Semafor: I Cost the GOP a Senate Seat. Now I'm Doing It to 8 More.

Welcome to The Aaron Day Show. I'm Aaron Day. I founded StarkFreedom PAC. We fund the margin. It costs the GOP, the Senate, eight states, eight candidates we back, eight songs we made for them. Here they are. New Hampshire. We back Ed Laplante of the Constitution Party. The song is Ed Laplante. It's a driving rock anthem. so kitchen tv pen in hand

i voted johnson Johnson, who now voted yes on the Wall Street bailout To over, no, there's a Richmond mechanic Who names the Fed and the plant Johnson, who now said no I said no right back at him Johnson, who sat on a devil's panel As our senator It says no foreign wars, no foreign aid. Johnson and Newton joined a cable company board that'll lobby and firm.

It fixed cars and clocked in at Walmart too to pay the medical bills. Under a hood in Richmond, it says the Fed answers to nobody. Johnson who never voted yes on the Wall Street bailout Too over now There's a rich man mechanic who needs a better plan

I stand by the turn. Johnson. Johnson. Johnson. Johnson. Johnson. Johnson. Johnson. Johnson. Johnson. Johnson who voted yes on the Wall Street bailout Do over No, there's a Richmond mechanic who names the Fed Ed LaPlan

I'm Mark Ed LaPlan This advertisement was generated in whole or substantially by artificial intelligence. Texas, we back libertarian Ted Brown. The song is Mouthpiece for DC. It's an arena rock anthem.

The Taliban in February Ken Paxton on the bandstand Swore off Washington, I'm not their person And I'm never gonna be their person And I clapped Paxton's mouthpiece for D .C. Ted Brown's the voice of Texas. Hey! I told her at the shop, but his phone played Paxson at a D .C. lobbyist lunch. It's all coming from D .C. I don't control message. Oh, what we're doing. Wipe my hands on my jeans and clap the white ball. Paxton's a mouthpiece for DC, Ted Brown's the voice of Texas.

Hanging the gate, he never buys Ted Brown's sign. Brown bows to no party boss's words. I just don't have any goodies to offer. Shook on it. Paxton's a mouthpiece for DC, Ted Brown's the voice of Texas. hey

and like what issues are gonna matter because it's all coming you know from dc mouthpiece for dc ted brown's the voice of texas these hands are mine again my vote my call

Kansas. We back libertarian David Graham. The song is David Graham. It's a gritty plains rock anthem. Truck radio, fair debate, Roger Marshall. Common business practice, turning some people into collections. Some people, I'm some people. This line grandstand's got theirs. Marshall's practice suit, 700 patients, 81 arrested. There's a line out over Lampark, David Graham.

Kitchen table, my ballot. Another doctor's collections letter. Marshall talks like I'm in the back. Kept reading past Marshall, David Graham, Overland Park. He ain't a Democrat, neither am I. Looked him up in 22, he wrote, freedom is the highest value. Marshall's back to suit, 700 patients. Anyone arrest a shame on you. There's a line at Overland Park, David Graham. Yeah!

Check Marshall's box for years No shame Game is free Never out, hell, hell Marshals practice suit, 700 patients Anyone arrested, shame on you There's a line out of Overland Park David Graham, hell, hell Marshals practice suit, 700 patients Anyone arrested, shame on you There's a line out over Lampart, David Graham. My pencil, my life,

David Graham. This advertisement was generated in whole or substantially by artificial intelligence. Michigan, we back Tim Long of the U .S. Taxpayers Party from Taylor. The song is A Line Out of Taylor. It's a hard rock anthem.

phone says he built sebring remember those i voted for him 1981. my garage chicken state senator he asked me to remember so i did 1981 Mike Rogers built the Seabreeze The Seabreeze from 95 There's a line out of Taylor Tim Long

Tim Long's on that valley Lives in Taylor Rogers came up 19 ,000 short This vote ain't the Democrats, mine never was. 1981, my garage has built a Sebring. A Sebring from 95, there's a line out of Taylor Town Hall.

This street builds cars We know the years 1981 I just built a Sebring Sebring's from From 95, there's a line at a table, Tim Long. Pin off the pegboard. Feelin' Tim Long. This advertisement was generated in whole or substantially by artificial intelligence.

Ohio. We back libertarian Bill Redpath. The song is 14 Marks. It's a raw garage blues rock anthem. radio call yeah the iron vote 14 times john hughes is in northern india it fell by 149 to 50 there's a line out of parisburg Real red fat Creased pencil on the drywall since March One mark for every Houston, no

My nephew's over there His picture's by the marks Mark 14, same, know his marks I don't call him names, I count them so pencil stops on the page i end in 2008 it says black interface remember grows the government's power bill red pass signed it libertarian national chairman that's how

i know the name same name got his own line on the november ballot john hughes March, 3 April, 3 May, 2 June, 3 July, 2 September, 1, 5, 4, 3

I know where my mark goes in November Pencils cap Iowa. We back libertarian Thomas Laehn. The song is Rechain the Dogs of War. It's a stomping arena anthem.

harvest co -op measles past six a gallon my nephew deployed his picture as a visor ashley Hinson lights my phone shouldn't have to foot the bill at the pump He ups and says she wants the war to end immediately She voted no to ending it six times The county prosecutor already said it retained the Dawes Award Thomas Laehn Thomas Laehn words don't move the scale votes do Thomas Laehn preacher's kid from

allison taught the constitution now prosecutes for green county she wants a successful and immediate end Thomas Laehn says, every war since Korea.

Presidents have taken our country to war unilaterally Without a declaration of war from Congress Successful and immediate end Hinson said she wants the war to end immediately She voted no to ending it six times A county prosecutor already said it retained the dogs of war Thomas Laehn Houston said she wants a war to end immediately She voted no to end and it's six times The county prosecutor already said We changed the dog to war Thomas Laehn Nozzle clicks

Still past six My mind's made up South Carolina. We back libertarian Kasie Whitener. The song is Kasie Whitener says no more. It's a stop and clap anthem. them.

still over there. 49 said force the vote. 50 said no remark among them. Darling Graham's one vote kept a sad war. Kasie Whitener says no more than the vote to bring them out once short again. Same name, same mark. Move that one mark and the 50s are. Darling Graham's one vote kept a sad war. Kasie Whitener says no more. The governor's pen gave her that seat before one ballot dropped.

She told the debate stage national security's not her thing. Darline Graham's one vote kept us at war. Kasie Whitener says no more Blame questions Time to end the war in Iran Kasie Whitener wrote her answer down Yes, out in the open For all of us to read Darline Graham's one book Kept us at war Kasie Whitener says no more Pickens County where she was born Went with the other man in the runoff That seeks on loan

Come November that one vote comes home to us Darline Graham's one vote kept us at war Kasie Whitener says no more I mean, Graham's one book kept a sad war Casey Weidner says no more

Minnesota. We back libertarian Rebecca Whiting. The song is Michelle Tafoya in a bucket. It's an upbeat dance pop anthem. Michelle Tafoya, pro -choice Republican, she said some of us out there. Put Michelle Tafoya in a bucket with the Democrat.

You can't tell them apart. Break a wine can. For the war, Michelle Tafoya said skip one and coffee, stretch your gas. We are not worth it. in a bucket with the democrat you can't tell them apart rebecca whiting Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca

White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can Rebecca White in Can waiting can she says it's time for less 1984 more 1776 november 3rd her name's on your ballot Have it, have it, have it, have it. Your pants, the margin. Michelle's a lawyer in a bucket with the

Democrat. You can't tell them apart. Rebecca Whiting. One more song. Our anthem for the whole fight. It's called Margin is Calling. Wakey wakey, margin is calling. Ooh, wakey wakey, margin is calling. Every autumn in your colors, every promised

a song so sweet i will cut your energy prices in half within 12 months you lie slow dance under the lights you whisper no more wars you lie you lie held close one more value swore you'd drain the swamp. You lie. No more Jersey on reflex. No herd that votes the color. You'll burn the vote or lose the Senate. We are holding you accountable. Who pays? We fund. Do you hear the margin calling?

We fund the margin. It costs the GOP, the Senate so hard to say goodbye. To the Senate. Who pays? We fund. Do you hear the margin calling? We fund the margin. Who pays? Cause the GOP, the Senate, so hard to say goodbye to the Senate. You lie. You lie. You lie. You lie. You lie. You lie. You lie. You lie. You lie.

Who pays? We fund. Do you hear the margin calling? We fight for the margin. It costs the GOP the Senate. No herd, no jersey, no reflex. Earn the voter or lose the Senate. Who pays? We fight for the margin. It costs the GOP the Senate. We fight for the margin. It costs the GOP the Senate. No herd, no jersey, no reflex. Flex. Earn the vote or lose the senate. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey.

Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. Wakey. that's all eight races and our anthem. Every song is at starkfreedom.org. Send one to someone who votes in one of these states. We go live at six. Stay right here. Can you hear me? I can hear you. How are you? Can you hear me? I can. Can you hear me? I can't hear you.

Okay, that's surprising. Hold on. Can you hear me now? Can you hear me now? I'm definitely not muted. So, yeah. Let me try something here. Can you hear me now? So, you can't hear me? I can hear you. You can? Yes. Okay. Let me see.

But you can't hear me. The audience can hear me. Let me see. It showed in the pre thing that it recognized the microphone. Yeah. I mean, again, people can hear me. And I can switch computers. let me try this can you hear me now um i'm just using my laptop and go outside

um in a second All right. This is very bizarre because you are, I can hear you. I can see you. There doesn't seem to be any reason this isn't coming through. True. You know, I wonder if you have the audio going to a different source. There's a setting for the microphone and then a setting for the speaker. I wonder if you have, I've done

that before. I wonder if you have the speaker set to a different audio source. so I really I think that that could be one one yep I can hear you there we go I hear an echo do you hear me yeah hold on I want to see yeah it's echoing it might be that you can hear through both of them hold on a second let me close this one I'm just wondering I wonder if you have the wrong speaker setting on the in stream yard if you click on the microphone icon sometimes

it will default to a different speaker either settings for the microphone and a setting for the speaker and sometimes it'll go to an alternate source So. How about now? Well, I can hear you. Can you hear me? Yeah. Hold on. Let me turn that one off. Can you hear me now? I can. No? Yeah, I can hear you. Okay, go ahead and talk. Let me see if I can hear you. Can you hear me?

I'm talking now. Testing, testing. One, two, three. Okay. My guess is it's the settings in StreamYard. So click. Well, you can't hear me, but if you could. Yeah, just test the sound. Again, click on the, well. I'm trying to do it through my headset. See how windy it is outside. All right. Let me go ahead and come back in on my laptop. Okay. All right. Well, while Ernie's doing that, welcome back to the Aaron Day Show. Season 3. I don't know why it was echoing, though.

Season 3, episode 37. Excuse me, episode 27. We have a very exciting episode tonight. night. I'm hearing an echo now. Yeah. Hold on. Let me turn off. All right. So, um, so, you know, obviously the last several episodes have been focused on, on politics, on the midterms, um, the use of a third party for political leverage and so forth. And, you know, I was thinking, well, who could I bring on as a guest to talk about this? And I ended up coming up with a short list of one person. There's only one person I could think of that would be perfect to talk about what's going on with this election

and actually the intention and the strategy behind the super PAC because a lot of people don't understand it for a variety of different reasons. And so if you're not familiar with Ernie, you probably are if you're listening to this and you're a regular listener. And I've been on Ernie's show many times. But Ernie is an absolute OG in all things kind of liberty -related, political and nonpolitical. So he hosts Declare Your Independence out of Phoenix, publishes something called Freedom's Phoenix. He's actually had me on his show, looks like 10 times now. and um always loved going on there um he's uh he has a tremendous

experience at set as i said both politically and non -politically he ran for arizona secretary of state as a libertarian in 1994 got six and a half percent of the vote and then ran again in 2006 he ran for libertarian party chair in 2008 and 2010. The man who beat him in 2008 is Bill Redpath, who is one of the candidates that we are supporting for the Ohio U .S. Senate race. He's, you know, as I've discussed on this show many times, I sued the Secretary of State in federal court and won using AI. Well, Ernie actually has sued the state without AI and won and

took Arizona's ballot access rules to the Ninth Circuit. He's the guy behind the Levolution logo. So I'm wearing it right now. I have the revolution will be tokenized. But for Ron Paul's campaign, that was Ernie Hancock. And he came out saying that we're not going to vote ourselves out. and he's been doing other things. So he's building Occupy the Land, which is 18 acres in Arizona's West Valley. So it's a private mesh network and basically just completely getting off the grid, exiting the system. Sorry, are you there? Yeah, can you hear me? I can hear you. Can you hear me? Yeah, we're good. I just had to switch computers. All right, good.

I was just doing an intro here. I don't know if you were hearing much of it. Yeah, I got it. He also launched Libertas .Earth with James Corbett. And of course, I had James on a month or so ago. I don't even know how long it's been now to talk about that. The philosophy of liberty, which has been translated in 54 languages and stored in a way that's censorship resistant. And so he is a true OG. I consider him a good friend. And again, I couldn't think of a better person to come on to talk about what's going on here with this political situation. And what I've described recently is a kind of a transition from this idea of just focusing on exit and build to

expose, obstruct, exit and build. And I think that this political piece of this is key to obstructing what they're doing, because as quickly as we may be trying to exit and build, we are not moving. We're moving a fraction of a percent of the speed with which they're deploying technocracy. And so I think there are some really interesting strategies. I think this PAC is one of them. And I wanted Ernie to come on to talk about this and to talk about some of the dynamics because it's been a fascinating week, but a couple of weeks and the dynamics are rapidly changing. So thank you for coming on. Oh, my pleasure. And what you're doing, we've been following this tactic for

30 years. I mean, you know, all through the 90s, I started being an activist in the late 80s when I was 28. And then once I discovered libertarianism, like, you know, found my my home. But the point was, is that we were never really about affecting the outcome of the election. It was general public opinion. It was determining what was debated. It was making, you know, earning a lot of media. And we get on the soapbox to say our say. We didn't know the impact of getting five, six, seven, eight percent. Whoa. They didn't like that. None too much.

And we weren't even looking at numbers. But what we were saying was resonating. So, of course, at the top of Freedom's Phoenix right now, we have the election, Maricopa County elections, which was always corrupt. And we knew that from a long time ago. Now everybody knows. They got caught slipping a USB drive into it and, oh, no. Well, you know, we got sorry. And so they do an ex post of explaining it doesn't matter. And so we understood the power of being a kingmaker. A lot of times, you know, like what you're doing, you know, we were going, you know, some of these uncontested races, they have an incumbent Republican and no Democrat. Hell, we'll go in there

and play. We never really pursued that we could have because people knew we were libertarian. Just playing their game, you know, on their field with their referees, you know, and their sportscasters and so on. We're the guys in the end zone with the rainbow afro, you know, waving John 316 or something, you know. And but we had a lot of impact. By the end of the 90s, the Wall Street Journal came out and go, Arizona, the libertarian state. Man, they did not like that none too much. Then we did things. We had our own newspaper called CTI, Citizens Taking Initiative, where we filed a bunch of initiatives, like 36 initiatives one year of the legislation that we would

do. Just the filing of those became bills. So, when, and then some of them law like concealed unrestricted concealed carry in Arizona, you know, a lot of education freedoms and reforms. We had a reduction in this tax and that tax. I mean, Free State Project, we were down for that, you know, before it was even selected. At our Freedom Summits in the early 2000s, we had the young man coming and putting up his table, and we had the only Freedom Summit that we ever had outside of Arizona was in Manchester when they first had selected it. The day after they selected on my radio show out of Scottsdale, what was her name? I think Amanda

Phillips. You know, she came on the next morning to announce. So we understood the power of exactly what you're doing and what the mission was for bringing free people in a concentrated area. And once the population understands your philosophy, you know, labels don't matter. It doesn't make any any difference because when you have an opportunity to register your opinion at the ballot box, assuming it's accurate, which I'm not a fan of, like you're still voting. I mean, you know, but the to have that kind of impact forces the discussion. And what you're doing is you made it very clear why you're doing it. They had a chance to work with you. They didn't. You

had, you know, secret plan B. We're going to do some whip ass. And this has been such a good example of the power we have when we make it clear this is payback. This is a block of votes that you don't have in your pocket. There are freedom -oriented, libertarian, leave -me -alone -ist, voluntarist, whatever, that will punish you for lying to them. And this entire Trump administration, all the campaigning he did, all the folksy whatever, you know, and war. You know, so, you know, I want to, before I turn it back to you, I want to make this one point. We were talking about this today on the show.

We do the Trump report for 11 years, every week for 11 years. Dr. Tambury, he was a big Trump fan. Now he doesn't even vote anymore. It took me about nine, 10 years, but, you know, he's not voting anymore. But the we went and saw just as, you know, out with the girls, you know, our wives and went and saw the movie Melania. Now, Melania, that was her payback for Vogue not putting her on the cover and I'm first lady again, ha ha ha, whatever it was. But that whole movie was not really about Trump. It was about their life. And what you got is they are in a totally different strata. They do not have anything in common. You watch it, and it's okay. It was entertaining. She dresses

well and fashionista. It doesn't matter. But it reminded me of Melda Marcos back decades ago when they were deposed from the Philippines, how she had 3 ,000 pairs of shoes, that kind of thing. And it was just so separate, this class of people, from the needs and desires and the perspective of the mass population out here. They can't understand. It's not available to them. They don't know. They may be able to, like, you know, Marco Rubio gave a speech at the Acropolis in Greece. It was a fantastic speech. speech. And I don't know who wrote it, but he's not going to abide by it.

And the bottom line was, you know, Western culture is going to rise up again and we got a military to make sure, you know, I'm like, wow, I'm not feeling any better. So what you're doing is all of the abuses that America is suffering at the R's and D's, it doesn't make any difference. You know, It doesn't matter and I don't care. But to make them pay for lying, to pay for lying during the campaign, the rhetoric that they use, to be not forthright with what they're doing. And then, oh, by the way, Trump family and sons make a boatload of money off of it. And now I got a $5 ,000 bribe promised me. Donna and I, that's $10 ,000. You vote for Republicans,

pinky swear, we're going to get it. We'll skate it through. Yeah, yeah, yeah. We need Republicans. And that's $1 .whatever trillion to 200 and whatever million people, 200 million people plus of adults that get this. It's $1 .2, $1 .3 trillion they're going to add to the debt. They're just bribing us. It's so unseemly. and the fact that you took this to them and said, look, man, we got a few asks here. And then they lied to you. They don't do it. And then payback. So I'm supportive of what you're doing and your AI skills in creating the ads. You know, this is one thing I'm going, we didn't have that in the 90s. We were struggling to

find graphic artists that could do simple things. I'm going to guys from high school, you know, graphic artists to do some of our art. animation was you know not even a thing no online video no streaming no instant communication no telegram signal whatever now the technology as much as they want to use ai to slap us around and they got an individual narrative for every one of the eight billion people on the planet to try and convince you of whatever the heck it is that they're doing that is a double -edged sword and you You have embraced it and going to be doing some ass whipping. Peace. I'm on your side, man. Let's do it. Yeah, I

appreciate that. That's been, I mean, I've been working like 18 hours a day trying to get all this stuff together because this PAC was kind of a last minute thing. But I literally have, as we're doing this podcast, I have four computers that are doing nothing but creating ads and music videos. And they're running 24 -7. And, you know, I didn't realize I'd be using it for this. I started using it to raise awareness around crypto prisoners and around technocracy. But boy, what an application. Because we now have, I think, 70 ads that are live in eight states. And every state has a theme song, which I played at the introduction here. But I've got more

songs coming. And I really enjoy doing it. And, you know, and part of it is just figuring out, you know, people aren't necessarily going to listen to the whole song, but then, you know, figuring out the clips and then and doing the targeting. It's actually been it's been fun. And I actually think it's going to be turn out to be very, very effective. I actually, as I stood up there, you know, we're going to cost the GOP the Senate. We're going to hold Trump accountable. Hopefully this will lead to maybe stopping the war because that the Senate was 50 to 49. I mean, they actually could have stopped it. but the Republicans wanted to keep it going.

Lower prices and expose corruption. And I'm going to tell you this. I actually think next year, most of next year is going to be about impeachment hearings. And it's going to be about the corruption within the Trump administration because the Dems, I'll give them this. They don't mess around on this stuff. The Republicans talk about doing stuff like this and then they don't do anything about it. Next year, you're going to learn about world liberty financial. You're going to learn about what was going on with the technocratic reconstruction of Gaza and USD one. I mean, that is that mark my words this time next year. These are going to be mainstream topics. Things that

you and I have been talking about for years is now going to be mainstream news because it's going to be a part of these impeachment hearings. And and it should be. This should happen because it is it's actually unprecedented corruption. I mean, you mentioned it doing this Trump report. I mean, how do you do the Trump report and not come away with, man, like there's no, the idea that Watergate was a scandal is almost something that's unfathomable at this point. So. Let me tell you how the Trump report started. It was when he came down the escalator in 2015. A good friend of mine, a doctor here in the Scottsdale area. area. He was a big Trump

fan and he came to me and he, his father and uncle were in the high rise steel business in Philadelphia. And he's originally from Philadelphia. So it was kind of, you know, I don't know if you got Christmas cards from the same contractors or whatever is Trump kind of deal. He, he understood that. And he was interested in him, his persona, whatever he read the art of the deal. And of course, you know, know, he paid attention to whatever he's going, Ernie, he's going to win. This is, I don't think people understand what's going on. Now, for the first part of the 16 campaign, he was, oh, I'm not committed, you know, I'm not, but he went full,

you know, trumped hard, man. I mean, it was, so he asked, he goes, I want to do a show on this to have people understand what's coming. And I go, absolutely. I can say, you're still voting a bunch of times, you know, I just, we're going to have some fun. Let's do it. Now, what happened was as time went on and all the broken promise, all the crap and the war and so on, finally, this last election, he just took his ballot and put it in his office shredder. He's just, I'm done. I win. It took me a decade, but you know, so in doing the show, you highlight, so I am so Trump administration up on everything. And it has been they, them,

those. You always go to, you know, us conspiracy nut, who are they? And I'll tell you who they are. There are those that just want to be left alone and those that just won't leave you alone. That's who they, them, those are. So I just categorize them all, you know, alien Klingons or, you know, freaking, you know, the Chinese, right? Whatever. I just, are you going to leave me alone or not? Well, you just get to go in one or two categories. You leave me alone or you're not. Well, the Trump administration advocating for a whole bunch more of not leaving me alone and certainly going into debt and a war. I would say I see a mushroom cloud, nuclear war, comply

no more. Try to get another freaking compliance, license, tax, anything for me. You know, we started nuclear. You fail. You're done. You know, whatever. Yeah, but I don't care. Mushroom cloud. Done. Done, done, done, done, done. done. So what you're doing is, you know, all of these guys, R's and D's are in on this. This is a they, them, those thing. It's not a Republican, Democrat, blue, red, whatever they say they're going to vote. Whenever it comes down to it, you can count on the Federal Reserve being there. You can count on the IRS being there. You can count

on the military industrial complex being in there. You can count on big pharma poisoning us. You can count on, count on, and count on. No matter who you vote for, government wins. And what you're doing is making sure that there's some payback for them in a creative way that we've had a lot of experience here in Arizona. We have always, but it wasn't intentional. You know, it wasn't like we wanted to cost this one or that one. One of them, my senior editor, Pal Gamble, the microbiologist that he He worked at the Arizona Department of Health as a scientist. And after 9 -11, he was exposed to all the gazillion

dollars of money of equipment and lab and check that powder stuff. He had no place to put it. He took me down to the Arizona, the building and big, wide hallway, just full of plastic wrapped equipment that they couldn't even use. They were just slinging money everywhere. So he finally left, became my senior editor of Freedom's Phoenix, ran for Congress as a libertarian in the race for Congress with Kyrsten Sinema. This is where Kyrsten Sinema came from. She was a state legislator. She got a long story. I've known her for a long time. Very smart woman, very socialist. list. What happened was it was her, a woman, white woman, but bi, identified as bisexual. So,

you know, she got, you know, some cred with the whatever groups there. The Republican was a black, I think he was mayor of Paradise Valley here. And a lot of issues are, you know, circling around between it. You got a black man and a, you know, bi woman and, you know, well, here comes the libertarian he goes up in the debates and every time opening statement answering questions closing statement you're still voting what's the difference he got like seven to eight percent well it was many times the difference between them and the democrat won so of course the democrats love on some libertarians while the republicans are doing everything they can to keep us off the the ballot, making it more

unconstitutional as hell. I understand election law. I challenged 44 election laws all the way in the Ninth Circuit. I got a bunch of Ernie laws. But the problem was, is that, you know, they change it a little bit, tweak it, do the same thing, same result, same. Arizona has, for some reason, been a nail that sticks up out of the 50 the states nails in the two by four. So what do they do? Here comes the hammer, bam. You know, we got to nail that down. So we have challenged them lawsuits. I've had like three lawsuits, Arizona Supreme Court, you know, a bunch of superior court, all of the Arizona Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, you know,

oral argument for the Ninth Circuit. I get it. But I didn't get any of the advancement that people would think from the process or them going, oh, gee, you just had to explain this constitution thing to us. It's all good. You win. That was not where I got the movement. It's what you're doing. It was general public opinion. It was educating people. It was demonstrating resistance is not futile. If you do that and you're principled and you make it very very clear why you're doing what you're doing. They have to answer to us. This is why Trump went to the Libertarian Party and goes, I'm going to free Ross Ulbricht and vote for me. What else did he say that libertarians, nobody

remembers, nobody cares. He just made a deal. Well, the Trump administration lied to you. That was their biggest mistake. So tell me about some of the races. Let's talk about them. Yeah. Let me jump into that. I've got a lot lot of stuff. I'll probably go through some of this quickly, but I want to highlight because there are three themes that resonate across all eight states. And then there are specific issues for each state. But based on all the information, obviously, the price of oil is a huge issue across the country. There's no hiding from it. And remember what Trump said. Trump said, I will cut your energy and electricity prices in half within 12

months. That was his statement. So I, cause I see a lot of people that, you know, I'll, I'll do a post. It's like, Hey, I just paid 445 a gallon for gas. You know, how much did you pay? And then the response back will be, well, but it was $5 under Biden or whatever. It's like he promised they would cut electricity prices in half within 12 months. He didn't. He said we would never be in any new wars in the Middle East. That was a lie. And then the Republicans have continued to vote to keep us in that war. Gaff is up a dollar and 23 cents per year. He promised to drain the swamp. And then he brought in Howard Lutnick, who I truly believe is the

embodiment, the mascot of the swamp. I don't think there's a you know, maybe Epstein is the only one that would be at a higher level than that. I actually heard, I was listening to a podcast with Jimmy Dore and Tucker Carlson yesterday, and they were finally talking about the fact that, you know, they think that Lutnick is kind of behind whatever Trump's, the diversion of Trump from whatever he said he was going to do to what he's doing. He actually did some of the stuff that he said he was going to do the first term. Not much of it, but some. But he's completely off the reservation. And so Lutnick is a horrible player involved with

Tether and the tariffs. I mean, everywhere you go, even the regulation of AI is under his domain. It's amazing how much power this guy has. has. So our mission is to fund the margin that costs the GOP the Senate. This is the goal. And what started out as one race, because at one point I was a candidate and my idea was, hey, I'll do this in New Hampshire. Because at the time, the prediction markets were 50 -50, New Hampshire was going to be a toss -up state. And then they lied to me. I basically said, said, listen, you know, if you actually, the whole point of my race was to hold them accountable. And my, my position was

one of two ways. Either you can actually do some of the things that you said you were going to do before I put my name on the ballot. Or if you continue to not do any of the things that you said you were going to do, we're certainly not going to elect you again. And then I'll put my name on the ballot and there's a good chance that'll cost you the seat. and that seat could cost you control of the Senate. And long story short, they said they were going to do something. They didn't. They lied. I had a plan B, and the plan B was originally, I was really just like, okay, well, I know there's this

Constitution Party candidate, Ed Laplante, who's a great guy, and the Constitution Party is completely aligned. In fact, I was actually, I didn't think he was going to get ballot access. I didn't know that he was going to be on the ballot, and I kind of felt bad because I knew that my being in the race would make it really difficult for him to get 4%. And his goal is to get 4 % because if he gets 4 % for the Constitution Party, they'll have ballot access in 2028. So this turns out to be great. I'm like, okay, well, hey, I can just support. I'll put together a super PAC. I've run a super PAC before, and we'll support Ed. And then as I started looking at what's going on across the country,

there's just a massive shift now. And all of these states that no one ever thought would be in play, Texas, Iowa, Kansas. I'm like, you know what? I'm going to take the super PAC. And if there's a good third party candidate who will likely draw significantly more votes from the Republican party than the Democrat party, then I'll support those. So now we're in eight races, and our candidate is currently the margin in five out of the eight states. Oh, you know what? One thing that I want to make sure the audience knows that you didn't explain is that you did get your signatures. You were standing at the Secretary of State right here. Now, they tried to stop you, and you filed suit and won, them

trying to keep you off the ballot. Damn it. He's got the signatures. He's got a legal judgment that he gets to file, and you're standing there kind of leaning to the counter, oh, we'll put these petitions down right up to the last minute. Nope, nope, nope. Well, if you do that, then, you know, God, and they lied. I'm so glad that you're making them pay. You gave them an opportunity. Now you're going to make them pay. And you know, we were talking that day about what was going on because I thought something was supposed to happen that day. My wife and I actually went to the Secretary of State's office because we had just

won the lawsuit for them to accept my declaration of candidacy. So we actually had a wagon and we took all of the petitions that we had, we had an excess, like almost a thousand more signatures than we needed, validated. And we took our little wagon, we went to the Secretary of State's office just to make sure they would be willing to accept? Were they going to honor the court's decision? Because just because we won in court doesn't mean there's going to be some other last minute theatrics. So we go in around one o 'clock and then they were ready for us. They were actually polite. They were fully prepared to accept my declaration of intent and

fully prepared to accept the petitions. So then my wife and I went across the street to a restaurant and basically, you know, for for four hours behind the scenes, I'm texting, trying to get some stuff done. And in the end, you know, I, I, I was, I was, I was told, I wouldn't say I was told, but people suggested that I trust a promise regarding one of the demands. And of course I didn't think they were going to honor it at the time, but I knew I had the plan B, but yeah, no, we, we, we, we did so much work to be able to get on the ballot. And it, by the way, it was great leverage because at that moment in time, the weekend before I was to file was the one and only time that John

Easton Nunu was ahead in the poll. There was just this one blip of a poll where he was up by three, which if I were on the ballot, we would wipe that out. And so like at the moment that all of this was going on, this was a real deal that the whole Senate could have hinged on this. Now, as we'll talk about tonight, night, New Hampshire is really not even in play. There's some phenomenal dynamics today in the state of New Hampshire. I don't know if you've followed this, but there are two big developments in New Hampshire, which we'll get to. The thing I have on the screen right now is that in terms of

the proof point for this model, I've already done this. I did this in 2016. And I did this not just me running for US Senate. I actually recruited a slate of candidates. In fact, they were were libertarians who I convinced to run as independents. And we were the margin in all three of those races. You can see it on the screen. I got 17 ,700 votes. The margin was 1 ,000. In one of the congressional districts, the guy got 34 ,735 votes. The margin was 4 ,900. And then the other district, it was 17 ,000 votes versus a margin of 15 ,522. So we took out all All three. And as a result, New Hampshire didn't send a Republican to Congress for like the first

time since 1854. And they haven't sent one since. This is the power of this model. I'm using this this third party margin for these races. Now, I want to say that there was an article in Semafor yesterday. yesterday. And the thing about this is that, I mean, this is a publication that is really, I mean, the guy, Burgess Everett, is considered one of the elite reporters covering Congress. He's like the guy covering the Senate. And what's interesting is he covered me in 2016 when he was at Politico. So he already knew me. And I remember when he talked to

me 10 years ago, I said, listen, I'm going to run as an independent. I'm going to cost Kelly at the seat. And of course, I think he was skeptical at the time, just like everyone was. Everybody told me it wouldn't work in 2016. So he actually wrote this article that was the front page of Semafor, why one spoiler candidate is now trying to replicate his work nationwide. And he does understand what we're doing here. I mean, he expressed some skepticism in the article, but he did reach out to the White House and he reached out to to top political operatives fundraising for the Republicans in the Senate. No one wanted to comment. No comment. No comment.

His comment was, well, they don't seem particularly worried about it, but then no comment, which means they're worried about it. And in fact, somebody did go on the record and said, well, we're not worried about what he's going to do nationwide, but we're still worried about what he's going to do in New Hampshire. So the bottom line is this is now, I know, I can assure you, the top people in the administration know what's going on here. So the question is, you know, what are they going to take it seriously? What are they going to do about it? We'll see that next. But some other quotes in that article were, you know, you called a spoiler campaign. I

call it holding Republicans accountable. And by the way, I'm not, you know, the interesting thing about this is most super PACs are shady. Nobody knows anything about super PACs. You go to a super PAC website, you don't know who's behind it or whatever. I'm kind of like, this is like an open source super PAC. I've got a website you can see all the stuff we're doing I'm giving you all the rationale I'm telling you exactly why I'm doing it and uh and the thing is I actually think this election cycle people are so pissed off at Trump that I actually think they're looking if they can place a vote specifically to send a message

they're willing to do it in fact many of them are willing to actually vote them which I'll get to this is actually happening in New Hampshire and And what I'm saying is, whoa, whoa, whoa, look, you're going to regret that. I don't like, you know, the Dem here, Chris Pappas. He's I've been against him in a couple of different elections. I would recommend you put your vote towards Ed Laplante because Ed represents likely what you actually would like to see in government. He represents the direction you'd like to see the Republicans go in. Yeah, I want to make a point about that. They always say you're wasting your vote and all that kind of stuff.

we made it very clear. We went all Aaron day on them for decades that a vote for libertarian and the freedom oriented rhetoric that we would have. And we're all in line. I mean, you know, Arizona is we're not just libertarian. We're Arizona libertarian kind of thing. Well, what happened is that was a block of vote. They, they had to get it. Hell Trump went to the libertarian party. I mean, you know, he's looking for a block of vote. Well, Well, what happened was in 96, one of my best friends was running for Congress. We were all running together. I was running for Congress, whatever. He ran against, the Republican was a sportscaster here

on the NBC affiliate. So he, you know, had name recognition. He was popular. Well, he was running against the state chair of the Democratic Party. party. So both of them, it was the most expensive congressional race up to that time. It was, I don't know, 30 to 80 million. That was some ridiculous amount of money. Well, there was a libertarian, my friend, Bob Anderson. He gets up there, you know, he represented, you know, kind of rural Arizona, freedom oriented, yada, yada, yada. Well, because of a lot of our activism, Activism, lawsuits, and, you know, League of Women Voters, you know, go out. Well, we're a bipartisan organization. Well, you're violating your 501. So you can't be bipartisan.

You got to be nonpartisan. You're supporting this two party. I mean, what the hell? So all of our activism and so on, finally, we'll let the libertarians in because this is what they thought. These libertarians are going to come off crazy and then everybody will know. That's not what happened. All of a sudden, they're gubernatorial candidates. I ran for secretary of state, you know, later Congress, U .S. Senate against McCain. All of you, they're going, wow, what they said. So you start getting endorsements from, you know, schools and college papers and that kind of stuff. But of course, the mainstream, you know, hell no. Well, what

happened was he gets up and they were going on about the same thing they do now, the deficit. You know, Social Security is going to run out of money, yada, yada, yada. And he goes, we need to, the Democrats, we need to build a firewall around Social Security. Bob gets up and he goes, I want to build a firewall around my wallet. How about we do that? And it's always they got a plan and this guy's plan is better than that plan. The Libertarians were like, our plan is that you get to have your own plan. How about that? That was the whole point. This resonated. The difference in that first rate, it was Anderson, Hayworth, Owens, one and two. And I think it might have been a third one. In

96, he was like 10 times the difference between the two. The Republican barely squeaked by. The entire campaign, he would say, my liberal opponent, my liberal opponent, my liberal opponent, of course, referring to the Democrat, not even mentioned in libertarian candidate or philosophy. He barely squeaked by. Well, then, and it took weeks. There was a lot of shenanigans went on. You know, it took a while before and he's declared winner. Two years later, the same three candidates ran the Republican arms around. I went to church with him. I knew the guy. He goes, Ernie, if you keep doing this, the Democrat will win. And I'm going, you're confusing me with someone who thinks there's a difference.

Oh, he went all purple, purple gorilla on that one. But the thing is, is that in that next campaign in 98, Oh, my bestest buddy, libertarian arm around. We're on the same page. You know they're full of crap. They're never going to do it. But the mindset totally changed in the electorate. The whole, the issues that we were advocating for, the things that we wanted became part of their platform. form. Same thing happened with the Ron Paul campaign. The reason I was so behind the Ron Paul campaign, that Levolution logo came from my campaign in 06 running for Secretary of State. I knew how popular it was, and I knew that I didn't have to make excuses for Ron.

Ron, freedom guy, head down plow, bring attention to him. Our goal was how long could we keep him up up on that podium. That was it. Oh, we get to do it in 12 too? All right, we'll do that. So this, what you're doing has way more history, way more power than I think people realize. And it is not just that you're supporting the alternative candidate to cost them the election. It's why, because you are very clear in what you stand for, that you are libertarian, that you are our voluntarist, leave me alone, whatever freaking, their promises don't mean anything. And they have a totally abandoned the constitution hell before the ink dried on it. So this argument now between Hamilton and

Jefferson, they go, Oh, we're going to be a Hamilton. Well, Hamilton was a big government guy. You know, we're like this Jefferson thing down to the individual. So I just want the audience to understand there is so much more power behind what Aaron is doing than I think people realize. We've experienced it here in Arizona. Now, you know, you leave for a little while or stop or go on the Love Bus Liberty Tour or start focusing national on, you know, the Ron Paul revolution and everything. All of a sudden, here come the liberals and the Dems and the election fraud. And all of a sudden, Arizona starts to shift.

But it's not that way in the minds of the people. And if there were accurate elections and we just top of the story, Freedom Freedom's Phoenix today, freedom'sphoenix .com, Maricopa County gets caught after they did their logistic and accuracy test and so on. Late at night, somebody's got video. They come in, they put a USB into the computer. Oh, I'm so shocked. So if you can get an accurate election and you have the rhetoric that you're advocating for and why you're doing this, it will have an impact. And I think they know it. And they are, I don't know why they lied to you. I don't know who did. I don't know, but they're going to pay. And I want to help. They are going to

pay. I don't know either. I would say, but, you know, I know who I've been told that it is, but because I don't know it directly, it could be any of a number. I don't want to defame anyone, but let's just say it's top people. And politics. And, you know, and they, so they know what's going on. It's just surprising that they wouldn't take this seriously. And they probably are regretting it now because even if you look at the deterioration of the polls and Trump's approval just since September the 3rd, which was the date that I was going to put my paperwork in, they're probably at this point desperately clinging on anything that they can do to stop the bleeding. And so I wanted to say

that part of what's important about this, because you bring up a good point, this is an important thing to do. And there's a big debate right now where people just say, well, you've got to pick the Republican versus the Democrat. That's the only choice that you have. So vote and then fight afterwards. words and the problem with this but the problem with this is is that demoralizing if you vote if you keep on voting and they do the opposite there's no there's no holding them accountable and they actually run on the basis of um this party dynamic yeah the guy sucks you're we we lied and uh and our guy sucks but vote for him because he's not the other guy here's an example of Trump on this.

Voter ID, you're voting on voter ID. Go out and vote. Even if you hate John Youstead, even if you hate Vivek Ramaswamy, you're going to go out, you're going to vote, and then you're going to pull their triggers. But nobody hates them. They're so... I mean, you know, so shut up and vote, even if you don't like these people. And if you keep falling for that, again, there's no accountability and there will be no change. And so this is critically important. So we already are the margin in five of eight races. But on top of that, if you go and you look into this, so much of this is based on Trump's approval. So Trump's approval rating has absolutely plummeted. I mean, he's right now at about

37 .3%. I saw some poll today that had him at 32%. This is historic low. This is like worse than FDR at his low point. This is worse than George W. Bush. This is truly a catastrophic situation. And so people want to express their dissatisfaction with Trump. And this is why I think that this third party opportunity, it's more important to express your dissatisfaction now than in any other election. Make it very clear. Make it it's black and white. If all of a sudden these third party candidates outperform, then you sent a very specific message that had very dire consequences for the people that have lied and lied.

The argument that they're going to make is that. But then the Democrats get in there. And the same thing I did at J .D. Hayworth. I'm like, you know, you're confusing us with people that think there's a difference. This is not you need to vote. Vote your conscience. Vote for freaking freedom. Vote for, you know, what you want. Vote for, be a block. Have a block of vote that they have to cater to. They have to appease. They have to satisfy. They have to. Because if you don't, they won't. And if you just keep doing this Republican -Democrat thing, it's just going to keep spiraling down. I think we're at a point where it's, you

know, I get a lot of flack from Dr. Tamborou when we do the Trump report. He'll come up with some stat and a lot of this time I go, I don't care. Doesn't matter. Doesn't matter. I don't care. I don't care. Doesn't matter. Doesn't matter. Doesn't matter. Because it doesn't matter. You know, what's baked in the cake is coming. All their stuff that they're doing, you know, $5 ,000 if we, you know, maybe $10 ,000 to me in my life. don't care. I mean, you're going to get it anyway, you know, and I'm just, I, I don't want to encourage bad behavior. You have to incentivize what you want. You

want to see more freedom oriented stuff. You want to, you want to see that? Well, you've got to encourage it. You got to vote for it. You got to give $5. You got to spend, you know, five minutes on forward a thing. I mean, it's up to us. And we do have a system. That was one thing. Marco Rubio gave a speech at the Acropolis in Greece. I watched it. I was really impressed. That was awesome. Now, of course, Marco Rubio is one of those and you can't get his stop, swap and spit with Netanyahu. But I mean, you know, he gave a really good speech. This speech was awesome. Our history and culture comes from Greece, you know blah blah blah blah

blah but and to defend it we need a kick -ass military and we're gonna go whip ass you know and i and you see the subtext in there it doesn't matter how great their speech is it doesn't matter the red meat that they throw the populace they're gonna do what they're gonna do who they them those the ones that won't leave me alone you know it's gonna be the bank the war on crypto is over that's what we were told i was at uh what was it year ago go August in Las Vegas. Ross Ulbrich spoke and of course Trump got him out. So he had nice things to say. But you know, the point was, is that the war on crypto is over. No, the

war on them doing crypto is over because they're going to do what they're going to do and be gazillionaires. But anyone that's doing privacy coins, anyone that's making it, you know, the people's money, anyone that's innovating. No, your ass is going to jail. You are so not approved. This people need to understand this. And I can't think of anybody better than Aaron freaking day doing this going, yeah, and this is why. So I'm with you, brother. Yeah. Well, so it's the war on crypto is worse. I mean, it's actually materially worse. There are actually more people in prison and then they propose the Clarity Act and the Genius Act. I do think after this election, when the Dems take over.

I want to say one other point because the other point that they make is, well, if the Dems win, we're going to get socialism. If the Dems win, we're going to get gridlock. Let's be very clear on what the outcome is. By the way, at this point in time is the best I believe we can hope for within the existing system. Gridlock, believe me, if we can slow down technocracy, it gives us more time to exit and build. Gridlock is great. I would love nothing more than the next two years being an absolute shit show with hearings and investigations where it's the two parties exposing each other about how corrupt they are that's the actual outcome of this which by the way great as opposed to what

you know if if republicans retain control what what having palantir rocket slant to tyranny i mean you know the the and i've been saying this we've had had technocrats we've had claude schwab's plan for the last two years without any friction we're man we're getting agenda 2030 in 2028 based on the way this was going so nothing and here's your happy shot yeah that's exactly where this thing is going so so i welcome gridlock i welcome investigations and hearings like that is a good point and you may not you know being a youngin but you know back in the clinton administration when you had the republicans controlled uh the House and Senate, whatever you had, you know, not

one party controlling all of the legislative branch and executive. What happened? I think that was the only year that the deficit, you know, the the debt went down. I think there was a surplus one year. It was because of gridlock. So I'm going gridlock, gridlock, you know, there'll be gridlock. What? Government? Yay. I mean, seriously, this is like supposed to be a bad thing. Exactly. So people should welcome that. It's not it's not a oh, everything is going to go to the other side. It's it's gridlock. And then but we're going to expose what I believe is going to be. Again, I think this administration is the most corrupt just

based on the area that I focused on with with CBDCs and crypto. I mean, just between Howard Lutnick and the Trump family and all of the crypto scams, it's an unprecedented level of corruption. And so it's tied into the Board of Peace and everything else. So I've wanted people to know that. I've been trying to educate people about it. If it takes Trump being impeached and there being hearings in front of Congress. Marcus, by the way, some of these articles of impeachment have already been drafted. So I'm not making this stuff up. When I say World Liberty Financial is going to be a big issue, it's already been drafted.

Raskin's already drafted some of these articles of impeachment. And by the way, in this case, this isn't a witch hunt. This stuff is valid. But it's going to take how many in the Senate? I think it takes not just a majority. It's 60 or two -thirds or something to actually impeach him. I mean, convict him after impeachment by the House. so he's probably not going to get thrown out of office i guarantee he's not going to resign he's not doing nixon thing but it's definitely going i'm looking for the trial we know we'll try exactly the trial what the trial is going to do is i'm working on this book the creature from epstein's island which you know this

you know i don't know if i should write it before i was planning on getting it out before but frankly a lot of the material is going to come out of this trial People need to know this stuff. And so you're going to learn about technocracy. If you've been listening to me, you've been hearing about it, but you're going to learn about it from these impeachment hearings. And so anyway, I'll skip through some of this. But with an approval rating like this, historically, they're going to lose some seats. But I mean, at this point, it's actually a bloodbath from what I'm seeing in terms of the reversal here. And it's actually

deteriorating by week. 61 % think the country is on the wrong track. General ballot for Congress is Democrat plus 8 .3, which when you consider what happened in 2004 is breathtaking. 27 % approve of Trump on inflation and the cost of living and only 35 % approve of the Iran war. I mean, this is a serious issue. Yeah, but Trump, he's buddies with Putin now. He's like, give us some diesel. We're going to take down the, you know, we're going to take off the sanctions, give you some of your money back, give us some, oh, it's all good. Don't worry about it. Prices will go down. We got that. Then it's the October surprise.

We're going, October surprise. Here comes the October surprise. We're going to have an October surprise. Well, if the $5 ,000 was the October surprise, really? That was it? You know, I don't think that the reason I bring up the movie Melania, if you saw it, you would see that they're so removed from the American people. That was one of the charms of Trump is that, you know, he's out shaking bulldozer driver hands and he understands the construction and being part of and whatever. No, he doesn't have a really understanding. And he always wanted to be in the gazillionaire club and be, you know, captain of the lacrosse team of, you know, Yale, whatever. I mean, he's all about his

vanity, his ego. And that is so easy to manipulate. manipulate you know that psychological evaluations by other countries and intelligence communities and so on they know certainly israel knows exactly how to play him well in iran what are they doing we don't gotta do anything you know you attack us we blow up another ship we do it we just have to not surrender you know that's it that's all i gotta do and then after the midterms is he going going to amp up the war? You know, I wonder what's going to happen after the midterms, what he's going to do and what the people of America are going to do. The polling, that's why we got in an argument today. I mean, we always

argue back and forth, Dr. Frank and I, but on the Trump report, he's going on like you are about the polling data. Polling data, he's going to get his ass kicked. Polling data, polling data. I go, you know, by doing that, you're going, well, the Democrats going, it doesn't matter. All this does not matter. I can't muster up enough, give a crap. What I care about is what you're doing. What I care about is making them pay. What I care about is demonstrating the power of general public opinion and being informed about what the real issues are. That's what I care about. The numbers change, go back and forth. I was shocked that Trump won against Clinton that first and 16 election. Like, damn,

they allowed that. Well, if they did, how'd they sneak that one by? You know, what do they do? And that was one thing I was thinking when Ron Paul was running. I go, the only way that they can allow someone like Ron Paul or Thomas Massey or Marjorie Taylor Greene or Tucker Carlson or whatever pops up out of this America First thing or something. them. The only way that that will happen is if they, them, those feel that it's in their best interest to allow it to happen. You know, if Trump gets in, you know, secretly he's making a deal. Look at his first cabinet. I mean, it was a swamp. Hell, this was a swamp. You know, it's just,

there's no difference. So I'm looking at what we can glean. And the reason I'm supporting what what you're doing, and I say these things, is because this kind of activism, this kind of effort, this kind of demonstration of power behind the opinion and how it's manifested in votes of the people, as much as I can depend on the accuracy, that's what's important, is the education of this. And now that we have the internet, remember in 08 with Ron Paul, you know, you're just a few years after YouTube started. You just had, you know, you know, like you can transmit, you know, we had Facebook. I mean, you know, it was now we got AI and you have demonstrated

piss Aaron off that afternoon. You're going to get us a music video. Yep. No, I mean, that's, that's exactly true. And, and that, those have been very effective. I mean, some of the videos more, more than others, but some of the videos have gone, have gone viral. and now it's about how to crank this stuff out quickly. Part of what I've developed here is we review all of the ads for all of the candidates. So we've analyzed like 6 ,000 ads and figured out what the top issues are. And then I feed that into a thing to create music videos. So it's still, I mean, it's not real time, but I mean, it's a few hours, right? Well, I mean, to be able to turn that around that quickly is going

to be an important part of getting this out. And so the national mood is souring on Trump. And again, the reason this is important is that the messaging here in all eight states is to tie the Republican to Trump and then contrast that with our candidates. And our candidates are six libertarians, one Constitution Party, and one National Taxpayer Party, which is essentially the same as the Constitution Party. So the education of it is, it's like, yeah, this guy voted for tariffs, This guy is against tariffs and is for free markets. This person was one of the 50 that decided to keep the Iran

war going. This person's anti -war. All of our candidates are anti -war. All of our candidates are pro -free markets. So all of these top issues that the voters are concerned about, it just so happens our candidates are on the right side of those issues. But no one has heard of any of our candidates. I'll tell you how bad this is in terms of the asymmetry. We have eight candidates that we're supporting. Those eight candidates have raised $166 ,000 combined. The other candidates have raised $293 million. And so what I've been trying to explain to people is the power. We have the ability with little money to, we could double the results of some of these candidates

Because literally no one's heard of a lot of these candidates. Even in New Hampshire, Ed Laplante, 87 % have never heard of him in a recent poll. So this is good news. I think this strategy— They don't need to hear of the candidates. They need to hear of you, of your project. They're supporting a project. The candidates—see, one thing that I have a problem— I've been Libertarian Rumpur National Chair a bunch of times, I'm trying to get them to embrace principle, you know, to quit worrying about how many votes you get and change America up here. It's a revolution between the

ears. No matter how many times I can demonstrate it, it doesn't seem to matter because what do they do? I'm running to win. I'm running to win. If you're running to win. The stock kicker thing on the screen, you know, well, you're not going to win, likely. I mean, you know, that's not the point. It's to win hearts and minds. It's to win general public opinion. It's to win a shift in what you expect from the government to hold them accountable to the promise of the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights. you that is the win that is man i i get i get triggered on this stuff every time but when they're going for the

votes you know i'm doing the win well then they make deals you know they kind of soften on this they don't i mean even the national party was telling us in arizona well don't talk about drugs and guns shit it's arizona are you kidding me it's gonna be drugs Drugs and guns, guns and weed, guns and weed. And we do better. And the reason is, was not because of the electorate. It was because of their donors. It was how they controlled the Libertarian Party was the national level of money came from wherever. And that's how they controlled policy. It was so obvious to us here in Arizona. And we just wanted to be left alone. The

only reason we got involved in national is because it kept coming after us. We're going, look, you guys really went. So there's a whole bunch of story behind that. So what you're doing, name recognition for the individual candidates, I think is, you know, cool. You can do that, whatever. It's not a mistake. But the lead candidate is your program. It's part of what we're doing to take it and make sure they're accountable. When they see these eight candidates, these six, seven, eight states that you're doing and why you're doing it, now they're part of something that's going to make a difference.

They're part of something that's going to change. And they're part of something that they know or can know who Aaron Day is and why he's doing it and what the reasons are. That's the power. Not because there's going to be any one of these candidates are going to come. Well, you know, some of that, you know, a couple of million dollars you got there, a little something, something for the whole team here. We've got and pay more campaign managers and stuff. I know how this stuff goes. You know, well, to be clear, I can't talk to the candidates at all. And I'm not giving the candidates any money. The money that we're spending is all my messaging. In fact, I mean, this is the thing that people

don't know about politics. I can say shit that the candidates don't even agree with. But and there's nobody can really do anything about it. Now, of course, I pick these candidates because they are aligned on all of these issues. So, I mean, I'm taking their stated public positions. I'm not misrepresenting anything that they're doing, although people do do that. And that actually, I had an outside group do flyers when I ran for U .S. Senate that they did accurately present my position. But nevertheless, I am taking their critical positions and I'm amplifying the position. I'm not giving the

candidates any money. There are no deals. There are absolutely no deals. in fact i don't even know i mean i'm assuming at this point these candidates know that we're doing this but i i literally am not even allowed to reach out to them so um we completely control the message there's no deals it's it's just and some of them don't yeah i know one of the candidates i've learned doesn't want any negativity in the race and it's like well you know she's in south carolina i'm like i got bad news for you we're gonna point out Darline Graham on you know war and all variety of other issues. Isn't that Lindsey Graham's daughter or something? Lindsey Graham's sister. And I mean,

you know, these situations just, and you follow that money and it's like funded Elon Musk and just all of these just horrible people are backing this. And she went on a debate and said, well, I don't know much about foreign policy, but I trust Trump. That was her explanation for why she voted. Wait, Elon Musk is supporting Graham? him? Elon Musk has put $236 million into PACs that support these candidates. Elon Musk is the largest contributor. In fact, if you think George Soros, Elon Musk is what people fear George Soros is. And his money is everywhere. And his reason is what? He wants to get a NASA contract or

something? I mean, you know, the Marines need starships. I mean, what is his motivation? Well, yeah, I mean, this is most of his wealth. I was glad to see Hans Hermann Hoppe actually do some come out in an interview recently and highlight the fact that, you know, Elon Musk made his money off of these government contracts. And he also was was, you know, nice enough to point out, you know, Peter Thiel and Palantir. Yeah, Musk needs these government contracts. And obviously, some people didn't like Doge, not because it saved anybody any money. Did you get your dividend check from Doge, by the way? Speaking of the $5 ,000. $5 ,000! Yeah, how's the Doge check? Is

the budget balanced yet? But, you know, so his whole thing is based on government contracts or the need to... X is all over the government now. His AI company is working with the defense contractors. And so, I mean, the government's his biggest customer and biggest funding source. So this is just a cost of doing business now for Elon. And he's not saying anything about it publicly. In fact, it was just I hadn't even been following it until, you know, doing this PAC. And it's like, oh, yep, turns out he's the largest contributor. And he's and so he's funding and the Senate is one of his things. And the irony of

this is he moves from California to Texas. And one of the biggest train wrecks for the Republicans right now is Texas. It's possible that the governor and the senator, that the state goes blue, which no one was thinking about. It was like a plus 14 state two years ago. Because California moved to Austin. That's what happened. That's exactly what happened. Exactly what happened. The people that work with, they're all liberals. And it's just like this is one of the things I worry about with New Hampshire, where people are like, you know, oh, yeah, let's let's have, you know, Massachusetts biotech move to New Hampshire. Yeah, that'll go well. Right. Like that's not good. That's that's not going

to end well politically. It's amazing what New Hampshire has been able to do by the injection of the libertarian freedom oriented infection into the bone marrow of politics for which there's no cure. You know, you're surrounded by, you know, Vermont. Oh, my God. Bernie Sanders. You have, you know, Massachusetts. Oh, my God. Massachusetts. You know, I don't know how liberal Maine is pretty liberal, but New Hampshire is sitting there going, damn, live free or die state, which they keep trying to change that slogan. You know, this has been like such a great testament to the people like yourself that move there to be free and take

this seriously. And it was just by being a good neighbor is where a lot of it came in. You know, you sponsor the little league team. I mean, you know, freedom's answer. What's the question on, you know, freaking billboards? I mean, it's just the by osmosis. You have this effect. It's been very encouraging, but the more power that you get in that way, then there's people want to jump in front of the parade and got their shiny badge and give me money. I got other plan. I mean, always that always happens, but it demonstrates the power of persuasion, the power of being involved, the power of engagement, the power of social interaction, the power of being a good neighbor and rule one, don't be

a dick. That is so simple. And you go there, you do that. Well, you start spreading that around the country with what you're doing and the reasons for it. You give people a reason to participate in what you're doing. It's not about the individual candidates. It can't be. They don't know them, you know, but if they got good rhetoric and are for freedom oriented and you're taking this StarkFreedom thing, tell the people what, why you call it StarkFreedom. What's stark? Well, Stark is General John Stark, revolutionary war hero who, you know, won some strategic battle and so on and so forth. But he's famous for his statement,

live free or die, death is not the worst of evils, which is live free or die is the slogan for the state of New Hampshire. And so, so yeah, that's StarkFreedom. It's a nod to him. And I started a super PAC in 2014 called Stark 360. So this is kind of a, you know, the successor to that. that but i love the name and obviously i love what what that represents and that's that's the message that we're this is a live free or die message um but being done strategically through these through these senate races and yeah but you can't even talk to the candidates anyway so it's StarkFreedom StarkFreedom StarkFreedom StarkFreedom and your ads are you

focusing just on the candidate and their name recognition and that or are you marrying it with StarkFreedom I mean, Stark, so if you click on the ads, it goes to StarkFreedom page. So, but the most of the ads, though, are about, you know, here's how Trump lied. And here's the specific candidate, Republican candidate, by the way, because I'm specifically sniping the Republican. And then here's where our candidate stands on that issue. So it's not just, you know, name ID. It's not just here's the guy. Here's the guy based on his position. So we are we are promoting his pro -liberty positions as

a contrast to Trump and the Republican counterpart. But, yeah, if you click through, it clicks through to start to StarkFreedom. OK, you're starting to get some coverage we had on freedomsphoenix .com, our new site. The article was a Sam for I'm not sure who that is, but, you know, we certainly put that up. Are you getting any more local coverage? Is there some media or if there is, there are going to be. I mean, here it comes. Well, so the Semafor thing is actually a pretty big deal. Semafor was started by a guy that was – one guy who was the former CEO of one of the Bloomberg things, and then the CEO of BuzzFeed got together. So this is like a hoity -toity population

that people in D .C. read and Fortune 500 CEO companies read, probably more left -leaning, but obviously it's not a mass market thing. I have I've got part of the AI system that I have Is we detect whenever there's a news story About one of the races That our candidates are in It automatically emails the reporter Based on whatever the context is To interject here's StarkFreedom Usually it's hey you didn't talk About the third party candidate Here's this so on and so forth So I'm doing increasingly more Local media Interviews across the country I did one in Kansas last week and more coming up. Interestingly,

New Hampshire has been silent. New Hampshire covered me when I was losing cases here in New Hampshire, some of the earlier steps. And then I won and then I didn't put my name forward on the ballot. No one's covered it since in New Hampshire. It will come, though. I mean, you can't avoid it at some point in time. So, yeah, we issue press releases. We put out a press release over Newswire, and it's gotten picked up on Yahoo and some other things. Who's we? Your 487 agents? Yeah, we is me. And this thing that I built, again, it's exhausting. And one of the hard things is, if you actually saw, I have like

18 windows that are programming different aspects of this. And so there's a whole system. them. But I can't wait until this is done. Because if people don't believe what's going on now, you'll believe it after the fact. And then it'll be fun to show people how this worked. Because there's definitely a full plan for PR and for getting the word out, including doing ads. I've been targeting DC pretty heavily with ads about the PAC. I have some of these. I think when you had me on, I think we played part of the opera song. We have four versions of our theme song. I am blanketing DC with that because I want DC to know what this is about

first. That was kind of the opening remark. But then, obviously, we're targeting the individual states. And so people were going to hear about this. And obviously, every day they will try. This is one other comment I wanted to make is that it levels the playing field in communication between ideologies. You know, they then those don't have any really credibility. It's just repetition and money and just beating the crap out of you and scaring you and you're all going to die if you don't take the shot or something. So this is how they work. It's just money, money, money, money and a little election fraud, you know, and stuff. But the point that you're

making is that it's decentralized the power down to an individual that took the time, the hundreds, thousands of hours to learn AI and how to be creative with the truth. Because they're going to do it by the 28 election cycle. I guarantee they're going to come up with all kinds of AI bots of whatever. ever, but they don't have the human creativity and the principles to make it something somebody wants to watch, or it's just lies. I'll give you an example. In 2002, well, it was like 1996, we're running campaigns. We made use of the internet. We're creating webpages on dial -up, you know, I mean, you know, it's slow. You can't even load up a graphic, but the

media was very very appreciative of our libertarian full slate mayor and four council members for Phoenix, because we had every one of their, their platform, what their ideology was, everything very clear. Reporters like that, man. Cool. Thank you for playing. Well, of course the other guys, they, you know, bamboozled and BS and, and changed depending on who they talk to. They go front page, libertarian, first online candidates. They made a big deal out of it. It wasn't until 2002 in the governor race. I think it was, I'm pretty sure it was 2002. The gubernatorial race here to where all of the gubernatorial candidates finally had a

webpage. Matt Salmon was a congressman that used to be a state legislator. And he was a congressman, came back to Arizona. I knew him. I knew him pretty well. We talked and yeah, long story, but he comes back. back, bells and whistle webpage. It had everything, except what the hell he stood for. I mean, it was all distraction bullshit and endorsements and this and charts and polling. Yeah, well, where's the meat? Where's the meat? Well, there wasn't any. And eventually he lost because of a Second Amendment thing he kind of weenied out on. Boom, that was the difference. And of course, we had our libertarian candidate, Barry Hess, there. So what happened was since 02,

they all come in with Web pages. They got all their, you know, social media. Now it's bots and, you know, yada, yada, yada. But it's all void of any principle or anything that appeals to the people in a dire situation. The economy is we're at war and all this other stuff. up. So by 28, they're going to be coming to you, Aaron. These guys are going to go, well, make some money. Got some money for you. Well, we need you to get us learnified on this. Or of course, they'll figure it out themselves and pay some 14 -year -old, you know, like they always do. They go to, you know, DEFCON and they, you know, pick out the

13 -year -olds and now he's working for the FBI hacking. I mean, you know, that's just how they do it. So now they're going to be coming in, end, getting all these people to do what you're doing for the political parties in the 28 cycle. But what they're going to miss is the same thing. It's going to be pablum. It's going to be BS. It's always negative marketing. The bad guy, look at him. He got, you know, pictures with his shirt off. I mean, just stupid stuff that doesn't matter. That's where the freedom -oriented philosophy and the technology that you're taking advantage of is going to explode on them. They can't compete with the freedom ideology and the

promise of the founders and the Constitution, Declaration of Independence, and Bill of Rights. They cannot because they don't know how. That's not who they serve. The people are going to benefit not just from the example that you're doing in this election it's going to be 28 and the ground rule is going to be totally different it's going to be individuals with the power we'll see what happens that's why i'm so excited about what you're doing i'm thinking into the future because i've seen this play out before when you have you know the cant on radio i just had charles go young on yesterday he just uh had new york time best -selling author he got the empire lies just came out he did the dollar

meltdown back during the ron paul evolution got translated into korean and freaking chinese detailing what's coming and that thing holds up well what happened here in arizona i was producer and i had a show in same station and we're you know kicking butt and so on they bought that station like three times what it was worth because McCain was running for president in the 08 election cycle and they didn't want us up there going out, especially after I ran against him in 04 for U .S. Senate. What you're doing, I keep giving these examples because it is the power of the equality of access to To

minds, how many minds can you free? So how many votes? That's a side effect. That's downstream. You have to have people realize resistance is not futile. And by having a coordinated effort that you're doing, that effort is the candidate. You know, these individual candidates, cool, leave that up to them. But you are the candidate. it and they built and made you because they pissed you off and i'm on your side man peace well i you know i will say they're obviously very sophisticated on this as well because remember we're really fighting here the technocrats it is elon musk and peter teal that are the ones pulling the strings on the other end and one of the challenges

is and this is part of the learning experience for me is you know for me to get my message out i've got to buy ads to be able to because I'm shadow banned. I mean, otherwise, people... I could produce all the great stuff in the world and eight people will see it because of the way these platforms work. And I will say one thing interesting. So I've created all these ads, like, I don't know, almost 100 of them. And I'm doing really low -cost tests just to see how it works. But X, as an example, will not allow me to put a picture of Iran. Iran, any part of the Iran war conflict. And I can't put any pictures of war. I can't put any pictures of Jeffrey Epstein.

And I can't put the picture of Howard Lutnick on Epstein's island. It gets flagged. I literally can't get the - Flagged by what? It gets flagged by X as something that they will not allow to be promoted. And their reasoning is what? That it violates their terms of service. And it doesn't have a particularly compelling, you appeal it, and then if you read the terms of service of X, they can do this, right? Obviously, as we've been talking about with these things, but there isn't a good explanation of it. There is no good explanation of why I can't put the picture of Epstein and Lutnick on the island together. That is a public domain that was released as part of the DOJ. It's not a

deep fake. It's not made up. It's public information. and they won't let me. So what will be interesting throughout this process is testing how much truth there will allow in these materials. Well, they say you got freedom of speech, but not reach, and now you don't even get freedom of speech for it. I mean, you can't even put it up there. I find that disheartening. You can't even buy reach. And what's interesting is that the same guy, Musk, is putting $236 million in the campaign. pain. So this may be one of the things that I end up learning about this is to be able to explain what's actually going on with these

tech platforms in terms of our ability to get the truth out there and how absolutely censored it is, but in this soft way where it's not all or nothing. It's just, yeah, you can buy ads, but you just can't buy those ads. Don't talk about the war. Don't talk about financial fraud. Don't talk about Howard Luton being - What are the other issues that you're you're limited by well those are the only ones i've been limited by so far but i've been primarily yeah epstein war that's it epstein Lutnick and war i mean i can talk about the war i just can't show you can't show actual pictures of the war i mean so part of this for me is i mean there's like people are dying we're blowing up you

know school children in iran i mean you know this is that's an important thing message. Can you put war picture censored by X in the frame? I might be able to do that. I mean, that's something to consider, but some of the music videos that I have, some of the music videos that I have, obviously I'm trying to show what's actually going on here. This is why... Censored by X, censored by X. Hell, X could be the opposition. Censored by X, censored by that. Make them pay, man! Get some! Exactly. So there's learning with all of it. And all of that will come out to whoever I can

get the information in front of. But yeah, as far as I can tell, looking at these packs, this is pretty cutting edge what's going on here. I'm sure by 2028, everybody will be doing it. But for this cycle, this is a real window of opportunity to break out and really hammer on very important issues. And again, like I said, yeah, it's not about the candidates, but the good news is all of these candidates, for instance, are against the surveillance state. And they're on the right on all of the issues. All of these candidates are on the right side. So it's easy to talk about what's going on with surveillance

when you're contrasting what Trump is doing and then inevitably what the Republican is going along with. Are you able to do the surveillance issue on X? Yes, so far. but I mean remember I've got a lot of different ads and I'm trying to push the boundaries as much as I can I mean the good news is I'm using my own AI which is uncensored because most people probably couldn't even generate the videos to be with so I'm at least able to get the videos out and produce them but we'll see we'll see what happens but I have several focusing on this because because the republic I mean you know whatever all the I will say that in addition to Trump Trump pushing technocracy and

corruption at unprecedented levels, it does so happen to turn out that the Republican candidates are horrible. And for their own specific reasons that they're horrible, like Johnny Sununu voting for the TARP bailout and the Patriot Act and everything else. But this is a particularly bad crop of Republicans. So it's good to get these issues out there. And again, it's like a big cure curated. I mean, they've been molded. It's been baking the cake, man. It hasn't been grilled. We're going to get a really nasty recipe. You know, one of the things that was just a recent article we were talking about today, a couple of days ago, I saw PewDiePie. I don't know if you remember

PewDiePie. You know, PewDiePie was a gamer guy and they went after him. Basically, he had like 60 million followers or subscribers on YouTube. And he wasn't getting with the program. He wasn't doing what they wanted him to do. Well, then we're going to cancel. Screw you. I'll go over here. and then he gets up to 100 and whatever million. So what does he do? He gets banned by OpenAI or ChatGPT or whatever. He gets banned. Why? He was using that to build some of his own OpenAI system. Well, this is, you know, and he built it and he gets open source and anybody can go and bite me. That's what they don't like. They don't want people to have access to the kind of stuff that

you're doing. they fear that more than anything else so then what does the tech bros do we we got to be regulated so we need some regulation we would be a feared man oh my god we're all going to die so we need to be regulated and eliminate competition what you're doing i guarantee there's going to be some effort to make it illegal you're not allowed and you don't think so just today, I saw an article will be on Phoenix later, is that the Chinese government is giving digital IDs to AI avatar characters. They're going to regulate you, you know. It's such a

constant battle between good and evil. But you've got to define evil. Evil won't leave you alone. own. I don't know how else to put it. They're going to take your money, steal your stuff, you know, draft your children in some war, you know, educate them and indoctrinate them with the narrative that they want. And it's just so bad. I apologize for taking up so much time, but I want people to understand from my perspective, why, from my experience of decades of doing this, how important it is what you're doing, how you're doing it, the tools that you have, you are breaking new ground. And the quality of your videos, music videos are OMG. You

know that they, even if they got access, of course, they're doing their own AI thing. To say what? War is good? You know, it's worth a little bit more paying diesel because it's worth it because trump said you know what i'll give you five thousand dollars if you vote for i mean what the hell are they gonna say i'm with you brother you keep going um yeah well so that's i mean that's a very good point um i you have the the way that they're you know analyzing these ads you're exactly right they've got a a very for a format for these negative ads and it's all there's not a single idea being discussed

and it's usually usually just personal attacks about stuff like, oh, this guy was mean to his Uber driver or whatever. I mean, you know, it's so, but they are already trying to regulate. I have to, you know, so one of the things that I built, and I'm grateful that I have AI to do this, is something that does compliance because the campaign finance stuff, I have to comply with the finance laws and you get into, that's a quick way to get into trouble. So each state has their own laws with AI. So you'll see some of these music videos and I, you know, I can't do anything that actually looks like the

person. I've got to create something that looks like a drawing of the person. It's like Michigan and Minnesota are worse than the other states. They already have this stuff on the books, quote, to prevent deep fakes. But honestly, this is just going to be another form of censorship. So anyway, going through these races, we're not going to go through all the detail here. here, but the bottom line, I'm putting this up as a scorecard of, all right, you know, what's the floor? How have the independent candidates and third party candidates done in the past? And then, you know, where are they before StarkFreedom and then after? And, you know, it's meaningless

so far because we haven't spent that much money or gotten much reach yet. But this is how I'm going to try to measure this because I do, to your point, I want to be able to show coming out of this that we have the ability to use third parties to hold these people accountable. And I want to be able to prove that. And that is a tool that we're going to need because, you know, they're not going away anytime soon. You know, I would have to go through all the details here. I mean, Hispanics are leaving. I mean, there's the demographics and what what Trump is losing here is mind boggling. I mean, again, the fact that Texas is is in play is amazing. But

then you look at the issues. OK, so this is important stuff. So what's going on with Texas? Well, it's prices, gas, gas in the war. And by the way, that's generally the case for all of these states. Some of the states data centers are an issue closer to the top of the list. But these are big issues in every single state. I mean, in other words, Trump has failed on all of the stuff that he ran on. He ran on gas being, you know, half electricity behalf in 12 months. he ran on no new wars and he ran on he the golden the golden age who's talking about the golden age

um so that's the issue we're winning even when you're losing you're winning we're winning winning we go too much winning make me stop winning because you don't like winning yeah so so that so those are the issues in texas and so we're supporting you know you probably you may know some of these guys better than i do actually i haven't met the do you know ted brown no all All right. Ted Brown's a libertarian running in Texas. He got a quarter of a million votes. He ran for this in 2024. So he's actually got a decent, decent following. So we'll see what happens there. um you know again i'm not going to go through all the detail here but i but i'm showing kind of

where third parties have been in general and you know frankly your numbers in arizona are higher than any of the numbers that i have for any of the eight states that we're in and i'll tell you why so why so so principal it was a hardcore street activism made signs we opened up a workshop we had dozens and dozens of libertarian supporters there painting signs making signs learning the silk screen we had our own printing press we had i raised i became county chair in um December of 93. And I'm going, who's in? I, you know, by then I'd already had my lawsuit going against

the state as an independent, whatever. And I'm going, who's in? Well, a lot of guys go, man, this is what we've been waiting for, man. Let's go whip some ass. So we raised $10 ,000 with a Liberty rifle raffle, you know, and what we did is we raffled off and AR 15, SKS and AK raised a bunch of money and the drawing, were done April 15th at the post office, people dropping off their tax checks by a city councilwoman, Frances Barwood from Phoenix, and Sheriff Richard Mack, you know, and one of our guys. And we made a big, and then the press goes, well, don't you think? Yeah, I do think. I critically think. I don't think what you think. So they were always trying to gaslight you. Well, we just

embraced it. Then later we had, you know, a different kind of, you know, So rifle raffles and so on. And we raised the money. We got like $10 ,000, $12 ,000. And that paid for a workshop that where we mass produced the signs. One of the supporters bought a Navy Dick 360 printing press. We had the safe office. Second Amendment is for everyone. Are you a safe legislator? Are you an unsafe congressman? I mean, I still have that. We went after it and we were not apologetic about it. When we started doing our newspapers, we had libertarian papers and sisters taking initiative and stuff. The editorial board

at the Arizona Republic, which is the largest paper at the time, they had us come down and they wanted to make a deal. They're like a dozen editors there. Some of the photo editors, the columnists, they all they go. Look, if you pick a couple of issues. We will support not say bad things if you'll just stop mucking up our crap. OK, we will. We'll make a deal. We'll love on you a little bit on these whatever issues. And we're like, you have no idea what you're talking about. Hell, we don't even know what the issues are going to spark. We did 36 initiatives. The ones that took off was repealing a personal property tax, fully informed jury, concealed carry, education. Oh,

and one that we had when we were at, I don't know, so many trillions of dollars in debt. I think it was like $4 trillion at the time. when the national debt hits $10 trillion, Arizona secedes. Whoa, they freaked out. You know, we're going, damn. And we had a bunch of others. So it turned into us just getting up and walking out. You're going to have to, you know, ink by the barrel. And we kind of, you guys have no idea what's coming. Bite us. And we left. And it was just me and the state chair, you know, at the time, Rick Tompkins, which later ran for president in 96. well what happened was of course they attacked us by the end of the 90s they were there was like

2000 or something they go all right we're going to give them the questionnaires we're going to have them on an editorial page we're going to include all the libertarians because these are a bunch of liberals and they go so that everybody sees just how batshit crazy this freedom philosophy people are. It was awesome. Our competing candidates really said the same thing, the little nuances, the difference or whatever. And the population went, yeah, what they said. Oh my God. Whoa, we got to shut that crap down. You know this because they can't understand the power of the freedom rhetoric, even the National Libertarian

Party. You know, they'll go on about it, but what they're really doing is taking money from they, them, those to kind of tone it down a little bit or something, but not what you're doing. What you're doing is giving a principled reason of accountability for them. They're violating our rights. They're violating, you know, the oath that they're taking to support the constitution. They're violating the spirit and letter of the declaration of independence. This is a fight for, for our heritage. And if you give them a reason, it's going to be, you know, you should put, you know, the Stark PAC on, on the ballot you'd win. Which is how this is playing out.

I like that. I like that. Well said. So, I mean, I have, you know, I'm not going to go through all this stuff. I got all the breakdown of, you know, where the votes are and all that, but it's not that important to go through. No, it isn't. I appreciate all the work that you did here. This is exactly the conversation we had today on the Trump report. work. Frank was all about, you know, numbers, numbers, numbers and percentage and Trump's getting the shit kicked out of them and everybody's leaving. Even the Jews in New York are leaving and this and back and Hollywood, all that. Don't care. Don't give a crap. Don't even pay attention to the polls. I don't believe them.

I don't believe the election results. I don't believe. What I believe is in, I have faith in humanity. I have faith in people to discern the truth, to want the the truth, to support the truth. And if you give them that opportunity, the truth of why you're doing this, that's where you succeed. Because what are they going to say? Well, he's just fuller because he's just, you know, just, I have no idea what the hell they're going to say. Doesn't matter. Once you make it clear what you're doing and why, people see that as, I think it's going to be way more successful than you think. That's my opinion. Well, I

hope you're right. We obviously don't have a lot of time. This was a pretty quick turnaround to do this, but I think you might be right because people are sick of getting lied to and they're becoming aware that they're being lied to. and there is no other message. There's no message around liberty or any of these core ideas. It's certainly, it's not coming from either party. They don't even try anymore. There's not even an attempt at rhetoric. I'll tell you, I've watched some of these debates. That guy bad. Yeah, it's really bad. I mean, some of it's amusing. I actually watched the Georgia Senate debate and it was a masterclass in deflection. neither

answered a single question that they were asked they couldn't answer a yes no question it was it was just massive deflection the entire time there's nothing inspiring about any of it um i and so it's just you know so the the talent of the candidate is based on their ability to deflect from their own actions did you watch the video about pal gamble the the kind of the uh spoof video we did on his debate. I have not had time, no. You really should. And it was just whenever we get, this is what happens. The candidates get up and they'll draw straws or whatever. Who goes first? Who goes last? That kind of crap. Well, it

doesn't matter to us. No matter what place we come in, we just say, look, this guy said this. This said, I'm going to rule you this way. That person goes, no, you're going to rule you wrong. We're going to rule you better. or you need to be ruled. And the libertarian or alternative cats come, we're here to, you get your own plan, you can rule your damn self. How about that? That was the whole promise. Anytime you do that, no matter if you're at the teacher's union town hall or whatever, people clapping. Two years later, your opponent be the same thing. They're repeating what you said. Are they going to do it? Hell no. But they know the impact it has on the audience.

You have a unique, you're going to have competition. There is going to be, you do this. And the next time there's going to be a whole bunch of, you know, PACs. So we're going to, you know, use the third party alternative to control the King making thing. In fact, they do that all the time. The Republicans, they would go into a state and they would threaten the incumbent, especially this co -copus stuff. I mean, you know, they want their energy, whatever, however they want the vote or something. And if they have a comment that doesn't do it, they'll support a third party candidate, you know, to pull from them, you know, so that they get, it's a threat. They use exactly

what you're doing as a threat to get the votes that they want in Congress. It happens all the time. And for the first time that I know of on a coordinated, very planned out, very open way, Aaron Day comes to the rescue here. Aaron is to save the day with day. Okay. So this is, you know, just, so the numbers that you have here, I want to let you go through it, whiz through this here. Cause you put so much effort into it, but you know, to me, I just don't care. You know, what you're doing is the number the fact that you're doing it is the win. You already won. Boom. Yeah. Well, I, yeah. Yeah, and I think part of the reason I'm going through the numbers is just to kind of explain the

opportunity, frankly, why I think this is going to be a major impact. I believe, and I told that reporter from Semafor, I think people are going to look back at this and say this rate, this super PAC, very likely was one of the main contributors to the election outcome for control of the Senate. it. I want to say this one thing and then I'll stop and I'll let you go through all these. A lot of people didn't understand. They go, how did you know in the revolution when Ron Paul kind of announced he might have a blue ribbon panel to discuss maybe, you know, running for president in the middle of January 07.

Once I got confirmation from the guy, are you guys really going to do this? Yeah, we're going to talk to the hand, man. I want nothing to do with your Republican, whatever. I just want to keep them on that podium. That's what the revolution was about. That's what we did. And I go to the people and I went to all my contacts, a lot of politicals and everything. I said, watch this. There was not a doubt in my mind what was going to happen, just as there's not a doubt in my mind what's going to happen with your effort. I want to say this up front as confident as I was, what Ron Paul was going to change in this country. What you're doing is along the same lines

of the same impact. There I said it. Put me on record. Boom. Do your chart stuff. Well, that's certainly something to live up to. Wow. But well, so, you know, on the chart stuff, I mean, again, I go through each of these. Basically, it all says the same thing. It says that people don't like Trump. They disapprove of him. And most people have not heard of the candidate that we're supporting. And I mean, it's that simple. They try to suppress the truth by, one, making it almost impossible to get on the ballot. And then, two, making it almost impossible to get on the debate stage. and then three you don't because

you can't do those things who's going to donate to your campaign so these poor candidates i mean again they're all libertarians that are solid on all of its surveillance and you know i'm constitutional as hell i'm constant all of it every single one of them and no one's heard of them david graham is now he did pretty well i think he got four percent last time, but 80 % based on polling have literally never heard of him. Ed Laplante, 87%. This is why, and this is the power of this PAC, is that we can go in and actually help raise awareness of these people as a complete outsider. And there's no strings attached.

I'm just trying to push, as you say, the liberty issues. But this is why such little money and then the use of AI, I think people are going to be stunned about the impact of this. You know, we'll see. But I'm fairly confident. I'm not as confident as maybe you are based on your last statement. But, and again, all of this is the same. Gas prices and war. I mean, I don't even need to have separate slides. Each of these things. Now, I will say David Graham hit 7 % in one poll. Kansas hasn't had a Democrat since like 1932 in the Senate. And right now, the Democrats actually had a couple of points. And our guy is the margin on this. And at one point, polled as high as

7%. I mean, think about what message that is. Because you know what's going to happen? They're going to look into these guys after the fact. Mostly what's going to happen, one of the things I've done is I've reached out to the press, but I've reached out to all the pollsters. I did this in 2016. There's this guy, Larry Sabadaw. He has this thing called the crystal ball. He's like one of these whatever, preeminent poll guys. And I reached out to him in 2016, and I said, I saw his little map and what he was predicting, and I said, you're wrong about New Hampshire. And I said, here's why. Most of these pollsters, sometimes they don't even

poll the independent candidate. And they never talk about the results. And so I'm reaching out to all of them in advance and going on the record saying, hey, you're going to be wrong about this race for this reason. Because you're not hearing people yet talk about, oh, yeah, people are talking about that it's close, but nobody's talking about the fact that, hey, maybe it's these third party candidates that are going to be. It's so much. Let me jump in on the polling thing. What we did, we did an article for our own paper. We wanted to demonstrate how this really worked. So we called Gallup poll sales department. Okay. You don't call the PR guys. You don't

talk to the pollsters. You go to the sales department and you say, hey, we need a poll. Well, what result do you want? What questions do you have? Who do we got? We got this group of 1 ,000 people, this group of 1 ,000 people. We get whatever you want. What do you want? How much is it going to cost? It costs this much. That's how it works. Okay. You buy the poll that you want. Why do you think they even do it? And when in 94, I'm a nobody, nothing libertarian kid in like 32 or something, you know, whatever it was back then. And I'm running for secretary of state. We're hitting it hard. I ran against the Republican, which was the

speaker of the House, the Democrat, which was the president of the Senate. And I got 8%. So I'm just I'm going, you know, hello. I so don't care about all the stuff. Doesn't matter. It's the principle. It's the inspiration. It's the passion. It's the clarity and what you're doing. So I'm sorry. I just want to put that in. No, I hear you. And the polling is, you know, obviously the one thing that is interesting about the polling, though, is that Republican and Democrat pollsters are actually coming up with some of the same results with respect. Yesterday, I didn't watch it, but, you know, I heard about it. Fox News even came out with Trump

is at a 32 percent approval rating and where he stands on these issues. I mean, you know, usually the people that, you know, are paid to make stuff look good, they're converging on a story here, which is whether the numbers are entirely correct or not. That's probably not rocket science to say when the economy sucks and you're at a war you're not supposed to be in. And people watch corruption at a mass scale. Meme coins, stable coins. You know, this Kimberly Guilfoyle in Greece or whatever, taking $100 ,000 donations. nations and you know i just it's it's it's rampant it's blatant and it's in your face so

you don't need a poll to to tell you that people are looking at that and saying i'm not i'm not happy with it but you don't have to vote for the democrat you don't have to vote you know get into this oh well you know we're gonna have socialism vote for what you actually want right you're not throwing away your vote voting for uh david graham in in kansas he's a hardcore core limited government pro -constitution guy all of these again all of these candidates are like create a block of vote and then get it and my message is vote for that explicitly vote for that not you know and

i'm i'll jump well we're going to get to new hampshire because there's news today in new hampshire you do you go go ahead and go out we'll take a look at your graphs but but again kansas you know i think david graham already it's a you know whatever you believe the polls are not Now, Dems up one by one point, and David Graham is at three points. So this is a, we get the message out about David Graham, David goes from 3 % to 4 % or 5%. That's the difference. That's it. That's the whole ballgame. And by the way, when I did this in 2016, it was the most expensive U .S. Senate race per capita in the history of the United States. And it was the closest Senate race the entire year.

This stuff matters that much. And I was pulling at 4%. They didn't know that I didn't put my name on the ballot. Apparently, Rasmussen was following the fact that the lawsuit's enough to include me in a poll. I was pulling at 4%. I mean, I didn't do any, which is twice the percentage of where Ed's at right now. It's because I piss a lot of people off, but there's enough people that know what I stand for on these issues over the years where there is a built -in amount of support for that. There really is. And it's just making people aware of some of this. So I'm not going to go into this. You know, one personal thing. I

want to know how supportive. You have to have support at home. Is your wife down with this? Is she going to go get some? Oh, yeah. I mean, she's part of it. She's the co -founder of it. But her political background is she was involved and started the medical choice vaccine choice group in 2006. 2006, like way before everybody else here in New Hampshire, trying to get medical exemptions and pushing stuff like two decades before people are now talking about it, and then became the chair of the NHLA for two terms. And while she was chair, they actually reduced the size of government by 11 .5%. Actually reduced the size. They're not doing

today, New Hampshire, with all of these so -called freestaters or whatever in office. They're increasing the budget. The percentage of the New Hampshire budget that comes from the federal government has increased. So when she was there, and then she ran for state senate, and she's been along on – she's a partner on all of this stuff. So, yeah, this is – Very important. Yeah, couldn't do that otherwise because, you know, I can't even imagine. I mean, imagine having a spouse. This is pretty out there stuff to be doing to begin with. Right. And then – but, yeah, no, she's – I told her when we got married. It'll always be interesting. And I have lived up to that.

This has been a... One thing I promised my wife, I said, it won't be boring. Yeah. And this year has been kind of like the way over the top version of it. I mean, last time, she was there in 2016 when I did all of this and then got into this lawsuit. I mean, she was directly involved in that whole scenario. So she's been through all of the aspects of this. Good and bad, because by the way, when you do stuff like this, they really don't like it. I actually think part of it is they didn't think that I would run again, because I spent five and a half years in these lawsuits. It was literally

2016 when I did this, five and a half years in lawsuits, and I think that they thought, he's not going to do that again. Well, surprise, we're going to take what we did then, and we're going to 8X it. We're going to do it across the country. Good luck. Say hello to my little effort. Yeah, exactly. You know, what are you going to do? Sue me for money? I don't even care. It doesn't, doesn't matter. So good luck. And then, and then if you sue me this time, I'm going to represent myself in court. So, uh, you know, I, I look so forward to, I mean, you know, there's one thing, you know, um, you know, it's like playing chess with a three -year -old, you know, it's easy to beat them.

you're playing with government and you're just kind of but but all of a sudden they stand up on the chair knock all the pieces on the floor and put three 45 slugs in your chest i mean you know they they don't play by the rules man you know you got to always be cognizant of you know they they don't like when you're beating them up you know and they'll do whatever they got to do so just saying oh they will but you know i've learned that there's no point in having fear Fear will kill this. If you could not have fear, I should probably be more afraid maybe than I am, but I'm just like, you know what? We've got to push faster. My answer is always, well, what if this happens? My

response is bigger, faster. That's kind of where I come out on it. They create a whole bunch of errand days. They take you on, man. That would be a bad idea. Yeah. So it's, you know, whatever. It's fun stuff. stuff. Iowa, again, there's some difference, price tariffs and the farm. What's interesting is just watching Trump where he goes places and he gets booed. I've watched some of these debates of these candidates. In Kansas, the Democrat, the Republican incumbent was just getting booed. People are not buying the tariffs. Trump's actively trying to gaslight people into claiming that these tariffs saved money and saved jobs. No one believes that because people live

in the world and live with the consequences of this stuff. So yeah, diesel prices, they can't even plant. No, they can't. Six dollar plus diesel. So Iowa is really big on number one issue, cost of living and then the retaliation against Iowa farm goods. And so, again, the top issues are all, you know, kind of anti -Trump policies. And Iowa was a pretty solid solid state. And so anyway, the candidate that we have there is a libertarian prosecutor who's great. A very dynamic guy. And he's been out on a lot of these issues and obviously opposing the tariffs, opposing government intervention at all levels. And he is a prosecutor. So I really like this

guy, Thomas Laehn. And so we'll see how he does in the polls. I mean, some of these races, there's not a lot of polling. And so he's at about 2%. So, I mean, you know, generally it's like 2%. If you're doing Ernie numbers, if you're 7%, 8%, you're like, that's unprecedented. But, you know, those kind of numbers could happen this cycle in multiple of these races. You know, those numbers were not supported by National or whatever. They didn't see it that way because they were having to make make excuses for what we were saying, which was libertarian. You know, they were getting their money from, you know, Wall Street and big donors that had another mission.

So it was not, you know, especially with this, when I went up against John McCain, I got, I don't know, three, four percent, four and a half, something like that. And they go, we want you to come talk to our convention in the state of fill in the blank. You know, how did you do that? Told people not vote. boat never mind it's all good you can stay home it's a popular issue man yep yep indeed so uh yeah i'm not gonna go into the maps the maps really don't matter that much i anyway i it's important for me because i've got to figure out where to get target these messages so this is

why i'm knowing this stuff because i'm trying to figure out where to yeah no it's good you know for a post -mortem but how are you targeting what are you what ads are you buying where how how do you determine it this is a campaign that we're doing um uh in january for a newspaper we're launching and i'm very interested in how you do this i got people working on it now uh it depends on the platform so i mean we're we are doing online only so it's it's uh you know x it's rumble it's uh google and youtube and facebook and each platform has their own rules for targeting i mean some can

get to the point where if you have an email list you can actually target the email list we're doing so we are doing geographic targeting um and so we're trying to you know target but and again i'm you know i'm prioritizing going after disaffected Republicans, right? People that, because, I mean, again, this is, I'm sending a message. I'm trying to hold Trump accountable. So... How are you identifying them? You can identify... How is that secret? I don't want to, you know, blow some secrets, but, you know. You do it based on a combination of geo -targeting. This is why these maps are somewhat important, because you can actually see where third -party votes have come from, where the Republican

votes are. For instance, I can see, this will come up in Michigan, where Trump... There's a guy, Mike Rogers, running. And so you can see where in 2024 did Trump outperform this guy, right? So some of the analysis varies by state, but then you can also target people based on issues. I mean, obviously, if I'm going to target people that like Thomas Massey in all of these states, because that's going to be a threat, right? People are pissed off about what happened to Massey. So if I can target, you know, so a lot of it depends on which platform I'm using and then what they allow me to target. And then is there a big enough population? Because sometimes, all right,

yeah, you know, you want to target based on this issue in this place. And it's like there aren't enough people to even put out an ad. So a lot of this is trial and error in going through and figuring out what's available. Okay, they see the ad. They're interested. They click on the ad. there's a QR code. It goes back because if they want to forward that ad, how do they do that? If you're on a Rumble or YouTube, I'm going, oh, I definitely want to send that to start. How do they get access to it? Yeah. I mean, that's a more difficult one, but it goes to a, and this is what I'm playing around with now. I'm having different landing pages based on the ad and we we have pages for each race,

and then that page has all of the ads for that particular candidate. No, that's fine. That's good. However, part of this is, I mean, one of the things that I do like about X and Facebook is you can get a little chat going, right? The thing with X is people can share and retweet your ad. So part of the appeal to this is I'm trying to figure out how to write the ads. In addition to the video, I'm trying to figure out how to write the ads in a way where it gets people debating. I had one ad where it's like, I said, I just paid 4 .45 a gallon for gas. How much did you pay? And that actually, that

ad did better than anything else so far because a bunch of people are chiming in on how much they paid for gas. And then all of a sudden, a whole bunch of people are having conversations and then people are retweeting it. So long story short, I'm doing a lot of trial and error. And in fact, that's one of the big pieces that I've been building is kind of a dashboard for it of, all right, how is this working? And then I'll put out an ad and then cut these ads. This is why I'm creating a whole bunch of them. This worked, this didn't, and then the ones that work, we put more money behind.

But I do like the X. I would like to get conversations going. Because I remember, independent of doing these ads, back before I was shadow banned on X, I did this podcast on Ohio and technocracy. And I had this Craig Wenkowitz on who lives in Ohio and knows a lot about technocracy. And we went through how bad technocracy is in Ohio, meaning like, you know, Les Wexner, who was the primary funding source of Jeffrey Epstein, bought New Albany, Ohio. It's a company town, made Jeffrey Epstein the president of the company town. And it's now the main place where the AI data centers are. So we went, so we did this episode where we broke down like, I mean, I mean, in Ohio,

drones and programs where you can snitch on your neighbor using a mobile phone and license plate. Like, it's just awful. And it's, by the way, it's the center where J .D. Vance is, where Vivek is. Those guys are the technocrats. Well, we took this episode, and then I did a post summarizing what we learned from the episode. And it went viral to the point where the gubernatorial candidate was commenting, the CEO of Andral. We had all these politicians on there. People that lived in the state were complaining. Like, I didn't know we had this much surveillance. I want to try to get, I would love to be able to try to get that kind of engagement on these issues

on X. In particular, X, because you can have those kinds of conversations. You can do that on Facebook as well. YouTube and Rumble, it's less interactive in that regard. I mean, yeah, there are comments, but I actually think that post and that podcast had a lot to do, had something to do with the fact that now data centers are the number one issue in Ohio. Because, I mean, the data center situation there, it turns out that Governor John Kasich put in place all of these tax subsidies and didn't tell anybody about it. But now people are finding out years later that Amazon has like a $4 billion, whatever it is, like billions of dollars of tax credits and no one knew.

And now people are pissed off about it. And so anyway, part of why when I'm going through these states and talking about what the issues are, when I craft the ads, I'm like, okay, this is what people are concerned about. How do we take that issue? Like, for instance, with data centers, what I like about data centers or flock cameras is that's one issue that can be used to broaden people's perspective to understand, oh, yeah, you like that issue. That issue is tied to technocracy. This is a political ideology that you're not aware of. For a global system of digital control, these are like hook points. Dumb man. I love like I actually this is why I love playing around with this stuff

because I'm like man because look I I've gone out and you know and I've done a lot of stuff with Patrick Wood as well and trying to get people and it's brilliant information but it's hard to get people to get engaged but but once you turn it into hey this flock camera your your name is in it your name is on this list you're in this database or here's the AI data center in your area and here's how it's affected. Now people are starting to wake up. So long story short, I'm trying to figure out how to do this in all these different eight states. And I'm learning a lot about these different eight states. I know you are. I'm going to pick your brain big

time. You know, we got after the election, you know, we're going to be best friends. You know, Patrick would give him some props. He wrote in the late seventies, it was a trilateralist over Washington. You're freaking tinfoil hat nut job. If you say trilateral commission or all that kind of stuff, It was all true. Then he starts a Web site, you know, after. Well, in fact, we, you know, reintroduced him to the world because I was introduced to him by a state senator here. You need to meet Patrick Wood and who I go. Well, I've heard all this conspiracy. He's the guy. Oh, my God. Well, he just kind of retired. Just

kind of, you know, man, I did my bit. I'm good. Well, then he started up a Web site called Technocracy dot news. news. He and I have done Smart City. Bill Gates is building down I -10 here, about 70 miles west of Phoenix, out in the middle of the desert. We're building out here. Well, a third of the way towards Phoenix is Belmont, which is Bill Gates' Smart City. Plug you in the back of the head, Matrix, where's your vaccine passport place? Next door is going a theme park, a film theme park, Universal Studio type, whatever the heck it is, going out here that they're putting next door to it. Both of them include big data

centers. That's just cover for data centers. Here come the data centers. Because why? It's just a few miles north of Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant with all the transmission lines. And out here in the middle of the desert, they can't build enough solar fields fast enough. Here it comes. I got out as far as I could. I'm at the end of the cow trail. Took me four months just to be able to do the roads of my tractor to bring my bus out here that I live in, the love bus, for us doing our build. It's out in the middle of, and here it comes, technocracy. Just saying. Well, Patrick Wood and I have done, you know, various different things. And one of the things that

they came up with is they get the three -legged stool. They want academia. academia they want political leaders politicians and business so it's intel and microsoft and you know whatever they come together and here at arizona state university the head guy the guy michael crow and what was he in qtel cia man it's all this has been going on for freaking ever what happens is is that when the people start to understand like you're talking about and you're marketing to them what's really happening with technocracy, and here come the flock cameras and everything, they have an opinion. Well, we're going to make sure in this rural area out here they're informed and they got an opinion.

And that's why I need the geofencing, the geolocation, the issues, the platforms, everything that Aaron's doing. I'm going to pick your brain when we get done with this election. well yeah this is i'm happy to happy to share it this is actually you know i look at this as there's a lot of benefits doing all this stuff there's just more tools that we have for other things that are outside of politics and so i am definitely learning uh quite a bit about about the the targeting here so and yeah i rec i i can't recommend patrick wood enough i mean he is the og on technocracy i've read all of his books he has a online uh

boot camp workshop that i recommend on technocracy if you want to truly understand what's going on and he puts out new you know content every day and i think he's doing a 24 7 radio show he really is the the you know as people are learning about this hopefully that's where they end up right so this is my this is my fly now i learned about the flock camera and then hightail your way over to technocracy .news and start reading some of patrick's books because this influenced me i started out focused on cbdc's and when I was writing my book, I actually, you know, I was trying to answer the questions,

who are they, right? You know, who are they? And, you know, you end up getting into the Trilateral Commission, Club of Rome, and all these other groups and then I got into, that's, you know, where I found some more of Patrick Wood's information. Well, then it's like, oh, well, who's the Trilateral Commission? Well, it turns out Patrick has been keeping a database on exactly who they are. So I actually asked him, I reached out to him out of the blue, didn't know him. I said, hey, Do you happen to know who the members are? And he sent me a PDF. All of the names, like 420 people in North America and Europe and in Asia. And it's like, oh, look, Larry Fink's on there. Oh, look, Jamie Dimon is

there. And they have two or three year terms. This guy's been collecting all of this data. It is an absolute goldmine. It's like you can map how the world works if you can actually get this database of who these people are. And he's been honored. So there's definitely an overlap with, um, do you know who John Snisen is? The economic truth .com. You know, John compiled all the, what was it? The world economic forum, junior achievement club or whatever it is. Other youth people that, so he created a database of all these people and you look at it and you're going, well, there's the mayor of Phoenix and there's the city council list. We are saturated with this

crap. Yep. fyi oh yeah that's why it's so important what you're doing yep yeah no we are and and hopefully and again once you once you become aware once i remember watching it so patrick had there was some presentation he had the the pictures of technocracy inc these people in the 1930s they dressed in the same color gray suit um and like that just like this whole cult around it once you learn that you can't unlearn it and then you actually have to tell people about it because Because now you're starting to understand. Then things start to actually make sense. What seems to be like a series of disconnected things. You're like, nope, there's a purpose behind this. This

is a plan that's been going on for 100 years. And, you know, we're like... Well, describe technocracy. Tell people what that means. What's their goal? The goal of technocracy is to basically replace the governance model with a system where scientists and engineers make decisions for us. It's basically the end of free will. will. First of all, you replace the economy, our price -based system where we use money to buy and sell things with a system based on energy credits, and they control the energy credits. And so this becomes the currency. This is their kind of enforcement mechanism. So you can just imagine a top -down... Carbon tax.

Yeah. Carbon tax. Carbon credits are the new currency. And then all of a sudden, these scientists and engineers are designing social credit systems. And so your behavior, what you're allowed to do, what you can and cannot do, will determine how many of these energy credits you get access to. And so this is literally no property rights, no individual rights. There's no constitution. This is a completely different political ideology. And it's a global political ideology. And the fact that this started in the 1930s, I mean, this is before the internet. This is before computers and everything else. And these guys are talking about an energy credit system. Like it's actually remarkable that

how, you know, how, how far we've come on this. And this is why the trilateral commission is important because there was some internal dynamics with the technocracy movement. It kind of had a civil war went away for a while, and then it was brought back essentially by the trilateral commission. And that's the basis of the UN agenda 2030. 2030. So when you see the 17 sustainable development goals and all of that, there's a direct line to the Trilateral Commission and a direct line from the Trilateral Commission to technocracy. So this is how all these global institutions work and what they've been pushing as a framework. And knowing that is important and knowing why

you want to get out of that. And Elon Musk's grandfather was a big part of this technocracy party. And Elon Musk talks about about the fact we're not going to have money, it's going to be energy. And people like, well, this sounds great. You got to look into what technocracy is before you assume that, you know, Elon is doing something that's beneficial for human liberty, because it's not. He's not, and it's not a pro -liberty movement at all. I'm going to let you go ahead and go through your graphs, because it is interesting. I find this more interesting from a targeting aspect and marketing a lot of stuff that we want to do. So I'm very interested. Keep going.

So I do want to hold them accountable. And I have a limited amount of money and a limited amount of time. So I'm like, all right, well, how do I go? So I look at this information and then synthesize all this and figure out, all right, well, I'm going to target these ads in these places. And so part of it will be, again, this is a learning experiment for me because I know a lot about New Hampshire. I've already done this kind of stuff in New Hampshire. You know, we already, you know, groups would work together. You know, I worked with Eileen when she was the chair of the New Hampshire Liberty Alliance. I was running this Republican Liberty Caucus

group. And we would get together with charts of here are all the different towns, here are all the different cities. You know, are they Republican plus one, Democrat plus two? We recruit candidates, all that other stuff. But I don't know any of these other states. And so I'm getting a quick course on it. In this map right here, you have the middle of Iowa on the left where the Republican vote is. And then you go where the third party votes came from. And that gap in the Republican one has a big circle on the right. Explain that. You know, well, some of this may be misleading because the third party may not have gotten a lot of votes. But in this but in

this case, you know, scenario here, you're looking at, you know, Polk is the area here where a huge number of of these libertarian votes came from. And obviously you see this is kind of an inversion of where the Republican vote is now. It was. Natural law partner, what was it? It was the transcendental meditation thing in Jackson County they have there. You know, it was positive waves, kind of, they got a campus there or something. I was thinking that might be it. It could be. I don't even know. I mean, I'm actually putting these charts out, but I'm still learning, right? Like there's, you know, when I put this stuff out, you may know more about this than I

do. And some of it may be that the guy that was running is from there. you know you never know with these third party candidates but it at least tells us you know where we can start to look and I'm not doing a big you know I'm not doing like a big get out the vote campaign where I'm like alright this is where the third party votes come from I'm trying to go to where the Republican votes are I'm trying to find out where are the Republican where the people are pissed at Trump how do I find those people because again we're trying to send a very specific message now sometimes it's easy to

find that and sometimes it's not. And there's a lot of learning. And then in some cases, some of these states are small. If I'm participating, if I'm doing something in Kansas or Iowa or New Hampshire, I mean, in some cases, we'll just buy, we'll just blanket the state because there's not a lot of ad to buy, right? But Texas is a whole other scenario. We have to be more intelligent about what we do with Texas because it's very expensive. And so So we're spending more time trying to be more, you know, specific there. So, you know, again, some of this is I'll do an election night thing where I'll bring in all these maps. And, you know, as the election rolls in, we'll actually have

a knowledge of how well we're doing kind of in real time. So I do look forward to seeing how that plays out. But a lot of this is going to be learning for me up through the election. And there are a lot of dynamics that are changing. Again, we're talking about a big shift. Trump, there was a, you know, a wave in 2024. And now it's like there's looking like there could be a bigger wave in the other direction in a very short period of time. It could be impressive. Ohio, you're saying, is J .D. and Vivek, right? Yes. What's Vivek running for? Vivek is running for governor. Really? And the seat, the U .S. Senate seat, is the former seat of J .D. Vance. Where the current guy actually

was appointed by the governor. So he didn't win. He was appointed, this guy, Husted, who is very arrogant, very unpopular. And I know you know Bill Redpath is the libertarian there. But man, you look at Ohio. This is one of the most interesting things. So in case the cost of living, that's big everywhere. everywhere. But number two issue, oppose more tax incentives for new data centers. That's the number two issue. The number three issue, data centers are mostly bad for home energy costs. In fact, I mean, and then a couple more down, oppose an AI data center in their area. So here's the thing, Vivek, of course, when we did this episode, when I did this episode with Craig, and

we did this deep dive, these guys are all over this. JD Vance, Peter Thiel, these guys are are investors in a lot of these data centers. And so Vivek, who fooled a lot of people when he ran for president into thinking he's somehow a libertarian, the people that fell for this in New Hampshire, it was mind boggling to me. Look at this guy's record, right? This guy is not a libertarian. He is absolutely a technocrat. And there's Thrive Capital. There are these investment vehicles like these guys are all over it. And J .D. Vance and Vivek are close friends. Like, you know, I think J .D. Vance's son

is named Vivek. Like, the whole thing is really, really weird. Well, they're courting the freedom -oriented liberty community with the rhetoric of blah, blah, blah, blah. In fact, Vivek came to the Porcupine Freedom Festival, you know, in New Hampshire in his campaign bus. I remember that. You know, you have these guys come there courting us. But he did. And I was running for president that year. And Vivek and I ended up having a lot of conversations because he was pissed that I was running. Because obviously, if you're trying to run for president in the important state of New

Hampshire and there's this other guy painting the ass who's a libertarian who's running, I'm going to pull votes from him. So that became a whole issue. So then we had some other people. I mean, there's a wing of the, quote, libertarian movement here that's pushing Peter Thiel garbage, that's actually pushing technocracy. And those people backed Vivek. And they still back Vivek. But I mean, at some point, there are things that I'm looking forward to outside of the races that I'm supporting. I want Vivek to lose. and I will tell you I'll give you a preview of what's going to happen with StarkFreedom after this election is J

.D. Vance is the first thing we're going to go after J .D. Vance is the first person we're going to go after with the super PAC after this election cycle because J .D. Vance is a puppet he is Peter Thiel's puppet I mean I've done multiple episodes on this I've tracked this down it is bad news and a lot of what happened they sold people this guy Curtis Yarvin who's like the Yuval Noah Harari of the right, has been pushing this propaganda. And a lot of it is really around the idea of, one, misrepresenting that our form of government is a democracy, not a constitutional republic. So the first thing that

they do is they say, oh, we're a democracy and democracies are not as good as monarchies. And we need to go back to having a strong central authority to the point where this guy, Curtis Yarvin, has been calling for a monarch or a CEO or a dictator. Hamilton. Hamilton. And they've been pushing this. And there's a splinter of the libertarian movement that's bought into this. Well, this is not libertarian at all. This is actually a big, this is a threat to the free state. These are not libertarians at all. I've been fighting this battle for decades, Aaron. And this is, you know, just the same old same old politics, politics. It is politics. But man, it's got this has

got to be stopped. And J .D. Vance also. So this consolidation of power pushing for a sovereign wealth fund, for instance, is something that Trump, I think, signed an executive order on. He needs Congress to to actually approve it. But we're doing a sovereign wealth fund. I mean, the U .S. government now owns like 10 percent of Intel and they're not doing it like through through Congress that way. They're finding backdoor ways to essentially create a sovereign wealth fund. Well, I mean, this is what dictators and Middle Eastern sovereign wealth fund is is incompatible with the Constitution and free markets. And I probably like it's just not

it's not a good thing. But the reason that they're doing this, Yarvin and Thiel pushed this, isn't because Trump was going to be the guy that they were consolidating power around. They were using Trump as the vehicle to consolidate the power to then hand it to J .D. Vance. This is a big deal. And so I won't talk about it as much today because it's not, well, we've got this election. But but this is, you know, to me, at the end of this, we have to stop. Technocracy is the biggest threat. And J .D. Vance is the, you know, the the puppet of the technocrats, more specifically of Peter Thiel. So that that for another day. But anyway, data. So so I want to see Vivek lose. Does that mean I do

I like the Democrat? I don't I don't like that. I don't care about the Democrat, but I do worry about technocracy and I worry about libertarians confusing, you know, like even this data center issue. I'm all for free markets and I like AI. But when you have a data center that is pushed from the top down where we are giving the Department of Energy control over whether an AI model can be released, we're giving the FTC the ability to determine whether or not an AI model is politically biased or not. And then we're doing all this other stuff in, you know, in the interest of national security, which is going to

mean open source developers of AI are going to have personal liability. If that's the top down approach, and then on top of that, you add state subsidies, this is not libertarian or free market. I mean, and so Vivek losing is symbolic. And that's, it's a good sign, because I, man, I'm doing all this to try to slow technocracy. I mean, we need to exit and build and use privacy coins and get off the grid and do all of that stuff. But, man, if we don't slow technocracy, it's going to be hard to do this. And so Vivek losing would be huge, a huge blow. How is he doing in the polling? Is he expected to win? He's down eight points now. It's been a massive reversal. He was up and he's just

plummeted. And the main reason he's plummeted is this data center issue. And what did Trump do? Trump flies into Ohio. And in front of a group of people in Ohio says, you'll be poor and backwards unless you embrace these data centers. And so he leaves. And then Sherrod Brown, the Democrat, surged in the polls. And so now Sherrod Brown, who was voted out, I think, in 24, maybe it was 22. I mean, he sucks. Don't get me wrong. He's really bad in a lot of areas. But now he's way ahead because of this data center issue. And Trump is pushing the data center issue. And Vivek is pushing the data center

issue. It's going to cost them. The data center issue is like a 90 -10 issue. People don't like these data centers. They don't like them at all. They don't like flock cameras. And they don't necessarily know why they don't like it, perhaps. But they have maybe some intuitive sense. But Ohio, because of what John Kasich did, without telling people and all of these subsidies... I mean, again, when we did this episode, I mean, there are a lot of people getting cancer. They didn't build them properly. They created like, you know, a billion dollar subsidy led to like 10 jobs. The whole thing has been a disaster in Ohio. And so,

yeah, I'm very much rooting for Vivek to lose. And, you know, who knows? Maybe our campaign and what we're doing here in the Senate race can help with that. General public opinion. I've been pushing the Ohio thing. Again, I will tell you, when we did the episode on Ohio, I was so stunned by how bad it is that I completely redid the Technocracy Atlas website that we have, which you can go to technocracyatlas .com and you can get a report. It shows the growth of technocracy from 1973, when the Triadal Commission was formed, projected out to 2030. It shows the growth of technocracy by state and by country, and you can get a report for your own state.

That's how blown away I was about how bad technocracy is in Ohio. I'm like, well, God, how bad is it everywhere? And then I compiled all of this data on all of the states and then put together a ranking and everything else. And I'm like, wow, so this is worse than I thought. I mean, Patrick Wood had been talking about this a lot. Yeah, let me add a little color to that so people understand what we're talking about. In the 70s, Patrick Wood was, I don't know, he was in the financials and somehow he came across that there was a whole bunch of crossover with these people that they were doing hostile takeovers or taking over companies. All this consolidation into, you know, like

everything is Nabisco, you know, or Kraft or, you know, everything's owned by, you know, Time Warner or something like that. And he was seeing this starting to happen back in the 70s. And he's going, who are these people? Where do they come from? And he started doing some research with, I think it was Professor Sutton from the Hoover Institute. The Hoover Institute was on this. And he and Sutton kind of built this up and they wrote the book. Patrick wrote the book. trilateralist over Washington. Well, he goes on Larry King. I'll be back. Go ahead. I'll be back in one second. That's fine. He goes on Larry King, and they talk about it. All of a sudden, it sells out at B.

Dalton bookstores or whatever. 60 ,000 copies. Man, what's up? Well, what happened then after he did that, you go to get the book. What book? We don't know what you're talking about. It's out of publication. It's not. They canceled them by controlling the bookstores. You know, this is how it happens. So cancel culture and all this stuff's been going on since for freaking ever. So where it kind of started in the and these are part of this trilateral thing. It was Jimmy Carter's administration. When Jimmy Carter first became president, all of a sudden, all his cabinet were trilateral guys and so on. And what they were talking about trilateral, it was Europe

and I think primarily Germany, Japan and the United States. This was a three legged stool what they were going to build this stuff on. Well, that's why they had to get into the government on each of these countries areas, you know, for domination of the world economy. Well, it came out of, there's a Columbia professor named Zabriniu Brzezinski, okay, which was part of the cabinet in Carter's administration. He was at Columbia where technocracy kind of started, I think, you know, decades before, where he wrote a book that was called called Between Two Ages, America's Role in the New Technotronic Era.

And that was it, Between Two Ages, America's Role in This. And that was Brzezinski that did this. Well, of course, you know, the Rockefellers and they, them, those, and their secret handshake club meeting, Bilderberg and whatever the heck. They got, oh, man, here's one of us. He's the man. This is what we want to do. And from that, you know, Brzezinski and Rockefeller and, you know, Secret Handshake Club, they come in and start and they create the Trilateral Commission. And then you have the Council on Foreign Relations, all this stuff, your tinfoil hat conspiracy nut, if you say this stuff. And then I remember, wasn't too long ago, 2000s and something, all of a sudden you had them

celebrating their 40th anniversary. And they come out, tell the media, thank you for keeping a secret and being part of the club and so on. you're a freaking tinfoil hat nut right up until the trilateral commission starts celebrating their 40th anniversary i mean you know it is to laugh and then there was a a sitcom called barney miller and it was about a police precinct a detective is in new york or whatever and they have one guy going on passing out stuff and then and it was all to make fun of the trilateral commission They were it made it got enough attention that they had to gaslight it and make fun of it on national television. This is how far they go. This has been

going on for a long time. And Patrick Wood identified and outed all this. And now he's back and we're having a lot of fun. I'm sorry, Aaron's back. Go ahead, man. man. Yeah. Yeah. I, you know, I'm going to actually see if I can pull that clip up that Barney Miller clip. Cause it's a, it's, it's exactly, you know, he explains it, but they make him look like a conspiracy theorist, tinfoil hat guy. But you know, it's, it's a very detectives that explained it. He's going, well, he's like the smart guy goes, well, what they're doing. And he says it, you know? Yep, exactly. So I'll pull that up. Let me, you know, I realized my, I have to go in like,

probably 20 minutes. My daughter's coming home. I got to let her into the building. It's a, anyway. So I've got a lot more slides, but I'll, I'll summarize, you know, it's, it's, it's all the same format. And again, it's, I'll just show maybe some of the differences. So Minnesota is a state where the number one issue is the decision to go to war in Iran. Okay. So this is that the Minnesota is one of the rare places where that is the number one issue. And then, of course, you know, all the economy and because it has a big Muslim population. Yep. Yeah. I mean, that's a that's that's a good point. Michigan, too, of course. And so I'm just showing

this to show that where the issues are. And the the libertarian there, Rebecca Whiting, was was in the military, was in Iraq. And of course, she's she's anti -war now and she's big into homesteading and everything else. And so just to make points about the fact that these are actually quality candidates, principled candidates. Now, by the way, you might say, well, why Minnesota? I mean, how is Minnesota in play? Minnesota is solidly, you know, Democrat. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, it's the only state that voted for Mondale in 1984. It was his home state. I mean, Minnesota is usually not in play. But this is a particular situation because of the

fraud and Tim Walz and because they have a pretty weak candidate where this is actually in play. So this is the reason Minnesota was the last state that we added. We started with four and we ended up with eight because, again, my goal is to cost the Republicans the Senate and hold them accountable. So this is how we ended up in Minnesota. Minnesota. So, um, you know, a bunch of stuff there. Michigan is, is a, uh, you know, quite, quite a race. Uh, you, you have a Muslim candidate running on the Democrat side. You have Mike Rogers, who is a career politician, pro surveillance guy, ex FBI, like everything that, you know, that you could, you could not like. And, uh, last time around Rogers lost

because of the libertarians because of her third party. So he's already aware of this. This has already been an issue for him. But here again, number one issue in Michigan, opposing the federal tax breaks for data centers. And Mike Rogers, he has personal investments in data centers. But this data center issue is huge. And it's a great opportunity for us to educate people about technocracy. This is a huge springboard. That's what I love about this issue. So a lot of people don't know that you're forced. They're taking your retirement, your 401ks, your IRAs, and it's getting invested in the data centers, whether you like it or

not. You know, this is when it crashes, it's going to have a big impact on people's retirement. Here it comes. It is. And then they're using patriotism as the justification for you to help give subsidies to multinational technocratic corporations. It's actually pretty disgusting the way that they're doing that. They're trying to make this a U .S.-China issue with companies that are doing business in China. It's just kind of disgusting to watch, but predictable. Now, there's a libertarian in this race, but we picked Tim Long, who is a National Taxpayer Party. And the National Taxpayer Party was originally the Constitution. There's

some battle over the name or whatever, but this guy is a hardcore constitutional limited government guy, but he has literally no campaign. There's no information about the guy. I mean, he's run for things before, but he has zero campaign. And I think he put out one ad that said, I don't want your money. God's going to support me through the campaign or whatever. But we picked Aaron Day, God's messenger. Well, we picked him in part because in this analysis just shows, you know, this is where we did the analysis of Mike Rogers, where Mike Rogers lost because Trump won in Michigan. And so we looked at, well, where did Mike Rogers lose? And and so the taxpayer candidate pulled, whereas the

libertarian candidate was kind of neutral, was almost pulling equally from Democrats and Republicans, didn't have an impact there. So this is why our guy might get a smaller percentage even than the Libertarian, but his votes are highly concentrated and pulled from Republicans. So I wanted to kind of put that out there. Good point. A lot of thought in the thing. Now, New Hampshire, I've got a few things to talk about. New Hampshire, Trump is way down in approval rate. I think his approval rating is like 32 % or something here in New Hampshire. and Trump's never won New Hampshire, even, even though it was a big state. I mean, he won the

primary here and this was a big kickoff point, but, but he, he doesn't win in the, in the general, uh, in his net approval is, uh, is net 35. And so, uh, you know, so, and then, you know, he's the Republican who obviously I, when I was running, I've explained to everybody buddy that Sununu is the Patriot Act, TARP, surveillance, real ID. I mean, he's been on the wrong side of all of these issues, and it's a political dynasty situation. There are multiple strategic reasons why it would be good if he lost. So the issues here in New Hampshire are gas prices, cost of living, tariffs. Data centers aren't a big issue here because there aren't a lot of data

centers here because the energy prices are high. So, you know, there are reasons why, you know, issues are what they are. Now, there's a backlash against data centers coming here. But the reality is there aren't that many data centers that want to come. Arizona's Phoenix theory got boatload, man. Here they come. Yeah. But Ed Laplante, again, Constitution. He's an auto mechanic, father, grandfather, Marine, straight Constitution guy. But 87 % of the people haven't heard of him. I did want to just pop up a couple of things that just happened today you know and again when I was right before I filed Sununu was up plus three the latest polls have

Pappas the Democrat up eight or nine points and it's gone from being a toss up state to leaning Democrat so this and then something happened today which was interesting let me pull this up if I can I guess I can't. Well, so two things happened. One, the Republican who ran in 2022, the Republican candidate for U .S. Senate, Don Baldock, just endorsed the Democrat today. So this was actually major news that that the previous previous

Republican candidate for U .S. Senate actually actively endorsed the Democrat. Now, I respect his position on Sununu. I think he should have endorsed Ed Laplante. But nevertheless, this is not going to help Sununu, who's already down, you know, 70 points. points. And part of the reason is, uh, Bulldog is in the military and has a big military support. And so he basically said Pappas is better on military issues. So this is going to have an impact. This is very, this is very negative for Sununu. The other, the other thing that I bring up is that, um, Kelly Ayotte published a letter, uh, that she sent

to the safety officer at X asking to have the libertarian party of New Hampshire's website, uh, Twitter account taken taken down because now multiple times there have been threats of like, you know, not threats though. You know, the language is being written in a way where it's like, well, we would be okay if all of the Democrat candidates were assassinated. And then they've been doubling down on this language, not outright saying they would do it or making it a threat, but basically going as far as you can to push the edge of the language to the point now where the governor and others are actually asking for this account to be okay now wait a

minute new hampshire libertarian party it's my vote of the executive council it's the chair it's i mean it's an official statement we need to assassinate democrats they're actually saying that yeah let me i want to get the language the exact language and and i thought i had it uh up here because actually those tweets might well you know what let me see because I want to be, I want to explain the language and then you'll see the difference, but effectively that's how it's perceived. Um, let me see if the, the account, oh, there we go. Um, and of course Jeremy Kaufman is out, but yeah, baiting it is rage bait for him. So let me see what the

post, the most recent one, there have been like three posts related to this. Let me see if I can find... It's all right. I get it. It's Al's Quiddit. They're going to censor if they can. That's one reason why I'm not really into party politics, except maybe at the local level, because Because you always got somebody speaking for you. I don't like that. You know, I'd rather, you know, candidates, you know, they speak for themselves, you know, this party thing, you know, or Trump saying he rules me or speaks for everybody, you know, that kind of crap.

Yeah, I can't. Yeah, don't worry about it. Go ahead and continue. I'm interested in what you're doing. But it was, I mean, it was effectively that and then doubled down on it. And it's created quite a catastrophe. free. I actually think that the blowback is going to be that this might actually cost the Republicans the House in New Hampshire, because this is such a big deal all of the time. And this is repeated posts of the same type. And I know the person who's doing it and, you know, the basis of it is, oh, well, you know, these are base tweets that are going to attract other people to come here. And there's a whole like rationality behind it. But to be honest, it's pissed

off. I think it's done substantially more damage than it's done. Yeah, no, there's always those people. I get it. We know them. I mean, we know them, but I thought I'd add that because these are dynamics for the race. I don't know how much this is going to – I think it will affect the Senate race in the same fact that the people pushing this kind of language, the LPNH, are supporting Sununu. And so I think there's going to be a lot of blowback from this. But it'll be interesting to watch. So obviously, I know the New Hampshire race pretty well. I do encourage people to vote for Ed Laplante. I think that it's, again, over Chris Pappas. I mean, again, the point is

that obviously, you know, the net effect is the Dem is going to end up winning this. But the message needs to be don't put up these shitty surveillance state nepotistic political dynasty candidates. That's the message that needs to come out of this. And it's not as clear if you're actually voting for the Democrat. To be clear, the Democrat sucks. I mean, he's not good on any of you. You're not making a you're making a bad decision. You're going to regret voting for Pappas. I say you regret voting. But, you know, I see what you're doing. I'm supportive. So anyway, that's and we know how this how this goes. at this race, Jeremy Coffin, who may be the person behind these LPNH tweets, ran in 2022

for U .S. Senate, got 2 % of the vote, which, by the way, was way down. I got 2 .4 % of the vote in 2016. And there was also a libertarian on the ballot. So actually, I think Jeremy probably contributed a lot to third parties suffering, which I think he thinks is part of being strategic. But I do not. I think it would be helpful for people to to vote third party, vote for Ed and, you know, and help get the Constitution Party ballot access for 2028. I mean, there are I actually I know I know Jeremy and he's kind of shifty as a family man. It was a business guy. He created, you know, a great little library and Odyssey. And he had a lot. And the man came

after him. That really, I think, shifted his attitude because he was part of the crypto crowd and lots of innovation, had really good tech. And they just they just beat him into some submission, if not into submission, they beat him. I mean, you know, just pounded on him. He had a successful entrepreneur business going and the government just hammered on him. And I think it had an impact on him. Yeah, I think it did too I don't know what all this is, but it's been a problem It's going to continue to be a problem And we'll see what the What happens as a result of this But I do think it's going to be It's going to have an impact that it's not what he Thinks

it's going to be, I think it may cost New Hampshire a house I think he got affected Emotionally I think so too, so These are part of the elements I mean, again, I do know New Hampshire Well, and I will tell you you know you'll read that you know free staters are taking over the state house and everything else but then you talk to some other people and like there's a there are huge disagreements about the direction that things are going in but fundamental disagreements even within the liberty community on some significant issues and there's some strategic approaches and i you know jeremy claimed that peter was involved in this thing that he started

there's just a lot lot of drama. I actually try to stay away from it and not to engage it, but I'm only saying it now because of the fact that I'm predicting it's going to have an impact on these elections that's going to be negative for the liberty movement. So anyway, where the votes are and where I am is actually going to be a good spot. I've said this a lot. One of the things that I have been saying in New Hampshire for 14 years is that you may think that politics is from the bottom up, but it's from the top down. And whether you want it to be or not, and I think that we're going to see that that is actually the case. So in a year where

there's not a contested election or whatever at the federal level, we may win a lot of House seats, but it's only because people just don't care that much about state government. And so you end up thinking you're making all this progress and it gets completely wiped away in a federal election um but i hope that's not the case i hope uh i hope that the irony is the most likely republican to win is kelly ayotte the person that i helped oust in 2016 so the only thing you could do for me in the future we do this again make the text larger i'm old man yeah i'm i'm yeah i'm seeing that that's it's not it's not all that clear for me as well well unfortunately i've got i've got to wrap this up.

But South Carolina is one that we added. Darline Graham, Lindsey Graham's sister, was appointed to this seat. She's absolutely horrible and knows nothing about the issues. She's a puppet for Trump, and nobody thought South Carolina would be in play. But it is. And in fact, this is one of the rare states where the Libertarian candidate was allowed to be on the debate stage. And so she was on. I watched the debate on Sunday and actually does a great job of articulating libertarian positions. I think she's a business school professor. Her big issue is the national debt. And so it'll be interesting to see how that one plays out. But if this

race flips, it's probably going to be because of the libertarian candidate. No one thought that this was even going to be in play. And in fact, there hasn't even been a lot of polling information on this, but I think that's going to be a real shocker for everyone. So anyway, that's, you know, I rushed through here at the end, but it's kind of a quick overview of of these races. But I mean, you know, look, we could end up impacting a significant portion of these races already. Five of the eight races, our candidates are the margin. margin. And in two of the cases where they're not the margin, it's because

the Democrat has opened up such a wide lead that our candidate's not the margin because of how big the gap is. So in reality, I mean, right now, if the trends stay the way that they are, if you believe any of the data, this could be a bloodbath. You'd be looking at 55, 45. I don't think it's going to necessarily turn out that way but i mean uh these eight races that we're in they're critical and and people should be listening to this and and i hope we are you know effective at getting these issues out and making liberty making it very clear that the republicans lost because they lost their way they violated the constitution uh they they opted to go for corruption and cronyism and

technocracy see a big government and and completely you know went against their principles you know this is the win how you described it right there that's the win that's why you know the polling data and who win have don't care the fact that you got the soapbox and you got their attention and you are going to have an impact i think it's going to go better your way than you think but that's not the win for me because you know a decade from now you're not going to look back and know even what I have, who cares? It's the minds that you changed, the impact you had on general public opinion, the issues that are being discussed that are important

that you've identified. That is the win. And exposing technocracy, that's a big giant win right there. So man, I'll let you go. Go take care of your daughter. But I'm telling you, I am so excited for this. I was really really looking forward to demonstrating, probably rambled too much, but I just want people to understand from someone that knows, been doing this political activism, seeing the impact, the decade after decade changes, the shift, the trends, this is such an important method and time between exactly what Aaron Day is doing. Because we've been, you know, talking up until, you know, before you're going to file, you're not going to file New Hampshire. And I've

been paying attention to Aaron and his capabilities. It is monumental and demonstrates what one, one, one couple can do. One. You always got to give props to the wife, man, because you got to give props to the wife. But, you know, one guy and his spouse can do out there whip ass. Congratulations. Congratulations. You already won, in my opinion. Thank you You are the OG and you've already done all this You've already proven this stuff We're just trying to scale it up Thank you for Everything that you do and for blazing All these trails I am Flabbergasted By your capability as an individual It's all that we dreamed of Computer, working Let's do

what you want I want to help get everybody free Let's go do that that well you the man the man and the woman your wife your beautiful wife i you know just it's great that you have you know such a lovely supporting wife behind all this that's very important you know i know that personally oh yeah i wouldn't i wouldn't be doing any of this without her so that's 100 the case all right go take care of family man peace brother peace have a great night bye Voy a cantarles un corrido Listen now, amigos Of seven names from north to south Builders of the code

The first man in In King, New Hampshire stood Federal boots came at the dawn Eight years for what was good You said the war was over Walk them home Code is free speech Free them all And the war on loose The second man, Roger Ver, fought from a Spanish hole Fifty million in a gag order The judge took his voice in gold The third

sterling of twelve and a half On a black box he stood The forensic secret The source code never showed Roman Storm wrote the contract Forty years on the line Keone built the wallet On a Christmas Eve in time William wrote privacy at 67 From Lisbon shore Raid banked the unbanked Deported through the door Martelli Blanche gave the speech at the conference The president said the war was over, hermano But the cages stayed locked when the cameras left And we have the receipt We have the receipt, hermano Corrido de los siete, perdón,

demor You said the war was over Walk them home Code is free speech Free them all Senate 50, 2, 49 End the war or lose You pardon Ross The seven are still owed America won't lead the world in crypto If it cages its innovators End the war or lose Congress Money transmitter laws And the Bank Secrecy Act The code outlives the warden Corrido de los siete, pardon them all You said the war was over,

walk them home Code is free speech, free them all End the war or lose Congress The code outlives the warden Free him Free Roger Free Roman Free Storm Free Kion Free William Free Ray Corrido de los Siete Pardon them all The code outlives the warden