to me. And, I've talked about this. I don't know if I did a dedicated. I might have done one on China, but I had Mike Adams on to talk about this. And I wasn't even aware of this. Two episodes ago, I touched on this. China's leading the United States in fifty seven out of sixty four technology categories. We have this. We are so insulated and so isolated from what's going on in the rest of the world. We're like holding on to a post-World War II viewpoint of our position in the world and wouldn't even realize the world has

passed us by. China's winning in robotics, quantum computing. They're going to catch up on AI probably They're maybe like ninety days behind now. next year. And like we have this viewpoint of it's a bunch of dirt, poor people that are eating rice, everything on your plate. And in reality, they hate us. And I got to take this call. I'll be back. All right. I was going to say, in leapfrogging us, they're not leapfrogging us because communism is better. They have corporations. They have as much, quote, capitalism as we have here when you actually look at how things are structured. They have corporations in China. They have investments in China.

We've moved more towards communism. They've moved more towards capitalism, but we're both kind of in the same spot at this point and they've leapfrogged us in other, other areas, but they're not the enemy. The technocrats are the ones in control. So we have all these manufactured divisions and I don't know how we're gonna, you know, again, the, the, we have twenty, twenty-six and hopefully technocracy Atlas will help open some people's eyes in some regards, but, but again, it almost doesn't matter unless people start exiting the system. that's that's a tough one and then the toughest part of it is that people think they have something to lose yeah that's

the thing but yeah everybody right now they have most people think that they have everything to lose by staying within the system though it's hard it's a it's a big pill to swallow really It is. It's tough. But once you actually see it, It's tough. you can't unsee it. So it's like so, you know, I mean, we all get to this point. We've all gotten to the point where we're here now talking about this because we've had some experience with it. We have the advantage of having the experience before other people. But we all everybody went through the experience that got to a place like this. But then it's kind of like, all right, we don't have a lot of time for people to wake up.

And and it's it's really challenging. But I do think, I mean, there's, there is possibility, there's still hope, but what I'm going to do, I have this, the technocracy Atlas, there's a, like this DEF CON five system where I, where I try to put together a rating of basically how screwed are we on the tech knock technocracy index. So it's, so it's, it looks at this from the standpoint of how far has digital ID rolled out globally. And then I do it in the United I do it also in the United States, States. like, you know, states, right. Where are we with CBDCs or backdoor CBDCs? Where are we with the tokenization of other assets? Where are we with social credit systems?

Where are we with AI surveillance? Because you have to measure yourself against what's actually going on with your real ideological competition. Oftentimes, what I find is people will say, well, hey, more people are using privacy coins. more okay there are more people using privacy coins but in relation to the growth of technocracy we're losing ground we're not gaining ground you have to look at it from the standpoint so when i put together the sovereignty score like so i live in new hampshire and there are a lot of people like oh yeah new hampshire you know we're the freest place on earth because the free state project and everything else you know i'm not part

of the free state project i'm like Like, you know, it's like saying you're the most free of the British colonies, right? If your overall sovereignty score globally is going down, the fact that you're relatively better than others isn't really helpful, doesn't matter. And so as I've been working on these sites and working on ways of trying to figure out how to communicate this, I think I'm gonna get to the point where I'm gonna be able to give people tools where they can measure their own sovereignty, measure it against what's going on globally, and then, see what things, actions that they can take to improve And I was, their sovereignty. I'm going to be speaking at a parallel

solutions conference in Portugal. I don't know. I had Sterling Lujan on here a couple of times, and I don't know if you know, He's I really, I really liked Sterling. know him. He's I think he's one of the most knowledgeable people in the world about network stage, which I know some people take issue with network states, but, but he actually. because some of them have actually become technocracy related in their own right. But he's taken very much a different approach that one of the hallmarks of network states is you have to be able to exit. He's put together some really intelligent frameworks and everything else. And so I was on a X space with him last week or the week before.

And so when you think about, there are people that are in different situations. Like I say to a lot of people, like if you live in New York City, I know people that think they're going to fight and win politically. I know people in New York that will say, oh, well, we have the Constitution. And if we can just get people to vote, that is not a viable outlook. So you can move, right? You can move out of New York. You can move from your circumstance somewhere better. But even if you don't do that. I wanna put together the whole suite of tools. Like as an example, like on the healthcare front, form a medical trust. Everybody, if you have assets, you should form a medical trust.

Or if you have assets that are identifiable, you should form a medical trust. You should qualify that. Why? Because whatever it might cost you, do it yourself on LegalZoom, a hundred bucks, right? If you have enough assets to protect, you can at least spend a couple hundred You don't have to hire a lawyer. bucks. You can actually do it yourself. But that's one thing you can do. But people don't know things like, even if you're doing something like a trust, you don't have to, just because you live in a state, let's say you live in Ohio or New Jersey, you can form a trust in a different state. You can take advantage. So you can shop jurisdictions. so most people think that where they are

they're stuck by playing and even the legal structure so even if you think you can't move for whatever reason there's some barriers that you think you can't move i would like to say though also you usually don't have those barriers if you really think about it like you're not you can leave your job like at the end of the day it's only because you think your options are this limited but in reality There are a lot of options. It's just you're constrained by your own thinking. But let's say just to get somebody to start, people can start by doing small things without having to completely uproot their life. They can start taking steps to take their And then at some point when you have

sovereignty back. that aha moment, when you realize that, oh, this thing that I think is tyrannical or whatever is not an isolated event. It's systemic. Then once you reach that point, then you kind of realize, all right, I'm done with this old system. What are we going to build in it? And it's a switch. It's a, it is a, it's a, it's kind of a binary thing. And so once we get people there, then you won't look back because you know, you know, again, you're like, all right, I've been, you have to admit that you've been lied to everything that we've been told, everything that we, particularly in the U S we have been sold so much propaganda. I mean, I played that clip from,

I don't know if you saw this, that this episode, it was one of my favorite clips from, from the show newsroom. I don't know if you saw that one. It's a, let me see if I have it on here. I don't know if I have it on If I had it as a separate clip, here. but I, you know, it was two episodes ago when I did the own nothing thing and we don't have it on here. It's basically from two thousand and twelve and This character played by Jeff Daniels. I mean, it's an Aaron Sorkin thing he did in West Wing. So it's like not, you know,

I wish our ideological views had, we had that kind of ability to articulate our views and get that into the media. But nevertheless, this guy's a famous newscaster. He's asked what makes America the greatest country in the world. And he gives this rant where he's like, we're not. He lays out the stats. And this went viral in twenty twelve. And at some point I'm like, hey, oh, you know, here I have it. You mind if I play this? The next question. Hi, my name is Jenny. Go ahead. I'm a sophomore. And this is for all three of you. Can you say in one sentence or less what you know what I mean? Can you say why America is the greatest country in the world? Diversity and opportunity.

Lewis? Freedom and freedom. So let's keep it that way. Well, the New York Jets. No, I'm going to hold you to an answer on that. What makes America the greatest country in the world? Well, Lewis and Sharon said it. Diversity and opportunity and freedom and freedom. I'm not letting you go back to the airport without answering the question.

Well, our Constitution is a masterpiece. James Madison was a genius. The Declaration of Independence is for me the single greatest piece of American writing. You don't look satisfied. One's a set of laws and the other's a declaration of war. I want a human moment from you. What about the people? Why is America... Not the greatest country in the world, That's my answer. Professor. You're saying... Yes. Let's talk about... Fine. Sharon, the NEA is a loser. Yeah, it accounts for a penny out of our paycheck, but he gets to hit you with it anytime he wants. It doesn't cost money. It costs votes. It costs airtime and column inches.

You know why people don't like liberals? Because they lose. If liberals are so fucking smart, how come they lose so goddamn always? Hey. And with a straight face, you're going to tell students that America is so star-spangled awesome that we're the only ones in the world who have freedom? Canada has freedom. Japan has freedom. The UK, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, Australia, Belgium has freedom. So, two hundred and seven sovereign states in like a hundred and eighty of them have the world, All right. freedom. And yeah, you, uh, sorority girl, just in case you accidentally wander into a voting booth one day, there's some things you should know. And one of them is...

There is absolutely no evidence to support the statement that we're the greatest country in the world. We're seventh in literacy, twenty-seventh in math, twenty-second in science, forty-ninth in life expectancy, a hundred and seventy-eighth in infant mortality, third in median household income, number four in labor force, and number four in exports. We lead the world in only three categories. Number of incarcerated citizens per capita, number of adults who believe angels are real, and defense spending, where we spend more than the next twenty-six countries combined, twenty-five of whom are allies. Now none of this is the fault of a twenty-year-old college student,

but you nonetheless are, without a doubt, a member of the worst period, generation, period, ever, period. So when you ask what makes us the greatest country in the world, I don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Yosemite? Sure used to be. We stood up for what was right. We fought for moral reasons. We passed laws, struck down laws for moral reasons. We waged wars on poverty, not poor people. We sacrificed. We cared about our neighbors. We put our money where our mouths were, and we never beat our chest. We built great big things,

made ungodly technological advances, explored the universe, cured diseases, and we cultivated the world's greatest artists and the world's greatest economy. We reached for the stars. Acted like men. We aspired to intelligence. We didn't belittle it. It didn't make us feel inferior. We didn't identify ourselves by who we voted for in the last election. And we didn't scare so easy. We were able to be all these things and do all these things because we were informed. By great men. Men who were revered.

First step in solving any problem is recognizing there is one. America is not the greatest country in the world anymore. Enough. That kind of sums it up. It sums it up, and the thing is, I remember that clip when it came out, and then I looked it up, and it's like, we've actually gotten worse on every single one of the statistics that he mentioned. And then some. And so then, you know, again, you compare this to China and everything else. We have a problem, which is that we have been propagandized. We're not admitting where we are. In order to change, you have to admit your current circumstances. And we have actually,

we may be number one in propaganda. I mean, I say that to people like, oh, well, you know, you haven't been to Canada or whatever. We delusionally think we have the best health care. It's the we're leading in innovation we're not i mean it's it's our opinion and knowledge about ourselves relative to the to the rest of the world is that delta is probably bigger than anywhere so but again you know to your point right the problem with all of this is it's hard to admit these things and often you have to hit rock bottom before you admit a problem this is actually usually when people have some kind of transformational events often often happens probably more

often than not when they when they do hit rock bottom we're like hitting rock bottom what's different about technocracy is that it's it's global in scale and it doesn't offer and it doesn't allow the coexistence of other alternatives the un agenda wf agenda Musk agenda, whatever you want to call it, it's a, they have a, you know, no one left behind, but, you know, it's all inclusive. But what that means is you can't opt out. That's not a, it's not a good thing. It's an ideological behemoth that doesn't coexist. And that's the problem. So, again, you know, it's hard to break this news to people. People don't, or they won't believe it, but

But I find there are a lot of people that have come to this realization. But then the issue is then what do you do about it? Because being demoralizing is not adequate. Just telling people things are bad. People have to realize that they have agency. You have free will. You can exercise it. And you can exercise the little parallel systems. I think that you just landed on the solution, though. And it's the thing that I find myself most challenged with is, okay, if I want to get involved in parallel solutions, which one is it that you take?

You could spend so much time and energy going down rabbit holes, investing in the wrong parallel solution, only to find out that your resistance was futile. It's kind of like being a doomsday prepper and you got your basement full of food that goes bad before doomsday comes. A doomsday prepper moving to North Carolina because you think you're going to be safe there and then it gets wiped out. I hear you. That's why I'm of the mentality of agorist brand right now. Agorism is going outside of the system, of course. But lately, I've been thinking, why not play within the system while you're working to build parallel systems

for yourself and hopefully for your community and spreading that and embracing it? But why not use the system for what it is while... building something to exit the system. I mean, that's one tool that people can use. Another tool is to your point, Aaron, like people can move and people can move state to state just with making a trust. And they don't necessarily have to leave with their feet at the moment. But like nomadcapitalist.com has it's an Andrew Henderson and like it's implorable to like check it out because that's giving you options to explore ways of leaving

this country if you so need to without necessarily leaving to give yourself another solution just in case i mean you can get a dual you can get a second passport you can get a residency and you don't even have to leave your couch so now you're gonna have to have like certain tangible assets of course but you can you can have that you can there's there's an ability to be able to figure out a solution for a uh back pocket, just to have something in your back pocket just in case. Yeah, I think that where I've kind of landed on this is that we have to build

enough people to exit technocracy to stop technocracy. So the problem with it is that that There's a certain point because I've been to everything where people have multiple passports and everywhere else. There's nowhere to hide from a surveillance system. You can't hide. So so, you know, there are a lot of people like, well, maybe I'll be able to, you know, have a cabin in the woods or whatever. I encourage people to study technocracy. This is why I do the technocracy roundtable. with Patrick Wood and Courtney Turner. Patrick Wood has done forty years worth of work on this free articles, technocracy dot news. Because you have to understand what we're dealing with is ideological in nature,

and if you don't understand, for instance, that these are people and you know what, to your point about Bill Gates, it could be well intentioned, right? There are a lot of people that have had that. Oftentimes these things start out with good intentions. But you then, the more you dig into it, what you find, and I don't care what people's spiritual but if you do believe in God or beliefs are, any kind of a higher power, that is not what technocracy believes. It is fundamentally materialistic. Curtis Yarvin on the right, Curtis Yarvin on the right and Yuval Noah Harari on the left, they're both atheists. So when I when I say that free

will is at stake, you have to understand that these are people that don't believe in free will. Harari has stated explicitly the era of free will is over. So if people understood that, see, Musk will present presented Doge and a lot of people present technocracy as being efficiency and they try to make it look like it's just, well, we're using technology to make things more efficient. But that isn't what it is. There's a deeper, more fundamental ideological component to it. And it is fundamentally anti-free will. And so people don't know that. So if you don't know that, you might say, hey, this guy's successful. It looks like he's just trying to reduce

his expertise in technology to make things more efficient. When you dig in and understand what it actually means and what, I would argue, replace bureaucracy with nothing. Replacing bureaucracy with a centralized AI may less people in government but it does not involve it actually increases the control of the state and it diminishes your free will yeah how about how about a dow like a dow based system where you vote obviously on the blockchain for a king with one decree and that once they use that one decree they're gone and it starts over again how would that work could that work I have no idea. I don't know why we would want to

invest, give any individual that much power under any set of circumstances. I mean, the good thing about having a king is that you can have one person you can blame for the problem, whereas in the system we have now, they all point the finger at each other. Well, yeah, and it gives us an ability to not have any personal responsibility. Right. i think like if we were you to utilize a system where we kind of vote for that king and they have like one term where they have that one decree like if they get it wrong like the people can still hold them accountable and the next person voted could potentially hold them accountable or it could backfire who knows so trade-offs and everything that's

how i look at it there's always a trade-off So I was asking chat the other day about, you know, decisions that humans make and, um, which decisions, you know, are, you know, what, you know, what could it tell me about those decisions? Like, uh, do humans make good decisions? Do they make decisions that are best for them? And basically it said that humans tend to make decisions that are good for the moment, but not good for them overall. And, um, that you know it feels that it you know uh we're too short-term oriented so well you know and this gets into the question of what is the purpose of existence is the purpose of existence is

it is it material material wealth or is the is the point for us to build our consciousness by making bad decisions and learning from this To me, I think it's important that we have agency to make decisions, even if they're the wrong decisions, because we get growth out of that. I think the idea of eliminating that just so that you can make the optimal decision as determined by somebody else based on some value system, which in the case of technocracy is anti-free will. I think that's a bad idea because, yeah, you'll get better decision making as determined by somebody with the ideology that promotes technocracy which i think is what most people's fundamental inherent beliefs and

values are yeah well i noticed that everybody is happy to control somebody else um if they don't like what they're doing but the minute that somebody else tries to control them all of a sudden it's a problem so You know, you look at the Democrats and the Republicans alike, they're trying to control the other side all the time instead of just taking hands off and saying, you know, do what you want. And this is the danger of this, that what Jarvin is pushing with this idea that we should have a king or a CEO and basing and giving authority to someone based on merit. But, you know, giving all of the authority to someone based on merit.

I'm not going to take anything away from what Musk has created. People may say he didn't actually create I mean, whatever. any of these things or whatever. I'm not even going to go there. Let's just assume he did create the stuff I mean, that he created. he also sent his kids to the most liberal indoctrination school in So his whatever child that he had that California. did a gender flip or whatever, when you look at what school he sent them to, was a bad exercise in judgment he got vaccinated i mean he's he's demonstrated some pretty poor decision making he may be great at building rockets he may be great in the realm of materialism and applying first principles if you believe first

principles are are you know mechanics um but solely based on materialism, which I don't even think is right, but that's what his own decision-making is. He's great at that, but that doesn't mean he should be given authority over other people. Those things are not compatible and they get confused a bit. And this is what Yarvin is pushing. And there's a big, there's a lot of libertarian support for this. And I don't think it's very well thought through. One of the other things that Yarvin's been really pushing kind of racism. I mean, he's even said some races just, you know, want to be slaves. He's actually made statements about, poor people should be segregated. you know,

And, you know, basically given VR headsets, here's a whole bunch of different views. And they're not, they're not great from a from a liberty perspective, but they but they're gaining in popularity as backlash against the woke movement. But again, like I said, at the end, if you give the executive branch more power. I'll give you an example of another thing that Trump's doing that should be alarming. Trump passed an executive order for a sovereign wealth fund. Sovereign wealth funds are what dictators and monarchs have around the world. This is a tool that they use, and it's anti-capitalism. It's certainly anti, I mean, it's fundamentally anti-American. And now-

you know it hasn't been passed into law yet but they've been pursuing it they've been taking an approach of we're not going to ask for um for permission and probably not going to ask for forgiveness either but you know for instance we now own nine point nine percent of whatever of intel and they were able to use loopholes to do that uh we now own part of lithium americas and there are a whole bunch of other countries and and the whole plan with this with tokenization is to expand and build a huge sovereign wealth fund. This is a horrible anti-American idea. And there's no resistance to this. Because people don't understand it. I mean, when you think about what happened with

the mortgage meltdown, where they securitized mortgages right and so what did that enable them to do it enabled them to package and repackage mortgages over and over again in an endless supply of packages of mortgages that they could sell over and over again it was a license to print money so now they're going to tokenize it so now you can package tokens and package tokens and package tokens endlessly And just sell packages of tokens? And just repackage them? And at the end, legally, they've already structured it so that the next time this blows up, the big banks who are the creditors of your broker end up with the tokens and

end up with your assets. So it's actually worse. We have a worse structural situation than we had in two thousand and eight. We think we've made things structurally worse since two thousand and eight. And tokenization weaponizes all of us. We're basically making, they've made the mortgage a four Oh one K. I mean, in all essence, which is even worse. So Dan, Dan O'Neill is texting me in the background. So I ducked out for a second to see what he was talking about. And he wants me to share a story with you guys. So if you got it. i was walking to the beach one day i'm in my wetsuit if you can imagine this right i've got my surfboard in my hand you know i'm obviously not carrying a

weapon um and uh i see a uh a big bus that says from tunnels to towers and i see a few guys out there with red coats under a little uh you know pop-up um like stand thing with a table sitting there talking. And I go over and I say, hey, so, you know, what's going on here? What's inside the van? And they say, oh, it's about nine eleven. I said, yeah, I see that. I go, you know, what do they what do they tell you in there? Do they tell you what happened to building seven? And they're like, yeah, it collapsed. And I'm like, yeah, I know, I know it collapsed, but I'm like, does anybody say how it happened? Like, did it spontaneously catch on fire?

Did something fall on top of it? Was it controlled demolition? And they go, oh, you're one of those conspiracy theorists. And I was like, no, actually, I'm not. I said, I really am genuinely wondering, was anybody there? Did any of you actually see it? you know, and what happened? And one of the guys goes, yeah, he was there that day. So I went up to the guy and I said, yeah, so I'm really curious, you know, what happened that day? You were there, you saw the building go down, you know, did it, you know, how did it go down? And next thing you know, some guy comes up to me and he says, sir, you need to leave. And I'm like, what, why do I need to leave? He says, you know,

we can't have you around the children. I said, what am I dangerous? I go, I got a third port in my hand. Yeah. And he says, yeah, you know, this is, this is a private, uh, parking lot. Jenkinson's funded this event and you're not welcome here. You need to leave. So, um, with that, he says, uh, I'll call the police if I have to. So I said to him, all right, call the police. You know, so the next thing you know, I'm surrounded by six police officers with my surfboard in my hand and they're getting in my face and they're telling me that they're going to arrest me for trespassing.

And because I'm dangerous. And I said, I said to him, so what am I dangerous? Because I'm asking questions that the kids might actually start asking questions and wonder what actually happened. Is that what the danger is? And, um, finally they were like, listen, if you don't leave now, we're going to, we're going to copy you. So I just went and surfed and, you know, I left, but, um, I mean, amazing, right. That they got that worked up over asking a question. Yep. I mean, that, that is how propagandized we are. Right. We were, we're, we're taught to not question. anything we really don't question anything

that's why i played that clip from from newsroom we don't realize the degree to which and what you brought up is like does this whole what is politically politically correct or what what you can say in polite society which is a it's a form of censorship it's a form of censorship and i have it on this attention quiz that i have because you know we've We've been hijacked in a variety of ways, and our attention is one of the areas that's been hijacked. And this whole what is what you're allowed to say in polite society is a big There are very clear guidelines where you one. can't talk about these certain issues at all. And you're not you will not be platformed

and you may even be kicked out of and ostracized socially. Mm hmm. Even if you are correct and this happened, we have it's not just woke. Right. This isn't even this is beyond woke. This happens whether you're on the right or whether you're on the left. There's there's only a very narrow channel of what what is permissible to discuss. And that's problematic. And you obviously face this in a major way. You were talking about before about like, well, Dan and I talk about the concept of an Overton window often because he's definitely shifted mine. You're shifting mine right now from this conversation. But, you know, many people have a real problem with

anything that shifts their worldview. And I used to watch a TV program called Brain Games. Have you ever heard of it? brain game. It was another one of these Netflix originals. And it was pretty cool program where it showed you what your brain was capable of and what your brain was not capable of and how they, how easy it was to trick your brain with different things. And so it, in one episode, it talked about how your brain has a mechanism that protects itself from stress. And so, uh, and it particularly affects your eyesight

quite a bit. So, um, you only see in high resolution a spot from your eyes about the size of your thumbnail. Everything else around that thumbnail is pixelated in reality and your brain paints it in. So you don't really see very much. And if you've ever experienced tunnel vision, That's what your eyes actually see when you get tunnel vision. And I experienced that once in my life where I got tunnel vision out of a very stressful situation. And so I know that it exists. I've seen it firsthand. But this idea that your brain will paint in everything around this high resolution

spot in the middle of your sight is just amazing what your brain can do. There have been several times in my life where I thought to myself, that person was looking right at me, yet they pulled out in front of me, or they almost ran me over, or they almost hit me, or whatever. And how did that happen? How did they not see me? One day I was sitting at a traffic light right next to somebody who just pulled up next to me. The light turned green, and he proceeded to drive right into the side of my car. And when I got out of the car to talk to him, I said, what happened? He goes, I didn't see you. But we both pulled up to the light together, stopped for the light. When the light turned green,

he just drove right into me. He goes, yeah, he goes, I don't know, I just didn't see you. And I thought, holy cow, that was his brain basically painting me right out. Because I wasn't in that one spot in his eye. And his brain didn't want me to be there, so he just drove right into me. And people do that in their regular life with things that are too stressful for them, so... when you bring up these things, and I asked AI about it recently too, I said, why is it that I bring things up to people that are very clear to me and obvious, um, and should be obvious to them because they're experienced the impact of it, but they refuse to accept it as a possibility or that it's real.

And then they actually treat me as if I'm a problem for bringing it to their attention. And, um, AI said, yeah, that's the brain's mechanism for making itself feel safe. And the older you get, the more your brain does it. It gets better and better at lying to you. Bringing up that point, that actually makes sense why there's so many, especially with all the cars that are on the road anymore, the high stress situations, you got to go, go, go lifestyle. You have to be here at this meeting or here at work now. That actually kind of makes sense now on how your brain is reacting and why people are in so many accidents, why there's so many accidents daily just

on your commute to work or home from work. I wonder to what degree that's biological or if that's actually something that we push. Well, it seems to be, look, it's all part of the same mechanism because if you want to manipulate society, you stress them out to impose change, right? So the propaganda is used to create stress in certain ways that they know people will move away from or towards whatever they the movement towards or away from. want. Um, but, um, you know, I, I see it, you know, with my father and his wife, you know, I, you know, I talk about some of the stuff and

if you took the COVID vaccine and I let's face it, come around and I start telling you how, you know, parable cancer and, you know, heart inflammation and, you know, autism and, you know, you have, maybe you have an autistic child and you vaccinated your child and now You have to live with the guilt that you vaccinated your child and gave him autism. No parent wants that. I can tell you, having kids, that I have stress about the fact that my kids got childhood vaccinations. And I remember them when they were five years old being bright and inquisitive and just really amazing kids and coming back from their wellness visit. And I was like, what happened to my kids? They didn't get autism, Now,

but they were not the same. So, you know, I suffer from that realization that I didn't know better at the time. It's a tough pill to swallow. It is a tough pill to swallow. Yeah, I mean, the COVID thing has kind of gone away to a certain degree. People don't want to talk about it. People don't want to... to admit what happened. But we've been but again, I go back to we've been conditioned to have this response because, yes, fear does work. I mean, we're either in fight and flight or we're in rest and digest. But I think we've been structured

societally to be more in this fearful state. And you can look at it as and I have it on this attention survey. I have a survey on own nothing dot In fact, com. Are you an NPC? And I mean, the idea behind this is that, that people, I don't think people are actually like non-playable characters in the sense that it's like a video game, but, but if you, the first seven years of your life, your brain is in theta stage. And so you have no conscious control of whatever comes in. So whatever you're told by your parents, whatever you're told within your environment, that just goes in without any, any conscious thought. And that becomes part of your. identity you know someone says you're not

good enough or whatever these become these become limiting beliefs you can reverse that but you can only reverse it by subsequently getting into that same Theta state and acknowledging these things right this is and so this is this is like the first seven years and then you go through government school indoctrination which was heavily influenced deliberately by Rockefeller to create worker bees, to create a bell system where you kind of clock in and it was designed to make you a worker, not somebody that would challenge or create or out innovate. And so this becomes age seven to age eighteen. And then you get into a different level

of capture through media and everything else. And so the survey that I have kind of indicates all of that. And so my point, by the time you're thirty five, ninety five percent of your next day is the same as the day before, because you now have all of these ingrained habits. But you can break that. It is not just like you can break the limiting beliefs that you had before you were seven. You can break any of the other programming, but you have to acknowledge that there's programming, that you've been programmed. That's a tough pill to swallow, but it's a switch. Once you realize it, then you realize it actually has general purpose applicability. So I don't think that there's anything

inherent about the nature of man that says that we all have to act this way. I think that we've been largely institutionalized through all of this programming. Now that doesn't mean you can easily change it because actually getting someone to recognize that they're programmed and then to actively take steps to change it, that's not easy. Um, well, like look at yourself, you know, um, you know, you study this stuff. I, you know, I, this is your livelihood, right? So for me, I have to make money, you know, I have to make money. I have to make money. I have to make money. I have to make money. I have to make money. But I'm also self-employed and kind of

unemployable by corporate America because of the way that I think. Having had grown up in a family-owned business, my father and I used to work together all the time. We had a liquor store, we had a deli. I went into corporate America for a while and just was very frustrated by the lack of efficiency and stuff that went on in corporate America, but my tolerance for change and uncertainty is so much higher than the average person that I don't really fit in well with them because I'll talk about stuff matter-of-factly, Stuff that I see, patterns that I see,

and people look at me like I'm saying something out loud that you're not supposed to say. And I'm thinking like, well, doesn't everybody see this? Or am I the only one? And apparently most of the time I'm the only one or one of a few. And certainly one of the few that will actually say something about it. So like you said, if I'm not careful, I can make myself into a social outcast by bringing up these points. But for you, you live in this world probably most of your day, right? Seeing what's going on, seeing what's not really true compared to what's really happening.

And it's unsettling, too unsettling for most people. It's unsettling, but then again, it's, it is one of those things where once you see it, you can't unsee it. So, I mean, I got into this, I didn't start out, obviously it was, I started out as a serial entrepreneur and, and then, you know, I like to say I was radicalized three times. the first time I dropped out of college I mean, and started my, an internet company in the mid nineties and, you know, but I had this kind of, I ran objectivist free market capitalist And I thought that's what doing a startup approach. And then I, was like. um met with a hundred and fifty vcs met with wall street went through the

process of trying to go through an ipo and everything and then realized we actually have cronyism so this is like the mid to late nineties right i'm like all right we really don't have free markets so that that was the first one the second one was my second company was destroyed by uh by the government not i wasn't targeted it was it was just i was collateral damage from bad policy, right? So Obamacare and Dodd-Frank and everything else took a profitable, successful business and regulated it out of existence essentially overnight. And so then I'm like, okay, government's incompetent, right? So then that became my thing. So I became a liberty activist. And then I realized after engaging in

politics and trying that for a while, i realized that's how i kind of learned about technocracy i learned that this this isn't actually just if anything it's the best way to describe it is it's organized incompetence so there are people pulling the strings but they've created a structural system an organizational structure and a certification system and everything else where uh people have no incentive to question what's going on and you end up in a situation where like in the medical facility Most nurses that I know have good intentions and want to heal people. They have no idea that there could be possibly an ulterior motive to pushing a vaccine. Why? Because they have certification.

And of course they have to believe the doctor because the doctor's gone through all this education and all of these other things. And so then I realized it's actually a malicious system and then dug into who is actually behind it. And while I was kind of announcing the technocracy Atlas today, then I'm like, okay, this is an actual thing that you can document. Well, once you know that, I don't know. I couldn't not do what I'm doing now. I couldn't live with myself not trying to warn people about what's going on. I'm not saying it's easy to warn people or that the message gets through or it's getting through fast enough. But once you know it, you can't not do it.

That's kind of the way that's kind of the way the fact that I'm doing this is kind of bizarre. It certainly was never in any. Here's what I'm going to do with my life. It's just kind of one of the things where once you learn about it, Again, how do you possibly turn away? The only way you could do that is if you became addicted to drugs or something, to numb the actual knowledge of what's going on. If you actually confront what's going on without numbing yourself, you can't not warn people about it. That's kind of how I view it. I'm so busy most of the time trying to figure out how to just keep making money and go have fun. That's probably the way that I managed to

not deal with it just by being so busy otherwise. No, I mean, I went from being in a, you know, Yeah. six thousand square foot house to like, all right, I put everything in. I had two suitcases and I got to go. There's a longer story to get to getting into that where I'm like, you know, that's that's not that that's not that that's not the path. Otherwise, I get stuck, stuck in this situation. But, you know, again, I People do wake up. I mean, I have a lot of people, a lot of people don't, a lot more people watch this than talk. This is why I'm grateful that you guys joined. But a lot of people tell me privately that they've been, they have woken up, but it's, but then it is hard because it,

it's very unlikely that your friends and family are going to acknowledge what you're saying because there was a, there's a great quote from, I got to find, find the quote. It's anyways, it's by this guy, Charles Tartt. who's a psychologist, and he's like, you know, when you present information that's one level, if you want to say above their consciousness, they're intrigued. If it's two levels, they fall asleep. If it's three levels, they become angry. And if it's four levels above kind of their knowledge level or consciousness level, then they want to kill the person that's saying the information. And I actually thought that was kind of an interesting,

that's kind of an interesting statement, but it also follows a separate thing, which is kind of like how the adoption curve for technologies and ideas from, you know, you have, you have, uh, innovators, early adopters, and then you have kind of moving into mainstream or whatever. There's kind of, there's a parallel there, but, but I found that that's the case. Like if you, if to, to try to present these ideas to somebody who's three or four levels removed, and it's not to judge those people either, cuz I, cuz the thing that I wanna say about is, is that we're all again, I think We're in this situation because something happened earlier in life that kind of reveal what's going on.

So it's not like there's anything inherently superior about knowing this information. Generally, you learned about it by an unfortunate set of circumstances. So it's not that, oh, these people are NPCs and they're not. But what I like to say to people is the last thing I would want to do is go on mainstream news. And go on, you know, NBC or ABC and talk about these ideas because the audience would actually be They would be in the category three or hostile. category four. It would not be beneficial. And so ideas are kind of like, okay, you get innovators and then you get early adopters. There's a, there's a, there's an, there's being efficient about it and

moving it in the, in the right stages, because otherwise you're gonna get caught. And I know a lot of people that do this, like, well, they want, because, because you care about your friends and you want them to wake up and then family, people will spend an overabundance of time on something that's an unwinnable situation. If the gap is that big, you're not going to be able to solve it. It doesn't mean you don't care about those people. What it means is you've got to find the other groups first, and then it'll build momentum into those people, right? It's kind of like a lot of people that were like, well, I don't like the internet. I'm not going to use the internet.

There were people that were early eventually those people that were Well, adopters. anti-internet to begin with, or wanted to stay away from it, ended up being on the internet. It's just that they got their two, three, or four stages later and once you recognize that's generally how ideas as well as technology progresses then you can be okay with not everybody's going to get it right away and it's not that this needs to be nothing becomes mainstream right away everything goes through kind of a just generally these these phases that was really helpful for me and insightful for me because otherwise this would be really demoralizing thinking that that you know

this is something that people should just immediately get. Once you realize that there's more, it's more complex than that, then you can at least figure out a plan to try to move. Yeah. You know, during COVID, you know, I got on Facebook and there was a group called Around Robbinsville. I was living in Robbinsville at the time. And I didn't realize that this Around Robbinsville group was actually organized by a group of five Democratic women. So it had a political agenda. Um, I was oblivious to it because I wasn't in politics and just, you know, now all of a sudden I had a little time on my hands and I'm in this around Robsville site and they started posting stuff that I knew was wrong.

Right. And so I would go out and I would just do a little bit of research. find some data or a study or something that didn't support what they were saying. And I would just post that link underneath the comment, just quietly, just post it and say, you might want to take a look at this data. And Oh my God, the, the, the lash back that I got, you know, like, what are you doing? You're going to get people killed, you know? And I'm like, How am I going to get people killed? It's data. They're going to stop wearing their masks. They're going to stop taking their vaccines. You're going to get us all killed. I was out driving around because there was

no cars on the road. I had a great time. I went all the way to New York in an hour to take my real estate class exam that I had to take in person. And I actually parked in front of the building Um, where I had to go because there were no cars. And so I came back and I posted that on the internet and I got so much crap for driving around during COVID. Unbelievable. Um, you know, the way people were acting, but, uh, I eventually learned that I needed to ask questions. So instead of, uh, posting data or espousing my opinion,

I would ask a line of questioning that would lead them to the same solution or realization that I arrived at when I started asking questions. And it was really funny because then I had other people coming to me in the side or direct messaging me going, oh, I love the way you ask those questions. I love the way you do what you do. You're so good at it. I wish I could do that. And I just thought that was really funny that I had developed this skill of asking questions and cornering them into making themselves look stupid by their own answers. Yeah, no, I mean, they're certainly, yeah,

getting somebody to get there on their own is an effective way to do it. And you raise a good point. This is even true with the sites that i'm building everything else i do not provide a lot of facts and information but most people whether they want to admit it or not don't make decisions necessarily rationally which isn't even necessarily a bad thing the intuition is is a real thing and i think we've tended to go to left brain focus which is actually somewhat problematic even ties into the technocracy thing but there's a i listened to this guy uh walter kern who gave a really interesting talk that he's right we have to do a better job of of storytelling he's working on a movie about

kobe he's like you know you can't if you try to hit people with all the stats in the world even now about what happened it won't work but you have to be able to to reach in at a deeper level than just um just kind of the left brain and that's a big part so this is why kind of like for me for instance one of the biggest you know, identify, when you think about this technocratic fight, in fact, I have a website, Freedom Forge, and the idea is, you know, you identify the technocratic threat, and then people can build parallel solutions to it. So what is the parallel solution to CBDCs or government regulated stablecoins? Well, there's something called Freedom Dollar,

which is a privacy stablecoin, algorithmic stablecoin that's not backed by treasuries. And that's one example. Or in the case of healthcare, it's like, okay, You don't have to be stuck with picking between two health insurance plans, both of which won't actually provide you with coverage or help you improve your You can form a medical trust, health. use medical tourism, and all of these other things. But even within that realm, and I have all the stats and everything else that can back up how everybody's getting robbed in the health care system and everything else, the most impactful thing will be a single person selling or telling their story i had a play a small clip about a woman who

shows that she had a fifty one thousand dollar bill she uh she had her baby delivered no complications no issues whatsoever and she went through and revealed on social media line item by line item everything that summed up fifty one thousand fifty one thousand dollars people sharing their own stories but we have situations where people are getting ripped off everywhere but nobody shares the stories because they're embarrassed oftentimes people are in these situations where they're being taken advantage of and they don't want to talk about it because they're embarrassed but then what you realize is this is actually happening to everybody yeah you know when i was a

similar story when i was uh forty you know they convinced me to go get uh endoscopy uh you know they and um and so i went in they told me it was going to be i think twelve hundred dollars And when I got out, it was two thousand dollars. And I was like, what happened? They were like, well, this doctor came and looked at you and this doctor came and looked at you and this doctor came and looked at you. So that's that was an extra, you know, eight hundred dollars. I'm like, well, who are they? What did they do? Oh, well, they looked at your slides, they looked at your results, you know, they consulted on, you know,

the results of your scope. Okay. Was there a result, like something? No, everything was normal. Okay. You know, there was no way for me to argue I never even knew if they came or it. didn't. You know, why they came, who told them to come. Yeah, he's got this bill. And the funny thing is, Yep. you couldn't have shopped it in advance. This is one of the things that I talk about is that up until twenty twenty one, hospitals were not allowed to disclose their prices. And then after twenty twenty one, there was a law passed that said you required to reduce your prices or you pay

a three hundred dollar a day penalty. Well, eighty four point seven percent of hospitals in the United States pay the penalty rather than show their pricing. And when you get pricing shows, it shows things. I actually have this on the OSR site. I mean, We're launching this officially, I guess on Thursday, but there's kind of a breakdown here. This is true of everyone that people don't realize the degree to which it's not even about insurance or not insurance. So here's some examples. So each hospital has something called the charge master, which is their price list, which again, most of them don't, don't show. Tylenol, the actual cost of a Tylenol is ten cents.

Hospital charges, thirty seven dollars. Thirty seven thousand percent increase. Surgical gloves. Fifty three dollars cost. Seventy five cents. An alcohol swab. You may get a bill for a single alcohol swab. Twenty three dollars. The actual cost is two cents. One hundred and fifteen thousand percent markup. But here's the thing. You can't know in advance. So obviously, if you have an emergency situation, you may not even be in a position to ask. But even if you did ask, they're not going to tell you. And so you can't even comparison shop to know, oh, they're going to charge me twenty three dollars or thirty three dollars or five cents for an alcohol swap. This is why these bills are ridiculous.

Imagine if all of the millions of people that are getting ripped off every year started sharing their medical bills on social media. Then everybody would sit around and say, what is going on here? And this doesn't have any, this has nothing to do with Obamacare or whether the government's involved or not. This is a systemic fraudulent situation that's baked into the healthcare system. Imagine having a situation where they don't disclose pricing. How can you have a situation where nobody tells you how much something costs and you can't find it out? And then if you don't pay it, they're gonna take your house. Yeah. So, you know, I, uh, I use a, um, a health insurance that's called share care.

Are you familiar with how they work? Um, so I have, uh, you know, and this particular one comes with a service where, uh, let's say, you know, I, my knees bother me. I think I need an x-ray. call them up and I say, hey, can you figure out where I can go to get an x-ray? And they'll go out and shop around and find me a place. They'll say, well, how far are you willing to travel? I say, I'll go twenty five miles. They'll find me the cheapest place within twenty five miles to get my x-ray. And so what I learned, though, from this share care and this shopping service that they use is just how cheap things really are like. i had no idea i needed a prescription

for something one day and it was two dollars i was like two dollars i said but when you have insurance your copay is twenty five or fifty they said yeah two dollars like that's insane you know and then you know my my x-ray on my knee was fifteen dollars like that's unbelievable fifteen dollars for an x-ray that's it And then I had to have a crown once. Actually, I got two crowns. So I had two different experiences, one with insurance, where the crown cost me twelve hundred dollars, and one without insurance, and the crown cost me eleven hundred So it was a hundred dollars cheaper to dollars. get it without insurance than it was to

get with insurance. And I remember my dentist being so happy that they were like, oh, you got a really good insurance policy. And I was thinking to myself, I do? And she goes, yeah. And I said, so does that mean my crown is going to be less? No, I get paid more. So my crown was a hundred dollars more, but that insurance company paid her more. So it was good for her. I was like, what the hell is going on here? Yeah. So it's that broken. So insurance companies aren't even really And now because of businesses. they actually get twenty percent of the Obamacare, cost. So they actually have an incentive for cost to go up because they're actually

getting twenty percent of I mean, imagine that you get twenty percent of the gross. what kind of financial incentive is that? Well, So this is why I'm launching the medical because it turns out and I didn't realize tourism thing, how substantial this is, but on average, you save like seventy to eighty percent. overseas and then everybody's like oh well this must be cosmetic surgeries or you're just getting like these awful doctors and it turns out you can get complex bypass surgery in heart bypass surgery in India for seven thousand dollars for better health outcomes than the Mayo Clinic you can get treatments like it's it's it you and then you get other treatments that you

can't even get here because of the FDA like this is how So because the other thing that we that we've largely bought is that there's some people that will actually still say we have the best health care in the country, which is objectively has not been true for decades. That is not even a recent phenomenon. But then people will say these things like, well, you know, we're subsidizing the rest of the world with R&D, you know, big pharma like people have all these different things that they say. And absolutely none of it is true. We don't you can go to places Where when you do some of these medical tours and it turns out Thailand is actually the big destination.

They do like seven billion dollars a year in medical tourism. But when you go there, the way that I say it, it's like their facilities are like being in the Jetsons and ours are like being sort of like a prison. You're actually treated like a customer. You can go to Thailand. with a partner business class have a hip replacement or whatever the surgery is and stay there for two weeks for recovery all of the medications and everything and the cost of that is equal to just the cost of the room for the procedure at the cleveland clinic like it's it's mind-blowing here's another one in mexico there's a place called molar city that has like population is five thousand for the whole

town they're like three hundred and fifty dentists there it's the highest per capita dentist in the world but you can go across the border and and what you find is a lot of these medical professionals are people that went to Harvard and Johns Hopkins and they're like I can't work within this system if you actually wanted to treat somebody and you cared about somebody's health and then you realize that the standard of care is whatever big pharma bought and paid for, and you have to follow that rule, plus medical malpractice, plus now you have to be associated with a hospital and follow their rules. Well, you're not practicing medicine. You're implementing a big pharma sales strategy.

You're a pharmaceutical salesman. So a lot of the best doctors go to these other countries, and then they build these facilities that are completely different. And I've been baffled to learn about which You can go to Turkey. countries. And you can get the equivalent of an executive health exam here, where it's like a full workup. And the other interesting thing is, with a lot of these procedures, the wait time is zero. You can actually book these things and get them done now. I think it takes, on average, four to six weeks now to get an appointment with a specialist in the United States. So the gap in our health care here, people have no idea. We go back to this idea,

like I was saying before. You know, what's going to happen with the WEF versus Trump? It's like two sides of the same thing. People don't realize that they think that the only choice is, oh, I'm going to get a health savings account. The Republicans are pushing an expanded health savings account. Well, what's a health savings account? It's a... It's a combination, it's a CBDC and social credit system. It's the IRS telling you what percentage of your own money you can use to buy, to spend on healthcare services that are determined by the industry. And they've been marketed as freedom. So you'll see Republicans say, well, we're pushing a free market solution that

gives people control of their own money. No, you're not. You're giving the IRS control over how much we can spend on the big pharma complex. And yet people buy that it's free market. It's insane. It goes beyond just health care, too. I mean, it's silly. But, you know, the Powerball was just up to one point four billion. Right. I just found out that like even in like England and I know it's England, but We're so constrained to the IRS and all the regulations and taxes that the winner, like the winner that just won it got like, what, four hundred million after they paid out the taxes?

You keep the earnings if you win their version of the Powerball or their lotto tax free. It's like just silly things like that. We are literally co-opted by tax regulation. even for the silliest. Well, that's the amazing thing about lotteries are, uh, I mean, I'll actually say, well, you know, the odds are so bad that, you know, we don't want people to be able to privately rip people off. So what do we do? We have the government do it, as you said, and then tax it like this. And then the people that play the lottery are disproportionately very low income people. I don't remember the exact stat, but like, it's a, It actually is meaningfully impactful how much lower income people spend on this.

And then what do they do with the funds? They use the funds to fund education. Talk about a bad set of incentives. We're teaching probability. We're obviously not teaching probability with the with the money or we're not doing a very good job of it. It's complete nonsense. You know, it's like this is a bad thing. It's a socially bad thing. People shouldn't be able to do it unless it's us. And then we're going to have a monopoly on it. And then we're going to take a disproportionate share. And then we're going to malinvest it in things that are going to make sure that people continue to want to play these games. It is sickening, too, when you look at where the money goes.

No, I'm not good at all. Hey, I'm going to call it a night, guys. Yeah, I think I am too. I think it's been going on about five hours. But I want to thank you both for showing up. It was a great conversation, and we'd love to have you guys back And I'm going to play what I think on again. is at least tentatively the Technocracy Atlas anthem on the way out. So I hope you guys enjoy that. If you stick around, if not, anyway, I'll play it anyway. Sounds good. Catch you later, guys. Have a great night. Have a good night.

started with one photo one connection one name ran it through google images reverse searching no shame found three more photos found a fly log found a date cross-referenced with public records now i'm up to wait tagged it in the discord someone found the company someone else members the donations the chain now we got forty seven people mapping the campaign one becomes two becomes ten becomes more truth has a net rock effect we can't ignore every connection reveals ten more doors this is the cascade this is the score

We can't stop the flow. Every cover I'm connecting now the whole world knows. Cascade. Cascade. Truth cascade. In the image we extracted the GPS from the location from the property records from the LLC from the shop

Five becomes fifty becomes spread Truth is exponential once it leaves your head Every whistleblower empowers ten more instead This is the cascade, this is the thread Truth cascade Watch it dial me, no one investigation lead to They try to compartmentalize, separate the scandals. Keep the connections hidden,

but we're digital vandals. Taking down the walls between the separate lives. Watching the cascade reveal the enterprise. Truth cascade Watch it dial me No one investigation

Cascade Cascade True Cascade Started with one photo Ended with five hundred connections That's the Cascade That's the power

Live free or die, but death's not the worst It's waking up empty, it's dying of thirst Trading your days for insurance and pills While the machine builds your cage and you're paying the bills Quiet aspiration, that's the real grave A life half lived as a comfortable slave This ain't what you were born for, you know it's true You feel it in your chest, breaking through They're wiring the walls, closing in Tracking your dollars underneath your skin

same crown no one stands up no one makes a sound they hand you a ballot like it means something real two wings of one bird same deal same steel we say no no to the chase no to the dollar running through our veins no to the white coat's It hurts right here, it hurts right now Your rights are yours, you take them back, not giving out Not from the left, not from the right They were always yours, now step into the light As the daylight

breaks, a new day comes We take it back again We fan the flame Nothing will ever be the same

Hey!