Epstein's Secret Bitcoin Hijacking Exposed

started with one photo one connection one name ran it through google images reverse searching no shame found three more photos found a flight log found a date cross reference with public records now i'm up to weight tagged it in the discord someone found a The donations, the chain Now we got forty-seven people Mapping the campaign One becomes, two becomes, ten becomes more Truth has a net rock effect we can't ignore Every connection reveals ten more doors This is the cascade, this is the score Truth cascade, watch it domino One investigation leads to another, watch it go Truth cascade,

we can't stop the flow We extracted the GPS from the location from the property records from the LLC from the show

Five becomes fifty becomes spread Truth is exponential once it leaves your head Every whistleblower empowers ten more instead This is the cascade, this is the thread Truth cascade Watch it dial me, no one investigation leads to They try to compartmentalize, separate the scandals Keep the connections

hidden but we're digital vandals Taking down the walls between their separate lives Watching the cascade reveal the enterprise Truth cascade, watch it dial me, no one investigation leads to another, watch it go Truth cascade, we can't stop the flow

Cascade Cascade True Cascade Started with one photo Ended with five hundred connections That's the Cascade That's the power

I woke up to silence But the war had begun They froze my account Said I'd done something wrong Wasn't no crime Just living free Now the system Got a chain on me They took my savings My future, my land.

With a single code line and a government hand. Said it was safety. Said it was green. But all I see is tyranny behind the screen. This ain't innovation. It's a trap in disguise. Watched all your lies. Genius ain't freedom. Gravity ain't clear. It's a cage they built while we cheered.

But the same old swamp just changed its brand He banned the front door, opened the back Signed the bills that launched a fire This ain't innovation It's a trap in disguise You'll own nothing Be watched all

your life Genes ain't freedom It's a cage they built while we cheered Your gold, your guns, your voice, your name They'll digitize it all then shift the blame Palantirizing AI chains Freedom dying slow in patriotic flames

This ain't about safety It's control in disguise With your ID, your face, your tears, your time They wrapped it in stars, sold it with pride But freedom's bleeding out from the inside. Death caught one, and they call it peace. But I still got breath, I still believe. We can break the code, escape the scheme.

Turn this nightmare back into a dream. Boom!

In a cage that called design

Thought they'd make us all comply They'd kill the cash flow Thought we'd roll over and die But underground is rising Growing stronger every day When they shut the front door Beneath the watchful eye Sovereign money, sovereign man

We go low when they go high Built beneath a watchful eye Sovereign money, sovereign mind

Live free or die, but death's not the worst It's waking up it's dying of thirst Trading your days for empty, insurance and pills While the machine builds your cage and you're paying the bills Quiet aspiration, that's the real grave. A life half lived as a comfortable slave. This ain't what you were born for, you know it's true. You feel it in your chest, breaking through. Checking your dollars underneath your skin Left and right, same throne,

same crown No one stands up, no one makes a sound They hand you a ballot like it means something real Two wings of one bird, same deal, same steel We say no, no to the chase No to the dollar running through our veins No to the white no coats, It's hurts right here, it's hurts right now Your rights are yours, you take them back, not giving out Not from the left, not from the right They were always yours,

now step into the light The daylight a new day comes We take it back breaks, We fan the flame Nothing will ever be the same

Welcome back to the Aaron Day Show. All right. This is season two, excuse me, season three, episode seven. So let me just pop these slides up here. real quick um wow quite a bit to talk about it has been a an exceptional week with just chock full of incredible developments across the board i think this might actually be episode six my bad season three episode six epstein's secret bitcoin hijacking exposed so If you have been following me on X, you'll note that I've been talking about

this kind of nonstop since the release of We've been talking about the Clarity Act the documents. and the importance of stopping the Clarity You have the Genius Act, Act. which basically puts in a programmable system to track everything that you pay. The Clarity Act will put in a tokenization system that controls everything that you own. And when I say that with tokenization, it basically is putting in a technology that will allow third parties, namely the government, to be able to track all of your transactions, not just what you buy and sell, but the assets that you own, program those transactions and even censor So it's much worse than even just a them. CBDC.

So for the last several episodes... I've been talking about that in various ways. However, the Epstein files leaked, or not leaked, but were released at the end of the month in January. And I have been going through those, as of course have many others, but I've been building this site, Technocracy Atlas. So I've downloaded all three million documents and I'm in the process. I have about eight hundred thousand of the documents up on the website and have been going through them and let me just say wow first of all i mean complete vindication with respect to what i have been saying which we'll be going through tonight my

brownstone article that was just released today complete vindication that shows that in fact jeffrey epstein was directly involved in funding the hijacking of bitcoin but heavily involved in crypto in general since about twenty eleven through brock pierce who i did an entire episode about last season and this leads into tether and howard lutnik all of it is connected i speculated that it was connected in a couple of episodes last year. But I said at the time, you can tell, how did these people connect? How did all this get put together? We now know explicitly how it got put together.

These Epstein files... The thing that's the most important about the Epstein file is not the sex stuff. The sex stuff is horrible. And obviously, people involved in that should be dealt with accordingly. But the real insight from the Epstein file is how power works and how decisions get made. I spend a lot of time in a variety of different contexts explaining to people that things are not how they appear on the surface. Politicians don't have the power. It is people behind the scenes driving the power. What we are actually fighting isn't red versus blue or the United States versus other countries. It's actually a technocratic agenda. It's large multinational corporations,

but it's about five hundred people. that are pushing a global technocratic agenda. That's actually what we're up against. And when I say that, it seems remote. It seems very removed because we have this expectation that, well, no, we have these political parties, we have this democratic process, and this is how things work. And that's not how things work. The Epstein file shows how things work. It shows how power works. It shows how money works. And it shows how it works with many layers. One of the things that I find fascinating, well, I knew this already, but that I hope other people learn and is one of the things that comes out of this is, you know, for instance,

Epstein doesn't invest directly in any of these companies, right? I mean, he's a convicted, you know, And so no one's going to want his pedophile. name on a cap table or on a share certificate, right? So what you see through these emails is how he goes about investing in these various organizations, whether it's MIT or whether it's to invest in Coinbase, the big cryptocurrency exchange that we talk about quite often on this show related to the Genius and Clarity Acts, whether it's how he invested in Blockstream. But then beyond that, it's not even Epstein necessarily investing his own money. He's investing money for other people. And one of the things that we learned,

and you want to talk about the conspiracy theory of conspiracy theories, it turns out that Epstein is managing money for the Rothschild family, right? I mean, this is one of those things where you mentioned the Rothschilds, you mentioned the Rockefellers, and people are like, oh, well, this is tinfoil hat stuff. No, sure enough, There's the agreement. There are emails. He's paid twenty five million dollars to manage money for the Rothschild family. And then there's an email literally between Jeffrey Epstein and Peter Thiel saying when he's reaching out to Thiel for presumably the first time or early on in the relationship. As you may know, I manage investments for the Rothschilds

in technology. So this is just incredible information. And what I've done... So with the Technocracy Atlas that I've created... Not only do I have all of the other document drops from Epstein, but we have all the other information that we've loaded in there. We have all of Patrick Wood's information, Courtney Turner's information, Whitney Webb's information. I built this because as we talk about AI and as we've learned from Mike Adams, language models are just a way to interact with data. What data you're interacting with is what really matters. And when you're using ChatGPT and these you're other models, They've trained this information on things like Reddit, which, by the way,

we now know Ghislaine Maxwell had a massive influence on the structure of the data of Reddit. So it's not even unfair to say that a lot of these large language models were heavily influenced by Ghislaine Maxwell's influence on Reddit. It's crazy. But what I said was, look, when you look at those things. I can't get any information out of these LLMs. When I'm doing any of the research that any of the stuff that I write, I do, I can't use these mainstream models to actually get information. This has always been the case. So, So I'm like, okay, I bought a hundred and twenty six terabyte hard drive. And I'm like, I'm going to download all of this information. And then I'm going to use a language

model so that people can interact with that information. And then took it to the next step where we're going to be able to crowdsource research together. Because when you talk about something like the hijacking of Bitcoin, I literally know people. I mean, I, to a certain degree, have been involved in it, but I know people that are principal actors that have been there the whole time. They're legitimate first sources. They have information that they can put. So we're obviously not going to get any information out of the DOJ or anywhere else, but if we want to actually try to learn the truth, we can maybe crowdsource it together. So I have all these different databases,

but then I've added the Pandora Papers, the Panama Papers. You may remember a few years back, I guess maybe it was even longer than that now, a group of independent journalists got together. It was released through, I think, from a lawyer or an accounting firm. All of this data on all of these trust accounts and foreign accounts all around the world, I think we have something like thirteen and a half million records, account records from there that, by the way, I can now map to Epstein. There's even an email in there of Epstein saying, I'm worried about the Pandora Papers. So we now have the ability to start connecting dots and pieces that have never been put together. And to be honest,

even when these investigative journalists were working on this data, they're not financial experts. So they may be able to cobble this but they don't know who these people are together, or even how necessarily money flows. So we are going to learn about how the entire world works through this information. It is that powerful and it will change people's entire lives. view of reality and how things work and what the motivations are and who the players actually are. We're sitting here saying we're playing by the Constitution and then we have people with no morality representing foreign countries and other interests that are pushing a completely separate agenda. And they're doing it covertly.

They're manipulating the media. I read a thing I was just reading this this afternoon where Epstein was able to edit and manipulate his Wikipedia page. And he was working with Steve Bannon to repair his image. He was able to get a convicted sex offender removed from his page. And then they went in and figured out how to take the IP addresses of everyone that was going in and trying to modify his page and have them blocked so that they couldn't edit his page. So I'm giving you just some of the tidbits here in the intro. Obviously, the focus today is going to be specifically on Bitcoin. But I encourage you. And now with this also said, the Technocracy Atlas,

I don't have all the documents loaded. I'm going to show you the Technocracy Atlas, but I'm not still wait. Wait until I get the rest of the documents uploaded and make a few other changes before uploading. we go full force on it. Like I want it to be, it needs to be a bit easier to use, but it's getting close. I even am duplicating that. You may say Gmail where, you know, somebody took Epstein's emails and basically made them available in like a Gmail type of viewer. i've done that as well i'm replicating that but i'm replicating that so that you can go through the emails and you can say okay i'm going to tag this and i'm going to add it to a project so we're working on the epstein's

involvement in crypto project here's an email tag it and then boom it's there and now everybody that's working on that project can see that piece of evidence it's just it's really cool i'm really excited about it and by the way today's episode was supposed to be about launching own nothing Dot com or dot org. I think it's dot org. And that was originally what we talked about last week. But events are moving so quickly that, you know, I guess I would say I don't usually schedule these things out very far in the And I'm definitely not going to based on future. everything that's going on in the world. Related to Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies, technocracy. In fact, we have a real window.

I will say I'm actually pretty optimistic. I mean, we still have to move very quickly and the odds are not in our favor. I mean, we're not like Epstein who won the lottery twice. We don't have those kinds of odds. But this Epstein thing has blown everything open. It's blown crypto open. You can see ties to both political parties, ties to people in the administration, including Howard Lutnick, who I've talked about, including to Trump, including to all of it. And the Clarity Act, I just learned an hour or two ago, has been pushed back. So they're not going to be bringing that back until the spring. So there had been some discussion that they might vote on it this week.

So we've actually bought some time. And I actually think that this Epstein thing is going to increase the odds of us being able to make a persuasive case. Or not even us make a persuasive case. I think it's going to be pretty toxic for politicians to even deal with this stuff. So I'll get into the details on that. I'm going to go through the... normal intro stuff i will say i have a hard stop at say eight fifty i'm gonna be on another podcast i'm gonna be i believe live with bitcoin.com talking about the clarity act so if if i do just give you forewarning if if we get into the q a it might not even go that long today but if we get into the q a and i have to shut it off a little early that's

why So last week's episode was one hundred and twenty days and it was about the architects of of Tether essentially. And what's going on with the genius and but with kind of a little bit of clarity acts, an emphasis on Tether and the fact that this guy, Bo Hines, came out of nowhere. No crypto experience was recruited to be Trump's crypto advisor. got involved pushed the genius act and then immediately left to become the president of uh tether usa uh you know and then they then they actually literally launched last week usat which is tether which is a regulated stable coin that can be tracked and frozen where the treasuries

are backed by the company owned by u.s commerce secretary howard lutnik who's tied to epstein and all this other stuff And so we kind of walked through all of that. And that was just kind of a short little podcast. And as we do these, obviously, these are going to build as we learn more information. And then the week before that, we did kind of the first high-level overview. of the genius act the clarity act and then the two versions of essentially the clarity act that are currently in the senate and that that was kind of a prelude to the article that i wrote for the brownstone institute so tonight we're going to be talking about um i i wrote a like a twelve thousand word

article on genius and clarity and it's not just genius and clarity it's about political process itself it's about financial regulation it's about how the political process works i wanted it to be kind of the definitive thing and so i had actually submitted that to brownstone maybe on monday and then all this stuff happened with epstein i'm like man i've got to write something uh because i've been talking about it anyway about the hijacking of bitcoin uh and the context in the context of epstein and what we've what we've learned from that so i actually did a really uh i just kind of jammed through and wrote that article which was published today and is what we're going to be

talking about today um just as a reminder that part of the issue that we have here is we have politicians going around the country saying the war on crypto is over and the United States is going to lead the world in crypto. And in reality, what's happened is the war on crypto has actually been extended. You have People like Ian Freeman, who is in prison for eight years. He's literally in prison, federal prison right now for selling Bitcoin essentially without a license, even though he had an opinion letter stating he didn't need a license. And then on the other hand, you have banks. And in some cases I talked about, I think it's Wachovia was involved in

Wachovia, Wells Fargo, hundreds of billions of dollars of money laundering, billions of dollars, hundreds of billions of dollars in money laundering for cartels. No one went to jail. In the article that I wrote, the longer one, it's going to go into all of this to just explain because I want to change the way people even think about these We don't need the bills at all. bills. We don't need market structure and we certainly don't need market structure from the people that have crashed the dollar, added thirty eight trillion dollars in debt, tried to hide the Epstein files. The invisible hand, as Adam Smith described it, has worked well for hundreds of years. We don't need the visible hand of

Congress. And I kind of explain in the article what that looks like. But we still have our crypto prisoners of war. Ian's there. So I encourage you to go to freeiannow.org and sign the petition for encouraging Trump to pardon him. We have Roman Storm. We have Keone Rodriguez, Will Smith, the Samurai developers. We have basically open source developers that wrote code to protect our privacy and our Fourth Amendment right, who also got opinion letters stating that what they were doing was legal. And, you know, they were their trials occurred and they were sentenced publicly. under Trump since the war on crypto was declared over. So you may remember when Bush was on

that aircraft carrier and it said, you know, mission accomplished. I mean, this is kind of like, you know, the mission is most certainly was not accomplished. This is the same thing that's happened with this war on crypto. So on the show, we continue to advocate for these crypto but also highlight the fact that this the prisoners, crypto war isn't over. And then actually these bills, the Genius Act and the Clarity Act are an extension of it. These bills are actually adding surveillance and tracking to everything that we own and every financial transaction that we do. So they are the war on crypto. I saw, I think today, I don't know if it was a joke It's hard to process some of this stuff,

or not. but Kamala Harris has announced she's running again and the one of the things people say to me is well you know it's certainly better than if if kamala won and and honestly i can say with respect to this crypto stuff absolutely not If she won, she would have put in her own team of DEI incompetent people to build a CBDC from scratch, and they would screw it up, but it would never get implemented. Trump allowed the biggest technocrats in the world to come in and or captured existing successful private companies and put them under the regulation, tracking, and control of the federal government. Not that I would vote for any of it, but it isn't true that people...

I don't think people... can make that statement that it would have been better. Everybody gets into this, oh, well, it's a lesser of two evils. I mean, we buy into this propaganda, and then we accept it, and then it becomes demoralizing, and then each election becomes a bigger humiliation ritual than the one before it. So I put some of this in here. These are some memes that I created over the last few days. And if you're new, I'm going to explain some of this. I'm not intending to be hostile. There are some people that are like, well, why are you being so negative? Why don't you offer solutions? And if you're new to this podcast, I offer solutions all of the time. I mean, I wrote a book.

I ran for president. My wife and I have gone to twenty seven states, three countries, educating people about technocracy, the threat of technocracy, the threat of CBDCs, and then actually doing workshops on showing people how to use privacy coins like Zeno or to use privacy stable coins like Freedom Dollar, how to make their Bitcoin and Ethereum private with confidential layer, how we've built a global medical tourism marketplace so that you can escape the horrendous health care system that we have that bankrupts an American every minute and provides, you know, thirty eight ranked care with the highest cost in the world. You don't have to put up with any You can form a medical trust. of that.

You can cancel your insurance. You can use medical tourism and save eighty percent and get better health outcomes. So we're building solutions and also connecting to other people that have solutions. We're building tools to help people improve their sovereignty. But For the last seven years, I've been talking about how Bitcoin was hijacked. Others have been talking about it more. Certainly people like Roger Ver, who was at the front of it, who wrote the book that you can see behind me, Hijacking Bitcoin. And the people that have been speaking about this, that have the loudest voice, have been targeted by the federal government. They're either in federal prison.

Or they were facing, in Roger's case, one hundred nine years in federal prison. And and I believe it was for a combination of trying to speak the truth about this. But then also those people were working on alternative solutions that can help people to escape prison. central banks and and all of these other things so the people that had the loudest voice and the best voice they've been they've been silenced and so so i get when an opening comes up like this uh when what we know is that you know bitcoin got to where it was it was hijacked by epstein and others which i'll go into but it's been a massive campaign of propaganda and censorship People have been blocked, silenced.

You know, I wrote the other day, this guy, Adam Back, who it turns out is the head of Blockstream, a Bitcoin company heavily involved, works with Bitcoin core developers. He was involved and he was with Epstein and I believe on Epstein's Island. I mean, you know, and the Blockstream company that benefited by basically handicapping Bitcoin Bitcoin and making it slow and expensive and capping the block size so that Bitcoin can only do seven transactions per second. The people that formed the company to profit from that had the chairman of the Bilderberg Group, Jeffrey Epstein, and many others. This is the cast of characters of people that we now know explicitly were involved

in the hijacking of Bitcoin. And so most people don't know that. So if you're on my Twitter feed, there'll be Bitcoin maxis that are absolutely beside themselves. They're going nuts about this. And they don't want to hear about it because from their perspective, they see that it's causing the price to drop. But from my perspective, most people, we've gone to twenty seven different as I said, states. When I talk to people outside of a Twitter crypto bubble, ninety nine percent of people, ninety nine point nine percent of people don't know that Bitcoin is it was designed to be a currency. They don't know that people were using it to buy and sell things. They don't know that there was such a

thing as a block size war. They have no idea that Jeffrey Epstein had anything to do with it. And when I tell them that, they're shocked. I mean, seriously. And this has been going on now for three and a half years where we've been giving these talks. So what goes on online? So somebody will say, again, well, you're not providing any solutions or anything else. No, I've provided solutions. But right now is the moment for the truth to finally get out. that the people who've been trying to tell the story about Bitcoin being hijacked, that have been thrown in prison, threatened, and have not been able to speak because of the propaganda and censorship, this is the window to do that.

So I'm going to take advantage of that window. And I... In addition to the article and the interview I did with Jeffrey Tucker, I have a ton of interviews lined up. And I actually want to thank all of you because I know I've been getting a ton of inquiries. And last week, I said, listen, I need help. All of the podcasts that I've ever done on other shows, I never reached out to anybody and said, hey, have me on. It's all happened organically. People have reached out to me either because of... my writings or books or they've heard word of mouth or whatever. And, and so I'm pretty sure that, that some of these new podcasts that, that I'm going to be on over the

next couple of weeks are from you guys reaching out. And I encourage you to continue to do that. I think the way that we win is through truth and authenticity. I see people trying to get on this show all the time where I have what I think are fake agents. Cause it's like somebody that's got, well, here's this person with a little story. And then there's, you know, I think they had AI create a, you know, a fake, booking agent to come in and then they they write these like long paragraph things and it's like you know the first paragraph is always like well you know i saw your show on xyz so it's clear they scraped the title and then when you read the rest of it it's clear that

they didn't watch the podcast and have no idea what the podcast is about and the guest has nothing to do And that's what most of this is. And so most of a lot of the Internet traffic is fake. A lot of the stories are fake. We have a lot of bots. I think we win with authenticity. So please continue. And by the way, you have no idea how much power you have. You may not know, you know, whatever your favorite podcast is besides this one, of course. But, you know, your other favorite podcasts, you might think, well, I've never talked to this guy before, but still. If you're a listener and you're like, hey, I'm a listener. I like this. You don't have to know the person.

I got on Mike Adams this way. The person made the introduction, didn't have a personal relationship with Mike Adams, but was a longtime watcher. So thank you for that. And please continue to do it. We have a window of opportunity. to not only educate the public about Bitcoin, which is important and we'll talk about later, but also we have an opportunity now to get the word out about the Clarity Act. I think the Clarity Act actually can be stopped at this point simply because the Epstein stuff is so bad. And it even includes Coinbase now. The largest lobbyist for the Genius Act and the Clarity Act is Coinbase and their CEO, Brian Armstrong. and we now know you know epstein was

an early investor and you know there's a whole bunch of other stuff coming out there that really casts a lot of doubt on all of this and it's certainly you can make the argument that you know people were trying to claim that this guy the coinbase ceo was the champion for the little guy and fighting the big bad bankers at davos and it's and it's all it's all fake and now we can bring evidence into that this is another meme i put together Michael Saylor. I played this video clip and I posted it yesterday. I've played it on this show several times. It's a three minute and eighteen second I probably should have played it in the clip. intro instead of one of the songs.

It's Roger Ver talking for two minutes from Liberty Forum in like twenty twelve, twenty thirteen. And was one of the main reasons I got inspired to get into crypto. And he's talking about. This is going to enable people all over the world to engage in trade without banks, no friction. We won't be funding all these wars. Great energy. I mean, it was electrifying. I know several people that were in that room that day. That was like an electric thing. And then there's this video clip from Michael Saylor who says... Well, Bitcoin is not for competing with Visa or MasterCard or the dollar or the Euro. it's for complying with know your customer You know, It's for paying your taxes and everything

laws. else. To me, that three minute and eighteen second clip is all you need to know about the which is why I play it very often. hijacking of Bitcoin, But but now today, I think last I think there's a Wall Street Journal article on it. I'll have to check. Somebody sent it to me. I think perhaps. During the dot-com era, Michael Saylor lost more money in one day than anyone up to that point, kind of in history. He lost six billion dollars in one day. And I believe he might have actually beaten that today. So there's a Wall Street Journal article. Here we go. There we go. Yeah. Bitcoin boosters,

twelve billion dollar loss headlines, crypto's worst day since twenty twenty two crash. So Michael Saylor's strategy lost twelve billion dollars today. He two X'd his dotcom record loss. Yeah. Again, this is the guy that's the front for... He's the face for hijacked Bitcoin. And so it's all coming out. And this was inevitable, but I've been trying to warn people. Others have for a long time. And now we can start to provide some context to this. I'm going to be talking about the article Tonight, that I wrote, which is at Brownstone. You can actually see it at the Brownstone

Let me... site. it's actually on the front page so if you if you go to brownstone.org it's right on the front page called the hijacking of bitcoin and jeffrey put a nice little post out this article helped crash the market fascinating um again this isn't uh necessarily a really long and elaborate uh article like some of the other ones but what i put in there which we'll go through are the actual emails the actual smoking guns the other thing is and i'm going to post this on my x account tomorrow but i did an interview it's it's uh in case you didn't know because i it's new the brownstone institute has their own podcast now called the brownstone show so i encourage you to

check that out um really high quality stuff great guests jeffrey's awesome jeffrey's my favorite person to interview with i i've actually come to find I don't like actually preparing presentations. When I prepare presentations, it's too, I don't know, it's too extensive. It's kind of too forced. But like Jeffrey knows exactly how to move a conversation. And because he's smart, he knows what he's talking about. He can actually get to the really interesting bits. And so this interview was really interesting. important to me because I've known Jeffrey since probably twenty twelve, maybe around twenty thirteen, right around the when we learned about Bitcoin.

And Jeffrey is actually probably one of the most influential people in the world at opening up the original version of Bitcoin, the Bitcoin version that Roger Ver talked about. He wrote a book about it. And being an economist and someone that has great kind of stature and understanding about monetary policy and economics, he was able to describe the importance of Bitcoin from a monetary perspective and from an economic perspective. And that brought a lot of people in. And when I was doing the podcast with him, he discussed kind of the same thing that happened to me. Early on, there was all this excitement. People understood, at least seemed to have some kind of

understanding of how money worked and how this invention would work to be an improvement upon the existing system. And then all of a sudden, around twenty seventeen, the narrative would shift and then people would call Jeffrey and they would say, hey, Jeffrey, you know, we're not doing we're not doing this as peer to peer digital cash anymore. You didn't get the memo. You know, this is a store of value. And Jeffrey's like, well, that's not how it works. Something in order to be a store of it also needs to be a medium of value, exchange. And he's explaining these things. And then people are like discounting. what he has to say. And so for years, he got out of it then.

And I didn't get out of crypto then, but I did get out of Bitcoin then because I couldn't use it anymore. I was using it here in New Hampshire to go to stores, to go to restaurants. I was using it for political activism. I was actually raising money for a super PAC and paying activists using cryptocurrency. And then all of a sudden, the transactions were fifty dollars. They went from like a few pennies with transaction settling a minute or two to seven days to complete a transaction in fifty dollars. So I stopped using it because it wasn't useful. But then, you know, what we learn and Roger Veer had a front row seat to all of it as it was going on. There was a big debate internally, which is,

do we increase the size of these blocks, as was originally discussed in the paper, in the white paper, so that you can do more transactions that you can scale so you can compete with Visa or MasterCard? Do we do what the original plan was? Or all of a sudden, this new thing came in and said, well, no, we're going to keep it slow. And then we're going to build this thing called a second layer solution. And all of a sudden, we're going to start calling it digital gold. So all of a sudden, they're not listening to Jeffrey. And Jeffrey's like... And then you're kind of an outcast if you hold this view that you should be using these things as digital cash. And so now... It's all come full circle.

I mean, we knew kind of what the inevitably was going to happen. as we've watched this the last few days, But, you know, you know, at one point today, Bitcoin was sixty one thousand something. It was seventy two thousand yesterday. I mean, it's crashed. The all time high was one hundred twenty six thousand dollars. And it's related to. Well, I like to put it this way. So once you understand that. Bitcoin was hijacked and can't be used as digital cash without using these other things that actually involve KYC and they don't actually even work. Then you're down to, okay, is it effective digital gold? So the reason I think that the price

has dropped as much as it has in the last few weeks or months is twofold. One, it was presented as digital gold, but silver and gold were outperforming Bitcoin. So it turns out that I think most people are starting to wake up to the fact that the dollar is... is failing. And so most people are saying, well, I'm not going to hold my money in a bank account that I don't own and earn point one percent interest. What am I going to do here? Where am I going to store my value? And it turns out increasingly people are not deciding to choose bitcoin despite the fact all of the branding and all the propaganda is digital gold so as as gold went above five

thousand dollars an ounce as silver went above a thousand a hundred dollars an ounce people are like well you know their their strategy was to way to cope with it was to say well it's going to cycle back in you know people are going to take their profits from gold and silver and put it into bitcoin well that didn't happen So then people are kind of like, uh-oh, is this thing actually a good store of value? Then the Epstein information comes out. And what that does is it casts doubt on... even the whole transition to it becoming a store of value. Now I understand, and if you're new to this podcast, you may not have heard of any of this before. You may be like most of the people

that I've spoken to as we've traveled. You didn't know people were using Bitcoin to buy airline tickets through Expedia or to buy furniture at overstock.com or to buy things at Microsoft. You probably have never heard of that before. Most people that I've spoken to in the United States only know of Bitcoin as being a speculative asset or this digital gold thing. Well, now people are saying, well, is it a good store of value? And the fact that it's not doing well against silver and gold is one thing, but then you dig deeper and I'm kind of front running going through the article here, but what you find is is that all of the main shift here

happened in twenty seventeen. Epstein funded the developers that kind of cemented the technical changes to make Bitcoin slow and expensive and not usable as digital cash. And then the price went up. So the price was going up for Bitcoin largely because people were starting to in twenty seventeen, use it as a currency. But then when it became unusable, the price dropped. But then the price went back up again. It went up huge. Well, it turns out the University of Texas at Austin did a study of this that at least fifty percent of the increase in the price of Tether, I mean, excuse me, of Bitcoin was due to Tether. And

It appears as though, based on the fact that they weren't able to pass an audit and were found to not have the necessary assets back in the stable coin, that they were printing Tether out of thin air and then using it to inflate the price of Bitcoin. So in other words, they manufactured the technical changes and the narrative change to say that Bitcoin is a store of value. And then they artificially pumped the price of Bitcoin to get people to believe it. Well, now that we know that and we put all these pieces together, now that people are seeing today, nine years later, that it's not holding up relative to gold And now we go back and look back and silver. and we can see the history of this

and the history of it suggests that the whole thing was fake. that puts significant pressure and doubt on bitcoin and and i will say this the price of bitcoin may go back up uh you know i'm not giving financial advice but i in order for it to go up in my opinion it would have to be based on either fraud or force And when I say force, it force in the sense that it would have to be governments forcing their citizens to buy it through taxation. Or it would be through, you know, continuing to push this fake narrative and then to get financial advisors to have for one case and pension funds and so forth by it. Now, I will tell you on that front,

based simply on the volatility, if you are somebody that manages a pension fund. for an organization, maybe it's government employees or whatever it happens to be. And you're sitting around and you're trying to figure out how you're going to allocate your assets. And somebody is going to say, hey, this thing's lost fifty percent of its value in a few months. And now people are saying that Jeffrey Epstein is involved. Well, these are risk managers. And to be honest with you, like when you're trying to balance risk reward, the reward part doesn't look very appealing here. Now that Bitcoin is a trillion dollar asset, in order for the price to move, you actually have to have pretty

significant volume and you have to have people that are willing to invest quite a bit of money to push the needle. Well, where's that money going to come from? And if it's not going to come from institutional sources, and it looks like they're not going to do a Bitcoin strategic reserve with taxpayer money, they've stated, the Treasury Secretary has stated he's going to continue to confiscate Bitcoin through civil asset forfeiture. They're going to continue to steal Bitcoin from our friends. I mean, you know, Ian Freeman has had, I don't even know, five, ten million dollars worth of his Bitcoin stolen. And when they raided him before he was even convicted or had his sentencing

hearing, they confiscated all of his. Ledger drives and so forth. And I believe he actually had to sign a deal where, you know, even if he loses or even if he wins, they still confiscated his crypto. Ross Ulbricht, who, you know, received a pardon and arguably, you know, maybe he's entitled to that money, to those Bitcoin. He's certainly not going to get it, but that's the bulk of the three hundred twenty five thousand Bitcoin that the U.S. government has. There's another chunk of this, which was from a hack from a crypto exchange. Well, you might say, well, why don't they give that? Shouldn't they be giving the crypto? If there was a hack, wouldn't they give the Bitcoin back to the

people that it was stolen from? And no, they just kept it. And so this leads to another point that a lot of people don't understand, which is that Bitcoin is not anonymous. So there are a lot of people that like to push this idea of, well, not my keys, not my coin. You can't physically take my Bitcoin. This is one of the big features of it. The problem is that because it's all on an open ledger and for the last twelve years, a company called Chainalysis has been working with exchanges and law enforcement all over the world to build a database tracking everybody's transactions. So it's pretty easy for them to find out. And once they find out one transaction, they can find out all of the other

transactions. So if that's the case, so if they come to you and they we've got proof that this is yours, say, hey, listen, you can decide to not give up your keys, but they'll throw you in prison. And this is essentially what has happened. So the way they've ended up getting this cryptocurrency is by being able to say, to defendants or whoever it happens to be or whether people are guilty or not. We know these are yours. You're going to either give them to us or you're going to spend more time in And so, so far, jail. there aren't a lot of brave souls that I'm not going to give you my keys. have said, well, And so a lot of people online will say, well, I would never give up my keys.

The people whose keys, the people whose crypto they've confiscated, these are really smart people. These are people that were ahead of the curve and were involved in Bitcoin like, fifteen years ago and that, you know, probably have IQs over one-forty. So, you know, so there may be some guy out there that mined Bitcoin fifteen years ago, has never done a transaction with anybody that can be traced, and so he can say, well, you know, I've got, you know, all these things set up, they're not going to take my Bitcoin. That's irrelevant to the general proposition of whether Bitcoin can be tracked for normal users. So... So in any event, when you come back to this, it's like,

okay, it can be tracked. The store value argument doesn't seem to be holding up given that it's lost about fifty percent of its value. In order for the store value to work, a lot of money needs to come in. And because of the volatility in the Epstein thing, who is that going to be at this Who's going to want to risk doing this? point? What's the upside in taking that risk? particularly in light of the fact that gold and silver have done better. So my statement to you, if you're sitting out there saying, well, it's going to go up in value and so on and so forth, based on what? Why would it? Why? It hasn't really demonstrated that the hijacked use case is actually a viable one

in times of economic turbulence. So I'll get into the article here. I mean, I've already gone through the big points, but as I go through the article, what I'll show you are the actual tweets. That's the, or excuse me, not the tweets, That's the real, the emails. Fun part of this exercise. I will say before I get into that, I have done a ton of other interviews. I don't even have them all in here. But I encourage you to look at the episode that I did with Paul Barron called Crypto Clarity Dead on Arrival. Why that one was really important to me is this guy has two hundred two point two million subscribers and I've never been on a show before. Don't know anybody in his audience.

And the comments were overwhelmingly positive. And what that told me is. Most people out there sense that what they're being told on these crypto shows and podcasts about why we need this regulation. Most people sense that it's BS, but they don't know why it's BS. And I just laid it all out. And so that's why that one is a good one. I was on with Meryl Nass of CHDTV. That was another great interview. And I'm grateful to have her support, particularly given her leadership and knowledge that's vast on a whole variety of different issues related to technocracy, globalization, food freedom, and so forth. And I have some podcasts.

I can't say who they are with yet, but I have some really big podcasts coming up over the next week or two that are from people that I've never been on before. And we will reach a completely new audience. You know, we're talking about, you know, one of them is someone with a million followers, but is very, very much in the mainstream of what's going on. And we're going to be able to, to talk about these issues. This is, I want to say that if you watched my feed for, What's happening now, and by the way, Bitcoin maxis have not wanted to debate me or have me on their shows at all. One of Roger's friends offered Adam Back a

half a million dollars to debate him on hijacking Bitcoin after the book came out, and Adam Back refused. I have been blocked by Max Keiser, Michael Saylor, most of the Bitcoin core devs, so forth the guy who wrote the bitcoin standard all of it they have lists of people that they suppress part of their whole strategy has been hey we've got this new narrative if we can just control the narrative and we're the ones that are getting on tv cnbc and everything else and we're building this big kind of cult around this we'll just shut off the people have the alternative opinion or which is actually the truth which at some level they they know then maybe we'll keep the

story going maybe we'll keep the the pump alive and now people want answers so now all of a sudden these bitcoin maxis are engaging now all of a sudden they're dming me now i'm having you know people say things like oh well i'll debate anyone on this like this guy simon dixon and everything else here's and here's my view on this i certainly will not turn away a debate but For the next two to three weeks, I'm not going to do any debates because I don't really care about Bitcoin maxis or the Bitcoin maxi community. First of all, it's small. Secondly, it operates like a religious cult. So the percentage chance that you're going to change somebody's mind is really small.

Who needs to hear this message is the general public. And I'm saying this from my own experience, knowing that from all the talks that I've done, and when I do talks, they're not with average people. These are with people that are maybe recently awake, but generally intelligent people. They haven't heard of any of this. I want to go to those people. I don't want to waste my time in squabbles. I will do the debates, but it's not going to be for two to three weeks because we have a window here. between the first Brownstone article, the next Brownstone article is going to go out, and all of these other interviews, we've got an opportunity to tell our side of the story.

And I don't want to get bogged down in petty BS or to try to, frankly, salvage people's reputations, which may be irretrievable. If these people at this point, as you start to see... what actually happened with this hijacking of Bitcoin and Epstein, if these people continue to try to do mental gymnastics to justify all this stuff, then at some point at the end of it, when it all comes down, people will never trust those people again. Particularly if it then comes out during part of this process that they actually did know and actively suppressed it. That is going to be another big deal, too. My job in life is not to protect

the reputation of Bitcoin maxis who have been lying to people. So with that said, I'll do debates. But even if you're listening to this, because some of you will tag me and say, you should do a debate with this. Know that my position is I certainly will do a debate, but not for two to three weeks because this is our opportunity to explain what's going on without the noise and the have fun staying poor and diamond hands and all of the cult behavior that goes on around it. This is the opportunity to frame this from the standpoint of the truth and the standpoint of the facts. By the way, this is part of the reason I'm doing this technocracy atlas because I'm sick of

these arguments where somebody said, well, this guy did this, this guy did this. How about we put all the evidence there How about this? and then everybody can look at the evidence and can discuss the evidence and then contribute additional information? How about we actually focus on the truth and putting out primary source information? So that's kind of the thing on that. So if you see me, so just understand my position is going to be two to three weeks. We'll do some debates. in addition to the interviews I have lined Now, up, I'm going to be traveling. This is another part of it as well. I'm going to be traveling for the next two weeks. So I'm going to be in Mexico next

Thursday at Monerotopia. So I'll be at Monerotopia next week. And then the following week, I'll be at Anarchapoco and at the Crypto Vigilante Summit. Now, I'm looking forward to both of these. And I actually think the timing is great for both of these events because I've been to Monerotopia. And most of the people... I mean, it's Mineratopia. This is a privacy coin-focused conference. But I remember being there... Fifteen months ago. The last time they had it was in... November. And I remember being at a table debating with people. I was actually... I had made the... connection that I thought Epstein was involved in it. And people were trying to say, well, no, he wasn't.

And they were trying to frame it as a conspiracy theory. Well, I've got news for them. And I know some of those people are still going to be there. It is no longer a conspiracy theory. So for me, it's going to be very interesting to see If you're not willing to change your position in light of new information, then that's really interesting knowledge, right? And there's a certain degree to which you can't spend time on those people. You just have to move on and have... A different conversation. A lot of what happens is, you know, I'll say something like, hey, Pete, you should read hijacking Bitcoin or whatever. And then somebody will say, well, Roger was wrong or Roger's just doing this

you know, about so he can promote Bitcoin cash. Roger, the last time I saw Roger do an interview was on Tucker Carlson and he was talking about Zeno and confidential layer. Roger has been about... What got me into crypto was his speech about peer-to-peer digital cash and what it means for economic freedom and for getting rid of the violence and everything that comes about when people have central banks and these debt-based systems. That is what Roger has been about. I've seen it. I mean, I've watched him. I don't know him that well personally, but I have followed what he has been doing. He's got a body of work and it's impressive. And so I'll debate with people and they're

this is just about Bcash or whatever. like, well, And so most of the people's complaints are like, well, you held this different position on this thing at some point in time. It's like, well, no, the mission's always been peer-to-peer digital cash. You experiment with things. Markets are about experimentation and trying new things. Some of them work, some of them don't. You test a lot of things, you learn, and you move on. That's how it works. And a lot of people are like, well, wait, you tried this one thing, and it got hijacked, and you're not sticking with that. Well, what's wrong with you? Well, it got hijacked. It's not doing the thing that it was supposed to do. So, anyway.

Why would you? So, Anarchapoca will be another... good good event and you know as i think about it when i was at mineratopia last ross olbrich was still in prison and roger was was in spain and so you know sometimes when i was reflecting on even what my talk was going to be about sometimes it seems like a lot that there's not a lot going on and then you know but in reality there's a lot going on and when you when you can do a bit of a look back even six months or twelve months there are some good things happening I'm going to be in Portugal at the After that, Parallel Society Conference, which should be really interesting as well. That's in Lisbon. I know some people have reached out to

me because they've heard me talk about this in this podcast. So I know there are some of you that are actually going to be able to attend some of these events. So it'll be great to see some of you in person. And then lastly, we have the Libertarian National Convention, May the twenty first to the twenty fifth. And so there's going to be a whole crypto corner there right off of the main area for the convention. And so I'm going to be there talking about the Daylight projects and OSR and the Technocracy Atlas and all the things that we're doing. And Zeno is going to be there. Confidential Layer is going to be there. And so I'm excited about that because obviously this is a big event.

drawing libertarians from around the country so all right we'll get into it what i'm going to do i have these slides but i don't even think they're i'm just going to pull up the the actual article because i don't think the slides are necessarily all that meaningful in this respect so let me bear with me here one second Oh, and by the way, I mean, I'm wearing these glasses and I've talked to you guys about Jack Cruz. Jack Cruz has now put out two posts calling me a retard. And this is part of the point of So these are a lot of Bitcoin maxis this. that won't engage previously. And now they're doing name calling. He didn't like a post that I did about the guy who wrote...

bitcoin standard he he didn't dispute any of the facts um but but he just went to to name calling and so look i still respect the work that he's done um on on light and mitochondria and health but i think he's dead wrong on bitcoin absolutely dead wrong on bitcoin And I'm even questioning and looking into when did he even get involved in Bitcoin? Because he didn't even start talking about this until like, he claims he got involved in I have no idea if that's true. I have no idea. I did an entire podcast based on a theory that he had. And his theory was that Meyer Lansky was basically doing the money laundering for

the Jewish mafia involved with a lot of the casinos and everything else. And it's kind of a more elaborate story. And they learned about how the Federal Reserve was hijacked and ended up having a lot of leverage with FDR's administration, other administrations, so on and so forth. And his claim was that they were instrumental at working with a guy named Dave Chom to create a cryptocurrency before Bitcoin. And that project failed, but that this guy Len Sassaman, who he claims is Satoshi... you know, kind of gave the big middle finger to both the mafia and the CIA and created Bitcoin as something that couldn't be controlled by either of those groups. I mean, look, it's a great sounding story.

The problem is you can't prove, he can't prove, um, any of these points. He can't prove Lansky's involvement with Dave Chum, and it can't prove that Sassaman is Satoshi. And I asked him about it. I'm not saying that what he's saying is wrong, but it's kind of like I suspected that Epstein funded this because at least there was a track of he gave money to the MIT group that did fund these things. I didn't even realize it was as direct as here's an email that says, here are the developers that this is funding. But he has no evidence of this. But his conclusion is, because he's made this construction that is not provable, that Len Sassaman is Satoshi, and because,

based on his view of this, Sassaman developed Bitcoin in such a way that it couldn't be controlled by the CIA... or the mafia, that it is the end all be all and therefore is the only digital currency. his story could be completely true. Well, I will tell you, Those could be the players, but the design of Bitcoin could still be flawed. It's still not privacy by default. He may have been able to develop this outside of the, even if what he says is true and Sassman developed this outside of the control of those organizations, it's still flawed. It still doesn't function in its hijacked form as digital gold or peer-to-peer cash. In its current form, it doesn't work.

So he's holding on to and he's calling everybody, are you a savage? If you haven't heard what Uncle Jack said, Uncle Jack, your shit can't be proven. So my position on this is we're going to... If you can't prove it, it didn't happen. But I don't even need you to prove it. I don't need you to prove who Satoshi was to tell you why Bitcoin isn't working as a store of value. So expect a lot of... a lot of spice, but a lot of this cult stuff where it's like, well, because he said this, he doesn't have any proof of it. And when I did my podcast on this, I wasn't adversarial. In fact, I wasn't even adversarial with him when I was posting. I actually just challenged him to find the

fault in the information that I put out, and he refused. He decided to call me a retard instead. And and now other people are calling in and say, oh, this guy, what does he know? he's he's not a savage or whatever. You know, And it's just it's just it's ridiculous And frankly, behavior. I wonder maybe this guy's a psyop. Because one of the things that you do if you're trying to deflect people is you tell them something that's eighty percent true where it seems feasible. And then the other twenty percent is either unknowable or fake. Maybe he knows and maybe it's true and maybe it's not. And now you have a whole cult of people that are buying what he's saying about this.

We have to call all of that out. And I'm actually encouraging all of you to do this. This is the time where we focus on the truth and on information. And I don't care what people push back on, if it's going to be name calling or, you know, trying to, you know, most of these people like, oh, you've probably never coded anything. You're probably just a no coin. I was involved with Bitcoin before probably ninety five percent. They have no idea even what they're talking about. But and you don't have to engage in every, Um, every fight that's out there, but these maxis have dominated the landscape and the framework on all of this the entire time. They censored people from Reddit.

Then they engage in all of these various activities, which we now know are even more, uh, kind of ominous with epstein connections and everything else and so there's no reason to put up with any of this and there's no reason to stay quiet and frankly the fact that people like roger can't speak so that means you know we all need to more people should read hijacking bitcoin and then more people should be talking about hijacking bitcoin share the knowledge that you learn because our a team the people that that know the most about this that were there that have been fighting for this the whole time they're still either suppressed or they're in prison still and that should be enough that

people should be you know roger veer was into it was completely vindicated this week so anyway with that said um let me see if uh How the screen is going here. All right. We've got the article up. Good. So the article is on Brownstone. It's called The Hijacking of Bitcoin. And I'm sure I've probably already talked about all of this. Bitcoin was supposed to be digital cash. Again, And then it was hijacked. And what we learned is there was this fight over the block size. And again, I encourage you to read Roger's book, Hijacking Bitcoin. And, you know, Roger argues that the original vision was deliberately buried so that Bitcoin could

turn into something easier for the big institutions to control. And most of Hijacking Bitcoin, I mean, it talks about quite a bit of detail. And the thing about the book is that it's not like Roger just like telling a the references, story. Most of the information there, the evidence sources, are the actual people that engaged in the hijacking in their own words, from emails, from discussion boards, from threads. It's not Roger narrating a story. So, for instance, if somebody says, well, the reason, you know, if you want to look at the mechanics of how did they end up with small blocks and how did they end up with a system where if you wanted to get your transaction done with these

artificially small blocks you'd have a a system where you would kind of bid uh called replace by fee he shows the documentation with messages from a guy named john dylan who was tied to the intelligence community paying one of the developers peter todd to make one of those changes that's that's an example of the kind of thing that's in this book. And he has a discussion in there of who some of the people are that were involved in Blockstream and what that was all about. You had some Bitcoin core developers that formed a for-profit company that had these investors that were tied to traditional finance and their entire business model was based on generating fees

that would only be possible by basically handicapping Bitcoin and making it so it could only do seven transactions per second. All of that is meticulously documented. And in fact, no one's refuted it. I got blocked from a lot of people just for writing a small, like one paragraph thing saying you should read the book and then Roger retweeted it. And then a bunch of people just blocked me. Nobody even engaged with me on it. So one of the things that Roger talks about is in the process of... like the block size wars, there was complete suppression of any opposing views to the small blockers, literally kicking people off of Reddit, which was the main channel where people

would discuss these things. And Roger didn't start Bitcoin Cash. Roger was originally not sure which way he was going to go. And what Roger knows, which I think we all now know, at this point which because this is kind of a universal thing the people who are censored are usually the people who are right and so i think there's just kind of an instinctual thing well hey maybe i should look into this right it probably it probably piqued his curiosity and then my book and some of the subsequent articles extended kind of what he was doing and i i threw in this epstein angle and where the epstein angle came in was What I saw that the same MIT group that had taken over funding the developers

also worked on all three US CBDC pilots. So my kind of position on this was, what's going on with CBDCs? How far advanced are they? And it turns out that it's the same story. It's the same players. And I didn't know that at first. And so now it's become like, wow, now we're like, we're just talk about being able to put all of the different pieces together. And so... So as I'm going through the article, so Jeffrey Epstein gave MIT eight hundred and fifty thousand dollars over the years, including five hundred and twenty five thousand dollars to the digital currency initiative. So where that piqued my interest is the digital currency initiative within MIT worked on three CBDC pilots.

Project Hamilton, which is the retail CBDC. It's basically the digital dollar. It's what would replace cash. Project Cedar, which is what's called a wholesale CBDC. This is for banks to do large volume with each other. It's used for cross-border transactions. And then this thing, and this is what really took me aback, which is called regulated liability network. And this was a pilot between MIT and the New York Fed and a whole bunch of other financial institutions to basically create a platform for tokenizing all of our assets and making it so that all of those assets can only be settled using CBDCs, but it connects all of the central banks and all of the CBDCs globally.

All of that came out of this MIT group. All of that came out of the digital currency initiative. But it turns out, so kind of the story here is you have, and I'll take a step back. I'll have to do another podcast just about Brock Pierce again. I have done one on him, but now there's like massive amounts of information. And in fact, I probably should put it on Technocracy Atlas. I first learned about Brock Pierce when I started my first company and I was taking my company public and I had engaged an investment bank called Lazard Frere. to do the IPO. And we were going to be the second IPO that they did, internet IPO. This is a prestigious investment bank.

They had this other company in front of us called DEN, Digital Entertainment Network. And I didn't know who he was at the time. I didn't actually know any of the backstory, but the CEO of that company was Brock Pierce. Well, my company didn't end up going public because Brock's company ended up involved in a scandal involving sex trafficking, allegations and things involving boys and so on and so forth. And so the founders and people had to leave the country and go to Spain. Their IPO was pulled. It tainted the reputation of the investment bank. And then they didn't do our IPO. And so our IPO was shelved. We missed the entire window. This probably cost me twenty or fifty million dollars.

Like this is not. And I didn't know at the time who Brock Pierce was, but I knew I'm like, God, you know, what the hell? Because honestly, these kinds of sex scandals, those this is like the late nineties, early two thousand. Like that wasn't a that wasn't as popular a thing, I guess, as popular as it's become now. So it was a pretty, pretty big deal at the time. And I didn't even associate. Thank you. the name with it. And so, so Brock Pierce goes from that somehow ends up getting involved as a CEO of some gaming company that Steve Bannon ends up becoming the CEO of, by the way, after Brock was the CEO of it. And some of this timing becomes really interesting.

And then it turns out that Brock, I didn't even know if this is the first time he met him, but was at a conference, not on Epstein's Island, but on a different Island in twenty eleven with Epstein. And at that point, he seems to begin to start advising the Jeffrey Epstein on Crypto Matters. So understand this. So he effectively starts becoming his crypto advisor, becomes Jeffrey Epstein's crypto advisor after Epstein had already been convicted. And now all of a sudden, Brock Pierce is in here advising him on this. And I haven't even gone through all of the emails. But when I say advise, I'm not even talking about like, there are one or two emails back and forth.

I mean, there's stuff with, you know, and I don't even want to go into this stuff, but there's like a post with a whole bunch of pictures of Ukrainian, I believe Ukrainian girls. There is some of that stuff that's part of it, and I don't even want to dwell on that. What I want to focus on are things like what we found... Well, this is the most important one, which is this is the email from Jeffrey Epstein to Joy Ito, who's the head of the MIT group. And he says, Gavin is clever. Joy says, used gift funds to underwrite this, which allowed us to move quickly and win this round. Thanks. OK, well, what is it that the money was earmarked for?

All right, here we go. The way that Bitcoin is organized currently is that there are five core developers and around a hundred contributors to the core code. The five core developers are like Linus Torvalds of Linux. They decide what changes are made. One of the five is lead developer, Vladimir, and one is chief scientist, Gavin. So Gavin, Vladimir, and Corey, an important contributing developer are were being paid out of a nonprofit organization called the Bitcoin Foundation. A few weeks ago, it blew up when one of the board members declared the foundation bankrupt. And so many organizations scrambled to step in the vacuum created by the foundation and take control of the developers.

We moved quickly... talking to all the various stakeholders and the three developers decided to join the media lab this is a big win for us all right now so here's some interesting information for you so we know that brock pierce is essentially epstein's um crypto advisor brock pierce was the chairman of the bitcoin foundation when this happened So Brock Pierce is the one kind of driving this train. Now, you may have noticed there's Bruce Fenton, who I know and have been friendly with. And he had the Project Ravencoin and everything else. Bruce Fenton was the executive director of the Bitcoin Foundation. So you'll see him.

The one thing that I have noticed is he'll try to dispel this. The first time that I talked about this and tried to make these connections, he said it was a conspiracy theory. Then when this email came out, he said, well, this is old news. I guarantee you it's not old news to ninety nine point nine nine percent of the people on the planet. But but now he's out doing more damage control. But the one thing that he never says when he's doing the damage control is that he was the executive director while this was happening. So I point that out to you because you might want to ask him about that. I find that to be very interesting. So Epstein's funding. was earmarked and used to fund these three

developers. Now, what did these three developers end up working on? They ended up working on Segwit. They ended up working on Lightning Network. Now, but I want to say something in terms of timing. And I don't know if I have that email in here. Let me see if this one's in here. There's so much to put together. Oh, I do have the email. All right. So this email that I just described is from April the twenty fifth, twenty fifteen. Now we're going to go to this other email. This email is from before that time. This email is from July the fifteenth twenty fourteen. So this so this email is like what eight months earlier. So this is an email between Jeffrey

Epstein or it's to Jeffrey Epstein and Joy Ito. And then whatever, some other things. This is the email addresses from a guy named Austin Hill. Austin Hill is one of the founders of Blockstream. And carbon copied on this are Hammy Hill, which I believe is the CFO of Blockstream, and Adam Back. Okay, so Adam Back, I believe, was the CEO of Blockstream at this time. So this is eight months before Epstein's money is earmarked to fund the Bitcoin developers to work on Lightning Network and Segwit, essentially permanently crippling it for this digital gold company. narrative to, you know,

and then this idea, OK, well, then we'll build these second layer solutions. But eight months before that, there's this email that says, Hey, Joy and Jeffrey, We are down to the wire on closing this round. We are ten times oversubscribed on an eighteen million seed round and Reid, Reid Hoffman from LinkedIn, at the last minute told us to bump your allocation from fifty thousand to five hundred thousand. This is causing no small amount of headaches, but Blank and I respect you both and have learned so much from you in our discussions. We have everyone else make a haircut to make room. So in this email, eight months before MIT takes over the

devs, cementing the absolute crippling of the L-I, they invested five hundred thousand dollars. in blockstream and remember blockstream is that second layer company is the second layer company that uh makes tran you know makes its profit off of transactions on this second layer so so we did not know the timetable and the level to which this was involved. But Epstein actually had a financial interest himself that then benefited from him taking over and controlling the devs. But it gets even more interesting than this. So we mentioned who the three devs are, Gavin, Vladimir, and Corey. Corey is a guy by the name of Corey Fields.

Corey ends up moving, or he moved away from or was doing this at the same time. Corey became one of the co-authors of Project Hamilton. So he was actually a main developer of the retail CBDC project, the collaboration between MIT and the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. So what does this mean? There are people out there that were saying, well, the right side won, and we needed to do this so that ultimately this lightning network would be what would be used to do peer-to-peer cash, and that would be the ultimate solution. But in reality, I think they knew it wasn't going to

work intentionally, and they actually peeled the developer off and had him work on a CBDC project. The CBDC project, Project Hamilton, does one point eight million transactions per second. So Bitcoin, they stuck Bitcoin at seven transactions per second and then successfully developed a CBDC that does one point eight million transactions per second. So this is actually how interconnected this is. And there are even it doesn't even stop here. I'm not going to go. I need more visuals to actually kind of map all of the rest of this out. There's something, and I made this insight, I don't usually go here, right? You will not hear me talking about the

Rothschilds or the Rockefellers. And it's not for any particular reason other than, I mean, actually, I think there's been enough propaganda that if you're talking about that, then you're either anti-Semitic or there's some other, you know, thing you get kind of labeled in this category or you're way off tinfoil hat, right? Yeah. And so I wouldn't normally talk about it at all. I've never talked about it. Well, in this instance, we found in some of the other emails, Jeffrey Epstein was actually managing money for the Rothschild family. He was paid twenty five million dollars to manage tech investments on behalf of the Rothschild family. So there's an email between Epstein and

Peter Thiel where he says, as you may or may not know, I manage money for the Rothschild family. This is why when I said in the introduction, the most interesting thing about these files isn't the sex trafficking. It's who is Epstein a front for and what is the actual agenda? Now, this I'm going to state. As I state this, this is completely a theory. But there's something really interesting that I've noticed about this. When you read other emails, Jeffrey Epstein mostly just was involved in short-term trading of Bitcoin. He didn't actually hodl. So to the extent that he actually, the one interview he did on this topic,

he said Bitcoin was a store of value and not to be used as a currency. And despite the fact that he funded Bitcoin, making it so that Bitcoin was a store of value and couldn't be used as peer-to-peer cash, he didn't actually hodl. So that's kind of interesting. I mean, that speaks to me directly of the idea of hijacking, right? It's like, well, yeah, this is a store of value. I'm just not going to store value here. All I'm going to do is do a little bit of short-term trading on this. I find that to be interesting. And the real big conspiracy part of this, which... So... There are some people that speculate that the Rothschilds own, some people claim they own all of the central banks.

That's clearly not true in a lot of different instances. But it's conceivable that they do have a position, but it's kind of like, as I was describing earlier, Epstein's name isn't on here. MIT went out of their way to hide Epstein's involvement. So you're not going to see, oh, thank you to Jeffrey Epstein for funding the digital currency group. when um epstein invested in coinbase he didn't invest in his own name he invested through brock pierce's company So it's conceivable that the Rothschilds actually do own, through other entities and other relationships, banks that own chunks of these central banks. We wouldn't know or be able to calculate

what effect that is. But I will tell you, if that did turn out to be the case, if the Rothschilds do own through their ownership of through various entities, the banks that make up the Federal Reserve, they would directly benefit from Bitcoin being hobbled and they would directly benefit from Project Hamilton because Project Hamilton is a direct retail CBDC. So I'm throwing that out there and I'm flagging it and I'm saying that that part of it is a conspiracy. Everything else I've talked about is documented fact. through this but this is this is what i'm saying this story keeps on getting worse i mean when i talked about it when i wrote my original article about

this a couple years ago um it wasn't like this bad it wasn't this ancestors it wasn't he's profiting off of blockstream he invested in blockstream and then they engineered taking over the development and it just so happens that the person that was the chair of the bitcoin foundation when it failed happens to be the guy that's advising jeffrey epstein on all crypto matters We did not know all of that. We did not know Brock Pierce's involvement in a whole bunch of things. And as I said, I'm trying to prioritize my time. So I want to focus because it's particularly relevant now on the hijacking of Bitcoin as it relates to the context of CBDCs.

But it also relates to Tether. So we'll get to that. So this is kind of the documented proof here. So we know Epstein is in Blockstream. We know Epstein funded the Bitcoin Core developers. We know one of the Bitcoin Core developers went on to be the co-author of the U.S. retail CBDC. white paper. Now, we have Brock Pierce in this, and we know that Brock Pierce personally brokered Epstein's three million dollar investment in Coinbase in late twenty fourteen. So remember this. So even when I was studying this earlier, like I could dig up that, you know, Epstein made one comment in twenty seventeen about this. But like, you know, there was no outward evidence that I mean, for all we know,

it's possible that Epstein just became interested recently in digital currencies and made this general check to MIT kind of as a way to start learning about cryptocurrency. Now we know he's been involved in it since twenty eleven. I mean, think about that. He was an investor in Coinbase twelve years ago. Three million dollars he invested. And here's the email from Brock Pierce. to Jeffrey Epstein. So the email down here is, okay, Fred is in New York today. I need to get back to them ASAP to let them know if I'm just participating for the smaller amount, if you aren't interested, can you talk?

Epstein writes, take three million. Done. We'll follow up shortly. So there you have it. And this broke, I think, just two days ago. So keep in mind, you know, normally you might be like, well, why does that even matter? Well, it matters when it turns out that the largest lobbyist, the largest organization lobbying for the Genius Act and the Clarity Act is Coinbase. So if you want to see how all of this stuff works, fits together. And it goes on and on. Like I said, I'm still trying to process all the documents. I'm literally right now downloading other sets of documents so that I can get all three and a half million pages into the system. So I haven't even been able to search

for... I have no idea what we're going to find. We haven't even scratched part of the surface of all of this and i've been floored i mean i have some other theories that maybe i'll share and again when i do this i want to tell you which ones are theories and which ones aren't but there's been some stuff kind of nagging at me for a long time um about steve bannon and some other people as it relates to crypto and some of the other things that i've talked about which i'll get to later uh but it it you know some of the other things that came out of the emails um Pierce sat down with former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers and described himself at that meeting at Epstein's

mansion as the most active investor in Bitcoin. Summers saw potential but worried aloud about getting involved could destroy his reputation because of Bitcoin's wild price swings. Pierce even told Summers, you're going to have some low quality characters playing early in the space. Pierce is saying this. I mean, this is rich. We've got Pierce and Epstein talking about low quality characters. I'd be really interested to find out who it is they think are low-quality characters, by the way, because there may be a whole new level of hell that we're unfamiliar with here. So Pierce kept a relationship going, tons of emails back and forth, emailing casually about getting others

involved in Tether. In fact, he had emailed Epstein about trying to have Epstein help him get Summers involved in Tether. Now, I want to remind you of this. Brock Pierce was a co-founder of Tether. Now, I don't have any evidence of this yet, but I think it's really possible, if not probable, that through some investment vehicle, possibly Brock, that Epstein is an early investor in Tether. In fact, I think that that's likely. They're doing all of these deals together. And then what Brock goes and starts something called Tether that's a currency. And then he's emailing Epstein about it. And what? Epstein's not going to be an investor. It would actually be unlikely that Epstein

is not an investor. And there are emails going back to twenty fourteen with Pierce and Epstein talking about Tether. The one I've been able to find so far involves trying to get Larry Summers involved. So Pierce is the bridge. He's even kind of referred to as his elf or something like that in one of the email exchanges. I think Epstein referred to him as that. So literally, the relationship here isn't, well, we just did some emails back and forth. Literally, Brock Pierce was... When you think about that, you have Brock Pierce as a front... with all his background and baggage, for Jeffrey Epstein, who's a front for the Rothschilds. This is literally what's going on here. I mean, can you...

I would never have even contemplated that kind of a whack job conspiracy theory, and yet, here we are. So then we get into Tether. And I had speculated, I did an interview with the Daily Mail a while ago, And I've been asking myself, how did Howard Lutnick get involved in Tether? There are a couple of interesting things about Howard Lutnick, which is that you never heard about him in cryptocurrency, and you also never heard about him in Republican politics. So then just all of a sudden, he comes in and out of nowhere, he's doing a six hundred million dollar investment into Tether. in exchange for getting the exclusive contract to manage all the treasuries and

then all of a sudden not being politically active he's the chair of trump's transition team involved with the selection of all the cabinet members like that that's a little bit weird so i've always thought that bro i've i've not i've not assumed my suspicion is that brock pierce is the one that put all of this And I still don't have like the definitive email on this, but I think certainly some things make that look more probable now than when I was thinking about it a couple of weeks ago. And one is that Howard Lutnick claims that he cut ties with Epstein after two thousand and six.

OK, this is one of the things I think maybe even as he was going through his confirmation process for Commerce Secretary or so forth, he said, no, he was disgusted. You know, he did one of these. Oh, yeah, I distanced myself from this in two thousand six. Well, now we have emails that show he was planning a family trip to Epstein's Island in twenty twelve. We have that email. We also have an email where Epstein donated fifty thousand dollars to an event Lutnik hosted in twenty seventeen. Now, we also know that Lutnik was a next-door neighbor. He was a next-door neighbor of Epstein, and he actually bought his house from Epstein. So we originally had those pieces of information,

but it's conceivable somebody could purchase some real estate or whatever. It doesn't mean that they're involved in anything. It doesn't mean that there's any intersection in crypto and everything else, but he blatantly lied about this. And so here's the... here's the email from Howard Lutnick to presumably, well, to Epstein. By the way, the redactions on this are weird. They redact things where it's like, well, clearly you know who it's to. He's saying who it's to, but then you block out the name in the field. I actually saw somebody said something that was pretty interesting, which is they clearly redacted the word don't. And the takeaway they had from that was, why would you do that?

And then they said, oh, wait, Don. So maybe they just went through and redacted anything to try to cover up Trump's name, perhaps, in some of these documents. Or it's just incompetence. I mean, who knows? I don't even know what... I can only imagine what their process was for redacting three and a half million pages. But the... Let me... Let me see if I can expand. Font's a little small here on this email. All right. Hi, Jeff. We're landing in St. Thomas early Saturday afternoon and planning to head over to St. Bart's on Monday at some point.

Where are you located? What's the exact location for my captain? Does Sunday evening for dinner sound good? I have another couple, Michael and and uh marcy learman with me on my boat and each of us have four children and it goes on with their ages thanks howard so so i mean again Howard Lutnick flat out lied. I mean, so at a minimum, we know he lied about having a relationship. He lied about cutting off ties. He even received money from Epstein. And so I suspect there's more there. Again, this is what we have, but I'm trying to process through all of these documents and put all of the documents into kind of an email viewer, just like Gmail. But we're going to have actually more

information than Gmail so that we can see all of this. But we've demonstrated... that there's a relationship between Epstein and Lutnik. And we know that Pierce is essentially Epstein's crypto advisor. So I'm going to make the... My theory is that Pierce is directly involved in this. My theory is that I suspect that somehow, through some vehicle, possibly through Pierce, because that's what they did with Coinbase, I'm going to suggest to you that Epstein is an owner of some part in Tether. and that the whole connection with lutnik happened through brock pierce in fact it might have been that epstein introduced pierce to howard lutnik that's probably

more likely the case right think of it so pierce is advising just like pierce went to epstein trying to get larry summers it's very conceivable that Pierce went to Epstein to get access to Lutnik or Lutnik after having a conversation with Epstein was introduced to Pierce. Maybe, maybe not, but man, I'll tell you when you see the rest of it, it certainly makes a lot of sense. And so now here's the key part of this that I've, i want to express that i think is really important from a timing perspective epstein invests in blocks block stream in july of then the destruction of the

bitcoin foundation happens while pierce's is in charge and epstein ends up funding the bitcoin developers who solidify Bitcoin as being digital gold instead of digital cash. Now, if your new model that came out of nowhere, as I talked about in the interview with Jeffrey, Jeffrey's like, he's got people calling him all of a sudden. It's kind of like, no, we're not doing digital cash now. It's digital gold, right? New narrative, kind of out of the blue. There are like new talking points. It was clearly a contrived... This was not an organic process to kind of push this narrative. Well, if you are going to be a store of value,

then you need to have something that actually preserves value or goes up in value. So now we're in the This is where what we found was there's a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, They calculated that tether purchases accounted for roughly fifty percent of Bitcoin's entire price run up and up to sixty four percent for other top coins.

Less than one percent of the hours with big tether flows explained half the Bitcoin gains that year. So, I mean, They made the narrative, they hobbled the coin, and then they artificially pumped the price to make people believe that it was a store of value. This is what I'm suggesting is the narrative here. And so what I'm suggesting is that the whole... Bitcoin store value thing is fake. It's completely fake. And then it turned into kind of like a fake it until you make it. Now, remember, the important part about all of this is Tether has still not passed an audit. So at this point, when they're doing this,

these are likely coins that are not backed one-to-one. They were found in two instances, once with the CFTC. In twenty twenty one, the US, the US, the CFTC find Tether and Bitfinex a total of forty two point five million dollars. Forty one million for Tether, one and a half million for Bitfinex, which is an exchange, a Bitcoin exchange or a crypto exchange. And they actually have a common investor. iFinex is an investor in Tether and Bitfinex. I'd love to see who the shareholders are in that, by the way. They were fined forty two point five million for lying about reserves. The CFTC found that from June the sixteenth to February twenty nineteen, Tether falsely claimed that every USDT was

backed one to one by dollars. In reality, it was fully backed only twenty seven point six percent of the time over a twenty six month period. They also hid that reserves including included unsecured loans and other non-cash junk. Tether settled without admitting or denying, but the numbers are on record. So no one's disputing the fact that during this time period, when this pump happened, that they didn't have the reserves. And there are all these shady practices, including hiding reserves. And I've dug more into this. They would do things like... By the way, Tether's still doing this to this day. They still haven't passed an audit.

What they do is something called an attestation. So rather than... have a situation where they analyze all of your financial statements, all of your profit and loss balance sheet, all of the transactions and everything, and see exactly what happened over time, inflows, outflows, to make sure that everything is legit. It's kind of like taking a snapshot of your bank account, your check account in one day to see if you have enough funds. Well, there's another document that I read that suggests, or article that I read that suggests that this crypto exchange Bitfinex would wire money to Tether for the attestation. And like a day or two later, the money would get wired back out to Bitfinex.

So, I mean, you know, I had an interesting conversation with somebody today, an email, somebody who read the article. And so I want to be clear. Fiat is a Ponzi, right? They print that out of thin air backed by debt. This is essentially like a meta level of that. So you're claiming that your thing is backed by this thing that's a Ponzi. And then your thing isn't even backed by that. And that is what was used to pump the price of Bitcoin. They've parlayed this whole thing now into Lutnik backing the treasuries. And remember how kind of evil this is, right? So up until the Genius Act, if you had a stable coin, even if you were making the claims that you were backed one-to-one,

you didn't have to back your stable coin with dollars or treasuries. You could have used gold. or Bitcoin, or silver, or real estate, or whatever, right? But so long as the assets that you had backing your token were sufficient that somebody could redeem it for a dollar's worth of value. Ludnick came in and made an investment that said, well, we want to manage your treasuries, which, of course, the treasuries probably, for a company that... hasn't been able to do an audit and has been found to not have reserves. They probably didn't have a huge amount of treasuries. So he goes in and cuts that deal and then gets involved in politics. And then they bring in this guy, you know,

Bo Hines to be the crypto advisor for Trump to draft the genius act. And then the genius act, part of the genius act says, if you're going to be a legal, legitimate stable coin issuer, you now have to back the, your stablecoin only with treasuries. This makes Howard Lutnik the single biggest beneficiary in his firm, Cantor Fitzgerald, of the Genius Act. And lo and behold, here we are, it's February, and USAT, which is the official symbol for Tether's new official stablecoin, is now live. So he went from the investment to getting involved with the administration to getting somebody involved to craft the

policy to getting the law passed to the advisor that helped him passing it becoming the CEO of Tether America. And they've still never passed an audit. So I'm trying to express, I'll try to work my way through to get even simpler language on this, but are you sensing how big of a scam this is? Digital gold was a made up thing pumped with fake money. And then now this has turned into government regulation. And before the election, I'm not going to say who the people are. Now or yet, but I was talking to people that have the ear of Trump at a high level. And this is before the Genius Act. This is before I knew about Lutnik.

I was trying to warn people and I said this on the show even before the election. I thought Tether was kind of going to be potentially this too big to fail disaster because... because Tether wasn't just used to pump Bitcoin. Tether was used to pump a lot of other cryptos. And in fact, I think that if you look at, and I'm going to be careful, these are my opinions, but the centralized exchanges aren't regulated. But on top of that, you have, you know, Binance has a stable coin. There are all these other stable coins. How much of the overall volume of all crypto is fake? How many fake stable coins are there? And you may have situations where people are wash trading,

where they're printing fake stable coins, and then they're just trading the same coins back and forth to pump up the volume and to pump up the price artificially and to make it look like that there's more demand and more interest. I mean, I think it's conceivable that there's just huge taint there. across the board but the problem is that now tether is literally positioned itself to be too big to fail this is the thing that i worried about the most right because as i explained it to you this is so bad this is such a corrupt situation that no one will ever want to take responsibility for this because with tether i haven't even checked how many you know we're thirty three

trillion dollars a year now in stable coin volume and they're the largest player so on and so forth No one's going to want to admit that they allowed this to happen. They will cover this up before they allow it to happen. And as I have suggested, this new Fed chair that we have, Warsh, his role previously was to bail out the banks during two thousand and eight. So now we come full circle. bitcoin was created or at least we thought was created as an answer to the financial crisis as an answer to the bailout and now where we are is bitcoin was hijacked

from being the antidote to that to now being something that is a fake store of value while the same people involved have created something that's worse than fiat itself, a digital token that can be programmed, tracked, and censored that's backed by treasuries. So this is a hijacking of crypto. This isn't even just a hijacking of Bitcoin. This is much larger. And this will continue to get much larger. I don't have necessarily a lot of time to investigate all of these things. I'm focused on the main aspect of this. I'm trying to find out the most relevant parts as it relates to technocracy and as

it relates to losing our ownership of money and assets and our ability to engage in voluntary trade. So I'm going to continue to investigate the biggest issues around this. But I mean, honestly, I'd love to get your comments and feedback on this, but are you seeing how big of a scandal this is? I mean, I would frame this as, I don't know if I did this in this article or not. Yeah, I did. So I'll actually just read this because I thought it was a pretty good synopsis of this. So The end game, genius, clarity, and the Bitcoin Reserve. So this is the full circle. Epstein funded the MIT devs who killed Bitcoin as cash. Brock Pierce ran the Bitcoin Foundation into the ground,

opened the door for Epstein's money, brokered Epstein's Coinbase stake, sat in Epstein's mansion pitching Bitcoin to Larry Summers, co-founded Tether, and kept emailing Epstein until twenty eighteen. Tether then printed unbacked dollars to pump Bitcoin fifty percent in twenty seventeen. Howard Lutnik, who lied about cutting ties with Epstein, took over management of Tether's one hundred and thirty plus billion dollar Treasury reserves before he even joined the Trump transition team. He pushed for Treasury secretary, missed, landed at Commerce, installed his ally Beau Hines as White House crypto advisor, had Hines ram through the Genius Act, then watch Hines quit the White House and

immediately become the CEO of Tether's U.S. subsidiary. every single player is connected every single move is coordinated the genius act entrenches the exact loopholes tether has lived on the clarity act handles regulatory control over to the same insiders the bitcoin strategic reserve sits on top of a coin whose price was artificially inflated by the same stable coin they now regulate whose core development was funded by epstein and whose usability was deliberately destroyed by the people who profit from the fix This is not Big Short, two point oh, this is Big Short, two point oh, on steroids, preplanned and run by the same network that already owns the outcome. They created the crisis,

crippled on-chain Bitcoin, printed the fake money to pump it tether, positioned themselves to own the solution, Blockstream, Cantor, USAT, wrote the laws that protect their scam genius clarity and are now preparing to step in as the saviors when the bubble they inflated finally pops they walk away with fees stakes revolving door jobs and permanent control over programmable money we get every transaction tracked this is us every dollar programmable and the last remnants of financial freedom erased under the banner of innovation and stability this is not incompetence this is conquest I mean, this is what's going on. So when I talk about,

almost no one talks about tokenization. I've been writing articles, I've been talking about tokenization for seven or eight years. Because tokenization is the gateway to the complete digital prison. Because it's the tokenization of everything, not just money. This is why Zeno is important. This is why Zeno is critical. This is why privacy coins are critical. Because the only way out of this system, which is complete tracking, by the way, even today, they're still pushing. They delayed the Clarity Act. But once again, Cynthia Loomis is on there. She made some quote. She was talking to Besant in some hearing or whatever. And she said, well, we need this bill.

America needs this bill to move forward. If you don't want this bill, move to El Salvador. This was literally her speech. Just as a gut check here. You don't lead by having the most onerous legislation. Money flows to where it's the freest. So the idea that this is going to make that surveillance and excess regulation and cronyism is going to make the United States the crypto capital of the world is false on its very face. None of this even makes any sense. I don't even know why that propaganda would work. I don't even know if that propaganda is working. Because as I said, when I've analyzed...

The traffic, it seems like they're mostly bots. And I've even asked people, because I'm now finally starting to get traffic on my feed, I'm not finding very many actual people that aren't paid lobbyists, that aren't working directly for the companies, that are actually like, oh yeah, I'm really gung-ho about this. And that Paul Barron article, the comments in there, showed to me that was my first bit of proof that most people don't know anything about this, but those that are following it kind of have a gut check that says, yeah, this doesn't sound right. Real-time tracking of all of my transactions, giving my financial information to foreign central banks, this doesn't seem like...

this clarity is going to provide benefit or economic freedom to anyone in the world. So, anyway, this is where we are. And, you know, I discussed here, kill clarity, whatever, repeal the Genius Act, but... The reality is, politically, there is no solution, as I've stated over and over again. This is why we actually have to use alternatives. This is why the answer to using... The way I view it is, I view Zeno as kind of my version of digital gold. I invest in it because it's the cryptocurrency that is used. It's the infrastructure that's used to tokenize all of the other assets. And so every asset that is privately tokenized,

there are fees associated with that. Those fees involve Zeno. So people actually have to buy Zeno to do transactions. There's an actual inherent fundamental business model and reason for the price of Zeno to go up. But when you think about stablecoins, Freedom Dollar is the answer to USAT. It's the answer to USDC. It's the answer to these government-regulated stablecoins. It is a stablecoin that, yes, is pegged to the dollar, but it is not backed by US treasuries. It's backed by over-collateralized Zeno. So you're not helping... to expand the debt of the country by three trillion dollars, which is now the new number that Besant has. He thinks that the Genius Act will lead

to three trillion dollars worth of treasuries being purchased to back these stable coins. Freedom dollar doesn't do that. It's backed by over-collateralized. And you can't freeze it and you can't stop the transactions. This is why these things... are important so when i talk about these this is why i don't i don't talk about price i want people to understand we have to have the ability to engage in voluntary trade outside of the digital prison system and we need to be able to have a payment mechanism and we need to be able to trade and own our other assets this is why this technology is is important so anyway but that's i guess that took longer than i thought there's a little bit of

redundancy because i talked about a little bit too much at the beginning happy to uh i've not actually sent around any links so i don't know if anybody's even gonna have the ability to join here but i'll put the link in um if you want to join the live chat here's the link and i'm gonna send this around to some other people as well. And as I said, I have to get off a little bit early because I have another interview I have to do at nine and I need to get ready for this. And it looks like I have three more interviews tomorrow. So anyway, so I think this is big. I think that the proof here is indisputable. This is information that we've never had before.

And there's more. Like I said, I think it's probably going to take a month to get through these Epstein files or more. And it's not just me getting through it. It's me getting it to the site and obviously everybody crowdsourcing it, not just through Technocracy Atlas. But there's so much more there. There's so many other pieces. And I want to say on the conspiracy front, there's something... I did a podcast about Nasara and Jasara and the debt jubilee and this narrative that people are spinning about XRP and XLM being part of the reboot of the financial system. And they're going to, you know, tokenize gold and give everybody... They're going to eliminate everybody's

debt and like tokenize gold and give it to them on XRP and XLM. And I've got to tell you, I have a... I don't have direct evidence for this, but this has Steve Bannon all over it. And I say that Steve Bannon is all over advising Epstein. But the one thing that you can tell from the interactions back and forth, conversations, so on and so forth, his populism shtick is completely fake. I mean, like... They're like laughing their ass off about this. You know, I remember in twenty sixteen, Bannon would come to New Hampshire and he'd make this thing. You know, it was it was sounding like we're going to bring blue collar jobs back to America. And he's one of these guys that's out there.

He was really pushing the nationalism in China's bad thing. I mean, in behind the scenes, you look at his background, venture capital, private equity, investment banking, working with with Jeffrey Epstein. This thing is a complete construction. Steve Bannon was hired to make Epstein's image look good, to repair his image after all of this. You may have seen, there's a high def video going around. You know, I want to say there was something like maybe sixteen hours total of footage And it's all this fake narrative. And you read the back and forth between Bannon and Epstein about even the way that they're going about doing it. Well, we need to make sure that we downplay

the pedophilia and upsell and rehab your image as a philanthropist. So you are seeing the worst and most vile sausage being made. Um, so I, you know, there's so much to go through and, and if you, you know, once I get the technocracy Atlas thing, if you're interested in some of this, where I think this is going to be successful is, you know, people have different, different interests. Um, I, I know, uh, Courtney's interested in the digital bio convergence and that's a huge area for Epstein as well. The thing that we're finding about this is that he's literally in the middle of everything. So there's an email where he's emailing, I think it's Ehud Barak or Peter Thiel.

I can't even remember which one it was, but about the fact that they're going to be able to make a lot of money out of the situation in Ukraine. There is stuff there. And I know Mike Benz has talked about others. And I'm not going to spend time or even act like I know a lot of detail or information about that because there are other people picking other specific areas. And so if there's an area that you're interested in, you can truly become the expert on this because in mapping the relationships and mapping the timelines of what's going on here, I will tell you this, we are going to have a completely different view of how the entire world operates. And my hope is that when this happens,

people will finally understand why we're not voting our way out of this. This is like, we are, we're at like, we're beyond late Rome. And the fact that talking to people that were like, yeah, Watergate, people were demoralized about Watergate. We're struggling to get people agitated about the fact that we've got emails back and forth where they're talking about torturing and killing children. If there were ever a time where you would think that there would be pitchforks and people in the streets, you would think maybe... that murdering children and doing this with heads of state and so on and so forth and people kind of manipulating our monetary system and people

manipulating all aspects of media and the economy. Again, we're looking at this. Looks like Epstein was involved with the guy behind Forchan and Ghislaine Maxwell had a massive influence over Reddit, right? And remember the whole Maxwell empire. I mean, they're responsible for textbooks. They're responsible for quote, peer reviewed science. Like we're talking the systems that control everything. We're talking about emails between Epstein and Bill Gates talking about pandemics and, you know, kind of precursor to COVID stuff in twenty fifteen. So it's going to take all of us, you know, everyone in the world who has an interest

in this, being able to access this data and put this together. But what I'll tell you is people's understanding and view of the world should be completely changed by this. This should be just kind of a massive, massive transformation. And I am going to continue to do interviews, as many interviews as I can. I thought it was going to be mostly on clarity, but frankly, I actually think this interconnection of things, which I want to get more detail, I think that there's probably smoking gun stuff on Tether. And so I'm going to pull all that together. And at the end of it, it's going to be like, man, you know, if you... need a reason to not use Tether. I mean, so again,

I want to recap what Tether is. Tether is a digital programmable token that can be frozen that at best, at best, is backed by U.S. treasuries that fund government, U.S. government policy and tyranny around the world, where the biggest economic beneficiary is Howard Lutnick, Epstein's neighbor. And when you even look back, by the way, some of the files that come up about even his own hearings and money laundering and things like this. I mean, this is just... So when you use Tether, you're putting your energy behind that. Every time you use Tether, you're supporting everything that's going on. And by the way, look at what Tether is doing. We talked about this last week.

Tether is now buying gold. They're buying land. Talk about taking nothing and bluffing your way to the point where you're now getting basically the blessing of the state and then you're using that to convert and buy other assets. What a... What an absolute scam. So in any event, I know it's somewhat complicated, but man, hopefully we can get the word out. And I know I'm harsh sometimes with these Bitcoin maxis. And a lot of these people literally don't know any better. And so it's tough. So for me... My anger is with the people that were there in twenty twelve, twenty thirteen,

twenty fourteen, twenty fifteen that professed that they were libertarian and no better and are still they're the ones that are pushing the propaganda. They're the ones that are still pushing, have funds, you know, have fun staying poor. They're the ones pushing all of this stuff and kind of building this tribalism around meaningless phrases. that are disconnected from the underlying reality of what Bitcoin is, the people that constructed that, those people I'm upset with. The other people I'm actually somewhat, I mean, I have some compassion for, but at the same time, they have to wake up. And the most important thing is, Because we are at that point. What's going on right now?

You're seeing a dump on retail. When they say, when Paul Atkins, the head of the SEC, comes up and says, we're going to open up the twelve point five trillion dollar four oh one K market to cryptocurrency. What that means is they're dumping on retail. They're dumping on unsophisticated investors who are going to end up owning this junk through financial advisors. And they won't even necessarily know that they own it because they're going to try to push it into a four or one K or into some product where it's one asset, a bunch amongst a bunch of other things. And so somebody who's just working their job every day and their employer says, Hey, here are four,

three different funds that you can invest in or maybe you don't even get the choice here's the fund that you're in and boom now they own this stuff that's how the sec works the sec is there to make sure that the average person can invest in startups and and that the wealthy people that can invest in the early stages by the time they manufacture a narrative that it's safe they're dumping it on everyone else. And they're using these financial vehicles and these financial advisors to do it. In my opinion, the way that we stopped the Bitcoin scam isn't debating with Bitcoin maxis. It's going to the public. It's warning your friends and warning your family. I put out a tweet yesterday. By the way,

I'm grateful that these are popular. All I did was analyze the terms of service of the Bitcoin ETF. I did this, by the way, with the X terms of service. As we've talked about before, the whole reason I created own nothing is that what I learned writing some of these articles and researching this stuff is we already own nothing. We've signed all of these contracts. Well, some of the worst contracts are related to these financial products related to Bitcoin. The BlackRock ETF says they can increase the size from the supply above twenty one million. It says it can be confiscated. There's no real protection if somebody hacks and steals the ETF. It's garbage. Not only do you not have possession of

the asset, but you don't have any protection. And so, you know, so. I get angry about the propaganda of seeing an ad for Fidelity or an ad from BlackRock or some, frankly, some asshole on CNBC that's out there, you know, pitching how exciting this is. And how many times do we have to see, you know, I don't even watch CNBC. I don't even have a TV, but I see the clips on the feed. And it's like every day for the past four years, it's been somebody going on CNBC saying that two hundred twenty thousand dollars is the price target for Bitcoin. I mean, and so but the average person doesn't know better. The people that are getting fleeced are the people that are watching CNBC and

actually think that these people are providing objective advice, providing any analysis. I will say if I had the time, I would take all of the CNBC transcripts from the beginning of time and I would take every prediction anyone ever made and then I would map it to what actually happened. And you'd bury CNBC. But the battleground now is stopping the propaganda. Stopping the propaganda that Bitcoin maxis have been spewing. And they've suppressed the best people at communicating this information. So it's up to us. It's up to all of us. And so, yeah, I will be combative online and I'm going to continue every time the price drops. I was sitting around today. All right.

Every time it drops a thousand dollars, I'm going to put out a new tweet. So this new tweet, I'm going to I'm going to focus on kind of like this angle. You know, like I'm going to focus on the angle that, oh, did you know that based on the drop in price today? the cost to mine a Bitcoin is now twenty thousand dollars more than the price that it can be sold for on the open market. This is a big deal. If this trend continues, these mining operations spend tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. They have rent. They have mining equipment that they're paying leases on. They have employees. They can't afford a drop like this. They can't sustain this. And so then you know what happens?

They have to dump the Bitcoin that they have. This is a death spiral is what happens with this. Bitcoin mining is a stupid business now that there are no transaction fees. So one of the things about hobbling the block size is you've ruined the underlying economics of Bitcoin. The whole point of Bitcoin wasn't that people are just going to be gambling for these fees. I'm solving a math problem and then we're going to add almost no transactions. But as long as the price goes up forever, I'm going to be able to make a return on my hundred million dollars worth of equipment and electricity. That's essentially what Bitcoin mining has come to. It was supposed to be we're doing twenty

five thousand transactions per second. We are we are providing a decentralized network for people all over the world to be able to engage in trade at scale. We're going to make millions of dollars of fees because people are using it. That was taken away. That's what Epstein funded. So there are fundamental structural problems with Bitcoin. And Lightning Network doesn't fix it. Because Lightning Network moves, the thing that Blockstream created that Epstein invested in, has people doing these transactions on a second layer. There are no fees that go to the miner. They're all being done on the second layer. Blockstream and Epstein, they're collecting those fees.

They've destroyed the underlying model. And so, you know, Jeffrey is vindicated. Here, Jeffrey understood the beauty of the original economic model and understood that, well, gee, how are you going to do this? Now you've taken a system where there are no transactions. What are the economic incentives? How does the system work? It doesn't work. so in any event i've actually i've babbled on here and i have not been doing a good job sending these invitations if anyone wants to join join in or or you can actually just put questions in the in the chat as well but um you

know i'm gonna put this video out i'm gonna put my interview with jeffrey out and i you know one thing i'm also behind on is all these other interviews i need to put clips out because you know Not everybody or many people are going to listen to two, three hours of this or necessarily read all these articles. I want to get some of the clips out. But it's important for me to have... the comprehensive article. Because what I don't like is, you know, inevitably you put out a small clip and then somebody's like, oh, well, you know, you're an idiot. You didn't think of this. When in reality, it's like, all right, here's the forty page document. You don't even understand the context.

So it's kind of putting all of the pieces together that the deep research and the deep detail, but then also having the hooks and being able to put the information out to help people to look at it in different ways. There are a lot of people out there. I can tell from my comments These people have never read the white paper. They don't understand how it works. They're literally parroting these catchphrases. And I'm not mad at them. I'm frustrated at the people that pushed the propaganda that got it to this place. But our battleground is the general public. And I will say, when I talk to people that are, let's just say they're newly awakened but intelligent people,

their gut reaction is that Bitcoin is a scam. So the only way they would end up in Bitcoin is if they didn't know they were in Bitcoin because it was stuffed in there through a financial product. The only way others would end up with Bitcoin is if governments were using state-based reserves or at the state level or the national level. People inherently are not interested in this. So this is the thing that we have to stop. We have to stop the banking lobby and the crypto lobby, which is essentially Coinbase with Epstein's money, from passing legislation that will allow a politician to say, gee, aren't we patriotic?

We're the crypto capital of the world because we're gonna dump all of this on retail. One other thing, The Trump family got liquidated today, ten million dollars worth of Bitcoin because of their world liberty financial thing. I don't even know what the transaction was, but they had a margin call and they had to sell ten million dollars worth. There's a cascade of liquidations here. There's a whole bunch of stuff that will continue to happen. There are, I have to be careful because they keep sending cease and desist letters, but there are people claiming that Binance is in trouble and people are withdrawing their money from Binance. And if Binance goes down,

I would expect a twenty five percent drop immediately in the crypto market because Binance does huge volume, and there's a lot of interconnected stuff. When you dig into all of this, again, when you find out the kind of shenanigans and wash trading and things that are done with stable coins that are printed out of thin air and everything else, if that locks down, if that seizes up like it did with FTX, you have no idea what you're going to see across the board. And then people playing with leverage and everything else, the system is... Highly, highly volatile. So my advice, the advice I will give you is this. Do not leave any crypto on an exchange. I have been saying this for forever.

Exchanges are fundamentally not safe. I have a chapter on it in my book. The history of this going back to Mt. Gox, which by the way, one of the other emails is Brock Pierce talking about with Epstein trying to buy Mt. Gox. There's some correspondence back and forth about that. That was the largest cryptocurrency exchange at one point. That was hacked. You have FTX, you have Quadra, Quadra something or other. It was a Canadian exchange where... the founder quote died under mysterious circumstances, but that somehow he had all of the funds on his computer. Like just, so there's not a long standing history or track record here. And so all you have is risk.

You have risk across the board. You have risk of it being hacked. You have risk that they don't have the reserves. You have risks of government regulators. So usually when I say this, and so I can't tell you how many times I have said this and people didn't listen to me. And I feel bad when people that have listened to me, oh, I should have listened to you. Please listen to me now. Get your crypto off of the exchange. It's not safe. And it's particularly not safe in times of volatility. And more broadly, everything that I talk about when we talk about solutions, we're in an area of volatility. incredible volatility across the board and you want to have possession of as many

of your assets as you can. And when you go through this process with your investment funds and everything else, you realize you actually don't have a lot of ownership of these, of these assets. So take, take that out and do your own research. You know, obviously don't just accept what I have to say at face value, but read hijacking Bitcoin, read my article and dig in and do your own research and look at the Epstein files and, Yourself, you can go to the DOJ site and you can do some searches and then, you know, Technocracy Atlas will have better ways of getting access to all of this information. But look at the information yourself. Look at it directly. And if you're in Bitcoin, ask yourself,

why do you think it would recover? And an acceptable answer isn't just because there are all of these cycles, right? I posted this thing that said, one of the things that... It's not like it's a lot of data. Like, fifteen years worth of data is not a lot of data. But people try to extrapolate these trends and say, well, this is going to be this way forever. And usually, when there's a cycle, an up cycle, the general rule of thumb is that during the next cycle, the low is going to be the high from the previous cycle. You're never going to drop below that. Well, we blew through that today. The high of the last cycle was... um sixty nine thousand dollars at some

point today we dropped below we dropped to sixty one thousand something i haven't even looked at uh what the price is right now so so be very critical about this i mean i get you know i get a little tested but some guy today is like well you know i I have three sons and, you know, my son's future and generational wealth is in Bitcoin. And I'm like, you know, I don't even know what to do with that because this guy's watched twenty podcasts of twenty people saying the same thing. I did, you know, one of the listeners here. And if you're listening right now, I won't give you a shout out. I know you like your privacy, but he sent me like, hey, have you seen some of these podcasts?

Bitcoin Maxi podcast, and I watched the one that he sent me, and all they were talking about was Michael Saylor's company and whether it'll be added to the S&P. There's zero talk about people using Bitcoin or any aspect of it. It's people sitting there celebrating the fact that yet another third party that is borrowing money from the public to buy Bitcoin might be put on some other exchange, which means that because it's on that exchange, other investment vehicles will automatically buy it. And I, and I, you know, in, in a broad sense, people are sitting around whether you're it's gold or silver or, or whatever it is, there are a lot of people just sitting around saying, well, you know,

which asset? There's so much time with people sitting around saying, well, yeah, if I buy enough of this asset, well, if you buy enough of this asset, what, you're going to just sit on it and then the entire economy is going to improve? I've got news for you. We have to build things. The whole point of money is to be a medium of exchange so that people can engage in economic activity. When everybody's time is spent hoarding what they think might become the medium of exchange or store of value, nobody's creating anything. So there is no situation. What the Bitcoin maxis have done is they've constructed this concept of a citadel. I had somebody quote me on this today.

I may have been the same guy with three kids. I think this was somebody else. He's like, well, I'm all set. I'm going to be in a citadel in the clouds with my Bitcoin and my self-possession. What kind of world is this? How do you think that's going to work? That's how bad the propaganda is. And this has been pushed by the Bitcoin standard. There's a whole bunch of people, Max Keiser. There are people that have engineered this. And you know what? With what we've seen with Epstein and Steve Bannon and the way that they have manipulated a lot of the stuff, the way that they're really good at damage control, the way that they're good at positioning, the way that they're good at marketing. I mean,

if you can rehab a pedophile into a philanthropist, what do you think that they're doing to come up with diamond hands in the Citadel? How do you think they came up with QAnon? And I do get frustrated. The people that got ripped off from Nasara and Jasara, people that stopped paying their mortgages, and a lot of these look like they're elderly women that don't have hope. That seemed to be a big category for this. People are just like, well... well, this person said Nassar and Jazar, we're going to have a debt jubilee. And this is one of these things where it's like they predicted it a thousand times in a row and it didn't happen. And people are still sitting there

believing that this is going to happen. And it's tough. I mean, you know, look, I blame the Federal Reserve. We don't have sound money. We have a completely fraudulent financial system and that's put people into this position. But the only way out is to build. The only way out is to engage in voluntary trade and to get rid of this just massive collection of parasites that infect everything with multiple layers of regulation and intermediaries and all of this other stuff. it's got to go and it's infected Bitcoin. Bitcoin is not, you know, I got my transaction with the first time I got a transaction like, wow,

this is magical. Somebody sent me money. There was no bank. It was instant. And now it's I'm going to buy a Bitcoin treasury company that's going to store the Bitcoin at Coinbase. And I'm going to hope that it's put on the S&P list so that some other financial vehicle buys it so that the price goes up. That is not sound money. And that is not going to fix the economy. And that is not going to stop technocracy. So... Anyway, it is eight thirty. I am going to unless anybody's going to wants to jump on here. I think I might actually call it for now so I can freshen up before this

next interview. But I do encourage you to to to share this. I'd love to hear your comments on this. I think this is critically important. I think this is this is the biggest opportunity. we've had i know it's a little bit odd because i know a lot of people are suffering or pissed off or whatever but but look the truth is finally coming out and we have to seize the opportunity to get this information out there to as many people as possible to get this information out to our friends and family and to to stop this fake narrative that has been engineered to to you know enrich the same people that made money in two thousand and eight. And but the difference is this time

they'll get bailed out and we will literally get a complete digital prison with digital IDs, digital currencies and surveillance. This is exactly what's being put up. And every time people always speculate, what's the event going to be is going to be a false flag. How is this going to happen? Are they going to do it nicely or whatever? It's like, you know, this stuff is going on. We're getting emergency legislation. of the order of the Patriot Act and the Cares Act without an emergency and without any resistance. This has got to be the first time that I've seen that in this country happen, where you're getting massive surveillance added without a cause, without a generative cause,

but it's being masked. They're putting it in and saying that it's about crypto freedom and innovation. They're putting surveillance in and they're calling it innovation. This is not acceptable. And we have an opportunity now because the absolute truth is out and it's horrendous. And I said this at the beginning, but it's true. These Bitcoin maxis, and you know who you are, and I know who you are, and I know some of you. If you're going to continue to try to spin what's going on, if you're going to read these Epstein files and you're going to continue to try to spin this, your reputation will never come back.

All right, so with that said, I will... Let's see, which song are we playing? On the way out, I think I'll play Truth Cascade. This is tentatively, this is the working... I don't know, maybe we'll do another contest to see what should be the anthem. I was going to go... I was going to do a demonstration of Technocracy Atlas, but this stuff is too important. We'll get to that other stuff later. So I'm going to play Truth Cascade. This is the Technocracy Atlas theme song, tentatively. All right, have a good night. See you next Thursday at six p.m. Started with one photo, one connection, one name Ran it through Google Images,

reverse searching, no shame Found three more photos, found a flight log, found a date Cross-referenced with public records, now I'm up to weight Tagged it in the Discord, someone found the company The donations, the chain Now we got forty-seven people mapping the campaign One becomes, two becomes, ten becomes more Truth has an air rock effect we can't ignore Every connection reveals ten more doors This is the cascade, this is the score Truth's cascade, watch it, don't let no one investigation

We extracted the GPS from the location from the property records found the LLC from the becomes fifty becomes spread truth is exponential once it leaves your head every whistleblower empowers ten more instead this is the cascade this is the threat

They try to compartmentalize, separate the scandals Keep the connections hidden but we're digital vandals Taking down the walls between their separate lives Watching the cascade reveal the enterprise Truth cascade Watch it dial me, no one investigation

Cascade Cascade True Cascade Started with one photo Ended with five hundred connections That's the Cascade That's the power

I woke up to silence But the war had begun They froze my account Said I'd done something wrong Wasn't no crime Just living free Now the system Got a chain on me They took my savings My future,

my land With a single code line and a government hand Said it was safety Said it was green But all I see is tyranny behind the screen This ain't innovation It's a trap in disguise We watched all your lies. Genius ain't freedom. Gravity ain't clear.

It's a cage they built while we cheered. I believed it. But the same old swamp just changed its brand He banned the front door, opened the back Signed the bills that launched a fire

This ain't innovation It's a trap in disguise You'll own nothing Be watched all your life Genders ain't freedom It's a case they build while we cheat Your gold, your guns, your voice,

your name They'll digitize it all then shift the blame Palantirizing AI chains Freedom dying slow in patriotic flames This ain't about safety It's control in disguise With your ID, your face, your tears, your time They wrapped it in stars, sold it with pride Freedom's bleeding out from the inside

Death caught one and they call it peace But I still got breath, I still believe We can break the code, escape the scheme Turn this nightmare back into a dream