Trump's War Machine Empire EXPOSED (1)

Another head hangs slowly. A child is slowly taken. She braided up her hair that morning. Seven years old and forsaken. The missile found the classroom roll 3 seconds from the door. Mother cries into the evening.

The same cry she heard before. But she sees it's not me. It's not where I believe it's my daughter in the share in a school across the sea with their legs and their bombs and their coins and their head in your head. They are burning when you're a dollar. your darling.

The star price hit a record. The sun sold 10,000 drones. The draft is on the table now, but the tall boy stays at home. 6' 8 you go. 6' n you're free. One inch between the body bag and the boy who holds a key. But you see it's not me. It's not my family. The sun is one inch from the draft and a

million miles from the infantry with their tanks and their bombs and their clothes and their coins and their sons and their sons in your head. In your head they are falling with your daughter. You're not with your 70 billion to rebuild what they bomb. Smart cities where the school used to

stand. They call it the board of peace, but peace does not have a chairman. Peace does not need your money to exist. So stop giving it to them. Every dollar, another missile, every dollar, another drone, every dollar, another checkpoint, every dollar, another home, every cent is a tiny bomb. Every bill is a tiny cage. Every dollar that you spend tonight on a tiny break cuz you see it's not me. It's not my family,

but the dollar in my pocket built the bomb that killed her. Were dead and their bombs and their clothes and their coins and their sons and their sons in your head. In your head, you are falling with your daughter. We know it's your

Lord. Did your door? Another head hangs slowly. A child is slowly taken. She braided up her hair that morning. Ditch the dollar. Bring her home.

Looks like I kind of fucked up. You've seen the pose and so have I. I got elected. I'm no new war. And now we'll be lucky don't stand to fly. I tried to cover up the empty files. Seems as though I'm a file. Always going to keep you up. Always going to let you down. Always going to stand your back and betray you. Always going to make you. Always going to make you cry. Always going to tell you lies and betray you. I've been president for so long then over six years now the swarm still in

training inside with both know what's been going wrong Israel got takes for me deadlined if you wantedations I've been less than old bomb did always going to keep you always going to let you down so you turn around I'll backst you. I was going to make you sigh. I was going to make you cry. I was going to tell your lies and betray you. I was going to kiss you up. I was going to let you down. So you turn around you. I was going to make you sigh. I was going to make you cry. I was going to tell your lies and betray you.

Bring it. Bring it every you. I was going to let you down. Second you turn around. I'll make you. I was going to make you s I was going to make YOU CRY. I WAS GOING TO TELL YOU LIES. I was going to lift you up. always going to let you down. I'll let you make

Oh started with one photo, one connection, one name. Ran it through Google images. Reverse searching no shame. Found three more photos. Found a fly log. Found a date. Cross reference with public records. Now I'm up to tagged it in the Discord. Someone found a company. Someone else found the offshore. Count and believe. Someone else found the board members, the donations, the chain.

Now we got 47 people mapping the campaign. One becomes, two becomes, 10 becomes more. Truth has a net rocket we can't ignore. Every connection reveals 10 to more doors. This is the cascade. This is the score. Truth cascade. Watch it down. We know one investigation leads to another. Watch it go. Truth cascade. We can stop the flow. Every cover up connected. Now the whole world. No. Cascade. Cascade. Cascade. Truth cascade. Cascade. Cascade. Can't be delayed. Can't be related. But I did embedded in

the image. We extracted the GPS from the location. Found the property records. Found the LLC. Found the shell company. Found a parent. Found a CEO. Cross reference political donations. Now we got the quid proquo. Someone made a spreadsheet. Someone made a map. Someone made a timeline. Someone made a slap. Someone made a tick tock. 2 million views in a day. Someone made it up organize the array. One becomes, five becomes, 50 becomes spread. Truth is exponential once it leaves your head. Every whistleblower empowers 10 more instead. This is the cascade. This is the thread. TRUTH CASCADE. WATCH IT DOWN ME. No one investigation lead to another. Watch it

go. Truth cascade. We can stop the flow. Every cover up connected. Now the whole world knows. Cascade cascade. Cascade. Truth. Cascade. Cascade. Cascade. Can't be delayed. They try to compartmentalize. Separate the scandals. Keep the connections hidden. But we're digital vandals taking down the walls between the separate lies. Watching the cascade reveal the enterprise. >> One truth leads to another. >> One day >> lead to another. >> One lead to another.

>> ONE THREAD the cascade. >> TRUTH CASCADE. WASH IT DOWN. WE know one investigation leads to another. Watch it go. Truth cascade. We can stop the flow. Every cover up connected. Now the whole world knows cascade. Truth cascade it's exponential. One person finds a thread becomes existential. Truth cascade is consequency. Every secret that they bury now is preential. Cascade cascade. Truth cascade. Cascade. Casket can't be delayed. Can't be delay.

>> Cascade cascade. True cascade. Started with one photo, ended with 500 connections. That's the cascade. >> That's the >> All right, welcome back to the Aaron Day Show. This is season 3, episode 10. Uh, despite what that says up here, this was uh the title slide for uh last week's episode. And so, obviously, we have this

uh on a different day this week. Usually, the show is Thursday at 6 p.m., but I'm going to be on vacation for the next week. So, we thought we would uh try to do this today as opposed to trying to do it on the road, which we've had minimal success with. Usually, we have some kind of internet connectivity issue or something like that. And so, um we're going to have a special guest on today. Craig Wankowitz will be joining us uh to discuss what's going on with the Board of Peace in the broader context of World War II or whatever you want to call it is that we're engaged in right now. So I'll do the initial remarks now and then I'll bring uh Craig on for the main discussion. Um so last

week we discussed Enemies of the State. I encourage you to check that out. Episode nine, season three. And we had Dan O'Neal on to discuss um the event coming up at the enemies of the state event at the Libertarian National Convention. It's a some separate event that goes alongside and will be in the same venue. And we also featured Roman Storm and talked about his tragic case where uh the government decided to actually retry him on uh two counts that were, you know, previously had a uh inconclusive result. And so now he's looking at potentially 40 years instead of five years, which is where it had been heading. So I encourage you to go

to free romanstorm.com and check that out. Um, I'm going to be highlighting, you know, some aspect of the enemies of the state party and the people that we're advocating for uh in every episode between now and that event. But that is a a tragic story and also indicates that as I've been saying, the war on crypto is not only not over, it's accelerated under Trump. More people are being indicted. uh people are being tried, sentenced and in the case of Roman Storm uh retrieded. So um there is no indication whatsoever that the war on crypto is over particularly for people who advocate for economic freedom, peace and privacy.

The episode prior to that was uh kind of a broader episode about my run for US Senate. When I get back from spring break, I'm going to hit the campaign very aggressively. So, we're going to begin collecting signatures to get on the ballot and are really going to ramp up the campaign itself. Uh, but as you recall, the whole point of this is, as I did successfully in 2016, the whole point is to try to get Trump to do what he said he was going to do. Um, and you know, in which case, you know, maybe I maybe I don't end up running. Um, but once the signatures are collected and submitted, there's no getting me off the ballot. And at this point, as of last week, the Democrats now have a slight

edge to capture control of the Senate. And it's a pretty much a foregone conclusion that they're going to win back the House. So, um, clearly Trump has has and the Republicans have not lived up to in any way, shape, or form their campaign promises. And you know, at this point, at the rate that it's going, New Hampshire could very well turn out to be the make it or break it point for the US Senate. And so, if they lose the House and the Senate, then basically Trump's looking at probable impeachment in the House and delays in the Senate and, you know, basically uh whatever his agenda might be, which at this point I slowing down his agenda is probably a good thing based on what

we've seen so far. But um but from his perspective, if I'm Trump, I'm looking at this, you know, you know, maybe he should try to do something. And that something could be actually end the war on crypto, pardon these crypto PS, stop the Clarity Act, which is the largest surveillance bill in the history of the United States, and involves basically centrally controlling and tokenizing everything we own, and making it easy to program and confiscate not just the money that you use, but all of your investments and everything that you own. uh firing Howard Lutnik, uh which we've talked about on several episodes long before everyone else started to realize who Howard Lutnik was. And then the last

thing I'm adding kind of a fourth component to it is he needs to absolutely take off the table the draft. Uh which is outrageous. He ran on no wars in the Middle East and now they're talking about the draft. So I'll be putting something out more formally maybe this week uh about what's going on with respect to that. But if those things don't happen, then then yeah, then I'm on the ballot and the Republican is sure to lose and my campaign will be all about teaching people how to exit the system. I'm not running on the idea that I can go and fix Washington DC. I'm running on the idea that Washington DC can't be fixed, but we never should have given our rights to it's d our rights do not come

from Washington DC. We need to remember that and we need to start taking direct control uh of our own lives, our own money, our own healthcare and the best way to do that is to just exit the system which is what I the campaign will be about. uh podcast before that was with Ray Yousef, another crypto P similar charges as Ian Freeman and we will certainly be uh talking about him or hopefully maybe he can even attend the enemy's uh the state conference and just if you're looking the dates for the Libertarian Convention are May the 21st through the 25th in Grand Rapids, Michigan. So I'm going to be there for the whole conference but not participating in the actual

conference itself. there's a crypto corner. So, I'm going to be there to talking to people about how they can exit the system and use privacy coins and use the daylight freedom solutions that that we've launched. And then we'll be participating in the enemies of of the state parties. The enemies of the state party is going to be great. I mean, I I don't even know now how many, you know, we're probably going to have a dozen people that we're advocating for. It's going to be a great venue. Uh the same people that did the event in 2024, right? that, you know, the night before Trump came out and announced that he was going to commute Ross Holrich's sentence. Same team and just phenomenal,

you know, vibe for the event. So, I encourage you to check that out. So, I'm going to bring on uh Craig and walk through this tonight just as a an intro to this. uh you know as everybody knows who's been watching this show I've been focused on warning people first about CBDC's and then about technocracy and the funny thing is if you know what's going on in the world with the conflict in the Middle East it turns out middle east turns out you're going to run across technocracy again and so you know if you've been following the the story uh when was the last time you felt like the news was telling you the truth

kind of semblance of an answer on on both sides. But if you listen to both sides, Israel's been obliterated and Iran has been obliterated. And so, uh, that's not the case. Most of the videos are um, but what we're going to go through tonight is I want to kind of show you a pattern that started in 1861 with JP Morgan selling defective rifles to the Union that blew off soldiers thumbs and ends in 2026 today with the president's sons investing in drone companies one week after their father started buying and 250 years of the exact same playbook the same war privateeering construct but it's a little bit

which is the first time in 250 years they're not even hiding it this time uh talk about with the board of peace you know the charter says chairman for life the stock ticker symbol is P USA. The son announces the Suns announced drone deals on social media. Uh Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law, presents a $30 billion Gaza real estate plan at Davos. He's pitching development. I mean, literally can be built on uh I'm going to walk through all the names. Craig and I are going to walk through uh all a variety of different facets of what's going on with this. But it's mind-blowing when you consider that actually some even people today are like we defeated the globalists, you know,

and people are talking about well the UN is going away. Well, the UN may or may not be going away. But when you look at the board of peace, it's hard to find any actual difference between the board and what it is people claim they didn't like about the UN. In fact, it even has some of the same overlapping characters. And so, um, so with that, I I'll kind of jump into this, you know, we'll start with kind of the, you know, the pattern here, as I said, which is, you know, war profiteering, but then I would say taken to the next level, which is this goes beyond war profiteering. It's war profiteering, but then also for the express purpose of expansion and expanding a technocracy. And none of it

has anything to do with America. America's interests are not being protected here. These expansions into areas like Gaza and so forth don't benefit the American people. They actually benefit specific investors, specific entities. These are the people profiting it, profiting from it. There's no America first or even America involvement in this other than providing the money and the troops to uh to benefit these people. Oh, I see we have Patrick Patrick Woods here. Oh, that's a surprise. All right. Well, there we go. Hey, Patrick. How are you? Hello,

Patrick. there. >> Hi guys. >> Hi. How are you? >> I'm pretty good, thank you. You were just you were just uh breaking up a little bit. Uh Aaron >> Oh, I was >> before I heard it. Courtney heard it as well. Hey. >> Yeah, I can hear it a little bit, too. How's my sound? Okay. >> All right. Is this any better? Can you hear me? Okay, now >> sounds good. >> Okay, good. All right. Well, welcome welcome on. Um, you know, we're talking about the board of peace here today and related ideas.

So, uh, glad to have you on, Patrick. I know you've you've written and covered this area a lot as well. >> You bet. It's uh it's this you you're h you're hitting a a major nerve at this point. This needs to be uncovered, unpacked, spread around all over the universe. This is the most egregious thing I've seen in my life. Uh v visv techtocracy taking over everything in sight. Incredible. >> Yeah, it is. It is. And actually, it wasn't on my radar either. I mean, I I actually when it was announced and everything and then I saw that silly press conference they had where everybody was was standing around celebrating under under the, you know, Board of Peace sign, but but uh it

really took digging into it to figure out what's going on here. And yeah, it's outrageous and no one's talk talking about it. You actually don't see it covered um obviously in mainstream news, but I'm not even seeing this talked about on alternative channels. And so I think you're right. This is a topic that that needs to blow up. People need to understand exactly what's going on here. And actually, from my perspective, having learned about it, uh it makes everything make sense. I mean, you may wonder why. What's going on in Venezuela? What's going on in Ecuador? Why are all of these things happening? And it seems like it doesn't make any sense until you understand what's going

on with the war uh board of peace. >> Exactly. Yeah. Incredible. Well, I was going to start start this with just a quick overview for people about who may not be familiar with kind of the history of war profitering just to put this take a few steps back and put it into context. And so I've got just a little bit of information here that might be helpful for people. Um you have as I mentioned in the intro JP Morgan uh got involved in this going all the way back to the Civil War. So this is kind of where it starts. Uh Morgan bought defective allcarbine rifles from the government for $3.50 each and then sold them back to a Union general for $22. And these were defective rifles.

They were actually blowing off soldiers thumbs. And so, you know, surprise surprise, this seems to be a pattern. Congress investigated and he was cleared by a federal judge. Uh but then Morgan went on to become the most powerful banker in American history. You then have also Brooks brothers who surp uh that were so cheap they actually dissolved in the rain and they called them shoddy millionaires. And so that's actually where the term comes from which I thought that was interesting because now you know Brooks Brothers today has a kind of a they rehab the brand uh fairly well. But this is 1861. So sell the government, defective weapons, soldiers lose their thumbs, nobody goes to jail.

So just kind of remember that that pattern. And it gets worse. We then have the SpanishAmerican War. In 1898, uh more soldiers died from the food than from the enemy. So um 3,000 soldiers died from food poisoning, only 280 from combat. the uh secretary of war Russell Alger arranged rushed contracts with Armor Swift and Morrison Co. and so uh they shipped imbalmed beef chemically treated adulterated beef was sent to the troops. So in the end this guy Alder was forced to resign but no criminal charges. The

contractors kept their money and the soldiers stayed dead. So, 3,000 soldiers killed by their own food supply and the Secretary of War arranged the contracts. But we're not done because this again, it's a pattern. World War I, we have the merchants of death. We have DuPont. Look at these numbers. So, the stock of DuPont went from 20 to a,000 during this time. They supplied 40% of all Allied propellant powder. So their annual profits went from 5 million to 82 million which was a 16x increase. There was something called the NY committee that investigated whether uh the bankers pushed America into World War I for profit. And um you know they

investigated of course they didn't come back and with any you know accurate results but then Congress then passed the first excess profits tax in American history but the bankers kept their money anyway. So they initially investigated whether Wall Street actually started a war for profit. The answer was probably yes, but then the punishment was attacks that they ended up finding a way around. So then in World War II, we have um uh Henry at the time, Senator uh Henry or excuse me, Harry Truman was, you know, one man from Missouri who created a committee with a $15,000 budget. He actually exposed 10 to 15 billion dollars in waste, which is the equivalent of$2 to300 billion in today's

terms. They found that Curtis Wright sold defective airplane engines to the military, forged the inspection reports. So Truman caught them. So this is the only time in 250 years that war profitering was actually confronted in real time. There were 400 hearings, subpoena power, public shaming. So one senator with $15,000 exposed 15 billion. And so, you know, remember that for the end. So, it is it is possible. Um, but after Truman, they made it sure they made sure it wouldn't happen again. So, we have a couple more examples. We have Vietnam um Lynden Johnson in Vietnam. This was this is a direct precedent of what's happening now. So, you had Brown and Root who bankrolled LBJ's entire

political career from Texas congressman to president. They funded every campaign. And there was a $380 million contract. So once LBJ escalated Vietnam, Brown and Root won the contract and the GAO found massive accounting lapses and widespread theft. The company that made him president literally got paid by his war. So you can replace the names. LBJ, Brown and Root, Trump, Kushner, Rowan, who we'll talk about tonight. Same basic concept. Sponsor the politician. Start the war. win the contracts. So, the company that funded his career got the war contracts from his war. And we're seeing that happen again. And again, I could go into

detail on all of these things in great at great length, but then you have Iraq. You have Dick Cheney and Hallebertton. And this is one that most people are familiar with, may maybe not some of the younger people, but the numbers are even worse than you may remember or, you know, were told at the time. Uh Cheney received a $36 million severance package from Hallebertton. So he was the CEO from 1995 to 2000. He left with $ 36 million and then still received a million dollars a year in deferred compensation as vice president. Right? So this is a new realm of you know usually you're paying off somebody else or maybe there's some kind of delay. This is like going on while he's actually actively

uh in power. There was a $7 billion no bid contract. KBR Hallebertton subsidiary got a $7 billion no bid contract and there was a whistleblower named Bonitine Greenhouse the Army's top contracting official uh who was demoted. So the total Hallebertton Iraq contracts uh totaled 39.5 billion dollar over the decade. So, this was a case where they were charging $45 for a case of sto soda, $85,000 for trucks that were abandoned in the desert, so on and so on. And so, you know, again, this at this point, I just want to make sure people are are

seeing the um the pattern. Iraq, $12 billion in cash on cargo planes. I mean, this is just absurd. You've probably seen some of these memes, but literally 12 billion dollars in cash. Paul Bremer's Coalition Provisional Authority flew 122 billion dollar in shrink wrapped $100 bills into Iraq on C130 cargo planes. It's the largest cash dispersement in US history. I guess maybe if exceptions might be for Medicaid as we find out about it a little bit more here over the over the next few months. But uh they basically used lemonade stand accounting. They use single entry cash accounting. No double entry books, literally zero audit trail. So 8.8

billion vanished. Iraqi oil revenues just gone. The Iraqi parliament says it's actually 18.7 billion. Ghost employees paid on payroll. Millions paid for phantom work. So they flew 12 billion dollars of cash into a war zone. Kept the books like a lemonade stand. 8.8 billion disappeared. Nobody went to prison. And but wait, there's more. We're almost at the end here until we get into the new the new fraud, the new day, which is Afghanistan, which was a $148 billion failure. This was a 20-year conflict. And you know what you need to know from a numbers perspective. Uh we built a $43 million gas station. So they built a compressed national gas station that was supposed to cost 50,000, but

ended up a little bit over budget at 43 million. um 26 to $29 billion confirmed lost. Actual losses may be up to $600 billion. So the uh cigar in inspector general called the Afghan government essentially a white collar criminal enterprise. Uh the CIA used cash to buy war warlord loyalty um binding America to notorious figures for decades. absolutely no oversight, no accounting, no consequences. So, $43 million gas station, $600 million in potential losses. An inspector general called the entire government a criminal enterprise. So, this is what we're looking at here. So,

the kind of the the summary of this comparison table didn't come out uh very well, but you know, the pattern is dollar amounts get larger every single war. The oversight gets weaker every single time. the accountability gets smaller until it completely disappears. And at this point, they've eliminated oversight entirely. No inspector general, no independent audit, no subpoena authority by design. Um, it's not really corruption because that implies that the system is supposed to work differently. This is actually baked into the fundamental process itself. So if you give a small group of people the power to wage war and write checks, they will wage war and

write checks to themselves every single time for 250 years. Uh so the board of peace charter wasn't corrupted, right? This isn't a situation where they started out with the board of peace and it became this horror show. It was literally written this way on purpose that the crafting of this was well aware of the 250 year history of of war profitering. um and they just now put it in writing. So uh so with that I just wanted to give everybody just the background here in the story just so that uh there's context for this even by this historical standards what we're going to talk about tonight is is next level. >> Amen. >> Yeah. Like you said Erin, follow the

money. That's the key, right? >> Exactly. Who said uh all bank all wars are banker wars? I don't remember who said that, but I I remember that in years gone by. >> Yeah, I heard that, too. I I I don't remember who uh >> it was probably the guy who wrote um Creature from Jack Island. What was his name? >> Yeah, it could be. Yeah, I I could hear an Anthony Sutton saying saying something that like like that as well. >> Michael Michael Rivero, an independent >> Yeah. journalist, radio host, and founder of the site what really happened.com, I guess, is >> okay. That >> Yeah. Well, we have we have a new uh

thing on the table now because with this with this business of tokenizing assets, not money, the all the cash that were on that airplane, it got distributed. It's just is incredible. But uh there's if if cash is going to be let out of the picture and tokens are coming in like like gang busters at this point especially Trump's new token token USD1 that's uh based on world liberty financial uh system that was started just in 2024 like September of 2024. for it's over

it's worth over 13.5 billion dollar at this point. Who does that except the president of the United States? But >> well, yeah, it's incredible. So, we've talked a lot about Tether and USDC in the past, but but boy, uh USD1 has has really emerged. Trump didn't want to get cut out of this and he I guess he looked at Lutnick and said, "Hey, look, I'm not gonna let Lutnik have all of the fun." Um, but the story behind the USD1 is uh is worse than than I thought. Trump essentially pardoned CZ, who is the CEO of Binance, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the world. And then

magically, right after the pardon, CZ arranges a $2 billion investment from Abu Dhabi into World Liberty Financial, which is the Trump decentralized uh platform. CZ also created the USD1 coin. He from a technical perspective, he actually is the one who basically built the token. And it's my understanding that CZ controls 80% of the supply of USD1. This is just mind-boggling to me. I wasn't paying any attention to to it because it looked like a kind of a shoddy platform. I'm like, "Okay, this is going to be another thing that Trump family puts their name on and, you know, they're just trying to like take get involved in the hype a little bit, have

an exchange." And then it turns out this USD1 stable coin is is serious business >> for for some months after 2024. Uh people were saying, "Well, it's it was just uh his son Baron who was just fooling around with meme meme coins, you know, and and then all of a sudden out of the gate comes World uh Liberty Financial, and now they're promoting it as quote unquote the up the upgrade for the dollar." >> Yes. Yeah, they are. And I think Pakistan some there's55 billion dollars worth of USD1 in Pakistan and as we'll talk about

this plays I I believe into the entire strategy of what what this adventurism that we're doing with all of these conflicts all over the world. I think it's an anchor for it. But before we get into that, I just want to explain really quickly what what is going on with this board of peace, kind of the mechanics of it, which is um they they signed the documents and the charter for this on January the 22nd of this year at Davos. So again, I want to because there are a lot of people out there that this has been one of the most difficult things I think we've had to confront, which is Trump won and therefore they think that the globalist lost and the UN lost and

the WF uh is over and some, you know, it got it was great branding because somehow um people thought America first and our sovereignty was going to be protected and so on and so forth and we're going to get our way get ourselves out of these organizations only to find that this new board of peace was signed and announced at Davos like it was a product launch for a tech company. It's it's kind of an interesting interesting way they went about it. So they signed the most brazen war profitering charter in American history at the World Economic Forum in front of press in you know it literally was a photo op. And so here's the structure of this thing. So the the CEO serves for life and the

or the chairman I guess serves for life and the chairman is Donald Trump. So this isn't confined to his presidency. He literally has this position for life. He can veto any decision and he can dissolve the whole thing whenever he wants. So just so we're framing this correctly. If you want to participate in this, there's a billion dollar membership fee. No independent audit, no inspector general, but that's the that's the fee. Disputes are resolved by amicle amicable collaboration with the uh the chair as the final arbiter. Okay. It has a private army of 20,000 soldiers with a

guy by the name of Major General Jasper Jeffs. Jeffers, excuse me, commanding it. And uh so 26 countries I guess have have signed on board for this. And so just very simply you have a chair for life billiond dollar membership private army no audit and they call it a the peace board. So uh and then all right well who is who is on the board of the board of peace? So, we've got these eight people. Uh, you know, if you're not looking at the screen, uh, you know, I'll walk through at a at a high level who they are, but it's it's astonishing to me some of the names on here. Again, if if your vantage point was, you know, we're breaking free

from these global organizations. Wait, wait until you get a load of this. So, we've got Trump, we have Kushner on there. Jared Kushner is Trump's son-in-law and he now is running something called Affinity Partners where he manages billions of dollars from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar. And and for this for managing this money, he gets a $25 million a year fee. Now, I I want to point out something here which we learned shortly after we we bombed Iran. people were asking him, you know, we were kind of like, you know, when we bombed Iraq, we went through this whole, you know, yellow cake and and we had uh

colon pal in front of the UN, so on and so forth. This is not what we have here. We don't have a credible threat that they were two weeks away, Iran was two weeks away from uh enough uranium or whatever for a nuclear bomb. Uh Trump said that he based his decision based on information from Jared Kushner who has no official role with our government who is managing a fund that largely monetizes uh these reconstruction projects. So Kushner is the second person. Mark Rowan is another board member. He is the CEO of Apollo Global, which is a financial firm with $785

billion under management. Rowan's firm has valued Gaza's coastline at $50 billion and he is currently facing Epstein securities class action lawsuit right now. So, this is this is the dream team that we have. Uh we have Wickoff who is Trump's real estate partner who's turned Middle East envoy and uh his whose his son took over the company but kept dealing with the same Gulf investors that dad invested with. And so the UAE bought $500 million of World Liberty Financial 4 days before the inauguration. So Witoff, if CZ is the guy technically behind the

token USD1, Witco is actually the guy, you know, who's kind of the CEO of running that project while being the US's M East envoy. You then have Tony Blair, the Iraq War architect, who's also behind the Blair Foundation or whatever. He's one of the main guys pushing digital ID >> around the globe. I mean, I think most Trump supporters prior to the election were not fans of Tony Blair. I mean, he's been on on kind of a globalist hit list for a long time of of people that, you know, people were calling him demonic before, you know, even the Epstein files and everything else. And now here he is on board. We have Marco Rubio. We have uh a guy Gabriel um I'm

try Robert Gabriel who is deputy NSA director and uh and then we have AJ Banga who is the World Bank president. So so this is the team that we have behind the board of peace. 26 member states. Only four of the 26 are actually rated free according to the Freedom House index. France, Germany, and the UK all said no. Um, so they all said no, but these eight people said yes. These eight people on the screen right here are are the the main board members of your your board of peace. So, I don't know if you guys have anything you want to add about the structure of this team or any of these people.

I counted there's uh there's three three members of this uh the board that are on the trial commission and as as well just just a small detail I'm sure. >> Can can we go through a few of these guys Aaron? >> Absolutely. >> Okay so let's go through this. So we've got obviously most people are familiar with Marco Rubio and you know I'll tell you a little bit of a talk of Let let me do this. I have slides on some of them. So let's let me >> So yeah, let's start with Kushner. >> Okay. So you mentioned Kushner affinity partners and he's raised over three

billion mostly from Saudi from sovereign wealth funds and two billion of that three billion it's from the Saudi Arabia Pac public investment fund and it's focused on and I think this is important technology and real estate right I mean that's kind of what's going on over in that region when we talk about Gaza which I'm sure we'll get into. So, it's a perfect fit. Right now, just as of three days ago, he's trying to raise $5 billion from foreign governments and other private equity firms. And that's only the beginning. You know, that's only going to get bigger. His brother Josh Kushner, okay, who's got I think a one of the Waxner models as his wife, Les Wexner models,

he owns another firm called Drive Capital, 25 billion in asset center management. He backs major tech. He's backed by major tech companies. Instagram, Spotify, Stripe, OpenAI, Robin Hood. And I think that's a really important one because that's Vlad Tennoff. And that's and he's major problems because this goes back to you know the whole remember the whole uh you know when when when um what was it the theaters um AMC and uh what was the other one? >> GameStop. >> GameStop. Yeah, GameStop. And that's when he essentially hosed his clients, you know. Um, but this guy's a bad apple. I've watched him very closely. And um, Vlad Tennov's a bad one of the bad guy on the bad guy list for sure.

And then so he raised 10 billion of new funding already in 2026. This is Josh Kushner. Okay. And he owns 66% or 5.3 billion of the fund. He's also involved. I think we'll see this later on in the year. He's also owns Oscar Health and um and then notable backers are Henry Kravis, which is more private equity. And I think that's what we're going to get into a lot too is this thing structured long-term a lot like a private equity fund would be, right? It's a lot of non- voting rights with a lot of long-term, you know, money, long-term um structure to it. And um and so I think that's good enough for now. Bob Iger backs him. Um, and he's look this this J this uh Josh Kushner, I

mean, you remember the Kushner dad, right? He got in trouble for some real estate dealings and so forth. And I think Trump, pardon him, in Trump 1.0 if I'm not mistaken, but the this Josh Kushner hangs around with all the Wall Street crowd. I mean, he's in with the Goldman the all the Goldman Sachs CEOs, you know, u blank fine. He hangs out with all of them down in the Caribbean. So, um, just this whole Kushner thing is just it it's just bad on the surface and it's bad the deeper you dig. >> Yeah, it is. Yeah. Um, >> yeah. >> How's it sound, Aaron? Is it okay? >> Sounds fine. >> Okay, good. >> Anything, Patrick?

>> Well, yeah, it's it's a rat's nest. It really is. And we have to mention also uh Trump's other sons uh Don Jr. and Eric as well. They're in the mix with uh the um the World Liberty uh financial organization. Fact, they're kind of running it at this point, I think. >> Yeah, we we'll get to them. uh because they're also involved with with drone technology as well, which I you know just again it's it's just breathtaking what's going on here. Um but we then have we have Mark Rowan. Uh do you want to say some some I think you probably know Rowan and Apollo much better than I do. Uh Craig.

>> Yeah. Yeah. So um so he was just uh how do I phrase this? Probably the best thing is when he formed Apollo Group, he formed it with a guy named Leon Black. Okay. And Leon Black, we just found through all the Epstein, we knew that Leon Black was a bad apple a long time ago. But we found, we just found through the, you know, all resurfaced with the release of some of the Epstein files and emails that Leon Black was one of the probably one of the worst um sex offenders that were in the group. Just I mean, just terrible stuff. I mean, when you read it, it's just, you know, makes you sick. I mean, beyond sick. So, uh, Mark Rowan, his partner in this, well,

let me just finish with Leon Black. Leon Black, his son Ben Black is is in the administration as well in the Trump administration, and he's handling the Chinese negotiations. So, Trump's planning to go to China the end of the month, but that's looks like to today it was in the headlines that it might get delayed for a month. But Ben Black's handling a lot of the Chinese negotiations. Not only that, Ben Black has been put in charge of the insurance company that was put together to ensure freight going through the straight of Hormuz. So Leon Black, this bad actor, okay, and his son Ben Black is now in the administration. All right, so again, we have a lot of father-son, a lot of

father-son relationships going on here. It's definitely a theme. And then when we go to Mark Rowan, he he was he denies any involvement with but we see in the emails from 2013 to 2016 that he definitely had interaction with Epstein. And not only that, he has a background at University of Pennsylvania. He's been called a crusader against, you know, am anti-semitism. So essentially what he's doing is he's trying to he's trying to um you know this is a propaganda thing right you know he goes in you know comes in says you know University of Penn you know is a crusader you know there you know um anti-semitism anti-semitism and then what do they get they get a free

pass right they can pretty much do whatever they want and so with that kind of a mindset he's probably not one of the best guys to have on the board when you're really trying to look out for the Palestinians it just doesn't fit real well right if you're trying find a solution to Gaza and the Palestinians. It probably isn't your guy, right? >> That's pretty much it on Mark Rowan for me. >> Oh, the one other thing. Let me add one other thing to Mark Rowan. He was also in the Trump administration this time around. He was on the short list for Secretary of Treasury. So Scott Bessant is our Secretary of Treasury. Mark Rowan was also on that short list for Secretary of Treasury.

Yep. Yep. And he's facing, you know, again, this black paid Epstein $158 million. So, yeah, this this so I guess Apollo shares have dropped 15%. Um, if not more. or I haven't actually checked the update on this lately, but uh yeah, this is a this is amazingly corrupt that this is going on that you have people under investigation as a result of the Epstein files that are on the board of peace. All, you know, unre kind of unrelated, but I saw today that Bank of America just settled a a lawsuit related to their involvement with Epstein. to another another civil penalty or whatever. No one no one went

to jail. They just uh wrote a check and made it all go away, which is which is just amazing. There's there's no acknowledgement at all from the Trump administration or anyone in it that there was any wrongdoing whatsoever. And there there's almost there's zero shame whatsoever for being associated with it directly or working with people who are directly associated with it. Even if these people are actively being sued, which is just mind-boggling to me. You know, usually you try to throw somebody under the bus, they're not even throwing anybody under the bus. They're not even they're not even trying to find a scapegoat. They're just like, "Ah, this this doesn't even

exist. We're gonna ignore this Epstein thing >> altogether. >> You know, I'm blown away by this by this Apollo Group thing because I think this is one of the bad actors in the private equity space. I can guarantee these guys have done some very bad deals through the years, you know. Um but the biggest thing is I mean the fact that this administration could care less that Ben Black is you know one of the key negotiators in the you know on behalf of China which is again second largest you know economy in the world our you know major trading partner and you know that he's ensuring the ships he's in charge of the the entity that they put together to ensure the

ships that are actually going through the straight of war moves. I mean, you can't make this stuff up, you know? I mean, and the fact that nobody covers this. I mean, I watch the financial news and I'm like, is this the same Ben Black, Leon Black? And you just you really can't believe you in a country of 350 million people that this this is who we end up with is Ben Black, Leon Black's son, Mark Rowan. It's just it really is just crazy. It's just crazy. >> Yeah. Yeah, Patrick, I don't know if you have anything on uh any thing you want to add on Rowan. We'll go to Wickoff's next. Uh unless you have anything you want to add on >> No, Wood Whit is uh he needs to be covered for sure.

>> All right. Do you want Do you want to talk about Woodco? >> No. If you got some good good information, go for him. >> All right. Well, I would just say that I mean the hook here is that you know you have the Woodco family. the father negotiates the peace quote and then the son signs the deal is is kind of the model with this. So, as I said in the intro, Steve Woodco is Trump's former real estate business partner turned head of, you know, USD1 as part of World Liberty Financial and then now Middle East envoy. And, you know, he sold his $120 million stake to resolve conflicts of interest. This is, you know, people need to understand that it's the same with Lutnik. You know,

Lutnik claims that, well, you know, he's no longer the CEO of Caner Fitzgerald and therefore he has no involvement and there's no conflict of interest yet his sons run Caner Fitzgerald and directly benefit. This is a complete and total copout. the of course he's benefiting from it and of course his family is benefiting from it and you have the same situation here as well. So, so, uh, Steve is saying, "Well, hey, I'm absolved of this. I've sold my $120 million stake. Now, you can go and work with my son, Alex, who is the new CEO, and we'll just hand over all of the investors to him." But hey, there's no conflict here, right? Um, I don't even know how you begin to deal with that,

but it's so blatant on the surface, but then they can say, "Well, yeah, no, I filled out the forms. I'm not personally benefiting from it." Um, you know, this is one of the things that a lot of people aren't aware of. I mean, a lot of people aren't aware of how, you know, finance works at all, how corporations work, how offshore stuff works. But, I mean, this is the way that uh these people get to control all of this stuff while still being technically above board. It's but it's blatantly kind of uh corrupt underneath. And so, uh, World Liberty Financial is run by his son, Zach, who runs it with the Trump's sons. The UAE bought a $500 million stake just four days before the

inauguration. Now, do you remember there are a lot of people that were saying, "Well, after Trump's first term, you know, he's really gearing up and what is it, project 2025, and they're doing all this stuff and they're being all silent behind the scenes, but they're going to come back and they're going to arrest all the bad guys and there's going to be all this justice." It turns out they're planned. They were planning, but what they were planning was nothing like what they said they were planning to do, which was, you know, throw all the bad guys in jail and drain the swamp and make America first. That none of that I I don't think any of that planning was

going on at all. But you have this $500 million investment four days before the inauguration. You had the two meme coins, Trump and Melania, the night before the inauguration. Now, I mean, it takes planning to do all this stuff. You don't just do a $500 million deal at the snap of a finger. You don't create a memecoin and launch the memecoin in 24 hours. These were plans that had been worked on for a long period of time. And as a reminder, the public has lost $4.3 billion on these Trump meme coins. So, this is what was set up. Now, of the $500 million, my understanding that the of the UAE investment, $187 million went

to the Trump family and 31 million went to the WhitF family. So, in other words, the UAE bought some of shares in World of Financial, but some of the shares weren't just the general corporate shares. They bought the the actual shares held by the Trump and Wickoff families. So, literally $187 million payoff. I actually, you know, we never could get that. There was all that um back and forth. Is Trump even a billionaire? And people were trying to fight over his tax returns. I am of the opinion that Trump has made more money uh in the last in his second term than he had net worth going into it. That that's how big I think this actually is. So So that's what you have. So Dan So

dad sells his steak to look clean. Son takes over. Keeps the same deals going. Conflict of interest didn't disappear. they just, you know, changed the first name. And so that's that's essentially what I have on the woodcon. I'm sure there's a lot more, but that's on the surface, at least uh what I know about it. >> Yeah. Just one quick thing. >> Go ahead, Patrick. >> Well, this family has been uh friendly with the Trump organization for years and years. They're they're like I wouldn't say Blood Brothers, but they're very very close and they've participated in many deals over the years. The fact that Wickoff is even in the in the scene tells you how close he was and that's

almost uh he you you could almost add him in into like the the nepot nepotism charge at this point. So and w with his sons as well. Um, so this is a very tight tight-knit group of people running this company, World Fin World Liberty Financial. >> Yeah. Well, and you know, we can't forget that Wickoff and Kushner are negotiating both the Gaza deal and the Ukraine Russian war. And I don't think those things are disconnected. And when we look at the Ukraine Russian war, there was a recording that was leaked of Whitov sort of backdooring a deal where, you know, he was telling Russia how to negotiate a

deal with the US. We don't know I don't know the details on all of that, but um but it's definitely out there and it was in the news for a while. So, um there's I guess the thing that takeaway on this is there's there's clearly a um well, not only that, there was an interview and I most people have probably seen it. If not, it's pretty easy to find. You can find it on X or anywhere and you can just look up uh uh Steve Wickoff and Jared Kushner. I think it was even on 60 Minutes if I'm not mistaken where they were asked you know something about the stand you know the Hamas you know October 7th Tamas Israel invasion I think just a pure standown but the point I

mean I think that's pretty cut and dry but the point is Wickoff got caught calling it a master plan and Jared Kushner was very uneasy when when Wickoff said that so the point is that they had and they said it was two years that they've had this master plan in place All right. So, these are Wickoff's own words. There's a master plan here. It went on. It was well known before October 7th, right? The, you know, the Israel Hamas situation. And he said it, you know, and Jared Kushner was very uneasy. Like, those were the quiet words, pal. You don't say those things out loud. And it didn't really matter because there's no there's no punishment, there's no penalty, there's

no retribution, there's no nothing. >> Yeah. Exact. Well, exactly. And and when we get into into this on the um Gaza situation, so the Gaza executive board has 11 members. Four of them are board members from uh the board of peace. So Kushner, Rowan, Wickoff, and Blair all sit on the main executive board and on the Gaza executive board. So they control the governance layer and the operational layer. And they're calling it a technocratic form of government. This isn't our like we're not it's not us saying, "Hey, look, this looks like technocracy." They're calling it a technocracy. They're not hiding

from it. They're actually um putting that forward as a feature. So, uh I'll get to that actually in a in a couple of slides. This is just this one is just kind of the to show h how uh heavily involved the board of peace is. uh these four players are with the Gaza reconstruction and just you know as as you were saying uh Craig you know the situation here you know did they bring about October the 7th and just as a reminder what's gone on in Gaza 72,000 killed 83 thou uh percent destroyed and you have 2.3 million people displaced so the actual carnage uh in Gaza is is absolutely

devastating you're looking at 92% of the housing stock is gone. In fact, I should have put some P. I mean, there's this image, but this this is obviously it's a generated image, but frankly, it's I probably should just put a real image of of what Gaza looks like. 97% of schools hit. 462 out of 564 schools hit directly in Gaza. 60% of hospitals are nonfunctional. 100% have been displaced. That's a 19-year blockade. The UN has called it the world's largest open air prison. Um, you have Amnesty International saying there's sufficient evidence of genocide. So, you know, when you destroy 83% of a

city's buildings, 92% of its housing, 97% of its schools, that's not war, right? That's that's a demolition. Why would you why would you bomb all of these schools, right? Right. I mean, again, this isn't a military operation. This is a complete and total leveling of the area. So, you know, that's that's evident by again just the the physical carnage to the place. So, now we get into the the technocratic rebuilding of it. So, this is the uh fascinating thing that should be on people's radar. They're calling it Project Sunrise. So this is the name of the project to rebuild Gaza.

It is a $112 billion 20-year road map driven by Kushner and Witco. They are calling it the Middle East Riviera. They're proposing 180 skyscrapers, data centers, an AI powered smart grid. They are actually calling for this to be structured with AI powered smart cities. And their goal is that by the end of year 10, 70% of Gaza's coastline will be monetized. So when we're talking technocracy, we're talking biometric surveillance. Again, this is their plan, not anybody even, you know, even projecting what this

might mean. This is the actual plan. Every resident must register with biometric documentation through Kogat, which is Israel's military coordination body. There is, this is critically important, a US dollar peg stable coin with every transaction on the blockchain fully trackable. And it's my understanding that what they're actually trying to do is make USD1, the Trump family stable coin that Wickoff controls. They want that to be this digital currency. They want that to be the US dollar. But understand, they're describing it that the money should be trackable. If you wanted any

evidence as to whether the Genius Act or these government regulated stable coins are backdoor CBDC's, this is it. This application of it shows you exactly how it's going to work. This dollarbacked stable coin that can be tracked tied into biometric surveillance that is tied into Israel's military coordination body. all tied into smart cities and an AI surveillance grid. This is it. Like this is the model reconstruction project for technocracy. So I'll say a few more things about this. If you owned property, you get a

digital token. That token is exchangeable for redevelopment rights, relocation abroad in a future apartment. So you can swap your ancestral home for a digital coupon or leave the country. They're they're trying to present this as a voluntary relocation of 2.3 million people as opposed to a you know whatever's left from the genocide turned into you know forced people kicked out of their out of their area. Uh you have Palunteer and Oracle in the equation here. So a leak draft shows a single operational spine for digital governance and defense, a unified civil registry, digital ID platform and centralized border

management. Eurommed monitor called it an emerging instrument of silent genocide. So um so that project in Saudi Arabia NEOM costs $2 trillion and Saudi Arabia can't find enough workers. Gaza cost $12 billion and the demolition is already done. So this is this is how you apply a technocratic blueprint to a captive population. And if it works here, if they can make that work, then they can make it work anywhere, which is what I think is going on with, you know, some of the other places that we're targeting all around the world. So, I don't know if you guys have anything else that you want to add to this Project Sunrise, but but man, I'll tell you that that to me,

this is everything that we've been talking about. if you can show uh some of the slides possibly. Um on project uh sunrise there was a like a slide deck. >> Yeah. Let me see if I can find it. >> Okay. Have you done much Patrick yet with the IMAC, the India Middle East Europe Economic Corridor? Have you studied that at all yet? >> Yes. Okay. >> On my It's on my radar for sure. >> Okay, good. Maybe we can get into that a little bit later because I think that ties right into all of this. >> It does. Totally. It's all about It's all about trade has

been uh trade trade trade from the get-go in my opinion. and what's what's happening with not not just Trump per se, but um all of the trade um corridors are being messed with around the world and they're be they're being reconstructed. >> Yeah. >> In odd places. So uh th this this means that there could be a a tectonic shift on global trade in the next two or three years. >> And do you think Patrick that this ties in at all with trilateral commission the structure of that? You've kind of got

east west and then you've got this is another leg of that. Well, >> you think that do you think this has been in the works for a while as part of the trilateral? >> Well, absolutely. You know, the trilateral commission, they have members seated on the on the board of peace as well as the Gaga Gaza board. So, they're all over the place. They're they're in world politics. We see Larry Frink is a member, for instance, of the trilateral commission. uh Eric Schmidt the in Washington DC now the head of former head of Google we have lot lots of people sitting in powerful positions that are members of the trial commission this was their their their game plan from the get-go was to create a new

international economic order well duh this is the new economic order is forming right before our eyes in my opinion and the business the the there there's no other country in the world uh that they could create that that they could try to create um a technocracy a technate from scratch that that's called a green field approach where there's nothing growing but just grass literally I guess um this is the only place they could do it in Gaza and whether Trump was uh just an opportunist opportunist. He saw it

coming. He jumped on it. Maybe that's it. Who knows? But uh this business of World Liberty Financial, that was not in his in his radar at all in in uh like summer 2024. This has been new since then, I think. And one of the things that drove that, by the way, I think was when when Trump got his organizations got debanked. And you might remember that that they were they really the the headlines went out. Trump's de debanked and he's going to going to be out of business, can't make payroll, uh that sort of stuff.

They said the the family probably had a a meeting. I I'm spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe speculating here, but I spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe spe I think they have a had a meeting where they had to where they said we can't let that ever happen again to us because we're worldwide de developers and all properties around like all around the world actually. And um they can't be held hostage to bankers like who you know because everything they do is based on borrowed money. Now they're looking at creating an assetbased system that that won't depend on borrowed money at all.

What does this mean for the banking system? Well, the banking system is going to have to make some big adjustments because all money is created right now by the issuance of debt. If that dries up and they they go to assetbased financing with tokenization, well, that changes the nature of the game, the economic game for sure. So at this point um the the the plan in Gaza is controlled exclusively by this group of people starting with Donald Trump with his sons with his financial company

with the governance board um and the architecture like Project Sunrise, the architecture that's controlled by Jared. Um, and laid on top of that is of course the Abraham Accord that was originally engineered by uh Jar Kush Kushner himself. So this this this is um this is beyond nepotism at that point. This is a a cartel app. They're they're appearing as a cartel to get every single aspect of life and whatever

every whatever is going to happen economically under their thumb in Gaza. And at this point, it looks like they're going to be able to do it if it if it proceeds the way it is now. you and you know we know that Trump is he didn't form the board of peace as the president of the United States. This has nothing to do with him as a president. This has never happened in the history of the world by the way in our in our country where a president did this. A lot of people are saying he can't do that. Just absolutely illegal. But he's done it. And he say well I'm I'm King Trump. I'll do whatever I want to do. Well, he didn't do it as president. So, he's he's he has another

entity, another column of influence in the world that has nothing to do with the United States. If anybody barks now, well, that's not making uh not making America great. Well, it has nothing to do with America. He's not doing it as an American. He's doing it as Donald Trump with all his his boys and his friends um exercising what whatever they want to do. on this population and they're creating they're creating a technate are do the rulers do do the arch technocrats in Washington DC go along with that do you think where where's their involvement all these people who who crafted all this crypto policies and

regulations in in in last year where are they they're hiding out right now they're not saying anything. I think we need to call them out honestly because these people, they've been pushing for this. They've never had a country where they could just say, "We're going to create a tech date." Like Elon Musk wanted to do on Mars, by the way, when he said, "I'm going to colonize Mars and I'm going to make it a technocracy." Flat out. He said that. So, this is like Mars. It's like a a sub subseet of Mars right now in Gaza. It's an opportunity time for them to ex to to move to create this experiment large experiment on a population.

I'm that need services obviously, but they're not going to get them the way that they think. So here here we are with this. This this is it's it's a it's a tangled web at this point for sure. But we've been talking about technocracy >> and technocracy is where is it's where actually it's this is exactly where it's at. The formation of a new economic system in the world. It will be based on asset tokens tokenization not on the issuance of debt. What does this mean for the rest of the world and for us? Well, it's not good. This is basically what Klaus Schwab said just a few years ago. You'll own nothing by 202030

2030. What does that mean? Well, tokenization has the ability now to make sure you'll never own anything because you can't you'll never get the the tokens together to say that's my property or whatever. And the title will not be held by you. Maybe you rent the property, but you're not going to own it. So, this has farreaching consequences in my opinion. >> I wasn't able to find the presentation. Is it was the I is the presentation actually available the full >> It is. And you know, let me uh let me look here on um technocracy news. I put one slide up on

technocracy news. Let's see if I can find Oh, yeah. Uh, look on technocracy news for the article called the GA the Gaza Gambit and I don't know if you have a I think I gave you a login for the website. >> No, I'm I'm a member. I've got a log I've got a >> Yeah. Okay. So, you find the article there and one the lead picture is like the the the first picture in the slide deck. >> All right. Let me see. called the Gaza Gambit. Can you see that article? >> I do. Let me um >> Yeah. >> Well, let me add one thing to that real quickly. So, you know, I I think we would all like to hope that this was a

result of, you know, being debanked and you say, "Okay, well, what are we going to do to counter that?" But the problem with that is this, that, you know, we obviously have Wickoff saying it was a master plan going back into October 7th, right? you know, then we have uh Netanyahu n within 90 days of the invasion, you know, the the whole Hamas Israel deal. They he announces this thing called IMC, right? That's at India, Middle East, Europe corridor. And remember by 2027 I think India just passed China as the most po as the most populist country by 2027 it's going to be the economic it's going to be second probably third

but moving towards second largest economic powerhouse and the point of this thing is that you know this the way to think about this is you had bricks right Brazil Russia India China South Africa and that got a lot of fanfare, right? It was, you know, this fear that the world reserve currency, the dollar, is going to be displaced and it's going to be displaced by this bricks, right? All these countries are going to get together. They're going to back it with gold and silver, right? And this whole concept. And I never bought into that because it was too it was too hyped. This isn't being hyped at all. And this IMC, I think, is actually the power play that leads to stablecoin,

which leads to tokenization. And here's why. Because Netanyahu announced this IMAC like within 90 days before the Israel Hamas invasion. And guess where this thing terminates? It starts in India. It goes through Saudi Arabia. Okay? And it's a combination of data lines, pipelines, hydrogen pipelines, oil lines, shipping, the whole deal, right? So that way it's not just shipping, it's everything. And guess where it terminates? It terminates in Hifa. the port in Gaza. Now, there's a lot more to that, right? But this is not an accident that Gaza has been leveled, you know what I mean? And that they're reconstructing this, not only from a termination point because once

they get to that point, they can distribute stuff into Europe out of Hifa, you know, and um so I think this isn't an accident. This is truly like Wickoff said, a master plan. I mean, this is not something you think up in three to four years, right? This is that you're talking about watching the population of India and and not only that during the World Economic Forum, Alex Stub, okay, who is the prime minister, I think president, he's the president of Finland. He did a long talk and he talked about his relationship with Trump, right? Their golfing buddies, everything else. And he called this out. He he I mean he spent 10 minutes of a 30-minute presentation

talking about the future of India. So the world leaders know that India is they're positioning for this right and this is a displacement of bricks you know this is a displacement of the olders if you really think about it you know because you're going to need these anyway we're opening up tons of cans of worms here I'll let show I'll show sunrise I >> I have the I have the image up I have the article up So everyone can see the uh this is the actual image one of the slides I guess from the this is supposed to be a 32page

presentation on this uh Gaza project. So I mean this is this is the actual plan here. Look at this. You know I thought I saw something like six to eight AI powered smart cities. I mean this is this is it. >> Yeah. Is is six cities within the area. They'll bas basically be like uh 15-minute cities. You'll have to have permission to go outside of your city. So everything will be very highly controlled and all your service will be contained in that city whatever you need. So this is a obviously a grand grand

dealio's plan. Not one thing has been been built yet, but their their idea is to take all the land, all the beach beachfront property and tokenize it and sell it to all investors around the world to raise money to to re rebuild everything. And then as every building is constructed, it'll be tokenized as well. And then all of the revenue screen streams out of those off those buildings, they'll that'll that that'll be tokenized as well. So is will every will anything in Gaza not be tokenized? I don't think so. That's the plan. There'll be no cash.

There'll be no way to conduct business outside of your digital wallet. >> Yep. Yep. >> And if you don't like it, that's your problem. You leave. Maybe you can take a by bow offer and go somewhere else out out of the country. >> That is literally the proposal. So if you already own property, you actually don't get your property back. You get a digital token. And all you can do with that token, you know, you can use it for redevelopment rights, for relocation abroad or for a future apartment. And I thought I read somewhere they have, you know, 1750 square foot apartments. I mean, they've got the whole thing all, you know, very well mapped out as to I

mean, this is a centrally planned technocratic state. Um, so this is happening and and they want to use a stable coin, a Genius Act certified stable coin, which is going to likely be USD1. So this this is happening right now and and I can see them wanting to do that in Iran, right? If they could anywhere. I think I think this is a good connection that we could make to Iran at this point because um well we I we need to be careful I suppose to to speculate but the fact that the Gaza plan has been revealed fully with the border of peace etc. Uh this is this is the new topic of

my my new book. I'm just going to release it soon called you Will Own Nothing. The economic the new the new uh uh economics of technocracy. um with with regard to Iran. Now, some people are have said written about people close to Trump that has said his his final decision to bomb Iran was outside of the norm that the military and intelligence communities

were advising him. I'm just saying. I'm not I'm not speculate on that. Several people have reported this. >> So that means you have somebody who has a financial interest in a place like Gaza. He and by the way, he'll make trillions of dollars off this. This is not jump. He he will stand to be the major recipient of trillions of dollars off of Gaza and the corridor as well if he's successful. So he has dollar signs in his eyes or tokens on his on his USD1 in his eyes. I don't know what what we call it at this point. Tokens. Um who has the ability to declare war on

another nation as scurly as they are. I mean it's it's a horrible nation run by, you know, idiots who just want to oppress everybody in sight. That but that aside, he has the ability unilaterally to declare war on a country who will potentially benefit him to the tune of trillions of dollars. If they can then roll over what they've started, the the template that they've formed in Gaza, if they can roll that over on Iran, just think of the possibilities. Talk about beachfront property. This would be this would be the coup of the century, the millennial actually.

So what I'm trying to pull up right now, last I checked, you know, we've spent over $20 billion. And I say us, the taxpayers have already spent $20 billion. I I I'm seeing now that at least a couple of hundred uh American troops have been injured or or killed so far. And you know, Trump is they're talking about how, oh, this could last six months or or whatever. Well, if if their objective isn't, you know, it rem necessarily just removing the regime, but literally as with Gaza, leveling the place so that they can go in and do a reconstruction project, right? Because it wouldn't be just enough. There's no point in just going in and being targeted and strategic. If your idea behind this is

as a reconstruction project, you actually want to level everything. And it certainly seems like they are positioning themselves for that. I mean, now we have, you know, talk about 5,000 boots on the ground and we're moving more and more and more assets there. this this all has a different look and feel to it if you're framing it and looking at it from a we you know need to demolish this before we can do a reconstruction. And so they're literally getting the taxpayers to pay for it with their dollars and they're getting troops to pay for it with their lives for reconstruction project. >> Yeah. And it's not likely at this point that >> Iran will be flipped in into some other

form of government. Maybe maybe a government less oppressive if that's possible. Uh like maybe how the the government in Saudi maybe the UAE cutter they're all repressive up to a point but they don't hammer everybody every day. And so the people have some some modicum of freedom, I suppose. Not not really, but you get the point. Uh there's there's degrees of Islam. And we have to figure for sure that that the the Shiite Muslims that lived in Iran, they're hated by all the other Islamic countries around. So at this point, the type of government

likely will be set up will be an Islamic government of a of the Sunni version of Islam. And if that happens, the reason I'm mentioning this is if that happens, you'll see another flood of Islamic money coming into USD1. Trump's uh financial uh World Liberty Financial Company that's already owned by 50% by the chic uh from uh the UAE. He that's another story. But at this point, Trump has has um decided that Islam is a

perfect uh setup for an assetbased system and he has no problem with the way those countries are being run. There's no freedom at all really any of them. But he's cozying up to them and saying, "Hey, we can do business here. I'll build hotels for you or whatever. You give me money and we'll be happy going down the road together. So if if somehow I Iran goes away from Shir Shiite Muslim uh ideology and can be tamed down to accept another form of the Sunni

flavor, the team would all be on board at that point. This really bothers me that 1.8 million billion people on the fa face of the planet are Muslim. They're all beholden to Islamic finances because they can't they they can't debt is outlawed for them. They can't have any debt at all. There's no no debt in the system at all. They're they're a assetbased economic system. This is why they've been hot and heavy going after this the fintech world for a long time. I was I scratched my head earlier and like few years ago what what do they

care about fintech for Pete's sake? Well, now you understand why. I think because the this the asset tokenization that suits them perfectly. So, you know, Trump is is bringing he's merging his operations with the Islamic world, bringing them into our world, the Western world through tokenization. This is, in my opinion, this is totally dangerous. It doesn't it takes nothing into account of what the the disastrous effects of financial jet would be on the rest of America or the rest of the

world, Western world. Um it's it's not not a scenario that I like at all. But at this point there's there there will be no um well Gaza will be an experiment for technocracy creating a technate. The form of governance for a technate is authoritarian by nature. That's exactly what happened in in China for instance to the extent that it ever got stuck at all in in uh Russia. same thing. Tech technocracy can't stand a representative political system where the people are res represented. They

hate that. So whatever whatever kind of religious system will be in Gaza, it'll be probably still Muslims of some flavor. If you want to practice that, they say, "Oh, you go do that, but you better not shoot anybody over it." when you bring up a key point I think Patrick is that you know the world the western world right coming out of World War I, World War II and you know you and I were discussing just briefly the great book by Anthony Sutton talking about FDR you know and how that power wealth and power transfer was set up you know the central US central bank was in place US t taxation was in place all you needed were a couple wars to move the you know the technology move the money move the

financial capital New York. What do you think we're doing now? As the dollar gets tapped out, right? And the Western world's a wash in debt. Where's the best place to set up shop? A place where there isn't a lot of debt. >> And where where are we going? A place that doesn't have a lot of debt. >> Yeah. >> And as you crash all the other economies, they'll go to universal basic income. They don't have a choice if you already have the groundwork laid on this. It's already all in place, right? The rails are all in place. I think there's a good a good case to be made that the financial system or the financial center of the world eventually will be based somewhere in the Middle

East. I won't say now now who who it would be but you can see this is the direction it's going for instance um in London right now London is has always been considered the financial capital of the world it's been run o run over like a steamroller with a steamroller uh with Islamic finance so there they've uh they've s succumbed alto together I think in in London and I'm talking the city of London, not just London proper. >> Well, and you know, we can't forget what the World Economic Forum said. You know, there won't be one financial capital, there will be multiple. And so maybe

this goes back to that trilateral commission and you would know better than I would on that because you've spent a lot of years studying that. Do you think there's remnants of that that that that you know that backbone of the trilateral commission working its way through this whole thing even though it's being renamed you know what I mean as a board of peace not the United Nations not this not that but it's this the general same framework right it's you know Rockefeller control versus maybe a new control or something right they're taking the same playbook modifying it I don't know I mean could we have multiple maybe one in Asia one in the Middle East and one in the West, you know, something

like that. Or is it just going to be maybe it has to be led by the Middle East because they don't have the debt when the West blows up. I mean, if you look at the world debt clock, there's nobody in the in the Middle East that shows up on there except um Saudi Arabia, right? Saudi Arabia has a a public debt to GDP ratio of 32%. That's one the US. We're like 120% and so are all the other Western economies. and they have an external debt to GDP of 23%. So they essentially have almost no debt, you know, and and nobody else even shows up on the radar. It just feels to me like when you're ready to blow out debt and you're ready to have a sovereign debt crisis, you go to a place

where there isn't debt and you set up shop. That's sort of what it feels like to me. >> Yep. I I would have to agree with you. I I'm not I would I wouldn't speculate to say this is going to happen, but that there's there will be a propensity for it to happen if if we really blow up in our country especially and maybe maybe the the the big banks uh like JP Morgan, Chase and City Corp, etc. Maybe those c those bank banks have enough of a beach head already in places like Dubai and the UAE and etc and Riad. They have huge financial centers there.

Maybe there's maybe that's enough for them to be relocated or colloccated in another country and just forget New York City. make make New York City basically a franchise of the of the mother ship. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. That's kind of what I feel going on. You know, when you look at history and you look at, you know, I like I told you the other day, I refer back to Anthony Sutton's book on FDR all the time because, you know, you you have to think about how they've thought in the past. You know, I mean, you know, >> we could, you know, we could go tear that book apart and go through that thing over and over again, but you don't realize that the Roosevelts, there's a

whole story behind the Roosevelts that goes deep. I mean, it's very, very deep. >> And and this is a lot like, you know, these regimes, you know, like a Trump Wickoff. I mean, it feels very similar to me. You know, you had this Roosevelt Empire that was built, you know, from Teddy to FDR to all the cousins and relatives. It just feels eerily similar to me, Patrick. I don't know if you I don't know if you remember that book well enough to comment on that or not. >> Oh, a lot. And all all I can say at this point, it was it was historic when he wrote it. It was precedent when he wrote it, for sure. But today, the dollar is over. It's it's dead men walking at this point

and all the things that are related to the dollar and other paper currencies around the world that are all based on debt like the issue of issuance of debt to survive. This system is over. It's a stinking hulk at this point. And they they're throwing it all to the wind in favor of a new economic system. This is this is what I've been talking about for a long time. I can't process honestly I can't process in is in in my mind at one time because it's so big. I just can't put put my my head around it. The dollar is over and other currencies as well. But the in our country the dollar is is going to be toast at some point. The and the the the

the thing that started with the the creature from Jackal Island. I'm going to talk to Ed about this I think in the future just to see what he what he thinks. I think that that creature now is all all but dead. This is what this is what um this is what David Rockefeller saw in 1973 when he teamed up with Zabna Brazinski to resuscitate technocracy under the the label the new international economic order. I think he saw a vision. I I'm not saying he had a vision, but I'm I think he he caught caught the picture of a stinking hulk

of monetary goo being swept away with a tsunami at some point in time. That's why he positioned himself to get his hands on the resources directly >> in the world. >> OPEC. >> Yep. And that's when Nixon was setting up put on it. The tokenization scheme seems to fit. >> And I'll think back one one thought. Why was Epstein in the middle of this all of this in the first place? Epstein w was a he appealed to the trilateral commission membership. He was a member of the trilateral commission.

You say, "Well, he Why would they want a sex pervert?" They didn't want that. That wasn't it at all. I I don't think. But we've talked already how Epstein was at the nexus of all this crypto nonsense in the first place. He seated so many so so many of these these concepts. Now it's matured. Now it's it's morphed a little bit. Now you have assetbased uh uh token tokenization all over the place. That wasn't in view initially but is now. So the trilateral commission was instrumental in two things. Creating a new financial system that could sit on top of the

resource base of the world. And secondly, how do you get how do you get get rid of the the leftover carcass of the old system? Does that make sense? >> Yeah. You tokenize it. >> So, so this is this is why despite the fact that we're in the middle of, you know, potentially World War I and we're in the middle of a government shutdown, the government is so adamant about pushing the Clarity Act. This because, you know, you have to ask yourself, why would that be a priority? And I know at least in my feed, I mean, this is something that has the administration administration's direct involvement from the top down. They are aggressively trying to push this. Now, by the way,

the weather today and everything else, I guess my understanding is if this doesn't get done in April, this might actually get pushed off this year, which I will tell you, we want to have happen. If you want to slow down technocracy, then stalling the Clarity Act is absolutely critical. It's the one of the most important things that we can do to buy more time. But it does make a lot more sense and and again to me because I've been focused on this issue for three and a half years and was blindsided by the Genius Act and the Clarity Act. And now as more and more of these pieces uh come into into view, we can see exactly what it is they're trying to do and exactly why it is so important. So,

um, this is absolutely critical what's going on. And there's there's no doubt about it. There's no doubt about there's no guesswork here. They're trying to use USD1. They are they're trying to put in place tokenization. They've said it explicitly with what's going on with with in Gaza and and this is everything. Now, Epstein, you know, was involved in multiple of the stable coin projects. he was involved in funding the US direct CBDC project, but there were also email exchanges where he was talking about trying to build a Sharia law compliant digital token. So, as you dig deeper into uh into all of this, then that makes more I mean, I've got to go back and look through I'm not I'm not done

with the Epstein files. Part of the problem is as you search this stuff, you know, three and a half million pages is tough to go through and then there's the OCR process and then all these weird character, all these weird characters. So, for instance, if you search for bit spacecoin, you get different results than bitcoin all one word. And so then, you know, it you get it's amazing the kind of additional information you can get just trying different combinations of of of search terms. And so um but yeah, I think you know you're right when with Epstein being part of the trilateral commission and direct involvement with Rockefeller and everything else and actually you know

managing money on behalf of the Rockefellers, this makes more and more sense and it makes more and more sense why he was referred to as Larry Summers is Mr. Money. >> Well, and and you know Larry Summers and then don't forget Mark Rowan could have been Secretary of State. You know what I mean? Like it it he's another Larry Summers in the making. You know what I mean? And he could have been Secretary of State. Instead, he finds his way onto the Board of Peace. You know what I mean? Like it it there's no difference really between Mark Gran and Larry Summers. I mean, at least in terms of, you know, right? I mean, the positioning that they both could have had. Um, you know, what

we don't know is behind the scenes who got black who's been blackmailed more. But we do know Mark Rowan had interaction with Epstein and obviously we know Larry Summers had interaction with Epstein and they were and they were both sec you know one was secretary of the secret I'm sorry the secretary of treasury secretary of treasury that's what I meant to say and um I don't know it just feels like you just they're plugandplay right it's like okay we got this guy plug him in you know we own him we've got him blackmailed part part of moving the process forward you know wherever they're at in the, you know, in the process. Does that make sense? >> Until Epstein came on the scene for the Trilata

Commission, I've never I've never seen anybody on the Trilatera Commission at that up until that point who was a financial guy for one, but he was a math genius. in on top of that and they never had somebody that was that techsavvy to make this whole system work. I don't I can't I can't imagine anybody else on the trial commission at that point who could have done what he did for to to birth the crypto industry.

We'll never know because, you know, well, he's gone, I guess. Maybe maybe he's maybe he's on another Caribbean island thumbming his nose at all of us. Who knows? But but it doesn't matter at this point. He's out of the picture. But he the the dirty work he did for the Trilato Commission, it wasn't it wasn't blackmail. It was the all the financial stuff that they that he did for them to set the system up. And now you see all of a sudden they're collecting the money. By the way, AJ Bang Bangan Banga, the head of World Bank, this is this is one of those positions that's been dominated by the Trilateral

Commission forever since 1976 and there's been a couple that weren't associated with the Trouta Commission, but but Banga is okay. So, Bangga has he has engineered a bank account, a private well, it's not private bank account, but he he's set up a bank account on behalf of Trump and World Liberty Financial to receive the money that Trump as president said that they're going to get, the 10 billion dollars that he pledged of our tax money B and other other money like the the $1

billion fee to join the the peace board. AJ Banga has ready to receive that money and Trump will be in charge of that money how however it's going to be distributed. who who has this kind of a relationship with the president of the World Bank that you call him up and say, "Hey, hey, AJ, uh, can you set up a little slut fund for me? I want to do some business out here." You know, whatever. Who does that? This is crazy. Unfortunately, there's been no money put in that account. As far as I can tell so far, I don't think we'll see a register on it necessarily, but I think no no no money

has gone out of our treasury yet, but this this is supposed to be the bank account that will fund all the development in Gaza. >> Yeah. I >> Well, just just that little >> Can I just add something real quick, Erin? >> Yeah. Okay, hang on to that thought. In 2019, just this is hilarious, right? Donald Trump was he considered nominating his daughter, Ivanka Trump, head of the World Bank. I don't know if you remember that or not, but I just had I just had to throw that in there. Go ahead, Erin. That's it. >> Well, I was just going to say the 10 billion hasn't been funded yet. And in in theory, it requires congressional approval.

>> Yes. >> And you know, look, again, at this point, I mean, I you know, we have no speed bumps whatsoever. We just have technocracy with absolutely zero resistance. It it almost seems like, you know, the mid the mid the midterms couldn't come fast enough. But nevertheless, people need to become aware of what's actually going on here. I mean, the war is a travesty in light of the fact that there was no smoking gun. Trump has already said Kushner was one of the main reasons that he decided to do it. And this $10 billion should never make its way to the board of peace. Again, the idea that our taxpayer money and and blood and so forth is being used to finance and create the circumstances

for a technocracy that America doesn't benefit from at all. It uh should be, you know, we've got to figure out how to how to tell that story so that everybody understands what's happening here. Yes, we do. Yes, we do. And by the way, when when Trump signed the executive order um authorizing the board of peace and the the the money the 10 billion dollars that was pledged, he's he made a big deal to announce the whoa, we're pledging 10 B billion bucks. Um the the diplomatic side of that EO supposedly put the board of peace under

the umbrella that other or uh uh organizations enjoy like uh with the um with the United Nations for instance, the World Health Organization, even almost the the bank fin international settlements, they're a tier above of what Trump has done, but he's Trump has um surrounded any activity of his as a as as a private person. He's this is complicated. He's president of the United States. He he can sign an executive order to grant immunity basically for all these people who are going to be working with him, including him

in Washington DC. This this is incredible. They have they they can't be touched by the IRS. They can't be touched by the State Department. They can't be touched for from any uh authorities like the FBI, etc. in our country unless they commit a capital crime like killing somebody, then they can get arrested. But otherwise, they they're they're basically they'll be uh is a term they'll be without portfolio. You can't touch them. Leave him alone. Y >> it's I I don't know. I didn't even It It get Well, you know what? It gets worse. So, I was going to

Even beyond Project Sunrise, we have now the Sun's Drone Empire. So, on March the 1st, Trump began bombing Iran. March the 9th, Eric and Don Jr. announced they're merging a golf course company with Power US Corporation, a drone manufacturer. Ticker symbol PUSA. So, so there's a $ 1.1 billion Pentagon drone dominance initiative earmarked for Americanmade drones. The Sun's companies are positioned to profit off of this. But that's not all. There's a full defense portfolio

here. So, not just this Power SP USA. The Trump Suns have built an entire defense portfolio. There's a company called X10, a 1.5 billion dollar Israeli AI attack drone company. I guess Eric Trump is involved with that. These are some of the same drones being used in Iran right now. There's unusual machines. Trump Jr. is on the advisory board of this consumer and commercial drones. And Craig Craig and I talk about this one a lot because it's in his backyard. Andel um has a $60 billion valuation. Trump Junior's firm 1789 Capital has a major stake in this and they're positioning themselves and we talked about this on another episode, but for the the Golden

Dome, the next generation missile defense system. So, um, at least two Trump Junior back companies got contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars from the Pentagon in 2025. We're not even talking about this year. So, father starts the war, sons own the weapons companies in addition to everything that we've talked about from a uh reconstruction and and pushing technocracy perspective. And it does and it doesn't it doesn't end there. I just saw on my feed earlier today that I guess uh Trump's putting JD Vance in charge of fraud. Um, you know, I I I mean, I mean, I joke,

you know, presumably to to be in charge of of executing it, not stopping it. But I guess I guess the new thing now is J JD Vance is is in charge of that. >> And JD Vance has tons of investments in uh he's got his whole technocracy portfolio. He has um $250,000 in a VC fund that he helped launch. Um that includes four companies that are now getting uh Trump pants administration contracts. We have Hermus, a hypersonic aircraft that has a $9.36 million DoD contract. And again, you have JD Vance involved with that. And um I don't know if you knew this, vice presidents apparently are exempt from federal ethics divevestature requirements.

>> So >> that's handy. >> That's that's convenient. May maybe he won't run after maybe he won't run after all. Maybe he'll run maybe he'll let Marco Rubio run for at the top of the ticket so he can continue to monetize. >> I mean look, Dick Cheney did a good job with that, too. I guess that explains the $1 million per year that uh that he was getting. So, so the vice president is invested in companies that are actively getting contracts from his own administration and it is legal because vice presidents are exempt. You wonder now if if if there will be enough angst by by the time the midterms are over. Maybe they'll maybe the Dems will take the House, maybe not the Senate, but I

wonder if there'll be enough uh hostility in the Rep Republican camp to in the Senate especially to actually go go through with a trial and thr uh uh throw Trump out of out of the office altogether. Um, at this point I think it would be a knee-jerk reaction to to impeach Trump if the Dems uh take take the House. I can't imagine they would not do that. >> Yeah. After that, it would go to the Senate. And if the Senate could try him or did or whatever will, um, I could see enough Republican senators crossing over

the aisle to throw him out, convict him >> because Go ahead. >> Sorry. >> Go ahead, Patrick. Well, all considering everything that we're talking about, all this is you can't even call this graft. You can't I don't know what you can call at this point. It's not it's not necessarily all illegal, but whatever is going on, it's big and it's a betrayal of the American people in my opinion all over. This is what our book was all about. Uh this one, as a matter of fact, the the final betrayal I wrote with Courtney, um if if enough people get wind of this, there's going to be huge

pressure to throw the bum out and that would leave JD Vance as president. I don't like that either. That's >> That might be worse. Yeah. Well, he will he will answer to Peter Teal. >> There's no doubt about that. >> And David Sachs and Chamath Polyhapatia and the whole group. I mean, they were just out the other day. David Sachs. I mean, talking about this Iran war. I mean, I was going to send you a clip on that, Erin. It's almost mindboggling just to sit there and listen to him, you know, because he's our part-time cryptosar. He spends half he's got a special provision. He's half the time in the White House dealing with that, but he's half the time on the outside in

Silicon Valley, you know, setting himself up. I mean, if that isn't right for betrayal, I don't know what is too, right? >> No, I mean, it's all betrayal. I mean, again, it's like, oh god, there's no conflict of interest because, you know, I handed it over and now my son controls it, but I divested myself. This is this is why I say that we we don't have a rule of law or constitution because the people that are running things don't follow any of these rules and they come up with loopholes that they get to work around. And so now we're out bombing countries and doing these reconstruction projects and funding all of these things and they may be legally covered but this

is this is the complete disintegration of the fabric of America. >> Yeah. Wow. Well, and I just back up, you know, when I again back to Anthony Sutton's book on FDR, you know, and the Roosevelts, you know, I mean, I know this sounds like it's so hundred years ago, why does that matter? I'm not even sure that election was fair back then, Patrick. You know, I read that book and based off all the facts that Anthony puts in there, I I don't think that was a fair, honest election back then. And when did the technocracy start? Right about that time. You know what I mean? the guy who wrote wrote the first it just feels to me like Trump's a construct I just you know back to the Regan era back to

Reagan and Bush what a coincidence right then you get Art Laugher starts the whole debt deficit spending you get Orisa money you go from defined benefits to defined contribution you start debt funding and equity boom that never really stops only time it has a pullback is when there's a planned false flag every time the stock market pulls back it's a false flag. There's there's no other exception. Ebola, COVID, 2008, long-term capital management, 199 1998 Asian currency crisis, probably 1987, you know, crash. I mean, I think every one of them is a and I almost think I don't know. I'm getting to the point where I don't have any alternative in my mind, but

just think that, you know, and that's a good question you bring up. you know, were the Trump and Trump family upset because they got debanked or is this just all part of a construct? You know what I mean? That's leading to this point in time where, you know, have we really how when have we had a fair election? I mean, when I want to we know that we know that Kennedy wasn't a fair election. I mean, what you know, go just go down the list. When did we I mean, Reagan I mean, maybe Reagan I don't know. I mean, it was overwhelming because he won California. That was rare. I I just don't know when we've had a fair honest election. >> Yeah. Well, we're in for more for more sea

change for sure in the future. Maybe maybe there there probably will be a time when there's no election at all. And that would be based on the technocrats idea, original idea from 1932 that there's no need for political system because they have all the science on their side and they're just going to tell us what to do. You don't need to discuss it. What what do you need politics for? This this was crazy back then and it's still crazy today. But you have people like Curtis Yarvin. That's exactly what he's saying. you just same thing. >> We need a dictator. We get get over your

f dictator phobia, guys. That's what he's saying. You know, out with the old uh Democratic RepRublic uh Republican form of government and just go directly to a a dictator, turn all the property over to the state. That's a great idea. >> Yeah. I mean, that's what he was pushing for. And and again, a lot of libertarians that that I've learned recently are buying into this. And, you know, kind of shocking uh in a way, but this is happening here in in New Hampshire. There's there's been this whole push for it's a push back against woke culture and DEI, but it's a it's it is a

reaction. And then the reaction is to make everything about merit because everything was was made not about merit was made about these other things. But but the problem is that what was lost is our inaliable rights. That that's not part of this. It's gone just to what is merit. And then merit then gets taken to the next level which is well AI is better than than human merit. And so then we go come to the logical conclusion that the best way to have decisions made is by AI. This is coming from libertarian people. >> Yeah. >> And and it's it's shocking >> uh to me to see that that's gaining

gaining traction. So we we've got our work cut out for us um not only educating people but getting grounded back to a conversation about our our rights. >> Yeah. Well, I'll tell you what. You take care of the East Coast. You take You take care of the Midwest and I'll take care of the the left coast. I'm surrounded. >> Yeah. Well, I think we're gonna we're gonna >> I got my handsful in Ohio. I got my hands full in Ohio right now. Right. Andel, Ramas, Swami, Vance. else do we have? >> Oh boy. Yeah. >> Yeah. Yeah. No, Ohio really is I when

you think about it, I mean, as we've been talking about this, Ohio's become ground zero. I mean, between uh you know, Vance funding uh excuse me, teal funding Vance out of there. And of course, it makes sense if you if you want somebody to ultimately become president, then you pick somebody from the important swing state of Ohio. And then now all of a sudden, everybody, you know, isn't there Arabore Bank there? Also, >> Arabore Bank, Peter Teal's Bank. Yep. Yep. So yeah, you you surface. Give that that time. You know, you know a rebore bank's coming. You know there's going to be headlines all give it six months to a year. You know that's going to be in the headlines. A Rebore Bank. I almost

guarantee it. >> Oh, and it'll be a major player with stable coins and asset tokenization. I guarantee that's going to be their their big sweet spot in all of this. >> Yeah. So I mean I you know what we have here one family four wars five asset classes. You've got you know the Trump sons involved with drones and weapons across four comp companies. The Trump families involved crypto via world liberty money from UAE. Vance defense VC fund with four contracts. Lutnik with tariffs and rare earth and stable coins. Kushner with Gulf billions and Gaza reconstruction. Rowan's $15 billion dollar Gaza play Wickoff real estate crypto peace negotiations. I mean

compare this to you know what was considered to be the previous worst situation which is you know Cheney with one conflict right you know one guy one company one war this is this is an entire portfolio um that that's how to me this is how big of a deal this is and and I we've got to figure out how to get this get this word out. I you know look I will say on the positive side I I think that this war has been has backfired in a in a big way. There is not the support. Usually when they do one of these conflicts there's you know initially like 80 to 90% support out of the gates. Then maybe people learn about it 10 years later and then it kind of erodess. But in this

case uh this conflict wasn't wasn't popular. I think it was pulling at like 27% or something right away. And so, you know, maybe there's a an opportunity to get people to look at what's going on here to understand the technocracy through the lens of this unpopular war. >> Yes, I would hope I would hope so. Honestly, this I'm I'm I don't know how my new book will fare. the the title is going to be a little bit ugly because we have to talk about economics. But maybe maybe the headline you will own nothing will hit people where it hurts

because this this is where it's all headed. Tecracy >> it is. And that's I've got the site own.org at for this very reason. I'm arguing that we already own nothing to a large degree just from contracts and click wrap agreements and everything else that that that's happened subtly over a couple of decades and then the the tokenization of assets which will really be linked to these contracts where we've already given away our rights. That's the that's the heart of that's the heart of the control system >> for for this technocracy. So, um, >> well, and I don't really feel like this is just a tumble weed blowing through the desert. I mean, this feels very well

like we know where this is going to be in three and four and five years, right? This isn't just an accident. We're not just fumbling along rolling down the thing. You know what I mean? Like, it's very clear that this you can see the parts and pieces put being put in place. like what what are the three what are the few things that you're really concerned with on the clarity act and what are the good things that what is there anything that good that could come out of it and what are the really bad things that could come out of it so people know because I don't think we know the genius act because it's set in stone not fully set in stone but it's pretty much set in stone right the

clarity act is still it's the STC the CFTC fighting for control over you know right the stable coin you know the digit can you just walk through that real quick. >> There's nothing actually good about it, but the way that it's being pitched as being good and the reason that they've been able to rally some of the crypto community is what they're saying is once you have these rules in place, 401ks will be able to invest in crypto. And therefore, crypto people are looking at this as, oh, my num the number is going to go up and I'm going to I'm going to make more money. that that is the sales pitch that they're using >> to attempt to get popular support. The

reality of what it it says though is that the exchanges for all of of crypto and again they've made it sound like it's a crypto bill but it's actually about any token and so it actually really means real world assets because you know the size of a crypto market and everything else pales in comparison to the size of the market for tokenizing stocks, bonds, commodities, everything that we own. And so this is going to put ownerous restrictions on exchanges, but they're going to be able to track all of your transactions in real time. They have to have the ability to construct your trade. So not just, you know, what you're doing in a moment in time, but

the ability to track how your trades interact with one another. That's part of it. Y >> to then hold that information for five years and to share that information and this is the kicker not only with multiple federal uh US federal government departments but to also share this transaction information with foreign central banks. So so that's the clarity part of of this act. Well, it's a complete surveillance system and then you add on top of that all the know your customer stuff and everything else. And so now this is literally where everything that you own becomes trackable, programmable, and sensorable. That's what it actually means. And no one's looking at it that way. It gets it

gets pushed as and the propaganda is we're going to be pro cryp the most pro- crypto nation and 401ks are going to buy this and you're going to make a lot of money. And by the way, I have another problem with that as well, which is a deeper issue that I have even with the SEC. the poor the poor people that are working uh for a living and they have their retirements put into these 401ks. They don't get to invest in companies when they're early stage. They don't get a chance to make, you know, a thousand times return on their money. They only get to invest in things after everybody else has already made their money. So in other words, if you are an employee of a

corporation and now your 401k buys Bitcoin or buys these assets, they're basically dumping on you. So the people that are already in are selling to you. >> And so I I'm I find it offensive that there are people that are excited about the fact that they're using the what I think is probably the biggest piece of surveillance legislation ever. U they're okay with that. They're okay with the surveillance in exchange for being able to dump on people that aren't able to get involved in things when it's early because of SEC regulations. So that's the that's the challenge with this. It's complex to explain because people don't know how the SEC works. And and we're

fighting against a massive machine. $200 million between the banking and crypto lobbies have has gone into crafting the bill and promoting the bill. And then you have, I think, 220 former regulators from these various uh federal agencies that are now switching sides to work on promoting the legislation. And then you have the publications themselves, even the crypto publications where when you dig into this, you find out they're owned by companies that benefit from the legislation. None of these are independent. There's no there's no such thing as independent crypto investigative journalism. That's not a that's not a thing that exists. So the So some of these lobbyists and

advisers make $2,000 an hour. So there's nobody there's nobody at the table representing uh the average citizen and there's nobody at the table representing uh privacy at all. That's not actually literally part of the of any table that anybody's at that's drafting or advocating for this legislation. This is why it's such an uphill battle because there aren't many of us talking about it and and we're flooded by hundreds of millions of dollars and fake accounts and bots and everything else on the other end. There's no money in defending the the truth on this matter. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> Exactly right. >> Wow.

>> Hey, Erin, I need I need to I need to split at this point. >> Yep. Well, thank thank you for coming on. It was great great to have you and great to have your >> great great conversation. We need to we need we need to uh you know flush this out, put it on the table for people to get it get in their their mind. I I know we don't have all the answers. We have pieces of things and uh at some point in time I think every we can put all those pieces together in a totally unified way. But this is the biggest story that will affect life in America going forward that that any anything possibly on the table including even war in

America. So this we need we need to make sure that we stay on the cutting edge of it. Don't give in. Don't get get hammered because you know you people want to get after you for you know like trolls and stuff. you know, you're an idiot sort of thing. Just don't listen to them, man. Just slough them off. >> Oh, yeah. I'm getting used to that. >> I know. >> Aren't we all? I know. It's crazy crazy world. >> Yeah. >> Well, hey, great great conversation, guys. I'll I'll bow out right now, but I'll I'll be back with you sometime sometime soon, I'm sure. >> All right. Great. Thank you for coming on. >> You bet. >> Thanks, Patrick. >> You bet.

Well, that was great. I That was unexpected, but uh always uh always incredible to have Patrick involved. And and by the way, you know, for everyone listening to this, if you haven't already bought the final betrayal, uh Patrick Wood and Courtney uh Turner wrote that. It's a phenomenal book. It's it's not a long book, but it's incredibly important. I mean, I I you know, I can't stress enough that technocracy is is the fight. It's the battleground. And I'll tell you, I gave a talk at Liberty Forum here in New Hampshire, the Free State Project. And I a lot of the people here, which you know, if you would think anybody would be cutting edge, it would be people that

actually physically moved from somewhere to uh New Hampshire and and are attending a conference in New Hampshire in the dead of winter. But a lot of people are not aware of this and I and I actually have to describe for instance the idea that uh you know Peter Teal is not a libertarian. Elon Musk is not a libertarian. They're technocrats. Techn technocracy is a political ideology. It's not about the application of technology to make things more efficient. It's an ideology. And so um we are we're further behind actually in some ways than I thought. I come to find out we've I've been talking about this stuff for three and a half years and uh my own backyard it's managed to actually seep in here

where it wasn't that nobody was pushing these kinds of concepts within this movement three and a half years ago and now there are whole initiatives that want to kind of bring this thing to to New Hampshire and they're using the the meritocracy angle to this which again to me is just a reaction to woke but it's not principled and it's certainly definely not libertarian or or pro liberty. Um, so a lot of work to be done. I I still have a few slides. I mean, some of this, you know, defense stocks are surging, so on and so forth. Okay, all that's not a surprise. RTX, who makes tomahawk missiles up 110%, so on and so forth. But, you know, I think it's interesting, and I haven't explored this

much. I'd be curious, Craig, to get your your thoughts on this, but do you what's going on in Venezuela? How might how might how might what we're talking about today fit into into Venezuela? >> Well, I think Patrick hit it pretty well earlier that, you know, from a big, you know, from a big high up p, you know, 30,000 50,000 foot view perspective. You know, you have the um the Panama Canal is in play. You know, you have the whole Caribbean seal that's in play. You know, you've got down there, you know, we've been dealing with, you know, French Guyana, you know, we've got Venezuela, Colombia talks going on there. You know, you've got obviously everything going on in Mexico.

And, you know, you were in the cot in the middle of that, right, with the cartels and all that kind of stuff. And I just think that this fits because what did Trump say? You know, he's we're not even done with Iran and he's already picking on Cuba. >> I don't know if you've seen that in the headlines, Aaron. >> Oh. Oh, yeah. He's like, "Well, we're not quite ready for Cuba yet." You know, and Cuba's got a long storyried root, long storied um uh going way back hundreds of years, right? You know, essentially, you know, when Spain came over, they would they would go into South America and they would loot South America. You know, they would basically take some up the west side of South

America and some up the east side of South America. And essentially Cuba was their rendevous point where they they were accountants and they would basically, you know, account for what they looted and then they'd put it on a ship. And somehow they must have had some accounting process where they, you know, over in Spain, you know, that they felt like, okay, we trust this person or this process, whatever it may be, this bean counting process, put it on the ship, and then they'd ship it off to Spain. And so somehow they were accounting for that. So Cuba's always had a role in that region as a kind of a, you know, I guess I would say a little bit of an oversight or an

authoritarian rule. And so with Venezuela, they've had connections with Venezuela. You know, I mean, when when we went in and extracted Maduro, who was there? It was a lot of Venezuelan, you know, activity. So I think Venezuela, you know, that from that perspective, I think that's the big picture view. I think from a lower level view, you know, the whole goal is to remember Venezuela refineses a heavy crude. You know, that's a lot of what I think Iran does as well. And there's only certain refineries around the world that can deal with that heavy crude. You know, you've got heavy crude, you've got light sweet crude. And Venezuela is one of those ones that's, you know, huge amount

of reserves, but not very many people can refine that crude, that crude oil. And so the question is, you know, who's going to move in there and, you know, spend the money to, you know, again, extract and look, the US has the technology, right? That's what essentially we brought to the Middle East in the 70s was the technology. You know, they had the oil, we brought the technology, right? And therefore, we get to slap things in, you know, OPEC and we get the dollar-based oil and everything else. But in Venezuela, we've essentially, I guess, hijacked Venezuela to some extent. And um and and that's going to lead to investment. So right now, I would say, Erin, where we're at

is we probably, you know, settled down the government. You know, it's a coup d'etat essentially, right? I don't know how else you call it anything else. We went in there, regime change, and now they're probably, you know, Chris Wright took a trip down there. He's our secretary of energy. And I would say that they're in the process of, you know, incentivizing and and pushing money into that area to either revitalize old facilities that maybe got, you know, dumped after Chavez, you know, somewhere in the Chavez to Maduro, you know, window of time. They're probably trying to get stuff back up and running. You know, I don't know what the agenda is. I don't know if this is to

offset, you know, maybe oil. I don't know if this is prepping for World War II, World War I 4, you know that because remember, you know, Germany went into Russia to get the oil. That was a big part of the reason they went in and did what they did, you know, was the energy, you know, if we have energy access to the Venezuelan energy and we control the ports and channels, you know, that that run through there. I mean, I would assume that sets us up, especially if we control the, you know, straight of Hormuz and this other stuff coming out of India, you know. So again, I think we part of it is rearranging the bricks, you know, this bricks thing, you know, and and and the Silk Road, right? China

wanted to set the Silk Road up going into Europe to feed Europe with all kinds of goods, the you know, the old Silk Road, the new Silk Road. And um and this was a major push and I don't know how that's been derailed with all of this, but I think this is part of that derailing, you know, getting access to Venezuela and controlling that and feeding investment down into there. Um, does that how's that make sense? >> I mean, I I think it makes sense. I mean, obviously we demanded that they turn over sanctioned oil and now and now money from future Venezuelan oil sales oil sales is dispersed at discretionary the US. But the thing is, again, I have to go back to there is no US interest in

any of this. Th this everything that is being done right now is being done to benefit uh the Trump family, the Ed Wickoff family, the Lutnik family, the people that are involved in the board of peace. There's nothing here that that there are no US interests here. Everything that's being done has nothing to do with America. It's just we're paying for it. This is the classic example of, you know, as I always talk about, there's no right, right versus left. It's just they manufacture division so that they can use our resources and literally use the lives of of our children to do this technocratic expansion. That's the part of this that is infuriating. And what what I struggle

with now I am seeing um a change. There are people here even in New Hampshire that were diehard Trump fans and the it's starting to crack. I think that the the truth is people are looking at this and say I and again the war thing is probably a big one. There are a lot of people who voted for Trump specifically because he said uh no M East wars. So now people who were just blind followers who no matter what Trump would say they would support it, now they're looking at this and saying, "Wait, wait, why are we doing this?" Particularly when people start talking about the draft. Um, so are people buying the, you know, it's getting to the point where the Iran is two weeks

away from a nuke when you can see, you know, video clips of Netanyahu talking about that 40 years ago. People are not buying that. And so now maybe this is a window to open this up. You know, this is complex. We've actually gone through a lot of material so far. And you know, whatever memes, I'll play a song on the way out. I played it in the beginning and I was actually working in the back. I was trying to get the music video done for it, which I will have on the way on the way out. Um, but I think I think that at some point people have to start becoming critical of Trump. And where he's had an advantage so far is he's been able to say completely conflicting

things. I mean, it doesn't even matter if you point out eight tweets where he said the exact opposite of what he's actually done and people will still support it. And that somehow they managed to spin this it must be 5D chess or trust the plan. Well, it turns out the plan was to use all of our resources to go to war so that they could monetize reconstruction projects that turn into technocracies that America doesn't doesn't benefit from at all. Apparently, that's the plan, right? Um the plan wasn't to throw the bad guys in jail. The plan was never to to to, you know, drain the swamp. And the revenge, I think a lot of people thought the combination of the shooting and

everything else, people thought that the revenge was going to be to clean everything up. And apparently the revenge is just he's going to monetize all of this at all of our expense. And that's clear. It's just how do you take all of this information and and present it in a way that people can understand? >> Well, I think one subtle thing is this. This is kind of a subtle thing that you know maybe we can develop or at least let me throw this out there and see what you think is that you know for the last let's call it you know 70 to 100 years we've been under this belief of capitalism you know and this you know trickle down type of of structure you know Reagan talked about the trickle

down you know where it's like look we're going to do these things and then it's going to trickle down everyone you know and I think we're still under that belief that you know we're down in Venezuela doing something right and this is part of capitalism and it somehow it's going to trickle down to the people of the US and I think what we're trying to draw a differentiation here is that there's no sign of that you know what I mean there's no sign that this is going to trickle down into jobs right for people in the US there's no sign this is going to you know now what it might do is keep costs of energy down so it might offset inflation you know to some extent

you know so there's little subtleties to it but I'm I think we've crossed this, you know, the Rubicon of this isn't about capitalism. This isn't the trickle down that we're so, you know, that we have ingrained in our head. You know, the US is based on capitalism. That's what's made us the biggest economy. That's what's made us, you know, 65 to 75% economy based on consumption. Why is that? Because we have all this GDP. We have all this growth and therefore it trickles down. You know, the problem is we we have immense amounts of debt. Who knows how much debt this war is going to add. You know, who knows where the money's going. you know, we just continue to do these wars and there's

never anybody sitting up there saying, "Hey, wait a minute. We can't afford this." You know, Besset, where's he, you know, with his calculator? He's never saying, "Ah, you know, this is going to get pretty expensive, Trump. This is going to cost us $2 trillion, and we don't have that." Remember, you said we were going to we were going to take in all these tariff revenues and offset that, you know, but we're not doing that. And so, I think, does that make sense, Erin? that subtle thing of like we just are under this this this spell that capitalism always comes through for us and we just assume that these things that happen are going to trickle down to us. Does that make sense?

>> Well, but this isn't capitalism. This is a very sharp distinction. What's going on right now is the board of peace is not capitalism. It is not capitalism when you take taxpayer money and form a private equity firm and use war and human lives to to then use more taxpayer money to reconstruct an area that the taxpayers don't own any part of. The US doesn't own part of the board of peace. There are no dividends. We put up the money to it, but we there there are no dividends to it. the actual economic entities that profit from this, the United States citizens are not shareholders in that at all. So, this is this I I can't be more clear about what's going on right now has nothing to

do with capitalism. None of this has anything to do with capitalism. And then we we've reached a point where there are a lot of people that don't even know the difference between cronyism and capitalism or um you know any any of these other political systems. This has nothing to do with capitalism. This is not voluntary exchange in any way, shape, or form. And I I see somebody Rachel says, "I do support Trump till you give me another alternative." The other alternative is to ditch the dollar and to exit these systems and not be co-opted by this. This isn't about picking another person to handle these issues. There's no in Trump is not doing any again what he's doing America at the

heart of any of the agenda. You can look at the legal structures. There's no benefit to the American people from this. And all you have to do is look at what he said he was going to do versus what he's doing. And are the American people benefiting from it? The dollar. Trump has added more to the deficit than he's added more than 25% of all of the debt that's ever been added have been in his five plus years. U the job market is is in the toilet. The only thing that we have is the stock market which is artificially pumped. I mean, you actually look at this to the point where he's managed to convince people that the only thing that matters is gas prices. And this is a really cynical thing,

right? Because if you actually look at inflation in a whole variety of other areas, it hasn't been all that great. But all of the memes and everything that he ever talks about, his talking point is all about gas prices. And now he's lost control of that, right? and to the point where we're now draining the strategic oil reserve, petroleum reserve, and everything else just so that he can keep up the facade of that as a metric. People know better. People are having to buy groceries. People I mean, you look at all the other statistics around defaults, home ownership, everything else. It's it's a it's a it's a ridiculous situation. So, I'm not advocating anyone else. I just

saw Rand Paul said he might run. Nobody can fix this. This is so systemically corrupt that there is no there's no walking back from this. But what what I've been arguing is that they know there's going to be a collapse. This is why we're putting in a new chairman of the Federal Reserve who was the guy literally responsible for the uh the exit. This is the job market in the toilet thanks to the COVID scam and DEI. Who's responsible for the COVID scam? Who's responsible for operation warp speed? The job market is not in trouble toilet because of DEI. People are going to be replaced by AI. That's the that those jobs aren't coming back. I I will tell you this, they're not going to

replace DEI jobs with people. They're going to replace DEI with AI. Um so, but you know, nevertheless, at some point, there's no path here and there's nobody nobody advocating to fix or address the situation that benefits the American people at all. Um, so we've got to stop believing in >> and there's a propaganda >> when there's a propaganda, you know, propaganda is powerful and the and I agree with you like that's our goal. That's our objective here is to show people that, you know, capitalism isn't functioning right, but they think that it is. I think the perception is capitalism always wins. The invisible

hand, Sam, you know, Sam Sam Smith, is that right? Sam Adam >> Adam Smith >> Adam Smith right the invisible hand just let it work it's worked for us for the last hundred years it's all this trickle down but it's that's the subtle thing the education that I think we have to do you know is to show that this isn't going in the right direction and you can watch it if you read through the headlines on the business networks you'll see you know Amazon laying off people and they don't explain like why right and you'll see another company laying off people and another company. And that's exactly what you're talking about, Aaron. The AI is replacing jobs as we speak. I mean, it it is happening

and you see it. It's very subtle, but you see it happening and that you listen for the story. There used to be a story with it. Why? Then you could get your head around it and say, "Okay, well, that'll come back in the next turn." You know, the upturn of the economy, whatever. This is different. This is not coming back. Like you, there's no story behind it. Does that make sense? There's no story behind why somebody's laying off 10,000 workers. You know what I mean? Look, we're at we're near all-time stock market highs. There's no we're not in it, you know? Like, does that make sense? Like, this is not This is different, I guess, is my point. This is different than what we've

seen over the last 40 to 50 years in our generations. >> Well, it's different. That's one arc of it that's different. But again, I would argue we do not have capitalism at all. This is not a failure. We haven't had capitalism in a long time. When I was involved with big tech in the 90s, big tech didn't have lobbyists in Washington DC. You now have venture capital firms that specifically invest in companies based on the likelihood of getting defense contracts. That was never part of what tech was all about. The idea that, you know, Google and others became part of the censorship industrial complex is something that would have been unheard of in the 90s. And so,

we've completely lost the plot. I mean, and this is true with energy and everything else. And so we we we are very much you know at best surveillance capitalism and actually if you compare the US to China there's not that much different what difference when you look at the structures of the organizations that are building AI in China they're back they have investors they're for-profit corporations I mean this is how far off the rails we are we sit here and we and we try to claim that China is communist China these these are actual corporate entities where people earn profits not any different actually at this point than having a company here that's backed by venture capital firms

that are funded by the CIA where their where their actual clients are government contractors where they violate people's rights um in order to maintain those contracts. That isn't any different than China. I don't think people realize this. There's a big gulf between I mean I've argued this. I think Trump is living in the 80s with respect to I think he backfired. I think he did not understand our uh the how our military I I think there's been this kind of like we've become the red coats where we just assume that we spend more money than everyone else therefore we're going to win. By the way, that's the same approach we're taking with AI which is we're going to have these closed

source models and what we're going to do is we're going to build more and more data centers and what happens? China comes up with open source models that actually work differently and are more effective. we've lost the the edge of of being competitive and innovating. We don't innovate. We're doing things on the basis of uh force and resting on our laurels and our past reputation and we become not competitive as a result. And as a result of becoming not competitive, we're now using force again to try to maintain our status as opposed to our our status having been originally been you could argue this, but originally been at least based on merit and you know, if nothing else, based on having a

better relative position with respect to debt coming out of World War II, but we we have we have none of that now. We have all of the debt and none of the innovation, but we still got the same ego and we're attached to the old branding. And that's that's problematic. Yep. I agree. Well, and that's the same claim I'm making, you know, with the capitalism. I mean, I think we just have this underlying belief that it always bails us out, you know, and I'm just afraid we're at the point where that's breaking and and there's no intention to fix it. That's the thing, you know. There's No, there's no responsibility out of the Secretary of Treasury, you know, at all.

I mean, there's never been a discussion. I don't know. Do you Did you ever get that clip I sent to you to run uh from I sent it earlier today? I don't know if you can run it off of the signal feed. >> Hold on. Did you send it on signal? Hold on. Let me look. >> Yeah, it's of Scott Bent sitting there. Um, this might be a good time to run it if you can get it. >> Yeah. Yeah, hold on. Give me a sec. Let me uh see if I can find it. All right, here we go. Oh, wait. >> When did you send it? >> Um.

>> Oh, okay. Here we go. Scott, is this it? Bant bet called the White House mid interview or is it something else? >> Yeah. Yeah, that's it. Yep. >> All right, let me see. Here we go.

>> I listened to you on the >> president. Sorry. Oh, okay. >> Okay. >> No problem at all. >> See you shortly, Mr. Secretary. >> You have to work that in. >> Mr. Secretary, I I have to say it's a first, I'm sure, alas as well, that uh an interviewee has been pulled away to go to the situation room. How was the president? Was he was he stressed? >> Uh no, the the the president is in great spirits. Uh the Iranian mission is proceeding well ahead of schedule and you know I have to tell you wealth that I'm a teenage teenager who's considering

military service and I could give this team my highest compliment from President Trump to the head of the joint chiefs to the secretary of war. I would they say that I would trust my child's life in their hands. >> Dude, what is that, dude? What is that? >> Wow. >> We could tear that apart in 10 different ways. What is that? Well, and there there have been I' I've watched a channel that does body language analysis and and Bent is usually very cool under pressure, very, you know, he knows he's been programmed well and he didn't do a very good job of of hiding the fact that he was visibly

shaken. >> Yeah. >> In this instance. >> Well, and then to come out and, you know, just turn the tide into, you know, the war's proceeding. Well, I have full faith in this administration, the military, and I would send my teenage son and I would have full faith like, dude, what is that? I mean, if that isn't trying to sell something, you know, like, right? I mean, that's just a total sales job. Like, I've never like I mean, I've had a hard time trying to like descent. Um, just because of his background, you know? I mean, made money for Soros, left, came back, made more money for Soros, left, started his own firm, took $2 billion from George Soros, you know. So, where is it? Someone who

spent 25 years in the Soros umbrella. Where where do your loyalties lie? You know, and we've never called him out and now what is going on with this guy? Like, you know, if there was ever a, you know, a a you know, a mental takeover, like that feels like it to me. Like that guy completely cracked right there. He was is a broken man. >> Well, look, I mean, at some point we you've got to if you're a Trump supporter, you've got to be asking the question, why is our Treasury Secretary of Soros guy? Why is the new chair of the Federal Reserve the guy who bailed out the banks last time? Why does the board of peace have Tony Blair and the person from the World Bank at Jared

Kushner? I mean at at some point a lot of people you know the first time around said oh he was surrounded by bad people and you know he won't make that mistake again. These people are worse. Howard Lutnik somebody justify explain to me why Howard Lutnik hasn't been forced to resign yet. I mean just on the base now I mean obviously we've talked about in detail with tether and some of these other things but even just on the Epstein thing alone there are other people and and he immediately goes to bat for this guy >> on the next you know >> the next day after the hearing uh he's got Lutnick next to him you know at some point there's no I mean I have it's it's not little

confidence. I I I think that the people that he's surrounding himself with and possibly himself are actively trying to harm uh the constitution and the people because of their backgrounds. I mean, literally these are these are you just objectively. Now, of course, I think it's funny that the guy that was responsible for the transition committee and recruiting a lot of these people is Lutnik himself, which is which is a whole other situation, but no. So, who who who gets canned is, you know, Christy Gnome or I guess she gets reshuffled. But, I mean, she's pretty she's innocuous compared to the rest of the people, including Pam Bondi. I mean, again, how how is how is Pam Bondi still

in this position after the way that she's handled a whole variety of things? The Epstein Files is only the latest, but I mean, she's got a pretty pretty long, horrendous track record here. So I there's, you know, is there anyone that you're confident in? I mean, and and again, JD Vance was wasn't picked by Trump. JD Vance was pushed by Teal >> and and David Saxs and Shimath Poly Hapatia, right? They're the ones that had the meeting in San Francisco that actually got him into the White House. Remember the fundraiser, right? >> Yep. That put it over, but it was Teal who introduced introduced him to Vance. I mean, I don't know. We're just >> Yeah. >> I I look at this stuff. I I look at

what's going on even with Iran and some of it you can see you know you can look at now the board of peace and you can track these organizations and the financial interests and the money but then but then there's a seems to be an element of incompetence to it as well because it seems like um uh I I don't think that they were prepared for I don't think they thought it through I I don't think they thought through the Iran thing at all. They do seem to be somewhat surprised by the fact that, you know, Iran didn't just fold. >> Yeah. Yeah. I don't know. I mean, I'm not sure about that yet. But what I do know is this. You know, when the when the administration started up and Elon

Musk was in there and the idea was we're going to cut all kinds of people and we're going to save all kinds of money and then we're going to grow GDP. We're going to get all this growth coming in. People really lit up by that idea. They get that, right? cut costs, make more money, you know, so you can say, "Oh, you know, Scott Bent can say, well, I don't want to bog people down with heavy numbers or whatever." No, people want to hear the numbers. So, he could have come back from wherever he had to go, and he could have said, you know, look, you know, look, this war is expensive. You know, we're blowing through stuff, but we're good. We, you know, here's how we're going to finance it. I mean,

there's certain things he can say without jeopardizing, you know, a country, you know, and he doesn't. There's never any discussion with us about finances at all. It's all just hype. You know, it's like that's the worst I've seen. That's why I thought it was useful because everything he says is hype. It's always clean up, clean up, clean up. In that particular case, I mean, he's offering his own son to the administration because he trusts it so much. I mean, it just I don't know where where do you go deeper than that, Aaron? Like, what's the next level down? I think he just went to the bottom floor. There is no there is no further basement lower than that, right? I mean, you know

what I'm saying? Like there's a huge gap between cutting costs, raising revenues, and you know, financing a war, which we know is going to cost us a trillion dollars, right? Before we're done, this is going to cost us at least a trillion dollars. No mention of that. But he's offering his son to the war. I I I don't know how you go any lower. I don't know how it gets any worse. >> Well, I'll give everybody a little hint. So you'll know that you're out of time and you don't you no longer have time to get your money out of the bank and get your investments out of brokerage firms when Wars goes on 60 Minutes. When he gets approved and he goes on 60 Minutes, that is your that is your warning. When

that's happened, it's too late. So I I'm just putting that out there right now. >> On Friday, when you Yeah. When you hear on Friday Kevin Worsh is going to be on 60 Minutes Sunday night, you better get there quick. >> You better get there quick. That's it. That was your last opportunity. And I'm not kidding about that. That that is like you go back and you watch Ernani and everything else and and just even the way that they try to sell it. But just understand why did Trump pick the Fed chair as the guy who did the bailouts of Bear Sterns and AIG. This is not a this is not an accident. This is a this is a controlled demolition of the economy. That's why you bring

that guy in. And I can't for the life of me understand why how people could sell that Trump is a populist or for the average person at this point when he's literally surrounded and and it's not to keep your enemies closer. I mean then do you have any friends because literally they're all enemies or maybe or maybe he's the enemy because at some point again Soros's guy you could put anybody in treasury. Why would you put descent there? It makes absolutely no sense. Why would you put Lutnik at commerce? Why would you go out of your way to to bring in a major fundraiser for Hillary Clinton in 2016 and make that the most important chair of your transition committee? None of it makes any sense.

And you know, of course, it's possible he's not really driving the ship or making any of the decisions either. But it's funny that, you know, he had his own family and people involved as as as advisers and then they're not doing at this time. What are they doing instead? They're monetizing war. They're monetizing all of this policy. Well, I >> we can't make excuses for him, Aaron. Here's why. I mean, he was at whatever street he and Epstein were on. He was at nine and Epstein was at 11. They were on the same side of the street. They were neighbors and it went through the same exact, you know, Wexner trust, you know? I mean, it there's like you can't make

excuses for that. I mean, I guarantee he was involv 10 to20 million property that he got for 10 bucks. He had to sign off. He had to sign off on the title transfer. I mean, we can't make excuses, you know, you can't make excuses for this guy. Well, I just didn't know. I wasn't I didn't know. I didn't know Epste, you know. You know, when you buy a home in New York that's worth$10 to20 million and you get it for $10, I guarantee he's aware of that. And I guarantee he knew that Epste was his neighbor. And I guarantee they knew each other way better than what he alludes to. >> Yeah. No, I mean, again, he was on the island. the business partners happened to buy. There's no Look, there's He

lied. He He explicitly lied. He went on a TV interview, he lied and then when he was grilled about it, he said, "Well, all I you know, all I know is what was in the files." I mean, and he literally says it with a little smirk or whatever. But I mean, at this point, you know, again, kind of enough is enough. like like the the the concern here is, you know, again, people need to get their assets in their own self-custody and need to start hitting the exits. I've talked about this so much, but you have to admit and you have to actually do the research at some point to realize countries that get to the point that we're at right now. This is not an unusual position. You know, usually

there is a dominant power. there is a uh there's a reserve currency, a global reserve currency and that comes to an end. There's no historical example of there being a turnaround. And I think if you look at this objectively, we're at peak corruption. It's not like we're going it's not like we have the A team. We we don't have the Avengers in here trying to fix things. We have we have the looters, not the Avengers, right? like it's I they might have propagandized it as being uh the Avengers, but but instead they're they're they're profiting off of it. And there's not a path to fix it. There's not a, oh, if you vote for this guy, again, people got duped into thinking

that Trump and the T I again, I'm still kind of baffled about the fact that coming out of 2020 after Operation Warp Speed and everything else, that people somehow convinced themselves that this was the only team, the team that that was Operation Warp Speed and more debt than had ever been added in one term, that that was the only team that could save Western civilization. the amount of programming and propaganda that required to make that sellable uh is impressive. Um but you know again there's no um there there's nothing on the right. Again, we were so, you know, how many people, you know, and I would discuss this with a lot of people and, you know, it doesn't surprise me now to know that

Patrick Burn was a CIA guy because when he was at Overstock and was trying to do Medici ventures, his whole thing was build a blockchain tech stack, a hot swappable, you know, thing if everything went under. But everything always with him became, well, the next election is the most important election. If we don't get this, it's over. And then we're four elections into that and weren't always on the right. We're often on the wrong side of those elections and everything's gotten worse, but then everybody's like, "Well, it's the next election at some point. Maybe it's not an election. Maybe there isn't a v you you don't vote your way out of this." And there are so many

people who people still listen to that have said for three or four elections that this election is the most important election and then they lost. Then they're still push now they're pushing and we're deeper in the hole on all of this. The debt is worse. The entitlements are worse. The corruption is worse. The regulation is worse. The economy is worse. And and yet and yet people are still holding on to this. And it's it's hard. But at some point you've got to acknowledge that maybe maybe this isn't a voting thing. And maybe putting our faith in people to make decisions for us after they've ruined everything isn't the right idea. This is why I say you look at the G gen Genius Act and the

Clarity Act. So, let me get this straight. There's a group of people that have that is responsible for the dollar losing 98% of its purchasing power, $39 trillion worth of debt, $200 trillion in unfunded liabilities. They use taxpayer money to fund their own sexual harassment suits and then won't release the information about this. They g and they engage in insider trading. And this is the group that we think is required to provide clear rules of the road for cryptocurrency and how we trade assets. How does that make any sense? Why would you possibly get a good outcome from those people? >> And there's no one there to challenge them. That's the even better part,

Aaron. There's zero there's no one at the table to challenge them. That's the even better part. >> I mean, again, but but there are people out there that think, well, that that buy the propaganda, oh, well, we need rules. these people better set these rules. The probability of getting rules that protect anybody from that group is zero. It does it doesn't make any even basic sense if you think about it for like 10 seconds. And yet here we are and it's just, you know, whatever. I I I'm holding a whole book, you know, I'll try to raise awareness around the clarity act and I've got I went on with Cather Katherine Austin Fitz uh on Friday and I've got some bigger interviews and

stuff coming up. Uh that will probably reach, you know, I was on Weinstein and everything else. We're probably reaching millions of people. I mean, like, you know, last week on mine I reached three million people just through X. Uh, so we're reaching more and more people and then some people are starting to comment, but it's not it's not enough to counter $200 million in lobbying and everything else. But, you know, maybe this war I again I saw if the weather in in DC and everything else, if they don't get this done, that clarity act done in April, then it's going to be shelved for this uh for this year, in which case if the mid the midterms happen, clarity

might actually be dead. So now if that happens again all that's done is bought time for people to understand what's going on here to understand that what we're actually facing is technocracy and that you know we've got to hit hit the exits not it doesn't give us more time to believe in another group of corrupt morons that are going to come in and ruin the system that if if that's the approach that we take then then you know we'd be better off just having it happen sooner rather than later rather than just kind of drawing this out. Why wouldn't they, Erin, like if this Clarity Act doesn't pass, why wouldn't they just, you know, put together a big beautiful bill number two and just, you

know, hang it all over that big Christmas tree at the end of the year and just jam and slam it through like they tried to do with the NAC's a couple years ago, right? The natural asset corporations. I mean, we've seen the NYSE, you know, the SEC, you know, FINRA, they don't care. They're all in on it together. I mean, they'll ramrod that stuff through. I mean, I just think it comes down to there's no choice between CFTC and SEC. I think they'll just say this is who gets it and this is how it's going to be and these are the rules that someone will just slam it through. That's what I I don't think they'll shove it. I I I think that if this war goes on and continues to be

unpopular and if you know I mean in Trump's case because he put up the the litmus test if oil keeps on if going up and gas keeps on going up then people there are going to be enough people I think uh the Dems are not going to vote for this because they want to recapture power. I think there are enough Republicans are going to look at this saying he's a lame duck anyway. There's no I don't need to be loyal to him anymore. And if the war is unpopular out of their own perceived self-interest, I think there are enough people that would defect the show. But that that's a scenario. I'm not even saying this is the most like I'm saying that this is a glimmer of hope. I'm saying this is

still kind of long shot because let me tell you what I'm not saying. What I'm not saying is well if we can only get the truth out to these senators, they'll vote the right way because I that's not even on the table. Nobody's senate. I have talked to these people. I've talked to Ted Cruz, Cynthia Lumis. I've talked to many of these senators. There's no there's no interest in facts. These people, you have to be pretty naive at this point to think that uh your your congressman is is swayed by objective information. I mean, at this point, this is clearly not how how the system works. They work based on self-interest. And given that we don't have, you know, billions of dollars to

counteract people that benefit from the legislation, we're not going to win on that front. It it is literally a sentiment shift and a variety of factors that are under not under our control that would actually tilt this the right way. And and look, it seems to be happening, right? Like again, it is stalled. There are um it's a little bit stalled right now. And you know, again, I I think the price of of oil has more to do with whether the Clarity Act lives or dies than than anything else. Nevertheless, we can continue to get the information out there. I I think if you could understand what the techmate looks like in Gaza and how that is a blueprint for everything else, that would change

your perspective on what stable coins are. That would change your perspective and your understanding of what tokenized assets are. If you understood that we leveled a country and destroyed 90% of the buildings and displaced 2.3 million people and then basically what we're saying is you don't get your land back. You don't own any property. Here's a digital token. >> That's what tokenization is. And what Patrick said is exactly right. This is how you will own nothing. Yeah. And if it's hard for you to understand that conceptually the way that I've been laying it out for the last three years, then here's a here's an actual plan. Here's the country that there this is

the AI powered smart city. This is the token they're describing it. It's a 32page document. You don't you don't have to believe me anymore. All you have to do is read the document they wrote. And this is Gaza. I mean, you know, again, the whole, you know, Yeah. Now, you have to go back and look at October the 7th. I mean, >> yeah, >> you have to really look at October the 7th, right? I mean, if we're honest about it, you get into trouble talking about it. I got into trouble talking about it at the time. >> I won't even go into that now, but I mean, at some point, you question that narrative. They were allowed in. >> Yeah. >> Right. This was not this was not an accident. So

>> well and you know like again I look at the harmonics and I had a signal you know in the crude oil and I listen to media and they're hyping it. Oh you know as they always come out1 150 $300 crude oil whatever it is and I was like I don't think so. I think this crude oil is going to go down and if it goes down below 7937 it's going way lower you know and again you know that's how you can sort it out. I know that sounds kind of crazy, but that's how I sort this stuff out because I'm like, okay. And the thing is, it's not like that was some random number. The crude oil came back up and tested that 7937 like four or five times, you know, to prove that that level was important and it proved it

five times, you know? So, it fits with the narrative. It goes back and it ties in with what Wickoff was saying when he said two years ago there was a master plan and you're like wait a minute two years ago like you know this he said this three or four months ago two years ago that was before October 7th you know and I you know this is intentional Aaron I mean this has been built for a long time you know and I think this India this IMAC this IMAC corridor plan I think it's it fits perfect you know I don't know if you've studied that at all or read it. >> I've only I've only like read summary information, but yeah, I mean, it certainly >> it's like a hand in glove. >> Yep.

>> I mean, it's got all the things in it, right? It's got, you know, railways, shipto rail transit networks, high-speed data cables, you know, it involves India, USA, Saudi Arabia, France, Germany, Italy, European Union. I mean, you know, it's basically an alternative to the belt and road. I mean, you know, it's a power play to some extent, you know. I mean, it's a counter to to China's belt and road. I mean, I just when I listen to all this stuff and you watch what's going on right now, I don't know how that that has to be that fits like a it just fits perfect almost. And and the termination point, it starts in India, goes through Saudi Arabia. >> Yep. >> Ends in Hifa at the port of Hifa. I

mean, you can't make this stuff up, right? I mean, it's almost exact. It just, you know, it it if you're going to have these six 15-minute cities in this Gaza region, what do you need? You need to be able to supply stuff into there. You have to incentivize people come into, you know, it's kind of like the roach motel. You know, you got to give, you got to have good bait or nothing's coming in. So, you got to have supplies. You got to have things that the rest of the world doesn't have. Well, we've got everything. We've got energy. We've got this. We've got food. We've got Why? Because they've carved it out. And so you Why do you go into the Roach Motel?

Because it looks pretty good, right? The food looks good. You know, you go in, you don't come out. >> Yep. >> Yeah. No, I think that's that's that's exactly right. So, anyway, I hope I hope I think this was an important episode that uh we will expand on obviously as we continue to learn more. you know, I'll work on a song and some and memes and everything else to to try to to convey this. But uh and I want to get a hand my hands on the whole uh 32page plan for Gaza and and share that and put that out so that people people can actually see this is no one's theorizing about this. This is an actual document, a plan, 112

billion dollar plan that has been drafted and and significant work and vendors and it's been mapped out. It's a full It's a full business plan. And and and so if you're in any way skeptical about technocracy, this this is what I've learned about this because, you know, it was a little murky in you would ask yourself, you know, prior to the election, you know, that they're working on a technocracy, but you're looking at the UN and Agenda 2030 and and looking at these centralized CBDCs and you ask yourself, all right, well, how are they gonna, you know, they're working on the pieces, but it was unclear how they're going to put it together. Now the the the key source for this has been to to

push private solutions that are regulated by government and and so then now you can understand how it actually works right and now you can see a specific plan in Gaza where it's like okay because you might say well how are they going to do a 15minute city well now here's exactly how they're going to do a 15minute city here are the vendors they're going to use this is the tech it's got Oracle it's got Palunteer here. It's got USD1 there. There's it's it's it's it's very concrete now. It's not a well, you know, there are some people behind the scenes working on some stuff or even though we knew there were CBDC pilots, um you know, people used stable coins to do $33 trillion worth of

transactions, you don't even have to speculate, well, people won't actually use it. People are already using elements of they're already using the technology for different applications that's being proposed in Gaza. So there's not even a question of, you know, can it work technically? It actually already works technically. Um, and so you even when you look at Stargate itself and you consider the fact that Oracle and Palunteer are part of Gaza, then the Gaza rebuild, then then that actually puts it makes more of that make sense. Look at all of the deals that Trump announced at the beginning of this second term.

And then look at those vendors and those companies and those sovereign wealth funds with respect to their positioning with not only the reconstruction pro project in Gaza, but their participation in the board of peace. The board of peace is the payoff for the people that are coming and doing making these announcements to make Trump look good. Now, by the way, you also look back on it. Trump has a history going back to his first term of announcing massive deals, 500 billion here, 100 billion here, and they never materialize or they materialize in a fraction. It they're not binding agreements. So, I mean, it's almost like they're laughing at us. Somebody comes from the Middle East and

says, "Oh, yeah, what was it? Was it Saudi Arabia? Oh, no. we're going to do a trillion dollars or or you know he'll do one of these like press conferences and it's like well you know I convinced him to go from you know 800 billion to one trillion. It's like great there's no agreement. There's no legally binding agreement. You just have held a press conference where you made it look like you're a hero. But what you did do is your son-in-law just took $2 billion from these guys uh on a private deal. Right. That's a real deal. That real money actually took place. The whole the whole thing is a kind of a cruel joke when you when you track it down. But it's tough because you know people don't

know how this stuff works and a lot of this stuff is is hidden. That's why there's more to be unveiled out of the Epstein files as married to the offshore leaks. I there was a picture recently that surfaced of Jeffrey Epstein wearing a uh what was the name of it? Fans Seca something other one of the one of the companies that uh was one of the law firms accounting firms etc. that was the largest involved in handling the information about these offshore LLC's. You actually have Epstein wearing one of their shirts. >> Wow. >> Uh, in fact, I'm going to see if I can find it now. I I if I if I can find that, um, I will actually put it up on the screen because that's telling now. I

have that data. I have not had time actually. Yes. Here we go. Here we go. Let let me uh I got to pop this up because this is this is too good. I I hope you know if you're out there there are some documentaries that have been done on the uh Pandora papers and the Panama papers. I know the Panama papers, but I think there have been a couple of documentaries. Um you know, it's interesting that there haven't been good documentaries made. You know what I mean? Like big short style. They're kind of these lowbudget things. Uh >> yeah. >> Uh let me try this. Feka Epste. This is a shirt worn by Epstein.

Mosak Fon Seca because taxes are for poor people and and and and then there's actually an email exchange where where Epstein is saying he's worried about what's in there. So again, you what I found now when as I say this, I'm going to preface this by saying this might be wrong because I was testing my own system, but I uh used the technocracy atlas and I asked for connections between Epstein and Brock Pierce and it searched the Pandora Papers and the Panama papers and it found a common investment that they had from 2005 2006. So, you know, there are millions of files in these offshore leaks. So, what I've been saying is between the information of the Epstein files, if you

can marry that to these offshore files, that is how the world works. That is actually really following the money. And so, there is the potential to learn how everything works. Now, I mean, what's interesting is I think there were some journalists that were involved in uncovering this that were murdered and certainly in in like Russia or whatever. There's a a whole story about what went into securing the leak and then being able to put it up in a censorship resistant way. But the truth is most of the financial press, most of the people that were involved in that don't really understand finance. I mean, really smart people, yeah, I I don't want to say this. This

sounds horrible, but but if you're a journalist, you probably don't really understand how that stuff works, right? You you're you're not you're not trained in in how Yeah. >> You're not kneede in it. You know what I mean? You don't know you haven't seen the the unspoken, I guess, is the thing, right? You know, when you're in an industry, you see things go on and you're like, "Okay, you put two and two together." They they don't have that experience, right? They're just list asking people questions and and then trying to assemble a story, but they don't really know how it works. You're right. >> No, they don't know how it works, which is why it's the perfect thing for

crowdsourcing because I even I look at this about the traction that I've gotten on the Epstein crypto thing, which pisses a lot of people off, but but it's because I've known these people. I've known some of these organizations and I know how a lot of this stuff already works from my previous background, but there's a real narrow slice of this, but there are thousands of people uh tens of thousands of people or more all over the world that know actual are direct participants in little pieces of these stories. And if you can take that real experiential knowledge and actually pull it, um it's a game changer. That's why >> yeah, >> I'm hoping we can get get some more

traction. Now, admittedly, it's helpful to have AI do the first part of it, right? Because how do you how do you even begin to map three and a half million pages to 13 million records, right? That's not a manual job. There's got to be like some initial seating of this. But once the initial seating happens, then yeah, then people can come in and make adjustments and uh and put some of the dots together. But I I think that um we now obviously people aren't talking about the Epstein files as much as they were. We haven't harvested a fraction of the information that's in there and and I'm still learning stuff uh you know every day just even from my own small slice of what I'm looking at

where it's like today we talked about the fact that oh wait Epstein was talking to people about putting together a basically a stable coin that was Sharia compliant. Right now when you when you it There are people, particularly Bitcoin, people that try to make the claim that, well, you know, Epstein's in it because, you know, he's a passive investor, right? So, it's like it's like, you know, a Fidelity portfolio manager. Of course, he's investing to get the biggest return. No, this guy was known as Mr. Money. This guy was actually involved for strategic reasons in these things, right? If if it were just about making money, he wouldn't be donating money privately to MIT. There's no

profit there, right? that it's a nonprofit. It's a it's a 501c3. There's no ROI on the contribution. He's doing it for strategic reasons because it benefits other things. Whether he's trying to buy, you know, fund scientists so that he can then later monetize the science or if he has specific applications that he has in mind for the use of the science. It's not passive. This guy was not his role was not as a fund manager. So anyway, it's uh so much so much to learn, you know, hopefully we get back back to that. Hopefully society starts focusing on

that because it's related. It's even actively related to I mean, you know, I haven't even looked Jared Kushner. I mean, I know Epstein tracked Kushner. I mean, I wonder what the what the the whole history and the whole dynamic uh is there. Um because Epstein seems like the kind of guy if anybody was going to try to put together and would have been central to this Gaza project, it would have been Epstein. >> You would think so. One of the things I think that I've been listening to a lot lately or catching bits and pieces of I don't know how sometimes you know you don't know how and why but you get hit with a couple things but I think you probably can reference this or I you

know I' I've known I've experienced this in the past where people like to let things out you know because they just don't broadcast it. They don't put it on a billboard, but it's almost like it relieves their conscience or something, right? Well, we told them, we put it out there. You know, it some I don't know if it there's even something here that's higher than that, you know, a higher level of, you know, demonic operation or, you know, spiritual operation, you know, where they they have this belief, you know, I mean, it's probably the reason they also do sacrifice and, you know, all that kind of stuff, whatever, right? the but you know the you wonder if these files have

been released almost at this timing because you know it's almost two steps behind where they're at. You know what I mean? And we're playing catchup. You ever feel like that we're playing catchup but we're two steps behind because the real step is you know the stuff that's going on you know real time Gaza is not going to happen overnight. I mean, you're not going to blow that place to shreds and, you know, have, you know, 80s story skyscrapers and six cities built. I mean, that's a 10-year project, right? I mean, that's not a that's not a you can't do that in two to three years. Now, what will be interesting to watch is, you know, Black Rockck just invested a few years ago and

I think it's called GICS. It's a big infrastructure company, so they're doing data centers. They're doing a bunch of stuff like that. It would it would be interesting like you said, you know, when we do the show, start following the money. That's why I'm so interested in this IMAC, you know, because that's following the money. I mean, you can see it. It's coming out of India. It's going through Saudi Arabia. You got data. You got energy. You got hydrogen lines. You got you got it all. I mean, you got it all coming through there. So, you're following the money. Same thing with this. Who's going to start lining up is the contractor that's actually going to do this work. Now, we know, you know,

Jared and, you know, the Trump boys, they'll probably be the general contractors on it. They'll oversee it, but they're not going to be doing the work. When the contracts start happening, then you know you're underway. And you know, then the clock starts ticking, right? >> Yep. >> Yeah. Well, I mean, we're always we've been way far behind. We may be getting closer, though, because at least with this Gaza thing, it it hasn't been done yet. It's still an active project. So, maybe we are closing closing the gap. But but to me, this is why something like the Clarity Act is so important because once that gets put in place, then then then we have a hard time stopping it. I I really think so much

rests on the Clarity Act in terms of our ability to buy to buy time. It is, you know, you asked earlier on there are no benefits to it there. It's it is a it is a surveillance system for real world assets. It has nothing to do with crypto and it's almost impossible. People in crypto don't care because they only care about the number going up. People that aren't in crypto assume that it is crypto because they don't understand the application to real world assets. Even if they never hold a cryptocurrency at all, the stuff that they already own will be converted to tokens. But they won't know because they already don't have self-custody. People aren't even aware of the fact that they already

don't own their stuff. Now you have to convince them that you don't own your stuff and the stuff that you don't own is going to be put on a surveillance system that's going to make it even easier to steal, right? So you got to get through you gota you got to explain both of those uh in a way that they understand and frankly nobody wants to even accept or even consider the first part because it's pretty painful, right? That you know the idea of I've worked my entire life at this job. I don't like it. I don't even own these I don't even own these stocks that are building my digital prison. Are you kidding me? Right. I you know because then you've gota you know realize you've been you've been

kind of a you've been a slave to the system for for your entire lifetime and and that's a that's a tough pill to swallow but a lot of people are going to have to do it uh soon because you know again I I don't we don't have a lot of time. This Iran thing is going to get out of control. I mean, I I had a conversation, I don't say who it was, was somebody yesterday who um uh knows a lot about oil, the oil markets, peak oil, all this other stuff. And uh he had some interesting things to think about related to, you know, what the impact is. And you're already seeing this with not just oil, but but fertilizer. Did you just jump in again? Hold on. Are you uh

All right. >> Yeah. Somehow I got bumped out. I don't know if it was my end or I don't know what happened. >> All right. Um anyway, I I was just saying um I don't know what I was just saying. It was >> some about energy markets. >> Oh, energy markets. Yeah. So, you know, we have the impact of oil and we also have fertilizer and just what it would mean if oil hit $200 and what the impact of that would be over a pretty short period of time. how how how when you consider everything else that's going on, I mean, this this could be the the big thing and watching as countries don't want to help out as Germany's like, "No, we're not going to participate that." People are pushing

back on the US. And to the point where Trump's coming out, it's like, well, you know, we'll go it alone. We're the strongest. I I he I don't think he not only was he not anticipating the response of Iran. He wasn't was also not expecting the response of European countries and even some of the countries in the Middle East who are kind of like hey you know maybe we want to take a take a step out of you know take a step back and not get involved in this right so so we're not getting usually we get lockep support even if they're adversaries I mean if you think about how surprisingly Tony Blair came to the table uh to support George W Bush which was kind of unexpected from the

standpoint of where their perceived ideologies were, right? But then Tony Blair became a huge a huge ally and a huge supporter of of Iraq and and you know skewed our failed flawed fraudulent narrative about weapons of mass destruction and everything else. We don't we're not even getting that this time. This time people are kind of like nah you know we're out. Um so that's kind of it'll be interesting to see how that plays out. Yeah. Um, on that note, like this Robert, uh, Gabriel and Tony Blair, do you think they're on the board of peace strictly for the surveillance component of it? Isn't Tony Blair doing a bunch of digital ID stuff? Isn't that his consulting company?

>> Uh, yes. Tony Tony Blair I think I've talked about this before his uh Blair Foundation is one of the most powerful organizations around the globe at pushing digital ID. In fact that his organization is is probably one of the most influential and so so he is you know not surprisingly a complete you know one 100% technocrat. He's also a contributor to the WEF. In fact, he's I'm looking at his stuff now. Even he's an adviser to Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Israel, Palestinian Authority, Africa, elsewhere. He's the uh senior adviser and chairman of the international council at JP Morgan Chase. He's a board member in social global adviser to the anti-defamation

league. He is, you know, contributor to WF, frequent participant in groups like Bilderberg and and Aspen Institute. I mean, I just >> you can't script it. >> No, you can't. I This is why when I saw him on there, you know, again, the the the the people that are like, "Oh, we defeated the WF." It's like, no. Like, I take a step back and look at this. Yeah. Clash Schwab is gone and he's replaced by Larry Frink. And then we have this like this is it's again, it's a hyper acceleration and nobody paid any attention. And now there's no speed bump. Now there's nobody protesting it. You didn't like Clashwa, but you're okay with Larry Frink. How does that work? You don't like the UN, but it's

perfectly okay if the president of the World Bank and Tony Blair on the board of a self-interested network of people that are pushing an explicit technocracy. Now, admittedly, I think most people just don't know about this. I think I think people are not paying attention to the board of peace. Even the irony of the fact that we launched a board of peace and then immediately launched a war, you'd think that would put enough scrutiny on it that I'm not seeing other people most people when you talk to them have not heard about the board of peace. They don't know anything about it. Nothing. >> Yeah. I mean, if if they know anything, they know that it's a billion dollars to

join it. That's about all that you would know, right? It's a billion dollar membership per person. Yeah. Now, what about this Robert Gabriel? So, this guy has been um longtime adviser to Trump, worked with him since 2016, special assistant to Stephen Miller, um founding executive board named Okay, so he's he's definitely one of the higherups there. Um national security adviser. What do you think his role is? Do we know anything else on this guy? >> Have you ever seen a video clip on him? I mean, is this guy just light up? Is this guy like a hammer put down the hammer kind of a guy? I mean, he's he >> I know less about him than any of the others at this point. Um, so

in fact, I'm trying to look it up now, but yeah, he's the NSA guy. >> Yeah, it'd be interesting to get a clip on him and just check out his demeanor, see what kind of what he's like. >> Yeah. Yeah. No, we we've we've definitely got more more work to do, but you know, again, stop the Clarity Act or hope that it stops. Um hope that the US doesn't put $10 billion into the Board of Peace. Um anything that could derail that and Trump losing the midterms would kill that. Um you know, those are those are some big some big steps. I that th that would help a lot. And I think Lutnik getting ousted would would help um because again

he's a critical critical piece to this not only on the stable coin side but on the tokenization of assets. You do that you actually we we actually at least have a speed bump but but you have to appreciate how truly uh without resistance this is going right now. Like I like it's I I wish I could quantify exactly how how much faster this is going than if even if Harris had won. Like I can't even conceive of a scenario where if Harris won any of this would I don't think we'd have Real ID. We would not have the Genius Act. We would not have um we wouldn't have the Board of Peace. We would have a bunch of incompetent people dicking around with

CBDC's and trying to coordinate stuff, having a bunch of meetings with a bunch of, you know, weak people who would draft a lot of policies and put together a lot of specifications and not build anything. That that's my guess as to what would happen. >> Well, and that's what I'm afraid of, Aaron, is that's why we had them, right, in preparation for this. You know, I don't think this stuff is just like I said, this isn't just a tumble weed rolling through the desert. You know what I mean? like this stuff's laid out. This isn't just like happening, right? This isn't just like, you know, like cinder blocks forming a foundation, you know, and then a house being built upon

it, you know? I This is So, if you're going to bring this in, what do you do? You do nothing for four years, right? You drive people absolutely insane with nothingness, you know, and the whole and then when you come in hard, people are like, "Yeah, this is what I'm talking about." You know, action. This is what we've been looking for is action. You know, they're not assessing the action. They're just saying, "This is great. At least we're doing something." You know what I mean? I want to see some people get arrested, but at least we're doing something. You know, >> does that make sense? >> Yeah, it does. Talk is saying, "Did Trump enact Real ID?" Yeah, it was one

of the first things that uh Christine Gnome did. So, Real ID was passed after being fought for 20 years. It was enacted under Christy Gnome. It's already digital in 15 states. If you don't have a Real ID, you have to pay uh or a passport, you have to pay $45 each way on a flight. And the roll out is for Real ID to be digital in all 50 states by 2027. That happened under Trump. This is one of the things I've been saying. I'm like this this because I've been fighting this. People in New Hampshire used to fight this all the time. States fought it. There were like 24 attorney generals fighting it. and Trump gets in and it gets enacted and people aren't even paying attention. Um, that's a

massive problem. And I've been trying to say people are like, well, you know, the UK was trying to do a a digital ID by 2029 and people over here were making fun of it. And I talked to the people and I'd find out they already have a real ID. They don't even realize. And by the way, that real ID, which innocuously started off as you just have to provide a little bit more information, is going to be tied into the Palunteer database that uh Musk connected uh Palunteer to all these federal government databases. That was part of what Doge did. So people are sitting here like, "Oh yeah, we defeated Clash Schwab. now have a digital ID and thanks to Doge, which you thought was cost savings, your

information is going to be connected across different federal governments. That is um that's tragic. And then this and I want to say so whether the blowback that we get I mean you know whatever you see this you know these shootings and everything else that are going on. Um, if we we attacked Iran and we actually took out a religious leader, we actually So, do you not expect retaliation when unprovoked you take out somebody's military or excuse me, spiritual leader? Would we not expect retaliation? I mean, we caused it. And the problem is that when we do have whether it's an actual real attack, counterattack or a false flag, then

people are going to get afraid and then they're going to accept more digital ID and more palunteer which is actually part of the design which is why every day whenever something happens I'm like I'm not going to you know I'm already against the pal the drones and whatever kind of surveillance they're going to try to put in as a consequence a blowback for our own policies that we should have never done. This is what happens. We end up getting more rights stripped away because of the policy actions that we didn't even agree to to begin with. And that's happening, right? You It's It's I mean, it's a standard playbook at this point. It's just that it's so predictable that it's it's

frustrating how predictable it is. >> Yeah. >> We bombed a school. the song I'm going to play on on when when I close on this. We we bombed a school. We doubletapped a we bombed a school and then we bombed the location outside of the school where the kids were hiding after the first bombing. We killed 170, Iranian school girls. This this is we did this. Our taxpayer money did this. This this is no longer speculation. Uh the Trump administration has admitted it. We killed 170 school girls. I mean, they're the bad guys. I, you know, I it's it's it's it's insane what what is happening here. And and by the way, I

encourage anybody to I have a lot of people that reach out to me from Gaza. Um, and so, you know, some of it may be propaganda. I have to try to vet some of it. But I mean, there are plenty of verified pictures of Gaza. what's happened in Gaza. There's a reason that that you know there are many countries that have a warrant out for Benjamin Netanyahu. It's genocide. And we we are supporting that. At some point, you know, we're sold a story about liberating people and that's not that's not what's going on here. We're not liberating people. We're we're decimating people. are destroying their land and then displacing them to build casinos in 15minute cities.

>> Yeah. One quick thing on this Robert Gabriel um Aaron is again all reported so again take it for what it's worth but it is quoted and it says during the January 6th attack Robert Gabriel reported reportedly texted a staffer that po I'm sure pus is loving this right during the J6 attack and later instructed speech writers to quote insert the Mike Pence lines unquote into Trump's speech directly urging the vice president to reject the electoral votes. So there's clearly a tie here. This guy's on the inside. You know what I mean? Like I the whole J6 thing doesn't add up to me either because look, here's the

thing, Aaron. We know I mean we know the guy that was on the ground, you know, it responsible for the people defending the capital, right? I mean, he was out very vocal, right? And seemed like a great guy. I forget his name, but kind of a funny name. And he knew he was reporting to Schumer's person and Pelos's person. And he thought that they just couldn't hear him because he was calling in for support. And he was like, "Why am I not getting anything back? Why am I not hearing anything back from these people?" and and he ended up then later on, you know, a couple years later, he got a hold of the tapes and he got to listen to and he could hear himself calling in and he knew they were sitting

there listening to it. They just never responded, right? So again, you know, but we have that, right? We have that. You know what I mean? And so there's a lot more to that story on that whole thing. To me, that feels like it was like a double setup. You know, there was a setup, then there was another setup behind the scenes on that whole thing. And this Robert Gabriel apparently was a part of that whole thing. So again, not a great thing, right? Not a great thing if those are truly his quotes where he says, "I'm sure POTUS is loving this, you know." >> Well, well, on top of that, understand he's the US deputy national security adviser. There's nothing in this guy's

background that qualifies him for this. If you if you look at this, so he was um prior to that in the first administration, special assistant to the president in the West Wing, uh policy adviser during the 2016 campaign. He's described as a political adviser, speech writer, former television producer, right? So this guy is is the so on that background, he's the US deputy national security adviser. There's that doesn't make sense. And by the way, it's like Pete Hegth. This is another guy who was um Fox News. He he's um so if you kind of go back and look at this, I thought I thought I saw Fox News somewhere. But uh but this is not a a

background. Oh yeah, hold on. Let me dig through this here. Oh, yeah. Yeah, here we go. Associate producer for the Ingram Angle starting in 2017. So, more of the information here is his career in politics began in 2016. Uh, and then he joined Stephen Miller's staff as special assistant, then associate producer for the Ingram Angle while Trump was still president. And by the way, I mean, this is another I, you know, the whole manipulation of the of the media and the propaganda here. I I it's on it's both sides, but I actually think at this point Republicans probably are more overtly controlling media. If you look at True Social, Rumble, uh placement of people

at Fox, it's it's it's every bit as bad as anything that the the Dems have done. Um and so it's it's equal it's equally bad. But yeah, you're right. POTUS, I'm sure, is is liking this. Uh he held postgovernment roles including a limited liability company where he received monthly payments from Trump Associated Political Action Committee. He assisted Susie Wilds in the presidential campaign. I mean this th this guy doesn't have any expertise that should be on the board of peace or he's he must be just loyal and be a special projects kind of guy. >> Yeah, that sounds about right. I think you're right. Special projects loyal. think that. So, it'd be interesting to

get a couple clips on him and see what his demeanor is like. I'd like to see what that guy, you know, how he behaves when he's in a 10-minute >> interview or something like that. Get a read on him. >> Yep. Well, I mean, I this is just there's so this is a good start. We're going to be uh doing doing a lot more on this. think I'm glad Patrick came on because I think as you saying this is probably the most important study um issue to take a look at because it it's kind of where all you can see where the strategy and money is being funneled but look I mean just to summarize this I mean they're showing you so JP Morgan hid behind a judge Cheney hid behind a blind trust these guys are just putting

this stuff out in the open like it's a NASDAQ ticker. I mean, charter that says chairman for life. Then the Suns announce a drone investment one week into a bombing. Kushner presents a real estate deal at Davos. They're like, this is all being done publicly. And I I had a conversation I was at a a retreat with some people that were talking about how important of a shift it is where we would do things militarily in the past and it was always propagandized as we're the moral authority and we're protecting you know protecting the world based on you know rights and our kind of constitution so on and so forth. we we

were always either what spreading democracy or protecting you know and then that that's done and so what does it mean somebody was even saying that with respect to kind of these international agreements that we have um you know people agree not to use nukes there are a lot of nukes a lot of countries have nukes we agree not to use it but but at what point uh if somebody uses one a tactical nuke then that's going to completely change move the Overton window on that well we're no longer claiming moral uh superiority. In the case of Venezuela, we started out talking about cartels, but then 48 hours later, it wasn't about that. It was this is our oil. We're taking our oil back by Trump. This

explicit. So, um I think that that's a dangerous place to go even when you're not even using the pretense of having principle because now it's just kind of a might makes right looting kind of scenario. And I think we're about to find just as we've gotten crushed by China and technology, I think we're going to find our military might not be as as strong as we think it is. I think we are finding that. >> Well, I mean, we only sent what, you know, $350 billion worth of money and equipment to Ukraine. I guess >> Well, yeah, to Ukraine. And now, yeah, now now China's surrounding Taiwan again. You've got North Korea firing

off, you know, weapons, you know, towards Japan. Um, you've got Pakistan today attacking Afghanistan. I mean, this seems kind of like World War I, right? Like stuff happens and then because other people are embroiled in a in a broader conflict, other people that have regional conflicts not related to the main conflict start fighting each other because there's no policemen. And we're already way overstretched. And so, of course, what we decided to do, we decided to take action in in Ecuador uh at the same time as as we're doing all this other stuff. We're spread way way too thin. And the thing is, the other thing I think is different about this is young people are not buying it.

Um I was at a conference, young people are not they're not buying that Israel is our greatest ally. In fact, multiple polls have shown that that there is an absolute break. First of all, for the first time ever, the majority of Americans don't support Israel. But then when you break that down further by uh generation, people are not interested. This is why they're, you know, on the USS Jerry Ford or whatever, they're starting fires after having stuffed the to people are there's not any appetite for this because there's no perceived just cause and in fact there isn't even an explicit just cause in some of these cases. But how are you going to there's almost no ability to sell a moral cause

in Iran. So the real tipping point when people will be when people realize that the enemy is in Washington DC, not in the Middle East. And we're actually getting close to that point. >> I think people know. I think there's a sense that that's always been the case. They just don't know who to where to point. You know, DC is a multi-polar c, you know, crooked spot. You know, it's like, okay, where and we know it's there. We just don't know where. You know, we don't know under under what rock. We know it's in a rock in this location in DC. We just don't know where, right? We don't know what >> the whole thing. But the thing is, I think the turning point is going to be

when people realize it's actually the whole thing. It isn't there isn't a part of it. It's not that it's a bad thing. The whole thing is absolutely rotten. There is that the difference is there's not a good part. And you know, they've tried to sell everything from, oh, there are white hats and military intelligence and Q and trust and play. They've tried every shade of SCOP. And at the end of the day, it's there's nothing there. It's not true. And and again, you know, once you study the history of these things, you read the devil's chessboard, you learn about the CIA, you learn about it. This didn't just get bad. It was never good to begin with. >> Um, but it's been a lot of propaganda.

And so I don't think that there is the will of young people in this country to fight because I because look, if you're Gen Z or whatever, you've been through how many economic collapses? You've been through COVID, you can't afford to buy a house. If you if you've just graduated from college, uh you can't find a job. More people that graduate from college are unemployed. It's like 51% can't even find a job. What are you fighting for? There is there is no idealized version of this worth fighting for. You've got a miserable life and you've gone through trauma after trauma and you've gone through one humiliation exercise after another with each each election. Those people are not going to

die for that. Die to preserve that preserve. What is the American way that you're preserving at this point? So, I think I think the more interesting thing is is not even necessarily what's going on in the Middle East, but what's going to happen here in response and whether or not there's support. I think the support is is drying up really rapidly. So, they're going to have to come up with a hell of a false flag >> to unite people at this point. I don't think people would buy 911 if it were today. >> I think you're right. >> So, all right. Well, look, I'm uh I I've got to I'm heading out. I got to head to the airport really early in the morning, so I still have to get some stuff ready.

So, I'm not going to do this. >> Sounds good. Have a great trip, Erin. Thanks for doing the show. Great topic. >> Thanks for coming on, and we'll do it again. We'll extend on this. And uh and so for everyone, I'm going to play this this video new. Um I'm calling this song Ditch the Dollar, but uh we'll play that on the way out. And uh uh I'm not This is the last show this week. will be back next Thursday at 6 PM. A topic to be determined. So, have a great night. Another

headache. Another head hangs slowly. A child is slowly taken. She braided up her hair that morning. Seven years old and forsaken. The missile found the classroom roll 3 seconds from the door. Her mother cries into the evening.

The same cry she heard before. But you see tonight where I answer my daughter in a share in a school across the sea with their moms and their coins and their sons and their sons and your head in your head. They are funding when you're a dollar. When you're darling, when it's your

stock price, the sun sold 10,000 drones. The draft is on the table now, but the tall boy stays at home. 6'8, you go to war. 6' n you're free. One inch between the body bag and the boy who holds a key. But you see it's not me. It's not my family. The sun is one inch from the draft and a

million miles from the infantry with their tanks and their bombs and their bows and their coins and their sons and their sons in your head. In your head they are falling with your daughter. We are with your 70 billion to rebuild what they bomb. Smart cities where the school used to

stand. And they call it the board of peace. But peace does not have a chairman. Peace does not need your money to exist. So stop giving it to them. Every dollar another missile. Every dollar another drone. Every dollar another checkpoint. Every dollar another home on every cent is a tiny bomb. Every bill is a tiny cage. Every dollar that you spend tonight writes a name on a tiny break. But you see it's not me. It's not my family.

But the dollar in my pocket built the bomb that killed her. With their tanks and their bombs and their drugs and their coins and their sons and their sons in your head and your head you are with your daughter with your daughter. It's your door.

at your door. Another head hangs slowly. The child is slowly taken. She braided up her hair that morning. Ditch the dollar. Bring her home. Heat up here.

Oh, live free or die, but death's not the worst. It's waking up empty. It's dying of thirst. Trading your days for insurance and pills. While the machine builds your cage and you're paying the bills, quiet aspiration, that's the real grave. A life half lived as a comfortable slave. This ain't what you were born for. You know it's true. You feel it in

your chest. Breaking through the wire in the walls. Closing in. Tracking your dollars underneath your skin. Left and right. Same throne, same crown. No one stands up. No one makes a sound. They hand you a ball like it means something real. Two wings are one bird. Same deal. Same still we say no no to the t no to the dollar running through our no to the white no to the lights. This is the day that we ride.

It's right here. It's right now. Your rights are yours. You take them back. Not giving it out. Not from the left, not from the right. They were always yours. Now step into the light. The daylight breaks. A new day comes. We take it back. Every last one. Live free or die. We fan the flame. Nothing will ever be the same. The flame. Heat. Heat.

Heat. Heat.