Operation Warp Speed 2 0 -- The Control Grid Built While MAGA Sleeps

We are the map makers charting their control. Everything tank, every doner, every NGO they own. Trace the lines from Brussels to the councils in New York. But the map was just beginning of the real world. And we realized halfway through the map's not the destination. It's the parallel we're building

that's the real creation. Oh, we're the map makers. Map makers. >> But we're building more. >> Building more. Not their whole empire. >> Whole empire. >> Now we're building what's in store. >> What's in store? >> We're creating schools. We're creating trade. We're creating everything. The map just showed the way. I know where Claus Schwab d. I know who funds the who.

I know the names of every council, every plan they're pushing through. But I also know the farmer, building food outside their grid. I know the doctor healing freely. I know what the builders did. And the map hangs on my wall, a reminder of the past. But my days are spent creating futures that will last. Oh, we're the map. Map makers. >> And we're building now.

>> Building out map their whole system. >> Whole system. >> Now we're showing them how >> showing them how. >> We're creating money. We're creating care. We're creating everything. Life is great out here. Some nights I still study every note upon the chart. But then I look at what we're building and it fills my heart. We're not fighting their system. We're just making something new.

The map makers became the builders. That's what we do. So we'll map their every meeting >> document their every scheme, >> but we'll spend our lives creating everything they couldn't dream. We are the map makers. map. >> But we're builders most of all. >> Most of all, >> the map showed us the prison. >> Now we're answering the call. >> The call. >> We're the map maker.

>> We're the map maker. >> And we're building free. >> Building free. >> Map their whole control. all control. >> Now we're what there'll never be. >> Never be. >> We're creating future. >> We're creating life. We're creating everything. And life is great tonight. The mad maker

building now the mad maker is great somehow. We map their cave. >> We're building more. >> The map maker is opening the door.

Well, you can join the CFR if you got the right degree. Build will call you if you're in their industry. WF will make you young global leader if you're on their list. The membership has its privileges. You get to pick the presidents and write the policy. You get to crash the markets and then claim it's free. You get to start the wars and never send your kids. The membership has its privileges, but the goos are all our souls. You can summar

every January's book. You can edit Wikipedia when history's being cooked. You get a seat at Jackson Hole when they're planning next year's crash. The membership has its privileges. You get to own the media and pick what gets reported. You get to fund both candidates, so outcomes are pre-orded. You get to shape the curriculum that teaches all our kids. The membership has its privileges, but the dues are all our souls. Black Rock, Vanguard, Trarone, Atlantic Council 2, Club of Rome, Aspen

Institute. There's a seat reserved for you. Group of 30 Bohemian Grove. The network's pretty thick. The membership has its privileges if you're in the club. So, I checked if I could join. I don't have the right last name. Went to the wrong schools. Didn't get tapped at Yale. Wasn't born in the right zip code. Guess I'll have to build my own damn membership. So, I joined a credit union and a food co-op on Maine. I downloaded Zano Wallet, got my money off their chain. I'm a member now of Freedom Forge and Temocracy Atlas 2. Our membership has

its privileges. Our membership has its privileges. We get to own our labor and keep the value we create. We get to teach our children and choose what's on their plate. We get to build the parallel systems while their empire collapses. Our membership has its privileges. Our membership has its privileges. And the dues, well, the dues are just showing up.

Another head hangs slowly. A child is slowly taken. She braided up her hair that morning. Seven years old and forsaken. The missile found the classroom roll three seconds from the door. Mother cries into the evening. The same cry she heard before. But you see tonight

where I answer my daughter in a share in a school across the sea with their moms and their coins and their head in your head. They are funding with your dollar. When you're dying, when it's your

price hit a record, the sun sold 10,000 drones. The draft is on the table now, but the tall boy stays at home. 6'8, you go to war. 6' n you're free. One inch between the body bag and the boy who holds a key. But you see it's not me. It's not my family. The sun is one inch from the draft and a million miles from the infantry

with their bombs and their clothes and their coins and their sons and their sons in your head. In your head they are falling with your daughter with your daughter with your 70 million to rebuild. where they bombed smart cities where the school used to stand. They call it the board of peace.

But peace does not have a chairman. Peace does not need your money to exist. So stop giving it to them. Every dollar. Another missile. Every dollar another drone. Every dollar. Another checkpoint. Every dollar. Another home. Every cent is a tiny bomb. Every bill is a tiny page. Every dollar that you spent tonight on a tiny grave. But you see it's not me. It's not my family.

With a dollar in my pocket built the bomb that's killed her with their t and their moms and their dogs and their coins and their sons and their sons in your head. You're not You're not Oh, your door.

Did your door. Another head hangs slowly. The child is slowly taken. She braided up her hair that morning. Ditch the dollar. Bring her home. Heat. Heat.

Welcome back to the Aaron Day Show. This is season 3, episode 11, and we are kind of we are building a theme over the last few weeks, unfortunately, as we are heading into what appears to be World War III, which is a continuation of of Trump policies that are pushing technocracy at warp speed. And in fact, the title of tonight's podcast is Operation Warp Speed 2.0. the control grid and I'm going to go through some of the developments just in the past week or so with respect to Trump's AI policy with respect to this bill in the Senate with respect to AI

pushed by Senator Blackburn his Trump's cyber policy as well as the IEA uh which is calling for essentially lockdowns based on the energy crisis created by the war in Iraq. And so we're going to put some of those pieces together tonight, which is um you know, an unfortunate set of events that is growing um and accelerating by the minute. I mean, it actually seems like we're really close to something exceptionally bad happening. I mean, oil shot up to almost $100 a barrel again. And this is despite all of these emergency measures, you know, releasing reserves, doing all of these other uh

tactics, despite all of that, despite trying to, you know, flood the market with some excess supply and so forth, uh they're not able to consistently push the price of oil down and gas is now almost $4 a gallon. And and I feel like this latest threat, Nick Trump is negotiating, you know, with himself in the mirror. You know, he's talked about the fact that he's negotiating a ceasefire. I don't think he's negotiating with anyone. I think he's put forward US terms for stopping the war. But I don't think that just because you put together what you're willing to accept, in order to have an agreement, both parties have to agree. And I don't think he's negotiating with anyone. So,

I'm seeing all kinds of news about bad things happening in the UAE and all over the place just as we're about to launch ground troops. And so, the situation is getting bad, but you know, as we talked about last week, I encourage you to I guess I don't have the image for it, but go back to season 3, episode 10. I had Craig Wkelitz on last week and we talked about the board of peace. And I think once you understand the board of peace, you will understand what is going on in the Middle East. And it's not about defending America from, you know, a nuclear attack or that Iran is two weeks away from a nuclear weapon. It's not

about liberating the people. It is about the destruction and corresponding technocratic reconstruction of these areas in the Middle East. And it's there in black and white with the Board of Peace and with the plan to rebuild Gaza. There's a 32page uh presentation about this, so there's no speculation. And they're planning on rebuilding Gaza with six AI powered smart cities with digital IDs with AI surveillance provided by Palunteer and Oracle with a digital currency

which they're actually proposing is a CBD. Well, I I it's a government regulated stable coin, which I've been calling a backdoor CBDC, but in this case, they're actually pushing the Trump family stable coin, USD1. So, I it occurred to me today. I was thinking about this, you know, so for years people have been talking about smart cities and they've been talking about 15minute cities. And we've seen these generic images and vision boards of what that might look like. Something that's kind of like a cartoon sketch drawing or whatever it happens to be, but it's still been somewhat of an abstract concept. And because it was an abstract abstract concept, people thought it was much further in the

future. And because it was being pushed by the UN or the WF, some of these global institutions, it didn't seem like it was concrete. You couldn't really pin down, okay, well, it's a 15-minute city, but how are they going to build that? Who's going to build that? For the first time, with this technocratic reconstruction of Gaza, we can see how it will actually work. We see who is implementing all the pieces. We know it's Oracle. We know it's Palanteer. We know it's USD1. We know that it is the Trump family through Jared Kushner through this uh fund and organization that he's created with money from Saudi Arabia that will be building the actual buildings. So now you know if you've

doubted what I'm saying about what technocracy looks like and this idea that you have an energy credit based system and all of this surveillance you shouldn't doubt it anymore. It's concrete. It's a plan. And thing is, in the past, usually these things were kind of worked on behind the scenes. Then they were promoted and pushed through these generic sketches and drawings. Well, they're not even hiding this. This reconstruction in Gaza was announced at a press conference at Davos of all things. So, if you want to know what's going on, the Trump family is directly along with the Wickoff family, along with the Lutnik and others, they are the ones profiting from this reconstruction. So,

our children or or us, depending upon your age, are being sent to war. We're being sent we're using American taxpayer money to destroy buildings, destroy property, and kill people. And the revitalization doesn't benefit America. It it benefits specific families and specific corporations, which is what I've been telling you technocracy is all about. It is a political ideology. It is not something that is contained or confined by national borders or part of sovereignty. It is a global movement. And now we can see exactly who's who is benefiting from it. And what Craig and I outlined last week was essentially that,

you know, we've had war profiteering forever in this country. Every war there's been war profitering. And I talked about everything from the civil war all the way up through Hallebertton and so on and so forth and the administrations and who was involved and how they were tied. But historically this kind of war profitering was done behind the scenes. And in fact they intentionally were trying to conceal it and in only in rare cases uh was it even figured out uh and only in one case with Harry Truman was anything ever actually done about it. But each war has gotten success has gotten increasingly worse in terms of the severity and the amount of corruption involved. And so most people

think of you know you know something like Dick Cheney who was a sitting vice president and was making um a million dollars a year from Hallebertton while sitting as the vice president while all of this war was going on and Hallebertton was getting all these contracts and people were outraged by that. But it's a million dollars a year. That pales in comparison to what the Trump family and the Witoffs and the Lutniks are doing publicly in press conferences. And I will say this, I've I've warned people about JD Vance and that he's a puppet for Peter Teal, but you know, there's no conflict of interest for the vice president. So there's nothing illegal about Dick Cheney making a million

dollars a year, just like there's nothing illegal about JD Vance owning part of Andro and owning part of these companies that are benefiting. That's actually perfectly legal because there's no conflict provision for the role of vice president. Now technically there is for the president, but Trump is doing something that's completely flagrant. He is the chairman for life of the board of peace. And it was just announced today that they, I believe, have directed $1.5 billion dollar of the United States taxpayer money through the uh secretary of state, through the department of state into the board of peace. The original structure for this, if you want to be a participant in the board of

peace, you have to contribute a minimum of a billion dollars. Trump has stated that the US will provide $10 billion, but he needs Congress to approve that. And frankly, at this point in time, I don't believe based on where he's at now, Congress is likely to do that. So, as with a lot of these things like the backdoor investment into Intel and so forth, he found a way to do it through the Secretary of State. So, the US as taxpayers, we have put a billion and a half dollars into an organization that he's the chair of for life. that his family and others connected to him are profiting from all of these reconstruction projects. This is technocracy. This is follow the money.

This is what's going on. So, there's no more uh mystery to it. And it's not America first. America doesn't have anything to do with it other than we're paying for it with our money and the lives uh our own lives and the lives of our children. So, that's what we're putting up, but we have no stake in the outcome. So, I encourage you to watch that episode. The episode before that, I have Dan O'Neal on and we talked about enemies of the state. Um, and I focused on Roman storm in that episode. I I have more I'm going to be doing more episodes between now and the end of May at the Libertarian National Convention where we're going to have another enemies of the state event. I'm going to be

highlighting and bringing on some others, including Roman Sterlingoff, who was sentenced to 12 and a half years in a case of actually mistaken identity. What he was convicted of shouldn't be a crime anyway. It's kind of a similar thing to Roman Storm and others, kind of a mixing service, but in his case, he didn't even actually do it. And so, I've got the good news that his appeal has at least been accepted. So, we're going to have his lawyers on to talk about this. I I heard the story uh in Manitoba and really want to share it with you guys. I just had another meeting yesterday uh with another guy from Canada who has beenounded by essentially the Canadian

version of the CIA, basically sabotaged his company, tried to poison his wife, he had to flee the country, just it's on and on and on. It's just it just continues. And so this enemies of the state event is going to be a phenomenal event. Uh, you know, I think you know, Ammon Bundy is going to be there. Afroman, I believe, is going to be there. Um, Mark Edge and, uh, Bonnie Freeman and others all be speaking. Uh, we haven't finalized exactly how the program is going to work, but, uh, we'll likely be live streaming it through multiple channels really to try to raise as much awareness about these uh, enemies of the state, of these victims of the state as possible. So, I'm really

excited and we'll be talking a lot more about that. We probably will have Dan on uh again to to walk through that. And then the episode before that, season 8, I talked about my political campaign, which is inching forward. I mean, we're about at the go no-go point on this. Um, and you know, kind of my demands. Well, actually before I say that, you can see the details on that episode, but this just came out today, this morning, New Hampshire 2026 poll. So, in the critical US Senate race, now remember from last week, the prediction markets now show that control of the Senate is basically a coin toss. In fact, the Democrats have a slight edge

now. Whereas four or five months ago, the Republicans based on the prediction markets had an 80% chance of retaining the Senate. Now they're less than 50%. And as I've been saying the entire time, New Hampshire may turn out to be the determining factor for which party ends up controlling the United States Senate. And I have influenced directly the outcome of this seat before in 2016 winning almost 18,000 votes. And the margin of error was u 1100 votes or 1700 votes, something like that. It was a it was it was a clear uh I was the clear margin of difference there because it was a four-way race with a libertarian. Well, here's the news today. The Democrat

Chris Papus is leading the Republican by 1%. It's a 4544 race. Now, they didn't poll me it. They didn't include me in the polls just as they didn't in 2016. And Emerson and UNH and Larry Sapato, who has this thing called the crystal ball, they were all wrong. They actually called the wrong outcome of the race. I don't know what it's going to take or at what point they're going to include me, but very clearly with this kind of a margin, um I I will if I'm in this race, Cenounu will lose. And at this point, based on what's going on nationally, that will cost Republicans control the US Senate. So, am I going to run? I mean, my

you know, the whole reason that I'm looking at this isn't that I think if I'm elected, I'm going to be able to fix the Senate. I'm running because Trump has not followed through on what he said he was going to do. So, you know, my my demands to to not continue to forward in the race are he needs to one take the draft off of the table. I was just watching a collage of video clips of Trump. video interview after interview, video after video, talking about how he was never going to get us into the Middle East, talking about how horrible the neocons are, how it's cost us trillions of dollars, on and on. I mean, it's not just one clip. It was one of the major components of his race. And

we've gone from that to us starting this conflict in Iran and now talking about a draft and and even changing the enlist enlistment requirements to now, you know, people up to age 42 can enlist. And if you've had a one marijuana conviction, you can now participate in the military act action. if you were forced out of the military because you declined the vaccine or whatever, you're now eligible. I mean, this is insane. This is a massive, massive violation of what he said he was going to do. The second thing is he needs to actually end the war on crypto and he needs to pardon all of these crypto prisoners of war that we talk about um on on this episode

including you know Ian Freeman and Roger Ver and Roman Storm and Roman Sterling and Kony Rodriguez and William Hill and Ray Yousef. Uh all of these guys, you know, just he did a blanket pardon of the J6 prisoners. Do a blanket pardon of these crypto prisoners of war. These are the real victims of Biden era policy. Well, with the exception of Ray Yousef, who was actually charged under Trump, but most of these are victims that are still dealing with the consequences of Biden. But Trump never slowed it down. He didn't stop the prosecutions. He didn't pardon these people. He didn't uh didn't do anything. And these are all people that promoted economic freedom,

privacy, innovation. So, that's point number two. Point number three, he needs to fire Howard Lutnik. This is out of control. If you've been listening to my podcast for months, actually at this point for over a year, I've been talking about Howard and I've been talking about, you know, predominantly his ties initially to Tether, but now it gets worse and worse and worse. Now, he was the guy that promoted uh tariffs and was all big on this while his family's firm shorted uh you know the basically bet on the uh Supreme Court overturning the tariffs, made billions of dollars on that. I heard today I need to validate this, but

it's my understanding that Lutnik, they've been talking a lot about how somebody just made a billion and a half dollars or whatever it is uh on the price of of oil on basically shorting oil immediately before Trump came out and announced this ceasefire deal, which by the way is fake. Now, I heard Alex Jones say, and I don't usually listen to Alex Jones, but I t tuned him in just to see, you know, what level of mental gymnastics he's up to today, and he's claiming that it was Lutnik uh and Lutnik's family that profited from that investment. I will certainly track that down, but I mean, at this point, the Epstein stuff on and like it's it's just so blatant that not

that we have much of a reputation left as a country. Uh this guy just, you know, he's a laughingstock. he he just makes the comp the entire country not look credible at all. So you know those are um those are the main those are the top you know points that I have and then the fourth is actually the rejection of the clarity act. Now the clarity act is the biggest surveillance bill in the United States history and no one is looking at it this way. Nobody is talking about it this way because they're looking at it as, oh, we're going to be able to have stable coins. Maybe we'll be able to, you know, earn yield on stable coins or or u uh 401ks will be able to buy my bag and so

I'm going to make a lot of money on crypto. That's not what it's about. It's about a regulatory framework for creating digital tokens that represent everything that you own. your stocks, your 401ks, your retirement plan, gold, silver, your home. All of those things will be tokenized, but will have the same level of surveillance as CBDC's. They'll be able to be tracked, programmed, and censored. That is what the legislation is all about. This is how you will own nothing. And it's a horrible piece of legislation. And I, you know, I've there is nothing less competent than crypto bros with their fora into crypto. I've never seen anything less expertly pulled off in my

life. These people got a lot of money in crypto, knew nothing about politics, then paid a bunch of consultants $2,000 an hour to basically sabotage everything that they were doing. And then at some point they have so much money in it to save face they'll do anything to just get anything done so that they don't look like the morons that they are. It is exceptionally bad. So not only is everything that we own going to be surveiled and controlled by third parties. They're not even getting the yield that they want. So this is going to end up being a big win for the banks. It's going to be a big win for all of the intermediaries that are involved with commodities and securities.

And then maybe like one or two crypto exchanges will benefit and every individual will get screwed. Real time transaction our transactions will be monitored in real time. Our transaction history will be able to be reconstructed. This information will be sent and uh shared with multiple departments of the federal government and with foreign central banks. So that bill needs to stop. The Clarity Act is the war on crypto. The crypto prisoners of war still being incarcerated or facing incarceration. That is the war on crypto. The only thing that I'm saying to Trump the and what would get me out of this race is if he did what he said he was going to do, take the draft off

the table, get the most corrupt person in his cabinet out of the administration, free the crypto prisoners of war, and stop with the Clarity Act, which is the biggest piece of surveillance legislation. So that's what all this hinges on. And you know, time is running out. And once I'm in, I'm in. And when I'm in, I'm, you know, I'm not going to hold back. When I ran in 2016, I didn't have a website. I didn't raise any money and I didn't campaign. I fully intend to do workshops and speeches and town hall meetings across the entire state. And people are going to learn about technocracy. And I'm going to teach people or remind people to relearn something that they've

forgotten, which is that our rights don't come from government. Our rights don't come from Washington DC. and that we can take those back by not complying. Not that I'm going to go to Washington DC and fix Washington DC, but that they can improve their own lives by not using the dollar, by exiting the health care system. That they are not stuck with these fake choices between politicians and rigged parties. They have the ability to choose what they want to do with their own energy, their own resources, and their own time. That's what the race is going to be about. And if you are John Eenu and you were and you were a deciding vote on TARP and the Patriot Act and

Real ID and then you became a WEF board member and then became a lobbyist. Everything that I've been talking about three and a half years, every interview, every article, every book, every meme, every song, this guy is who I'm talking about. So, it's not going to be a fun time for John Eenounu if this moves forward. Uh, I do want to say I want to thank everybody that has continued to recommend me on other podcasts. I've said this many times. I've never I don't have a marketing team. It's me. And I've never reached out to anyone to get onto a podcast. So, all of the shows that we've ever been on and it's now it's just a vast massive list. It seems

like I'm doing a lot of repeat interviews all the time and going on a lot of different shows multiple times. All of that came uh from from you guys recommending me or from them finding clips of of this show. So I want to thank you for that and you know show you these are some of the ones I just yesterday it was released. I did an interview Steve Patterson and I did an interview with Katherine Austin Fitz. Um, Stephen and I also had the interview with Brett Weinstein, which I thought was a great one on on the hijacking of Bitcoin. There was also Jake Shields. I was on with Alex Newman. Um, and on and on and on. And there are some other big big interviews coming up over the next

month. And there's there's stuff I can't talk about yet, but over the next 90 to 180 days, this is really building. And I will say even the shadowban seems to have been lifted even on my account. I've been getting anywhere from two to four million views a week on X, which is just way way above um where I've I've ever been. So, the word is getting out. And so, I'm really grateful for everyone that has helped to spread the word and to help introduce this to others. And keep it up if you've got other shows that you think I I would be a good fit for. Um they don't have to be huge shows. I actually like shows where, you know, you know, whoever is is running the show, it's their show. It's their

content. They're not captured. They have their own audience and they are there as an authentic voice representing themselves and they've built their own following. And that doesn't have to be a huge audience. Um I I I I value authenticity over over anything else. And so um I'm not just shooting for the larger and larger shows. Uh I just we want to keep getting the word out there because we are at the end stages of this again. Real ID backdoor CBDC's the board of peace on the verge of World War II and what I'm going to talk about tonight. We don't have much time left. So with that said, I'll now get into tonight's topic which is Operation Warp Speed 2.0. So in 2020, they told us that

Operation Warp Speed was about saving lives. Of course, once again, here was Trump as the main guy delivering that message. They bypassed every safeguard. They rammed it through. There was no debate, no scrutiny. Anyone who asked questions was deemed anti-science. 330 million people got the product. And in 2026, the same thing is happening again, but the product is not a vaccine. This time, the product is the entire technocratic control grid. So we're talking about energy, voting, artificial intelligence, cyber warfare. There's four systems, but it's really one technocratic architecture. And they're building it once again at warp speed, but while mega while MEA, I

was going to say sleeps, but is actually complicit with what's going on. In many cases, celebrate this. So, tonight it's just going to be me, no guest, but I'm going to walk through um you know, 30 or so slides that walk through some of these major initiatives that are going on. And this is above and beyond all of the stuff that I've been talking about. This is not another regurgitation of the Clarity Act or Genius. This is all different. These are all different policies, AI policies, cyber policies, and so forth. And a lot of this is new within the last week and people need to be aware of it because this stuff is being pushed out while we're now distracted by war.

So, um this is these are kind of the key facts of this. So, we have the IEA uh talking about sheltering us from oil shocks and coming out with their 10-point plan on March the 20th. And that was just a little less than a week ago. We have the Save America Act, which I know a lot of people are going to be pissed off if they hear about it. Oh no, we've got to fix voting. And I'll talk about my thoughts on this, but I even said, you know, at the early part of Trump's election, I mean, they're going to end up pushing digital ID and everything, and they'll use voting, and Maggot will cheer it on, and they'll say, "Oh, this is great. We need this for voting." And and sure enough, this

is kind of how this is being pushed and and all of this is is being cobbled together. We have Trump's America AI Act, which is 291 pages that was dropped on March the 18th, so just a little over a week ago. And then we have Trump's Cyber Strategy, which is a short document that was released on March the 6th. Um, so the presentation I'm doing tonight is based on the these original source documents. So there's no like I'm not providing you an analysis of somebody else's analysis. I'm telling you what's in the actual documents themselves. And in the show notes, I provided I believe links. I guess it depends on which channel, but there are links to all of the original source

material so you can look at this yourself. But let's start with the IEA, the International Energy Agency, which was founded in 1974 as a response to the Arab oil embargo. So there are 31 member uh countries. It's headquartered in Paris. And the people participating in this are not elected by anyone. They they don't answer to any voter, but they write energy policies and make recommendations that governments treat as gospel. So their current executive director is uh Fati Barroll, a Turkish economist who's been pushing the net zero transition harder than essentially any pol politician on earth.

He is a key partner of the World Economic Forum in the UN funded by government contributions. This means your tax dollars. And so last week they published a document that basically reads like COVID lockdowns for energy. So let's let's dig into this. I I actually put out a post about this while I was traveling last week, but it's essentially their 10-point plan that they call sheltering from oil shocks. So this is kind of like the similar language that they even use during CO. Um, but when they did that, you know, Brent crude went to $120 a barrel after the straight up hormuz was closed and then, you know, it's dropped and gone up back and forth based on basically

posturing. Otherwise, it would be going straight up. Uh, but their solution is a 10-point plan that you can see here on the screen, but I'll read it since I know a lot of you aren't actually watching this. um mandatory energy rationing for residents and businesses. We have uh vehicle use restricted only to essential services only. Public transportation capacity reduced by 50% remote workers required for all non-critical sectors. um strict limits on travel distance, immediate suspension of international flights, uh nationalized distribution of fuel and essential goods, curfews and restricted movement, increased surveillance for uh

non-compliance and temporary closure of non-essential industries. Now again this isn't something that has you know legal uh weight uh but these are recommendations that governments typically follow kind of like what happened with COVID policy. Oh the IEA said this we've got an emergency and I haven't vetted all of this but you're already seeing in many countries uh China has massive gas lines. I I hear Australia might actually be the first to have lockdowns, which here we go again. They were uh one of the worst countries when it came to COVID lockdowns and vaccine mandates. India, South Korea, other countries in a very desperate situation. All of Europe,

Europe already had tremendously high uh gas prices even before all of this. And so this is a a real situation that is getting worse by the day. And people are talking about California may soon have issues. Certainly, it's not a crisis. I just saw before starting this podcast a tweet in my feed with, you know, Trump saying, "Well, we have more oil in this country and that country. We'll just drill baby drill that again." But, you know, again, it takes time to ramp all of this stuff up. And uh we are certainly not immune from from any of this. And the and the interesting thing is remember the basis of technocracy is that you flip the economy from being a pricebased

system based on supply and demand to a system based on energy credits. The whole purpose of it is an energy credit based system. Look at what's going on. This is how you get to an energy creditbased system. you essentially um you know contain and push and and all of your policy for all economic activity around oil. And so eventually you could see and I've talked about this in different iterations but you could have you know a stable coin or CBDC's and then eventually that moves to a global digital currency and the backing of that digital currency ends up being energy credits that ends up being what backs a global technocratic system. This is the vision of technocracy

from the out from the outset. And so we are literally living that right now, you know, and for so long people when I've been talking about this and even when I wrote about this in, you know, in 2023 in my book, you know, I I talked about ways that this might happen, how a combination of CBDC's and the tokenization of assets could lead to a centralized system where energy credits are controlled. this is a pretty fast track way of going about getting there. And so again, I I've never predicted the exact timing or how it's going to happen. I've always said there are any number of emergencies that can can push it. But considering what's going on, you know, we've targeted Iranian oil, then

Iran Iran has lashed out against other countries and destroyed other oil capacity. Then we have our own issues with, you know, things in taxes, so forth being on fire. And then we saw Ukraine attack a Russian oil facility. So we have, you know, oil oil fields and oil producing uh assets being destroyed all over the planet, not even just confined to Iran. What a great way to create an emergency around energy and to use that as a forcing function for transitioning the economy to a system based on energy credits. So, nevertheless, this is again where we are whether we like it or not. Now, this is the CO playbook energy

edition. So, what was CO all about? Stay home. Don't travel. Trust the experts. We'll tell you what it's safe. Well, what's going on with this energy thing? Work from home. Don't drive. Don't fly. Trust the IEA will manage your energy. The thing that frustrates me about, you know, a lot of people say, "Well, we've learned and we learned from the lockdowns and we learned from CO." I disagree. I don't think we learned at all because people still believe that CO was about a few bad actors. They're not understanding that it is a systemic problem and that we're actually fighting a political ideology. And there there are people that are actually pushing this agenda that people continue to not

want to believe that. They want to continue to believe that this was an isolated incident. We're going to come in and we're going to bring in the Avengers and we're going to do everything else. This has been worked on for almost a century. And this really accelerated starting in 1974 with the trilateral commission and their influence on the UN which led to UN agenda 2030. They have been changing the laws through trade deals through in the United States the department of congress but excuse me the department of commerce but doing this in other countries in Europe, Asia and North America. They have been changing uh and eroding our sovereignty to allow multinational

corporations to push towards this for 50 years now just as I said at the introductory remarks. Now it's no longer a generic concept of a 15-minute city. Now it's, oh wait, it's actually Palunteer, it's Oracle. Here are the specific pieces of technology that are being implemented. Here are who the players are. And so I have said from the very beginning, um, I'm seeing a comment here. Did you write the Brownstone article I read today? I don't know. I did not write it, but I know that the post that I did about this was picked up all over the place. I know Shannon and Joy picked it up. I know Jeffrey Tucker retweeted it. So it I didn't write the article, but some of this content might

be uh referenced in in the article. So the IA says avoid air travel where alternatives exist. And so 20 to 40% of aviation is work travel. So just keep that in mind. And now I was traveling. So I was traveled all last week and I will say that we had no issues. In fact, surprisingly, in Boston at Logan Airport and at the Tampa airport, it was probably the fastest experience we've had all year through TSA. So, it was kind of miraculous. I've noticed if you're in Houston or Atlanta or if you're in New Orleans or some of these other places, it's been an absolute disaster. And it looks like it's getting

worse. But um you know, we didn't see that that particular situation. But now I'm hearing you're seeing that some airlines are starting to cut service. Um and you're going to see more and more of that. So this is this is real. And unfortunately, even if there was some ceasefire or resolution today, some of the damage that's been done to infrastructure will take months or years to stabilize and get back to back to normal. So, so in any event, 20 to 40% of aviation is work travel. Speed limit reductions cut fuel use by 5 to 10%. And so, remote work mandates could clear uh car oil demand by 2 to six%. So, so

this is back just at a point where, you know, companies are actually starting to try to implement go come back to work, come back to the office policies. this this hits. And by the way, it's going to be really hard to try to convince your employees to go back to the office if they have to pay $5 a gallon for gas or more. So, it'll be interesting to watch and see what happens and what that friction looks like. So, the numbers might sound reasonable until you realize it. Again, it's the same uh playbook. Restrict, mandate, control, and repeat. And just like co the people writing the rules will never follow them themselves. You will not see politicians. You will still see the same

jets going back and forth to Davos. You will see the same politicians flying back and forth. This is not for the elite technocrats. It is for the commoners. And and understand once you understand this technology as a technocracy, excuse me, as a political ideology, you'll understand that because people say, "Well, but we have our constitutional rights." the system that they're implementing does not recognize individual rights or property rights. You have to re understand that and you have to put your head around that that the people in power including Trump and including this current administration do not care about the Constitution. They don't care about individual rights. They

actually don't care about America first either. They are monetizing this themselves. Not for the benefit of the country but for the benefit of themselves. The project that is going to revitalize Gaza is not owned by the United States of America. It has shareholders and we are not amongst the list despite the fact that we are the ones that leveled Gaza and everything else. And I will say one more quick thing on the Gaza front. If you were uh living in Gaza in the you know largest open air prison and your home was destroyed, you don't get your home back. You don't get your property back. you will get a digital token that gives you certain rights that you can sell. And

one of the rights might be that you get to pay, you know, $1,750 a month to be in one of these uh you're basically swapping the open air prison for a digital prison, but you've lost any sense of property rights or ownership, and they're using tokenization. So, I know a lot of people didn't understand what I was talking about with tokenization. This is what's happening. This is the exact plan that's being implemented. So, uh, they're really their real goal is going to be to displace 2.3 million people in Gaza and they will use tokenization and technocracy and technocratic control systems to do it. So, anyway, this is just the opener. Now, let's talk about

um voting. So this is so again I wasn't g I the IEA thing was just a little brief thing that I wanted to talk about but the main thing I want to talk about tonight are the Save America Act and Trump's AI policy and the cyber policy. So the Save America Act passed the House 218 to 213 and the Senate debate started on March the 17th. So, on the surface, uh, you need documented proof of citizenship to register to vote, voter ID to vote in person and by mail. And it sounds reasonable, right? I mean, who could be against voter basic voter integrity? But read the bill um, introduced by,

it's 29 pages introduced by Chip Roy out of Texas. It puts the Department of Homeland Security at the center of voter verification. the DHS, the same department that labeled parents at schoolboard meetings domestic terrorists, the same department that ran disinformation governance boards. This is the department that will get to determine who gets to vote. So again, and and I want to take a step back because, you know, Elon Musk is pushing this as if fixing the elections is somehow going to fix the country. I want to remind you that Republicans have complete control right now of the House and the Senate and of the Supreme Court and of the executive branch. How's it going?

What So what is it you think is going to happen even if you fix the voting? And I'm going to say this and this is going to piss a lot of people off. This doesn't this is just like the false belief that Trump and the Avengers could or would fix America. This is another way of denying personal responsibility and continuing to comply and hope on strategies that make no sense if you actually think them through. The problem that we have is not whether illegal aliens are voting in our elections. We fundamentally have a problem of twothirds of Americans can't identify the three branches of government. We have zero to low information voters, not

of illegal voters, of actual legal American citizens that will be in this DHS controlled system and voting. They know nothing. One of the original voting requirements was that you actually had to own property. You had to have a stake in the outcome. That is no longer the case. We're at the point where we're we're appreaching we're approaching a point where more people are dependent on the government than not dependent on the government. So I'm sorry having a massive dependent class that has low to no information will not produce better results just because you put in place photo ID and have this run

through the Department of Homeland Service. I I just want to point that out because if you believe Elon, oh this is if we don't do this, you know, America's lost. This isn't going to solve anything. It's another distraction to give you hope rather than acknowledging the truth, which is that the system is systemically flawed and corrupt, and that we need to exit and build. So, I'm not going to spend a lot of time with people arguing with people about, oh, well, yeah, this is going to fix everything, but even still, if you wanted to look at it, you can see what is going to happen with the bill itself. So, again, fairly short bill on the surface, but it gives control to the

DHS. Well, let's look at the save database. So, the save database is uh systematic alien verification of eligibility. So this bill requires states to run every voter registration through the DHS save database. This means the federal government maintains a database of every registered voter in America cross reference with DHS immigration records. So this isn't voter ID. It's a federal voter identity system with DHS as a gatekeeper. And there are criminal penalties for officials who register voters without citizenship proof. So private right of action citizens can sue. They're not protecting elections. They're centralizing them. And look, this is the problem. And I knew this was

going to happen with Trump supporters. At the very beginning, people didn't like digital ID. People were complaining about Clash Schwab. They're complaining about the WEF, but boy, it'll be certainly easy to do. Now, they'll jump to do it if it's for elections. And so, this is going to end up being, well, what is your photo ID going to be? Well, the photo ID will end up being your real ID. What is the real ID? The real ID is a digital ID. And what is Real ID going to be integrated with? It's going to be integrated with what Palunteer is doing, which is integrating federal government databases thanks to Doge. So now all of the information is going to be consolidated and centrally controlled

through the federal government using AI. If you think that is a good idea, you don't have the first clue of what liberty is about. If you think that because it's Trump that somehow e even if you still at this point are naive enough to believe that Trump is on our side and is going to save Western civilization, which I have no idea how you hold that view at this point, but if you did hold that view, what will happen when this system is put in place and somebody that you don't believe in? What happens if Gavin Newsome is the president or Camala Harris is the president and all of this information is centralized? We already know some of the activities that DHS has been involved

with in the past. Do you think that DHS is now a more moral organization that follows the rule of law? And I I mean just basic question and do you think that and if you do believe that which is kind of shocking, do you believe that will continue in the future? This kind of centralization is incredibly dangerous, particularly in light of what else is going on with digital currencies, the Clarity Act and AI surveillance. And so, this is why, you know, I didn't want to spend a huge amount of time on this, but I did want to highlight the the fact that this kind of centralization and control under DHS, are you guys thinking about that when

you're blindly cheering this on? Have you actually gone back to put your your history cap on and gone back to the history of the Department of of of the of Homeland Security and its founding after 911 and everything that it was supposed to do, everything that it has done, how it's violated our rights. Are you really excited about that? Now, you could say that we should have some form of voter ID. um maybe it's left to the states, maybe it's some other kind of system, but the idea that that that it has to be controlled by DHS makes absolutely no sense to me. So,

um so this is essentially what what we're looking at in with the save with the save act. Um, you know, in this instance, 21.3 million voting age Americans lack easy access to citizenship documents. So, the bill requires a passport alone or birth certificate plus photo ID. That's it. There are no other options. So, passport cost $130. A uh certified birth certificate varies by state. um you know 12% of registered voters lack the required combination of passport or birth certificate plus photo ID uh if you are poor rural elderly or born in a state with bad records um this

could be problematic this could lead to actual disenfranchisement so this is not a a clear clear case situation now of course at the same time I mean I as much as I say that I also go back to arguing you know the the fact that that you We have so many people that are dependent on the government and and they vote. We have I think where we went wrong on this was a long long time ago and you can't put the genie back in the bottle and this particular issue is not going to again fix the the underlying problem with elections or how the political system works at all. So, in any event, um, all right, let's let's go on to uh

the Trojan horse riders. So, this is what Trump demanded that they added that they add to this bill. Trump was not satisfied with voter ID. He demanded the Senate add a ban on mail-in voting except military and illness. Um, so you know, Senator Eric Schmidt introduced an amendment bundling a whole bunch of things into this, uh, including a ban on transgender, uh, women and women's sports, prohibition on gender affirming surgery for minors, um, which that stuff may or may not be good, but but again, it's cobbled into uh, this bill. So, this is another one of these things. And we also have a housing bill that has some CBDC language

in it. I mean, this is just typical. This is just the typical Washington DC thing where a whole bunch of stuff is crammed crammed in. These are, you know, probably things that should be voted on independently. So, the other element of this is it's another unfunded mandate. So, the states are required to fund this, but it is under the control of DHS. So the SAVE act provides zero federal funding for implementation. So the states are responsible for building the verification infrastructure and then connecting that to DHS and then processing the citizen documents, handling all of the lawsuits from private right of action all on their own dime. So it's another uh encroachment on

states. So the federal government gets a national vot voter database and the states get the bill. I can imagine how this could be weaponized in elections. I mean, you know, I've stated this I did we my wife and I did a whole podcast on, you know, why voting doesn't matter. But one of the things that I've been arguing is people have no idea how voting actually works. It's all about get out the vote. And the parties have these massive databases of information on voters and they use that information. They have hundreds of data points now on every single voter. They know how much money you make. They know your magazine subscriptions. They

they know where you likely stand on political issues. So the centralization of this data I could completely see whoever is in charge, whoever is in power at the time using getting access to this data in conjunction with the Palunteer data and everything else and using it uh to their advantage in elections. This will actually give the status quo party more control over the election process itself. And to understand what I mean by that, you need to, you know, look at how these elections work and how they operate and how these get out the vote uh technologies and infrastructures work. And the Democrats

have dominated on this because under Obama, they really took the lead in building this out and using technology to target voters. Trump won in 2016 in part because he was aided by Palunteer. This was part of the support that Peter Teal gave which actually leveled the playing field. What we're going to have now is a situation which whatever party is in control is probably going to manipulate and use this centralized information to the benefit of their party which will affect state races down ballot as well. So, you know, I mean, in their debates on this with election integrity, um, you know, according to Heritage Foundation, there are 77 cases of

non-citizen voting over 24 years. Now, this is obviously a highly highly debated uh area right now, but there is a question of um how much is this actually going to affect, how much is this going to uh really change the outcome? When they built the TSA, they said it was about 19 hijackers. Remember that? 25 years later, every American gets scanned, groped, or tracked every time they fly. 900 million passengers a year. And it was stated that this was because of 19 hijackers. And that's if you even believe that that story was true. And now look at where we are. And by the way, talk about the Overton window shifting. I mean, we actually went to the point, this is insane. people are now

the fact that people are sympathetic of TSA agents, the fact that there I saw this in some of these places where there's really long lines. TSA agents are raising money from the public to pay their salaries. We've lost the plot. The TSA shouldn't exist. The TSA is a has not prevented any terrorism at all. It is a massive surveillance operation. So, we have been gas lit. I don't know what you know, Stockholm syndromes, whatever you want to call this now. But we're now getting to the point where people are sympathetic for TSA agents. And now you have Elon Musk offering to pay, which is classic. Oh, let's make him the hero. He can pay for our unnecessary surveillance. Oh, he's a great guy. And

now he's bailed out these great people at the TSA. This is how completely backwards all of this is. Anyway, they want to do something similar with voting. So, small threat, massive system, permanent infrastructure is basically what's going on with this. So, I I'm not against the idea of voter ID. I am against the idea of the consolidation of power at the hands of the federal government paid for by the states particularly in light of what's going on with Real ID and Palunteer and all of the other surveillance and all of the other technocratic systems that are being put in place. So this is that's my main point on all of this. Um,

so the Save Act needs 60 votes in the Senate to overcome the filibuster. They don't have them. So, what's the plan? Budget reconciliation. Uh, frame voter verification requirements as conditions for federal election funding. And by the way, I've been working on this podcast and I did a whole bunch of other stuff today. So, there may be an update on this. So, if somebody has more updated information today, uh, please let me know. I just had didn't have time to check whatever the latest is, but it's a similar thing. It's um you know, they can pass it with 51 votes, no debate, no filibuster. This is exactly how they passed Operation Warp Speak. Bypass the safeguards, ram

it through, tell people it's for their protection. So, this is essentially what we're looking at here. And so, this is the voter ID that they actually built. So again, I'm not against the concept of voter ID. I'm con I'm against the consolidation of power by the federal government and especially the Department of Homeland Security, which is another thing. You know, we got TSA and DHS. I remember when DHS was formed and they consult, what was that guy's name? Tom something from Pennsylvania. Tom Ridge, wasn't he the first head of this? I mean, this the DHS has been an absolute disaster from uh the very beginning of

this. But um but again, there's a difference between showing your ID at a local polling place and having every voter registration in America cross referenced through a federal surveillance apparatus. So again, we need to make we have to have nuance and an understanding of of these things. So often bills get passed. Again, the Patriot Act was until the Clarity Act probably the largest piece of surveillance legislation. The Genius Act, all of these bills have these names, but the names do not correspond with what's going on. So, if you call it Save America, you call it about voter ID. Yeah. Well, what if you called it the, you know, um DHS controlled centralized database,

uh federal surveillance act? What if you called it that? Would you like it then? Of course not. So, people do want voter integrity, but they but they don't want to know what's actually in these bills. So, I'm not going to spend a lot more time on that, but I just encourage you to look at and read the bills. Again, the links to the bills are in the show notes, but look at what's in the bill and and ask yourself, maybe there's a way to have voter integrity and voter ID without subscribing to a federal government centralized system because you I've done this and I've gone through this with other aspects. I've talked about the history of financial surveillance and financial surveillance

legislation. It only goes one way. This stuff never gets reversed. It never uh gets repealed. It only becomes more cumbersome and then the narrative in the whole window shifts. So this is the voting part of this. Now let's talk about AI. So we had um Marsha Blackburn drop a 291page discussion draft called the Trump America AI Act. So, she she dropped this on March the 18th and then two days after that, uh, March the 20th, this is where I say, you know, I I was I was on vacation and I was, you know, still on my iPad and I

actually put out some posts on this and I saw that these bills dropped and I'm like, wow. You know, once again, kind of like the Clarity Act where they were dropped and then people the, you know, members of Congress, the senators only had 36 hours to re review it and read it, which of course they didn't and then there were two versions of it. This is exactly what's happening here. Most people don't know that these 29 this 291 page bill was even dropped, right? This is what they did with the Patriot Act. It's it's what they did with the 2,000 pages of the Affordable Act. It's Care Act. It's what they did with the CARES Act. just drop it in the middle of a war, in the middle of everything else

that's going on, in the middle of a government shutdown. You know what we need? We need a 291 page Trump America AI Act followed by the White House AI framework, which is short. That document is only four pages long, which is problematic in itself because of the leeway uh that it gives. So, I'm going to talk about some of the highle points of both of these. And first I'm going to say they even though they were released 48 hours apart, they don't even agree with their own story. Um try Trump's White House framework says AI training on copyrighted material is not copyright infringement. So this is a massive gift to big tech. You can train on anything, pay nothing. The Blackburn bill uh title

15 says the opposite. AI training is not fair use. Creators must be compensated. So again, there's not complete agreement on all this. Although where there is agreement is is probably, you know, the worst part of both of these documents. But again, nobody's reading this. Everyone's asleep. And the the implications of these bills are absolutely massive. So Trump's December 2025 executive order created a an AI litigation task force inside the Department of Justice. And so their job is to sue states that pass AI regulation on commerce clause grounds.

So on preeemption uh grounds. Now note there's a common theme here uh with Trump which is the massive consolidation of power by the federal government and this is this is what we've seen across the board with digital currencies with all these other things. It's a massive power grab by the federal government and they're jumping in and doing this with AI. So, for instance, Colorado passed an algorithmic discrimination law and the executive order specifically called that out as problematic. So, if your state tries to protect you from AI discrimination in hiring, lending, or healthcare, the DOJ sues your state. I mean, you know,

it's probably a stupid law in I'm not going to defend the Colorado law, but this is more of a question of of states rights or or not. But the commerce secretary, no, the commerce secretary Howard Lutnik has 90 days to identify ownorous state AI laws and refer them to the DOJ for legal challenge. So, we're going to go back to everything that I've said. One of my four conditions for not running in this race is firing Howard Lutnik. This guy has a massive amount of power. He has been involved and is the biggest beneficiary directly of the genius act. His his firm Cander Fitzgerald is heavily and

directly involved and will be one of the biggest beneficiaries of the clarity act which will be involved in the tokenization of all of our assets. And in fact, that firm is trying to get involved in tokenizing the national assets of the United States, the land of the United States and others and tokenizing it. He's right in the middle of that. And now that plus tariffs and now he's in the middle of AI policy. He himself, he has the power, Howard Lutnick, to identify ownorous state AI laws and refer them to the DOJ for legal challenge. You know, I said to somebody yesterday, if you had five full-time people, you

still couldn't keep up with all of the conflict of interest and corruption going on at Ker Fitzgerald. It is massive in scale. You know, this is one of these areas where I haven't even thought of what what is what is Lutnik's involvement and what are their investments in AI. And I still haven't looked into it yet, but I'm sure when I do look into it, we're going to have a whole podcast on that because uh it's never turned out to be a situation where there wasn't a massive conflict of interest and then you're sitting there scratching your head head saying, "Wow, how did uh how did that happen?" So, here's kind of the timeline on this. Trump signed the executive order

December the 11th, 2025. DOJ AI litigation task force was created within 30 days. Commerce Secretary Lutnik must identify owner of state AI laws within 90 days. Uh the Colorado algorithmic discrimination law was explicitly targeted. And so that's one part of what's going on. And then we have, and this is very disturbing, the I'll call it the killing free speech infrastructure. Title three of the Blackburn bill sunsets section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Two years after enactment, it's gone. So, I want to remind you that section 230 is why independent platforms exist. So, whether you're talking about Rumble or Substack, etc., uh, it's what allows platforms to

be able to host user content without being sued into Oblivion for that content. So it allows you to be a platform where you're not considered to be the editor or the creator of the content. You are just simply a platform that allows the content to exist. This is this is a a hugely beneficial situation. So every small platform becomes liable for every user post, every comment, every review once section 230 goes away, defamation, so on and so forth on down the line. And I will tell you, having been involved in a defamation case myself, uh, and having spent time for not committing defamation, but for what they call conspiracy to commit defamation, you can actually get sued for retweeting

somebody else's defamatory statement. I don't know if you were aware of that or not. You could actually be charged with conspiracy to commit defamation for retweeting somebody else's defamatory statement. Now imagine if section 230 were eliminated. I the the that would then force all of these platforms to put in place editorial control to review and evaluate everything that goes out. Now of course what are you going to do? How are you going to do that? You're going to use AI. So this isn't deregulation. This is a big mo just for big tech that's disguised as accountability. And you want to know who wrote this provision of the Blackburn bill? It was none other

than Lindsey Graham. So jot that down. So in summary, the key facts are section 230 sunsets two years after enactment thanks to Senator Lindsey Graham's language. It eliminates the liability shield for third-party content that's been in place since 1996. And without it, platforms are liable for every user post, comment, or review. So, I bet you probably didn't know that this was in the works. Now, it actually gets worse. And again, what you're hearing is the overall theme here is all of this is just about more and more and more consolidation of power in the hands of

the federal government. And this is very critical if you're pushing technocracy because technocracy is ultimately a global system and it's all about complete consolidation of all these systems. So department of energy approval is required for AI deployment. So in other words, a new AI model cannot be released unless it is given the green light by the department of energy. Title six, the Department of Energy must evaluate any advanced AI system trained using more than 10 to the 28th operations. Maybe that's 26th. Let me see. 26th operations. These glasses are

good for some things, not for others. So, in other words, you can't deploy that system until the DOE has completed its review. This gives the federal government the complete kill switch on any advanced AI deployment. Not big tech, not the the market. The Department of Energy singularly has that control. Now, I want you to think about this again. The basis of technocracy is energy credits. We are moving into a situation right now where oil is going through the roof. We're talking about energy lockdowns. And now we are giving control over whether or not AI models can be released to the Department of Energy

which has control over this entire energy issue. Isn't that interesting? I bet you're probably surprised to hear that this Trump AI policy gives this power to the Department of Energy. So what they're evaluating for is loss of control scenarios and weaponization by adversaries. So deployment is prohibited until the developer complies. Well, who decides what counts as an advanced system or not? Who sets the threshold? The same government that's suing states for regulating AI is now gatekeeping all of AI deployment itself.

So, I've been saying for a long time I there's there's a big dis this this kind of thing has actually been going on for a long time. I've I've said on many podcasts, we have this thing called the Invention Secrecy Act, which was passed in 1952. And essentially, this gives the government the ability to when you submit a patent, kind of screen it first, and then they can basically shove your invention to the point where you can't even talk about your invention or it's an automatic 10 or 20 years in federal prison. and they can use national security and economic security as a justification for it. And they consult with different federal uh

federal departments on this. One of the main areas, there have been over 5,000 inventions suppressed under this act. The main area is the Department of Energy, but I mean it could work something like this. Let's just say hypothetically the head of the Department of Energy is a former oil executive, you know, from Exon Mobile or whatever. And this isn't, you know, this happens. This is usually how it works. And it's determined that a new invention is a threat to economic security because the oil companies lobby and say, "Well, this is going to cost a lot of jobs." So, as a result, they shove truly innovative technology because the very companies that capture the regulatory

agencies use this invention secrecy act to do it. This is the same thing that we're talking about here with AI. this is going to be used to keep out incumbents. And already today, I saw that there's a new tech board that's been formed. Um, I don't know if it's specifically about AI. I think it is AI is a big component of it. And I didn't catch all the details, but Elon Musk is out. Sam Alman is out, but Mark Zuckerberg and Larry Ellison are in. Now, remember, Trump was actually saying and calling for Zuckerberg's imprisonment before the election. Now all of a sudden Zuckerberg has a key appointment on this committee. This is all corruption and the use of

the federal government to pick winners and losers and completely and fully manipulate these markets. But I'm going to add to all of this that the problem is that AI the United States isn't leading in technology anymore. We're losing to China in almost all categories. And I'm telling you, as soon as this Deep Seek 4 model comes out, we're going to be behind an AI. So, this is going to be one of these things where we're now shooting ourselves in the foot. This kind of regulation doesn't work. It's not going to prevent innovation. And even the language that they're trying to use. Well, you know, they're evaluating for loss of control scenarios and weaponization by

adversaries. Well, what's built into even that framing is the assumption that you think that we have the cutting edge technology to begin with. But if we don't have the cutting edge technology to begin with, how is that in our national interest? How is it in our national interest if people will no longer want to actually create or deploy AI models here because they know at the end of the day it's going to be up to the Department of Energy or the Department of Commerce to determine u whether or not your policies are legitimate or whether your techn is legitimate. People will not create things here. We already have a brain drain. We've already had the brain drain in crypto.

We've already had the brain drain in healthcare as I talk about with medical tourism where top doctors are already leaving here to go to other countries where they can actually practice medicine without the ridiculous laws and regulations and uh compliance and malpractice insurance and everything else that they have to deal with with the existing system that we have here. The fact that the government now controls and is the largest payer for health care. Now we're going to do that to AI. were already just about to lose the lead and now they're going to consolidate this under the Department of Energy. Absolutely mind-boggling that this is going on. Now, it doesn't end there. And I think it was

it wasn't last week, but maybe it was I think it might have been when we did one of the technocracy roundts on free speech. I had talked about some of the things that Biden and Harris had done uh in terms of trying to shape and force AI companies to uh comply with certain guidelines for kind of content moderation. Well, we now have in this bill government defined truth in annual political bias audits on AI. So this is title eight. Providers of high-risk AI systems must undergo annual third-party audits for political bias. The Federal Trade Commission establishes the ethics training curriculum. Every

covered entity must complete it annually. So listen to that again. The FTC defines what counts as politically biased AI. and the government defines truth. This is not fighting censorship. This is federalizing censorship. This is centralizing censorship. So instead of big tech deciding what's true, the FTC decides what's true. >> And we're supposed to cheer because it says anti-onsservative bias in the title. What do you think again? I don't even know what that means. I

have no idea what conservative means right now. Does conservative mean you add 10 trillion dollars to the national debt in five years as president of the United States? Does conservative mean going to war and launching World War II and extending the military budget to beyond a trillion dollars? What aspect of conser I don't even know what they think anti-conservative bias means? But it may be anti-conservative bias now under Trump's FTC chair. But what do you think it's going to mean? All it's going to do is go back and forth. We are given giving the federal government the ability to centrally censor everything and whichever

administration is in control is going to be what determines what gets censored. This is a an idiotic idea. Completely idiotic idea. And Elon Musk did not save free speech and Trump did not save free speech at all. Now, there was that great, you know, Supreme Court Biden versus Missouri case or whatever. Uh there was that that just prevailed. But you know what? All of that gets knocked out by this more and more centralization. This is absolutely incredible. Then there's the liability bomb. Under this bill, you can sue AI developers for everything. So, title seven classifies AI systems as products.

That means you can sue developers for defective design, failure to warn, property damage, mental anguish, death, illness, and financial injury. The attorney general, state AGs, and private citizens can all file suit. So, who survives this? not startups, not open-source developers, and not small companies building tools in their garage. Google, Microsoft, Meta, they have armies of lawyers. Everyone else gets litigated out of existence. And if you don't believe that, I've got a list of podcast and interviews that I've done with open-source developers, people like Roman Storm. Two weeks ago, the episode was about Roman Storm. Roman Storm uh has had to raise over $5 million

to fight the government. He wasn't independently wealthy. He was an entrepreneur. Came to this country with $500 in his wallet. Got an opinion letter, got advice from lawyers, not an opinion letter, stating that what he was doing did not require a money transmitter license. His investor also had their lawyer state that he didn't need it and they prosecuted him anyway. and he's had to raise over $5 million to fight the case. And then when he ended up having, you know, a kind of a hung jury on two of the big charges, um he it looked like he was looking at I was I'm going to say only five years. It's ridiculous. He shouldn't spend a single second in jail, but it looked

like his rigged case was going to find him behind bars for five years. The government decided they want to retry the case. So now after having spent $5 million, he has to go out and raise more money to fight something again that he's already fought in court that should have never existed to begin with. So if you think that this isn't real, um it's absolutely real and we have more and more of these cases. Uh Roman Sterlingoff, Kone Rodriguez, William Hill, Ray Yousef, the list goes on and on. Open source developers oftentimes they don't make a lot of money contrary to what a lot of people believe that they're open source coders. They may make some money. In some cases

their projects are for profofit in some cases they aren't. Nobody can afford to go up against the government because in any of these federal cases you are looking at millions of dollars. I had Joe Roaches on to talk about his situation with Dragon Chain and how when you're going through this legal situation, you have to basically go through discovery where you have to provide all of this incriminating evidence against yourself and it's really expensive and timeconuming to put all of the information together specifically when you're talking about complex technological ideas and then the government loses the discovery and then he at his own expense has to go and

cobble together the discovery. Again, these are the kinds of tactics that they use. So, this kind of liability uh is going to crush only the innovators. This is another again protects the large players. And so, so now that Trump's little technology board, who does he have? He always sits there and has these meetings with big business and big cronies. And he always announces these deals and all this investment, which by the way, usually never materializes. He's been talking about trillions of dollars investment coming into into the US. Look up whether any of it happened. He did it during his first term. He did it during this term as well. He'll do, oh, Saudi Arabia, they're investing two,

you know, they were originally going to come and only invest 700 billion, but I talked him into a trillion dollars. Good. Look back, look in two years and see if any of it happened. It's usually Just like he claimed that, you know, there's a ceasefire on the table. No, you drafted terms of a ceasefire. There's nobody on the other side negotiating. There's no counterparty. So this is all a consolidation of power and a consolidation at the hands of big tech who by the way big tech in this country by the middle of this year will have lost to Chinese open-source models. So this is just ridiculous. Um so yeah open source contributors and startups face existential legal risk.

You know, this is why I'm glad things like Darkfy, I haven't looked into it this much, but you know, there are things like Darkfy, Amir Taki, uh, has been working on this. I don't know what the current state of it is, but he's been working on creating completely anonymous tools that allow developers to develop uh, in a truly anonymous way where their identity isn't revealed. This is the kind of stuff that we need. This is what it has come to. If you want to be able to innovate, you have to go through 10 levels of hell just to protect your identity. And the people that are creating these systems, I found, are usually the people that are most actually passionate about human

liberty and uh and the protection of privacy. It's it's absurd what's going on here. Um and again, it strips the state. It's a federal preeemption of state AI laws. So, both the White House framework and the Blackburn bill push federal preeemption of state AI laws. Um California, Colorado, New York, Florida have invested in their own AI regulatory frameworks. I mean, I'm sure they're all crappy, but you know, the the answer to that is to not live in those states. Uh, move to New Hampshire or go somewhere else. But under the system, the federal government overrides them all, and all of that power is put into the hands of Howard Lutin. I'm going to look into it.

This will be a fun research project for me is to look into what these laws are and then cross reference this with whatever investments Can Fitzgerald has in AI and to try to figure out how to game how how he might profit from his regulatory role. So the paradox is the federal framework is equally demanding as the state laws claims it it claims to replace. So there's FTC rulemaking authority, multiple overlapping liability theories. So the states don't get less regulation. They end up getting the same regulation, but it's from Washington DC with zero local input. So it's not like this is a scenario where it's like, oh hey, you know, we don't want the states to come

in and really make it ownorous to stop innovation. um they're going to put they're actually putting more regulatory controls in place that will disadvantage any startups, open source developers or true innovators. The true innovation is not going to come from meta or open AI. The real innovation, all you're going to get from those companies are just, you know, redigestible versions of their existing models. the real breakthroughs will come from entrepreneurs and from people that are outside of the system. That's always the way that it works. This is why people were so afraid of deepseek. You know, in the US, people have been operating under this model of, well, we

just need to add more compute power. We need more data centers. And China's like, well, hey, maybe we should just make this work differently so that uses 90% less energy and uses a completely different approach. And as a result, they're about to catch up. Well, you're no one's going to have an incentive to try or experiment with those kinds of models based on the liability that's been put in place. And the big companies are just going to do whatever they can to do as little work as possible to protect their existing franchise. So, I want you to know that this is going on with AI. And now my again, when I say this stuff, it's like, do I think you're not going to call your

congressman? You're not going to stop any of this, right? I mean, this is even more complicated than some of the other stuff. It's not like you're going to stop these bills. The answer to this is always stop using these centralized systems. Start using self-custody AI. Get AI in, you know, onto your own computer, onto your own phone. Learn how to use it and get that before these centralized systems get put into place. This is why it's important to have crypto in your own self-custody. And I would argue the criticality of having privacy coins because once they clamp down on this stuff, if everything that you have is a transparent blockchain and you could only get it by

going through centralized facilities that have even more tracking and more layers of accreditation for everybody involved, then you're never going to have freedom through crypto unless you have crypto that's outside of the system that can't be tracked. It's going to be the same with AI. That's the answer to this. But but understand this these kinds of actions these kinds of activities are what a nation does when it's collapsing. The whole basis of America was built on the idea of freedom and it was on the idea of entrepreneurship and free enterprise. This is the opposite of that. This is what what you do when you're trying to grasp for control in a in a declining situation.

So now we have the cyber strategy. Now, Trump announced a seven-page cyberspace uh cyber strategy which he released on on March the 6th and you know shorter may be better or not depending on the specificity and in this instance it's probably not beneficial. Uh Trump's strategy has six pillars and two of them are absolutely terrifying. Pillar one is shape adversary behavior through the full suite of offensive and defensive cyber operations. And pillar two is promote common sense regulation. I mean I you know I've said this several times there's no s anytime you hear

bipartisan or common sense regulation that you better bend over. So on the same day he signed an executive order combating cyber crime with 60-day reviews, 120day action plans. It sounds bureaucratic and boring, which is usually the point until you look into what is actually in it. So the more frightening aspects of this, you know, there's a thing here that says where we're going to unleash the private sector with incentives to disrupt adversary networks. So that's not cyber security. It's like it's privatizing cyber warfare. So they're giving corporations the green light to run offensive operations. Well, who are these corporations? They're

defense contractors. They're intelligence adjacent firms. The same companies that built the surveillance state after 911, Palunteer. There are no specifics on oversight, no rules of engagement, no accountability framework. It's blackwater for the internet. And that's exactly what it is. private companies with offensive cyber warfare or excuse me with cyber weapons and a government blessing. So pillar one deploy the full suite of offensive and defensive cyber operations private sector given incentives to disrupt adversary networks. This is always you know it's always frightening when this happens because you know governments may have rules that they have to follow but

if you do these things outside of the system which is often why they use government contractors you avoid any of the transparency. So you can imagine where this could go wrong with respect to what they consider to be cyber warfare and how that bleeds into even more surveillance. So here's how it it's different even than Biden's version. And I'm never going to celebrate Biden's version of this, but but you know somehow um somehow Trump's stuff manages to be worse every time. It's almost I at some point I thought maybe it was just you know just a fluke but after a while when it when it happens every time it's clearly not. So there are mandatory

cyber security standards for critical infrastructure those are gone. So your hospital your water system your power grid there will be no required security standards. Software liability shift gone. Companies that ship broken insecure code face zero accountability. SEC cyber incident disclosure gone. If companies get hacked, they don't have to tell you. Uh, cloud provider know your customer requirements are gone. Anonymous cloud action for anyone. Well, that's actually a a good thing, I would argue, but that's it's weird that we would have that. There's a lot of weird stuff going on. It's like with Linux now, you know, you're going to have to provide KYC to use open-source software.

There's just a lot of weird things going on that that that don't make a lot of sense. But um but in essence they're eliminating cyber security standards u liability shift to software providers removing the SEC disclosure requirements and the know your customer requirements for cloud providers are gone. Although, you know, even as I think about that, I don't even know if that's relevant because um will cloud will cloud providers even have to do know your customer if based on the payment mechanisms they use the the KYC is kind of built in. So, I don't even know if that's so much getting rid of a KYC requirement or just removing something that's unnecessary because

it's already baked in. Um, so here's where this goes. The strategy calls for deploying a Gentic AI for autonomous threat detection on government and critical infrastructure networks. So this means well Skynet in a way this could this is where we get Skynet. So agentic AI means AI that acts on its own makes decisions and takes action without human approval. So this agentic AI is going is going to be utilized for threat detection on government and critical infrastructure. What could go wrong? Um and then who is responsible if something does go wrong? So they're

putting autonomous systems on networks that control power, water, and the financial system. All AI powered. So, this is the same government that can't secure its own email service and that, you know, launched the Obamacare website. They're now deploying autonomous AI on critical infrastructure. Um, so there's the cyber pipeline here, which is eliminate every mandatory security standard, unleash private corporations. And again, you know, part of the issue with this is if this were like a a private market thing, it's one thing, but this is about actual government infrastructure itself. So there there there are no standards for government systems and infrastructure.

So, you're unleashing you're eliminating the standards, then you're unleashing private corporations with no oversight, and then you're deploying autonomous AI on critical infrastructure. I I'm not particularly um compelled to think that they're going to do a very good job of that, particularly considering that the only kind of AI that can exist are the centralized AI that escape the other regulation that they just put in place. So I mean this is again this is just handing over autonomous AI to Palunteer X uh uh Oracle and Meta this is effectively what all this is doing if you put all these different

pieces together. So so let's look at all these different pieces together the four different elements of this energy. The IEA builds the lockdown playbook. The government controls when you drive, when you fly, when you cook. Voting. DHS builds a federal voter identity datab database. The federal government controls who votes. AI, federal pres uh preeemption of states. The DOE, Department of Energy, is the gatekeeper for all new AI models. The FTC defines what is and what is not true. And the government controls what AI says and who builds it. And the cyber policy is now ma mandatory standards eliminated. Corporations weaponized and

autonomous AI deployed. The government controls the entire digital battlefield with zero accountability. So this is your technocratic control grid energy voting AI and cyber systems all in one architecture. And all of this was pushed in the last two weeks while absolutely no one was paying attention because of everything else that is going on. Again, reminder, we're in the middle of the government shutdown. So I, you know, I've been saying for a long time, the Clarity Act is actually the worst of all of this. And yet, despite everything that's going on in the world, they have set a priority to push getting the Clarity Act done. Why is the Clarity Act that important? They know what economic

collapse is coming. They're creating it, right? And so what this is the opportunity to push in place technology. This is how we get carbon credits. This is how we own nothing through all of this this land grab this complete centralized control of the entire infrastructure and the entire apparatus. And I, you know, I know I went through a lot of material so far and this was just an overview. We'll I'll go deep into these individual pieces uh in subsequent podcasts, but I mean, you know, we're in the late stages and I'm going to get my hands on the entire Gaza reconstruction PowerPoint presentation, but I think maybe that is going to be the easiest way for people to understand because I

think a lot of people when I've been talking about this for the last three or four years have said, "Wow, that's way off in the distance or you couldn't get your your mind around how it would be how it would actually be implemented. We now know how it's going to be implemented. We now know who is going to implement it. We now know the legal framework under which it's going to be built. We know which technologies are going to be used. We know which companies are going to control it. Um and we know what their business model is for it. So this is a completely different situation that we are in. We now have specifics. We've gone from the complete abstract to now very concrete.

But yet everybody is asleep. There are people that think we defeated the globalist. How can you look at the Board of Peace and the Gaza Tecratic Plan and everything that we talked about tonight in the Genius Act and claim that the globalists lost? It's just different people that are controlling it. So, um, so this is serious stuff. This is serious stuff that affects AI. This is serious stuff that affects everything. And um again the answer it's you know I so I guess what's really a kick in the balls with all of this is you know we went through co and then you know if you're listening to this you were probably either against it at the time

against the lockdowns or you you you're now against them and realize it was problematic. And yet somehow we reelected the guy who started it all, who kicked it all off and managed to buy some story about how this is the guy to save Western civilization. He gets back in place and he's using the exact same playbook. So I call this operation warp speed 2.0 because it is exactly the same playbook. And so so many people are like, "Well, we'll never fall for it again." Not only are you falling for it again, you voted for the same guy to do it to you again. So, it's it's remarkable. And I'm not saying

this to like to black pill and say I you know, you can't vote your way out of this. I've been very consistent about this the whole time. The only way out of this is to not not only not comply, but to build parallel systems. So, no, we're not going to fix voter integrity and all of a sudden things are going to become magically better. The people that everybody thought was going to save American civilization, Western civilization just won all three branches of the federal government and they added more technocracy in one and a quarter years than was added in the previous 10. So, what do you think the voting situation is going to do? How's that going to change

anything with a DHS centralized voter database? I'm urging you to not believe in whatever the white knight they're going to the next the next bag of you're going to get is it's going to be RFK. It's going to be Tulsi. None of those people are going to fix anything. None of those people have fixed anything. We have not made any net improvements. Temocracy has flourished in every single category, including healthcare on the whole. I mean, this is why you have people like Robert Malone resigning and everything else. You have Trump now coming out and they're basically they're saying they're going to shove RFK. I told everybody on this show from the very beginning, whatever

they don't get done in the first 100 days, it's dead. And I was very skeptical that they'd get anything done in the first 100 days. And what happened? Everybody immediately got into power and said, "Oh, we've got to assess the situation. We've got to move slowly. Clearly, these are not serious people that don't they don't understand how this works." And and here's how it works. It doesn't work. We're at the late stage of collapse. And so, it's cop to think that federal voter ID through DHS is going to save America. It's cop to think that any of these politicians, if you're not realizing how badly you got burned by Trump, well, you think it's going to be Tulsi. Look, I'm going

to say I told everybody that Tulsi was a SCOP from the very beginning. She was in the military scop division of the army. She was a WEF partner. the fact that she dyes uh her hair a streak of hair gray. She goes, look at her media interviews. All of it is scripted because she comes from the SCOP division. So, she has t-shirts made about no war in Iran. She talks about no wireless uh warrantless wiretapping and then gets into power and then what happens? We get all of it and she doesn't resign. And then here's what's going to happen next. The next thing she's going to do is she's going to say, "Well, I stuck around because if I didn't stick around, it was going to be worse."

You've been played again. Nobody is going to save you. And all of those people that said, "This is it. This is our last chance. We have to vote for these guys." Turn those people off. Unless they've come forward and they've said, "I was 100% wrong." And and they admit to the fact that they were completely fooled. Unless they say that and then more importantly explain how they were fooled and demonstrate that they've learned something. It's okay to make a mistake. We all make mistakes. But a lot of the people that pushed this were warned that these were mistakes. And I don't think that they've identified the root of what the mistakes were.

And they're going to try to get people to FOMO in on another group of white knights. And we're way out of time here. I hope you are realizing the magnitude. It's hard. You know, sometimes I go over the same stuff in different ways because I'm trying to figure out a way to take the complexity of all of the information and put it into a coherent framework where people can look at this and say, "Okay, we're screwed, right?" Like there's no walking this back. This is all a power grab for the federal government. And the reason for it isn't to save America. The reason for it is to save particular financial interests. And if you want to understand why everything's going on, follow the money,

follow the board of peace, follow the Trump family investments, which are not just the World Liberty Financial is involved. Did you know that that Pakistan, I believe, has bought $5 billion worth of USD1, the Trump family stable coin. Now they want to use it for the Gaza Reconstruction Project. I mean this then you have Lutnik backing Tether. I mean you are again I am going to write the book the creature from Epstein's Island. Uh and part of it I'm going to write it over the summer because part of it is as I do these podcasts and everything else. There's just tons of research that goes into this. But every time I do this, every time I do one of these podcasts,

the one thing that that I take away because I I try to look for historical precedent for this. There are a lot of people that will defend Trump just saying, "Well, this is the way that it is. It's, you know, this is the u, you know, the spoil system or whatever." It's like, this is insane that people are doing the mental gymnastics to try to rationalize any of this. And no, even by historical standards, this is an unprecedented level of corruption. Dick Cheney making a million dollars a year from Hallebertton pales in comparison to the Board of Peace and what is a $122 billion reconstruction project just in Gaza. And Gaza is only one component of

it. You might have noticed recently now I'm seeing some news where like Trump's getting basically tired of Iran and now he he made some comment last week that well we could come in and basically take over Cuba. Well, what does it mean take over Cuba? Because if you're sitting there saying, "Oh, yeah, USA, we're number one." Um, America is not going to be the corporation that is owning the reconstruction of Cuba. There's not going to be an America resort built in Cuba that the American citizens are making money off of as a taxpayer, as taxpayers. They're going to use taxpayer money and military invention to take intervention to take over the country. And then the Trump family and the

Lutnicks and the Wickoffs and others. They're the ones who are going to personally profit off of this. There's no American interest in any of what is going on. So, you know, it's but it's so vast. I didn't even know even in doing a book like, you know, I can nerd out on this stuff. Even some of these articles that I write, it's like I realize when I write them, you know, it's 7,000 words. Who is going to read this thing about the history of tokenization and the three different, you know, US CBDC pilots and everything else? And it's just and I, you know, I realized that. So it's like how can you take what's going on and make it like the creature from Jackal Island meets Big Short but

the Big Short except based on well those were also based on real situations but to take the horror of the situation that we have but put it into a narrative form that people will understand to appreciate exactly how badly taken advantage of we are by this system and this technocratic system and what the and what the end state of this is for us. And so anyway, I appreciate you putting up with the uh the rants on this, but I I get frustrated every time I put one of these podcasts together because it's just like it's another rabbit hole. But there's never been a situation where you you come to the end, it's like, "Oh, wow. Yeah, this is

really good. This is going to improve human freedom. Uh this is going to improve privacy. this is going to help uh the average person uh have more control or agency over their life. Not a single time has anything even remotely in that category emerged from analyzing any of this. So again, it's the same playbook. 2020 public private partnerships bypass FDA safeguards emergency justification speed over scrutiny product vaccine for 330 million people. 2026 public private partnerships bypass state law emergency justification speed over scrutiny product control grid for 330 million people. So yeah, the vaccine wasn't the end point. It was a test run. And they

learned that if you move fast enough and nobody reads the documents, nobody asks questions. And anyone who does is a conspiracy theorist. What they did was they co-opted or have tried to co-opt the people that were questioning it last time and they've tried to put them into government to silence them while they roll out the same thing. So you have a lot of people that had really great intentions that exposed co that got involved in government and now that they're there, they're in a situation where they're kind of they're now in this place where they still believe that the best way to fix it is within the system which is their flaw. that's the flawed part of their argument that was

never available to them. But now maybe they understand that but they're stuck because they're in the government and now they don't want to speak out about the government because they believe that the only way they can affect change is through government. So now some of our best people have been silenced because they still believe that they can fix it from the inside. It's like that that joke I'm going to go in and fix the mafia from the inside. It was never possible. But now it's going to take a lot of courage from people who believed they were doing the right thing by getting involved in government to get out and admit it was wrong. This is the time for that level of courage. And we

don't have a lot of time for that. But I'm glad to see that Robert Malone jumped off. And I hope to see I hope to see others. And the bigger the names, the better. And I think that truthfully this war in Iran is is just that's the final straw. If you were holding on to some grasp of 5D chess that's over. So now we need people to be courageous not only in saying this isn't this administration isn't going to be able to how we are going to be able to fix it but to realize and to recognize that the problem was belief that you can fix this system at this point. We need those people working on building

parallel systems. We need those people creating not fighting a rigged game. I've been saying that for a long time and I will tell you some people are listening to that. There are a lot of people I can't I can't even say who all of them are but but there's a reason that we've been getting traction in the last say 60 to 90 days and that this is going to be building. Um yeah I mean somebody says Robert Malone is a total s I know I've heard that those stories too. I get I get some of the arguments on on on that front, but at the same time, he did he did step down from what's going on and uh he saw the writing on the wall. But but again, other people do. Like at this point, why

is RFK sticking around? Why is Tulsa Gabbard sticking around? Because she never had the intent that people thought she had. She was always a scout. My point is for those of you who really believe that these people were going to save Western civilization, I hope you get it now that that was not ever going to happen. Regardless of the intentions of these people and I will say that the intentions of some of these people was never to do that in the first place. Um so and we're seeing a lot of you know VC is down like 10 points in Ohio. Um, he's a technocrat. You there you could Ohio is a big center for this. I

saw Whitney Webb I think just put out an article about that. But maybe Whitney's been listening to us and maybe Whitney's been listening to Craig Winglewitz who's been talking about Ohio as ground zero for this stuff for months and months and months if not years. Like he's on the inside of this. He's been talking about all of it. He's been talking about Les Wexner. He's been talking about the Mega Group. He's been talking about Androl, all of these things that are going on inside of Ohio and JD Vance and everything else. Ohio is is is a ground zero example of within the country. If you have Gaza, the rebuild of Gaza is an example of what's going on outside of

the country with our taxpayer money to the benefit of the same people. Ohio is a state where this is happening. And you know, if I had more time, I'd do more analysis of what other states are beginning to be infiltrated by the Peter Teal crowd. Um, that's a one of the songs that I played uh at the beginning. Um, Sign My Name and Light. I I have a video. I was trying to get it done. I I had a crappier version of it where the graphics weren't exactly right and everything, but I I have one that should be much better. But the but the whole idea behind that is I I think there's a big flaw on the libertarian side so there's this whole basis of you know

the importance of consent but but what is consent and when is consent informed because if we have a situation where like we have now people have been conditioned to sign these click wrap agreements which they couldn't possibly read because there isn't even enough time to read it. Well, technically it's consent, but is it conformed consent? And how does that even work? And a lot of these technocrats are pushing this, and I, you know, I'd argue it's a violation of of natural law, natural rights. There's there's something that's missing in some of these network states that um that I I actually think goes against consent. But I think that's an interesting an interesting point for

conversation for a number of days. So again, the vaccine was the test run, but this is operation warp speed 2.0 and the payload is the entire surveillance grid and it's here and there's no more like there there's no guessing on whether the technology can exist or whether the technology will exist. The CEO of Nvidia said this week that AGI is here. Uh, and as Mike Adams and I have been saying, I mean, if you still think that AI is vaporware, you're you're just flat out wrong. But it is continuing to accelerate. So AI plus surveillance plus digital currencies um, gives you the ability to implement these kinds of systems. And so now I

think there does need to be a bigger debate about what is consent and how does how does that work? And I think part of what and when I say libertarian it's not all libertarians it's just one faction within libertarianism. What's happened is it's been a re it's a reaction to woke and the reaction to woke is to say well rather than have something based on DEI or something based on affirmative action everything should be based on merit but then that's been extrapolated to um giving people power over your rights on the basis of merit. And that is where one arc of this libertarian sli uh

sliver has gone with the likes of Peter Teal. And I think it violates and it infringes on consent and it it infringes on free will. So more on that in the future, but I you know if you can read these things yourself or run them through AI and and ask some some different questions but get the actual text itself. Um, but they are building the control system at warp speed. And the answer isn't to beg them to stop. We have to build systems that they can't control. That again is always the answer. There's another song that I that I uh produced, another music video and um, you know, let me actually see which one this is that it actually it hits on

um, it's it's called we are the mapmakers. And it hits on something that, you know, I'm conflicted on all the time, which is like with this episode, spending a lot of time exposing what's going on, which is necessary. It's important to do, but in the absence of actually building the parallel systems, it's useless because people can learn about this all they want, but unless we build an alternative, you might end up in a situation where people become demorali, even more demoralized. They look at this and it's like, well, there's nothing I can do about it, so I guess I'm just going to give in. I don't know for how long, for more than a decade. You know, it's been kind of a popular phrase of

people to say, oh, we're waiting for our AI overlords to come in and take over. I mean, this I' I've known people that have been saying that for like well over a decade. It's almost like people have been conditioned to just accept that there's nothing that they can do about it. There is something that we can do about it. Unfortunately, uh, we're running out of time. So, for me, it's always a balancing. And I I I want to do more, well, what I'll just figure out how to balance it, but I need to do more on the, uh, the building the alternative systems. I've got to update Freedom Forge and I need to figure out a way to scale people, uh, and onboard people more quickly. And I

realized that the the inperson workshops don't scale. Uh although if I do run for Senate here, at least I can go around the state and reach a bunch of people. That will be an efficient way to do that. But I want to do online workshops as well and then uh automated tools where people can on a self-service basis. But we just we have to get people a really simple all right here's how you get started do this take this first step. Um and uh you know that's the point. Somebody in the comments says going off- grid here so I'm not that worried for myself. I mean, you know, I don't know, going off-rid, if we don't stop technocracy, none of that matters. There's no hiding from this. It's a

global surveillance system. So, you could go off-rid, but that doesn't mean that they're not going to be able to track you and put you under their system there. Their their system is a, you know, leave no one behind kind of system. It is not compatible with other systems. That's why it's imperative to understand technocracy as a political ideology. uh and and it's not something that coexists with other ideologies. So, it needs to be stopped. It's it's not it's not something that you can coexist with, unfortunately, by the way that it's designed and the way that it's been implemented. And and again, I don't think they're going to win per se. I think that there's a likelihood that they're going

to wipe out humanity in the process. As an example, look at what's going on right now in the Middle East. I mean, the rhetoric now on nuclear war, and I don't even know how much of this is true, right? So, now you can't get any information out of Israel. You can't get any information out of any of these countries. I mean, frankly, there's been a blackout on Ukraine and Russia. As much as we have all of this technology, I I feel like in many ways these recent wars and conflicts have been the most heavily censored of all, which is pretty impressive if you consider um when you consider that people have access to to the web and everything else. So, I don't even know what to

believe, but it certainly looks like uh if what I read today was true, and some of it comes from the times of Israel, Israel is getting hammered. Uh Tel Aviv is getting hammered. I'm reading that there's low morale. People are are starting to defect. If that's actually true, the I think the biggest risk is probably going to be um uh Israel dropping a nuke at some point that and and then and then what happens? You've we've now seen Russia has made the threat that they'll you know, if Israel uses a nuke, Russia's going to use a nuke on them. We're kind of getting to a kind of a ridiculous phase on this where it's not clear. I I you know, Trump's position on this is has

been completely incoherent. What our goals are are are not well formulated and they've certainly changed, but it certainly looks like we're losing. Um and it certainly looks like or it was an intended controlled demolition. Um you said, "Do you have a list of points against the Clarity Act?" I don't on this one, but I I've certainly talked about it on on others. The the points against the Clarity Act are it is the biggest surveillance legislation in in history. It is going to require and because it's not about crypto, it's about tokenizing everything that you own. So Larry Frink has come out and said even this week, everything is going to be tokenized. There's going

to be a programmable, trackable, sensorable digital token that represents your ETFs, your 401ks, your retirement, everything that you own. And those tokens are going to be subject to all of the know your customer laws, all of the surveillance that we have with the current financial system. And that information will be shared with multiple US federal government departments and foreign central banks. So it is the complete surveillance over everything that you own including the ability to reconstruct your transaction history. So not just that you did a particular transaction but what the combination of transactions are. Your entire flow of money has to be

able to be reconstructed. And then the people that operate the exchanges that track all of this. there's more certification and more bureaucracy and more employees that have to be certified to manage the compliance infrastructure. So in the end this is how we end up owning nothing because it will give the ability you you go from owning things to basically having IUs on something and those IUs are centrally controlled by third parties. So it is very simply is the most massive surveillance bill uh in in US history and it's being pitched as pro crypto and even then the crypto bros are so incompetent

that they couldn't even get the the uh yield on stable coins. Like it's just a massive loss. It's just it's a it's an incredible lesson in incompetence. But what's incompetent is the idea that a technology that was meant to be peer-to-peer without third parties would benefit by engaging in the legislative process with lobbyists. That was the first part of the problem. Uh was engaging to begin with, but then they engaged and were the least competent people I've ever seen. Uh and so in the end this benefits the banks, it in it it benefits Black Rockck, it it it benefits the technocratic companies that are involved in all the surveillance. We get

screwed, innovation gets screwed, and we lose the entire purpose of crypto and which is uh and and even tokenization, which is the ability for people to voluntarily engage in trade without layers of middlemen and layers of surveillance. That was the true promise of the tech. And we have the 180 degree exact opposite of that. And it's not just our money. And it's not just digital currency. It's what we own. So I have to state again, money only represents 5% of global assets. Think about it. How much of your net worth is in cash or in money that you have in a checking account or a savings account?

probably not very much. Probably maybe 5%. The rest is in your house. It's in your stock portfolio. It's in all of those other things. All of those other things are going to be digitized and are going to have the same surveillance as CBDC's. That's why the Clarity Act is a 20 times bigger problem than the Genius Act or CBDC's. And I know people don't understand it and it's been hard. This is why I encourage you to keep getting on the podcast and and it has been bigger and it's getting millions of views a week and the stuff is growing, but there's no one else talking about this because there's no money in talking out against this. The financial incentives are all aligned

towards pushing and promoting the system. all of the entrenched entities. We're talking about trillions and trillions of dollars, hundreds of trillions of dollars of global assets. You throw in, you know, derivatives and everything, you're talking about quadrillion plus dollars worth of assets. And the people that manage those assets want to protect their business. They own the media. They own the politicians. They own the lobbyists. There's no one negotiating the Genius Act or the Clarity Act that is representing human freedom or privacy. I've outlined this at day2026.com. You can go to the bills section and I've taken all of these pieces of legislation and I've listed

who the main lobbyists are. I name them. I show the revolving door which former regulators then turned around and started drafting the legislation. you. All of that information is on the website. And here's the punch line. No one is representing privacy or human freedom. And they pay, I'm not exaggerating, in some cases up to $2,000 an hour for these people to represent them in negotiating with Congress and drafting these bills. So tell me how a an open-source software developer like Roman Storm who came to this country with $500, how is he going to go up? Not even against I mean separating out his legal case. Let's say he wasn't in his

legal case. Let's say he was just back to not being an imprisoned and targeted open- source developer working on protecting our fourth amendment rights. Let's say he was he was still going about his business of doing software development and now people are working on these bills. Well, how's Roman going to come up with $2,000 an hour to have a seat at the table? Or how is Roman going to compete or even the crypto industry going to compete with the banking lobby that's already entrenched uh and that already controls the people that the crypto bros are paying $2,000 an hour to people that are already controlled by the banks. They don't even realize how stupid they are. They're

giving away their money to get rugged by the banking lobby and they're too stupid to understand how it even works. But at the end, there's no we have no voice. We have no representation. We can't afford to bankroll these politicians. And these politicians have no ethical integrity. They're like maybe a handful of good whatever. There's Thomas Massie, there's Rand Paul, and everybody else is basically. Okay. Two out of 530. We're nowhere close to being being able to in fact we're not not only are we not close we're not even gaining any momentum we also used to have Justin Amash we used to have three out of 530 now we have two out of 530 that is the end point of the Ron Paul

revolution from the political route I think the value of the Ron Paul revolution is people learning that the Fed exists and that we don't need it I think that's the real benefit of it but there's nobody this is why when I say on this it's like You know, I could come on here and say, "Call your congressman and here are all the phone numbers you could call." And it's a that's a waste of time. I know it's a waste of time. I've engaged in that process. It's just like when I say that the people that thought that, you know, Operation Warp Speed One guy was going to save Western civilization. Turns out you got Operation Warp Speed 2, except now some of the people that

fought Operation Warp Speed One are entrenched in the government, not speaking out against Operation Warp Speed 2. We need those people back. We need their voices back. We have to acknowledge where we are. Yeah. Somebody says, "I know well in DC. It's a revolving door for K Street lobbyists." We're talking about 220 people, former regulators with the CFTC and the SEC, 220 of them are working on the Clarity and Genius Acts. All of that's on the day 2026 bill tracker thing. So again, yeah, this is the thing that's I mean it's frustrating about this you these people that u like Ian Freeman and and

Roman all these crypto PS right so they get targeted by the government the government comes in with unlimited resources that they're stealing from the taxpayer the rigged system and their primary motivation is not the truth and I'm not exaggerating what I have Roman Sterling off's lawyers come on I think April the 14th. We may pre-record it. I don't know if it's not on the day of the the podcast or not, but but I I they'll they'll share their stories. One of the lawyers, this was his first case, and he's just said he was just completely disillusioned by how the system actually works even relative to what you're taught in law law school as a lawyer. So So what

happens is this, these people become prosecutors. They go and work for the DOJ. I go work for the IRS and it's a career path. And the whole point of the career path is, hey, if I worked for the AG's office, if I worked for the DOJ for X number of years, and I get a bunch of wins under my belt because that's what's important. Not the truth, not the law. It is what is your win rate? Do you make a name for yourself? And why do you want to make a name for yourself? Not because you're pursuing the truth or you're protecting people's rights or you're protecting the innocent or anything to try to claim that that's the case with the SEC. The career path for somebody in the DOJ

is to rack up wins and then leave the DOJ and become a defender and charge $2,000 an hour to protect the people that we have on our crypto urban to protect to try to save the people that are on our crypto P list and they're friends with the new people that come in. So it's part So, so here I've violated a bunch of people's rights and I've elevated myself and now the buddies that my buddies that I brought in to replace me. I can go into them and I can cut a deal on a buddy buddy crony basis and then I can rip off these crypto prisoners of war, these people that, you know, were just trying to promote freedom. I can now promise them the world at at their most desperate and try

to extract millions of dollars in legal fees. This is how this system works. This is the revolving door. list it with these bills, these former regulators. What a disgusting system. What a parasitical system. And the thing is, if you've never been involved in it, just like I mean, it is really true. There are people that go to law school and they believe in the law. They believe they they come out of it with pure intent. A lot of pe most people don't go into law school thinking, hey, if I play my cards right, I'm going to be able to violate people's constitutional rights while working for the government so that I can go and rip people off on the other side.

That's usually not how people start, but man is it a slippery fast slippery slope and that's what it becomes. And then people get really disillusioned uh that go through that system. We're going to talk to some of those people. I want to expose more because again this is systemic. This isn't one or two bad apples. It's not like like like you can go back and look at the history of the promise system and how the DOJ works and backdoors into just like it's on and on and on. It's kind of like the book Devil's Chessboard that talks about the formation of the CIA and how that's a corrupt institution from the beginning. The same is true for the DOJ, but but we've been

propagandized. We've been told, you know, all of this propaganda. I mean, I I mean, I argue that people are failing in civics, but I mean, I think maybe the people that fail in civics the most are the people that believed the civics is actually that the stuff that was taught when I was in school is actually real. I mean I guess not being propagandized because you know you can you can learn that stuff you know you can learn the three branches of government but truthfully the three branches of government are you know whatever big pharma the big you know militaryindustrial complex and the banks right it's not it isn't any of the things that we're that we're taught that it is um but

anyway it's it's just it's disgusting. So the point is we've people need to exit now. Like there is no more around. There's no more like I and I've tried I I tried to explain to people based on my experience how it works. And I a lot of people either didn't want to hear it or didn't believe me. But those people are now going through it. But we need more of those people to acknowledge that it's not a voter law is not going to fix this. RFK and Tulsi Gabard is not going to fix this. And all of those people that said that the last election was the last time, hold them to that. Not that whoever it is they're going to pitch next is the last time. I got to be honest with you. You know, I

used to I used to be a big fan of Patrick Burn, but he's been saying, you know, the next election is the is the last election since 2016. Um, and and then each next election is regardless of the outcome, it's always the most important next election. Now, the the last election was probably 2000. Right now, we're just we're uh we're just at that kind of late stage of collapse and uh uh and and complete denial of of of where we are. And if we sit and wait out of fear or hope that white knights are going to fix it, we're just going to get crushed. I mean, we are getting crushed. the rate of of at which all of this stuff is getting uh pushed through, the rate of

tokenization again, and if you're listening to this, who's been talking about tokenization longer than I have? There are not very many people that have that have been talking about this. There are certainly others that have been uh involved in talking about tokenization and and I started off talking about tokenization just as I talked about crypto as a potential uh I I saw in 2018 that tokenization could could be the solution to the Wall Street corruption crony problem just like Bitcoin early on looked like it could be a solution to the commercial bank central bank problem. And it turns out that while the technology had the promise to do that, still has the promise to do that, it has

been largely weaponized in the opposite way and it's been weaponized to uh as a surveillance system that's controlled by the very same people that we were trying to displace. And now it's happening really fast. that there are some people that were excited about the early potential for decentralization that are now just excited about having it at all. Not and they're rooting for the surveillance aspect and they don't know the difference or they do know the difference and they don't care because they're just trying to make some money off of it which they haven't thought through what all of that is actually going to mean for them. So, it's a um we're a precarious position.

Um, and I don't even know. I I have no idea. Like again, it's that balancing act, but if we don't get people exiting the system enough where we can get some traction, we can get some momentum, where we can then show other people that there is another choice. And I guess I'd say this, it's kind of like, you know, they pitched 15inute cities and they would have all these little sketch diagrams and everything else. and they've gone from abstract to now concrete um in Gaza and in other places where it's like all right here's an AI smart city here's this here's this here are the vendors you know we're at the stage where it's like okay we need to build these private marketplaces we have we

need to have people using private private cryptocurrencies private uh tokenized systems and we need to build a lot of other infrastructure and there's big there are big questions on on a lot of things I mean in fact most of the hard work is very much still ahead of us. I mean, there are a lot of people that believe in the Constitution and and I'm not saying that the Constitution was a bad thing. I'm saying that there's no way to get back to the Constitution from within the existing system. And so now what we have are, which is unfortunate, a lot of these network states are, I would argue what's problematic about them is that they don't necessarily have informed consent. It's kind of like a,

you know, you have people that are giving away their rights under false pretenses and it's somehow being pitched as being a pro-liberty thing. That's also problematic. We don't have a great solution for this. But, but whatever people liked about what the United States was uh and the Constitution and the fact that we have inaliable rights and all those other things, all of that's been violated. So now the question is when you rebuild something, how do you rebuild it? And right now there are a lot of psychopath technocrats that don't care about our inalienable rights. They don't actually believe in it. So we don't we don't really have a great experimentation. We don't have a a great um

test case here. Most of the new systems that are being built, I do not think value free will and natural law at all. I don't they don't seem to be baked into the DNA of these projects. So, a lot of stuff a lot of stuff to do. I put a link, a Streamyard link into the uh to the comments if you want to join the Q&A and I'm going to send around a a few other things. Um, so let me let me see here. We'll see if anybody pops in. years. Hopefully, at least for the next few

weeks, uh I'll be doing this at the same time. Somebody said the audio was weak. Um apologize for that. It It sound It sounds good through my microphone. I'm going to I'm going to turn it up a little bit and see if that helps. I never know the distance from the microphone. Sometimes it's too loud, >> but it sounds good through the headphones. Um, somebody said, "Get a life, dude." All right, great. So, that's your uh that's your contribution. Or what is that? What is that in comment to or is that in comment to guns are

obsolete due to terminator robots, mechanical police dogs, and kamicazi drones? Well, admittedly that is somewhat problematic. Um, I mean, even how to defend yourself. I mean, you know, we have a lot of I'm certainly uh you should be able to defend yourself as pro second amendment as you can get or as I like to say, print guns, not money. But, um, but yeah, I don't know. I this AI surveillance and these weapons and autonomous weapons and what's being rolled out is is going to be pretty hard to defend ourselves against.

Um, thanks for keeping the show on Rumble. Do you have alternative video platform or internet? I I mean I I'm a little bit behind. I've got to upload some of this stuff back to IPFS. So I have a lot of the episodes stored on IPFS internet planetary fin uh file system and so it's a decentralized storage solution. Um, but and then I'm on YouTube and I'm also on LinkedIn, which you know, whatever. Quasi on LinkedIn, and Spotify, iTunes, I think Amazon Music, something like that. Um, so I'm

on a bunch of different different channels. And of course on X. problem with X is we get a lot of traffic from X, but there's no way to comment on X or have the comments come into this centralized system. So, I I wish that could be fixed because we'd have a lot more interactivity if the people on X Rumble's uh trash app developed by the same pro techross. Yeah, I mean that's true. We've had Craig Wowitz on here as well. It's paytoplay. It's not actually a free speech platform. uh a lot of the traffic is over inflated um and fake and there's a whole bunch of problems with it. But you know at this point we've got to use what we can. At this point the the the

key is to just get the information out as quickly as possible. So there's always the oh build another system and it's just it's very hard to get network effects. Um, I mean there certainly are other other platforms, but there's there's almost a diminishing returns. It's like at this point if I can't automate publishing to a platform, uh, I won't won't go on it. Yeah, I need some crossf functional API. Yeah, if it has an API. I mean, I actually switched like for my podcast, I was using this one system, Red Circle, for um iTunes and everything else, but it was manual to upload and paste everything. And it was actually so timeconuming that I just ditched it and then wrote something, you

know, using AI to go to a different platform. So that when I'm done, I download the audio files and then I just run a script and then it automatically uh uploads the podcast and it gets published with show notes and everything and and literally it saves hours of time per week. So, if a new platform comes up and I can't automate going on to it, then I'm not I'm not going to do it. Particularly if it's a it's a small audience and then it takes more time even to get up there. Hey, deadheaded. How are you? >> Evening Aaron. How are you doing this evening? Can you hear me? Okay. >> Yeah, I can hear you. >> Oh, okay. Good. Good show again.

touching on a a lot of good points, uh, timely points. As I have to say, the energy thing has been coming up a lot lately. Um, especially with these energy lockouts, this new term energy lockouts. >> Yep. >> And u, so what's the answer for our alternative systems? We're going to do a, you know, we need what private who, you know, now that we have AI, how do we build these things? >> Well, I know I saw that today, uh, New Hampshire, our governor signed

some executive order allowing us to pursue nuclear, and I know there's some people working on like small nuclear reactors and a whole variety of of other things. Um, I think the problem that we have now is timing, right? Like, you know, getting this new stuff up and actually working and usable for commercial and retail applications. We need it like immediately. I I mean, these guys seem to be hellbent on destroying the existing system in a real hurry. Well, yeah, but like we got fusion energy coming online in 2028

for data centers and Trump just bought TAE. What do you think is going to power Gaza? And he just signed the small nuclear uh power whatever executive order to put in all the bases. Uh the uh of course the the Department of Energy is funding a ton of fusion research, but they're they're wasting our money on fusion that'll never be viable as a uh as an energy generation source. And while Trump buys the cheap stuff that works great, TAE energy or TAE, >> I mean, that's you know, I do need to do a deep dive. I I'll do a episode or two on on energy. I need to do a deep dive on that. I've been meaning to. And this

is going to be another area where it's going to be very frustrating to watch the Trump family. The fact that the Trump family is involved in this stuff is just outrageous. Oh yeah. I mean, good god. From billions in crypto, this is going to be hundreds of billions. This I mean there's just they got they have to control energy as you say. And it's really hard to do when everybody knows you got a technology that you can basically generate energy for micro, you know, for ten of a cent on the megawatt. >> Yep. >> So, you know, that's going to be a tough one that they're going to they're going to do. And now,

have you heard about the guy who's there's a guy he's on YouTube chemist uh he's open sourced his patents. He's got a patent for you can leech it out of salt water. He can get he can leech 60 elements out of salt water, gold, aridium, all the arsenic, all the heavy metals. He can take contaminated soil and leech it out of there in 20 minutes. Uh it's all reusable. It's all recyclable. It's a continuous system. You can as you can scale it up and it only takes 20 minutes to leech it out, about 20 minutes to then uh pull it out. Um it's using a um ion cathode and a positive and negative

in a in a chamber filled with this leeching material separated by an ion film. Well, those ion films are a couple hundred dollars a foot if you buy them out of China. He just opensourced a way to make them at home in a few days for $5 a square yard. So now we've got unlimited um rare earth metals and an easy way to clean them. Clean up the uh the soil that if you leech soil, it comes out cleaner than when you put it in because you get all the arsenic and negative stuff out of it. Yep. >> And uh he's doing what he's showing is

he's doing you could you could build this easily yourself. It's that simple of a of a of a uh setup. >> Well, I mean, we need to So, I've got the own nothing site and um the the idea behind that is you do these assessments to figure out what is your current sovereignty level. In other words, how attached are you to the existing system? And then the idea is that it recommends resources and ways that you can improve your sovereignty and exit the system. And and I need to build out something for energy because for what you discussed, I mean, we need to have really simple one, two, three steps for um how people can use these things and

um and all these things. It's just kind it's kind of like quick tutorials for Zeno wallet. Here's how you use Zbeck. Here's how you how you use this. Here's how you can't form a medical trust. Here's how you exit insurance. We need similar things for for energy and I this an area I just started to start I decided to start with money and healthcare but we need to get into energy and um you know maybe you and I can talk about that and uh >> and food >> and research that well and food as well and I have food on the list um it's just man >> have you thought about um adding con looking up the concier services for medical around the country and adding those to euroserasite.

>> I have and then we we've talked a lot about adding alternative uh options entirely that aren't even kind of here's just a lowerc cost way of of using our existing shitty system. Here are completely different types of approaches and interventions. And that's ultimately where I want to go with that because I mean you could use concier services and everything else but the stuff is still very much attached to the existing system and and a lot of the reporting and the information still gets hoovered up into the system. Um so we're kind of trying to balance it although at the same time medical tourism might not be a very viable option if we have energy lockdowns.

>> Yeah. Or you got to get a a digital ID to travel anywhere. >> Yeah. >> Except do everything but vote. >> Exactly. So somebody says here, well, yeah, but even on the voting thing, I mean, I talked about the Save Act. I mean, they want to consolidate this within DHS. >> Yeah. >> This is how this is where MAGA is going to end up supporting a digital version of Real ID. I mean, it's so transparent what's going to happen. What does any of that matter when every machine is so hackable out there and they they've been even every side, the Democrats, the Republicans have been saying that since 2008, you know, since Obama was saying mail ballots are the biggest thing you can do

to to cheat the system. >> But again, I again I mean I look at this, it's like, okay, well I mean okay, let's say they're rigged. We still have complete Republican majorities. What has it gotten us? Fixing the voting system doesn't fix the fact that the average voter knows nothing about the system and now we have mostly people that are now dependent on the system and don't have a stake in it. The voting who the whether the voting is on a blockchain or or certifiable or not doesn't change any of that and it won't fix anything. It's the next diversion. This is why I think maybe Patrick Burn is just a complete scout because, you know, do we really think we're gonna fix America by

having voter ID? If people are buying that then I mean what >> I mean we need it vote. You should have to put up your ID to vote. There's no doubt about that. But that should just be a basic ten tenant of voting at this point. >> You're right. It's not going to fix anything. No, but the pro the problem was, you know, you used to have to own property. You used to have to have a stake in the system. Once we got rid of that, everything else that we've done, to be honest, what do you think had a bigger impact on screwing up the voting system, removing the requirement that people own property or changing whether you have mail-in ballots or not? I mean, realistically, this is one of these

things where it's like we're not even remotely addressing yet again a root cause. It's kind of like right now people are like I I'm seeing this and I'm like okay there are people that are raising putting together fundraisers to pay TSA employees and Elon Musk is trying to make himself look like a hero by offering which I know was rejected but to pay TSA salaries. No, we should have never had the TSA. The TSA is a massive surveillance system and imposition on our rights. And where are we in 2026? were sympathizing with TSA agents. This is how in every event and in fact we've done this for so long. We are so far removed from even engaging in

debate or acknowledging the root of any problem that it doesn't matter. The voting thing is just an absolute uh distraction. But again, it's going to be a power grab for the DHS. And we already know what the DHS has done in a whole variety of ways to violate our rights. So, we're going to centralize power more with the federal government. We're going to make the states pay for it. And even if we do it, it's not going to change a single thing. It's not going to save America. It's not going to restore the integrity of the system. It's not the problem. >> So, the solution is to make the government inconsequential at the in the way that in the way they are now. Well,

the requirement is to build these parallel systems so that we can operate outside outside of the system and to do it quickly enough that they before they put the entire technocratic grid in place. But the thing is there are a lot of people that I talk to that that are they're they try to be optimistic about this. I'm like, look, if you're not actively exiting the system and building alternatives, there's no reason to be optimistic because a lot of their optimism is around, well, they're far away from building that. They are not far away from building that. They're not far away at all. this clarity act is, you know, again, I, you know, again, it just dawned on me today that

>> for so long everybody's been like 15 minute cities in in the future by 2030 and like here's a sketch diagram when in reality now it's like okay here are the developers, here are the construction companies, here's Oracle, here's Palanteer, here's the business plan, right? It's no longer theoretical. It's no longer abstract. All of the technology is in place. All of the people are in place. The financing structures in place. And guess what? None of this it none of these problems none of these things are being built by they're they're not sovereign. They're technocratic global corporations. I mean, they're replacing an open air prison in Gaza with a digital prison.

PE people should be absolutely irate about what's going on in Gaza. >> Oh wow. Um yeah, that's I can't even I've gotten to the point where I I can't pay attention at that to to a lot of this stuff now because it's it is I'm outraged outrage at what's going on in Gaza. I'm outraged what's going on in Iran. I I'm outraged about uh the the Save Act, the the uh Clarity Act, um the uh what's going on in in silver and in other medals. I I I this energy lockdown, these data center, useless freaking data centers, which I don't know if you heard, but AI just gave a big blow to the to the memory guys

yesterday. They announced the uh new logorithm will speed up AI memory usage by eight times. So, >> so that's going to get, you know, there's all this stuff going on and it's just, you know, I I I can't >> I can't I I hear I I have a hard time even keeping up in my niche area of what started out as digital currencies. I can't even keep track of all of the either CBDC's or backdoor CBDC's. The thing is it bleeds where I think it's important to talk about this is for those people that believe it's 5D chess and it's trust the plan. It turns out the plan is to use the American military and taxpayer money to destroy things and

kill people so that the Trump family and related families can monetize the technocratic reconstruction. Once you understand that, it takes the mystery out of the 5D checks. That that's why that to me the board of peace is is so critically important to understand. There's no America first in any of this. None. It's zero. It's that you know the the organization that's doing the Gaza reconstruction is not Americaowned. It's not a it's a corporation. And while we're funding the bombs and we're funding everything involved in destroying Gaza, we don't benefit in any way, shape, or form from the reconstruction. And we're killing innocent people and violating their rights.

>> You know how upset Hillary Clinton is about the border peace because this is basically the Clinton Foundation except Trump did it for billions when they were doing it for hundreds of millions. No, you know, you're exactly right. This is the thing. People, they didn't like it when Claus Schwab did it and everything else, but but this board of peace, I mean, Tony Blair is on the board of the board of peace. The president of the World Bank is on the board of the board of the board of peace. Jared Kushner, the people that everybody's like, the globalist won. I'm like, your business, your partners with Tony Blair. I mean, wow. It it is it's unbelievable how this this has happened.

Now, I will say there's a massive crack, right? There's there are uh I would say in New Hampshire with this Senate race, if I have to fully go through with it, um my bigger audience I have a bigger audience of disaffected Trump supporters than I do freestanders. >> Um it it it's but but more of them have to wake up to the QAnon stuff is still out there. There are people still believing and pushing uh QAnon narratives. It's >> 60,000 man army. You don't believe they're coming to save us, Aaron? >> I mean, it's crazy, but but there's a crack in it and uh a big crack. And and

you know, look, we've all been betrayed. Nobody got We've all been screwed at some point or another. It's just a question of, you know, some of us got screwed earlier than others. That's that's that's really the only difference, but it's hard to admit. It's embarrassing to admit that, you know, people believed in this stuff. And I'll tell you that that believing that the guy that did Operation Warp Speed was going to save American civil or Western civilization, like that that is a the propaganda and gaslighting required to pull that off was just breathtaking. A and next, you know, and now we have Operation Warp Speed 2. I do think that what's going on right now should be

called Operation War Speed Too. It's the same tactics. It's exactly the same tactics. >> Oh, yeah. I agree. Well, who should we have voted for? >> Well, Teresa says, "It's truly bewildering that I felt feel for it, fell for it. The alternative was Camala, so I went with it. We need people for the people." I mean, you know, I mean, my point on this was I would never vote for Camala or any of it. It's just that that this system is not the system is designed for our active participation in picking between two choices that aren't actually distinguishable fundamentally and giving up our free will and giving up our own agency to believe in the system. There isn't any way to fix the

system at this stage. And I and I say that because I researched it then I've talked to other people who study the rise and fall of civilizations. It's not like in nations. It's not like this is an uncommon thing. It's not like the United States is unique. There have been uh many political entities throughout history. And and in fact there's while there are some things that are unique about the United States. What's going on right now in terms of corruption, in terms of the debasement of the currency, in terms of the expansion of the war state towards the end and using force as a way to try to, you know,

save from economic collapse because you don't have enough internally generated economic activity. All of that is normal and all of it ends in collapse. what what what you don't have is a historical example of there being a turnaround and we're not doing anything different or better. So at some point you have to realize okay we have to we have to start something new we have to exit. There are big questions though you know I started to try to talk about this you know America 2.0 know from first principles thing and I got way sidetracked on like 10 other things. But there's a genuine problem right now which is you know I used to be interested I I'm interested in the

concept of network states but I'm horrified by what has been the implementation of network states thus far because they've they've tended towards technocracy and and I see what the appeal is in the way that it's pitched and as I mentioned earlier it's a reaction to woke book. It's a reaction to DEI. But I think that something that is purely reactionary as opposed to grounded in first principles is probably a bad idea. I think that having a system where you just have polarized opposites that bounce off of each other and flip back and forth is is probably not going to to end well. It's not grounded in

inalienable rights or in in anything in my opinion that respects free will. It's maybe not all network states, but certainly the the ones that I've seen are like that. So, it's kind of so we don't in my opinion, there's not a we don't have a really good exit and build project going on that I think defends free will as a primary value. So why why do all the network states I'm sorry release their coins on ETH and Salana? That's the only their fiat their their their monetary is always released on one of those two things it seems. And I'm sorry to interrupt.

Well, I was just going to say I'm not not all I so I think that um Liberland might might do something with with Zeno or a stable coin possibly built on Zeno. Um but I I maybe they don't know about it. I mean there are a lot of people that that let's look at what's happened with this whole history of crypto. I remember when Vitalic when the when ETH launched was laughing at you know Bitcoin having 5-cent transaction fees that that was really expensive at the time and obviously Ethereum didn't solve that and then Ethereum went and tried to build second layer solutions and now Ethere now Vitalic has come back and said yeah this whole second layer solution thing was a bad

idea now a lot of us knew it was a bad idea to begin with a lot of this stuff was conceptually flawed and it was grounded in technology and engineering with in a vacuum without respect to economic theory and that is what Bitcoin wasn't like that built Bitcoin was designed with with you know understanding uh economic theory in mind but it was hijacked by people that didn't understand that I don't know if the Ethereum people ever understood it but these things all gathered cult followings and it's really hard to separate people from their blockchain once they become attached to it. As we've seen with the number of people that are absolutely outraged about me

discussing the link between Epstein and Bitcoin, these people immediately reacted against it without looking at any of the evidence, which shows you that it doesn't even matter what how bad it could be. They're never going they're always going to try to find a way to defend their project. And that's that's just happened with crypto. So, I want to talk about Palanteer for a second. So, they created the Maven smart system and um Hi. Hi, Aaron. It's Dan, by the way. How you doing? >> Good. How are you? >> Good. Um so, the um the Maven smart system has taken over the military targeting apparatus and it um it directly tells the uh from satellites to

the drones and whatever war plananes where to bomb. So, in the first 24 hours of the war, it identified a girl's high school as a target and then it doubletapped it with two US tomahawk missiles. The first one hit the school. Um, all the children ran into the prayer hall and then the second one incinerated them to the point where the parents didn't even recognize their bodies anymore. Now, the reason why this happened is because the maps that they were using were four years old. Now, um seems really reckless that Palunteer is like having this AI smart system running these uh million-dollar missile systems when, you know, a simple Google check or just going on Zillow, you could have

figured out that this is not a military target. So, um I just wanted to point out how like reckless the spending is with the military and they can care less you know um you know what in fact the Iran the Iranians are painting pictures of war plananes and everything else like that and that United States is dropping a million dollar missiles on pictures of fake planes. Um so so warfare is getting pretty um strategic at this point. >> You know it's it's interesting about that. I you know we the US has clearly the largest military budget in the world and and no one's even close. But we also

spend the most on health care and we have the 38th ranked outcomes. And I really do think that we're at the point where just because we spend more money doesn't mean we're the best. And and it does seem like we are absolutely getting outplayed. I mean, just watching what happened, I I don't think anybody expected that Iran was going to be able to, you know, shoot all of these other places, destroy all these other targets throughout the Middle East, and then eventually break through uh Israel's defense shield kind of three weeks in, right? No, nobody thought that was going to happen. I I'm not even sure if they planned it out. I don't know if this guy was like Trump seems to have

this 80s mindset where it's like, you know, it's like Rocky 4. Um, you know, I think we're just going to go in and dominate this. And they don't realize that the rest of the world is is is advanced and you know, when you're going on someone else's terrain and their terrain, they're building stuff 500 meters underground under granite and your bunker busters can only go down 160 me. You know, you know what I mean? Like we haven't we didn't really think this through. So, it's it's and it shows at this point. Um, I don't even know how we're going to wrigle out of this this one to be honest. But the Palunteer thing, do we really believe that they used four-year-old maps or do or do we

think that they didn't care? Because I find it hard to believe that Palunteer technology would be using outofdate information. >> No, no, you're right. Wait, wait. I got to speak up there. This is not a mistake. I guarantee you if you look at the list of little girls that were killed in there, those were family members of people we wanted to hurt and punish. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Just like Anar Alaraki when Obama killed that 16-year-old sitting in a cafe because his father had betrayed us. He was American citizen. >> Yeah. I don't think this is by mistake. I don't uh I'm listening to a lot of shows where they're saying Trump miscalculated and he thought he was just

going to have a quick bombing and a quick regime change like Venezuela. I don't believe that a lot of this is a mistake either. I think this whole thing is designed to collapse the US dollar and uh move on to something else. And um you know like you some people might call it the controlled demolition of America. Um, you know, the alternative is that he just made a giant mistake and an emotional decision to attack a country when he wasn't really prepared for it in any which way. >> Have you guys heard that the rumor that we used rods from God in Iran? >> No. >> Yeah. It's kind of really strange. Um

the there's a woman a scientist and she created this super alloy maloy or something like that and it's it it doesn't oxidize even at 5600 degrees. So it's good for rocket engines. It's also good to put on tips of tungsten rods entering the atmosphere at you know 20,000 miles an hour. Um, then there was the uh love triangle murder at one of the um I forget which uh military base it was and it was a husband and wife were working in a lab and he wound up killing their 26-year-old lab assistant and his wife and then himself in a lover spat and they were all three working together in

the same lab which was working on on military advanced military weaponry. Um, the colonel that recently went missing two weeks ago or something like that. Three or or whatever. Have you been able to find him or or there there's two of them that one went missing, one's been murdered. Can't remember which. He was actually overseeing that project where those four people were are now dead. And then a a a fifth sixth person who is was that Harvard professor who someone went out to his house and shot him two weeks ago. He was monitoring incoming uh astral like near-earth

objects around the earth and the moon and apparently picked up us testing those on the moon. So it's weird. And I went and I looked I saw this theory and then I went and I looked and I checked all the stories about all these deaths and they've all happened since June of 2025 or July of 2025, one of the two. And they all worked together in that department at the same military base. >> Wow. Wow. What a what a coincidence. Yeah. I mean, >> how did you hit a precision bunker buster t double tap right on the same spot in a two, you know, 200 meter deep bunker and take it out? A couple of rods from God would do it.

>> Yep. >> So, who knows? Everything they tell us is a lie. I don't know what's going on. >> Yeah. I Well, I don't know what's going on either. I mean, it's tough. I have a few Telegram groups that I'm in. I mean, most of it's propaganda on either side. I will say I'm disappointed that uh you would think with all the AI and the history that the CIA has with propaganda, Iran has better propaganda. Some of the stuff that they've been putting out um about Trump, it's actually better than better than the stuff that we put out. Um, so it's, you know, we're not even number one at at propaganda anymore, which is, you know, that that's how how badly we've slipped in in all in all regards. But

>> I just say I heard some other countries are putting out unredacted Epstein stuff. I haven't looked into it, >> but that seems right up your aluminum. >> Yeah. Well, so well I saw anonymous said that they were going to do that as well. I mean, I don't know what what exactly they would have access to. Somebody said, "Have you seen the Legos they did?" Yeah, that's the one that I'm talking about. There's this Legos uh Iranian propaganda >> that is uh that just hilarious. Um but um but you know it doesn't look good and it looks like we're now sending troops and or at least you know and we're trying to do it peace through strength. But you know the whole idea of peace through

strength is that you had the strength and didn't have to exercise it. That that's the whole point of peace through strength. What what what we're doing is we're using force and we don't have and we don't have the force that we think that we have. And so now it's kind of embarrassing. The whole point of peace through strength was to have such an advantage that no one would ever mess with you. Well, okay, in this case we were the agitator, right? This wasn't defensive in nature and then it turns out we didn't plan it through and now we look like we're getting our asses kicked. That's not peace through strength. That's the use of force and bullying when you actually

may not have the goods to back it up. >> That's smoking mirrors to fool everybody and come about with some other agenda like you say to crash the dollar to drive oil up to, you know, all these different things. Well, and I heard it on Alex Jones, so I don't so I take it with a grain of salt, but I he did claim that Lutnik was the one who profited from uh the insider trading on oil and front ran Trump's fake announcement that that that there was a ceasefire. >> Yeah. Well, maybe we're done, maybe we're not. Maybe I'm sending another 3,000 Marines over there. Maybe we're sending in another, you know, uh car carrier

brigade or whatever, you know, car. >> So, as far as the straight of Hermuz goes, um according to Iran, it's it's open, but only for countries that use the yuan. Um if you're using United States dollar, you can't you're not allowed to pass. And uh apparently it's 35% of the uh world's energy traffic trying to go through. >> Yep. Um yeah, I noticed that as well. And then Marco Rubio came out with a brilliant statement who said uh Marco Rubio says the straight of Hormuz could reopen tomorrow if Iran allowed it. That's a brill that's that's a brilliant statement. >> Yeah. It's more like the central banks

and Lloyds of London. >> Yeah. I mean, um, I don't know what's going to happen, but it but it but it feels there's there's an aspect to it. Again, when you see the board of peace, you know what the agenda is? The agenda is to use taxpayer money and to expend and and American lives to destroy things so that private multinational corporations owned by the politicians sending these people to their death can make money off of it and build a technocratic control system. That's that's not a conspiracy theory. That is the business plan and the charter of the board of peace and the reconstruction project in Gaza. This is actually what's happening. But I think mixed into that is hubus and

ignorant about our relative strength of our military and our and our relative strength in um technology. I I think that there are two there are two things. It's both a technocratic gend backed by hubris and some incompetence and that's a really bad combination. >> Well, is it hubris? I mean, he says already mentioned, oh, you know, we've got and Trump, we've got weapons of time and space. We've got advanced weaponry that we're not talking about or we're not using there. I mean, this is, you know, ridiculous. Um, we know we, you know, when he when when Trump says we can manipulate time and space, he's not lying.

It's pretty interesting that we uh the United States has been at war with Iraq for the past 35 years and now Iraq has just joined the war on Iran's side. And um in fact, they got these drones that cost $10,000 that can somehow make it past all the million dollar billion dollar defense systems and fly around the United States bases until it targets Apache helicopter and then blow them up. >> Um it's amazing. the these cheap drones. Um they could just like basically the in the old warfare you can I think the United States is planning on attacking an island tomorrow. I I don't remember the name of it but um they're going to put 5,000 Marines there.

>> Yeah. Yeah. The the uh Iranian island right at the straight of Hormuz and and they're threatening to do that. I mean again I think these are all threats and then Iran is threatened that they're going to blow up. I right now. Last time I saw there was a big warning basically encouraging everybody to leave the UAE. >> You know, Dan, you mentioned for 35 years we've been at war with Iraq. Well, the seven years before that, we were building Iraq's army up to the fourth largest on the planet while they were fighting Iran for us. >> Yep. >> At a proxy war. Well, again, the currencyy's bu built on debt and most of the debt, at least until recent times, most of the debt has

gone to military. Now, it goes more towards entitlement programs and and healthcare, but historically, it's been more towards military. So, um military spending is the basis of the currency itself. And the politicians and people connected to the politicians are the ones that make money arming both sides. And to them, it's just a business model. And this has been consistently the case from the beginning. I mean, the whole CIA has just been a business development enterprise for select individuals and corporations and lawyers. >> Exactly. >> Who pick who picked both sides. Sometimes they're partnered with Nazis, sometimes they're partnered with communists. It's not even ideological,

nor is it about American interests or the protection of our rights. it. But importantly, it never has been. That's that's the thing that um we don't realize how much we've been propagandized in school to believe things about these agencies that were never true. >> Oh, 100%. We I mean, even, you know, us Gen Xers were not taught real history in any stretch of the imagination. >> Yeah. Teresa's got some comments. Uh she's you can join here live if you want. Um that last link I dropped you in the

private chat on the Streamyard. >> Yeah, >> that's a uh unbelievable paper research paper that just dropped by Sunny White, one of the one of the big wigs in the infusion research and it is a monumental. You may want to add that one to your AI learning. >> Yeah, I've got to uh I've got to get I've got to get up up up to date. I've been traveling so much. I've got I'll be back for a month. I got to do a complete overhaul of uh of the technocracy atlas. And again, it's tough balancing how much time do you spend educating and learning about like in other words, I've seen enough. There's I don't need any more

information to tell me that the system that we have is completely corrupt and that there are actual psychopaths and there are people that I mean there are people that will rape children. There are people that have that are operating on a completely different morality. I don't need any more data on that and I don't need more data to know that we we the way out of it is not by voting. It's by building parallel systems. But the problem is other people need to understand what's going on. And I think that we are still stuck with I still think that the sticking point I think we're in a in a tragic situation that a lot of the people that opposed COVID have been captured by this

administration in the second term. So rather than being the voices speaking out about what's going on, they think that they could still fix it from within and they never could and they certainly can't now. So, at what point do they leave and help build the parallel system? Or do they stay um or do they then believe that, you know, come up with some other new white knight next time around or believe that if we only fix the voting system that that things will get better? >> It's interesting you brought up the word rights before. uh during the Snowden case um he exposed the whole FISA court system FISA. So there's um rubber stamped deep state operatives that appoint these judges

that are secret judges with secret courts and they can arrest American citizens with no no warrant um in a secret court, put them in jail. And uh this is going on um with um on a massive scale right now. So this you know Snowden blew the whistle on this around 2013 but um now with Palunteer involved in this it makes you wonder um how more advanced this is going to get get um with the amount of intrusion into everybody's lives. Well, I mean, it's omniresent as I as I talked about tonight. I mean, you're you're looking at AI legislation.

Everything is being further centralized. So, the voting database will be consolidated by DHS. We know that Palunteer is connecting federal government databases. That information, I believe, will be fed into Real ID. We have operation warp speed and palunteer working on consolidating information from different hospital systems and moving health information and consolidating that with um government database information. So all of the information is being consolidated and a lot of it uses the click wrap agreements and uses consent and some of the clauses from these agreements to mix this data in a way where it's supposedly de anonymized but actually isn't. and there

are loopholes in these quick wrap agreements. So all of that's going on right now and you know certainly they routinely violate our rights on this. So are you there? I can't hear anything now. Is there I guess you guys are muted. >> Oh yeah, I was just muted when I was listening to you. Um, well, we've got, you're right, parallel systems, but it's I saw a nice there was a uh I think it was on mines. I was looking around and something in one of the Linux forms and a guy did a nice write up of the uh apps you need currently to be sovereign. and it was Lennux and it was Signal and it was, you know, a few other ones and how to self host uh mail and and things like

and uh websites. There's just no way a regular person is going to put this together. I mean, I could spend probably myself would probably take me to do all of that. I could probably do it in three or four days if I sat down and read. But even that's a pain in the ass. >> Yeah, it is a pain in the ass. And this is part of the the oh nothing site and actually part of why I'm doing this deooled phone which I actually have. I just need to launch it which is to give people a phone that has a bunch of stuff pre-installed. But there's a you know I I'm I'm saying this as I'm using um Streamyard and we're on X and everything else. There's

>> I've gotten to the point where most of the information that I have I'm trying to get out there. So, it's not like I'm hiding it from anyone. And so, I have to use these platforms otherwise there's no way to get the information out. But there are parallel systems to me people have to start using alternative money. the the it is it remains the number one leverage point that we have because their ability to build out these control systems requires our complicity and use of fiat currency and if we stop using it they lose their control. That's why it singularly remains the most important thing that we can do. we have to do all of the other things, but by not using

the dollar and not participating in the system, it removes their power and their resources to be able to build the digital prison. So that's why I focused on that one first. We have to do everything. We have to do all of these things, but we need to slow them down. And right now, I don't see any speed bumps. And the reason that I decided to talk about the AI policy and the cyber policy and even the SAVE act is because they all relate to the further consolidation of federal government power a in a way that limits free speech, limits innovation, and adds more data uh and consolidation for the federal

government. And it's happening right now. So, we've got Theres. There we go. >> Hey, how are you? >> I'm doing well, guys. Thanks for doing this. This was really informational and what I've been trying to get my arms around to just disseminated out to the grassroots here in New Hampshire. But it's it's just I'm bewildered. I mean, I look back and I for those that don't know, I stood up during CO as a clinician and I identified it very quickly. But, you know, to be fooled, I knew warp speed was a concern. I there's things that were yellow flags, but I got all behi I raised my hand 100% um when you said, you know, I have to identify that I made a mistake because I absolutely got

behind Trump. Um because the the contrast was Camala, you know, and so I feel like now in hindsight, they just absolutely shepherd us in with like a psychop MK Ultra, whatever you want to call it. like told us everything we wanted to hear about saving this republic and making America great. And you know, now I'm looking at I'm like, we just got completely deceived. Like they interviewed for a job, we hired them for that job and two days onto the job, they completely do a 360 on us. >> Yeah, they did. And you know, I I guess I was in 2020. I was always shocked. I mean, I never I've never voted for a

Democrat, so I've never voted for Biden or Harris, but I also didn't vote for Trump. But I but I was kind of, and I've said this, you know, even at Free State Project events, the least amount of freedom I have ever had in my entire life was in 2020 in New Hampshire with complete Republican majorities with Republicans in control in Washington DC. And that remains true. And so that's always been a headscratcher for me about I mean you know again people you know my kids you know having to going to school they were the only ones in their class that didn't get vaccinated but the whole thing with masks and and and everything else it's like wow that that actually happened and that happened

uh under Republicans. and I'm in Nashville now, so that so some of that isn't necessarily all state related, but nevertheless, all of this stuff happened and it happened under Republicans. And so the fact that we thought that that the guy that did that was going to be the guy to to to to solve things and so much of it was well, it wasn't Trump's fault, he got duped and everything else. And I I researched Trump's background even before 2016. If you actually read his background and family background and his ties to people like Ray Con and everything else, there's nothing principled. There's no principled ideology about Trump. He's never that's never been a thing. In fact, he was largely a

Democrat up until the point that he decided to run. But but nevertheless, like it's I you know, I wonder but it's hard to convince people just because it's almost once you get fooled again, then you really now you now you're going to double down. Like if it was a mistake in 2020, you let it slide, then if you fell for it again, what's easier to to admit that you fell for it or to continue to make up make up excuses? I think for most people it's make up excuses. >> Well, like my dad said, fool me once, you know, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me. And I think the other thing, you know, a lot of this for me was once Charlie was um assassinated. I really, as a hospice nurse, like right

away things seemed very off for me. And then I heard Charlie say, "We're doing a genocide in Gaza." And I'm like, "Wait a minute, that's not the narrative of the right. Why is he saying that?" And then when he said a standown order for October 7th, all of a sudden then everything unraveled for me, including my evangelical Christian upbringing of bless Israel and you'll be blessed and always having to like defend Israel. Like all of that has changed for me since September. And that's a lot. It's a lot to, you know, digest and to sit here and be like, okay, I was an activist during COVID. I assembled people who felt that

was wrong who want to fight for our liberty and this republic for our children. And now all of a sudden you realize the uni party and the evil ones, the evildoers and the cabal are really this country that you took such pride in are manufacturing, you know, the demise of a country to to then go in and take it over like real estate transactions at the expense of the American people. >> Yep. >> It's a lot. >> It It is a lot. and and I didn't even realize I didn't pay that much attention to the board of peace at first and then I did a deep dive on it and I'm like wow this

actually explains everything. It actually shows who's making the money. It even shows the stable coin, you know, the Trump family stable coin. They're going to try to use this in Gaza. And it is it's I think the hard part is is that most reasonable people can't imagine that can't imagine sending people to their death for a real estate transaction. But I think on top of I think the Epstein thing is is important because it actually shows and we haven't fully understood the breadth of what's in it. But you know what they always say follow the money but you usually can't follow the money because the money is hidden in these offshore accounts. And now we actually have the ability to

actually follow the money and see what the behavior is. And you know how do you reconcile um sexually abusing children like that? Like that's something that's hard to understand or to accept that people do that and that and that those people actually have power and control systems. That's a paradigm shifting thing that I don't think anybody ever really want you never really want to accept that. >> Well, it's like the YDC cases we have here in New Hampshire, you know, um they people do get molested. That's a fact. And those molesters do walk amongst us and no one is all good or all evil and what they present to their friends and

family clearly isn't what they do behind closed doors, right? And so it is hard to embrace when you're a good person that someone could have ethics like that. But I think you know at the global top they really are managing this this to them they've justified it as a business model. you know, we have a farm. If we have an old hen who's no longer laying eggs, you know, we don't do this here on our farm because we have plenty of land, but if you're really doing it, you know, to be a a a business, you would call, you know, once they get older and they're not producing any longer. And that's what I felt like happened during CO. You had the baby boomers all hitting the nursing homes

at, you know, 10 $15,000 a month. They're no longer bringing in tax revenue. let's just, you know, clear the dead weight. And that sounds horrible. But at the same time, when you look at a country that's in debt the way that we are, from a business model, I believe that's how they justify it. That's how they rationalize it, right? And the reality is, you know, the dollar, we're way in front of our skis on this one. Like, how can we even recover? No one's wanting to buy our bonds. No one's wanting to buy our debt. The petro dollar, everyone else, the rest of the world is like, "Screw you. We're going to work around you." Um, I I don't know how America really will

survive all this. >> So, I mean, I think historically it the expectation would be that America collapses and it could be replaced by something else. I think that when I wrote my book, the one thing that that I've kind of discovered about this is that this seems to be a common cycle. What's happening to our currency has happened to every other currency in human history. There are seven reasons that fiat currencies typically collapse. And uh you know, usually you don't check all seven boxes and the US actually checks all seven boxes. uh I mean in terms of inflation, corruption, military spending, it's it's kind of a whole long list and and so so usually it just

collapses. Even the U global reserve currencies, if you look at the four previous global reserve currencies to the dollar, those also collapsed. And and so so to me, the problem that is that what what seems to happen is we're not we're repeating the same mistakes over and over again and expecting a different result instead of isolating and addressing the root cause of the problem. Having stateisssued debt-based money doesn't work. It's never worked in human history and we are no exception. So if we actually want to stop this cycle of boom and bust and the boom and bust and collapse of nation states, you need to fix at some level the monetary system. Um but then there that doesn't

solve everything. It is not true that if you fix the money you fix the world. There are certainly other other problems uh involved but but instead we go well is it going to go from the US to bricks? Well, why would we do that? then the bricks is going to collapse again. Why don't we actually try solving the uh the fundamental problem with the issuance of currency because politicians can't help themselves? And if you're making a currency that's based on debt and politicians are the ones that are empowered to issue that debt and create more currency, then guess what's going to end up happening? And it and it happens like clockwork. And we aren't any different. And in fact, I mean, I

would argue, you know, you know, we are we are at peak levels of corruption. I mean, I've said this. I what I've been in shock about recently is it's the fact that last week on my podcast I talked about war profitering which is been a common practice whether it's selling defective uh pistols or gunpowder that doesn't work or Brooks Brothers which sold uh uh uniforms that disintegrated at massive markups to Dick Cheney and Hallebertton to LBJ's uh big backers and finance earers profiting off of of Vietnam. This has always been a thing, war profiteering, except that it was always something that

they tried to conceal. It was never overt. It was always kind of like, well, we know this is going on. We're at a point right now where we no longer have the pretense of of having moral authority in what we do. For instance, when we invaded uh uh Venezuela, initially we started off by saying it was narco terrorism, and then by the time we did it, it was, "Well, no, this is our oil. We're just taking our oil back." So, we use that as the cover, but that wasn't even what it was. If you actually study the history of Venezuela and drug trafficking, you'll find that the CIA was actually uh right in the center of all of that activity. So, it wasn't a moral argument even

about drug trafficking. But now that we're doing these other things, you have a situation where the Trump sons are are owners in a drone company called P USA. They they took a golf course company or something and merged it with a drone company, took it public uh just at a time when we passed something in the budget that says we're going to allocate a certain amount of money to buying only domestically made drones. And I, you know, so I provided a list of all these different things and the board of peace is something that's not concealed. They had a press conference at Davos. So we're at a point where not only do we have the war profitering, we don't even

have the people that are doing it don't have shame about it. And it used to be that it was a president's backers that were profiting from it, not actually even the politician themselves directly. But then I found in researching this that the vice president doesn't even uh have like a conflict of interest. It's perfectly legal what Dick Cheney did. Dick Cheney taking a million dollars a year from Hallebertton was legal. Um, and JD Vance, who is an investor in Androl and a whole bunch of defense companies, robotics companies, and everything else. That's perfectly legal. Um, and and so it's just happening now in plain sight. And some people are glorifying it, which which, you know,

that's not a good sign. No, I mean just Monday I knew right away Trump was lying, you know, and nobody even talks about that. I talked with Iran. Iran turns around and says, "No, nobody talked to us." You know, like the story changes every 5 minutes. We're there to liberate, you know, the protesters that are being slaughtered in Iran. You know, now they're all, you know, it just none of it. You have to have such dissonance. And I feel like we're, you know, the individual like the girlfriend who married the guy who's cheating on her and she doesn't want to know that he's cheating on her and you're like, "Hey, sweetheart, he's cheating on you." You know, I just

there's like a level of denial going on. And even in the Christian church, it's just guys, like, why would you bless an entity that does not identify with Jesus being the Messiah? That's not what the Bible teaches us. You can love on them, but you're not going to go pay your tax dollars to them or go fight their wars for them or go send your sons and daughters to do battle for them when they're walking with evil. Like, what is this? What is that? What? How did we buy into that as Christians? Like there's so much right now that I do think um because of social media, people are able to actually start to verbalize

this or become aware of it. Like at age 52, here I am, you know, discovering that I was born and raised on false information. I look at my Bible, I'm like, that's not what the Bible says. Um, I just think there's so much going on right now that I I do hope that Christian or that we all like, why not just get rid of the voting machines? If we thought we had election integrity issues and we thought they were manipulating the results through the machines, how does the Save Act prevent that still from happening? >> It It doesn't. I I don't And I don't even think the Save Act is intended to do it. I think it's more centralization

of government power. It's giving more power than DHS. This is this is the problem with it. It doesn't it doesn't solve the problem, but it gives the federal government more power. And that is the actual intention behind it, which is something that we should all be skeptical of. And even if you believed that Trump had good intentions and the current head of DHS is the right guy, that power will persist for the next administration. And that won't end well. Right. Yeah, I know. I heard I I heard you talking on it. It's just people are buying the slop like that's going to fix things and I'm like, are you even like using any critical thought here at all? This is not what we voted for.

>> Yep. I I agree. I So I don't I see that there is a crack. I mean I I mean I'm very grateful that you because you are incredibly outspoken and and kind of a force of nature here in in New Hampshire and I it I I can only imagine how much flak you're getting. I mean I know you you're getting like you know like like you're you're actually getting they're trying to hack the uh your Facebook group, right? And so, um, this is the challenge of >> I run I I managed to assemble the largest MAGA Trump group on, you know, in New Hampshire. And here all of a sudden I'm saying, guys, I can't support this man. And so, yeah, like all of my

followers are just, not all of them. I mean, there's a good 20 30% that are seeing the light like I am, but I'm like, everyone's like, you know, we're going to leave the I'm like, leave. Go. You know, this is about truth. This is about calling it for what it is. And, you know, I'm I'm not here to assemble a big following. I'm here to do what's right and what's principled. And if you don't see it yet, go away. And when you do see it, you're welcome to come back. But my biggest concern is we've got to find a way. I've always felt like it cannot be this country can't be fixed by one person. And what I never understood about Trump is why he didn't like command everyone to get involved with

civic duty at the local level, right? I mean, this this country is so fundamentally broken with the uni party. Both both all the just all of it is just such a mess. We do not have people representing the people. So why not tell everyone, go run for school board, go run for zoning board, go run for, you know, selectmen, get more involved. He never did that. And that was a big yellow flag for me. And now even more so. But how do we find our trusted community? How do we find them quickly? How do we know who the nurse is, the mechanic? Can we come up with our own currency? like uh or we just throw our hands up in the air and just live daytoday and you know not worry about if

I didn't have children I probably wouldn't stay in the fight but I can't look at my 10 and my 11year-old and give up on this. I just can't. >> I mean, I feel the same way. I have 15-year-old twins and now I mean, looking at like the the prospect of a draft, um I I mean, it's it's beyond absurd. So, I mean, the approach that I've been taking is the local strategy. I so I've been taking the approach of to of to try trying to trying to build marketplaces that aren't necessarily dependent on locality because one of the problems is I mean you know I moved here as part of the free state project but the free state project and having done

gotten involved with things at a variety of different levels including local um it's hard to get critical scale so for instance you can use decentralized currencies this is why I like privacy coins where the currency itself doesn't have to a just a local currency. You can actually have a decentralized currency that people can use all over the world. And in fact, it's probably easier to build a currency that can scale um beyond the local local network. But then it's building marketplaces like healthcare marketplaces and food marketplaces. It's really difficult to get critical mass. Like even if you take the free state project, it's you couldn't operate marketplaces even within the free state

project within the state. The local thing gets tricky. I mean it's almost it's it it's almost more concentration. You almost need uh even at a local level more people to concentrate because as you know I mean I in my experience even in Bedford and other places locally it's really hard to sustain wins even at a local level. So you almost have to have, you know, even more hyper concentration if you're going to gain any sustained political advantage because I know a lot of the people that I know that are activists that are like maybe prohealth freedom or whatever. A lot of these people live in like blue states or blue cities where it doesn't matter how much

effort you put into, you know, you're in a city of 500,000 people and it's a blue state, you're not going to sustainably take over the school board or the um the town council. You need to move, you know, you need to move states. And then once you're in the state, you need to move even within the state further, right? Because even in New Hampshire, it's like you're not going to fix Nashville. You're not going to fix Manchester, right? That's not not in the short enough period of time. There are places in New Hampshire, there are smaller towns where you actually have the the possibility to to make uh improvements, but a lot of this requires that people move. Um, and that's a big

that's a big barrier. But I think you can build again, you can use alternative currencies and build marketplaces. Like I think about Joel Salatin or whatever. I mean, I, you know, I get some food from him from Polyface Farms in Virginia. Um, and so I think putting together resources of local marketplaces, but that where you can buy from other locations, not just your own, might be a way to build enough scale to get the ball rolling because that's the key. You need enough scale and economic activity in these alternative systems that they become viable, that people can walk away from the existing system. What if though, and I don't know, you know, if you're faith-based at all, Erin, but

like I just look at 6G and I look at the mark of the beast and you won't be able to buy or sell anything. And part of me is like, are they going to get to a point with the real ID and everything else that, you know, the only way I can get my paycheck is for it to go into, you know, this digital currency that the government, you know, gets to monitor that I only buy one stake or whatever. and I have to have this QR code in my, you know, hand or on my forehead in order to purchase or pay for anything, which I'm not going to want to do. And hopefully, you know, other Christians that are tracking to Revelations would say, "Oh, hell no. I'm not doing that." I mean, do we build something now and

then when that tipping point comes, people and people recognize it? we have something quickly like the framework all ready to go to be able to try and push back or do we just I guess if you believe in revelations it's all going to play its way out the way it's going to play out anyway but I don't know I just feel like maybe there's still some sort of redeeming um hope here for this republic you know that maybe this is just a time where we have to reflect on our pride and how much destruction we've done around the world how many lives we've killed for real estate transactions, you know, take down buildings like 9/11, you know, because we want an insurance claim or

whatever the heck was going on with that. I just I would hope that we would find some sort of mercy for our children and be able to I don't know if we had the framework built, would it be in vain to do that in the waiting? >> Well, I've been doing that. So, I have not I I've stopped using a personal bank account 2019 and I've been using privacy coins, privacy cryptocurrencies um and as well as gold and silver. I'm holding up a gold back now. >> Uh I don't use Bitcoin because Bitcoin is trackable. That's a separate conversation. Bitcoin was hijacked. Epstein was involved. I've done a bunch of podcasts on this. Actually, the critical piece of this is um is is

privacy. you because if the government can track the cryptocurrency you're using, then it's not very useful. And the government's already confiscated, the US government has confiscated 325,000 Bitcoin because they're mapping everybody's transactions. And so then they come to you and they say, "Hey, you either turn over your crypto or you're going to spend the rest of your life in prison." And so so far um mostly people have complied with that and therefore not this is why the governments around the world increasingly have these stockpiles. So you can use privacy coins. I've been doing that and many of the people listening to this podcast have also started using uh

cryptocurrencies like Zeno and Freedom Dollar. So I've been starting to do this and trying to build momentum around it. The truth is some of these tools have been hard to use. Uh and so but there's been a lot of improvements in the last 12 months to make them easier to use so that it's as easy as the as the current financial system. So that's going on. Um, you know, I built this thing called OSR. It's a medical tourism marketplace. You know, I think if if people can get out of one of the hooks that they have is not only the money, I mean, you mentioned mark of the beast and wrote an article about this. Most of our money is already trackable. I mean, most people

are getting paid through a through direct deposit. All of that information is tracked. That information is shared uh with the government. If you read the contract that you have with your bank, but you don't own the money in your bank, they can cancel your account without cause. Uh they can change the terms and conditions. They can share and sell your information. Uh they work with the IRS and other agencies. Any transaction over $10,000 is automatically sent to the Treasury Department and then at at their will just by signing a an order, signing a um just by signing a memo. The Treasury Department can adjust that, which they did recently and 30 zip codes in California and Texas, they

lowered the threshold from $10,000 to $200. So now any one of those 30 zip codes that does any transaction over $200, that reporting automatically goes to the Treasury Department, that's our existing system. Food stamps are use debit cards and so you know people that are using food stamps, all of that is digital programmable money. Um you can only use it to buy certain things. All of it is tracked. Uh HSAs, health savings accounts, those are also, I would argue, a digital programmable form of money. You can only use a certain amount of your pre-tax dollars. So based on what the IRS government, what the IRS and healthcare industry says you can spend your money on is all you can spend

a certain amount of your own money on. And all of those transactions are tracked. So we already have when I started investigating CBDC's, I started looking at how our money technically already works and it already has most of the surveillance that people are worried about it having. And now it's just going to the next level. So what I what I've been saying what I've been saying even since when I ran for president in 2024 was the best solution isn't to vote for somebody. It's to exit the dollar. That ditch the dollar. I you know I had a shirt. It actually said bank run now, but I I said changed the tagline to ditch the dollar. Stop World War II and the Fed and halt CBDC's.

Uh because that is something that that somebody can do. You don't have to vote for somebody. When you when you fight something, you give that that thing energy. Leaving that thing and putting your energy towards something else is better than trying to fight a rigged system. So, if more people just stop using the dollar, we wouldn't be funding bombing school children in Iran. We wouldn't be funding all of these things that we find morally ex, you know, reprehensible. Our participation in the use of the dollar is what allows that to continue to happen. And so I mean I I said if two to three% of the people just exited the banks and exited the dollar that would bring their system to a halt

because the entire system is not only built on debt but it's built on leverage. So it actually takes very little. We have the capacity to stop them in an afternoon. But it's but getting people to understand this is is a a hard cell because no one is ever taught how money works. And then when you actually have never thought about it and you learn how it works, this is another thing that you know, no one wants to believe. It's just kind of like no one wanted to believe that, you know, people wanted to believe the best about Trump and that no one wants to believe that, you know, here we go again. We're getting Operation Warp Speed 2. Well, wait until people learn about their the

the money system. I mean, Henry Ford once said, if people learned how money worked, there would be riding in the streets tomorrow. And he's right. If if people actually did understand that, u that's that's what would happen. But, you know, here we are. I've been trying to warn people about this for three and a half years. There are a lot of people that have been learning this, but it's also your investments. People don't own their 401ks. People have these retirement funds that they're depending on and they don't even realize they only have an IOU on those investments. They've already given away their voting rights to Black Rockck and Vanguard. And the next time

there's a financial collapse, uh if your broker goes under, you're going to lose your investments. Those investments are going to go to the secured creditor of your of your broker. But, you know, all of this requires explaining how the existing system works and then what they're trying to build on top of it, both legally and technically. But I think if we can get that information out um you know people will come to the conclusion that yeah we've got to exit the system. We can't expect the people that have built a fundamentally fraudulent system are going to take all of a sudden moral action. Uh they're going to double down and do what they've always done and use lobbyists and

everything else to control and manipulate the system. This is why I talk about these bills all the time. I analyze these bills. We don't have anybody at the table representing us. There's there's $200 million that's been spent on the Clarity Act and the Genius Act, all by banks and large crypto firms. There's nobody sitting there at the table representing representing us. So, I see Teresa's going in and out. So, I don't know if uh if she's having Oh, there there we go. So anyway, that's my that was my little rant on on that. But I think we could use alternative currencies now. We should use alternative currencies now and try to educate people. Uh but I'm I'm a I'm a

big believer at this point that we've got to put our effort and attention towards building positive things. And you know, you and I have talked so much about the polit I've never seen anybody actually get elected and then not become a worse person or sell out on principle over time. that that's been a common thing disappointingly I might add. >> Yeah. I mean there's a remnant in Washington. I mean that are standing firm. But >> I the other big thing is the whole Q crowd. I sent you and you were like people really believe this crap and I actually had someone the other day like oh yeah AI is going to do everything for us so we'll just have a robot and everything will be like 50 cents and

we'll be able to live like kings. And I mean, they're just going down a path of a golden age. And I'm like, "Wow, that whole cohort is going to be I mean, they're really down a path that they're I don't know, Aaron. >> Uh, so I've explored this this part as well. This is another one of those areas and I get very upset about this because it's related to um the Q thing and it is Jsara Nisara Jsara Nsara and Debt Jubilee. So it I and I actually think it's the same

people uh that promoted this idea back in 2001. It was the idea that what they claim is that well the real reason 911 happened is because Congress was about to pass a bill that was going to forgive everybody's debt and completely change the monetary system and and this is completely false. Some guy had a proposal on that but certainly Congress wasn't going to vote on that. And so then you'll find all these YouTube channels where and the the followers are honestly mostly oldered women and there are people that believed that this was going to happen. this this debt reset and so they stopped paying their mortgages and they stopped paying their bills and so then all of a sudden their

houses were foreclosed on but it became like this trust the plan thing where well the debt jubile is going to happen next week and there's this one woman that was actually promoting this debt jubilee that was wrong a thousand times literally kept on moving the goalposts on the date but these people still have followers and so so I you know people um are that distressed that They want they continue to believe this. But then this is even tied into another story about med beds and that you know you're going to be able to just sit in this medical bed and it's going to use frequencies that's going to heal you. And so then there are people that were denying medical treatment for this. And this was

I believe this is all tied into the same QAnon stuff. And so it it pains me to go to Rumble and look up Nsar and Jasara and see that five, seven, nine years later, people are still in the comments saying, you know, any day now this is going to happen. Um I it's, you know, whoever it was Mark Twain who said it's it's easier to fool someone than convince them they've been fooled. And that seems to that seems to happen. But um I don't know. It's it's tough. It's tough to break through this and the Q thing. I mean, you know, I go back to this and I just say, look, they tried to convince people that there were white hats in the military that were going to implement martial law, round up all of

the pedophiles, and then have military tribunals and execute them on closed caption TV. And when you take a step back and look at that, the idea that people were excited about the idea of suspending our rights and people were getting riled up and excited about martial law. That's really frightening. >> It's terrifying. Just like you said with the TSA, like why do we need surveillance? It's like when have we read a headline that the TSA stopped a uni bomber in the last 10 years? We haven't. You know, it just Yeah, it's really um it's been a lot for me to step back because I feel like I have discernment and to realize that I was

fooled. But I will say since Charlie Kirk passed, I do believe there's a lot of people who are I think we're in a truth crisis. Quite honestly, I think a lot of people are like, "What the heck?" Um, what can I believe? What can I trust? And so, like, even if someone does come along that has integrity that's for the people and wants to be a public servant for the people, it's going to be hard for everyone to trust that that's that there's any truth to that. Like, we really have to watch actions. like who's willing to sacrifice their job or you know put themselves out on the line but see we saw that with Trump right they

had him arrested and you know all of that so we thought okay by actions he's giving up his wealth he's giving up you know going to jail and got shot in the ear you know he's laying down everything to fight for our country um it's going to be really hard to move forward from being so bamboozled But yet, I feel like people are seeing things at a different level. At least I know I am. And I feel like there's a lot of that, especially out on X, where people are becoming more aware of how corrupt both parties are. And at the top, it's being run by the same entities, right? The banking system. Um, I don't know. I still have hope for

humanity, but I I look to people like you that have much more intelligence than I do. Like, how do we I love, you know, how you're like, "Okay, now we know their business model. They've laid it all out. It's not an enigma. We know exactly what they're doing, where they're going with it. Um, we may have a few years, if we're lucky. What can we do to combat this?" And so, I I applaud you and I thank you. I mean, this was a long podcast, but very informative and I really appreciate all that you're doing, Erin. >> Well, thank you and that that means a lot and I'm have a lot of respect for everything that uh that you've done and continue to do. And I mean, I am

optimistic. I to me this is just about people realizing re relearning that, you know, our rights don't come from government. We have inalienable rights and to take back our own agency and free will. And I think once people do that, they realize that it's about our own actions. And the way that we def, you know, defeat the technocracy and the tyranny is by by taking back our our own agency and exiting these systems. And it can happen, but but man, there's a lot of it's it's a it's a slow it's a slow process. And unfortunately, you know, from the time that I wrote, if you go back and read my book, when I when I originally wrote the book, people like, "Oh, this guy's nuts. This is

conspiracy theory." And now it's like, "Wait a minute." you know, because I'm writing like I this I have this first chapter. It's like this science fiction version of it and I'm talking about the maid program in Canada and everything else. I paint this sci-fi future, but it's all based on programs that exist in the world at the time that I wrote the book. Well, now like just three years later, all of this stuff is worse than I wrote about in the book. And so what people thought was a horrifying conspiracy theory is now like, h this is, you know, lame, right? Like that. like I I I wasn't I wasn't strong enough in the projection of of how quickly the tyranny could happen. And now we're

like, you know, now we're describing thing now I'm describing things that have already happened instead of warning people about things that might happen. And I have a hard time even keeping up with researching and describing what's already happened or what's or describing what's happening in real time. So somehow, you know, again, I I said at the beginning, I'm balancing my time between warning people and building the parallel systems. I need to spend more time on the parallel systems to make some of it easier for people to here's a step that you can take to get out of using the dollar. Here's a step that you can take. You know, one of the things that money is a problem, but the health care

system, as you know better than anyone else, the health care system is how they trap people. And all a lot of people have jobs they hate for insurance that they think will protect them, but it actually won't even protect you in an emergency because every minute in America, somebody files for medical bankruptcy. And 75% of those people are insured. It's not that the people that are filing for bankruptcy are people that didn't have insurance. They're overwhelmingly insured. 77% of them own homes. The insurance system is a scam. But yet people have jobs they don't like thinking that they must have this insurance but it doesn't help them anyway. So you know I've I've promoted

this idea through this OSAR uh medical tourism thing which has no business model. It's just a list of alternative services that people can use, but form a medical trust to protect your assets so that you don't end up going bankrupt in any situation. And then figure out how to start cancelling insurance and using alternative systems because the healthare system is a massive hook. And as you know, I mean, this is where they this is where they trap you. If you can if you can unlodge yourself from their money in their health care system, now you have more freedom. And then you can start to begin to see, hey, wait a minute, I have more choices. Most people think they only have Coke versus Pepsi

or red versus blue. But the universe is there more abundant than that. There's there are kind of unlimited potential if you can get out of the mold that they've tried to propagand propagandize us into thinking, you know, that we only have two decisions on everything. >> Yeah. I I'm really upset that Maha is just just evaporated before our eyes. There's so much that is so broken with healthcare. I mean, I had to transition to being a hospice nurse because ethically and morally, like just I'm so principled that I was like, I I took an oath to do no harm and I just want to take care of the symptoms because I did not believe in a lot of the diagnostic

remedies and interventions of traditional, you know, intervention medicine right now in America. I so much of it is just driven by, you know, if this, then this, if this, then this, and never actually looking at the cost or looking at the patient. Um, and prescribing things that aren't going to the riskreward just wasn't there. Um, it's so incredibly broken. It don't Yeah. Don't even get me started with healthcare. Um, >> yeah. >> Yeah, I talk about it. Yeah, I talk about it a lot. And again, it's it's one of the >> one of the leverage points. And so once people, again, it's all about reclaiming

our free will. And once people go back to realizing that our rights don't come from government, um, but that we have inalienable rights. Once you make that realization, then it changes your perspective on the entire world. But in the absence of making that switch that it's it's tough because then people still believe that, you know, they need a politician or a white knight to save them. And look, it's not even possible. I mean, this is the this is the problem. It's it's, you know, even if somebody had the best of intentions, if you go into this situation, it's kind of like I talk about with, you know, Congress, you know, we have two people out of 530 maybe, right? We're not making progress

there. I like Massie just because I actually think that what he's done with exposing the Epstein stuff once we really dig into this that's actually monumental because it's the truth about how the the world works. But I mean he hasn't realistically his votes haven't mattered much but at least he's gotten some truth out of it. I think that the best that we can get out of an elected politician is exposing both sides in what's actually going on so that people wake up and realize, hey, stop putting all of your hope and belief that that the people in this system are going to solve your problems. They're not. They're working against you and have been. >> Yeah, it's definitely a grind, but I I

just feel like we just need some strong leaders. We keep talking about all the problems and I don't feel like there's enough influencers out there that are talking about tangible solutions and that's that's what I appreciate about you Aaron is that I know your brain is not shutting off and you're trying to find a way to fix it and I think if all of us started working towards solutions it's like we're all paralyzed looking at the car accident but none of us are getting out and starting CPR and I feel like the fact that you're running for office, the fact that you're trying to come up with ideas, um you're writing a book, you're educating people, but you're going beyond that with, you know,

what is the next step? Is there a door we can open to unlock, you know, what we've, you know, painted ourselves into a corner, you know, the frog and the boiling pot of water. How do we jump out? Um, and I think, you know, that's not going to be a oneman show either. I think that's all of us have to put our thinking caps on so to speak and start really like focusing on solutions and quickly. >> Yep. I agree. And and so you know at daylightfreedom.org I list all the different sites that that we put together and part of these are sites that are about building community around u solutions and uh so certainly it's not a oneman thing. We've got to get other people on board with it. I I

mean there is again there's hope but there's the one thing that I've been before the 2024 election people were concerned about Claus Schwab and they were concerned about digital IDs and they were concerned about CBDC's and I mean I would do workshops and everything and they were packed and I you know like we were we were going around the country and then after the election people were completely disarmed and they believe well Trump signed an executive order we don't have to worry about that anymore. So the problem that we have right now is there are no speed bumps. We're getting all of the agenda 2030 stuff under different branding, but there's nobody protesting. That's been the hardest part

of this whole thing is that the resistance that we had is gone. And then some of it's been directly captured by the Trump administration because some of these people and I, you know, I'm gonna say ma maha, some of the MA people, there are some really good people that are part of Maha that don't like what's going on within Maha, but they're not speaking out because they still think that they can work within that system. And that's costing us. In my opinion, the best political activists I've known historically have been medical freedom uh advocates. And they're not they're silent now. The loudest voices that we've ever had are now silent because they've been captured.

>> I think captured and exhausted. You know what I mean? I feel like we climbed to Mount Everest and we thought we finally got some success. And I think the reality is setting in. I think a lot of us are realizing um that we're not that we were tricked. And so I I'm hoping that that righteous energy we had that came out of CO will reignite itself when we see stuff like Roundup being legalized, our farmers being bought out for data centers. You know, we can't get food on the shelves for our babies. I don't think this country is going to go down without a fight. I think the mama bears and the rednecks and the Americana,

you know, Midwest, you know, menly men are just not going to tolerate giving up their 2A or not being able to get food on the table for their families. Um, I think we're already seeing that start to rise up again. And it could come back. I'm hoping it that righteous anger will come back with a vengeance, even double, as people really start to wake up to the fact that Trump is blowing a bunch of smoke up our ass. >> I I think you're right. I It is happening. I mean, I think everything that you're doing is actually a prime example of that. I mean, you're leading that. I think even within New Hampshire, um I think you're leading that. I don't

know if other states are doing that. I don't, you know, I don't know if they're the equivalent, but what you're doing is the is the starting point. Again, there's some people that are going to be resistant all the way to the end. There's some people that are gonna that are going to, you know, uh remain in denial, but but those that aren't, that that's our those are our first uh first movers here. And uh but yeah, we don't have a lot of time. I mean, I again I what this podcast tonight, the one last week, um like they're moving really fast. And this thing with Iran is about technocratic expansion. Once you realize that all of these conflicts are about destroying things so that they can be

rebuilt, monetized, um not to be the moral force of the world or to free people. Um that's horrifying because we're on the brink of energy lockdowns. And so the question is, because I know a lot of us that fought the first time are like, "Well, that's never going to happen again." But but I don't know. I'm I'm not so sure. I I feel like a lot of people maybe thought that the COVID lockdowns were because of a small number of bad apples and not realizing that this is a more systemic problem. And so, are we going to buy energy lockdowns because it's not Fouchy and it's not medical and it's something else and it's Trump? Are we are or are we going to resist the energy lockdowns? And sadly,

we might be facing that sooner than we think. And it's weird that, you know, it's March, right? It's about it's been right at about six years. It's about the same same time of year and everything else. So, um, >> but I think a lot of people felt co was a test for something else. Like they're looking to see how we're all going to respond. And I mean, you heard a lot of that. And I have to say since I've had kind of my latest awakening when it comes to Israel, when it comes to, you know, um the war industry and how it is all manufactured just to be a transfer of wealth and at the expense of the taxpayer. as I verbalized and and kind of I spent like two or three months after Charlie

died like doing a deep dive because I knew everything I was finding was completely against the grain of the group I had created, right? And of course now I'm being called the liberal and everything else cuz but I'm like wait guys, time out. Charlie said Gaza was a genocide. Like why was he saying that? He's saying there was a a standown order. What is really going on here? And as I did all my diligence and and came up with more information, I had so many people say, "Oh, yeah. I'm glad you finally figured it out. I've known this for 10 years, you know, and people who had told me to go research USS Liberty and all this other stuff." But there's so many people, even pastors, that are

messaging me that are like, "You just have the courage to say it out loud." I'm like, "That's exactly what happened during CO. I was a clinician that just happened to stand out in the intersection between three hospitals that said, "This is bananas that you're firing people for not getting a man-made substance put in their arm." And it's like everyone behind closed doors wanted to say it. It's like saying what everyone's thinking, but finally having the courage to say it out loud. But, you know, if Charlie hadn't said it out loud and then if other people hadn't echoed some of those things to cause me to go do more diligence. Um, and I think that that does have a snowball effect. But

yes, I think the time is very short. I think they're going to try and move this very quickly. And I think a lot of people are going to be very unprepared when all of a sudden, you know, the electric grid goes out, heaven forbid, or gas is $10 a gallon and their wages haven't gone up. They're going to have to make some very We've lived a very cushy life here in America and we haven't really had to face the music. Um, it'll be interesting to see how this all plays out, but I think always building the framework, knowing that there's going to be more tipping points. We know the trajectory of this, we know where it's headed, and even if the people aren't ready yet. If we have a

skeleton and a crew of leaders who are coming up with viable solutions, then hopefully they'll be able to jump out of that boiling pot of water and have an alternative. But yeah, it's a grind. It's a real grind. Um, >> it is. And you know what? Let's and let's acknowledge what happens to people when they speak out. I mean, look at what happened to you. you were arrested and went through this whole ordeal. And this is actually part of the reason why I talk about these crypto prisoners of war of which there are now eight which has been expanding. Uh and they all have the common attribute of you know we talk about the fact that at the root of this problem is we have banks and the

military-industrial complex. Well, a lot of these people that have been arrested for crypto were promoting economic freedom. They were promoting they were promoting peace. They're promoting the use of cryptocurrency to stop central banks funding wars. They were promoting technology that uh protected people's fourth amendment right to privacy. And those are the people that have been attacked. So you were attacked. They were all attacked. So I think that we got to we have to do two things. One, speak the truth. And the more people that have courage because I know a lot of people that listen to this show talk to me privately and you know they agree with it. But everyone needs to

speak up. more people need to come forward and we need to defend the people that get targeted by the state when they do speak the truth. Um that's why I'm so eager to promote and to try to you know free some of these other other people. We have the enemies of the state event and to also um advocate for whistleblowers who expose government corruption. We have to defend defend that because part of the reason that they target people who speak the truth is to have a chilling effect. And we can't let that work. So not only do we have to defend the people that are out on the front lines speaking the truth, but we we need to also not let it have that chilling effect because they know

that that's an effective tactic and it's coming again. >> Yeah. No, it definitely. and they made a mistake realizing that you can't really chill a red head. So, that didn't work out for them. But, um it makes me want to double down. I have too much of my dad's blood in me. But, yeah. No, it takes a certain um ethos, I guess, to be able to say, you know, no matter what, you know, I I have a strong faith and I believe I have to pick up my cross and get walking. And you know, um, you know, my savior put himself up on a cross and was nailed to it and stabbed in the side and betrayed by everybody, right? But he did it because it was the right thing to do. So, you have to do what's right

regardless of outcome. And as a hospice nurse, then when you have that final breath, you'll know yourself whether you believe there's a maker or not, that you well done. You lived your life. You spent it. You did the best that you could no matter the outcome. And I think if all of us, you know, kind of get our mindset on that, like I'm determined to do what's right regardless of outcome. I don't care if we win. I don't care if they persecute. I don't care if the whole group goes away and they have no sphere of influence. I'm going to continue to march forward doing the next right thing. that the the power that we have and the authority that we have in our God-given rights to take back what

has been taken from us that if we linked arms for liberty, we could be very very powerful. And you know, when you say Nasha, there's no way that you could do anything in NSHA, you guys lost your mayor race by 300 votes. Like hardly anyone even showed up for that election and you could have flipped it. So people need to understand that you have this mindset of you can't because you're in a blue district or you can't do something. But I I would challenge that. I would say you we're living in a time where people are so discouraged or so overwhelmed they don't think the power of one matters. But you do. You're that match that you can light something and you can inspire others to just be a

little bit more bold, a little bit more brave. And if all of us did that together, it wouldn't just be a raindrop. It would be a mighty river, you know, making a new Grand Canyon. And that's really what we have to do. And that's you. Your music videos and the things that you're putting out do inspire people. And so I just want to encourage you, Aaron, to keep going, keep doing what you're doing. and anyone and everyone that might be listening just to to double down and and stand for for humanity because on your final breath as a hospice nurse you won't regret it. I know you won't. Um and the human experience. I mean what an exciting time to be alive. Like this is

a part of history that is when you step back and you zoom out like we are really in a really spectacular pivot point in history. And so be a history maker. Be part of it. Like embrace all that life has to give you. Um don't just be a wallflower. >> Well said. Well, I think that's a great way uh great way to end it. We've been on now for a little over four four hours and 17 minutes, but I think that's a great way to close it out. Um unless you have any other final final thoughts. >> Yeah, thank you for letting me join and sorry that I made it go so long. >> Oh, no wor I I this is why this is why this is here and I actually really

appreciate having you on and and respect um respect your thoughts and and insights. And on the way out, I'm going to play a couple songs. I have some new songs this week. Um, one is relatively new. It's it's Ditch the Dollar, but it's a song about uh bombing Iran and and killing all of the uh the young girls there. Um, 170 of them. Uh, and then there's one called uh we are the mapmakers, which is kind of expresses this this conflict that I have in how much time to spend exposing the problem versus building uh the parallel solutions. And then there's one other I played these in the beginning as well, but it's the sign my name and light. It's it's just about the idea of of kind

of rejecting the technocratic state that's being pushed on us through these click wrap agreements and through what I think is kind of the lack of of informed consent. So, I'll play those on the way out and um we'll see everyone here next Thursday at 6 PM. Have a great night. Another head hangs slowly. A child is slowly taken. She braided up

her hair that morning. Seven years old and forsaken. The missile found the classroom roll three seconds from the door. Mother cries into the evening. The same cry she heard before. But you see it's not me. Cuz I would drive and surround my daughter in a share in a school across the sea with their moms and their clothes and

their coins and their head in your head. They are fun with your dollar. When you're darling, when you're the star price, the sun sold 10,000 drones. The draft is on the table now, but the tall boy stays at home.

68 you go to war. 6' n you're free. One inch between the body bag and the boy who holds a key. But you see it's not me. It's not my family. The sun is one inch from the draft and a million miles from the infantry with their bombs and their clothes and their coins and their sons and their sons in your head. In your head they are falling with your daughter.

Your daughter 70 billion to rebuild what they bombed. Smart cities where the school used to stand. They call it the board of peace, but peace does not have a chairman. Peace does not need your money to exist. So stop giving it to them.

Every dollar, another missile, every dollar, another drone, every dollar, another checkpoint, every dollar, another home, every cent is a tiny bomb, every bill is a tiny page. Every dollar that you spend tonight on a tiny grave, but you see it's not me. It's not my family, but the dollar in my pocket built the bomb that's killed her. With their tanks and their moms and their dogs and their coins and their sons and their sons in your head in your head, you are

with your daughter. You're not sure. It's your door. Did your door. Another head hangs slowly.

A child is slowly taken. She braided up her hair that morning. Ditch the dollar. Bring her home. Heat. Heat. N.

We are the map makers. charting their control. Everything think tank, every doner, every NGO they own. Trace the lines from Brussels to the councils in New York, but the map was just beginning of the real work. And we realized halfway through the map's not the destination. It's the parallel we're building

that's the real creation. Oh, we're the map makers. Map makers, >> but we're building more. >> Building more. map their whole empire. >> Whole empire. >> Now we're building what's in store. >> What's in store? >> We're creating schools. >> We're creating trade. We're creating everything. The map just showed the way. I know where Claus Schwab d. I know who funds the who.

I know the names of every council, every plan they're pushing through. But I also know the farmer, building food outside their grid. I know the doctor healing freely. I know what the builders did. And the map hangs on my wall, a reminder of the past. But my days are spent creating futures that will last. We're the map and we're building now. building out

>> their whole system. >> Whole system. >> Now we're showing them how >> showing them how. >> We're creating money. We're creating care. We're creating everything. Life is great out here. Some nights I still study every note upon the chart. But then I look at what we're building and it fills my heart. We're not fighting their system. We're just making something new. The map makers became the builders.

That's what we do. So we'll map their every meeting, document their every scheme, but we'll spend our lives creating everything they couldn't dream. We are the map makers. Map makers, >> but we're builders most of all. >> Most of all, >> the map showed us the prison. >> Prison. Now we're answering the call. >> The call. >> We're the map maker. >> We're the map maker. >> And we're building free.

>> Building free. >> Map their whole control. >> Whole control. >> Now we're there'll never be. >> Never be. >> We're creating future. We're creating life. We're creating everything. Life is great tonight. M

building out the maker life somehow. We met their cave. >> We're building more. The map maker is opening the door.

Oh, live free or die, but death's not the worse. It's waking up empty. It's dying of thirst. Trading your days for insurance and pills. While the machine builds your cage and you're paying the bills quiet aspiration, that's the real grave. A life as a comfortable slave. This ain't what you were born for. You know

it's true. You feel it in your chest. Breaking through their wire in the walls. Closing in. Tracking your dollars underneath your skin. Left and right. Same throw, same crown. No one stands up. No one makes a sound. They hand you a ball like it means something real. Two wings are one bird. Same deal. Same steel. We say no to the tunn. This is the day that we ride.

It's right here. It's hurts right now. Your rights are yours. You take them back. Not giving out. Not from the left, not from the right. They were always yours. Now step into the light. The daylight breaks. A new day comes. We take it back. Every last one live free or die. We fan the flame. Nothing will ever be the same. I am afraid.

Hey,

They told me it was safer. Just a simple code to sign a number for the future. But it didn't feel like mine. >> Said the world was getting smaller. Just a finger away, but I can't hold my children through a screen of DNA. Oh, it's easy to surrender when they promise you a sky, but freedom dies in cover. One can sit at I won't sign my name in cold. I was born

in blood and soul. You can take my data, you can read my eyes, but my heart's still mine to hold. I will sign my name in cold. Wo my >> I'll find my name. >> They say it's just identity. They say it's just the way. But every scans a promise that our souls will fade to gray. No more numbers on the altar. No more saints of silicone. We were meant forever,

not longing on. You can wrap my face, you can mark my tone, but you'll never ride my soul. The melody belongs to every heart that's still holding on. Oh, I won't sign my name. I was born in love. Every day they wire melt it down with fire. Fire. Oh, I'll sign my name in gold. I'll sign my name in life.

>> Let the record show I was free. Then my name was written in love, not circuitry.