Third Party Is the Lever: 7 Races, 1 Senate

Welcome to the Aaron Day Show. I'm Aaron Day, founder of Stark Freedom Pack. Tonight at 6, we go live. I'll show you how we use third party candidates to hold both parties accountable and how that decides who controls the Senate. Seven states, seven third party candidates on the ballot. We fund the margin. It costs the GOP, the Senate. Here are the races before we go live. Who we back? Who we're up against? And the song we made for each one. Every song is at starkfreedom.org. So is everything else. First up is New Hampshire. We back Ed Lllant of the Constitution Party. We're up against Republican Jean Cenounu. Cenounu says he'll defend you from surveillance. He

voted to expand it in 2007. The song is called Ed Leant. >> [music] >> Kitchen TV [music] man in [singing] hand. I voted John [music and singing] win. Johnson voted yes on the Wall Street bailout [music] to over there's a Richmond mechanic who

names [music] the Fed plan to plan [music] said no I said no right back at him [music] sat on the devil's panel as our senator >> [music] >> It says no foreign wars, no foreign aid. [music] Johnson joined a cable company board [music] and a lobbying firm ethics cars and clocked in at Walmart too to pay the medical [music] bills under a hood in Richmond. It says the

[music] Fed answers to nobody. God devoted [music] on the Wall Street bail out to over [music] now there's a rich mechanic who needs a better plan I am [music] I am I am [music] off off I stand my turn. [music] Johnson no

[music] same [music] out the door [music] John Saludo voted yes on the Wall Street bail out to over no there's a Richmond mechanic who names the fed [music] >> [music] [music] >> I'm Get the plan. [music]

[music] This advertisement was generated in whole or substantially by artificial intelligence. Texas. We back Libertarian Ted Brown. We're up against Republican Ken Paxton. 60 Republicans in the Texas House voted to impeach Paxton in 2023. The song is called Guess What Texas. Our second Texas song is on the site, too. It's called Mouthpiece for DC. Your office offered one day.

Guess what, Paxton? A predator got [music] 60 days. Guess what? Texas [music] was t's [music] [music] got you bragging. Guess what? 60 like a win. Your [music] office offered one day till a judge stepped in. Camera on the pole. Leave me alone. Ted Brown's [music] committed to ending government's practice spying on everyone. Your office is offered one day. [music]

Guess what? A predator got 60 days. [music] Guess what? Texas was Ted Brown [music] cameras to monitor our movements. He's opposed. Your office offered one. [music] Guess what? [music] A got 60 days. [music] Guess what? Texas is Ted Brown. >> [music] [music]

[music] >> on tape. You said that convention hurt. Obviously [music] nothing to do. Your own president asked. hadn't heard that. [music] Guess what, Paxton? A predator got 60 days. [music] Guess what? Texas is [music] [music] this morning at the end. I'm Mark [music] Brown.

>> [music] >> Kansas. We back Libertarian David Graham. We're up against Republican Roger Marshall. Marshall called debt the biggest problem. He voted to raise its ceiling $5 trillion in July of last year. The song is called David Graham. [music] Truck radio fair debate. Roger Marshall common business practice [music] turning

some people into collections. Some people I'm [music] some people this line grand stands got theirs marshals practice [music] suit 700 patients 81 arrest shame on you there's a line out over park [music] David Kitchen [music] table, my ballot. Another doctor's collection letter. Marshall [music] talks like I'm in the bag.

[music] Kept reading past Marshall. David Graham over land. [music] He ain't a Democrat, neither am I. looked him up in 22. He wrote, "Freedom is the highest value. [music] Marsh 700 patience. Anyone rest to shame on you. There's a line out [music] over park. [music] Yeah. >> [music]

[music] >> Check Marshall's box for years. No [music] shame. Gave it free. Never [music] marshals packed a suit. 700 [music] patients, 81 arrest. Shame on you. There's a line [music] out of Overland Park. David Gra, [music] [music] shame on you. There's a line out over park. David Brown, [music] my pencil,

my life. [music] [music] This advertisement was generated in whole or substantially by artificial intelligence. Michigan, we backed Tim Long of the US Taxpayers Party. We're up against Republican Mike Rogers. Rogers voted in the House in 2013 to keep the NSA collecting your phone records. The song is called A Line Out of Taylor. [music]

>> [music] >> Ballot on my bench. Rogers on my phone says he buil [music] remember those. I voted for [music] him. 1981, [music] Mike Rogers built a se [music] from 95. There's a line out of Taylor Town long [music] 81 dri [music] 95 already Michigan state senator he [singing] asked me [music] to remember so I did 1981 [music]

Mike Rogers with a secret from [music] 95 there's a line at a Taylor Long [music] Tims on that valley lives in Taylor Rogers [music] came up 19,000 short before him along that ballot line and drew 41,000. [music] This vote ain't for Democrats. Mine never [music] was. 1981 [music] Mike Rogers just built a seab from 95. There's [music] a line out of

Taylor. [music] This street builds cars. [music] We know the years. 1981 [music] might ride. I just built a seam from 95. There's [music] a line at a table long off the pegboard [music] feeling.

[music] This advertisement was generated in whole or substantially by artificial intelligence. Ohio, we backed Libertarian Bill Red Path. We're up against Republican John Husted. Nobody elected Husted to this seat. Governor Mike DeWine handed it to him in January of last year. The song is called 14 marks [music] radio call.

Yeah. The [screaming] iron vote [music] 14 times. John Houston is on the end. It [music] fail by 49 to 50. There's a line out of Parisburg. Bill red [music] crease pencil on the drywall since March. One mark for every Houston know [music] my nephews over there. His pictures by the marks. Mark 14. Same [music] knows. I don't call him names. Back kill

[music] [music] [music] [music] stops on a page I pinned in 2008. It says black individual men that grows the government's power. Bill red [music] pass signed libertarian national chairman that's how I know the name same name Parisburg [music] man got his own line on the november ballot [music] for town John Houston said no to ending the war fell by 149 to 50 line out of Parisburg

red >> [music] >> March 3 April 3 May 2 June 3 July 2 September 1 54 [music] [music] [music] >> [music] >> 14 the kids picture [music] that yellow page I know where my mark goes in [music]

November pencils kept [music] >> [music] [music] >> Iowa. We back Libertarian Thomas Lane. We're up against Republican Ashley Henson. Henson voted in the House last year for the tax credits behind Summit's pipeline. The song is called Rechain,

the Dogs of War. [music] Harvest Co-op diesels [music] pass six a gallon. My nephew deployed his picturesized advisor. [music] Ashley Henson lights my phone. Shouldn't have to foot the bill at the pump. >> Hson [music] says she wants the water to end immediately. She voted to end [music] it six times. A county prosecutor already said it. Retain the dogs of war. Thomas L.

>> [music] [music] >> Words don't move a scale. Votes do. Thomas Lane, preachers kid from Allison taught [music] the Constitution. Now prosecute for Green County. She [music] wants a successful and immediate end. [music] says she wants a war to end immediately. She voted not to ending it six [music] times. A county prosecutor already said retain the dogs [music] to war Thomas. [music]

[music] [music] Thomas Lane says, "Every war since Korea, [music] presidents have taken our country to war unilaterally without a declaration of war from Congress. [music] Successful and immediate end [music] says she wants the war to end immediately. She voted no to ending it six times. [music] The county prosecutor already said it retain the dogs of war. Thomas [music] said she wants a warning and immediately she wrote a notice and it six times

[music] the county prosecutor already said retaining the dogs of war. [music] Thomas Lane. Nozzle clicks. [music] Still past six. My [music] mind's made up. [music] [music] And our newest race is South Carolina. We support Libertarian Casey Whitner for Senate.

[music] Darling Graham's one vote kept us at war. [music] Casey Wner says no more. >> [music] [music] >> months now in our own still over there. 49 said force the vote [music] 50 said no her mark among them. Darling GS one vote kept a sad warner [music] says no more than a vote to bring them

out one short again. Same name, same mark. Move that one mark in the [music] 50s are grappy [music] whitener says no more. [music] The governor's pin gave her that seat before one [music] ballot dropped. She told the debate stage, "National [music] security is not her thing." Darling [music] Graham's one vote kept us at war. Ky Whitner [music] says no more. Blame questions. Time to end the

war in Iran. Casey Whitner wrote her answer down. Yes. Out in the open for all of us to read. [music] Darling G one vote kept a [music] sad walk. Casey Whitner says no more. [music] Pickers County where she was born [music] went with the other man in the runoff that sleeps on loan. Come November that one vote [music] comes home to us. >> [music] >> I one vote kept the sad war. Casey whiteness says no more.

[music] [music] One boat kept a sad war. Crazy whitener says no more. [music] [music] [music] One more before we go live. Here's our anthem. Margin is calling.

>> [music] >> Wakey wakey margin is calling. >> Wakey [music] wakey. Margin [singing] is calling. [music] Every [singing] autumn in your colors. [music] Every promise song so sweet. I will cut your energy prices in half within 12 months. You [music] lie. >> Slow [singing] dance under the lights. You whisper no [music] more. >> You lie. >> You lie. Held [screaming] close. One

more vow. You swore you drain the swamp. You lie. [music] No more Jersey on reflex. No that votes [music] the color. You earn the vote or lose the Senate. [music] We are holding you accountable. Who pays? [music] We fun. Do [singing] you hear the margin calling? We fund [music] the margin. [singing] Because the GOP, the Senate >> so hard to say goodbye to the [music] Senate. >> You were the fun. [music]

>> Do you hear the margin calling? We find the margin. It cost the GOP, [music] the Senate so hard to say goodbye to [music] the Senate. >> You lie. You lie. You lie. You lie. You lie. You lie. [music] You lie. You lie. You li. [music] [music] Do you hear the margin calling? We fun the margin. [music] It cost the G the no hurt, no jersey, no reflex. Earn a voter or lose the [music]

Senate. >> [music] >> New margin [music] across the GP the >> no her no jersey no reflex [music] earn the vote or lose the Senate wy [music] [singing] wy wy Wakey wakey. [singing] Wakey wakey. [music] Margin is call.

That's all seven races. Every race and every song we made is at starkfreedom.org. Send them to someone who votes in one of these states. We go live at 6. Stay right here. [music] All right, welcome back to the Aaron Day Show. This is uh season uh 3, episode 26, and uh there's actually quite a bit to go through here tonight. Um, you know, I we will get back to the normal content at some point after the election. So, I suspect the next uh, you know, three episodes or so, probably four, will be more election

themed. Um, and this is primarily due to the fact that is where I'm spending all of my time, [clears throat] which might seem odd if you've been listening to the show. And you know, I've had previous episodes where, you know, we can't vote our way out. America 1.0 is over and so forth. You may be wondering what all of this is about. And so tonight, I'm going to lay out the entire strategy, what we're doing at Stark Freedom, why we're doing it, um, and h how it's going to function. And I have no doubt that it will work. Uh, based on our track record, um, my wife and I are doing this. We've been doing this for a long time and this is kind of the culmination of of our

experiences and the circumstances kind of brought us to doing this. So I I'll walk through the rationale for it. So again, everything that uh we do, everything that I have been working on is uh related to the uh hold on, let me get the right thing here up on the stage. Everything I've been working on is is based on this idea that the biggest threat that we face right now is is actually technocracy versus freedom. It's not political in the sense that it's the Republicans versus the Democrats. or even, you know, communism versus common sense, which is what the Republicans would want you to believe.

It's actually technocracy versus freedom. And technocracy is a political ideology, a global political ideology that basically replaces the rule of law, individual rights, property rights with a system of government where scientists and engineers make decisions for us and where the currency is removed. um and replaced with energy credits. And your ability to gain access to these energy credits is based on your compliance with the behaviors that these scientists and engineers lay out for you. This whole concept was started almost a hundred years ago in the 1930s and it's really only now that all of the technology has come together. It's kind of fascinating to think that this whole

model and this whole ideology predates the internet, predates digital currencies, predates AI surveillance, and it's really only been in recent years that the pieces have been put in place to make technocracy technically feasible. And so for the last, you know, three or four years, what I've been primarily talking about is how to exit the system. that in fact we can't vote our way out but we can build parallel systems and that that is the way forward and in fact you know I've even before I started talking about this publicly I was doing it uh the last time I voted was 2018 and you know after that I won't go through

the long history you can hear about that in other episodes um I decided to stop using the dollar to ditch the dollar um realizing that the basis of the control system is fiat currency, which is money governments print out of thin air based on debt. And they use that as as a the basis of a control system. And so I realized if you're going to exit and build, you need to stop giving them the power by using their money. And so this is just the first step. And then you know you you're we're talking about exiting everything, the health care system, even big tech, on and on down the line. So, as I did that, not too long, a few years after doing that, the people that

I knew that were the most effective at either promoting or developing these types of alternative systems were being targeted by the federal government. And so, that's when I realized, okay, we can't vote our way out, but unfortunately, um, the people that are focusing on exiting and building, and I well, I still do that. This is kind of part of a more comprehensive strategy. um the exit and build crowd is not moving nearly quickly enough relative to the technocracy side of things. And in fact, since Trump's was reelected, technocracy has accelerated without any friction at

all. What you have seen is everything from I'll give you an example, digital IDs. Well, we have digital IDs in the US. It's called Real ID and it's something that states fought against for 20 years. And in the first 120 days of Trump's second term, it was put into effect and now 14 plus states, Real ID is digital. And the plan is for it to be digital in all 50 states by 2028. People thought Doge was about cutting costs. Remember trillions of dollars of savings. We might be eliminating the income tax, all these other ideas. That was never the intent. The intent was what actually happened which was Palunteer was granted access to multiple federal departments including the IRS.

And so I will tell you that you know the 75,000 page 6 millionword tax code being efficiently administered by AI is not a win for human freedom. Uh you would probably want bureaucrats. Actually you wouldn't want taxes at all. Um taxation being theft. However, um bringing in AI, uh you're replacing you may be replacing the number of human beings involved in government, but you're not actually reducing the size and the function of government itself. In fact, you're massively increasing the power of government, which is precisely what has been going on across the board. So now we have more surveillance, we have more tracking. this is going to

lead into Medicare, Medicaid, predictive health scores, the whole nine yards. Then we had the the Genius Act, which is essentially a backdoor CBDC, paving the way for the government to be able to control privately issued digital dollars and to be able to add and enforce all of the surveillance that we have on our traditional money supply. So you will have all of the know your customer, all the reporting to the Treasury Department, all of that other stuff. And they will force these private stable coins to be backed by US treasuries, increasing the debt by another three to four trillion dollars. So Trump came out and said, "Yeah, we're not going to have a CBDC." And what he

did was implement effectively the exact same surveillance except at faster scale because what would have taken years to implement through a central bank is something that's already wildly popular already greater in transaction volume than Visa. uh and they've just made it they've captured it under the control of Congress and then they tried to push the Clarity Act which fortunately hasn't passed yet but that will essentially digitize everything that you own and put those assets your stocks, your bonds, your house, your car under the same uh control that they're putting digital money under. So they can track your transactions in real time, freeze your transactions, share that information

with our own government, with foreign governments and foreign central banks. It's tied into the Patriot Act, the whole nine yards. So, so this technocracy has accelerated and there's nothing stopping it. And the worst part about it is that people don't even know. Before the election in 2024, people were saying things like, you remember America first? Can you imagine such a concept now? I mean, I I don't I don't see anyone with a straight face making the claim that what's going on right now with our government is America first. But part of that part of the presentation of that is we're going to shut down, you know, Claus Schwab and the WF and the UN and all of these other things and we're

going to reclaim our our sovereignty and we're not going to do, you know, the Claus Schwab vision of things with 15minute cities and all the surveillance. And the truth is that that's exactly what we've done, but we've given it different names. We've marketed as things like genius and and uh clarity act and uh you know, real ID and we've dressed it up uh you know with the flag called it patriotism even the way that we've been implementing AI which obviously I'm a fan of but not the way that the government is doing. And we now have another AISAR J Clayton that is basically going to hand over more and more and more control to Silicon Valley which has nothing to do with free

markets. It's more government regulation, more censorship, more top- down control than subsidized by taxpayers. And so this has been going on undebated. So what started out as as the idea of warning people about technocracy and pushing people to exit and build has now extended. It's no longer exit and build. It's expose obstruct exit and build. And this is just a natural evolution of trying to exit and build and watching the government's response and realizing hey you know we're not going to be able to do this. You go to enough conferences where you see uh whether it's a crypto conference or you know another type of conference where you just say okay well you know

how fast is this movement growing versus how fast is the surveillance state growing versus you know the growth and proliferation of flock cameras versus the growth and proliferation of digital currencies and and so forth and and the answer is it's it's not good. I'm not saying this to say that it's hopeless. In fact, I'm more optimistic now in part by what I'm going to say tonight than I have been in a long time. But I realize that it requires these four areas and these four areas have to be done all at once. Now, it doesn't mean I have to be doing them myself all at once. However, I we are and you know, in part it's just to help, you know, get the ball rolling in some

of these areas. Uh on the exposed front, we have Teocracy Atlas, uh which uh is going through a major upgrade right now, but you can still see the the original version of it. And for the state of New Hampshire, you can see the upgraded version of it where I've gone through and uh uh I have a couple computers that are running non-stop categorizing contracts and everything at a against 12 different dimensions and getting all of the raw data. The whole point of it is so that you can see what's going on with technocracy in your state. What's going on with, you know, not only flock cameras, what's going on legislatively with digital currencies, what's going on with privacy, AI legislation,

um, uh, all of that. And so you'll be able to track in real time and see what's going on. And in part, you know, that's the first part, which is to expose. And then the Aaron day show this show is a platform for exposing this and in fact it's also a platform for communicating the other three areas as well. But the next area that is important and why the stark freedom pack was formed uh is to obstruct because I was noticing something. So, you know, if if you have watched this podcast, uh, you know, I've been talking about technocracy uh, at great length and brought on a number of guests, done roundts, the whole nine yards to explain the origins of it and the history and

who's behind it and so on and so forth. Um, but what I've realized is we're almost at a point now where when people become aware of something but can't do anything about it, it's actually demoralizing. You're not actually helping. The truth will not set you free. In fact, I was on another podcast earlier today where they almost now flaunt it. They flaunt the fact that they're doing this stuff. Like, you know, Howard Lutnik being a perfect example. Makes made $250 million this year. $250 million profited off of the tariffs. And people across the country, everyone is hurting because of the tariffs. He pushed the tariffs. Then his family bet against the tariffs and made

tons of money. He flaunts that, you know, he he just jokes about the fact that he was on Epstein's Island, lied about it. Um he's he's, you know, part of the new creature from Epstein's Island. This whole new digital dollar system, his company, uh is backing the treasuries, managing the treasuries for the largest stable coin in the world, and they don't care. You call out the corruption. Many people have called out the corruption. In fact, a whistleblower um that had exposed and revealed some things about Lutnik, you know, just uh mysteriously died of suicide this week. And and here's the thing, nothing happens. Thomas Massie, and I have great respect, probably the

best thing that I've ever seen done in Congress, expose the Epstein files. And as you know, the technocracy at Alice, we I've downloaded I have all the Epstein files, created viewers for it. I've gone through it. And if you go through these Epstein files, you'll realize in which are, you know, we only have a partial view of, but you can start to understand that the world doesn't work the way the media and, you know, government and the powers that be try to frame that it works. And so what is the upshot of this? Nobody on Epstein's list has gone to jail. And then Trump, Miriam Adelstein, and others targeted Massie and took him out in a primary. So I I realized this that you know so

this path of just you know coming on here every week and exposing oh here's a new element of this here's how these pieces fit it's intellectually interesting but it doesn't change the fact that the digital prison is being built around us and they're at a point right now where they flaunt it. These people are in government and they flaunt it and there are no consequences. And so that that's not going to help things. And so this obstruct category is here because there are some things that we can do. And I've always said we can't vote our way out. And that is still true. But what we can do is gum up the system, gum up the electoral process. You know, they use the two-party system

to keep us um to keep us captured, red versus blue. I mean, think about how absurd it is. People will will uh Trump even came out recently and said, "Hey, you know, you may not like us, but vote for us anyway because we're better than the other guys." We're down to the point where literally the argument is effectively our rapists are better than your pedophile and you better be on our team. And that is an act of demoralization. That is a humiliation ritual when time after time you fall for it again. Every time you fall for it and then you're guilted into falling for it again because it might be worse if the other people are in power, which it isn't. It's always getting worse no matter

who's in power. Um, so participating in the system that the way that they want you to like a good little slave doesn't work. But you can do things like I'm going to talk about tonight, strategically use third parties to literally determine the control, which parties have control. You can use a third party in tossup races to literally change the entire dynamics of which party is in power. And more importantly, you can use it the way that I'm trying to use it, which is to create gridlock because the best system of government is no system of government or is people working on these parallel systems. But outside of that, we're not in that realm right now. We have this massive $40

trillion debt surveillance state government that is preventing us from being free, draining us of all of our resources, and stripping us of our free will. And so, what are we going to do about it? Well, we need to slow it down to give more time for the exit and build people. And so tonight, I'm going to talk about how we're using third parties to do this immediately in this election and it it works. I've already proven it and I'm just scaling it at this point. The other thing that we are doing, we've we've launched Karma. This really I mean I've just kind of put a placeholder up karma.org or um or.com. Uh it is when I ran for US Senate, as as you may recall, they tried to keep me off the

ballot and I defeated the attorney general in federal court using AI prosay representing myself. Something that would have cost 400 to 600,000. And what I realized is and the way that I built this out, this isn't just going to chat GPT and typing in, you know, draft this lawsuit. I spent 200 hours and if I have [clears throat] a pretty massive AI system that I've I've calculated I've got about 4,000 hours into building and quite a bit of money. But I realized that trying to make those tools available for others is a way to not only stop the you know milic malicious prosecution that we are experiencing from government at all levels but also it's a tool that

can be used to combat uh flock cameras and technocracy you to typically where we're at a disadvantage is and I mean they call it lawfare because because it works it's the actual cost and time involved with going through the process. That is the problem. I mean, they can tie you up for years. And if they're a multi-billion dollar corporation and you're an individual, what are you going to do? Well, the dynamics change if all of a sudden, imagine if there were a hundred lawsuits being filed in a hundred different jurisdictions against flock where the people are representing themselves proay. This flips the entire dynamic. So, the use of a third party strips or actually holds

the two major parties accountable. The use of AI in a legal context where people can use it pros seay changes the power dynamic in the what has been the egregious abuse of the law system against the people for decades. Then there's exit. And certainly I'm not going to stop promoting these things or doing these things. In fact, as you've noticed, I mean, most of this year, frankly, this podcast has been, we only have 100 people on now. I am severely shadowbanned. I would appreciate if you would uh share this, but I mean I mean like I'm I'm actually going through the analytics now. I mean, this is this is a massive shadowbanning that's that's happening. And and that's fine. And I've

been saying this, this is Elon Musk is a technocrat. So if you're uh and he talks about freedom of reach, if you're talking about technocracy, if you're talking about things that are are counter to his position, they can tweak the algorithms. They do tweak the algorithms. We we've watched him do it in real time. He did it around H-1B visas and everything else. We have no free speech. And in fact, we have the illusion of free speech, which is worse than where when we had the censorship industrial complex under CO where at least we knew we were being censored. There are people out there that I still hear every day. Well, thank God for Elon Musk for saving free speech. You have been completely

scammed. So, I'm still promoting Ditch the Dollar. Um, and you go to ditch the dollar.com uh with steps on how you can get into privacy coins and use alternative currencies, own nothing.org, which shows you basically how we've signed away our rights and our ownership through click wrap agreements. And then daylight freedom, which I'll be building out more next year, but it's basically, you know, a a series of tools to help you reclaim your sovereignty. And it allows you to see, well, you okay, once you realize, oh, wait a minute, the dollar is a control system. It's used against me. My money can be shut off. My money can be tracked. My money can be programmed. Oh, wait. My attention is

being hijacked by big tech. My food is being poisoned by big food. The health care system is not making me healthy. it's actually uh tethering me to employment that I don't like and then not allowing me not actually helping me when I have a catastrophic situation. Uh 10 different dimensions to help people uh along the way to get out of the system. And that's actually where we really end up wanting to spend most of our time. That was kind of the the original thing that we started was daylight freedom and then it's kind of it's morphed into all of the things that you now see on your screen because these are kind of impediments and roadblocks that we have seen in trying to exit the

system. And then there's build and it's building the actual solutions uh when you exit which you know we've built some of our own but then we're also building tools more importantly uh to connect and bring in other other resources. there are there are many people working on this but it's very hard for people to find this stuff and most of it is spread out um and and you know frankly I had an interesting conversation with somebody I think last week where it's you know even if you have information that is censorship resistant you can figure out a way to post information using things like IPFS where it can't be censored um that's great except how are people going

to find it you know we went from a period of time where search engines used to actually you know, not be censored in the in the early days to then becoming over a long period of time. I mean, you know, we have like a 10-year run, but then now increasingly it's like, okay, this thing is like sanitized by public health, all these other safeguards and everything else. Um, but now more people are getting their information from AI than even search engines. So then you have to ask yourself, well, what are the search engines training on? So, so people feel like they're empowered because they have these tools and these platforms that say they're free speech or you're using an AI, but that AI is

only trained on certain data. And then on top of that, it has these these other guard rails put on top of it, which the government is actually intervening uh to to make sure uh is even further sanitized. So, this is problematic. Um, but in any event, on the build side, we have Freedom Forge, which has guides to uh educational materials for how to, you know, you get off of the dollar and into other cryptocurrencies, but also it will have guides for other areas as well. And it's going to be a community area where other people can start to figure out how to build their own solutions. And a lot of this is based on using, you know, privacy coins and privacy tokens on

platforms like Zeno. And then the last is OSAR which is a medical tourism marketplace that we've built where yeah you can exit the insurance system you can actually buy medical services overseas and it's about 80% cheaper with higher quality than you get in the United States. So I I'm saying this to set the stage for why where this super PAC fits in to all of this. I have not abandoned. In fact, this is I realize this is a necessary tool this pack in the area of obstruction because if we don't do this, if we have two more years of complete Republican control, uh agenda 2030 will be here by agenda 28. That is literally how fast this this is going. And so I've realized, you know, again, I go to

enough of these conferences like, all right, we're going to have to do something about this. We can't just say um don't vote um or I'm not saying the voting doesn't help. Strategic voting the the strategic um treating the voting process strategically to stop it and obstruct it is is critical at this point and I would like to not do it but it is it's something that I know how to do and uh needs to be done right now. So, in any event, [clears throat] I already spoke about karma. I'll do an episode on that probably at the end of the year um launching on how to do that. But I have actually been talking to people all over the world. Uh you know, what I've learned about my system is like I I

tailored my system specifically for my lawsuit in federal court based on, you know, situations in New Hampshire. And so much went into, you know, setting it up for that, you know, information. So, I can't like take my system and say now all of a sudden if you're in Arkansas, you're in a different country, it applies. But I have been working with some people on case by case basis to help develop out the system for specific cases and it's continuing to build in terms of applications. So, that is I am working on it behind the scenes. It's just not something I'm not entirely sure how to make it publicly available because it's based on my own equipment and my own data. So working on that. Um

[clears throat] so moving into the main topic for tonight which is the Stark Freedom Pack. Uh what you can see on the screen right now is this is this is really the the visual of what's going on here. The Senate is highly contested right now in terms of uh who is going to be in control. I mean I think people mostly now understand the Republicans have lost the House. Everything is going to come down to the Senate. And I was originally running uh for US Senate in New Hampshire because I thought it was going to be a 50-50 race and I you know I could use that race as leverage to get the administration to do what they said they were going to do. I mean I got to the point where I it was my

understanding the administration was going to do some of those things. So I dropped out of the race. They did not do those things. So in addition to lying and not doing what they said they were going to do, I believe I was also lied to. So it you know it's just one thing after another. I mean the the administr it's like all you had to if they wanted to know how to win the election they could start by doing what they said they were going to do but apparently that's off the table. Apparently you have to vote for them again after well yeah we lied to you this first two years but give us another shot and here's $5,000. And so at this point you know so when I say

this these are seven races where a third party is basically the margin is going to be the margin of difference. They're they're tossup states and we're supporting candidates that are likely to pull more from Republicans and the races are so close that these third parties are likely to be the margin of difference and change the outcome. I know this works because I did it. I did it in 2016 in New Hampshire. I recruited an entire slate to run for US Senate and the two congressional seats. I ended up being the candidate myself for US Senate. We were the margin in all three races. As a result, it was the first time since 1854 that New Hampshire did not have a

Republican in Congress and they haven't had one since. And so I know that this works and so um so now we're spreading this out to seven different states. And I've been surprised the states that we're in, by the I mean, I if you would have told me 30 days, 60 days ago that Kansas was in play, Iowa was in play, Texas, South Carolina, these are all states now that are toss-ups. And some of these are actually now leaning Dem. It's It's actually It's fascinating. And let me tell you what I learned running as a as a third party. I mean, I got like 2.4% 4% or whatever in what was

the most expensive US Senate race per capita and I spent no money. And so here's why the strategy I'm laying out for you tonight, here's why I know it works. It one, it doesn't require massive amounts of money. Two, we are at a point in time where people are absolutely fed up with the Trump administration. I mean, I have been talking to people all over the country about what's going on. And I will tell you that that first and foremost, the cost of everything is an issue. I mean, it was that old statement, it's the economy, stupid. And that's absolutely true. And everyone is hurting everywhere. And you go into states that were Trump's strongholds. You go

into the Midwest and some of these other areas, they're being hurt the most. And the areas where they're being hurt the most are are you know one of the areas is in in o oil gas and diesel which is related to you know being involved in farming. This is a major cost element and then everything else by extension costs more. And so there have been two massive [clears throat] screw-ups by the Trump administration. One was tariffs which have failed massively and have increased the price of goods for everyone. And then the other is the Iran war which is immoral and unjust in its own right but then it's made the cost of oil that much worse. So Trump goes around and makes

these statements about how great things is. He's he's losing literally areas that no one ever considered would be in play. And by supporting third-party candidates, th this is basically the argument. All there are these people that are say, "Oh, well, you're throwing away your vote." I'm telling you right now, you're absolutely not throwing away your vote because what you're doing is you're actually saying, "Yeah, are these candidates going to win?" No, they're not going to win. But but you're saying this is actually what we want to see. We have this rigged third party, you know, two-party system, but the attributes of these candidates are what we want to see, and we're not going to just hold

our noses. We're going to hold you accountable. It's not enough for you to say, "Oh, the Dems are worse." You need to be held accountable and these guys are the vehicle to do it. And it also sends the message to the Republican party that you need to move in this direction. You need to recruit candidates that are like the candidates that we're supporting for third for the third party, like these Libertarian candidates, Constitution Party candidates, national taxpayer candidates. People can send a direct message. They don't have to pick the lesser of two evils. They can change the outcome. They can hold the Republicans accountable and vote for someone that actually

reflects their values. And even though that person doesn't win, it does hold the Republicans accountable. And it does send a message that this is the way that we want you to go. And once the two major parties realize they can't just get away with humiliation rituals and shaming people every election, they their behavior will have to change. So third parties are absolutely critical. And I also want to say it is a two-party system. That is the nature of how it's structured. But it isn't always the same two parties. It hasn't always been just Republicans and Democrats. We've had the wig party. We've had other parties um uh you know throughout history that that you know

were were more dominant and so you know who's to say I mean we people call what we currently have the uni party maybe those two parties merge and we have a new third party we have Tucker Carlson Thomas Massie Marjorie Taylor Green others talking many people talking about forming a new third party or maybe it's one of you know the Libertarian party or or another party but but the point is that it is useful to do this because it holds them accountable and it creates gridlock. And this is important not because you can save this. I don't believe that you can save our political system. We just need to buy enough time to be able to build alternative solutions before they build the digital

cage. That's very simply what I'm trying to say. So, we are supporting candidates and I'll go through these in detail each each race in New Hampshire, Ohio, Michigan, Iowa, Kansas, Texas, and as of today, South Carolina. And I believe that our candidates will end up being the margin in three or four of those races. And I believe our super PAC will be what gives the increased margin in many of those races. And here's here's why. So when I ran uh you know I had this interesting situation where [clears throat] some group illegally paid for mailers. We don't even know who they are. I had no I have no idea who they are and it

was illegal what they did but they sent these targeted mailers trying to specifically pick off Republican voters that were would vote for Kelly Aayat and I believe this this gave me a boost. This this probably actually added a th000 or 2,000 vote. It wouldn't have mattered anyway because well actually yeah it did matter because I got almost 18,000 votes. Kelly lost by only 1,17 votes. And so here's the interesting thing about most of these third party races. These candidates um have almost no money in all of the cases. And the other thing is they are usually not able to participate in the debate. We have a couple of of exceptions in this case, but usually the third party candidate uh

doesn't meet the eligibility requirements to even be in the debate. So the biggest issue for third parties is people have no idea who these people are, that they even exist. But at this point in time, Trump's approval rating is like 39%. I saw one poll that had it at 31%. People do not want to vote for Trump. And many people are actually actively saying they're going to vote for the Democrat. But if they knew that they had this other choice. So so little has to be spent if you're targeting specifically disaffected Republicans, you know, Republicans who are Massie supporters, anti-war Republicans, uh, you know, Republicans that were, you know, against the tariffs. It's it's not

hard to target those specific people with this message because they they do not want to be fooled again. And by the way, remember how fooled people were? Remember this like we're going to rescue the republic and the only way we're going to save Western civilization and they had these like you know Tulsi Gabbard and and and VC and RFK is is adventures. It was all And I as you if you've listened to this show I told you it was all And it turned out to be 100% Even worse even worse than I projected that it would be. And I knew it would be bad. And so a lot of people feel really stupid for doing that. Um and and so so much so that they're not

going to fall for it again. They're not going to fall for the fear again. They're not going to say, "Well, yeah, but we can't go back to the other guys. You got you just said you were going to do 10 things. You did zero of them. And now people can't afford food, health care, or their mortgage, and they may have to send their kids to war unjustly. It's not it's not flying. So, I I believe this too. I think you're going to see absolute record uh results for these independent and third party candidates. And I also think this is going to be a big deal when this story is written at the end of this race. As I said, I've already got a couple of big media things coming out

next week. When people find out what's going on here, this is going to be a big deal. And what's the big deal about it is that this gives us some of our power back. This gives us the ability to say no, I'm not. You want to give me this, you know, two-party stuff. I I'm not buying it. And by the way, we have the leverage now. I mean, imagine if we do with this super PAC help influence and determine the outcome of the US Senate. This will have been done with very little money. And by the way, just like I did it in 2016 with almost no money. I already know it can be done. I've already done it. and they can't do anything about it because this is what I found in when I did this in 2016.

The only response of the two main parties to these third party candidates is silence. They have to ignore you. They don't want you in the debates because if people actually listened to what these third party candidates have to say, they might actually vote for them. And so the entirety of it is about suppression. So, so this is why I can literally sit here on this podcast. You probably have never seen this before. I don't even know if this is done. I've got a super PAC. I'm laying out my strategy. I put all this stuff on the website. Here's what we're doing. Here's exactly what we're doing. Most people like, you don't know who's behind the super PAC. It's all this other, you

know, what are the what are the motives? I'm telling you exactly what I'm doing. And I'm telling you exactly why I'm doing it. And here's the great thing. It will work. And there's nothing they can do to stop it. And that's part of why I'm doing it. I've just exposed the entire thing. And so this is going to get a lot of press attention. And again, we'll see. We'll see how it plays out. But I've done it before. And so this becomes a tool just like the ability to use AI to defeat the state and big tech in court. This now becomes a tool that we have. This isn't the solution. We're not going to fix government, but we're going to buy time. So last year or excuse me at the last

election there were 58 races were won by less than the third party vote. So in many respects this has been going on anyway and people get blamed for it. They get called after the fact, oh you're a spoiler. Well how about this? Let's embrace spoiler. The message to voters is yes. You're going to spoil this. You're going to take away political power from Donald Trump who has destroyed the economy, handed over the surveillance state to big tech and to his own family and gotten us into an unjust war. So yeah, you know what? We're going to spoil that. Why? Because there needs to be accountability when people do things like this. So embrace it. I I'm no, you know, people

even when I do interviews, are you worried about being a spoiler? I'm trying to be a spoiler and in fact I only trying to be expo I'm explicitly telling you that I'm going to be explor a a a spoiler and how I'm going to do it and then I'm going to tell you furthermore when it's successful we're going to do more of it next time. Now right now this is directed at the Republicans. Why? Because the Republicans are in power and the Republicans have not been held accountable. This approach can work with Democrats as well. So you could recruit Green Party candidates or candidates that are more to the left if you need to hold the Democrats accountable. And as I said, the best

form of government practically that we can have in this country is gridlock. Gridlock as we move towards building our alternatives outside of the system. So again, they always tell you it's a two-party system. Vote red or blue. I'm going to fully embrace how idiotic that is. How idiotic it is that you've got to shut up and vote and support people that protect pedophiles and that steal your money and that and that will actually almost kind of laugh at you about the fact that well yeah, you know, we didn't do any of this, but you know, and you may not like us, but vote for us anyway. No, stop that behavior. Incentives mean anything. And if they're able to use that humiliation ritual,

guilt to keep you voting for what you know is the wrong thing to vote for. I mean, who wants to vote who would vote for Donald Trump right now? The only argument you would have is, well, at least he's better than Camala. But nobody actually wants to vote for him. This is the problem with society in general. We live in a society where people are playing backup plan their entire lives. Well, I don't know. I have this thing that I'm passionate about, but I was told I have to go to college, which you didn't want to do. And then you went to college to get a job you don't want. And then, you know, 20 years later, you're in a situation you can't get out of, and you never wanted to do any of

it. And your and your purpose and your soul has been crushed every sense, every step of the way. This is how the voting system works. So, let's upend this while we go and build these systems. I'm telling you, we can have all of the leverage here. Massive amounts of leverage. This does not cost a lot of money. And just to make I'm going to make this clear about exactly what it is that we're dealing with here just to remind people. Um Oh, hold on. I've got to let me uh switch. I'm going to little collage of uh collage for you. >> I will cut the price of energy and electricity in half. Ready?

12 months from January 20th, within one year, think of it, within one year, you're going to have electric bills and energy bills and your gasoline for your car is going to be 50% cheaper than it is right now. Countries that were ripping us off for decades are now paying us hundreds of billions of dollars. And as time goes by, I believe the tariffs paid for by foreign countries will, like in the past, substantially replace the modern-day system of income tax, taking a great financial burden off the people that I love.

It is time to drain the swamp in Washington, DC. First, I'm going to reinstitute a 5-year ban on all executive branch officials lobbying the government for 5 years after they leave government service. It's just very strange for a lot of people that uh the list of clients that went to the island has not been made public. Yeah, it's it's very interesting, isn't it? Probably will be, by the way. But yeah, I'd be inclined to do the Epstein. I'd have no problem with it.

>> I know it's a hoax. It's started by Democrats. It's been run by the Democrats for four years. I call it the Epstein hoax. My wife and I decided that I will never be in the room with that disgusting person ever again. >> Did you in fact make the visit to Jeffrey Epstein's private island? I did have lunch with him as I was on a boat going across on a family vacation and we had lunch on the island. That is true.

So, I mean that's the question. Did you Did you fall for it again? Are you going to fall for it again? Again, what was presented in 2024 at the time, I it was just me. It was so laughable that people thought, well, we were going to, you know, get medical freedom. We were going to do all this. None of it. None of it happened. These are pretty major things. Suppressing Epstein and then voting the guy out and putting $30 million behind the guy that exposed corruption, not draining the swamp, not lowering energy prices. Tariffs didn't do anything to re to alleviate income tax. Doge did nothing. All of it. Every single major thing is a lie. And now we're in war. So what? We're going

to reward those people. I think not. We can't continue to do that if we have no standards at all. This is, you know, the funny thing is I've never ended up I've never had to fight Democrats as much as I've had to fight Republicans. And part of it is I tried to work within the Republican party. I mean, I gave up on that a long time ago. I think after the way Ron Paul was treated, many people left. And now there's a new crop of people that apparently didn't get the message from 2012 that literally think that the way to get liberty is through the Republican party. There's just zero evidence to support that. And they're pushing the humiliation ritual. And most of the

people that are doing that want power. They're being paid. A lot of those people are being paid and influenced by Peter Teal. That's a separate conversation. I've got many episodes about this. But we have to absolutely push back on this idea that you have to to uh vote for either one of these. Again, what we need to vote for right now is obstructing the system and creating gridlock so that we can develop alternatives. I'm not saying, in fact, I'm not even saying by voting third party we're going to end up with a third party and they're going to come in and save things. This thing is like structurally broken. But if we don't slow it down, uh we are going to find ourselves enslaved.

We're already mostly enslaved. I mean, I I talked about the own nothing thing. We've already given away most of our rights. People don't own their own investments. They don't even realize they don't actually own their 401k. Health insurance doesn't protect you. The debt is insurmountable. Uh and the surveillance systems that they're putting in are very soon going to be very hard to escape. And then people will find themselves in a situation again where, well, you know, yeah, I'll take the boweapon because I don't have a choice. It's for my job. You always have a choice, by the way. But, um, they're very good at manipulating and nudging people one small piece at the time to

the point where you don't think you have a choice because you have spent your entire life being convinced with every aspect of your life, Coke versus Pepsi, United Healthcare versus Signar, whatever, that that your whole universe of choices is always binary. But you actually have an infinite amount of choices outside of the system itself. But but people are not catching on to that. And so then as you march closer then the next time there's a collapse that they create, they have already developed the solution for it. And you'll sit there and say to yourself, well, you know, there's nothing I can do about it. I guess I have to take this because you don't see an alternative. So [clears throat]

So there's massive cost of believing again. Every time you do this, you know, a piece of your soul, a piece of your purpose, a piece of your light dims every time you make a decision that you know goes against your own morals and what you know to be true. And that is the ultimate cost of participating in the two-party system. And we just need to be very candid with people about this. In fact, well, I'm going to I'll be running ads about this. This again, I believe this is going to work and it and it has it has nothing to do with me. I'm just creating the vehicle for people to express how they actually feel and it will send a massive message. Uh if I mean I can tell you there are

right now there are there are many people in Washington DC and in other places that are quite uh quite worried about this right now as they should be. So, so this is it. I'm saying we're not putting up with it anymore. The third party is the lever to obstruct the system, not to fix it, to obstruct it. And this election is a perfect opportunity to do it. These races are razor thin, doesn't cost a lot of money, doesn't take even a lot of effort. Uh, and then we can stop the surveillance state and then send the message to these guys that we're not putting up with this anymore. We're not cattle. We're not going to be forced into your false choice. There is a wakeup call for you.

Enjoy gridlock for 2 years. We're going to pursue alternative currencies. We're going to pursue alternative health care systems. We're going to pursue alternative living arrangements, communities, governance models. That's what we're going to do with this free time. you guys can figure out, you know, how you're going to, you know, come up with new ways to hide the Epstein list, but, you know, make yourself look like you're trying to expose it at the same time. Whatever the hell it is you do, covering up sexual harassment lawsuits with taxpayer money, do what you do best and do it with great conflict amongst yourself. Uh, great waste of taxpayer time, but but gridlock is the answer.

So, with that, this is the first race that we are supporting. And by the way, not necessarily in priority. I will say this that the the pack is focused on maximizing the damage to the Republican party and flipping as many seats as possible so that we can achieve gridlock. That is the purpose. And this changes over time. Remember, I started out in this as a candidate or almost as a candidate. I guess technically I was never officially even a candidate, but I I started out because New Hampshire looked like it was going to be a toss-up state. And the funny thing about it is the day before I dropped out or two days before I dropped out, there was the first and only poll

that had John Eenu ahead of Chris Papis, the Democrat, and he was ahead by three points, which would be the margin would be the margin that I would capture probably plus some. There was a Rasmusen poll that came out after I dropped out that had me at 4%. But that was a fleeting moment. Since that time, Sunnu has fallen off and and the Dem is now up six, seven point I think the latest poll is seven points. I think the average is six or seven points. And so right now this race who we're supporting Ed Lllant uh who is the Constitution Party candidate. Um I mean he have to do really well to to to well to influence the outcome. he's going to pull more Republicans because

it's the Constitution party. Um, and you know, so I mean at this point from the standpoint of influencing that dynamic, um, you know, there's not there's not a lot that we need to support, but I do think that this race is going to tighten. And I, you know, I have more of a feel for this race than probably most people on the planet just because I've lived it for a decade. And so what you see in the polls right now, when you see these maps, understand it's going to change. Some of these things are going to tighten. And there's a lot of establishment money behind Johnny Cenounu. And there are a lot of weakwilled people that are trying to dress up and act like this guy is a

libertarian because they think it's going to help them at a local level. And then there's Miriam Aden putting 17 million money into a pack that's putting $17 million. So the same pack that defeated or not the same pack the same funders that cost Massie his seat are funding Johnny Eenu. So that lets you know where he is. So this race even though right now it's the margin is not that close. Um, we are still going to support ED and I suspect, you know, increase the support as we get closer to the election as they bring in, you know, fake TPA, you know, Turning Point USA employees to try to go doortodoor to to act like there's actual support for the guy and all the other stuff that they're doing.

And by the way, Charlie Kirk would be absolutely livid right now at the idea that his organization would be supporting John East Noo-Noo. Absolutely livid. I know Charlie Kirk. I worked with Charlie Kirk in New Hampshire in 2015. So what you're going to see is a big fake effort by people who are lying about the fact that he's a liberty guy to try to take Liberty votes. So Ed, so Ed's got his work cut out for him because there are some people that didn't apparently weren't involved in politics in 2012, don't understand what happened with Ron Paul, have no clue what's going on, and are buying an already failed narrative, or they know it, and they just want power, which is a

combination of both. But I'll I'll show you a couple of clips from these candidates in their own words so that you can get a sense for exactly what it is we're dealing with. I stood up against the Patriot Act when we were reauthorizing it and insisted that we add provision provisions to protect constitutional rights uh freedom of speech, access to lawyers, standards for uh warrants and the like. Uh it wasn't very popular. Obviously, I was taking a stand against one of President Bush uh Bush's signature items, but we won. We want changes

uh ensuring we have protections for constitutional rights under some of the really powerful surveillance powers we've given to the federal government. They're debating uh reauthorization what's called 702 warrantless uh surveillance right now. And I think if they had started working that on that a little bit earlier in a bipartisan fashion, they might have been able to secure enough votes uh from, you know, people who care about constitutional liberties like me. And >> you know, this is the problem with somebody like John East Noo-Noo. You know, he'll he'll go out, this is he's dangerous because he's smart enough to be able to manipulate people. He'll tell

you, well, I put in this stuff to make the bill better. We have no constitutional uh protections that came out of of the Patriot Act. I mean, the Patriot Act has been an unmititigated disaster. So, he puts in some show that means nothing and then votes for the bill and then acts like he's a civil libertarian and a hero. He voted for the final bill and what he put in was useless. Then he voted for for Real ID. Um, and then, and this is the reason that I, and I've said this several times, why I have no faith in this guy at all, because there was a time when I did, going back to 2007 time frame, you know, and I'm kind

of a political nerdy guy. I'd watch C-SPAN, C-SPAN 2, and, you know, people would talk about how Johnny Cenounu, um, it was, you know, one of the most libertarian things. They talk about all the stuff they talk about, oh MIT guy, libertarian and everything else. But we know what he's like when the chips are down. When there's an actual danger, when there's a crisis, he folds immediately. He voted against TARP, then the stock market collapsed, and then he voted for it and then became part of an oversight committee and then while elected was was a a chair of a uh committee, finance committee for the World Economic Forum with Claus Schwab. So when important things happen, this

guy fails. So when he says something, you can't believe it because he has a track record. You know, this guy is again I I the Cenounu family, they're smart, but they are not pro- freedom. They're pro the Cenounu family and they are pro um grifting off of Washington DC. And it's had a very negative effect on the health care system in New Hampshire, on the energy system in New Hampshire. And it's not just it's him, his brother, his father, the whole the whole thing. And you can look into it. And again, with AI, you have the power to do this. This is um now trackable. But this is the kind of stuff that he spins. I when I was when I had my campaign, I was I called him surveillance.

There are very few people that have voted for as many damning pieces of surveillance legislation as Johnny Cenounu. Of course, he while he's not elected right now, he did come out in support of both the Genius Act and the Clarity Act. The Clarity Act is the largest surveillance bill in US history, would track all of your transactions. They'll tokenize everything that you own. That will all be under surveillance and it's tied to the Patriot Act. So, he is not a civil libertarian. He is a massive uh supporter of the surveillance state, but he is a master manipulator of public opinion by being able to say things like this. Well, yeah, you know, it was bad, but I I put in some things to make it

better. The Patriot Act has been a disaster. What he put in was useless, and he voted for the final bill. Uh then we have Ed Lant uh who you know he's he's an auto mechanic, marine father, grandfather, and he is a strong believer in the United States Constitution. Um this is the kind of person that we actually need who's reflective of what New Hampshire is about. I only have a short clip from him, but here you go. >> This is my commitment to you. I owe it to you the people because it's we the people not we the party. >> I mean very strong message. I mean again this is a guy who who works for a living

and um you know has has his own uh auto repair place and actually has gotten involved with the school board, gotten involved with the community. Stenunu has was basically born with a silver spoon and you know his accomplishments have been voting for surveillance legislation and then turning his political connections into lobbying fees working for big pharma and uh you know one of the most parasitical uh lobbying firms in Washington DC. I mean, this is, you know, again, I I think I heard SN say, well, you know, I'm going to be the best there is at constituent services, you know, I mean, I mean, that's kind of saying, well, bidding is open, right? I mean, and

literally that's what his track record is. And so, this is an important one. And by the way, the other reason to vote for Ed, he's right on the issues. I mean, if you actually go through and look at where he stands on the Federal Reserve, the importance of the Constitution, the importance of of shooting down the surveillance state, but if Ed gets 4%, then the Constitution party will get ballot access in the next election, which means that people can run at all uh up and down the ballot. And you know, we have 400, you know, person uh state house, 24 person state senate. So, it's a big deal. And so I think it would send a very very strong message to get Ed to over 4%. I think that's a

worthy cause even if the margin isn't necessary. But I'm going to assume that the margin is necessary because this is a nepotistic family and that has strong roots. And Cenounu is so I mean he's clever in the sense I was driving around today and his his yard signs say uh Senator Cenounu or Cenounu Senator or something like this. But he strips off his name because he's trying to draft off of the popularity of his brother Chris Cenounu who was recently governor for multiple terms. Um, most a lot there are a lot of people that don't even know who he is. I I when I was running I had a lot of people say confused. Oh, that's the guy that was the governor. Uh, he's

drafting off of that. This is how this is how bad this is. And I would say in general, by the way, regardless of the political party, you would be better off if there is a chance to unseat a political dynasty. Do it. It is in the best interest of your state sovereignty and it is in the best interest of your freedom and individual rights. Which means, by the way, in New Hampshire, we have Stephanie Shaheen running for Congress. Vote against her. Um, you know, because the Sheen Shaheen are politically connected. The father, you know, runs a law firm, was the chair of Hillary Clinton's finance committee. Gene Shaheen was a US senator for a long period of time. The these people are

really entrenched. And what they do is they leverage their DC contacts uh in significant ways that screw up your state and and people just don't know how how it works. So then we have Texas. Again, the fact that Texas is a tossup state. Who would have thought Texas would be a toss-up state? But they have probably the worst possible candidate that they could they could have. They actually have uh the former or the AG who was uh who was impeached um in the House and the Senate didn't you know didn't ultimately convict him but this is you know mostly his own his own party and has run a an absolutely disastrous campaign and they keep you know sticking their their foot in their

mouths more and more every day. Um, and so, uh, he's wildly unpopular and the incumbent, John Cornin, uh, doesn't support him. There are a lot of establishment Republicans that don't support him. And I don't necessarily I've not been aligned with these establishment Republicans, but I'm not surprised that he's losing because he's got a lot of things, but actually the governor race, Abbott, who's been governor there for forever, that race is now becoming competitive. So, I'll show you a couple clips from Paxton. >> By proceeding with this illegal impeachment scheme to overturn a decision made by Texas voters just a few short months ago, the corrupt politicians in the Texas

House are demonstrating that blind loyalty to Speaker Dade Felin is more important than upholding their oath of office. They are determined to ignore the law. They have denied me the opportunity to present the evidence which contradicts their politically motivated narrative and they are showcasing their absolute contempt for the electoral process. >> Um let's see. [clears throat] Well, actually this is another >> every politician who supports this >> actually I'm going to move on from that. These are actually some of not even the there's another case where I guess uh you know his office uh gave a a a convicted multiple sex offender one day

sentence. Um I mean it just goes on and on and on. I mean this this guy is probably the worst candidate that they could possibly put up there. And so I think this race is really in play and right now the Democrat is actually uh wildly ahead. But we we're supporting Ted Brown uh who is a solid libertarian candidate u just absolutely uh consistent libertarian uh down the line on issues and last time he ran he got uh I believe over a quarter of a million votes. So I actually expect him to I see some a record-breaking performance here. And again, what is the [clears throat] I've I've been watching that because I'm involved in this, you know, focus groups and, you know, I'm talking to people in

each of these states and then I'm watching, you know, what's going on and and uh in particular in Texas, Republicans have lost the Hispanic vote in a massive way. I mean, it's just completely flipped. and and so um you know but so the issue with this is you know how do we get the word out about Ted Brown and I think that if um a lot of Republicans learned about Ted Brown they would absolutely vote for him. I mean, they don't necessarily want to vote for Terico, the other guy, who is a pretty extreme Dem, but there are many that are actually. I mean, this is the thing that I've been fascinated to see is how many Republicans are voting, they're willing to vote for extreme

leftist candidates uh in, you know, in Texas and in Michigan as well. And and there's a better way because you'll in my opinion, you'll regret that. Um you don't have to vote for the socialist candidate. You can show your dissatisfaction for Trump by voting for somebody who probably reflects closer to what your actual values are, which is the case with with Ted Brown, who is very much anti-surveillance state, won't raise taxes. Yeah, he got 267,000 votes uh last time. So, very proud to support Ted. And I'll show you a couple clips from Ted. I'm Ted Brown, a defender of the Constitution who is not beholdened to any special interest groups or corrupt

party leaders. I believe in personal freedom, economic freedom, digital privacy, limited government, and a peaceful anti-war foreign policy. >> All right, sounds good to me. And again, these issues, this war is wildly unpopular and the war is tied to people's economic uh constraints. And so, this is a big issue in Texas. I mean, you know, what's going on with the with the energy markets and Texas has also been hit massively by tariffs. So, I would love to see uh Ted hit uh some record-breaking numbers. And and so as I'm showing you these candidates, I'm going to show you a couple of ads, but uh as you know, I mean, I have I was trying to estimate, you [clears throat]

know, I've probably got about 4,000 hours that I've spent working on AI and building the AI systems that I use to the point where a lot of this stuff is is now automated. It's taken me a lot of trial and error, a lot of, you know, a lot of work. But um you know I do a lot of these music videos but but part of building that music video system is there's more capabilities that are built into it including the ability to do ads and including actually longer term the ability to do uh short documentaries and in the longer term uh movies and I can do this on my own hardware and it's uncensored. So, I literally have right now two dedicated computers that are doing

nothing but creating ads, 30 secondond ads for all of these races. So, this is just going on as we're talking right now. building a library of these ads and we have who our target markets are in each state um based on you know why they're you know unhappy with the Republicans and we're putting forward you know here's the issue with the Republican here's who our person is and we've already got the system locked and automated to even deliver the ads. So this is going to be um this is going to be unprecedented uh in terms of I I doubt anyone in the country has a system that is sophisticated as this and it's just I didn't build it for this intentionally I initially but I have

been using it for other things. I've been using it for advocacy. I've been using these music videos as a way to get information out about technocracy and to get information out about crypto prisoners. And so as I've refined and refined and refined and refined, I find myself in this position as we're doing this pack where I can just point uh these resources towards these political races and it's going to be quite quite the tool. I mean, if you were listening in at the beginning or if you're watching, you know, we already have anthems for each of the states and uh and now the ads are going to hit they're going to hit starting next Tuesday, but they're created and everything is

kind of locked and and ready to go. So, um, so that's what we have. I I'll show you an ad that we have, uh, for Texas, I believe. Let me let me see if I have a Texas ad. I'm going to have to load it up here real quick. Um, all right. Hopefully this is the right right one. Okay, here we go. There's a party line on the courthouse square. Everybody in it is holding their nose. 60 Texas House Republicans voted to impeach Ken Paxton. The Texas Senate acquitted him. A group that backed John

Cornin spent nearly $25 million against Paxton. In the primary and runoff, now the party wants your vote anyway. No, thank you. >> Ted Brown is on your ballot. [music] Libertarian. >> His website carries a warning. This candidate is not beholden to any special interest groups or corrupt party leaders. these running non-stop. I've put together a s, you know, kind of a

methodology for creating these things. And so they're just running. So when I wake up, I've, you know, I have, uh, you know, 40 or 50 new ads to screen, and I'm actually training the AI based on, right, like this, don't like this, edit this. Um, and so it's it's it's really been an amazing uh process actually building building this stuff out. So, um, so I'm looking forward to to that. You'll hopefully be able to see that. Uh, well, depending on where you are and if you're in the target market, you'll see it. One thing that I've noted, I mean, I put some of this stuff on my feed and this is maybe why my traffic is down because I have a audience that is, you know, probably

focused on technocracy, getting out of the system, cryptocurrency, whatever the different uh areas may be. And so, you know, obviously I'm I'm putting out posts about an Ohio election. It's not going to appeal to as many people. So, I'm not going to put as much of that stuff on my personal page just because it's not uh not relevant. I mean, I may put it up there if folks are interested, and I know a lot of libertarians follow, but but the real intent of this is to hyperarget these. And so, we're doing targeting through online uh services, through social media platforms, and and through streaming services uh as the way to to get the word out. So, then we have uh Kansas. So again, Kansas

hasn't voted for a Democrat for the United States Senate since the 1930s. And when I've dug into this, I just watched a debate between the Republican and the Democrat and they were just booing this Republican because um you know this guy's going on trying to talk about how the tariffs have helped people and everything else and people are like that. No, they they're losing jobs. The fuel costs are outrageous. and people just uh are absolutely not buying it. And so um here's Marshall, Roger Marshall, the incumbent. I'll show you a couple clips from him. >> Look, I think the biggest problem that this country faces is our $37 trillion

national debt that we're spending a trillion dollars a year on interest. >> I put that clip in there because I mean, look, listen, just look at the timing on this. Senate and voterama to formalize nine billion in Doge cuts. So, so first of all, this shows, you know, again, Doge was a horrible failure, not only in terms of cost savings, but it was a great acceleration in technocracy. But note, he's there talking about, you know, fiscal Republicans and fiscal conservatism. And this is from presumably uh 2025, right, after the inauguration. That's what would have been the time frame for this. and the debt was $37 trillion. It's $40 trillion today. It's it's at

they've added $3 trillion in debt just since he made this statement. And and so that, you know, I put that in there because that's why these guys are in trouble cuz they have a record. >> Yeah. Well, certainly Congress has a spending problem and we need to address that. Uh, but I think that that we want to be frugal with our money that I was taught to be frugal to be be uh concerned when it's other people's money, which is this is to take the very best care of it that I can. I don't care how much debt we're in or even if we had a surplus. I don't want to see waste and fraud like we've been seeing through USAID. I I do think that both parties need to do a better job of working

towards a balanced budget. Again, our national debt the biggest problem our country faces long term. So, you know, again, he's going on and on about the same point, and they we they've added $3 trillion since. I think that the idea I hope most people now have have understand that um the idea that Republicans are fiscally conservative does not match the record. And the worst periods of expanded uh spending that we've ever had are when Republicans have full control of the government. And when you look at deficits as well, deficits are much worse under complete Republican control. And this is despite that they have the rhetoric, the rhetoric does not match

the actual voting record in the slightest. So I mean, we back David Graham who is a solid libertarian uh who says politically I believe freedom is the highest value. in uh in 2022, he drew drew two 29,768 votes for the US Senate seat. And so we endorsed him last week. Um you know, I think he was originally pulling at like 2% or whatever. There was a poll yesterday that has him at 7%. This is now a razor thin race. If David Graham gets 7%, I guarantee you David Graham is the reason is is he's the kingmaker in this race. He is the

deciding factor. And watching the debate and watching people boo the Republican, I mean, if you're in Kansas and you're watching this, I encourage you to look at David Graham. Look at what he stands for. look at where he is on the issues because um certainly you already have your uh experience with Roger and we've seen he has a track record. These people have a track record. So so make your voice known. Show show the Republican party uh if you're a Republican and you don't like how things are going, show them that you you really want, you know, a libertarian or you want more libertarianism within the Republican party, but show, you know, express your um accountability and your intent by

voting for David Graham, who I have a couple of short clips. And eventually I said to myself, hey, uh that needs to be me. that needs to include me. So that's what inspired me to run is to get our ideas out there, possibly win and help save our country. Affordability is the hot, you know, buzzword nowadays. And uh I think affordability is important and people can get more affordability if we bring down prices by getting rid of laws and regulations. So, I'll show you, you know, a preliminary ad that we have uh for

Kansas >> Farm Report. Senator Roger Marshall, my numbers just go up or down with the price of gas. He says gas comes down if Iran gets wrapped up. In September, a vote to stop the Iran operation failed. Marshall voted no. make his numbers move. David Graham, libertarian. No war without an existential interest. This advertisement was generated in whole or substantially by artificial intelligence.

So there we have David Graham in Kansas. Um so I'm very excited to see how that's going to turn out. And um and now we have South Carolina. This is a uh a new endorsement as of today. Hey, I haven't even put out a press release on it or anything yet, but we're supporting Casey Whitner in South Carolina who is is running against Darlene Graham now. You know, [laughter] I I know [clears throat] if you're in the if you're a pro liberty person, you've been highly anti- Lindsey Graham for a long time and and no one was ever able to touch Lindsay. There have been there were some pretty big efforts and a lot of money spent. Uh, and this race, the prediction markets still have it,

you know, 70 to 80%, but the polls are actually pretty much neck and neck. And, uh, Casey is a very solid uh, candidate. I've watched some of her interviews, and she is going to be in one of the televised political debates next week. So, this is kind of a dark horse, but I actually believe that, you know, and typically a third party might get a couple of percent. if she gets 3% or 4% she might be uh the reason that you know we finally get the Grahams out of this seat and you know how horrible is it to take somebody like Lindsey Graham who was absolutely uh a wararmonger uh just sickening wararmonger who um absolutely would do

anything that he can any day of the week for for Israel and now they're they've handed you know the seat to his sister who has no political experience. This is not the kind of uh you don't ever want nepotism or these political dynasties, but but this is probably the, you know, the dumbest and worst form of it. So, I'll show you a couple clips from Darlene and then I'll show you a a clip or two from Casey. >> You have both voted against a war powers resolution uh containing the president. So, what does victory look like? What is a win for you when it comes to Iran? You know, I fully trust President Trump when it comes to the war in Iran. Uh 47 years this has been going on. Iran is the

weakest they have been in 47 years. The one thing that concerns me is we cannot let them get a nuclear weapon. So, I trust President Trump and everything he's doing. Um I I think he's got this and I trust him on it. I'm not a polished politician up here. I national security is not my thing, not my area of expertise, but I do support the military. >> I mean, again, you know, is this what we want? People who, you know, their stance is, well, I don't know much about this. I I but I trust the president. Well, I'll tell you what, at 39% or 31% approval, not many people trust the

president. And people do not trust the [clears throat] president right now at all uh on this Iran issue which has been a disaster which he said was only going to take a couple of weeks and now we're at whatever it is month seven um with no end in sight. So, we will turn it over now uh to Casey and show some of her issues where one of the areas that I've noticed that she's particularly focused on is the national debt, which would be great if if good luck finding a Republican that has any interest in actually doing something about that. >> I'm running for US Senate to give South Carolina independent, [music] accessible representation. I am addressing a critical national security

threat, the national debt. >> The two most corrupt corporations in this country are the ones running it. Their product is government. >> So that's uh pretty pretty straightforward. And that this is a very new commercial since we just >> 49 to 50. Twice a measure to pull US forces out of the Iran war lost by one vote. Darlene Graham voted no. National security is not my thing, not my area of expertise, but I do support the military. On August 11th, two out of three Republican primary voters picked someone else. Casey Whitner, is it time to end

the war in Iran? Yes. >> She's got one vote. I've got one, too. >> Casey Whitner, US Senate, November 3rd, >> Farm Report. So, there we have our pick for South Carolina. Next we have Ohio where it's off instead. So as goes Ohio, so goes the nation. And Ohio is uh I'm particularly excited about what's going on in Ohio for several reasons. Now I mean I had um Craig Winklewitz on here and we had this

episode about technocracy in Ohio, specifically in Ohio. And the episode did well, but but actually the posts coming from the episode, the summaries of it went absolutely viral and it stimulated a conversation that ended up having one of the guminatorial candidates. It had um uh the CEO of Androl, a whole bunch of people in there talking about this and and for for weeks and weeks I was hearing from people in Ohio that were stunned or some that weren't surprised about what's going in Ohio. And and Ohio is one of the major destination sites for data centers. And they are the kind of data centers, data centers are not inherently bad, but the kind of data centers that are uh being that are put

in through tax subsidies, which is what happened actually under Governor Kasich, like the just massive billion dollar subsidies that no one knew about until recently. And it turned out that one of the areas that New Albany, where uh a lot of these data centers are are based, is New Albany is a company town owned by Les Wexner. Less Wexner was one of the main funding sources for Jeffrey Epste. And at one point, Jeffrey Epstein was actually the president of the New Albany uh company town. And so as we went through there, the surveillance is awful. drones systems where people are rewarded for niche snitching on their neighbors through a mobile app. I mean,

it was I when we were putting together the episode, I was actually I was so stunned about how comprehensive the surveillance state is in Ohio, license plate readers, just so on and so forth, that that's what prompted me to actually redevelop the technocracy atlas and do this focus on all of the states and all of the countries and give people reports and to show a map of how technocracy is growing on a state-by-state and country bycountry basis. since 1973 projected out through uh 2030. So learning about Ohio is part of it. And what I love about what's happening is VC is now down in the polls as well. And VC, these guys, VC, JD Vance, Peter Teal, who again was the reason JD Vance w was the

senator there. This seat is the seat that was vacated by JD Vance. So the Republican that's there right now was appointed to this position. custed and so now he's actually up for the first time for election and so a loss for VC and a loss for the Republican here is a big statement against technocracy and Trump and the polling on this and by the way the Democrats horrible I I the I do not like shared Brown either but at the same time this is a strategic uh vote against technocracy there are so many people that have been bamboozled by the idea that VVC and these other people are, you know, free market capitalists

that are promoting innovation. They're technocrats that are using the state and subsidies to pursue a personal agenda that happens to be based on, you know, technology related companies. And so I was fascinated to learn that that based on the polling, opposition to data centers is one of the hot issues, if not the hot issue. And so what did Trump do? Trump went, he's doing his tour, tonedeaf tour. I think there's going to be a point where people just say, "Listen, Trump, don't come here. You're not helping." Because he actually flew out to Ohio and told the people in the audience that if they don't like data centers or accept data centers, they're going to they're dumb and poor. They'll

be dumb and poor. Like, it's just it's unbelievable to see what's going on there. So, uh so we're supporting uh Bill Red Path here. And you know, I believe this is the race where there there hasn't even there there's not a lot of polling because there hasn't been a a third party since like 2014 or something. Uh so I I think and again as I've been doing these media interviews, some of them are going to come out next week. Um uh this strategy that we're deploying here is incredibly powerful and incredibly effective. And when you see a lot of the polling, you'll note that they omit. I remember this firsthand because after 2016 when it was clear that we were the

margin. Uh I went back to Larry Sabadau and some of the polling places that didn't include me in the polling and because I I approached them beforehand. I said you should pull on this. This is a big thing. Most of the pollsters got it wrong. Most of the pollsters because there hasn't been a third party aren't even uh recording the polling information. So I believe Bill Red path is going to be uh the margin of difference here. Although it's, you know, the Democrat is gaining so much momentum because of the data center issue, it might not end up being the margin because it ends up being an even bigger blowout. I mean, it is it is looking like at this point it really truly could be

a wave, but Bill Bill Red Path has voted or excuse me, not Bill Red Path. Uh John Hustid has voted wrong on every issue. He's been a lock step, you know, uh voted for voted for war, voted for all of the big spending and everything else. And so, it's pretty easy to attack any of these guys because they have a record. Look, I mean, think about it. the big beautiful bill. Like what I I have a hard time finding I mean people that are trying to cope or whatever and justify this they're actually kind of out of ammo at this point. There really isn't anything to point to. I mean at some point you know one of the things that a lot of people held on to was well hey in his first term he didn't get us

in any new wars and he said he wasn't going to get us in any new wars and so that that was enough. Now he doesn't even have that. And so, um, so I I actually believe Ohio is going to flip. Here are a couple clips from, uh, Houston. >> So, I I'll just say this. I know there's a lot of noise around this, and this is all true. You hear all of these names and all of these people that say they want to run for governor and say they want to be the senator. And I'll promise you this, every single one of them would have accepted this appointment to the US Senate except Governor offered it to me. We don't want Iran to have a nuclear weapon and we don't want them to control

the straight of Hormuz. If Iran has a nuclear weapon and they control the straight of Hormuz, if you think gas prices are high now, they'll be even higher if that happens. So, we got to bring the war to a close to get gas prices down, but we have to do it on terms that are acceptable to the United States of America and the people that live here. So, I mean, Bill Redpath is a solid libertarian. Um, you know, only re-elect politicians who consistently vote for less spending. He calls for ending all corporate welfare and eliminating the education department and HUD. So, you know, this is this is my kind of guy. I have a couple of clips from from Bill. I am running for the United States

Senate because the people of Ohio deserve a candidate who will work consistently for economic freedom and personal freedom, not just for Ohioans, but for all Americans. I want to eliminate several cabinet departments, including the Department of Education and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. [music] There's no need for those, and those are easy cuts to be made. Uh so here's here's the uh a preliminary commercial that we have uh in Ohio >> to Houston. [music] >> 14 times John Houston said no to ending the war. It failed by one. 49 to 50.

>> By one. >> There's a line on [music] the ballot out of Parisburg. Bill Red Bath, Libertarian, less spending, [music] lower taxes, real respect for civil liberties. It failed by one. You have one. Tuesday, November 3rd. So again, you know, it's I'm I'm very glad to see how unpopular this war is. If you had listened to Trump and, you know, you looked at the news or whatever, you'd think that there was a

lot more support for this war than there is. There really is not. The war is absolutely hated. Um I I think one of the reasons it's hated is is frank frankly more directly gas prices since this is something that you know it's not the war is not happening here so it's kind of out of sight out of mind but um this really this may turn out to be one of the most powerful issues and almost all of these candidates are on the wrong side of in fact all of them are on the wrong side of the [clears throat] Iran war. So then we have Iowa um where the incumbent is Ashley Hinsson and you know she has some issues on war. She also voted for tax credits for a

pipeline there in Iowa that's that's very unpopular. So I'll show you a couple clips from her. >> Uh also as a mom I think about uh the men and women who are fighting. Right. I have a 15-year-old and 13-year-old boy. I don't want this to be a forever war. So, I want to make sure we do everything we can. I trust in our US military, the greatest fighting force in the world to bring this to a close as quickly as possible. Uh, cuz I know people are getting squeezed. >> So, why vote against the resolution? >> I don't think we need another resolution. And I certainly don't want to see the president not be able to do a orderly end to this war. >> And I worked very hard listening to you

because I heard one big thing. You wanted lower taxes and less government. So, we delivered no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, reduce taxes for social security, directly targeted at the middle class because it's not the government's money, it's your money. So, we back Thomas Lane uh also a libertarian. He is a Green County attorney and um he has been uh strongly against this uh use of eminent domain and some of these tax credits there in the issue. And so he's actually been a leader on this issue. So I mean I quote from him, I'm not running against a Democrat or Republican. I'm running against the two-party system itself. And

again, no, nobody thought Iowa would be in play, but this he's a solid guy. I'll show you a couple of his clips. I thought if there is anything Ians could rally around, we would want to protect our agricultural land from eminent domain by private companies for private gain. I believe that the people of Iowa are ready to vote for someone rather than [music] against someone. and I believe I can be that person. >> So based on the polling that we're seeing right now, I I firmly believe that uh Thomas Lane will end up being the margin in that race as well. And again, you know, he stands for the right things. He's actually got a track record. He is a county attorney, very

energetic, so forth. It's just a question of getting the word out about these candidates and these c if you are a third party candidate [clears throat] chances are you don't have money and you know part of it is like my experience in New Hampshire you've got to spend your you know time and effort just to get on the ballot and then you have to you know this is assuming you don't have to fight it legally and then you're not eligible for the debates and so and if you're running on a party that doesn't have ballot access the party probably doesn't have resources and so it's very difficult to raise money so one of The benefits of this super PAC is we're able to

provide awareness about these candidates that the candidates uh can't provide on their own. And so, but one thing that I want to say is I I' I've never talked to or met most of these candidates. I've never spoken with him directly and I can't I'm I'm forbidden from doing so uh because we uh because we were running the pack and that's one of the rules of of running the pack. Um, so let me see if I have an Iowa video here. Since 2019, Summit's founder and its CEO put 28,500

into Ashley Henson's campaign. She voted for the one big, beautiful bill. It kept the carbon capture tax credit. In 2022, Thomas Lane read his county's letter against pipeline eminent domain. The board voted yes. They count on you having nowhere else to go. Said like the road lane on your ballot. So, we're getting near the end on this. Now, we have Mike Rogers

who's running again for US Senate. He ran last time lost by I want to say 41,000 votes or 19 I think he lost by 19,000 votes. And the third party candidate got uh 41,000 votes. So he is already aware of the fact that the third party and the libertarian can serve as the margin of difference. But this guy is an absolute establishment candidate. I believe he was involved with the FBI. He's been on these uh intelligence committees. He's for all of the surveillance legislation. I believe it was for Genius Act. He was for the Clarity Act. and he's one of these guys who was really anti-crypto but then all

of a sudden decided he was going to become pro crypto but doesn't understand crypto. Um and so [clears throat] again just an absolute establishment hack but he's running against a a liberal uh candidate a Muslim candidate that people thought was going to be too extreme. And it doesn't look like that's the case. In fact, it looks like his opponent is uh is is really starting to even gain more momentum. Now, I used to live in Michigan and I had family in Michigan and so I mean, I know going back, you know, 40 years, the Dearbornne, Michigan area was a huge concentration uh of of of Muslims and that apparently has has expanded, but that doesn't seem

to be a deterrent here at all. So, this is this is going to be a very interesting race. Now in this race we are there is a libertarian as well. So I think the the margin might be split a couple of different ways here. Uh the libertarian in this instance was a little bit more leftleaning um for my liking. So we are supporting a guy by the name of Tim Long who is with the National Taxpayers Party which which was named the Constitution Party but it's essentially the same. The guy is a a pro constitution pro limited government uh person. So, I'll show you a couple clips from um from Mike and then a very short clip from from Tim Long. >> Have Have 12 years gone by and our

memories faded so badly we forgot what happened on September 11th? This bill turns off a very specific program. It doesn't stop so-called spying and other things that this has been alleged to do because that's not what h is not what's happening. It's not a surveillance bill. It's not monitoring. Doesn't do any of those things. So that was him um on the you know as the intelligence committee chairman uh trying to shoot down a a bill uh an amendment from Justin Amash. And so this gives you where and Amos is from Michigan. So this gives you a sense of where where Rogers is. Um, and I and I I would argue that maybe the fact that we haven't had any complaints come forward

with any specivity specificity arguing that their privacy has been violated clearly indicates in 10 years clearly indicates that something must be doing right. Somebody must be doing something exactly right. >> But who would be complaining? >> Somebody who's privacy was violated. You can't have your privacy violated if you don't know your privacy is violated. >> I disagree with that. Right. K. So again, massive surveillance state guy, massive establishment guy, and so there's no, you know, nothing lost by by having his defeat. This is not the kind of person if you're going to send a message to the Republicans that, you know, hey, you guys failed on everything

you said you were going to do. You expanded the surveillance state. You went to war. You screwed up the economy. This is I if if you lose this guy, uh, no one's going to cry over that. This is exactly the kind of person the Republicans should be pruning from their ranks, not habitually supporting. So, you know, so Tim Long, um, yeah, again, US taxpayer party, uh, and, you know, he drew 6,500 votes for Wayne County Commissioner, so or Wayne County Commission. So, he's gotten some votes. He's run in some some local races, um, but he's not running a a particularly aggressive campaign. And I'll show you the short video from from him. >> God led me to the US Constitution Party.

I'm running for US Senate. I don't want your donation. I don't need your donation because guess what? God provides. >> So there you go. That's uh that his hopefully he won't be too offended by the fact that we're supporting his uh his campaign, but uh he's very clear on where where he is on on the issues. So, we're we're happy to support Tim and think that he'll have a big impact uh in this race. Uh let me pull up the Michigan ad. >> Somebody's always keeping track. Michigan's own Justin Amos tried to stop the NSA keeping your phone records. Mike Rogers voted no.

Out here, everybody knows your sign. Not in here. Last time, Mike Rogers lost by 19,06 votes. Nobody has to know. Another choice. Tim Long, US taxpayers, Taylor, Michigan. Look for Long. This advertisement was generated in whole or substantially by artificial intelligence. I never thought I'd be doing a an episode where I'm showing a bunch of political ads that I made for states that I don't live in, but nevertheless, uh, here we are. So, you always get something new here on the Aarend Day Show. Um, so, so those are our

candidates. That's our roster. And when you look at the overall map, uh I I truly believe that uh come November 4th, when [clears throat] all of this is counted, our candidates, some combination of them are going to end up being the margin that flips the Senate and and Stark Freedom's participation is going to increase the turnout and the support for these candidates in a way where it actually makes a material difference that will be measurable in terms of the overall balance of power in the United States Senate. [clears throat] And so this is, you know, again, this is where where we started. Um, at the beginning of this, uh, the Republicans now, um, 53 45 with, uh, two

independents who caucus with the Democrats, uh, Bernie Sanders and King, Angus King. So, that's where we are. And you know, when I started, when I even looked at running for the race, I I thought it would come down to being 50/50. I just had a sense that it would be that would be closer, but um the way things are going now, you look at these races. And this is kind of a this is a summary of where we are. And if you go to starkfreedom.org, I I keep a real time update of what's going on with the polling. So this map that you see with, you know, are our candidates currently, the margin, and how's it trending and everything, I keep that updated. That's kind of an

automated situation. But if you look at these right now in in Texas, um, aggregate of the polls, it's considered a tossup. The Democrats up by two. Ted Brown is pulling at 3.7%. So he is the margin of difference there. Particularly if you assume he's primarily pulling from Republicans. and with his messaging, you particularly when you see the the Democrat, he would certainly be pulling from Republicans uh either exclusively or mostly. Uh Kansas right now has the Republican up by 0.02%. And uh in the aggregate of polls, David Graham is has 3%. So he covers the gap. He is the margin. And in fact, as I

said, most recently, he's at 7%. In Iowa, the Republican is pulling right now up.3. Thomas Lane is pulling at 2.6%. And again, you know, I got 2.4% whatever it happened to be. But, but you know, remember spending spending no money. So, so a little money goes a substantial way to get, you know, Thomas Lane from 2.6 six to three three to three and a half% is extremely doable in the conditions that we're in right now with the dissatisfaction with Trump. So, we're going to be very strategic, very targeted with our messaging. Ohio, Bill Red Path right now, the Democrats up two points and you know, our

candidate is at 2.4% Bill Red Path. So, you know, and I'm telling you right now that when this is over with, people are going to be looking at the news story saying, "Oh, how did we miss this? How did we miss that these guys were were the margin?" Because there's going to be an overall story and because we usually do not have Yeah, we're generally a 50/50 uh country, but you know, Kansas is usually not 50/50. Texas is usually not 50/50. South Carolina is not 50/50. So, these are races that have never been in play before. And when I ran in 2016, I knew it was going to be a close race, but that year it was the closest race in

the country, which it usually isn't that close. So, we're looking at a scenario here where many of these races are close and in some cases like in Ohio with Bill Red Path where there hasn't even been a third party on the ballot for well over a decade. So people are not factoring this in. Pollsters are not truly factoring this in and I think it's going to be the surprise story of the entire election. I think people are going to be talking about it all over the country when this happens. Michigan right now uh the Democrat is up 3.1. Our guys pulling at.5 because again there's also there's also a libertarian in the race. I mean, I guess, you know, to be honest about it, I, you know, there's a

theory that the libertarian is going to pull more from the left. I actually don't think that that's even the case. I mean, just based on the candidates's positions, I actually think the candidate still is going to pull more from the right, just just as a matter of of course as a as a libertarian. Um, but nevertheless, not not quite covering the gap yet. In New Hampshire, Edund Llant right now is is pulling at two. And again, I, you know, as I said before I did this, you know, before I formed the pack, um, you know, I, you know, I was pulling at 4% in Ras Muen and he was pulling at two. So, if the supporters, if a significant percentage of the people that were supporting me uh,

support Ed Lelant, then that that actually will move him up [clears throat] quite a bit. But nevertheless, right now, based on the aggregate polls, Cenoun is down 6.6. So, um I again I project that that race will tighten just because I know Miriam add a bunch of other uh you know people are are uh selling their souls and telling a not true story about Cenounu. So they're trying to push that number closer. So, I think that number will get closer and I think Ed very well if Ed ends up getting four based on where I see this I could see this being a three two to three point race and I could see Ed getting 4% and I think it's important for Ed to get 4% again because it would give the

Constitution party ballot access. So, look to this race to be closer than we think and for Ed to be a big determining factor in it. And then South Carolina, again, this was a late ad. Uh, who know, we might, there's another race that I'm looking at. I won't say what it is now, but there may be another race that we join, uh, depending on how this holds. And it's easy enough and fast enough for me to pivot and add a new state. Um, but South Carolina right now, the Republican is only up.9%. I mean, again, mind-boggling that this is the case in South Carolina, which is usually solidly red. And so, uh, Casey is polling at at 2.1% and there's only one poll so far, but I

I'll tell you she's going to be in this debate next week and from what I've seen watching her interviews and interviewing, I think she's going to do incredibly well. So, I I expect those numbers to to increase as well. And I think that could be one of the shocking stories is that uh Lindsey Graham's sister um gets knocked out because of of the libertarian. So again, this is kind of a chart of of you know what is the typical third party out of the how does the third party typically pull in these races and then how are our candidates doing now. in Texas in the past on average about 2%. Uh TED is is at 3.7%.

Um and Kansas in the past, Kansas actually has been fairly uh high. You know, the third party candidates average around 4%. So he's at at 3% now, but again, the most recent poll uh 7% 5%. So, um, David Graham is is his numbers are are are are jumping and and again, this Republican is very unpopular this debate. I mean, the guy was booed the entire the entire time on on every issue. I guess he had some issues. He was a doctor and um he sent a bunch of his patients to collections. He's an OBGYn. Sent a bunch of his patients to collections and I guess allegedly 81 of his patients were arrested. So, this guy's got a bad PR problem because he

was like a an OBGN in a rural part of uh of Kansas. And so, one of the the music video that we did kind of kind of talks about this big backlash uh on this for him. Um in Iowa, typically about 2%. Uh Thomas Lane, who I think is a very strong uh candidate, very energetic candidate, and again, as a county attorney, he's at 2.6% right now. Ohio. No libertarian on the Senate ballot from, you know, 2014 to 2022. Um, and so now he's pulling at 2.4. So that could end up being uh an even bigger bigger number. We should see if we can get Afroman to come out and uh and endorse him. That would be that would be great. But I I actually bet I think I think Bill will probably do even

even better because people really I mean you saw the smug Republican. I mean, he was appointed to this position and was, you know, basically rubbing it in everyone's face and then he's just been a horrible vote and, you know, he's he's got the kind of, you know, he's the kind of person that is not hard for people to not like based on his personality. Michigan third party candidate gets typically gets two. Our guy's pulling at.5, but there's also a libertarian. So, um, it'll be interesting to see how Tim does. I Tim again will pull more from Republicans. I mean, obviously, you saw his message. His message is just strongly constitution, God, so forth. Like, he's he's pulling directly from

what would otherwise be Rogers uh voters. New Hampshire is typically about 2%. Again, you know, I did better than this. And in fact, in in 2016, I was on the ballot. There was also a Libertarian on the ballot. And between, you know, the two of us, we got 4 2% 4.3%. Uh it really has dropped since then. Um there was a you know a candidate that did very poorly in 2022. Um I mean historically really badly and and so since then they haven't uh they haven't had anyone run for US US Senate. So I actually think that um [clears throat] if you look at again I was at 4% eds at 2. Um, you put those two together, I mean, there's there's the

potential for 6% plus um, in this race. So, I I believe that Ed will will outperform uh, the 2% uh, by uh, hopefully a good bit and in fact hopefully we'll get over that 4% number and be and be the difference. People don't like people who know Cenounu, people who are paying attention, you know, Sunnu did really well in the primaries because the people that vote in Republican primaries, um, they they're not there's not a lot of thought that goes into it. It's hardcore establishment. It's low turnout. Um, I mean, Scott Brown was in that race. was like 7525 or whatever which was bizarre because Chris Cenounu actually or excuse me um Scott Brown has outperformed

uh any of the other US Senate candidates when he ran against uh Gene Shaheen in in 2014. So the fact that he did that poorly literally was coasting on name recognition but in a primary that had zero enthusiasm and very low turnout. So, um I so I think Ed's going to turn out to be a big factor there if we can get the word out, if people can be made aware of the fact that he's in the race and and what he stands for. But what he stands for uh is is completely compatible with the live free or die ethos. And you know, Sunnu, neither Snoon nor Papis really fit the bill there. And then South Carolina, typically 2% is where the candidate shows up. Um,

only been one poll. Um, and Casey's at 2.1%, but again, I've watched her and she's solid. And I think the fact that she's in the debate and because of the dynamics, I wouldn't be surprised if she doesn't end up getting three or 4%. As well, so this this is going to be the story. This is big. And you know, I know it's, you know, probably not the most popular for me to walk through a whole bunch of races and states that you probably don't live in and walk through this stuff, but the reason it's important for you to understand is if this works the way that I think it's going to work. This is a major tool. This pack is a major tool that could be used for obstruction. And not just

federally, we could actually start targeting state governments. This is a way that you can actually start to get out some of those incumbents that squeak by every year that everybody hates. This is a this is a tool to do that and it's a way to do it that's really efficient and really really costeffective. And so if what can come out of this is the story. I mean, if we end up, you know, again, there's going to be a lot of press before the election, but if this works the way that I think it's going to do, this is going to be a major story that I hope gets into the minds of the public, which is that you don't have to shut up and vote. You don't have to just pick from the two-party system. uh

you can, you know, vote the way you actually want to vote, not the way somebody tells you you need to strategically or the way that you always have because we're in we have $40 trillion worth of debt. The dollar has lost almost 50% or 40% of its purchasing power just since 2020. We're in multiple wars around the world. We are in a state of peak corruption in terms of, you know, not only the Epstein files, the Trump administration and Trump himself. I I actually will say this, I believe Trump is the most corrupt president we've ever had. And when you look at his crypto stuff, you look at a whole variety of his business dealings, the way his sons are uh owning

significant portions of companies that are getting defense contracts. I believe Trump's own net worth has tripled in this second term. I mean, you know, this is if he wasn't a billionaire before because, you know, there's all the debate about his tax returns. He is now. And a lot of it is due to stuff that is possibly illegal. And if it's not illegal, it's definitely immoral. Um, so this is uh this is a pretty unique uh set of of circumstances where yeah, you know, you don't have to vote for that and you don't have to vote for the Democrat. You don't have to make that choice. You can, but you can send a message and the outcome that you get is you get gridlock. You slow

technocracy. You slow spending. You end up with ridiculous WWE style cage match debates on the congressional floor and nothing gets done. And you know what? That is better for all of us. And that gives us time to realize this whole thing is rigged. The government is rigged. The economy is rigged. We are living in a state of complete cronyism that is morphing into a complete technocratic digital prison. and let's get these guys fighting against each other instead of them getting us fighting amongst ourselves so that we can focus our energy on building better systems and a better future. And so this is this is why I really hope people

listen to this. Um, you know, sadly often when I do stuff like this, people don't believe me when I say it's going to happen and then it happens and they get pissed off at me that it happened. Like, oh, did you know this was the outcome? Yeah, I told you that the that was the outcome. When I did this in 2016, I gave people a year's I was I was in on Ben Swan uh Truth and Media interviewed me and I said I am doing this and it it will cost the Republicans the control of the United States Senate which it effectively did from 2020 to 2022 with AI being out. It ended up being um 50/50 and I was in Breitbart stating that they said look this is what I'm going to do.

I'm sitting here right now telling you I'm going to use and support using a super PAC highquality third-party candidates that are anti-war and pro-lited government and they are going to be the margin of difference that's going to cost the Republicans the United States Senate and in so doing is going to obstruct government so that we can um exit and build better alternatives and at the same time send a message to the two parties system that there's a new strategy here where we're going to take away your power and your ability to say when you get elected and don't do any of the things that you say you're going to do, we're not going to give you another

chance. And it doesn't mean we like the other side. We're going to we're going to say you're out. Here's a vote of no confidence. we're going to go to gridlock and then maybe this the the parties will actually get the message that they can't just rely on people blindly voting uh for the party and fall for it again and again and again and not do what you say you're going to do and not be held accountable. And the beauty of this strategy is it doesn't require I don't have you know you might sit and think about this. Yeah. The voters Yeah. I have I've done podcasts on here where I've said part of the problem with our political system is that the people don't understand how

government works. Twothirds of Americans can't identify the three branches of government like basic level understanding. If you go from you know the qualifications that what were required to vote at the founding I mean the whole basis of this country was on having an informed citizenry. We do not have an informed citizenry. We have no to lowinformation voters. That is a fact. It's a measurable fact. So, I'm not sitting here telling you, "Oh, yeah, this is a great idea. I'm going to get 50%." I need to get three or 4%. In fact, I don't even need to get that. I need to take the quality candidates that we have and help them get exposure so that they can add another one half of a percent to 2%.

Well, that's not hard to do when the president is universally hated. Nobody can afford things and we're in wars that we were told we were never going to be in. I'm not saying that this strategy would work under all circumstances. I mean, it wouldn't work if, you know, we happened to have a strong economy, weren't at war, and we had a party that did what they said they were going to do. This strategy wouldn't be needed. But, I mean, let's be realistic about it. When was the last time uh we we ever had that? at at best we've we we've had waves where it goes back and forth and then every time we vote in you know one party to have control over all the branches of government whatever it is

it's the worst. I mean I keep on saying as bad as it is right now Trump's first 2020 was horrible. We printed more money and he printed more money in his first term than we printed from the inception of the country up until that time. We added more. I think we had a what was it? Seven and a half trillion dollars worth of debt in one term. This is Republican, right? Um it hasn't gotten better. It doesn't matter what the outcome is, but the worst outcome is single party rule. So look, this is a this is a big opportunity and and it's an opportunity that if this works just like the legal strategy, if I can beat the AG, if other people can start winning against the government and

winning against, you know, block cameras and other things. There are 519,000 people holding elected office in the United States. 90,000 local government Um, last year 58 races where a minor party candidate got more votes than the winner's margin. And again, this this this year is going to be a lot different. The local stuff, disregard that because I actually didn't get a full analysis obviously of [clears throat] all of the races across the country. But in 2024, there were 12 races where this was the case. Seven in the Senate, five in the House. And this was non-strategic, right? The I

mean these were races where um this the these were races where nobody was paying attention to this strategy. This just happened to be the outcome. No one was consciously saying, "Okay, well, we're going to support these types of candidates to do this specific thing and we're going to put some money and awareness around it." There were 77 of these races in 2020. I think this is going to be a record year. this will turn out to be a record year uh for this at the federal level just because of how how contested it is. And we're going from a state where again where Republicans have complete control and these races are are are toss-ups, but the momentum is all going the other way.

And so this what I'm talking about this pack, this strategy is that momentum that just pushes it over the top. And again, I've I've I've done this myself. did this in 2016, got almost 18,000 votes and lost by a thousand. My votes were mostly Republicans because there was a libertarian in the race. This is known. People try to refute this, but you know, I've got pictures of elected Republican officials holding a ballot for me. Um, and so, and we were the margin of difference as well for both congressional districts. So, this is uh so this is real. this is this I I believe people are going to be talking about this and so anyway um

[clears throat] I hope you can uh support you know in either way do you share the content tell people in these states if you know people in these states that this is going on I will be raising money for this not yet um you know wait I actually do have to get a bank account for this is the one thing I dislike about this is I actually have to get a bank account based on the laws for packs so I will have that set up uh tomorrow uh and you'll be able to donate. We'll do a big fundraising effort for this. But you know, the the reason that I'm able to do this is, you know, because candidates can't raise money. But I I did a super PAC in in 2014. And I'd never done a

super PAC before. I raised $228,000 and, you know, like basically 72 hours. And then I stopped raising more money because we didn't actually have the capacity to deploy the money because we had, you know, we had to put the money that we did have to use and we actually just didn't have have the ability. This is like before AI and a variety of other things. But there are a lot of people that want to fund this. There are a lot of people that want the Republicans to lose control. And then within each of the states, there are different people with different motivations for wanting to influence the outcome of this. And so if you know if I'm a libertarian and I'm

going out and I'm just trying to raise money as a libertarian, it's really difficult. But if I'm going out raising the money strategically and I'm saying, "Hey, g guess what? We this is the leverage that is going to tip the balance of power." There are a lot of people that will fund that. There are libertarians that will fund that. There are Democrats that are fun that fund that and there are disaffected Republicans that will fund that. The thing that you're going to find at the end of this, just like when I raised money in 2014, I had an unlikely group of people that do not like each other that were uh funders of this. You're going to see people that fund this that

are uh that that would never normally be together in any kind of context or any situation. Uh but they'll do it because I have a track record of doing this. I if I say I'm going to do this, um I I've shown that I will follow through with it and that it will be effective. Now, un unlike 2014 where I didn't have a problem raising money, I I now have a long track record of doing this and we have a a credible plan. So, uh more to come on that and um you can join the Stark Freedom Pack Street team as well on Facebook. So, this is kind of an organic group uh to help share some of the materials. Uh, you know, I'm hoping some of these songs and some of these videos actually go viral. I'm This is

why I'm doing a lot of testing and and playing around with this, but some of the some of the stuff might go viral. You never know. Some of the music videos that I've done have gone viral. I mean, I the the um the Irish kind of drinking song that I have on about Howard Lutnik. Uh, that one absolutely went viral. Tucker Carlson's brother retweeted it. I mean, that thing has gone all over the place. Um, and so, you know, you never know which one is going to is going to catch, but there's I will tell you there's an unlimited amount of material. I did a song on about the Michigan race and, you know, the story is just about the fact that this guy Mike Rogers, the

surveillance guy, was telling this story that, you know, he worked on the manufacturing line in 1981 making a, you know, Chrysler Sebring. Well, the Chrysler Sebring did or excuse me, a a a Chrysler um I can't even remember what he said it was. He got but he got the car the car wrong. Um Oh, no. He said he worked on the Sebring in 1981 and the Sebring wasn't even released until 1995. So, it's just something as simple as the politician misrepresenting or lying outright, I don't know which, uh that he had this kind of job. you know, if you're in Michigan, which is a big automotive state, trying to act like, you know, he had more street cred than he actually did and made a massive goof

up, that kind of stuff goes viral. So, so our song about that is just it's just about that. the fact that this guy, you know, lied about working uh uh working on the line on this particular Chrysler or the um the one we have in Kansas talks about uh Roger Marshall and the fact that um you know he sent collections agencies after all of his OBGYn patients and so um so some of these are the Republicans have really bad candidates literally in all of these races. I mean, there's not a situation where it's like I'm looking at this thing. It's not it's not like we're going after a Thomas Massie type or a Rand Paul type, right? I mean, the whole point of this

strategy, by the way, is to be strategic about it. It's not to just run people as third parties for the sake of running people as third parties. There's a pairing here. It's a shitty Republican who voted for war, voted for increased spending, supported Trump's agenda, which he lied about, versus a solid libertarian constitutional candidate. Um, who is who are and they're all for limited government and they're all for supporting the Constitution. So, it's a clear case. Like, I'm not losing any sleep on oh, oh my god, we're going to cost this great guy. I can't find anything uh worth supporting with these Republican candidates. They're all just NPCs locked into uh that got locked into

the Trump agenda and now voted that way and now have to suffer the consequences and need to be held accountable for that. So, with that said, um I'm going to wrap it up tonight. I encourage you to go to starkfreedom.org. I encourage you to share this. Uh again, small attendance tonight, but I also didn't send it to as many people. Usually when I do this, I kind of market it to groups and everything, but I'm not, you know, I'm not going to send a, you know, politically oriented uh talk to crypto groups and some of the other stuff. I don't want to kind of spam people or piss people off. But nevertheless, if there is something here that you like, and I do do I do encourage you, if you

are one of my normal listeners, and you heard me talk about how there's no way to vote, you can't vote our way out to think about what I'm saying here though strategically and how this is this is different. This is about obstruction. We need to expose, obstruct, exit, and build. We need to do all of those things. And if we do all of those things, uh, I think we've actually got a real chance. I'm I'm actually pretty excited about this. I'm optimistic about this. I'm also optimistic about the ability to use AI in courts. So, it was looking pretty bad there for a while, but there are some we can use their tools against them and we can use our tools to gum up their bureaucracy and

that's kind of what we need to do. Um, so with that said, I'm going to wrap it up tonight. I don't have time for Q&A. Unfortunately, I've got some other stuff that I've got to do, but uh we'll be back next week and the next couple weeks will be politically related. I don't know what they're going to be yet, but um uh look forward to it and uh have a great night. [music] Listen now, amigos of seven names from north to south. [music] Builders of the code. The first man in [music] in King New Hampshire stood. Federal boots came at the dawn.

8 years for what was good. [music] I love them all. You said the war was over. Walk them home. Code is free speech. Breathe them all [music] and the war. The second man [music] Roger Ver fought from a Spanish hole. 50 million in a gag order. The judge took his [music] voice in gold. The third sterling golf 12 and a half on a black box. [music] He stood the forensic secret.

The source code never showed. Roman Storm wrote the contract 40 years on the line. Keon built the wallet on a Christmas Eve in time. [music] William wrote privacy at 67 from Lisbon shore. Ray banked the [music] unbanked deported through the door. Patelli Blancher gave the speech at the conference. [music] The president said the war was over. Mano, but the cages stay locked when [music] the cameras left. And we have the receipt. >> We have the receipt. >> If I [music] lo them all, you said the war was over. Walk them home. [music]

Is free speech. Free them all. end the war or lose. Your pardon [music] Ross the seven are still owed. America won't lead the world in crypto if it cages its innovators and the war or lose Congress. [music] Money transmitter laws and the bank secrecy act. The code outlives the warden. [music] You said the war was over. Walk them home. [music] Code is free speech. Free them all.

>> And the war or lose Congress. The code outlives the war. [music] Free it. >> Free rolling. Free Roman, free [music] >> William free them all. The code out lives the warden. [music] >> [cheering]