War on Technocracy UNLEASHED: Wake Up, Evolve, Build – The BIG Shift Revealed!

They've been feeding us these lies Since the day that we were born That we need them to protect us That we can't survive alone But baby, that's a fallacy Been blinded by their promises While freedom's been denied, oh Critical thinking broke these chains Opened up my eyes to see the game No

need for rulers telling me my worth I'm taking back the power that is mine This fallacious belief The truth has set me free at

last Government ain't nothing but a cycle Heading toward tyranny They militarize the police force While preaching about democracy But fuck that noise I see the truth now Their power's A voluntary system shows Another way is here, yeah Critical thinking broke these chains Opened

up my eyes to see the game No need for rulers telling me my worth I'm taking back the power that is mine by birth, yeah Belacious belief in their control Has been weighing down my goddamn soul But I'm free at last, free at last Breaking out of their system fast No, no taxation, stealing what's mine

free at last In a quiet world, technocracies rise Shadows

hide the truth from our eyes Digital chains, freedoms confined Silent whispers fill our minds Wake up from this technocratic dream Freedom calls, be on screen Rise above control, reclaim our lives Awaken now,

open your eyes

together we can win this fight break the chains reclaim your dreams awaken from technocracy schemes

Open your eyes. Technocracy fades, freedom will rise. Welcome back to The Aaron Day Show. This is season two, episode eighteen. Bear with me a second here. I'm loading up slides for today. There we go. So today's topic, and if you have any problems hearing me, I've got a new setup and I'm still trying to get everything kind of ironed out here.

So please let me know if there are any issues with the audio. In any event, today we are focusing on the war on technocracy unleashed. So as I said in the last couple of podcasts, I'm spending some time this summer really absorbing what's happened over the last couple of years and coming up with a new strategy to be more effective because I think we're in a much more dire situation than most people actually realize. Coming out of the election, people were very complacent about was going on with trump and everybody was excited about this idea that you know we had white knights that were going to come in and save the day and it turns out

that the exact opposite is true and what people feared was going to happen with klaus schwab and agenda and all of that is happening much more rapidly than anyone could have ever imagined and so I've been trying to warn people about this for two and a half almost three years now not only in terms of explaining what the threat is, but also trying to promote solutions. And so tonight I'm going to walk through what I've come up with at a high level. This is actually going to be done over a series of four podcasts. But today I'm just going to highlight a general overview and then we'll go into each of the three areas. that I want to focus on moving forward in subsequent podcasts.

And so before we get to that, I want to remind everybody that last week was actually episode seventeen. I had on special guest Matt Kim, and I really recommend that you check that episode out. He was talking about his new company It is a VPN that actually doesn't retain your logs at all. So it's an actual private VPN. Whereas a lot of people are unaware of the fact that other VPNs you use like Express or Proton or others, they may actually have logs. They may actually have information about your internet traffic. They just, as a matter of policy, don't share it with anyone. And so as a result, for instance,

if the government were to come in and subpoena them, or if somebody were to come in and hack them, that information very well may be there. And so this VPN actually has a new way of doing things, cryptographically actually separating the information so that not even the company vp.net has the the information so you can check that out uh I'm using it so you can go to bit.ly forward slash ard vp net if you want to check it out so I've been using it for a couple of weeks now and it seems to work on all of my devices tablet mobile and desktop so I encourage you to check it out it's really important that we focus on privacy. And even though I talk about privacy coins, you still need to have a VPN,

even if you're using a privacy coin. So VPNs are absolutely critical. Excuse me. I didn't have the podcast last week because I thought there might've been a chance that I was gonna have Mike Adams on, the Health Ranger, to discuss his new AI that he's just launched called Enoch. And I'm very excited about this. I think I've talked about this on previous podcasts. I've actually reached out to him and he has run a couple of searches for me even prior to the launch where I've struggled for instance when I was doing my fast. information out of any of I couldn't get any the AIs after a certain point. Once I got past day thirty

and I was looking for specific advice, I found no results anywhere, including Grok. So that was Grok three. So I actually sent him a message. I said, hey, what is your uh ai have even though it's still a bit in development and lo and behold it did actually have some results so I'm excited to have him on to discuss that and you may know I've been on his show decentralized tv a couple of times and when he hosted when he filled in one time for alex jones on the alex jones show He had me on and he also had Roger Ver and Tracy Thurman on. So very excited about that one. So stay tuned. It's not going to be live. I'm going to record it on, I believe, the twenty second and then

I'll play it on the normal Thursday. So whatever the closest Thursday is after that. And then just a reminder, I've actually started writing for the Agrist Cypher, which you can find at AgristCypher.com. This is a great newsletter. It's a subscription newsletter. I think it's like eleven dollars a month, but it has a lot of the leading thinkers and doers in. agorism contributing unique content every month sal the agorist john bush uh derek bros myself others uh so very excited about about this in fact is I was just reading the newest edition uh this morning and so this is all about practical tips so if you want to move beyond

just bitching about things or talking about the theoretical and you want to move into taking direct action, I encourage you to check that out. You can use discount code Aaron five and save five percent. I'm going to walk into a little bit of the update on what's going on with our political prisoners, our crypto prisoners of war who are still suffering from Biden era crypto lawfare. The first is, if you haven't heard already, Rogers hearing has been postponed yet again. So for context, his legal team, this is on a motion to dismiss his legal team originally requested January the sixth. for the original date for this hearing. And it's been moved several times.

It was supposed to be on the day after Porkfest, then it was moved to July the twenty eighth. And then we just heard a couple of days ago that it's moved again. So it's going to be sometime in October. We don't know the exact date. I don't know the exact date you want. If you want to get real time information on that, I'd follow Tracy Thurman. She's the one who who knows what's going on with that. So I don't know why this continues to go on. indefinitely I mean if you look at that october that's going to be the year and a half mark since he's been stuck in spain And so if you haven't already, please, you can either scan this QR code or if you're not watching this or not in a

position to do that, visit freerogernow.org and sign the open letter in support of Roger. Last time I checked, he was close to the one hundred thousand mark. And so. I think that, you know, we definitely want to get over that threshold. Let me look at it right now. It looks like he's about ninety seven thousand three hundred eighty four. So please, please pass that along and and let's get him over that threshold. Also, Ian Freeman. So I was at his appeal hearing. And that was. February the second of this year,

and he still hasn't heard anything. So here we are five months later, over five months later, and still no decision. We were expecting something back from the court within roughly two months. So please go to freeiannow.org and sign up to help support Ian and sign his petition. He also needs to get uh some numbers he was I think a little later to the process with uh with the sign up and everything but we want to get as many signatures as we can and again the signatures do matter they do help I I don't think ross would be free without the six hundred thousand signatures that uh lynn and everyone else were able to collect over a decade and so it it

very well may make the difference and part of the reason that it makes a difference is because you're trying to get politicians to do something. And if politicians see that there's a block of people that are interested in a particular topic, that there's a voting block and people that are really passionate about a topic, passionate about a cause, that will cause them to take action. This will elevate this. And so it's not a frivolous throwaway thing. It's a very important piece of activism and it takes less than a minute to do. Lastly, we have on the list Roman Storm. And I know that there are others, you know, I certainly and I'll talk about this later in the topic today in terms of my

priorities moving forward. I certainly don't know all of the all of the people that have been affected by crypto law. I've obviously prioritized people that I personally know who I know. were actually championing the cause of liberty, and that is explicitly why So in the case of Roger and Ian, they were targeted. I have absolutely no doubt about what's going on there. I've since had a chance to chat back and forth with Roman Storm and investigate his situation. He did his one and only interview this past week, so I encourage you to check that out. You can find it on X. So his story is like Roger's and like Ian's. and that you know he came to the united states uh started using computers

when he was five in russia and came to the united states with like five hundred dollars in his pocket and moved out to california and started doing any number of jobs a security job I think fast food a whole variety of things and was looking to pursue the american dream and so he'd always been a coder and so you know he ended up series of events ended up coming up with and working on Tornado Cache. describes it is Tornado And the way that he Cache was all about the fact that with Ethereum, essentially you can look at Ethereum as one big supercomputer and there are a whole bunch of apps on it. And since it's completely transparent, everybody can see. what apps everybody's downloading.

So Tornado Cache, the original idea behind this was to help protect people's privacy because there are some security risks and obvious privacy risks associated with everyone knowing what you've downloaded. So just like with Ian, just like with Roger, Roman consulted a lawyer. Then on top of that, he received venture capital money from a highly regarded venture capital firm out on the West Coast. And they had a lawyer come in and say, oh, yeah, you're fine. There are no issues here with money transmitter laws or any of these other things. So all three of these examples are a situation where you basically have smart people with really good intentions who tried to play by the rules.

And they've all been targeted for political reasons, and they're all suffering the consequences. And so I'm trying to be as patient as I can be with politicians, but these really are, in my opinion, the worst cases out there. Roman's trial starts next week on July the He's in the Southern District of New York. He's already spent millions of dollars in legal fees. He's raised, I think, another, you know, seven hundred fifty thousand. He needs more money. So if you can help Roman. please go to freeromanstorm.com and consider contributing to his campaign. He does need the support. Watch the video in the interview that he did. And I'm sure if you're

watching this podcast and you believe in freedom and you believe in entrepreneurship, you're going to get behind Roman. I'm going to walk through some of the events that are coming up. There's actually quite a bit. I didn't even have time to put The full update of everything, which you'll see as we get through this, this is part of the issue and part of why I'm dividing my activities into these three project areas. But I'm going to be speaking at the Peak Prosperity Annual Summit. I spoke there last year. I will be speaking on Sunday, I believe, which is the fourteenth. I will be speaking at and this is an update, I think, that wasn't available the last podcast.

I'm going to Ron Paul's ninetieth birthday barbecue. I'm actually going with Ernie Hancock, who's going to be sponsoring and doing a whole thing about, I don't know what the exact branding is going to be, but something along the lines of the revolution will be tokenized. And you'll remember he came up with the Levolution logo for the Ron Paul campaign. And so I've been on and with Ernie probably five times. And I talked to him and introduced him to Zato and he started using it. He, I think, is where I am, where if you actually think about what the Ron Paul revolution was all about, it was all about limiting government, ending wars, getting rid of the central bank. Obviously,

none of that's happened politically. I think we all certainly after the last if you hadn't already figured that out then maybe in the last week it's become pretty apparent that uh federal reserve's not going anywhere corruption's not going anywhere uh the military industrial complex certainly isn't going anywhere and so I think what he sees in Zeno is You know, what I see in Zeno, which is the opportunity to really empower voluntary exchange outside of the grip of the state. So I encourage you to check it out. You can buy tickets. Anybody can go. It's going to be outside Houston. So be a little bit hot. August the ninth at one p.m. So please consider checking that out.

brownstone polyface retreat also going to be at the this is uh joel salatin's farm so I'll be speaking there uh the first night that's a two-day event a lot of great great folks all the folks frankly are great from the brownstone institute so I'm looking forward to seeing seeing the other uh fellow fellows and scholars and jeffrey tucker and everybody from brownstone I think this is going to be a really terrific event. And the fact that it's actually on Joel Salatin's farm is going to be terrific because it's really in line with the ethos of the Brownstone Institute. I don't even know if there are tickets left for that. So if you want to check it out, brownstone.org.

Last time when I ran it at Joel Salatin at Freedom Fest, he said there were already over two hundred and twenty tickets or something. I don't even know what capacity the venue has, but that's going to be a great one. All right. So with all of the administrative stuff out of the way I want to talk about you know tonight really the focus is I'm trying to move things into three distinct project areas And I'll explain at a high level overview tonight why I think these project areas are important and why they're all necessary. Now, the other thing that you're going to see as we go through this is this is a ridiculous amount of work and there's a lot going on.

And I have I will say I have been taxed. over the last well I mean the whole two and a half years but really the last year in particular there's just been a lot to do and in part it's because of the urgency of the situation I mean the urgency of the situation I got into this whole situation to warn people about cbdc's to warn people about biden's And then all of a sudden, you know, my friends and people that introduced me to crypto and people that I look up to who are leaders in the liberty and crypto space were being targeted and arrested and thrown in prison by the federal government. And so then we had this election and. People were.

excited because they thought there was a new sheriff in town or whatever analogy you want to use a new white knight in town trump elon musk rfk all of it and and what people haven't been paying attention to is what's going on behind the scenes, which is what people were worried about a year ago with Klaus Schwab and the WEF and the UN is now happening on steroids. And the difference is it's being cheered on. And in part, it's because people aren't aware of what's actually going on. They're buying the marketing hype and they're not reading any of the fine print. And so what I've found, because as you see all the different areas that I'm working on,

you might be like, well, why not just focus on one area? And I'd love to focus on one area, except that you have to do all three of these things if we're going to be successful. Like we're in the bottom of the ninth inning and we're getting our asses handed to us. And the problem is that when I go to conferences, even when I go to crypto conferences, people are like excited about what's going on. I mean, people are actually sitting around saying, oh, yeah, we're going to we have crypto adoption now. Bitcoin strategic reserve. They're going to, you know, stable coins are a big indicator for crypto adoption. And that's the exact opposite of what is actually going on.

So I've had a very difficult time getting this message through. I mean, I have gotten it through to some degree. And if you're listening to this, I mean, you're probably aware of this or you maybe have heard me say some a lot of the stuff you're going to hear tonight. You've heard me say before, but it doesn't change the fact that most people still haven't heard of it. Most people do not understand technocracy. at all. They confuse it with technology. Even libertarians do this. I would say even the overwhelming majority of libertarians confuse these things. Oh, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, they're successful business guys. This is great. They're going to make things more efficient.

That's not what's going on here. So the theme of what I'm trying to do here is really around three things. Educating people on the technocracy takeover that it's going on in real time now. It's not a future event. It's actually almost over. And so the first goal is to help people wake up to that fact. The second is what I call an autonomy reboot. So we're all programmed. And I have talked about this in other podcasts. I mean, everybody's been programmed by a whole variety of external factors. Most people are not even aware of the fact that. that they were programmed, let alone doing anything actively to address that. So helping people evolve and unplug from the matrix and

essentially take back their free will, this is critical to all of this. In some way, none of the rest of this matters if people aren't reclaiming their free will. And truly, this is important because technocracy is the opposite of free will. Technocracy is scientists and engineers making decisions for you. You don't actually get to exercise your free will at all in any area where you live, where you work. the pronouns that you use uh access and ownership of private property the ability to interact freely with people so technocracy is the antithesis of free will however people are already slipping away and giving away their free will and they're giving their way their free will to

technology into a whole variety of other things so if we're not helping to empower people We're going to struggle. So I call that evolve. And the last program area is the revolution will be tokenized, which I talk about a lot. But I realized in talking about it, the Free State Project has released my talk from Porkfest. It was on the main stage. And I talked to a lot of people after this. People do not understand tokenization. And I'm writing a book about it. And that's only part of what I'm doing, because writing a book is not going to solve, solve the issue. Everything is going to be tokenized every asset, whether it's a physical asset, information, no matter how big,

no matter how small will be tokenized. That is just a matter of fact. That is, you know, it's in some ways, it's an upgrade to the technology that we use today, which are centralized databases, which can be hacked and have all kinds of other issues. but everything will be tokenized. The only question is now, is it gonna be tokenized in a way that promotes free will and privacy? Is it gonna be tokenized in a way that promotes technocracy. That's really the decision. This ultimately comes down to a battle of technocracy versus freedom and actually tokenization, believe it or not, is the battleground. That's why this is that important. This is why I'm so passionate about Zeno. This isn't a, hey,

let's pump this cryptocurrency. If you've known me for any period of time, I've been working on tokenization as a way to get rid of corrupt third parties and governments since two thousand eighteen, two thousand nineteen when I exited politics. Well, for the first time. And so so all of these. So I call that Bill. So it's all of these things. People have to wake up and understand there's a looming threat that's immediate. we have to take control of our own free will. We need to do that today. And then we need to take that free will and we need to build private decentralized systems. And so that's the high level overview of what all this is about. I have some video clips here

today and you've maybe seen some of these. A lot of these are new, but this one, first one isn't, but I'm gonna play it again anyway. And I want to give Derek Brose credit for this. Derek Brose from The Conscious Resistance. This is a segment from a video that he put together on technocracy. I think it's probably the best short clip and short explanation out there. So let me play that back and I'll be back in a couple minutes. As a technocrat, let's dive in. In the early twentieth century, a movement began to develop around a political theory known as technocracy, a system wherein management of governments is handled by technical experts, often involving technology-focused solutions.

Early proponents of technocracy claimed that the concept would lead to better management of resources and the protection of the planet. However, this system of governance by technological experts and their technology would also involve a loss of privacy, as well as centralization of power and the management of all human behavior. Although the term appears to have been largely forgotten, the technocratic philosophy and influence can be seen everywhere in our modern digital world. Already beginning to arrive at the huge civic auditorium where a large receptive audience turned out to hear Howard Scott as

he warned of an impending crisis in America's domestic and foreign affairs. One of the most influential proponents of technocracy was a man named Howard Scott, a writer who founded the Technical Alliance in New York City in nineteen nineteen. Scott believed that business owners lacked the necessary skills and data to reform their industry and thus control should be handed over to engineers. The technocrats publicized their vision of a centrally planned world via books, speeches, clubs, and political parties. This resulted in a brief period of popularity in the US and Canada and the years following the Great Depression. economists searched for a As politicians and

solution to the financial calamity, the technocrats imagined a world where politicians and business owners were replaced with scientists, engineers, and other technical experts who would manage the economy. However, in the nineteen forties, mainstream interest in the technocracy movement seemed to dissipate. The ideas that underpin the technocratic vision received the notable endorsement in nineteen seventy when political scientist Zbigniew Brzezinski released his book, Between Two Ages, America's Role in the Technotronic Era. Brzezinski will be familiar to long term researchers of the ruling elite. Until his death in twenty eighteen, Brzezinski was a diplomat who ran in the same circles

as David Rockefeller and former Secretary of State and accused war criminal Henry Kissinger. Brzezinski served as advisor to several presidents, from Jimmy Carter to Barack Obama. He was also a member of the Atlantic Council, the National Endowment for Democracy, and the Council on Foreign Relations. Although Brzezinski's book Between Two Ages substituted the term technotronic for technocratic, the depiction of the future is the same, a world in which the scientific and technological elite centrally plan the lives of all humanity. Essentially, Brzezinski's vision is a technologically advanced authoritarian-style collectivism wherein individual liberties are subordinated to the

apparent needs of the collective. When we examine the world of twenty twenty-five, we clearly see the signs of technocratic influence. For example, we can see this influence in the wealthiest companies and the most influential CEOs. These individuals are running companies that have amassed large amounts of financial wealth as well as unfathomable amounts of digital data on all of their customers. From Jeff Bezos at Amazon, Bill Gates of Microsoft, Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook, Elon Musk of Tesla and SpaceX, we can see the technocratic ideology. These men and their colleagues in various technological industries wield immense power through their companies, wealth, and cultural influence.

These individuals have enough money, resources, and connections to shape elections, geoengineer the climate, and cause dips in the stock market, to name a few examples. They are the technocratic class of So I think that video is an incredibly important overview because again, it's not about technology. It is a complete ideology that has been under development for ninety years and there really are people that are working on pushing a long-term agenda that spans decades and they have been patient and they have been

working through organizations like the Trilateral Commission and the United Nations and the WEF. And so this isn't a theory at this point. I mean, these, in fact, they don't even hide it. So it needs to be understood that technocracy is a movement and the more you understand about it, you actually believe in free will if you believe at all in your ability to make decisions in your own life you should be horrified by technocracy and you should be horrified by what's going on politically as well as technologically and so I've said this before and I'll say it again technocracy we are not in a situation there is no red versus blue this is not republican versus democrat this is not

the united states versus china or the united states versus russia none of that matters this is about a push for global technocracy the only thing that's being battled over unless we become awake, unless we wake up to what's going on. The only battle is who's going to control the technocracy. And I'll give you an example of this. So I've spoken about this as well. JD Vance was handpicked by Peter Thiel. JD Vance used to actually work for Peter Thiel. Then he formed his own investment company. Peter Thiel was an investor. Then Peter Thiel was the largest investor in JD Vance's US Senate campaign. And then Peter Thiel is the one who actually introduced

JD Vance to Donald Trump. Both of them share a common connection in that they both are big proponents of the ideology pushed by Curtis Yarvin. And I'll talk about him in a bit, but they are both explicitly supporters of technocracy so now what have we had happen in the last week well we'll get to this I'll get to america's party and all of that in a second but uh before I do I want to play a couple of clips that also kind of build on this idea of technocracy and if you haven't there's a great movie called the the agenda provision and it's by oracle films oracle uk I believe if you want to find them on x or on youtube terrific video I actually I don't know why I

hadn't heard of it before I actually just saw it over the weekend but has catherine austin fitz and alex newman and a whole bunch of other great people in it and it talks about a lot of these different concepts so I have a few short clips uh in tonight's presentation from from that so let me play one of those now The bigger picture is that an attempt is underway now to collapse liberal democracy and replace it with global technocracy. What I call an omni-war is now underway, which is to say that the transnational ruling class is literally, it's not a metaphor, is literally at war with

the rest of humanity and has weaponized everything that it can. And that's not an understatement, the more that you dig into this. I've written an article on this, but I wanted to expand it out. And I'm going to expand it out, actually, in probably more detail than most people are going to want to read. But the reason that I think it's important is to this idea that it's not red versus blue or country versus country. It's about two different sides that are just different sides of people pushing technocracy. You have Yuval Harari, who's pictured here on the left, and Curtis Yarvin. And these are the people that are providing what I'll call the pseudo intellectual ammunition for

the political leaders to push technocracy. Yuval Harari is coming at it from the left and Curtis Yarvin is coming at it from the right. And you can read a lot. And again, when I do the article, I'll do a whole talk on just this topic of Yuval Harari versus Curtis Yarvin. But let me give you one. quote that you might find a bit alarming. A sclerotic democracy should be replaced by a strict hierarchy headed by a single person whose role is a hat of monarch or CEO. Actually, I can't see the things in the way there. But in essence, he's pushing for kind of a neo-monarchy. And there are a lot of people that are excited and influenced by this idea.

Now, I will say, I understand a lot of the arguments are against democracy, which we're supposed to be a constitutional republic. We're not. I don't even know how you would label what the US government is currently. But the issue with this is that the models that are being pushed with technocracy, and ultimately, when you read about Yarvin Yarvin's pushing technocracy, is that it's without consent so in other words you know if there were network states that were formed and somebody wanted to create people were voluntarily their own new thing and signing up for it then fine I mean I think we should be able to have all kinds of experimentation going on with network states and

different governance models the problem is that what these technocrats are doing is they're explicitly hijacking and taking over existing political systems and existing resources that's the fundamental issue with this And as I mentioned, all three of these guys are heavily influenced by Curtis Yarvin. Musk, J.D. Vance, and Peter Thiel. To the point where it just came out this week that Elon Musk consulted Curtis Yarvin on his third party. So he actually... consulted with him before forming and announcing this America's Party, which isn't surprising to me. I've been trying to express this for months that this is about technocracy. And then when you actually

read what America's Party is about, the first two items in their agenda, one is about using AI for the military and the other is about using AI to make government more efficient. I mean, this is the hallmark of technocracy and so again there's no like I'm not connecting dots these aren't conspiracy theories they're not even hiding this the thing is what's going on with curtis yard right now is he's becoming a little bit of a cult hero particularly within the left brain libertarian movement and a lot of his stuff is being used to uh you know foment a lot of you know positions on racism. I think a lot of the stuff that you're seeing about when people are putting out statistics about race and

crime and everything else, a lot of this is put out in the design of it is to get people primed for this idea that we should have a philosopher king, that we should basically be moving to these types of neo-monarchical models that Yarvin is pushing. I think it's important that this gets exposed because I think people are not talking about the root of what's going on. So many people, again, are excited because they actually naively think that we're just taking these successful business leaders and we're going to take their talent and apply it to government. The truth of the matter is that because of decentralization and because of technology, we don't need government so

what technocracy is all about at the end of the day is centralization well you can take these very same technologies I'm not I'm not a against ai I'm not against technology I've I was five I had the first been using computers since tesla model s in in new hampshire I'm not against technology I'm not even against elon musk what I'm against is When he gets into government and now it's about using the technology to centralize government further for the purpose of pushing a particular political ideology that I think is anti-free will, that is why I have a problem with this. Yuval Noah Harari basically gets to the same place. He ends up getting to technocracy as well. His quotes don't come off as

polished as Yarvin. Yarvin kind of fits into this of jordan peterson camp of well yeah you have natural hierarchies and the natural hierarchies are based on competence which which makes sense to to a certain degree again the issue behind it all to me comes down anyway to consent and that's not what what is happening here it's not a competence hierarchy based on consent and even if you said well people are voting for it, we could go on a whole different conversation about the degree to which manipulation is even happening with voters and even what X is all about. I've been trying to find this clip, and I will find it at some point. I remember watching it a few years ago where Musk was

talking about the fact that essentially social media companies are manipulating people's limbic systems. and manipulating their emotions and manipulating their dopamine and you know he kind of laid it out from first principles this is before he got into social media but I think the point is that he does know exactly how it works from first principles and how you can shape and shift what's going on this whole thing a couple days ago with grok three all of a sudden going rogue and people complaining that It's, you know, it's all of a sudden become anti-Semitic and Mecca Hitler and all of these other things. I guarantee you this was by design. He is trying to elicit a response.

He's trying to gain support from some of the factions on X. He's trying to build a coalition for his political party. And he knows that by tweaking the AI, by tweaking the algorithms, he can do that. more so than could ever even be done with mainstream media. this idea that he bought X for free Again, speech, the idea that X is free speech, the idea that he always said it was about a WeChat style system, which is what China uses as the basis of their social credit system, and he's fully aware of how you can manipulate the algorithms. So it's really important to understand how fast all of this is happening. And I'm gonna play a quick digital ID clip,

and then I'm gonna talk about where we are with, again, the things that people were concerned about when it was the WEF, they're now already here in the United States. So I'll start with this small clip. With the rise of brain computer interfaces and biometric sensors and so forth, all the bodies, all the brains would be connected together to a network and you won't be able to survive if you are disconnected from the net. All life on Earth is going to be radically changed. It's a fusion of the physical, the digital, and the biological world. It's changing who we are. These people have gotten to the point now where they are openly anti-human.

Everything will be monitored. The environmental consequences of every human action. That cannot happen without digital ID. Once the digital ID is in place, it's game over for humanity. so once the digital ID is in place, All right, it's game over for humanity. I know a lot of people talk about that. Catherine Austin Fitz talks about that, the complete digital grid. Well, I've got news for you. We're already well on the way to having a digital ID. And the interesting thing is it starts with real ID. which was a program started under George W. Bush in two thousand and five is a response to nine eleven. And it actually took twenty years to get implemented. And I know I've avoided it by just,

you could have signed up for it you know, for a number of years now, but I always opted out and I knew they would keep on pushing the goalposts. And then all of a sudden Trump is elected and they pass it. And there's no outrage about it because they're using kind of voter ID and immigration as the way to do it, thing that they were going to do. which was such an obvious But the fact that people are falling for it is pretty uh pretty terrifying actually because when I say it's a digital id when you look at what is involved the data that's collected I mean your digital id is attached to your birth certificate it's security number it's attached to your social attached to a whole bunch

of other information and in the number of states as you can see on this map eight states it's already it's already digital and then there are kind of different layers of uh whether the state has pledged support or whether it's already integrated with an Apple wallet or a Google wallet. And so this is actually already accelerating. So it is already digital in eight states and growing. So we already have a digital ID. And Trump announced that there's going to be this database of Americans that Palantir is going to put together. One of the things that Doge did was they put an API in place with Palantir to connect Palantir to American taxpayers' tax information.

So now this is a new set of information. So now they're going to basically connect all of the databases of the federal government and information so that it's centralize all that available and can be attached to your real ID. So again, if Harris had been elected or if Biden was president still, they would have been too incompetent to pull this off. They certainly had the intent to do it, but they didn't have the technical ability to do it. And so either way, if you look at it, the technocrats are winning. And going back to this whole situation with the election, so look at what's going on now with America's party. So J.D. Vance is the likely frontrunner for the

Republican nomination for the presidency. And now you have Elon Musk, fellow Curtis Yarvin fan and technocrat, running another party so it looks like you're going to have two different ways of getting a technocrat in as president I would actually argue you could make the case that this whole thing was was kind of set up from from the beginning I mean if you look at elon's you know premise even you know with his dark maga hat that's actually a tip off to curtis yarvin as well I think it's conceivable this entire situation was kind of orchestrated but in any event the technocrats have uh almost certain control politically now, and then even more control as we move into the election.

And if you see, again, what Elon is saying, well, of course the Epstein thing is a reason for everybody to be outraged. They should be outraged. But all of that is gonna be used as a pretext to install more AI surveillance and more controls. and more Palantir and to spend more money on these things. In fact, that's already happening. And so we've got the digital ID. And to that point, this one big, beautiful bill, whatever that passed, a lot of people don't realize that what's embedded within that is essentially the Patriot Act two point. there's one hundred and fifty billion Oh, dollars in spending that is essentially going to the militarization of the police and to added AI and

added surveillance. One hundred and fifty billion. There's more going to this AI surveillance component than under the Patriot Act itself. And people aren't even talking about this. Because they're saying it's Why? all about immigration. But if you understand the history of how all of this works, what they're doing is they're buying technology, they're investing in technology, and then that technology is going to be weaponized. against Americans. That is inevitably what's happened. I mean, that is historically what's happened. we can't be naive enough to believe, oh, I mean, they're going to have drones and all yes, of this surveillance at the border and everything else,

but somehow it's not going to make its way into airports and into our local communities. I mean, it always happens. I remember being at hearings here in New Hampshire for having a Bearcat armored vehicle. And we were on the losing side of that. Why do we need a Bearcat armored vehicle in the state of New Hampshire? And of course, ironically, they ended up using the Bearcat when they broke into Ian Freeman's house, which also absurd. But there's no doubt about what's going on here. And Palantir is going to be a huge beneficiary of this one big, beautiful bill. So again, think about if Harris had been elected, where would we be sure she'd have rhetoric she would be talking about wanting to do

all of these things but it's kind of like obama and the obamacare website and everything else um they'd be fumbling around for a long time I mean I don't even think in two terms Harris could get to where the technocrats have been able to get by leveraging their relationship with Trump. So this is why I have such a sense of urgency on all of this and about talking about this technocracy, because even when you look at the battles now, I mean, I don't even know how to look at the exchange on X anymore. If you're at the point right now where you've already got the course of people coming out and trying to defend the fact that the case was dropped against Epstein. And now Prince Andrew,

today it was announced, now he can travel freely internationally because of the DOJ dropping the case. How can anybody think that this is okay? There's no five D chess here. There's something profoundly wrong about this. We know that there are numbers of victims. They've come forward. I mean, people have seen their testimony. James O'Keefe was able to actually get some footage of somebody talking about Prince Andrew. I mean, there's no denying this, that this is something that happened at a massive scale. Bondi said she had, you know, whatever, ten thousand hours of tapes, whatever it was. And then all of a sudden on a Sunday. They announced they're dropping the case. It's absurd.

So in any event, it's pretty bad. I mean, look, the case wasn't even dropped under Biden, right? I mean, this is to a certain degree, this is a whole new level of twisting yourself in knots mentally, mental gymnastics to actually rationalize what's going on here. So I'll play another clip here about AI surveillance from the movie, The Agenda. That control is now entirely achievable because the would-be controllers finally have the tools to execute it. Total surveillance, artificial intelligence, digital IDs and central bank digital currencies. The potential for social control is gigantic and

potentially irreversible. So... Again, AI surveillance, this is happening at a rate that was unimaginable. And if you've looked into Palantir, I'm sure I'll do a whole separate episode at some point. I don't know why my camera, hold on. All right, there we go. I'll do a whole separate episode on Palantir because if you look into the history of this organization, I mean, it's kind of outright demonic in terms of what they've been doing. not just in the united states but internationally their involvement um being against right-wing governments overseas their

their role in palestine their role in uh predictive modeling and predictive techniques essentially minority report style pre-crime with local law enforcement here in the united states this is not a company that you can look at and say these guys are the white knights and we're seeing a a parallel thing here, which is somehow the military industrial complex is bad when it's Raytheon, but somehow it's great now that it's Palantir. And the answer is it's not good under either scenario, but arguably it's much, much, much worse. the same as what's going on in actually healthcare with with rfk which is you know replacing big pharma with silicon valley companies and wearables is not the

big flex everybody thinks it is in fact it's very much uh two sides of the same coin silicon valley uh is actually at the center of of both of these things and of course naturally they're at the center of technocracy so there's stuff going on here that is just that doesn't make sense again if if you understand the threat of technocracy. I will play, let me see, I have one more clip here, short clip from the Agenda movie. CPTC can allow government agencies and private sector players to program, to create smart contracts, to allow targeted policy functions,

for example, welfare payment, for example, consumption coupon, For example, food stamps. By programming CBDC, those money can be precisely targeted for what kind of people can own and what kind of use this money can be utilized. A key difference with the CBDC is the central bank will have absolute control on the rules and regulations and also we will have the technology to enforce that. so and you know again this is what I've been talking about for a couple of years

with relationship to cvdc's and now people are saying well we don't have to worry about that anymore because trump's against cvdc's I'm not going to rehash all of it but in many respects you can go back to season two episode fourteen and episode fifteen where I go into quite some detail about what's going on with with stable coins and I'll recap the most important aspects of this because again They've been working on a CBDC for a long time. I mean, the US government's been working on a CBDC since twenty eighteen, three different projects out of MIT. So this isn't something that's just at the concept phase. This is something that they've had actively engineers. They've actually had

programmers that worked on Bitcoin working on this. And so this isn't something that's on the drawing board. This is something that they've actually actively tested. But even still, this Genius and Stable Act is actually going to hyper accelerate what would be possible if they just tried to implement a CVDC directly. And the most important thing to understand about it is why they're doing it and the main reason that they're doing it. There are a lot of reasons that they wanna do it, but the number one reason they have to do it is, This administration and the government has shown no ability to reduce spending at all, obviously, which came up with the one big, beautiful bill.

And the truth is people don't want to buy our debt anymore. China doesn't want to buy our debt. Our debt's been downgraded. So what are we going to do? They are actually in a very difficult situation, which is they need to fund the government. So they decided to capitalize on the hype of stable coins. and use legislation to take something that has been popular privately and put it under the control and surveillance of the United States Congress and the Federal Reserve. I mean, it is genius in that sense, but in kind of an evil way. So at the end of the day, you have people out there saying, hey, this is about crypto adoption and it's not about crypto adoption. You are getting surveillance

fiat tokens and those surveillance fiat tokens are being used to raise debt so that the government can expand the war machine and expand its corrupt activities all over the world. So it's the opposite of crypto. The purpose of crypto was to separate money and state and to enable people to engage in transactions without third parties. There couldn't be anything further from that idea than stable coins being captured through the Genius and Stable Act. And Trump talked about this, but when you see what the administration says about this, they're explicit. Again, there are no theories about this. Our crypto AI czar will foster stablecoins, but only under strict rules.

So this is know your customer rules, all the bank secrecy act stuff, all of the financial surveillance that you get from the existing banking institutions is going to apply ultimately to stablecoins as well. And the Treasury Secretary, stablecoins could create two trillion of demand for US Treasuries. We're going big on digital assets again because they have to, because they have been completely unable to rein in spending. Based on what I heard, at least from Thomas Massey, we're going to be adding two and a half trillion dollars a year to the debt for the next two years. You know, we're in a situation right now where Trump added whatever it was, seven point eight trillion his first term.

It looks like he's going to beat his his old record. and and no one wants to fund this so the hype of treasury of excuse me of stable coins is how to do that and so the legislation will ban algorithmic stable coins it'll force financial surveillance and again it will be used both the stable and genius acts to sell treasuries and fund more government tyranny and they are really popular There were twenty seven trillion. This was a little bit outdated. The actual total figures for last year, twenty seven trillion dollars worth of stablecoin transactions growing to one hundred and twenty trillion. which is more than Visa and by twenty thirty, MasterCard and direct deposit combined.

So that's how popular this is. You would never see that kind of adoption from a CBDC issue directly. In fact, there hasn't been I mean, there have been eleven CBDC projects launched. China was the first. And while they've launched the CBDC, it hasn't had great adoption yet. They're kind of slowly muddling their way through it. And so this is a situation where Now the U.S. is going to own digital surveillance money and they're going to use it to cement our position. And, you know, do we think we're the moral force of righteousness and good in the world with our policies? I mean, I'm guessing that, you know, if you're actually looking at what's going on in the world, probably not.

In fact, at this point, we may be the bad guys. And so this is going to be used to continue to fund that. And so lastly, this is another clip that kind of speaks to the technocracy and what's motivating it. This is the last clip from the Agenda movie. Let me see here. It seems to me that there's a very strong drift in the direction of globalization, of the ultimate centralization of control in the hands of unelected officials at supernational organizations. The lust to control other human beings is a story as old as time.

They want all of the resources of the world in their pocket. They do not want you and me to have anything. It's in writing all over the World Economic Forum's website. By twenty thirty, you will own nothing and be happy. That's an oxymoron. If you don't have anything in your name, you ain't going to be happy about it. So that is essentially what's going on here. So to recap where we are on this, this technocracy takeover, my plan, and again, I'll do a whole episode just on this first of the three pillars, but is going to be to write more articles uh on this topic and go into

more detail as I said the the yarvan and harare stuff but but you know more aspects of it as well I think that part of it has not been discussed and again that might not be really popular it's not necessarily going to be a mainstream thing but it's important that it's documented and that people understand the ideology of what's motivating this or at least if not the ideology of what's motivating it the pseudo-intellectual material that's being used to justify it that's probably a more accurate thing like I don't necessarily think that curtis yarvin influenced peter thiel or Musk, they were already technocrats. Musk has already been a technocrat. I think they're just using

his information and they're using his popularity amongst a particular segment to push their ideology further and to get really fanatical supporters in the process. Because the people that like Curtis Yarvin really like Curtis Yarvin. So this is a way to really build some momentum so I'm going to do articles on that I'm going to continue to do podcasts I'm actually going to elevate the aaron day show pretty significantly because I'm going to be doing additional content in all three of these areas on all three pillars you know as I said that mike adams coming up I'm going to start bringing in more guests I may expand it to two days a week probably not much more beyond that

because it actually takes me quite a bit of time to put this together. Hopefully at some point I can get my wife on board full time to do this if it continues to grow and scale. I'm also doing a lot of other podcasts. I've been on the Shannon Joy Show. I'm gonna be on with Chris Martinson a couple of times next week. and a lot of other overlapping podcasts related to technocracy. I've been on with Derek Brose. I'm going to invite Derek Brose to come on and talk about this as well. Patrick Wood. I mean, I encourage you to follow all of their work, particularly, you know, Patrick Wood and Courtney Turner and Derek Brose. These folks have been at this for quite some time.

And so I'm going to do help promote their work as well, everything that I can to in addition to to my own work and and I've been doing a lot of speaking engagements on this because again you know for the last three years I've been talking about technocracy you would be amazed that even you know people in crypto that are pro-liberty that are pretty you know pretty sophisticated are unaware of this differentiation between technocracy and technology. I think it's critical to figure out how to communicate that. And the articles and the podcasts and speaking engagements alone aren't going to do it. Memes are also very powerful. Short clips on Instagram and TikTok. We just need to figure out

how to get these messages across. And when I do the dedicated podcast on this topic in particular, I'll give specific some asks. I mean, I need some help with all of this. And so I am planning to ramp up significantly and want to work with people and bring people on that want to help. I mean, not necessarily in any kind of a full-time capacity, but there may be different projects that we can collaborate on and certainly open to partnerships. And so to the extent that you're interested in this area or knowledgeable about this area or have any interest, let me know. And again, when I do my dedicated podcast on this, it will become clearer what's going on. But again, why is this important?

The short summary of it is, my view technocracy is the end of free will and when I do finally write the the thing on yarvan and everything else when we go into what I think is really behind the ideology is that it's it is really rooted in um materialism and in a way in in newtonian physics and at the end the view of it is that our free will doesn't matter our consciousness doesn't matter we are essentially just just meat sacks. And so it doesn't we really don't matter. This is how you get to this point where things like the Georgia Guidestones and people saying, well, we only need five hundred million people on the planet. If your ideology is one that's based entirely on

materialism and kind of Newtonian physics and the outcome of that, the logical conclusion of that worldview, would be something like technocracy and I think the overwhelming majority of people if they understood that that's what it was about would strongly object and would strongly object to the idea that their free will should be taken away and so again the hard part about all of this is going to be explaining that it's not anti-technology that it's it's about it is about choice and it's about consent within the realm of technology but to that end Technology can be used to manipulate people. And I don't even know where it fits into these three pillars.

But if you look at things like MK Ultra, you look at mind control, you look at even what's going on with blue light, the ability to use social media and these technologies to manipulate people's dopamine systems and to literally physically, you know, addict people and manipulate them in really interesting ways. that kind of plays into this aspect of free will as well and so some of this is going to be kind of hard to parse out but this is why I'm going to focus some part of time on a dedicated basis to the technocracy take over the next area I call the autonomy reboot um

and the action there is is is that we need to to evolve and I've spoken about this a number of different podcasts I talked about it a lot during the fast but before I do that I'm going to play a clip from bruce lipton I don't know if you're familiar with him he's a somewhat famous biologist who has really talked about um a number of really interesting areas including epigenetics and so let me play this clip because I think it it will set the stage for this entire conversation. Let me see where this clip is. Here we go. Many of them create a state of super learning like you were when you were an infant. Yet there is a better and faster way even.

Their mind has two parts. The subconscious mind is the original brain, and it can process forty million bits of data from the environment every second. The mind is very powerful and very fast, but it's totally habitual. It's not creative. It can only play back what it learns. In evolution, the front part of the brain, the prefrontal cortex gives rise to consciousness. It's a small piece of the brain that is consciousness. Self or consciousness is an add-on option, and most people don't exercise the option.

But note, it can process only about forty bits of data per second. The subconscious mind is one million times more powerful While the subconscious mind is fast, the conscious mind is slow at processing. That's why when you're in an emergency or stress, you operate from this one because it can operate fast and handle lots of data. But the difference between the two is this is habitual. It is the conscious mind that is creative and can generate free will. The conscious mind can control anything in your entire body. They used to say there were

parts of our body that were involuntary control. But now we know that's not true. For example, yogis can regulate their heartbeat, their blood pressure or body temperature with conscious mind. So while the conscious mind can only handle a few things, the subconscious mind can do many, many thousands of tasks at the same time. Now recently neuroscientists are talking about how your unconscious really shapes your life, your decisions. What they say according to cognitive neuroscientists, we are conscious of only about five percent of our cognitive activity. Most people, one percent of their day is in

the conscious mind. So every day, You create only from your creation mind, your conscious mind, only about one percent of what is going on in your life. And therefore, ninety five to ninety nine percent of your life comes from your programming in your subconscious mind. So what this means is maybe you were the child in the store and your parents said you do not deserve. Ninety-five percent of the day you will sabotage your life to make sure you do not deserve. And the reason why is the subconscious job is to create reality out of the program. And so therefore if you have negative programming,

ninety-five percent of the day you will create that negative experience in your life. Now here's the problem. The conscious mind and the subconscious mind work together. So whatever the conscious mind focuses on, it can control. But what it's not focusing on, the subconscious mind controls. so most of our day we are thinking about the future or thinking about the past that's with the conscious mind so if the conscious mind's not paying attention to right now then everything you're doing during the day is being run by the program that you got but the problem is because your mind is not the conscious mind is not paying attention then it does not see the program

being played by the subconscious mind so most of every day you are not playing programs that you personally want you're playing programs that you got from other people but you didn't see those programs so when your life doesn't work You say the universe does not support me and yet the truth was it was your own invisible behavior that sabotage you. So what's important is some people say well maybe I just do some positive thinking. Which mind does the positive thinking conscious or subconscious? The conscious mind which works at five percent a day with a forty bit processor And when you're doing your consciousness,

are you paying attention to what's going on? Who's running the show? The experiential programs from the subconscious mind, and that is ninety-five percent of the day with forty million bit processors. Does positive thinking work? Do the math. And the issue is that it is very difficult to take a small processor and overpower the large processor. And you have to use what is called willpower with the emphasis on power to override. Now here is the second catch or the second problem. The subconscious mind is like a recorder tape player. it records an experience and then when you push the

button it plays the experience back so then we take our conscious mind and we want to talk to the subconscious mind and change the program now think about it this way you have a tape player and I give you a cassette with a program you put the tape in and you push play and the program is going you say I don't like the program Then you go up to the tape player and you say, change the program, change the program. The issue is the tape will not change by doing that. But there are ways to change the program if you know how to push the record button. So I thought that was actually a very interesting way to tee this up because I started to explore Bruce Lipton in, in,

and have explored a whole variety of different areas related to this. And I think that this is critically important. I said this a couple of weeks ago that, you know, one of the things that, you know, I'm not particularly keen on going out and trying to become part of this fifth generation warfare where essentially you just have different people competing to program people that's essentially what it comes down to it comes down to you know I'm trying to counter program and this person's doing this and and and largely that's what most of of media is most of media is top-down driven with an agenda explicitly attempting to influence you,

as Bruce talked about there. If you're not actually conscious of what's going on, then you're not writing the program. Somebody else is writing the program. So to me, it's it's incredibly difficult to make the changes that we need, knowing that what's looming is technocracy, which is essentially a movement that wants to completely centrally program things and further move us away from ourselves and our own consciousness. And this moves in a variety of different ways. It moves first to using wearables, then to injecting technology in us, then moving directly to transhumanism. And I'm not necessarily saying that the application of technology is bad, but what I would say is

that we know very little about ourselves and the power of our own consciousness and our own ability to control our subconscious and on top of that we know very little about consciousness itself so before we go and start externalizing everything and moving more away from free will to me we should probably spend a little bit more time a little more exploration and understanding the nature of consciousness itself and so related to that I mean the first step in all of this is is recognizing that you've been programmed. And so most people are, are not awake in this respect. I mean, I would, I would say either Bruce Lipton or Joe Dispenza, you know,

by the time you're, Thirty five years old, you know, ninety five to ninety nine percent of what you do the next day is the same as what you did the day before. Lipton kind of touched on that idea. It's the programming that's running. You kind of check out. This is why people go through midlife crisis, because at some point you realize, hey, what's going on here? You've kind of become an NPC. I don't necessarily think that there are NPCs out there in the sense that There are people that are just like intentionally there as programmed background filler. I think we have the capacity to become NPCs by giving up our consciousness and by being programmed by outside forces and then never

really becoming aware of that fact. But at any point in time, you can become aware of that fact. the ultimate battleground here and the ultimate way to kind of defeat technocracy and to reclaim free will that's all an inside job that's all a you know no one can do that for you there's no white knight that can fix that and it starts with recognizing programming and so what are the sources of programming I mean there are numerous sources but you know I'll touch on some of the large ones when you have family and you know before you're seven years old you have no conscious filter so anything that comes in when you're young you internalize that so if somebody says you're not worthy or whatever it

happens to be you didn't really have a way to say hey stop that's not true that actually then gets kind of embedded in your subconscious which you then have to become aware of proactively later when you are conscious to be able to recognize that that's something that isn't your identity and that's something that you can Reverse. You're also influenced heavily by school, by media, by technology, by peers, by religion, by culture, by politics. This is only a kind of a partial list. But as you go through this process, once you become aware of the fact that either you're programming yourself or you're being programmed by someone else, then you end up doing a lot of deep research.

introspective work and these are some of the top limiting beliefs that that people tend to internalize through programming that really hold them back so I'm not good enough or I can't succeed or I'm not in control or change is impossible or I don't deserve happiness or I must conform, or the world is dangerous, or I'm alone. And there's a whole long list. Probably about six years or so ago, I actually put together this like, four hundred and thirty five slide presentation and kind of broke down, tried to break down all of this. I've actually been working on this idea for a while, and then I stopped when when I saw the CVDC threat. So the stuff that I'm talking about in this section,

had COVID not happened and had I not become aware of the threat of technocracy, this is probably where I would have been spending a hundred percent of my time. This was where I was spending a hundred percent of my time. And what I've realized as I've been fighting CVDCs and trying to educate people on technocracy, it doesn't matter if people become aware of technocracy, if they're not even aware of the fact that that they've been programmed and have the ability to take control of their own life you know again I don't want to be part of the problem I don't want to be someone who's here providing alternative programming um I want to help people reclaim their own free will which then

they can exercise in whatever way they see fit and I think that's that's a critical thing to do and there are a lot of ways of doing it so one of the pursue this is I studied other reasons I didn't other methodologies of of how others have done this. And it usually breaks down. It usually breaks down in a number of different ways. It either ends up becoming about financial gain. It becomes about power. It becomes about a sex cult. I mean, the thing is, I mean, people have known about this whole idea that you can reprogram your subconscious for a long time. it's very known in occult traditions. I mean, And the problem is that usually when somebody knows this, oftentimes the people that try to

teach this to others have their own agenda and then they end up using it not to teach people to reclaim their free will but to reprogram them for whatever their aims are and so actually I studied this a lot I studied you know whether it's groups like landmark or even osho or you look at um scientology you can look at at nexium I mean you actually if you look at the program materials for nexium NXIVM leaned into and borrowed a lot of this information. A lot of the techniques that they were using were obviously very effective, and he was using them specifically to create his own sex cult and raise a

whole bunch of money. I have no interest in doing anything like that. And so I've kind of held off. And then also I've spent more time fighting the other side. But there are a variety of different methodologies that you can use. You can do meditation. You can do fasting, which I've talked about a lot, which I think is a great way to start. In fact, you can do all of these. Generally, once you start Once you are aware that you're programmed, you actually start testing out and experimenting with a variety of things. I don't even think there is one best approach. And I think the idea that you would even search for one doesn't make a lot of sense. However, it is helpful to teach people

about these different methodologies. And so I'd like to bring some of these people in and maybe interview those and make that part of the content as well. So the sound healing, there's a whole, again, a whole variety of different uh mechanism so for this second pillar for um for this this component of it to help people reclaim their free will you know I'm gonna I'll do some content you know similar you know podcasts I'm not I don't know I'm gonna do a lot of articles or anything like that but really I'm gonna focus on interviewing people and then I want to create a community around this as well so if there are people that are really genuinely interested in this um

when I do my separate episode on this, Again, you can indicate that at that point in time. I think it's important when you do have people that have kind of woken up and are starting to break out of the programming, it's good to be able to build a community around that because you tend to be And I'm sure you all, kind of lonely. if you're listening to this, You experienced this when... have experienced this. If you ever go to hang out with old friends or you go to family gatherings, it's kind of like you're on a different planet to a certain degree. There's almost nothing to talk about. The only thing you can talk about are frivolous things that happened in the past.

maybe recounting old memories, but you really can't have any active conversation the real world today. about what's going on in So creating a community, whatever that means. And then I would say, lastly, developing an open source toolkit for this. I'm stressing the open source because I don't want this to be a pushing a methodology or even pushing an agenda the entire purpose of this is to figure out how to take all this great knowledge that's out there all of these tools and techniques and make it available for people to use uh in in a way that is not not driven by any agenda other than the desire for people to understand that they can reclaim their free will and

to show them how to do that so Again, more on that in a separate episode. And that's a really interesting... There are so many different ways that can branch off. And so it'll be interesting to see even how that evolves. And the last is... the revolution will be tokenized. So again, we're waking people up to the imminent threat of technocracy, which threatens free will itself, providing tools, creating a community to help people at a personal level, because all of this is about controlling your own thoughts, your own emotions, your own actions, and only you can do that. And so to try to create content and tools around that. And then lastly, to build and to build an

alternative to technocracies. One of the big challenges that we face is when they offer something like fifteen minute cities, it looks attractive. And in particular, they've been able to push technocracy largely through emergencies. what the emergency is when And it doesn't even matter you go back and look at it. I've spent a lot of time studying I mean, financial surveillance and where did we get the laws that we have? Why do we have all of the tracking? Why does it take so long to set up a bank account or a crypto account? Why are people being debanked? And you go back to the whole history of all this. It started in nineteen seventy with The Bank Secrecy Act, which was designed to rein

in organized crime at the time, which it failed at, but no one looks back at that. But then when you look at the bulk of the actual financial surveillance happened after that, and it happened with things that were completely unrelated. So then you end up having nine eleven. And so we got a whole bunch of financial surveillance with the Patriot Act. we got some financial surveillance when the two thousand eight financial crisis happened, which that's an odd one. Right. So now we get punished with additional financial surveillance because a bunch of bankers gambled with everybody bunch of leverage and else's money with a whole suffered no consequences. Why is it that we are the

ones that actually feel the pain for that, not the people that actually caused the problem? But again, that's always how it works. The CARES Act introduced a financial reporting and bunch of additional financial surveillance. So again, a pandemic caused by the government And the effect of it is more financial surveillance leading to more censorship and more debanking. So there's never a situation, I have not yet found a single example of where financial privacy has been restored. And I've never seen a situation where an emergency measure that was intended to be temporary was reversed that related to this kind of surveillance. I mean, you can see the absurd theory of it,

theater of it with this thing with the TSA. So people are celebrating. Oh yeah, you don't have to take your shoes off. That's because they've added new surveillance so that you don't need to take the shoes off. The surveillance is still there. It's just now happening behind the scenes. And with the hundred and fifty billion dollar component of this new bill that passed that has ai in surveillance I guarantee you this it will be more it's more intrusive there will be more information collected on you so the fact that you don't have to take your shoes off is in no way a victory at all it's a it's absolutely a pure victory it's actually a loss but I encourage anybody if you anybody out

there that's found I'll keep on digging on ai and everything else but try to try to find an example where this stuff has been reversed and so it hasn't and and so now we have to build alternatives we know that technocracy is coming and the best way to understand what the technocracy looks like is I mean it doesn't have to come from the un it doesn't have to come through the wef but you can look at it as a blueprint and I actually did this for my book so this was in the very in the first edition of the book I actually introduced this concept of Remember the end goal here is a technocracy with one global digital currency. And that digital currency is expressed where the unit of

account is actually energy credits. This is the longstanding vision for technocracy. And then the seventeen sustainable development goals are essentially you can look at those as elements of a social credit system where these are the behaviors that they're trying to manipulate and control. And when you read through all seventeen of these, it's actually horrifying. They want to control and regulate every asset and everything on earth including the land the air and the sea there isn't anything that isn't covered by these seventeen sustainable development goals and the thing is it's global in nature so this isn't one of these things where if your idea is well I'm gonna go hide in the

forest or whatever I'm going to get a log cabin in the woods that's actually incompatible with this system because the whole point of sustainable development and the whole positioning of this is That the only way that you can save the planet is if you actually can control everything with a command and control top down system. So it doesn't it doesn't it's not compatible with other systems. It's kind of a take it or leave it proposition. So they cover everything from no poverty to zero hunger. And again, they sounds great. Right. Who wants poverty? Right. Who wants hunger and starvation? Right. Who's against good health and wellbeing? Of course, these things all sound great,

but here's what it actually looks like. So as I talked about in episode fourteen, episode fifteen, everything is going to be tokenized. So all of these seventeen Sustainable Development Goals will be turned into token systems. So you're going to have UBI for poverty. You will have food ration tokens. You'll have tokens that are tied to your compliance with health care. Regulations. You will have learning credits. You have water usage tokens, energy quota tokens, residency tokens, carbon penalty tokens. all of these tokens are going to And again, be based fundamentally on energy credits. But they are building a world based on tokenization. So I've argued with some people.

Some people say, well, people don't know what tokenization is. I don't care if people don't know what tokenization is. Tokenization is absolutely one hundred percent inevitable. So we now have to get in the game and actually start educating people on what it is. And more importantly, on building the privacy, self-custody alternatives to this, because this is exactly what it looks like. I've outlined in some of my Brownstone articles. I mean, it starts out with CBDCs or stable coins. but then it moves to now your stocks are tokenized, your bonds are tokenized. And again, I see people cheering this on. BlackRock is excited about tokenization. Oh yeah, Well, tokenization, that's crypto.

That means they like crypto and that means that my crypto is gonna go up. And it's just, do you think BlackRock is interested in you having self-custody security tokens? Why would BlackRock want you to be able to own your own shares? They're in the business. of making money, investing other people's money and voting other people's shares. So do you think maybe when they're talking about their enthusiasm towards tokenization, it's because they know that the tokenization protocols and the type of technology that's gonna be used still allows them to be in there as a centralized third party? I mean, the answer is yes. You can actually trace it. You can actually see what they're working on.

You can see the systems that are being built and how they're tied into CBDCs and the Bank of International Settlements and everything else. And so I'm not theorizing that they might have these bad intentions. They've been building this stuff. So while crypto has been working on, meme coins and Hawk Tua and all you know, this other bullshit and people getting excited about Trump coins, they're literally... working on tokenized carbon credit systems. They're working on tokenization systems for land and none of it benefits you and none of it benefits your cryptocurrency. And if it did benefit your cryptocurrency, then you're probably on the wrong side of freedom. You know, and I do

I urge people to question, do you want to back something? You might be able to make fiat money backing something that implements digital tyranny, but is that really where you want to be? Is that where you want your kids and grandkids to end up? Do you think you're going to end up in a good place just because for some short period of time you captured some fiat gains while implementing this beast system? In my book and in my conversations, I'm going to go in detail on this, explaining what all this tokenization means from the perspective of FIRST, what it means when it's implemented centrally and how that relates to this digital surveillance system. But then more importantly,

I'm going to spend more time talking about why privacy coins and privacy tokens are important. Patrick Byrne is where I really got enthusiastic between Patrick Byrne and Bruce Fenton, really. Bruce talking about security tokens, but then Patrick Byrne talking about building a blockchain tech stack for human civilization, where you could basically tokenize all of the functions. And at one point in time, because he was going to turn overstock into a blockchain business, which I think this is probably one of the biggest hijackings. It's right next to Bitcoin in terms of how profoundly hijacked overstock was in his entire situation and what the ramifications of that are actually for freedom.

and liberty but his whole idea is well I mean if you use blockchain technology you could get rid of government corruption and you could have a hot swappable system so that when government fails you can move over to this other system and so he was investing in a whole bunch of different companies to work on different aspects of this everything from land registry and titling to voting and governance to supply chain I remember I bought a bottle of wine from a a company that had tokenized wine using raven coins so he had a whole a whole different thing built and anyway it was torn apart um the raven coin still exists but one of the things that I learned from it from that

exercise is and that he learned from it is the biggest area that they saw for potential to get rid of corruption is in the stock market and actually when you look at assets money represents five percent of global assets but but beyond that financial assets stocks bonds and derivatives are the largest portion of global assets I mean, I think derivatives themselves are something like one point two quadrillion dollars. And so this is a massive amount of money and there's a huge amount of fraud because they're all of these third parties involved. And there's one company called Seed&Co that actually manages all of the stock certificates and the CEO of that company. X CIA.

And then when you drill into this, you'd be blown away by how not efficient it is, but also how centralized it is by people that have bad intent. Most people think, oh, the stock market is really high, high tech because you think about these people that are doing high frequency trading and everything else and what you find out. behind the scenes is you have Goldman Sachs and investment banks ripping people off, ripping off pension funds by allowing their shares to be used for short selling where they're collecting fees from other people and not telling anybody about it. The whole system is absolutely rigged. So Patrick thought, well, Blockchain is a way to address that because now

all the transactions are going to be on an immutable ledger. So he invests massive amounts of money in this company called T-Zero, invested in a Canadian options exchange called Box. And the idea was you were going to be able to start to trade these options and trade these derivatives on the blockchain. And he got pushed out of his company and was never able to get regulatory approval. it wasn't until under Biden that In fact, some company that nobody had ever heard of actually finally got approval to do something like this. The moral of the story is incumbent players, and this is a lesson that a lot of people don't understand. There's this belief that the best technology always wins

and that people will always pick the fastest, cheapest, best technology. And that's not true. Incumbent players, particularly since we don't really have free markets in the US, which I learned, you know, thirty years ago, I learned that during my first startup when I spent I think I must have met with one hundred and fifty VCs and a whole bunch of people on Wall Street. We had a a crony system where incumbent players exert government bribes and so forth with the government. And this is how the system works. It's not it's not a free market at all. And so these people will protect their turf. You can look at Martin Armstrong and his case is another one. He spent seven years in jail

for contempt because he had an economic model that that could predict market patterns. And one of the judges allegedly was there's a documentary about this was It's called the Forecaster, I believe, was bought off by Goldman Sachs and so refused to let him out. He was in prison for contempt for seven years because he wouldn't give up his model. So in any event, we need alternatives to this. And so if you're sitting there thinking, oh, yeah, my blockchain is the fastest, BlackRock is going to use it. That's not that's not going to happen. So the book that I'm writing, I've actually got, I don't know, probably a third of it done. It's called The Revolution Will Be Tokenized.

And the whole purpose of it is to talk about why tokenization is important compared to centralized databases and the problem with centralized databases and why we are at this freedom versus tyranny battle, technocracy versus freedom battle. or excuse me, with respect to tokenization. But I will say people don't understand tokenization. And so a big part of what I'm going to do is I'm going to give actual examples of how the technocrats are going to use tokenization. And then I've just said that I'm going to lay out a bunch of different use cases for privacy tokens and explain how you can use them and in fact maybe for the top five or ten different use cases I may even put together a

prototype a website put together a you know what the business model is the business case and share it share it with people not I just want to see this stuff built I mean I may participate in some of it but the more important thing is that it's built so you know i I've battled with this because there's part of me that has been a serial entrepreneur and is like, well, I should just build something. On the other hand, I also realize if people aren't broadly, don't wake up to the threat of technocracy, it doesn't matter. This is one of the problems that crypto has is that you are built and they're built have these products that for an audience of no one or an audience of like five hundred people.

And it's the same people like in the privacy space. The people that are in privacy coins have been in privacy coins for a long time. And a lot of it is this Guy Fawkes masks and everything else. And look, I love all of it. I agree with that. But we need privacy money and privacy tokens for everyone. It's not a niche. This is a tool that is necessary to fight for free will. And in the absence of it, everyone's in trouble you're not going to be able to hide out you know because you and five hundred of your buddies are using xeno and monero that's not a a viable option so so the first half of the book is going to lay out why tokenization is is an important technology it's

going to lay out how the technocrats are going to use it it's more of the kind of like my first book the first part is the theory and the history And the back half is going to be these practical examples. Here's something that you could build on Zeno. You could build a health care marketplace on Zeno. You could build a health care marketplace where people could do medical tourism, where you could price medical services throughout the world. I think I had a slide on this. If not, it was a meme I put together somewhere. You can save ninety to ninety five percent if you shop medical services outside of the United States. And I use the example of the person in California that

actually went to Thailand for a week to get a root canal because it was cheaper than her copay through her dental insurance. This is there are many such cases. This is mostly the scenario at this point in time. And people, again, aren't aware. They aren't aware. They've never thought or even considered medical tourism. They bought into some idea that the US has the best health care in the world. And then they bought into the fact that many people have jobs that they don't could have health insurance. want just so that they And so then because they have now we're into sunk cost fallacy territory where, well, now because I have this job and because I have this insurance, it must be good.

And then they don't even think to look outside of that system. But you could create an international marketplace of health care. services where people were paying for it not using insurance with nine layers of intermediaries and people fraudulently getting involved and you know collecting premiums and not paying out claims and then the government gets involved and all this other stuff I know quite a bit about insurance but a lot of time in that area but it's it's it's idiotic and it's also not a marketplace in its own right I'm not going to rant about that here I'll rant about it later but it's uh needless to say you could build a complete global healthcare marketplace where the

transactions were private. reputation management You could still have a system and people anywhere in the world could find access to healthcare services. And it would in fact even be cheaper than insurance. And then equally you could create all kinds of other models because then somebody says well what about helping poor people and everything else which by the way one of the things that medicaid does is it gets people addicted to prescription opioids if you look at what medicaid actually provides people they probably a lot of people would be better off without it because it's just creating a sense of addiction and dependency on things that that enslave people to big pharma

it's not a life-saving situation it's an enslaving through taxpayer-funded big pharma so but you could create pools of money, you could crowdsource catastrophic coverage to help people. There are all kinds of voluntary systems. So not only could you reduce the cost and increase the choice and the quality and have a reputation management system. And by the way, when I say reputation management system, so my second company was in healthcare, my dad actually had an insurance company. So I have I learned from him how how kind of the inside of it works. And it is Well, I don't know. I don't know if I'm going to go through this whole thing at this point,

but there are ways of setting up risk pools and ways of providing. Oh, I was going to say one other aspect of Sorry, this. the train of thought I lost was related to this idea of reputation management systems. I remember being at a health care conference. World Health Care Congress or something. I think it was called the It was in Washington, D.C. It was probably two thousand five, two thousand six. And I remember some doctor getting up there giving a talk. And the whole point of the talk was basically why patients are too stupid. to rate doctors. And so if you've noticed, there really aren't great systems for providing ratings on doctors. Yes, you will find a few things here and there.

But largely speaking, there are very few transactions. A lot of the stuff is, you'd think that given the volume, frankly, that doctors have and everything else and the emotional experience people have with healthcare system, that you'd have this wealth of data and you'd have a very robust system. And the reality is doctors have fought tooth and nail as of health care insurance health insurance providers and one of the arguments they use is well this patient's too stupid to understand if they got the right care or one of the other things they'll say as well yeah but if I'm a doctor and I'm treating really complex cases and another doctor is treating really easy cases then I'm going to show up

as being you know a worse doctor you know it's kind of like When you're in the Olympics and you have gymnasts and they have different scales based on difficulties, like, well, the patient's too stupid to be able to categorize the difficulty of the procedure and weight that. I was floored by this. And so we really don't have a reputation management system. We have a system where other people pay for other people's health care. There's no accountability. so this is one example and I'm actually passionate if I will come up with the business model for this and prototype for it and you I'll even come up with a know if somebody wants to build it I'll help them or if somebody wants to just

build it on their own they can build it it needs to be built this is one that I might actually actively get involved in the other just as a you know brief ideas I've mentioned several times but I'm also passionate about this You can buy and trade meme coins right now, but good luck if you have a small business and you want to raise money. You have to spend fifty thousand dollars on a securities lawyer. You have to spend months of time preparing documents. And these documents that you put together have pages and pages that are in all caps that nobody reads. I've talked a lot about click wrap agreements, but also the fact that people have become numb to reading these agreements.

And these agreements have become unnecessarily complex and in bullshit lawyer language to preserve the livelihood of the lawyers. It's I mean, you think about it now with AI, it's OK, you know, You should be able to say, all right, this is what I want to do, put it in plain English, and then it puts it into a binding agreement that's also in plain English. But instead, we have a system that has been built up with a combination of the legal lobby and everything else and the securities industry where it's now... almost unaccessible to raise small amounts of money and if you're a small investor it's almost impossible to invest in early stage companies sure you can buy a lottery ticket you can

buy the trump meme coin but you can't invest in the next amazon you can't invest in the next tesla we're going to put in requirements that say you have to be a millionaire in order to do this and if you're some young guy that's got a brilliant idea unless you're well connected have a lot of money to pay these legal fees that's going to be one of the most significant barriers to you being successful in the united states of america so when I talk about these ideas from xeno I'm not talking about oh hey we're going to create this and then blackrock is going to use it we're beyond that point this is about building parallel systems now by the way anybody can use this technology for

whatever purpose they want what I'm telling you is that The applications that I'm building are for parallel systems. I'm not interested in working within the existing system because it is a binary decision. You don't kind of cooperate with a technocratic system. So we need to build ways for small businesses to be able to raise money from small investors and literally create our own system outside of the SEC, outside of how everything works. So that's another example of tokenization. And again, I could go through point by point with what they're building and all of the tokenization from UN, and then I could come up with a, all right, here's a way of doing it.

And of course, you know, it's a way, whatever I come up with is not probably going to be ideal. I mean, it might be pretty good in the areas where I have a lot of knowledge, but in the areas where I don't have a lot of knowledge and I'm just kind because I'm doing a little of putting it together bit of research on it, it may be something that stimulates people that know more about these industries and more about these problems to say, oh, well, here's a better way of doing it. And that's great. And so I'm happy to put together a library of of these business models and things that can be built on Xeno. And I think this is an important next step on this because it's, yes,

now you understand technocracy is a problem. Now you realize you're empowered to take control of it yourself. And by the way, here's some tools and here's some business ideas. Because people get stuck. A lot of the fear and fear is what drives how they implement more surveillance and implement technocracy. But a lot of the fear is around, well, how am I gonna feed myself? How am I going to be able to earn a living? And the truth is there's an infinite amount of possibility in building these parallel systems. Everything that you see in the world today that in fact, everything that you interact with, everything that you buy and sell that you see that's corrupt and inefficient,

replicated and built in a all of that can be way that's privacy based using tokenization, like all of it. So again, This is a situation where we're going to be picking an operating system or multiple operating systems. I like Zeno. I think Zeno is the best thing out there, mainly the only thing out there for privacy tokens, but I'm not a maximalist. There will be multiple technologies, there should be multiple technologies. There aren't going to be multiple technologies from the technocratic perspective. It morphs towards a singular top down version of everything. So so I really want to in this book and in this pillar of things that I'm working on, empower people with with ideas and I may get

directly involved and so when I do the podcast specifically going into this area as well I'm going to flesh that out but the book I think has to be written even though I know a lot of people it's I don't expect the revolution will be tokenized to be a you know a number one bestseller I think it'll be important though for people that want to build, that want to exit and build. So that's the primary audience. I mean, I'm obviously, I've talked about this repeatedly, which is that, you know, ideas and companies, they, they don't start mainstream. They always first start with innovators and early adopters before they become mainstream. So everything that I'm talking about here,

and if you're listening to this, this is a, this is for early adopters and that's, that's the intention. So I'm not even gearing this for, you know, people like, Oh, aren't you mad? You're not on, you know, NBC or whatever. I actually have rejected and turned down press opportunities with mainstream media because it's, that's not going to help if somebody's not even aware that they're being programmed and they hear what I have to say they're going to be pissed off about it or they're going to laugh it off or whatever it's not it's not going to sink we've got to go to where people are eager for for change and those are the people that are going to create the change so in

addition to the book and other content that I'm gonna continue to do, try to educate people on tokenization. I'm gonna do the workshops again, but these are gonna be completely different than the workshops before, because it's not only gonna be introducing people to crypto, as consumers with wallets, but also signing up merchants so that they can receive crypto. And then the other component to it is also presenting people with business ideas so that they can learn about how they can actually make money in this alternative economy. I think those three things combined are going to be critical to actually getting meaningful adoption uh as opposed to you know again the workshops I'm glad I've

done all the workshops that I've done and I've learned quite a bit from it and the main thing that I've learned about it is there's such a big disconnect from people that are in crypto versus what the general public and this is the people that are at my workshops are not the general public these are people that are actually way ahead of the curve but they're not people that were early into crypto and there's there's a huge disconnect between where we want to be and what we're talking about here in terms of building an alternative to technocracy and where where the market is at and then lastly I touched on briefly I might create an incubator around this where maybe I create

the prototypes um and you know I mean I am a serial entrepreneur I can run companies and start companies again I'm trying to weight right now the importance of these three areas so You know, when you do a startup, I mean, I guess Elon Musk has shown you can do multiple startups at the same time. But, you know, an incubator where maybe I kick some of the ideas off or, you know, maybe I'll do the health care marketplace if no one else does it. I mean, there may be some that I am really passionate about. If no one else does it and it needs to get done, I'll do it. But I might also just advise or, you know, invest in other people that want to take the reins on some of these ideas that I

put forward for tokenization. So again, I'm looking forward to doing the podcast on that. And so that's essentially it. We have kind of a small audience tonight. None of the people that I reached out to that normally show up for the Q&A are available tonight. But I would say the general overview here is a lot more content going to be heavily investing in this podcast and adding content in these three areas, bringing on a lot of important guests that have knowledge in the areas of technology and personal transformation and tokenization. And so really we'll be ramping that up and we'll be also ramping up

on the hands-on practical applications of privacy tokenization as the antidote to technocracy. So those are the really big takeaways from this. I'm gonna put the link up here if anybody wants to join. I think it's probably, I don't know if that's gonna happen or not. I do like that format. I think maybe I just need to be more consistent with actually doing the show every week because I know it's rare that I do it two weeks in a row just because of the travel schedule. But I think I'm going to be more consistent with that. I do think having the panel is helpful and I may expand out and get kind of a permanent set of people on the panel.

Because usually really good conversation comes out. I like the model of what was done with Free to Choose. This idea of presenting a concept and then getting people to react to and debate the topic. Because I think the debate usually brings up a lot of really good points and interesting points. The problem with this media is we don't have a lot of interactivity in general. And this relates to this autonomy reboot and to what Bruce Lipton was saying, is people are not present. I don't know how many people are I mean, listening to this right now, which is fine. I mean, you may be working out. You may be... in bed you may be driving in

a car who knows who knows where you are but but you know I and I know this is the same with me if I'm listening to a podcast how often do I engage in the chat or how often do I or do I follow up I mean you may oh this is a great idea you know I want to follow up on that but you're in the middle doing five other things and then by the time you know you get to a place to write it down or to follow up it's already gone and so And I'm open to suggestions on this. I want to figure out a way to make this more interactive. I want people to engage in this and to be present with this material because we have an attention economy. And this is one of the way the technocrats win is by

manipulating our attention because they know how it works. They know how these platforms work. They know how these systems work. They're masters at it. Just in a brief way, I think you know, ten years ago before I took my five and a half year break to get involved with these lawsuits and everything related to my past political activism. You could email people. I had multiple ways of being able to actually reach out to my own contacts. And now I actually can't reach out to my own contacts. I can't even download. I used to have all the email addresses for my LinkedIn contacts, which, of course, LinkedIn is almost completely useless at this point. I can't even download my own contacts.

You can only reach maximum of two percent of your audience on Facebook. I don't even know how to reach the people that that I know. And now it's the point where people don't even use the phone. But one thing I noticed in just looking at trends is that the open rate for emails has dropped off. So in the last ten years, and I think COVID had a lot to do with this as well, people are paying even less attention. People are more tuned out. They're less conscious. They're more engaged in multitasking. So I don't know how to make this podcast yet more interactive I mean obviously this has been me doing a monologue for this one and I will do a couple of monologues just to frame what I'm doing moving

forward but the ultimate goal is for for it to not be just me talking the whole time it's going to be for me to be bringing in other guests and then also to try to make this more interactive with uh with the audience I'm gonna see if um If Dan O'Neill wants to join, anybody who wants to join, I put a link in there. If not, that's fine. I should probably figure out a way to get people some not only advanced knowledge of the thing, but also what the topics are and then allow people to put up topics related to this. I don't necessarily want to make this about current events. I've actually been asked to do... some other shows to kind of

not co-host some podcasts but to to have some shows on uh some other networks which I might do but I you know but what I said is I'm not gonna do I'm not gonna do anything daily because it takes a lot of work to do that kind of content and my content is it's specifically focused on addressing what I think is the biggest threat that we face, which is technocracy. I could come on here and I could bullshit about the news every day, and a lot of that riles people up. In fact, again, this is part of what Musk understands about the ability of social media to manipulate people's limbic systems. You don't think he knows how to adjust the model. You don't think that what

happened with Grok three yesterday, all of a sudden coming out with the thing, he knew that would generate a rage response. Right. I mean, I'm sure that absolutely drove traffic through the roof. And so, yes. And now you have a whole bunch of people out there that they're angry. Right. They're they're engaged, but they're engaged in an angry rhetoric. I mean, are we getting a lot of meaningful discussion and debate out of out of this or is he just generating more clicks and more and more revenue? In any event, I do want to figure out how to get more engagement and more interaction.

And at some point, particularly I think the most difficult area of this is the autonomy reboot. It's going to be how to frame that information and then make it make it actionable I mean when I did the fast which I'll do more fasts you know I think I'm going to do a three-day quarterly fast at the minimum I will not be doing another forty day fast ever or recommending that but um I but I will do longer you know duration fast and it would be good to get people to engage in that together I again I think fasting is one of many powerful tools to um to get people engaged. So I'm going to give Dan a few minutes here, and I'll give him five minutes.

And if he doesn't pop in, anybody else wants to pop in, you're welcome to do so. I'm going to give it about five minutes, and then if no one pops in, we'll call it a day. Let's see. Send this out to train live. No comments today either. I don't know what's going on. We actually have a decent audience. I mean, it's, you know, twelve hundred people. it was like ten thousand last week. I mean, But nevertheless, usually we have a little bit more interactivity.

But. I'd be curious to see how many, I don't know, I wish this thing could do polls, what people think about Musk. One thing I do want to say relates to Roger's case. I think I've been pushing on X to get the America Party to rally behind releasing these political prisoners of war. I think this is an interesting strategy, not that I am voting or not supporting the America's party, but I actually think it's

one way that he can get some leverage with Trump. To me, Trump is not complicated. Trump operates on the basis of his own personal self-interest or what it's going to do to pump his media, stroke his ego in the public. you know he obviously likes using strength as a mechanism you know this whole piece through strength and everything in all of these negotiations even with the the bill and then everything that's going on with Iran but and it's hard to you know to have he has a lot of leverage based on what his position is but I think Musk actually has more leverage right now Musk does have the ability

Musk can definitively change the outcome of the midterm elections. I know this because in twenty sixteen I did a very small version of this where I ran a slate of candidates, independent candidates specifically targeting Republicans in New Hampshire. And we made the difference. We were the margin of error for all three New Hampshire congressional races. And that was with essentially no money. But because people were pissed off about about what was going on within the state, with politicians doing things to further their own D.C. careers at the expense of things at the state level. So, you know, if I could do this on a small scale with the three

congressional seats in New Hampshire, obviously Elon has the capacity between the fact that all of the all of the races are up every two years and then you have however many of the Senate races are up, roughly a third, he certainly can flip the outcome given how divided it is. And so that's a big piece of leverage. So if the America party gets behind these political prisoners of war then then maybe that will push trump to act and then if trump doesn't act then you know maybe america's party people will you know will take action but I I think we need to do everything that we can to get these prisoners out now I mean they should be released already I mean trump said the war on crypto is over

Biden's war on crypto is over, and that may be true in some respects. It's not true with respect to the stablecoin legislation. It's not true in a number of other areas, but it is true with respect to the SEC crackdown and meme coins and some other areas. but all of the real heroes of crypto, all of the people that are really responsible for the good elements of crypto and making it what it is today, none of those cases have been dropped. And I mean, I'm not even seeing that there's any movement. I mean, I think that Tornado Cash just won, they're not going to appeal, the federal government's not going to appeal the Tornado Cash case, but yet the devs individually are still facing,

their trials and so, you know, I don't know if giving them the benefit of the doubt is the right thing, but whatever we need to do, I will tell you, I thought to a certain degree that maybe the DOJ would take action on these cases, you know, and that's how stupid this was. I remember thinking that I heard Pam Bondi say that she was, that it was gonna take time to review all of this evidence. I don't know if you guys remember, it was something like, ten thousand hours of videotape and everybody was talking about how much evidence this was and then people were saying, well, you know, we have to follow the rule of law, so we're gonna prosecute this and we're gonna, you know,

we're gonna get every single one of the people on the client list. And so that's a big undertaking for the DOJ. now that it turns out they just closed the case on it I I actually can't tell you what I don't know what the doj does I mean in fact it seems like the only thing the doj does is you know continue to prosecute people under biden era crypto lawfare but they don't seem to be particularly active in any other area and so um so maybe you know maybe the america party and and trying to elevate this so if you think about it if you see Elon tweet or America Party tweet, maybe if you make a reference in your own words to the importance of letting these political prisoners go, it might help.

I mean, I've tried, but given that I spend most of my time bashing Musk and bashing technocracy, I may not be the most likely person to get through. Although I did get a positive response back. The America Party, the commentary site, account that has like three hundred thirty five thousand followers liked my comment about you know asking if the america party will will address this issue so um but that's just something else to consider well it looks like no one's gonna gonna jump on now so I guess I'm gonna break this one a little early but uh thank you for listening this was just as I said an introduction to the three big areas I'll I'll do separate podcasts on each of these I'm not

necessarily going to do them in a row. Oh, here we go. Ed McClain, Pam Bondi's desk just cleared up. Yeah, there we go. Yeah, I mean, again, what you know, Well, look, I mean, I could paint the alternative picture. Maybe you don't want these people to be free if they know what they're doing, right? I mean, they're pushing surveillance stable coins. They're pushing backdoor CBDCs. And maybe you don't want the people that are the most effective at promoting peer-to-peer digital cash out there. I don't know. I don't know if they're... I think there's a disconnect. My personal view is that in Trump's first term, people complained that he

had a bunch of swamp creatures and people that were overly familiar with D.C. on his side, and they kind of pushed him into making some bad decisions because he really didn't know all that much about politics. So this was the excuse that people were making. I think this time what he decided to do was surround himself with what he sees are and they are clearly successful business people, billionaires, and he's taking their advice. And I think their advice might actually be worse, particularly with respect to pushing technocracy. And so I'm going to go into not only detail on Yuval Harari and Curtis Yarbon, but

you really need to do a deep dive into what these people believe, Thiel and Musk in particular. There's some interesting things about Thiel that a lot of people aren't aware of. There is a documentary on Netflix about this, but if you look at Thiel's writings and his, he has a real doom and gloom kind of outlook from a philosophical perspective, like end times kind of thing. But then you couple that with know his personal situation which was you know he was outed as as being gay by gawker and his response to that was to behind the scenes fund a lawsuit fund hulk hogan's lawsuit there

was a sex tape released um with with hulk hogan and so teal funded that lawsuit intentionally to bankrupt gawker so I mean this is a guy that you know he's got a lot of issues he's got you know and we we see what his personality is like with that that's kind of a that should be a little um that should be concerning as musk always likes to say and I think even with musk I mean musk seems to be certainly willing and able to operate out of a sense of revenge and that this could even be with people with whom he's fathered children, Well, I'm going to de-boost this person. right? I'm not going to talk to this person. you don't agree with me on immigration. Oh,

Well, you know, you're gone. You, you're, you have groper, groper accounts. We're going to ban that. Um, the problem with this is I mean I could make the argument of it's his platform he can do whatever he wants although he ran on this free speech thing but when you understand that what he's trying to it's in the america's party platform using the ai for military and using ai to make government more efficient so he's going to be centrally putting in these kinds of technologies and so if do you want a politician to be able to weaponize ai-based government in the same way that Elon can weaponize X or anybody can weaponize. I mean, it's not just Elon. Certainly others have

Zuckerberg and others have manipulated their platforms far worse than than Elon has so far. But again, I think that we're seeing a lot of worrying things in terms of his ability to change algorithms and manipulate people and create a lot of rage, which I think is being done intentionally. Think about it from the standpoint of, OK, so what is he saying? His pitch for this America's Party is he's going after the eighty percent. and and so then if he changes the algorithm and all of a sudden he wants to to take advantage of the fact that there are a lot of people pissed off at it israel he can he can tweak the algorithm this way and now all of a sudden oh it's a mistake you know it's

based grok but then he can say well that was just a mistake and then he can switch it another way and actually curry favor with a different group uh that's pretty powerful in terms of what he has the ability to do from the manipulation standpoint that's that's bigger I would argue than what any mainstream media could do at this point, because certainly he has more eyeballs and the ability to manipulate the algorithm at a granular level and the knowledge to be able to do it is he has it. He has the knowledge to be able to do it. And I think he has the temperament to do it. And so that's that's that should be anybody's concern. And so, again, I'm not even saying This is another thing going

to this autonomy reboot aspect of this. This is just my personal view, which I may be wrong on this, but I'm not in this camp of there are these really evil people out there that are just fundamentally, they're demons and this is their fundamental nature. I actually take the view that everybody's programmed. by the same set of external factors that I started to outline in the section on the autonomy reboot including musk and everyone has the capability to recognize their programming and to deal with their internal issues and and to address those things so I don't even view I'm against technocracy and even though

musk is the main guy pushing technocracy, I'm not like this guy is inherently the antichrist or something like that. I actually think that if he thought about it, I think if he just tweaked a few, I think he thinks from first principles, but his first principles are based on materialism and Newtonian physics. I think if you were actually switching it over, it just from a scientific even if you were looking at perspective and not spiritual, and you started looking at quantum physics, you'd have a different set of conclusions that he has. I view all of this. When I look at this autonomy reboot thing, I try to view everybody this way.

I don't really hate anyone. I hate the idea of a movement of people that is trying to take away people's free will, But the goal in any of this isn't to destroy somebody. I think a lot of it is to try to shed light on these issues while helping other people build a life raft for other people. So it's a weird one. But maybe I'm wrong. Maybe there are devils. Who knows? Maybe David Icke's wrong. Maybe these are shape-shifting reptilians and whatever. Maybe this is a different game or whatever going on. But I tend to think that... that's not the case but the stakes are high because once we are giving up our

free will and we're seeing it you see it with you know young kids are completely disconnected people are disconnected from their body they're disconnected from their consciousness they're disconnected from nature and all we're doing is adding more to that every day with more wearables more manipulation. I'll probably do a talk at some point. I'd like to actually have Dr. Jack Cruz on here at some point. He's a Bitcoin maxi, so I don't know how that's going to go. He's retweeted me a couple of times, but he focuses on decentralized medicine. if you see these weird glasses Actually, that I'm wearing right now, these are blue blocker glasses. He's done a lot of research on this idea of the

negative effects of blue light. And it's really interesting to see the history of it because I've studied a lot of the MK Ultra stuff and a lot of what's going on with mind control. And there was a Dr. Delgado who did these experiments where he would put an implant in a bowl and then control with remote control was able to stop the movement of the bowl. And then they subsequently learned they don't even need the implant. You can just use different frequencies. And then when you study the history of blue light, There are a lot of negative health consequences of blue light and a lot of patents that some of the big tech companies have on blue light itself. And so, I mean,

blue light disrupts your circadian rhythms. It actually can spike your insulin levels. There are all kinds of other things. It also messes with your dopamine. So we are completely out of touch. And so the idea behind wearing these glasses is now that it's late at night, I'm trying to not have my body go into this mode where with all these blue lights surrounding me, my body thinks it's daylight, which screws up a whole variety of my biological systems and then screws up my insulin levels, cortisol levels and everything else. And so this is one aspect of it, but it's an interesting rabbit hole to go down. Everything that he's been pursuing with the whole field of decentralized medicine,

but it does relate to not only blue light, but EMF. I mean, there is something to be said. We don't know what the impact is of a five G or any of these other things, but we do know that there are effects. I mean, you wouldn't want to be next to high energy power lines and we know the effects that there are you know cancer clusters and things that happen from that and what you'll find is that nobody wants to run the test there's no financial incentive for anybody to do long-term tests on this I know in the town that I used to live in New Hampshire, a woman was fighting a five G tower coming up. And, you know, just in this small town of like twenty thousand people,

all of a sudden you had Verizon, you had all these lawyers coming in from all over the United States to try to fight this case because they lose. lose one case then they're going to lose they're going to lose it all and then ultimately this is how you learn about local politics and you know it's easy to buy people off and usually they win these cases so they and then they end up having a system of propaganda in for denouncing and calling anybody a conspiracy theorist that dares to question the idea that EMF might actually have negative effect on human biology when it's obvious and it's known in other realms. So anyway, I'll stop ranting on that at this point. And if no one's gonna hop on,

I guess we'll call it a night, but expect some more on decentralized medicine. I think next week, unless I have a guest, I actually have a long list of guests. If you want to shoot me some ideas for guests as well, but I think I have probably a queue of like ten different people that want to come on. I do want to keep the guests confined to these areas. So I do want this podcast to remain about technocracy, you know, whatever, personal transformation and tokenization. I don't want to get, you know, too far afield of that. But if you have any good ideas, let me know. And with that, we'll leave it till next time. I will play this new song, this new AI song that I

created about technocracy on the way out. Have a good evening. In a quiet world, technocracies rise Shadows hide the truth from our eyes Digital chains, freedoms confined Silent

whispers fill our minds Wake up from this technocratic dream. Freedom calls, be on screen. Rise above control, reclaim our lives. Awaken now, open your eyes.

Okay.

Together we can win this fight Break the chains, reclaim your dreams Awaken from technocracy schemes

Open your eyes. Technocracy fades. Freedom will rise.